Scribd
Upload
417 views

Sections 5.4-5 PDF

The document discusses solving statically indeterminate structures using Castigliano's theorem and the force method. It explains that the force method replaces redundant members with their forces and calculates them using Castigliano's theorem, avoiding the need for many displacement unknowns. The document also provides examples of applying Castigliano's theorem to calculate reactions, displacements, and internal forces in statically indeterminate structures.

Uploaded by

Srinivas Neeli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
417 views

Sections 5.4-5 PDF

The document discusses solving statically indeterminate structures using Castigliano's theorem and the force method. It explains that the force method replaces redundant members with their forces and calculates them using Castigliano's theorem, avoiding the need for many displacement unknowns. The document also provides examples of applying Castigliano's theorem to calculate reactions, displacements, and internal forces in statically indeterminate structures.

Uploaded by

Srinivas Neeli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Truss example for dummy load method

• Determine vertical and horizontal deflections at


the point B of the truss.

• What makes this truss statically determinate?


Solution

• Need to dust off materials from statics,


including free body diagram and method of
joints
• Example
Statically indeterminate structures
• More internal forces than equations of equilibrium
• Many problems are lightly indeterminate in that the
number of equations of equilibrium is almost as high as
the number of unknown
• We can replace redundant members by their forces and
calculate them using Castigliano’s theorem.
• This is called the “force method,” and has been attractive
to researchers before the advent of widespread use of
finite element software
• Automating redundancy selection for general structures
has proved to be too difficult, so almost no FE software
employs any version of the force method, using instead
the “displacement method” with many more unknowns.
Castigliano theorem for solving
redundants
• When we have too many boundary
conditions, using Castigliano’s theorem to
do them is intuitive
• We add the force or moment at the
support as an additional unknown
• With a displacement or rotation
component fixed at the boundary, we can
set the derivative of the strain energy with
respect to the force to zero
Problem 5.59
• Select right reaction as redundancy

• Bending moment
M = Rz ( z < L / 2) M = Rz − P( z − L / 2) z > L / 2

• Castigliano theorem
∂M
M
∂U
L L/2 L
∂R dx ⇒ Rz ( z )dz +
0= =∫
∂R 0 EI ∫ ∫ ( Rz − P [ L / 2 − z ])zdz = 0
0 L/2

RL3 / 3 − 5PL3 / 48 = 0 R = 5 PL3 /16


Internal redundancies
• Internal force in member set as unknown
• When set as external force it is replaced by
pair of opposite forces
• Textbook shows that derivative of energy is
still zero
∂U
=0
∂Fi
Previous year exam question
• The bar below has length L, cross-sectional
area A, and the axial force P is applied at
point C, which is at a distance of 0.6L from the
left (point A). Young’s modulus of the section
AC is E, and of the section CB is 2E.
– Use Castigliano’s theorem to calculate the reaction at B.
– Use Castigliano’s theorem to calculate the displacement at C.
– Calculate the strain in BC

RB

P
A C B
Solution for RB
RB

P
A C B
RB2 (0.4 L) 0.1RB2 L
Energy in segment BC: =
2(2 EA) EA
(P-R B ) 2 (0.6 L) 0.3(P-R B ) 2 L
Energy in Segment AC: =
2 EA EA
∂U 0.2 RB + 0.6( RB − P )
Zero displacement at B: = =0
∂RB EA / L
RB = 0.75 P

• Why is that reasonable?


Solution for displacement and strain
RB2 (0.4 L) 0.1RB2 L
Energy in segment BC: =
2(2 EA) EA
(P-R B ) 2 (0.6 L) 0.3(P-R B ) 2 L
Energy in Segment AC: =
2 EA EA
∂U 0.6( P − RB ) 0.15 PL
Displacement at C: uC = = =
∂P EA / L EA
0 − uC P
ε= = 0.375
0.4 L EA

• Alternative way to
calculate strain?
Reading assignment
Section 6.1: Question: What are the assumptions we make to
solve torsion of prismatic bars of circular cross section (be
sure to explain first what is a prismatic bar)

Source: www.library.veryhelpful.co.uk/ Page11.htm

You might also like