Writing in Accounting and Finance
Writing in Accounting and Finance
For example:
When making a recommendation regarding a company’s plans to move into a new market, you
must ground your recommendation in proper analysis of the financial data.
When writing a memo informing a small business client of a serious internal control weakness,
you must evaluate the situation in terms of the potential audit and asset protection consequences.
Take care to distinguish between your opinion and evidence that is grounded in what a text actually says
or in what the data actually tell you. Be rigorous in making this distinction. Clearly express an evidence-
based conclusion when analyzing data for compliance or reasonableness.
Conciseness
Effective writers in accounting and finance professions make their points using as few words as possible.
Make careful decisions about which ideas to include and omit, avoid wordiness, and choose words that
precisely represent your ideas. Do not waste your reader’s time.
1While this document serves as an introduction to writing in accounting and finance, it is not comprehensive. Refer to the
following excellent sources for additional instruction, examples, and advice:
Claire B. May and Gordon S. May, Effective Writing: A Handbook for Accountants (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2012).
Joseph D. Andrew Jr., Claire B. May, and Gordon S. May, Effective Writing: A Handbook for Finance People (New Jersey:
Prentice Hall, 1999).
2 Claire B. May and Gordon S. May, Effective Writing: A Handbook for Accountants (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2012), 1.
Common Writing Tasks
While each of the following types of writing requires a specific format, all should adhere to the
characteristics of successful writing listed above.
Letters
Letters allow professionals to build relationships, respond to requests, make recommendations, to initiate
actions. Accountants and finance professionals write letters to multiple recipients such as clients,
colleagues, and government agencies. Like memos and emails, a letter becomes an official document
that may be referenced at a later date and by readers other than your original audience. Professional
standards or firm practices may dictate the format and content of some letters.
Reports
Accountants and finance professionals produce reports for clients and internal audiences. Usually,
reports apply finance or accounting principles to a specific problem or question. Reports often require
that the writer engage in research and always require that information be logically organized and
sometimes separated into discrete sections. Longer reports should include an executive summary.
For example:
An accountant working for an internal audit function might produce a report suggesting
improvements to a process or internal controls. A finance professional might produce a report for
a client who is considering selling her business and who would like information on the various
methods of establishing a market value for a private company.
For most of these timed writing situations, you will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Responsiveness – address completely the question asked or scenario presented
Development – provide and discuss appropriate evidence in support of your thesis/answer
Organization – introduce your thesis/answer, present your ideas in separate paragraphs marked
by clear topic sentences, and create smooth transitions between ideas
Polish – carefully proofread your essay for correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics
Some of these exam questions are graded primarily on the execution of writing rather than the content of
the response. The quality of your ideas is still important; however, ideas presented in a document marred
by disorganization, typos, and grammatical mistakes will result in a lower grade on the question.
For example, even information from the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards
CodificationTM and from the United Sates Securities and Exchange Commission must properly be
documented.
Due to the unique regulatory environment in these professions, regulators frequently review documents
accounting and finance professionals generate. Inaccuracies or confusing documentation can have
negative consequences for your employer.
Some Tips
Do I respond to the assignment? Do I summarize when I’ve been asked to analyze, evaluate, or
recommend? Do I recommend when I’ve been asked only to inform?
Does my writing follow the proper conventions for the type of document specified (letter, memo,
report, etc.)?
Do I strike the appropriate tone for the audience and situation? Do I use professional rather than
casual language?
How do I know my claims are true? Do I use evidence that is grounded in my analysis of the data
and in professional standards rather than in personal experience? Do I cite the authoritative
literature?
Does my document have a meaningful organization that breaks my ideas into logically organized
paragraphs and purposefully moves a reader from one idea to the next?
Do I waste space on excessive summary of sources? Do I make purposeful choices about when
to summarize, paraphrase, and quote sources?
Do I effectively use tables and charts to summarize complex data or findings?
Do I distinguish my ideas from those of the authors/theories/articles I discuss?
Have I carefully proofread my document to eliminate confusing sentences, grammatical mistakes,
punctuation errors, and typos?
Improper use of a theory or principle– If you are applying a particular accounting or finance
principle, be sure you have a good understanding of this principle.
Failure to address the assignment – Be sure to write in response to the question asked, the
problem posed, or the scenario provided.
Excessive summarizing/lack of analysis – If your task is to evaluate and analyze data, simply
summarizing the information will not be adequate.
Lack of adequate support – Provide and explain evidence that shows you have analyzed the data
and applied the appropriate professional principles. Cite authoritative standards, laws, and rules
supporting your conclusion or recommendation.
Use of personal opinion or anecdotes – Personal opinions or anecdotes generally do not qualify
as rigorous and appropriate evidence in support of a claim. Your opinion does not qualify as data.
Lack of an adequately complex thesis – For essay assignments, a good thesis moves your reader
beyond a simple observation. It asserts an arguable perspective that requires some work on your
part to demonstrate its validity.
Inappropriate tone and language – An effective business document is tailored to the purpose and
audience at hand.
Use of unreliable electronic sources – Take care to rigorously evaluate your sources, particularly
ones from the Internet. Ask who authored the information, who published or sponsored the
information, how well the information reflects the author’s knowledge of the field, and whether the
information is accurate and timely.
Excessive quoting – When quoting a source in order to provide evidence, use only the relevant
part of the quotation. When you establish a claim/assertion and provide textual support, be sure
to explain the relationship between the quotation and the assertion.
Wordiness – Be as concise as possible without omitting important content. Frequently, the task is
to summarize facts or compare data to a standard rather than to write endlessly about a situation.
Plagiarism – Plagiarism is the use of someone else’s work or ideas, in any form, without proper
acknowledgement. Whether you are quoting, summarize, or paraphrasing in your own words, you
must cite your sources, including online sources. Even if you do not intend to plagiarize, if you do
not properly cite your sources, you have plagiarized.
Passive voice – Use active voice as often as possible. Active voice generally is more concise and
lively than passive voice.