Scribd
Upload
149 views1 page

CRITERIA For Gallery Walk

This document contains a rubric for scoring a gallery walk for a senior high school basic education department research project. The rubric evaluates projects on presentability, functionality, practicality, and cost efficiency on a scale of 1 to 10. For each criteria, descriptions are provided for scores of 10, 7, 5, and 2. The rubric also includes spaces for two peer students from other groups to provide scores and evaluate their classmates' projects.

Uploaded by

Allency Nacpil
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
149 views1 page

CRITERIA For Gallery Walk

This document contains a rubric for scoring a gallery walk for a senior high school basic education department research project. The rubric evaluates projects on presentability, functionality, practicality, and cost efficiency on a scale of 1 to 10. For each criteria, descriptions are provided for scores of 10, 7, 5, and 2. The rubric also includes spaces for two peer students from other groups to provide scores and evaluate their classmates' projects.

Uploaded by

Allency Nacpil
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

HOLY ANGEL UNIVERSITY

BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT


SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
S.Y. 2019 – 2020
Gallery Walk
Scoring Rubric
Strand/Grade and Section: Date:
Proposed Research Title: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Leader: _________________________________________________
Members: _________________________________________________ __________________________________________________
_________________________________________________ __________________________________________________
_________________________________________________ __________________________________________________
_________________________________________________ __________________________________________________

CRITERIA 10 7 5 2
The Product is aesthetically The Product is properly The Product is somehow The Product is not packaged at
Presentability pleasing to the eyes and is packaged. packaged. all.
excellently packaged.
The Product’s overall The Product serves its The Product somehow does The Product does not function
Functionality performance is exceeding its function exactly as its function. at all.
qualifications. described.
The Product solves the The Product could solve the The Product somehow solves The product does not in any
Practicality issue/problem presented in issue/problem presented in the issue/ problem presented way solve the issue/problem.
the research. the research. in the research.
The Product has no expenses The Product has minimal The Product has expenses and The Product is expensive and is
Cost Efficiency at all and is made of purely expenses and is made of is somehow made of recycled not in any form made of
recycled materials. mostly recycled materials. materials. recycled materials.
Peer Scores
Two (2) students from each group will be assessing the project of their classmates from a scale of 1-10 depending if they are satisfied or not based on
the following: Presentability,Functionality,Practicality and Cost Efficiency.
Student A: Score 1 ________/10 Student B: Score 2 _______/10__

You might also like