0% found this document useful (0 votes)
334 views

Api Q2 at

- The document appears to be an attendance sheet for an API Spec Q2 Awareness Training held by OIS on July 18, 2017. - It lists 12 attendees from various oil and gas companies, along with their signature and details like name, company, and ID number. - The trainer listed is Premal Shukla.

Uploaded by

Dheeraj Menon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
334 views

Api Q2 at

- The document appears to be an attendance sheet for an API Spec Q2 Awareness Training held by OIS on July 18, 2017. - It lists 12 attendees from various oil and gas companies, along with their signature and details like name, company, and ID number. - The trainer listed is Premal Shukla.

Uploaded by

Dheeraj Menon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

OILFIELEI

l;usPEETtofil
SERrrrc'E5

Training Attendance Sheet

Title : API Spec Q2, Awareness Training

Location: OIS Conference Room.

ATTENDEE'S DETAILS
NO. NAME COMPANY NAME ID NO. SIGNATURE

1
c)rg bjts$d
z
iv {ol,*r ors 84e 6 o qo,t
{
Ir t1 6Mler,+ ffi^*V
4
Vrl de'pvHffi "lt
Atar')'-N"\rr ot( A4o+*qt
o ku*co* N. \ooo, Ors
I
\*.ot C\+..o- Ors Gezesgl *\$r
I
o

10

11

12

TRAINER Name

PremalShukla

DATE: 18th July, 2017.


SITAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTANCY
TRAINING FEEDBACK
We request you to spare few minutes of your precious time and give us an unbiased
opinion. Please complete this form a:nd return it to the ConsulteLnt / Faculty. The
information provided will be used by us to upgrade the course.

Administrative Information
Company Name C),.c,c-o \n sc€'.s\or. e.Gr.r...t,. Faculty Name P.ero. -3u.-rts
Training .Program f_\pr3cc.ez\7r Participant Name Dtre e esr O\c r.o-
Date lBtc
-Jur'r >o!g Duration 2 I\rs
Feedback on the Session/Program ( Tick as applicablel
sl. Attributes Excellent Good Average Poor
No. el {31 t2l t1l
I Coverage of the program
2. Content of the course
Presenter's Knowledse
4 Ability of the Presenter to clarify
do'ubts
5 Interaction with participants
6. Tirne Management
17
t Visuals used
8. Course Materials /Notes distributed
9. Case studies / Exercises
10 Relevance of the prosram

In case of any Average/ Poor rating, specif the incident which led to such decision :

About the Course objectives:


Were the same presented in an understarrdable manner? Yes/No
Were the same presented with example, lively?
',{es/No
Did the course meet your expectation? Jes/Nrr
Other suggestions for improvement:
SITAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTANCY
TRAINING FEEDBACK
We requr:st you to spare few minutes of your precious time and give us an unbiased
opinion. Please complete this form and return it to the ConsulteLnt / Faculty. The
information provided will be used by us to upgrade the course.

Administrative Information
Companv Name
@-r\^ Faculty Name
>uul.t
tr p1
t
Training Program Ml I W'L f4Lrut(onast Participant Name 'Ml[> 'lkl'llK
Date As, lo7l4" Duration L Hrs'
Feedback on the Session/Program ( Tick as applicablel
sl. Attributes Excellent Good Average Poor
No. t4l t3l I2l (1)
I Coverage of the prograffr t/

2. Content of the course l-/


3. Presenter's Knowledse t,/'
4. Ability of the Presenter t;o clarify
doubts La-
5 In1-eraction with participants t/
6 Tirne Management
7 Visuals used t-2r,,
6 Course Materials / Notes distributed
9. Case studies / Exercises L/
10 Relevance of the proqrarn l,/
In case of any Average/ Poor rating, specifli the incident which led to such decision :

About the Course objectives:


Were the same presented in an understandable manner? No
Were the same presented with example, lively? No
Did the course meet your exper:tation? No

Other suggestions for improvement:

* Go v i'd", A^rrl c.v[2tl '+ qn/{S A tu-a.'bz-V!) "


vt\

Client Representative's Signature:

SAC/FOO7/R.O
SITAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTANCY
TRAINING FEEDBACK
We requr:st you to spare few minutes of your precious time and give us an unbiased
opinion. Please complete this form a:nd return it to the Consuliant / Faculty. The
information provided will be used by us to upgrade the course.

Administrative Information
Company Name
Training .Program
I
o\g Faculty Name
Particirrant Name
| ?zefo^ Srrt,tto
A0T-at Vuo,car, \t \o--*,:,l
Date Duration
\9'i?/l-tQ L L-".tt
plicable)
sl. Attributes Excellent Good Average Poor
No. t4l f3l t2l lll
I Coverage of the program 't-/
2. Content of the course i-/
3. Presenter's Knowledge t/
4 Ability of the Presenter to clarify
doubts t/
5 Interaction with participants La
6 Tirne Management
,7
a./'
t Visuals used L-
8. Course Materials/Notes distributerC V-
9. Case studies / Exercises t-/
10. Relevance of the program t/
In case of any Average/ Poor rating, specifl' the incident which led to such decision :

About the Course objectives:


Were the same presented in an understarr.dable manner? No
Were the same presented with example, lively? No
Did the course meet your exnectation? /No
Other suggestions for improvement:

s\
Client Representative's Signature:

SAC/FOO7/R.O -\JJ
SITAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTANCY
TRAINING FEEDBACK
We request you to spare few minutes of your precious time and give us an unbiased
opinion. Please complete this form and return it to the Consultemt / Faculty. The
information provided will be used by us to upgrade the course.

Administrative Information
Company Name --
)rt-?tQt ;t lnio'r <Foritri\- Faculty Name P' .{tt ttrto
Training Program (nEc hl/*N,to. '{*ptr
APt Participant Name
" D.
Date
t8l#t"un / Duration J 1h",.,
am ( Tick as applicablel
sl. Attributes Excellent Good Average Poor
No. t4l (31 t2l tll
I Coverage ofthe program
2 Content of the course
3 Presenter's Knowledge
4. Ability of the Presenter to clarify
doubts \t/-
5. Int.eraction with participants
6 Tirne Management

7 Visuals used
8. Course Materials / Notes distributed v.
9 Case studies / Exercises
lo. Relevance of the program

In case of any Average/ Poor rating, speci$ the incident which led to such decision :

About the Course objectives:


Were the same presented in an understandable manner? s/No
Were the same presented with example, lively?
Did the course meet vour expectation?

Other suggc:stions for improvement:

Client Reltresentative's Signature:

SAC/F007/n.0
SITAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTAI{CY
TRAINING FEEDBACK
We requr:st you to spare few minutes of your precious time and give us an unbiased
opinion. Please complete this form and return it to the consulteLnt / Faculty. The
information provided will be used by us to upgrade the course.

Administrative Information
Company Name
ots Faculty Name P, Sltt,tRt A
Training Program nPl-6 Participant Name A u d.\\.,\ r. \-\\.,\
Date
tk/o / z-Ptl'4 Duration ?.Wv<
m ( Tick as applicable)
sl. Attributes Excellent Good Average Poor
No. t4l t3l t2l tll
I Coverage of the prograrn t-..''
2. Content ofthe course
3 Prr:senter's Knowledse
4 Ability of the Presenter to clarify
doubts
5. Interaction with participants
6 Tirne Management
.7
Visuals used
8. Course Materials / Notes distributed ./
9. Case studies / Exercises
10 Relevance of the program

In case of any Average/ Poor rating, speci$r the incident which led to such decision :

About the Course objectives:


Were the same presented in an understandable manner?
Were the same presented with example, lively?
Did the course meet your expectation?

Other suggestions for improvement:

Client Representative's Signatu re:

SAC/FOO7/R.O
SITAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTANCY
TRAINING FEEDBACK
We requr:st you to spare few minutes of your precious time and give us an unbiased
opinion. Please complete this form a:nd return it to the consultemt / Faculty. The
information provided will be used by us to upgrade the course.

Administrative Information
Company Name c.7.3. Faculty Name ?.6netktA
Training Program A?I da Ar^saeelvSs Participant Name tlc2"nt lb:lL6et
Date t8l7 I t1 Duration &ttcs
Feedback on the SgEggnl$ggram ( Tick as applicablef
sl. Attributes Excellent Good Average Poor
No. 6l t3l I2l t1l
1. Coverage of the prograffl
2. Content of the course
Presenter's Knowledse
4 Ability of the Presenter to clarify
doubts
5. Inl.eraction with participants (
6. Tirne Management

- Visuals used /.
R Course Materials/Notes distributed
9. Case studies/Exercises ilf A
10. Relevance of the proqrarn a
In case of any Average/ Poor rating, specifu the incident which led to such decision :

About the Course objectives:


Were the same presented in an understandable manner? Yes/D
Were the same presented with example, lively? Yes/*
Did the course meet your expectation? Yes/fr
Other stions for

SAC/FOO7IR.O

You might also like