environments

Article
Pervious Concrete as an Environmental Solution for
Pavements: Focus on Key Properties
Marek Kováč * and Alena Sičáková ID

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]

Received: 29 November 2017; Accepted: 8 January 2018; Published: 9 January 2018

Abstract: Pervious concrete is considered to be an advanced pavement material in terms of the

environmental benefits arising from its basic feature—high water-permeability. This paper presents
the results of experimental work that is aimed at testing technically important properties of pervious
concrete prepared with three different water-to-cement ratios. The following properties of pervious
concrete were tested—compressive and splitting tensile strength, unit weight at dry conditions, void
content, and permeability. The mix proportions were expected to have the same volume of cement
paste, and, to obtain the same 20% void content for all of the samples. The results show that changes
of water-to-cement ratio from 0.35 to 0.25 caused only slight differences in strength characteristics.
Arising tendency was found in the case of compressive strength and a decreasing tendency in the
case of splitting tensile strength. The hydraulic conductivity ranged from 10.2 mm/s to 7.5 mm/s.
The values of both the unit weight and void content were also analysed to compare the theoretical
(calculated) values and real experiment results. A fairly good agreement was reached in the case of
mixtures with 0.35 and 0.30 water-to-cement ratios, while minor differences were found in the case of
0.25 ratio. Finally, a very tight correlation was found between void content, hydraulic conductivity,
and compressive strength.

Keywords: pervious concrete; water to cement ratio; strength; hydraulic conductivity; void content

1. Introduction
People change the natural environment when they build buildings and roads. One of the most
notable changes is connected with the construction of impervious areas in places that were originally
permeable. Impervious areas prevent water from infiltrating the soil underneath. Examples of
impervious areas include rooftops, parking lots, and roadways.
The environment is adversely affected by the integration of impermeable areas into the
surface—this fact causes disruption of the natural water cycle. It consequently causes the blocking
of the natural process of water infiltration through the soil—thus, in the case of storm events and
snowmelts, the water runoff from the impervious surfaces are very fast. There are three main aspects
of this runoff, as given in [1]: “(1) a decrease in groundwater recharge due to lack of infiltration,
(2) alteration in the natural flow patterns of a drainage basin, and (3) transportation of contaminants,
deposited on impervious surfaces, to receiving water bodies”. This is the way how the interruption of
both surface and subsurface water quantity and quality is affected [1].
With development of new urban areas, there is a great challenge in finding new ways to manage
storm-water runoff. Among others, porous pavements are presented as an alternative method for
storm-water control. Types of porous pavements include porous asphalt, pervious cement concrete,
concrete paving-blocks, gravel paving systems, and grass paving systems, among others. According
to [2], the way how the pervious pavements work lies in reduction of runoff volume by allowing for
water to pass through them, be stored, and subsequently be released into the ground.

Environments 2018, 5, 11; doi:10.3390/environments5010011 www.mdpi.com/journal/environments

Environments 2018, 5, 11 2 of 9

Focusing on the pervious concrete, it can be described as a material consisting of open-graded

coarse aggregate, Portland cement, water, and admixtures. The basic arrangement of composition
contains mainly characterization of the aggregate: size of approximately 8 mm; sand is neglected to
leave the space between grains empty. A representative pervious concrete has 15% to 25% of void
space [2,3].
The consistency of pervious concrete mixtures is characterized by little to no slump [4]. This
inherent property is due to the low cement-paste content, allowing the creation of only a thin film
coating the aggregate [5]. High-viscosity paste is needed to coat the aggregates, while resisting the
drain-down of the paste. The mitigation of drain-down is pertinent for the matrix porosity to be
maintained across the width of the concrete section. The structure relies on the stone-to-stone contact
achieved through compaction, which allows for the cement-paste-coated aggregates to bond with
one another. To achieve the proper void structure, it is recommended to use the appropriate cement
paste, which should possess a low water-to-cement (w/c) ratio of about 0.20 to 0.25, in addition to
superplasticizer and adequate mixing [6]. The experiment given in [7] shows a decrease in compressive
strength with a decrease in w/c ratio, which is unlike the conventional dense-concrete behaviour.
Another experiment shows a w/c ratio that ranges from 0.2 to 0.4. They report that pervious concrete
mixtures with w/c ratios under 0.3 require water-reducing admixtures while those with w/c above 0.3
can be mixed without plasticizer [5,7]. In general, w/c in the range of 0.27–0.34 can be assumed as the
most common and wide range applicable for pervious concrete mixtures [3].
Another options of pervious concrete involve the improvement of water quality in ground-water
recharge [8]. Due to the storm-water runoff infiltration into the ground, the sediment is filtered
and contaminants do not pass into the groundwater. Similarly, due to water infiltration through the
concrete layer, pervious concrete parking lots can serve as recharge basins. Other benefits of pervious
concrete are following: better road safety because of increased skid resistance, road sound dampening,
and a reduction of the “heat island” effect [2,9,10].
This article presents a study that has been conducted to confirm the applicability of the w/c ratio in
the range of 0.35–0.25 for locally available concrete components. The influence of w/c ratio on the key
properties of pervious concrete was evaluated in terms of the following properties: compressive
and splitting tensile strength, unit weight, void content, and hydraulic conductivity. The void
content was assumed as constant, and, together with unit weight, was controlled for comparing
the theoretical (calculated) values and real experiment results. The results were also analysed in terms
of the dependence of the key properties. The specifications of correlation are given as well.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment focused on the utilization of locally available materials (Eastern Slovakia), as follows:

• cement CEM II/A-S 42.5 R complying [11], and

• natural aggregate (river gravel type, pebbles of limestone, quartz and various metamorphits)
complying [12].

To create an open structure of concrete, single-size coarse aggregate of fraction 4/8 was used.
To maintain the desirable performance of pervious concrete, 7% of sand was added to the aggregate
mixture. The properties of aggregate are given in Table 1. The sieve analysis of aggregate is given in Figure 1.

Table 1. Properties of aggregate used in experimental work.

Aggregate Fraction
Properties
0/4 4/8
Density (kg/m3 ) 2600 2580
Dry rodded unit weight (kg/m3 ) 1830 1580
Water absorption (%) 1.2 1.4
Void content (%) 30 39
Environments 2018, 5, 11 3 of 9

Figure 1. Sieve analysis of aggregate used in experiment.

The proportions of materials were calculated by the method given in [13]. Here, the void content
is one of the input parameters. In the experiment, three recipes of pervious concrete mixtures were
designed, where the void content was assumed as constant. The value was selected using the following
considerations: according to [14], void content for pervious concrete should be 18–23%; according
to [3], it should range between 15% and 25%. Assuming these boundaries, 20% void content was
chosen for the calculation of mix proportions; hence, the volume of the aggregate (0.575 m3 ) and the
volume of cement paste (0.225 m3 ) were constant for all of the mixtures. Mixtures differed from each
other only in terms of w/c ratio (0.35, 0.30, and 0.25) and of plasticizer dosage to control the workability.
Final proportions of mixtures for 1 m3 of fresh pervious concrete and the theoretical (calculated) unit
weight are given in Table 2.

Table 2. Proportions of pervious concrete mixtures per 1 m3 .

Mixture
Material Units
W35 W30 W25
Cement 327 354 384
Water 115 106 96
Aggregate 0/4 (kg/m3 ) 96 96 96
Aggregate 4/8 1375 1375 1375
Plasticizer 0.3 1.4 4.2
w/c (–) 0.35 0.30 0.25
Calculated unit weight (kg/m3 ) 1913 1931 1951
Calculated void content (%) 20 20 20

Samples of pervious concrete were mixed in the forced-action concrete mixer. The first step was to
mix the aggregate for about 15 s. Then, cement was added and mixed for another 15 s. Finally, the water
with superplasticizer was added and mixed thoroughly for 2 min, by a 3-min rest, and followed by a
1-min final mixing. Cylindrical specimens of 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height were prepared
in three layers, through constant compacting (15 hits for each layer). This compaction process was
chosen to determine if it is appropriate to achieve a 20% void content. Samples were demoulded
after 24 h and were then cured under standard moisture and temperature conditions (water curing
and 20 ± 3 ◦ C) until the corresponding testing time. The strength properties were tested after 2 and
28 days of curing. Pace rate during compressive strength test was set to 0.6 MPa/s and 0.06 MPa/s
for splitting tensile strength respectively. In addition, the compressive strength, as well as dry unit
weight, void content and hydraulic conductivity were tested after 120 days of curing. The void content,
together with unit weight were controlled by comparison of the theoretical (calculated) values and real
Environments 2018, 5, 11 4 of 9

experimental results. The results were also analysed by the dependence of individual properties and
the specification of correlation.
The unit weight of pervious concrete specimens was tested under oven-dry conditions. Samples
of pervious concrete were dried in the oven until they achieved a constant mass. That means the
difference between mass of specific sample after 24 h of drying is less than 0.1%. The void content of
pervious concrete specimens was tested and final values were calculated using following equation:

w2 − w1
 
Vr = 1 − 100
ρw V

where:
Vr —void content (%)
w2 —oven dried mass of sample (kg)
w1 —mass of sample submerged in water (kg)
ρw —density of water (kg/m3 )
V—volume of sample (m3 )
The hydraulic conductivity of pervious concrete specimens was tested using the falling-head
permeability test. For this purpose, our own apparatus was constructed, as illustrated in Figure 2.
The initial water level in the stand-pipe was 350 mm and the final water level was 50 mm. The time
needed for water level to fall from 350 mm to 50 mm was recorded. Values of hydraulic conductivity
were calculated and were expressed using the following equation:

aL h0
k= ln
At h1

where:
k—hydraulic conductivity (mm/s)
a—cross section area of stand pipe (mm2 )
L—length of specimen (mm)
A—cross section area of specimen (mm2 )
t—elapsed time (s)
h0 —water head height at the beginning of the test (mm)
ht —water head height at the end of the test (mm)
Initial water level in stand pipe was 350 mm and final water level was 50 mm. Time needed to fall
water level from 350 mm to 50 mm was recorded.

Figure 2. The apparatus and arrangement for testing the hydraulic conductivity of pervious concrete sample.
Environments 2018, 5, 11 5 of 9

3. Results and Discussion

In this chapter, the results in terms of compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, unit weight,
void content, and hydraulic conductivity are given. The appropriate discussion is attached to the
results where unexpected behaviour was observed. All of the results are given as an average of four
samples, while the standard deviation is given in the parentheses. The relationships between the key
features of pervious concrete are given in the end of this chapter.
During the mixing, the workability of fresh mixture was visually controlled. Mixture W35
(w/c = 0.35) showed a slightly runny character immediately after mixing; however, after a few minutes,
the excessive water was soaked by the aggregate. On the other hand, mixture W25 (w/c = 0.25) showed
a very stiff nature and despite the higher dosage of plasticizer (lignosulphonate base), it was difficult
to process it.

3.1. Compressive and Splitting Tensile Strength

The compressive and splitting tensile strength of concrete samples were tested. Compressive
strength was tested after 2, 28, and 120 days of curing, while the splitting tensile strength was tested
after 2 and 28 days of curing (Table 3).

Table 3. Results of compressive (fc ) and splitting tensile strength (ft ) including standard deviation.

fc after 2 Days fc after 28 Days fc after 120 Days

Sample ft after 2 Days ft after 28 Days
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
W35 9.5 (0.9) 1.3 (0.10) 14.5 (0.3) 2.0 (0.21) 20.0 (4.3)
W30 9.0 (0.6) 1.5 (0.21) 16.0 (1.2) 1.7 (0.53) 19.0 (1.9)
W25 10.5 (1.7) 1.4 (0.23) 17.5 (2.8) 1.6 (0.26) 19.5 (3.7)

The highest compressive strength after two days of curing was achieved by the W25 mixture
(10.5 MPa). The highest compressive strength after 28 days of curing was also achieved by the W25
mixture (17.5 MPa). After 120 days of curing, the highest compressive strength was achieved by the
W35 mixture (20.0 MPa). The differences between the compressive strength values of mixtures are
very slight and can probably be interpreted as negligible from the point of view of w/c ratio range.
The highest splitting tensile strength after two days of curing was achieved by the W30 mixture
(1.5 MPa). The highest splitting tensile strength after 28 days of curing was achieved by the W35
mixture (2.0 MPa). Since this mixture has the highest w/c (0.35), it probably can be explained by better
workability, and thus better bond between the aggregate and the cement paste. In the case of the W30
and W25 mixtures, stiffer cement paste showed a weaker adhesion to aggregate grains, which resulted
in lower splitting tensile strength. Similar behaviour is observed and discussed in [15,16]. However,
due to the very slight difference in splitting tensile strength between mixtures (difference was smaller
than measurement accuracy), it can be assumed that the present variation in the w/c ratio does not
have a significant influence on the splitting tensile strength. Testing the splitting tensile strength
enables the study of the nature of failure, since it is clearly visible. The failure crack came through most
of the aggregate grains; this indicates the good performance of cement stone. Therefore, the strength
of the aggregate seems to be a limiting factor here, and further increasing of the cement-paste strength
by lowering the w/c ratio would not necessarily lead to a better strength of concrete, as also shown
in [16].

3.2. Density and Void Content

The results of unit weight at dry conditions and void content are given in Table 4. Since these
properties directly affect the permeability, it is first evaluated whether they meet the theoretical values.
Mixtures W35 and W30 are close to the calculated unit weight (given in Table 2), while mixture W25
achieved slightly lower unit weight than expected. According to the calculations and theoretical
Environments 2018, 5, 11 6 of 9

assumptions, the unit weight should increase as the w/c ratio decreases. This behaviour is not
observed in our experiment. It can be explained by application of the same way of compaction for all
of the samples, while the stiffer W30 and W25 mixtures require more compaction effort to reach the
target unit weight. The void content of mixtures did not exactly achieve the calculated values (20%);
the values were higher—23% for mixtures W35 and W30 and 26% for the W25 mixture. The void
content theoretically should not change with w/c ratio variations because it comes from the mixture
design method, and because all the mixtures had the same volume of cement paste and aggregate.
The same explanation of different behaviour than expected can be stated here as above. However,
it only describes consistency between theoretical calculation and real experiment results. What is more
important is that the values of void content are practically the same, as expected.

Table 4. Results of unit weight, void content, and hydraulic conductivity, including standard deviation.

Sample ρv (Dry) (kg/m3 ) Vr (%) k (mm/s)

W35 1930 (56) 23 (3.9) 8.6 (6.3)
W30 1930 (36) 23 (1.8) 7.5 (1.2)
W25 1890 (42) 26 (2.6) 10.2 (2.1)

3.3. Hydraulic Conductivity

The hydraulic conductivity is the basic parameter to define the permeability of pervious concrete.
The results of hydraulic conductivity are given in Table 4. Values are comparable with those
presented in studies like [17,18]. The highest hydraulic conductivity was achieved by the W25 mixture
(10.2 mm/s). As in the case of void content, the hydraulic conductivity should be the same for all
of the mixtures and should not vary with changes in w/c ratio, since it is mainly the function of
interconnected void content, which has been assumed in the calculation at 20% for all of the mixtures.
In practice, the results of hydraulic conductivity in the experiment on average corresponds with those
of void content given in Table 4—higher is the void content, higher is the hydraulic conductivity.
Similarly, it is presented in [17] that the mixture with the highest hydraulic conductivity supports
the conclusion that the low w/c ratio would have led to decreased workability and lower density.
This lower density results in a greater amount of pore space available for water to pass through, thus
increase the hydraulic conductivity.
A wide range of hydraulic conductivity results was achieved with the W35 mixture (2.4–15 mm/s),
which is represented by high standard deviation. This is probably a consequence of higher w/c ratio
(0.35)—it makes the cement paste too runny and affects the void structure, and thus also the hydraulic
conductivity in an inappropriate way (the cement paste settles down and closes the open void structure).
It could be hard to repeat the same results with the same mixture.

3.4. Interactions between Pervious Concrete Properties

The dependence between void content, hydraulic conductivity, and compressive strength is
illustrated in the Figure 3, while the exponential regression model was applied. The experiment shows
very tight dependence between void content and hydraulic conductivity (R2 = 0.73), as well as between
void content and compressive strength (R2 = 0.72).
The dependence between unit weight, compressive strength, and void content is illustrated in the
Figure 4, while the linear regression model was applied. The experiment shows very tight dependence
between unit weight and compressive strength (R2 = 0.74), as well as between unit weight and void
content (R2 = 0.94).
Environments 2018, 5, 11 7 of 9

Figure 3. Interaction between hydraulic conductivity, void content, and the compressive strength of
pervious concrete samples.

Figure 4. Interaction between compressive strength, unit weight and void content of pervious
concrete samples.

4. Conclusions
The experiment shows results pertaining to the key properties of pervious concrete made of
locally available materials. As such, the test results could be useful for others working in the
same area. The influence of w/c ratio in the range 0.35 to 0.25 on pervious concrete properties
was tested. The findings should be weighted from the point of view of specific approach to design
of mix proportions that were used in this experiment—the constant volume of the aggregate and the
cement paste for all tested mixtures. Changes in the w/c ratio were made not only by changing the
amount of water to the same amount of cement, but the amount of cement was corrected accordingly
to keep the same volume of cement paste. The following conclusions can be formulated:

• Decrease in w/c ratio caused the fresh pervious concrete to be stiffer, and thus more difficult to
process—despite the use of higher volume of plasticizer. This probably resulted in unexpectedly
lower unit weight, higher void content, and higher hydraulic conductivity of the W25 mixture.
Environments 2018, 5, 11 8 of 9

• The tested range of w/c ratio caused only very slight differences in strength characteristics
of pervious concrete, though practically sufficient values were achieved: 14.5–17.5 MPa of
compressive strength and 1.6–2.0 MPa of splitting tensile strength.
• The strength of the aggregate seems to be a limiting factor in the further strengthening of pervious
concrete. This opinion is based on the crack formation that occurs at yield strength of samples.
• When applying 0.35–0.25 w/c ratio, hydraulic conductivity values ranging from 8.6 to 10.2 mm/s
were achieved.
• A good correlation was found for the key properties of pervious concrete, namely unit weight,
compressive strength, void content, and hydraulic conductivity. The regression analysis shows
high R2 values (0.72–0.94).
• Optimization of the kind and dose of chemical admixtures is necessary for the production of
pervious concrete with very low w/c ratio.

The results of strength characteristics found in the presented experiment are promising and
open up opportunities for future experimental work focusing on various locally available materials.
The achieved values of hydraulic conductivity can be usable in storm-water management of urban
areas when applying the pervious concrete for pavements, thus bringing environmental benefit to the
lives of people who reside in cities.

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the project ITMS Center of excellent integrated research of
progressive building constructions, materials and technologies (grant number 26220120037) and by the project
VEGA (grant number 1/0524/18).
Author Contributions: Marek Kováč conceived, designed and performed the experiment, analyzed data and
wrote the paper; Alena Sičáková wrote the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Brattebo, B.; Booth, D. Long-Term Stormwater Quantity and Quality Performance of Permeable Pavement
Systems. Water Res. 2003, 37, 4369–4376. [CrossRef]
2. Brown, D. Pervious Concrete Pavement: A Win-Win System. Concr. Technol. Today 2003, 24, 1–3.
3. Tennis, P.D.; Leming, M.L.; Akers, D.J. Pervious Concrete Pavements; Portland Cement Association: Skokie, IL,
USA, 2004.
4. Haselbach, L.; Freeman, R. Vertical Porosity Distribution in Pervious Concrete Pavement. ACI Mater. J. 2006,
103, 452–458.
5. Wang, K.; Schaefer, V.R.; Kevern, J.T.; Suleiman, M.T. Development of Mix Proportion for Functional and Durable
Pervious Concrete; NRMCA Concrete Technology Forum: Nashville, TN, USA, 2006.
6. Chindaprasirt, P.; Hatanaka, S.; Chareerat, T.; Mishima, N.; Yuasa, Y. Cement Paste Characteristics and
Porous Concrete Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 894–901. [CrossRef]
7. Joshi, T.; Dave, U. Evaluation of Strength, Permeability and Void Ratio of Pervious Concrete with Changing
w/c Ratio and Aggregate Size. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2016, 7, 276–284.
8. Legret, M.; Colandini, V.; Le Marc, C. Effects of a Porous Pavement with Reservoir Structure on the Quality
of Runoff Water and Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 190, 335–340. [CrossRef]
9. Yang, J.; Jiang, G. Experimental Study on Properties of Pervious Concrete Pavement Materials.
Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 381–386. [CrossRef]
10. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Storm Water
Best Management Practices; The United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
11. Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing. STN EN 197-1 Cement. Part 1: Composition, Specifications
and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements; Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing: Bratislava,
Slovakia, 2011.
12. Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing. STN EN 12620: Aggregates for Concrete; Slovak Office of
Standards, Metrology and Testing: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2008.
Environments 2018, 5, 11 9 of 9

13. Nguyen, D.H.; Sebaibi, N.; Boutouil, M.; Leleyter, L.; Baurd, F. A Modified Method for the Design of Pervious
Concrete Mix. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 73, 271–282. [CrossRef]
14. Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing. STN 73 6124-2: Road Construction. Part 2: Concrete
Drainage Layers; Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2013.
15. Neamitha, M.; Supraja, T.M. Influence of Water Cement Ratio and the Size of Aggregate on The Properties
Of Pervious Concrete. Int. Ref. J. Eng. Sci. 2017, 6, 9–16.
16. Chopra, M.; Wanielista, J.; Mulligan, A.M. Compressive Strength of Pervious Concrete Pavements; Storm Water
Managenent Academy, University of Central Florida: Orlando, FL, USA, 2007.
17. McCain, G.N.; Dewoolkar, M.M. Porous Concrete Pavements: Mechanical and Hydraulic Properties.
Available online: http://www.uvm.edu/~transctr/publications/TRB_2010/10-2228.pdf (accessed on
29 November 2017).
18. Batezini, R.; Balbo, J.T. Study on the hydraulic conductivity by constant and falling head methods for
pervious concrete. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais 2015, 8. [CrossRef]

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).