Traffic Impact Assessment Report: Prima Reka Konsultan
Traffic Impact Assessment Report: Prima Reka Konsultan
6433, 36537, 149853, 149854, 149856 - 149860, 149866 - 149878, DAN SEBAHAGIAN LOT-LOT 149851, 149852,
149855, 149861, 149862 & SEBAHAGIAN TANAH KERAJAAN, MUKIM HULU KINTA, DAERAH KINTA, PERAK
DARUL RIDZUAN.
REF : TIA/PRK/7070/17/01
DECEMBER 2017
PREPARED FOR
TI HOMES SDN BHD
NO.3, Jalan Lassam, Greentown,
30450, Ipoh
Perak Darul Ridzuan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Key Plan & Location 2
Figure 2.1 Location & Site Accessibility 5
Figure 2.2 Development Component 6
Figure 3.1 Census Station Location 8
Figure 3.2 ATC Setup (Metrocount) 10
Figure 3.3 Video Count at Junction 11
Figure 3.4 Field Reconnaisance 12
Figure 4.1 Existing Road 14
Figure 4.3 Weekday Travel Demand A1 17
Figure 4.4 Daily total peak hour volume 18
Figure 4.5 Traffic Composition 19
Figure 4.6 Hourly Volume 20
Figure 4.7 Analysis Location 23
Figure 4.8 Existing Junction LOS 24
Figure 5.1 Trip Distribution 29
Figure 6.1 Year 2019 Junction Analysis 35
Figure 6.2 Year 2024 Junction Analysis 36
Figure 6.3 Year 2029 Junction Analysis 37
Figure 6.4 Proposed Layout 39
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 PCU Factor for Junction Design 9
Table 4.1 LOS Table 15
Table 4.2 LOS for Signalized Junction 16
Table 4.3 Existing LOS for route under study 21
Table 4.4 Existing Intersection under study 22
Table 5.1 Extracted Trip Rates 26
Table 5.2 Trip Generation 27
Table 6.1 Midblock Analysis A1 33
Table 7.1 Development Fair Share 41
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) is a valuable tool for analyzing traffic generated by
a particular proposed development with new accesses or increased use of the
available existing accesses. A TIA generally includes a description of the scope and
density of the featured project, a summary of the projected impacts and required
mitigation measures to ensure all the possible routes involved can safely
accommodate the proposed development or components of it.
Taking into cognizance the traffic that would be generated and attracted by this
development and upcoming adjacent projects, Prima Reka Konsultan has been
appointed to undertake a traffic impact assessment for the proposed development
and henceforth to present the results of the study to the relevant authority for their
consideration.
The study would focus on gauging the performance of available access junctions
and the potential impact of additional trips from the proposed development.
This study would focus on traffic volume analysis for the main routes toward the
proposed development area.
This study investigates the impact on the proposed development towards Jalan
Jelapang – Ulu Chepor (A1) along the designated stretch. The volume of traffic will
take into consideration the intended land use of development by TI Homes Sdn.
Bhd.
Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor (A1) comprise of 2-lane Single Carriageway which
designed for JKR R4 Standard. This route acts as a link that connect Chemor to
Ipoh Town / Jelapang.
The proposed development plan as in Figure 2.2 illustrates the components of land
use planned within the development, which intended for residential and business
plot.
3.1 Introduction
The performance of the current road facility in catering for the existing traffic
demand provides valuable information and vital for the traffic analysis. On this
account, it is necessary to undertake traffic surveys to ascertain the traffic demand
at the main and collector routes adjoining to the development area.
The traffic count surveys for this study were conducted on 24th, 25th and 26th of
October 2017; to obtain the traffic volume on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday
(24 hours). This was done to ascertain the pattern of the daily traffic volume and its
peak hour traffic period. Based on surveys analysis, the peak-hour traffic period for
the main road was determined.
Traffic count surveys were conducted at junction location toward the proposed
development compound as shown in Figure 3.1.
The continuous traffic count surveys were expected to yield the following results: -
• Determine the existing traffic profile and demand along the main route.
• Assess the current traffic flow characteristics
• Ascertain the current vehicle composition to identify if there are any special
characteristics in terms of vehicle composition that needs to be catered for in
the recommendation of the future junction layout.
• Provide an overview on the current performance of the available routes in terms
of traffic volume analysis.
Existing traffic movements at the locality were also observed to determine the shifts
in traffic that will take place when the existing or whenever new access junctions are
utilized.
The traffic and movement counts involved manual enumeration of vehicles by their
respective classifications at fifteen minutes intervals as well as automated traffic
counting using Metrocount MC5600.
The classified counts were converted into their equivalent passenger car units (pcu).
This is to account for the different effects of the various vehicle types have influence
the traffic conditions. Thus, the converted pcu units were utilized in the process of
evaluating the level of traffic on the relevant roadways and junctions surveyed.
The adopted equivalent pcu factors for the vehicle categories are consistent with the
Jabatan Kerja Raya's Arahan Teknik 8/86 (Revision 2015) and Malaysian Highway
Capacity Manual as presented in Table 3.1 below.
Table 3.1 The Adopted Equivalent PCU factor for Junction Design
VEHICLE CATEGORY EQUIVALENT PCU FACTOR
Motorcycles 0.22
Motorcars and taxis 1.001.00
Vans and Utilities 1.19
Buses 2.08
Trailers 2.27
The future traffic demand was ascertained by incorporating an annual traffic growth
to the existing volumes. The existing directional traffic movements were also the
underlying basis from which the directional traffic distribution to and from the
proposed development was established. Figure 3.2 below shows the ATC setup at
site while Figure 3.3 shows the video recording device setup.
The following Figure 4.1 below shows the existing road condition. From the
conducted site reconnaissance, Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor (A1) have 2-lane 2-
way setup for route section at study area.
Generally, the roadways in the vicinity of the site can be considered either as a
local or collector road whereby the acceptable volume to capacity ratio is between
0.70 to 0.90 that is the level of service between LOS 'C' and LOS 'D' as per Arahan
Teknik (Jalan) 8/86.The capacity of a road is calculated to determine the maximum
amount of traffic that can be accommodated by various sections of a road. The
capacity of a road is dependent upon several factors such as the carriageway
width, gradient of road, number of lanes road environment etc.
Table 4.1 describes the different operating conditions for various ranges of V/C
ratios and its associated level of service under urban conditions.
B Stable traffic flow with a high degree of freedom to select speed and operating condition
but with some influence from other users.
Restricted flow that remain stable but with significant interaction with others in the traffic
C stream. The general level of comfort and convenience decline noticeably at this level.
Speed and maneuverability are closely controlled by the higher volume. Most of the
drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed, change lane or pass.
High density flow in which speed and freedom to maneuver are severyly restricted and
D comfort and convenience have decline even though flows remain stable. This level
represents unstable flow with operating speed being maintained, though considerably
affected by changes in operating condition.
Unstable flow at or near capacity levels with poor level of comfort and convenience. This
E
level represents operation at lower operating speed with volume at or near the capacity of
the highways. Flow is unstable and stoppage may occur for a momentary duration.
Forced traffic flow in which the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount
that can be served. LOS F is characterized by poor time travel with low comfort,
F convenience and increase in accident exposure. This condition describes a forced flow
operation at low speed where volumes are below the capacity. Speed is reduced
substantially and stoppage may occur for short or long periods of time because of
downstream traffic condition.
Source: Malaysia HCM 2011
A ≤ 10.0
B >10.0-20.0
C >20.0-35.0
D >35.0-55.0
E >55.0-80.0
F > 80.0
The study has identified the existing traffic volume at junctions surrounding the
development area that may be used subsequently to provide working database and
basis information for further study on the Traffic Forecast and Analysis of Future
Scenario especially for the intended development.
Peak-hour Field traffic study have been conducted on Tuesday, Wednesday and
Thursday (Peak - Hour Survey Count) to obtain the site data and ascertain the
current level of service on the available routes. Figure 4.3 shows the variation of
traffic volume obtained at allocated census stations.
Three days continuous traffic count was conducted to ascertain the occurrence of
peak-hour traffic at the particular census station. Highest peak hour volume was
observed during morning, midday, and evening survey period, while been lower
along the rest of the day.
From the Metrocount Data, the traffic along Route A1 fluctuate throughout the day,
highest during the day period and getting lower toward nighttime. Highest hourly peak was
observed at morning peak, recorded at 2377 pcu/hr on Wednesday.
Highest total daily vehicle recorded on Tuesday 24h October 2017 with 27,462 vehicles
along Jalan Jelapang – ulu Chepor. Fluctuation of daily volume was observed on
Thursday with 27,416 vehicles, followed by Wednesday which shows recorded volume at
26,845 vehicles.
Above Pie-Chart shows obtained traffic composition along Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor.
Majority of the traffic volume contributed by car (76%) and motorcycles (15%), another 7%
from Medium vehicles, while buses and Heavy Vehicles at (2%) were observed. The high
percentage of passenger cars and motorcycles had shown the vehicle types to be
preferred mode for daily commuter and intended trips along the stretch.
From the routes under study, for Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor, the traffic shows
fluctuation of traffic in bound of as low as 126 pcu/hr during nighttime (4 a.m.) and
can peaked up to 2377 pcu/hr during daytime (7 p.m.). The directional split trend
shows that during the morning period, more vehicles travel Westbound (toward
Jelapang/Ipoh) while fluctuate back in balance during other hours.
Midblock analysis was carried out at location as denoted in Figure 4.7 and the
result presented in Table 4.3 for the current year situation.
The existing route shows Level of Service (LOS) F for the midblock analysis at
Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor (Route A1).
Analysis was also carried out, simulating the existing priority junctions using
SIDRA software to get the idea on their current performance. Table 4.4 belows
show the summary of the existing junction information and current performance.
Level of
No. Intersection/Location Abbreviation Type of Intersection
Service
Non-Signalized Junction.
T-Junction to Kg.
1. J1 All turning/non-restricted LOS B
Hijrah
turning movement
Non-Signalized Junction.
T-Junction to to
4. J4 All turning/non-restricted LOS C
Chepor Indah
turning movement
Based on the analysis, both junctions are currently performing at acceptable Level
of Service.
Figure 4.8 shows the Level of Service for each analyzed junction as well as the
LOS for each directional approach.
The traffic impact analysis investigates the performance of the road during the
weekday periods. This is due to the land use that has been planned for the
proposed development.
The following factors were considered in forecasting the traffic demand for the
analysis:
• An annual traffic growth of 2.5% was used to gauge projection for road
planning and development (Referred to recommendation from RTVM 2015).
• The analysis was conducted for a typical weekday (AM peak analysis)
• The distribution of the development traffic via proposed access and exit way.
The estimation of trip generated and attracted to the proposed development was
based on trip rates for the designated land use. These trip rates were based on the
trip rates obtained from the Malaysian Trip Generation Manual, 2010 produced by
the Highway Planning Unit of Malaysia. Table 5.1 tabulates the trip rates used for
the designated land use proposed in the development.
Trip Production and Attraction for the proposed development is as shown in Table 5.2.
Morning Peak period generates total of 601 trips while evening period shows 639
trips from the proposed development component. Analysis will be carried out on the
peak hour for critical situation.
To account for the internal trips that would be generated and attracted within the
proposed development, for the housing units, it was assumed that 10% of the trips
generated from the proposed housing development unit would be internally bound.
In other words, the analysis assumes that 10% of all trips generated from the
proposed development would be attracted by the land use within the development or
immediately in adjacent (Shop Lots, Food Courts). It is believed that this would
adequately represent the internal trips generated and attracted within the proposed
development. On the other hand, for the commercial area, it was assumed that 30%
would be internally bound due to the location of shops and food courts plot inward,
closer to the development rather than being located by roadside, thus assumed to
served more toward internal and adjacent vicinity trips.
The traffic generated and attracted to the proposed development was then
distributed and assigned to the road network system to analyze their impact on
access junction leading to the proposed development. The traffic count surveys
provided the existing traffic pattern of the area.
The trip generated will be distributed through the existing junctions that provide the
connectivity to the bigger town network. Figure 5.1 shows the trip distribution from
the proposed development for both housing and commercial plots.
Trip assignment involves the determination of the amount of traffic that will use
certain routes of the road network. By taking into account the entry and exit points of
the development including the traffic from the existing housing areas to the exit-way,
the trips were assigned accordingly. The existing situation has been analyzed using
information obtained from the surveys. In assigning trips for future conditions the
following assumptions have been made; the distribution of traffic in and around the
study area will remain similar in the future; and drivers would choose the shortest
route available to reach their destination. Based on these assumptions and
incorporating the traffic growth factor, the future traffic scenario was analyzed and
the appropriate access layout is identified.
The analysis involves LOS projection upon the development and existing junctions.
The traffic forecasting exercise for the analysis has incorporated the following
considerations:
• The traffic distribution, taking into consideration the nature of route selection
relevant to the existing traffic movement.
From the analysis, the traffic projection shows the existing number of carriageway at
Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor (A1) need to be upgraded to 4-lane Dual Carriageway
in order to maintain acceptable LOS. Table 6.1 deliberated the projected traffic
volume and Mid-Block Analysis over the years.
The traffic generated from the development are assigned and distributed to the
identified exit and entry point of the development. The generated traffic volume is
added to the projected traffic volume to represent the predicted volume of the
existing road. These volumes will later be evaluated to identify the traffic impact
assessment towards the proposed junctions through the design years (until 2029).
The traffic analysis was conducted on selected routes based on the traffic
generation, the traffic growth and the trip distribution in the locality.
This junctions need to be designed to allow it to perform at a high level service. The
performance of the existing junction is evaluated in terms of queuing and degree of
saturation (v/c ratio), following which the level of service at which this junction would
operate can be ascertained. The analysis on the performance of the junction and the
efficiency of the recommended layout was determined using SIDRA.
The analysis on the junctions is conducted for the peak traffic hours during the
weekday for the development. The analysis on the performance of the signalized
junction was determined by considering a worst case between AM and PM peak
hour traffic.
Analysis summarized in Figure 6.1 through Figure 6.2 shows that J1 and J2 (Existing
Junction) need to be upgraded. Junction 3 is proposed to be closed due to being very
near to J2, while proposed J5 (New Junction) already can be provide the required
accessibility as a common junction. Junction 4 is proposed to be a left-in left-out junction
for safety.
In Figure 6.3, it shows that additional number of lane required at J5 to cater for the
projection years beyond 2029. However, periodic validation down the years on the actual
traffic projection and Level of Service is recommended for calibration.
Figure 6.4 shows the proposed access layout for this development by TI Homes Sdn.
Bhd.
7.1 Summary
Earlier at the beginning of the study, the consultant has outlined several study
objectives which to be fulfilled and achieved as the report deliverables:-
• To ascertain the existing traffic volume along Jalan Jelapang – Ulu Chepor (A1) ;
and to review its current midblock performance;
- Link Analysis / Midblock Analysis had been carried out at these routes.
(Table 6.1) Based on the analysis, Route A1 under study is already
recommended to be upgraded to 4-lane Dual Carriageway setup.
• To distribute the generated and attracted traffic from the development to the
relevant main routes by way of traffic distribution and assignment;
- The trip generated will be distributed and assigned to the existing gateway
based on proportion of trip origin – trip destination as shown in Figure 5.1.
- Junction analysis has been carried out to the J1, J2, J3, J4 (Existing) and J5
(Proposed Development Access) which deliberated in the analysis part
Chapter 6.
The traffic impact assessment study has identified the projected traffic associated
with the proposed development and provides an evaluation on the impact of this
additional traffic on the existing and future road network.
The recommendations on the junction layout and lane configuration for the access
junctions have taken into consideration the various factors that affect the volume of
traffic. This includes the proposed developments, road links, junction upgrading and
the land use of the proposed development.
1) The junctions under study, namely J1, J2, J3, J4 (Existing) and J5 (Proposed
Development Access) are analyzed against traffic projection and trip
generation by the development along the study period of 5 and 10 years.
(2019-completion, 2024, and 2029). The proposed upgrade and mitigation is
deliberated in Figure 6.1 through to 6.4.
2) Based on the projection of traffic growth along study route; Jalan Jelapang –
Ulu Chepor (A1), the midblock analysis shows the roadway capacity need to
be upgraded. (Table 6.1)