Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
For problem number 1 and 2, the Average Weighted Mean method wasused; a
four-point scale and five-point scale Likert scale was used in theanalysis. The
problem number 3 and the null hypothesis were tested for itssignificance using the
Pearson Product Correlation method.
Conclusions
Relative to the analyses and interpretation of data, the followingconclusions were
drawn:
1. Cellphones were always used by the students, computers weresometimes used by
the students and tablets were seldom used by thestudents in learning.
2. The use of gadgets has a moderately positive impact in learning becauseof its
features that extend the ability of the students to do more things butit also has a
slightly negative impact because students are most likely tobe distracted by it.
3. There was no significant correlation between the frequency of use and theimpact of
gadgets which means the frequency of the use of gadgets doesnot affect its impact but
instead, it was based on how we use it.
Recommendations
With all of the foregoing analysis, interpretation, and conclusions of thisstudy, the
following are strongly recommended for possible course of action.
1. Future researchers can conduct a similar study and improve some flaws.
2. Another research should be conducted as follow-up study to investigatefurther the
impact of gadgets in learning.
3. Future researchers can use this study for references.