Determination of Feeding Stimulants in Shrimp Using A Solid Matrix Bioassay
Determination of Feeding Stimulants in Shrimp Using A Solid Matrix Bioassay
ABSTRACT : Chemoreception plays an important role in the processes of feeding, mating, and defense against predators.
Studies have identified amino acid complexes and marine-origin compounds as effective attractants that can be included in the
feed of farmed marine shrimp. Marine shrimp have developed mechanisms to compensate for their poor visual sense, by using
chemoreceptors located in both locomotion appendices and buccal parts, as effective tactile, gustatory and olfactory senses. A
nutritionally adequate and organoleptically pleasing diet is essential to achieve satisfactory intake and growth in shrimps.To
improve the palatability of diets, various substances have been investigated for their effectiveness in aqua-feed including natural
feed ingredients and synthetic flavor substances. Diet palatability and attractiveness would help to reduce the time that shrimp
spend approaching the feed and it would limit nutrient leaching and feed loss which in turn reduce deterioration of rearing
pondenvironments from overloaded nutrient input. A feeding bioassay system which uses agar discs was used for evaluating
chemosensory stimuli influencing ingestive behaviour in Fenneropenaeus indicus and in Metapenaeus dobsonii.Various
extract fractions were assayed to determine the tissue component that is responsible for eliciting ingestion activity in the
shrimps.
Key words : Chemoreception, feeding response, extract fractions, tissue components, Fenneropenaues indicus, Metapenaues
dobsoni, bioassay system, agar matrix bioassay, test stimuli, ingestion.
Table 2 : Agar gel consumption (g/100 g. body weight of shrimp) by Fenneropenaeus indicus in a two choice feeding preference test.
Stimulus concentration (% W/V)
Test stimulus 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
References
Shark 0.321 0.032 0.336 0.396 0.529 0.788
Mussel 0.035 0.233 0.438 0.521 0.645 0.817
Cuttle Fish 0.032 0.268 0.373 0.483 0.612 0.825
Squila 0.031 0.126 0.337 0.473 0.613 0.753
Fish 0.035 0.218 0.402 0.495 0.537 0.794
Crab 0.034 0.340 0.426 0.605 0.739 0.988
Shrimp 0.036 0.266 0.440 0.505 0.696 0.842
Black Clam 0.032 0.298 0.422 0.639 0.718 0.948
Squid 0.034 0.336 0.439 0.607 0.779 0.998
Earthworm 0.032 0.169 0.219 0.393 0.448 0.680
Mysid 0.033 0.149 0.313 0.424 0.565 0.603
White Clam 0.032 0.128 0.352 0.467 0.545 0.784
Seaweed 0.034 0.102 0.263 0.310 0.465 0.564
Oyster 0.036 0.274 0.418 0.593 0.712 0.883
Squid (with ink sac) 0.030 0.180 0.116 0.076 0.037 0.023
much higher reduction in agar consumption and higher When the agar gel was flavoured with free amino
loss in potency than the lipid free fraction. In F. indicus, acid fraction (FAA) alone, the potency came down to
minimum loss in potency was recorded for protein free 47.5 to 68.6% in F. indicus and 45.5 to 57.2% in M.
fraction of crab extract and maximum for the clam extract, dobsoni for various extract types. In both the species
whereas, in M. dobsoni it was for protein free fraction maximum consumption occurred when the gel was
of shrimp and squilla extracts respectively. flavoured with free amino acid fraction of crab, followed
262 Cheryl Antony et al
Table 3 : Agar gel consumption (g/100 g. body weight of shrimp) by Metapenaeus dobsoni in a two choice feeding preference test.
Stimulus concentration (% W/V)
Test stimulus 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
References
Shark 0.061 0.295 0.351 0.395 0.404 0.523
Mussel 0.059 0.269 0.418 0.533 0.667 0.734
Cuttle Fish 0.062 0.259 0.414 0.503 0.600 0.698
Squila 0.062 0.234 0.364 0.428 0.553 0.628
Fish 0.058 0.227 0.367 0.431 0.567 0.634
Black Clam 0.059 0.390 0.442 0.596 0.744 0.882
Oyster 0.064 0.314 0.437 0.534 0.683 0.786
Shrimp 0.061 0.382 0.492 0.603 0.783 0.886
Squid 0.063 0.483 0.534 0.687 0.723 0.899
Earthworm 0.062 0.218 0.310 0.346 0.436 0.505
Mysid 0.065 0.254 0.321 0.353 0.439 0.517
White Clam 0.065 0.296 0.316 0.413 0.529 0.593
Seaweed 0.065 0.263 0.308 0.352 0.416 0.511
Squid (with ink sac) 0.061 0.114 0.103 0.083 0.023 0.000
Table 4 : Ingestive potency of tissue extract fractions and synthetic fractions on Fenneropenaeus indicus and Metapenaeus dobsoni.
Extract source TE LFE PFE FAA SAA SN
a. F. indicus
Fish 1.0 0.950 0.807 0.506 0.273 0.215
Clam 1.0 0.877 0.705 0.529 0.316 0.127
Shrimp 1.0 0.927 0.848 0.455 0.319 0.156
Crab 1.0 0.987 0.923 0.572 0.390 0.174
Oyster 1.0 0.931 0.844 0.489 0.312 0.151
Squid 1.0 0.942 0.858 0.522 0.335 0.158
Mussel 1.0 0.958 0.734 0.508 0.320 0.166
Squilla 1.0 0.896 0.798 0.527 - -
b. M. dobsoni
Fish 1.0 0.923 0.920 0.580 0.495 0.192
Clam 1.0 0.917 0.834 0.559 0.386 0.217
Shrimp 1.0 0.981 0.903 0.520 0.421 0.261
Crab 1.0 0.973 0.874 0.566 0.434 0.247
Oyster 1.0 0.928 0.843 0.475 0.385 0.182
Squid 1.0 0.894 0.826 0.501 0.357 0.217
Mussel 1.0 0.964 0.863 0.526 0.349 0.168
Squilla 1.0 0.913 0.790 0.86 - -
by squid, clam and shrimp and minimum for FAA of fish differ significantly in their ability to induce ingestion
extract. Synthetic amino acid fraction (SAA) produced activity in shrimps (P<0.05). Species also differ
a potency of 34.9 to 49.5% in M. dobsoni and 27.3 to significantly in their specificity to different amino acids
39.0% in F. indicus. The SAA fraction based on the amino studied (P<0.05). Methionine produced maximum agar
acid profile of clam produced maximum agar consumption consumption and higher relative activity in F.indicus
and of fish the minimum consumption in both the species. followed by lysine, proline, arginine, aspartic acid, taurine,
The potency of synthetic amino acid fraction compared alanine and histidine in the order. Maximum relative
to the free amino acid fraction was low in both species activity was recorded for methionine (83.12%) in F.
and is of the order of 54% to 86% in F. indicus and 66 to indicus and minimum for tyrosine (11.32%). In M.
86% in M. dobsoni. dobsoniaspartic acid produced maximum agar
The stimulatory efficacy of different amino acids on consumption with a relative activity of 82.52% and
agar consumption is depicted in Table 5. Amino acids minimum by alanine (4.87%). The order of preference
Determination of feeding stimulants in shrimp using a solid matrix bioassay 263
Table 5 : Agar gel consumption (g/100 g body weight of shrimp) and the relative ingestive activity of the test samples (amino acids) for F.
indicus and M. dobsoni in a two choice feeding preference test.
F. indicus M. dobsoni
Stimuli
Agar Gel Relative Agar Gel Relative
Consumption (g) Activity Consumption(g) Activity
Amino acid
Synthetic Amino acid Fraction of Shrimp 0.751 100 0.698 100
Alanine 0.366 48.79 0.232 33.24
Arginine 0.449 59.79 0.242 34.67
Aspartic acid 0.418 55.66 0.597 82.52
Glutamic acid 0.327 43.54 0.422 60.46
Glycine 0.325 43.28 0.238 34.10
Histidine 0.339 45.14 0.240 34.38
Isoleucine 0.274 36.48 0.486 69.63
Leucine 0.242 32.20 0.514 73.64
Lysine 0.624 83.09 0.278 39.83
Methionine 0.629 83.12 0.538 77.08
Ornithine 0.209 27.83 0.181 25.93
Phenylalanine 0.239 31.82 0.207 29.60
Proline 0.484 64.45 0.305 43.70
Serine 0.242 32.22 0.218 31.23
Taurine 0.410 54.59 0.401 51.45
Threonine 0.241 32.09 0.271 38.83
Tryptophan 0.277 36.88 0.505 72.35
Tyrosine 0.085 11.32 0.175 25.07
Valine 0.181 24.10 0.034 4.87
of M. dobsoni towards amino acids was aspartic acid, stimuli and gives good indication of relative rank and
methionine, leucine, tryptophan, isoleucine, glutamic acid, general preference trends. For the tissue extracts tested
taurine and proline. Hence, it is observed that the order equal weights with F. indicus, the palatability ranking
of preferences in the amino acid fractions showed was Squid>Crab>Clam>Oyster>Shrimp extract and for
differences between the species. These results show that M. dobsoni it was Squid>Shrimp>Clam>Crab>Oyster
the observations can be utilized in the formulating of feeds extracts (Tables 2 and 3). Nakamura (1987) reported
based on the amino acid profiles in the ingredients.It is that specific amino acids elevate only orientation and
also observed that when the test stimulus squid extract searching behaviour in P. japonicus, but for ingestion
with ink was tested, there was a significant reduction in response, some proteins such as casein and gelatin as
the consumption when compared to the other ingredient well as saccharides, glucose and starch were more
sources. stimulative than amino acids. These present study
DISCUSSION indicated that free amino acids form the major flavour
component of tissue extracts eliciting ingestion activity
A feeding bioassay which uses agar discs was in bothspecies. Betaine was found to have limited role as
developed for evaluating chemosensory stimuli influencing an ingestant in F. indicus and M. dobsoni (Table 5).
ingestive behaviour in F. indicus and M. dobsoni. The Both of these components also produced very poor
palatability assay required only small amounts of stimuli response in behavioural evaluation indicating that they
and is suitable for rapid and inexpensive screening of a have no role in the feeding activity of this shrimps, when
wide variety of compounds. The added advantage of the tested alone. But several workers have reported that
system is that only quite small amounts of stimuli can be betaine acted is a stimulant in various aspects of feeding
used to test large number of individuals. Unlike feed tests behaviour in diverse crustaceans when tested alone
which incorporate stimuli into feed pellets, this assay is (Hodgson, 1958; Laverack, 1963; Hashimoto, 1967; Carr,
independent of confounding factors such as pellet size, 1978; Harpaz et al, 1987a, b; Harpaz, 1988). Betaine
texture, or hardness, and the results are not influenced HCl was found to be one of the most potent chemo-
by other compounds extent in the pellets. This test allows attractant for M. rosenbergii in behavioural observations
direct comparison of the relative efficacy of the paired (Harpaz et al, 1987 a, b) as well as in electro physiological
264 Cheryl Antony et al
studies (Derby and Harpaze, 1988) and in one of the Palaemonetespugio: comparative studies of stimulatory
major components in extracts of fish, crab and shrimp substances in human serum. Biol. Bull. 148, 380-392
which are readily fed upon by M. rosenbergii likewise Case J (1964a) Adequate stimulus of certain Cancer dactyl
chemoreceptors. Amer. Zool. 4, 37.
Hodgson (1988) and Laverack (1963) reported that
Case J (1964b) Properties of the dactyl chemoreceptors of Canceran
betaineis a feeding incitant in crayfish, crabs and lobsters.
tennarius and C. productus. Biol. Bull. 127, 428-446.
Arginine is one of the most potent amino acid inducing
Derby C D and Harpaz S (1988) Physiology of chemoreceptor cells
ingestion in F. indicus, but have only a less significant in the legs of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii.
role in inducing feeding response in P. japonicus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 90A, 85-91.
Similarly, glycine elicited feeding behaviour in both F. Harpaz S, Kahan D and Galum R (1987a) Variability in feeding
indicus and M. dobsoni, but had only poor ingestant behaviour of the Malaysian prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii
activity. But glycine was considered as the most potent (De Mann) during the moult cycle (Decapoda Caridea).
Crustaceana 52, 53-60.
stimulant for P. japonicus (Nakamura, 1987) and P.
Harpaz S, Kahan D, Galun R and Moore I (1987b) Responses of
monodon (Murai et al, 1981). In lobsters, Levandowsky
freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, to chemical
and Hodgson (1958) found glycine as less stimulative. attractants. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1957-1965.
Most of the workers reported taurine as the major extract Hollander M and Wolffe D A (1973) Nonparametric Statistical
component of prey organisms inducing feeding activities Methods Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics
in decapod crustaceans (Case, 1964; Ache, 1972; (eds. Bradley R A, Hunter J S, Kendall D G and Watson G S).
Mackie, 1973; Shepheard, 1974; Carr and Gurin, 1975; pp. 138-141.
Carr, 1976; 1978; Carr et al, Johson and Ache, 1978; Harpaz S and Steiner J E (1987) Quantitative analysis of feeding
Trott and Robertson, 1984). Taurine was also found as a behaviour stereotypes and the rejection of over satiating food in
the freshwater prawn. Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Taste and
potent feed ingestant for P. indicus and M. dobsoni in Olfaction. In the Annual Meeting of the New York Academy of
the present study, but had a very poor role in eliciting the Science, pp. 347-348.
initial feeding behaviours. Harpaz S and Steiner J E (1990) Analysis of the betaine induced
The most important factor determining the success feeding behaviour of the Malaysian prawn, Macrobrachium
rosenbergii (de Man, 1979) (Decapoda, Caridea). Crustaceana
of the feed manufacture is palatability and attractiveness 58, 175-185.
of the feed that promotesingestion leading to utilization
Holland K N and Borski R J (1993) A palatability bioassay for
of available nutrients. Diet palatability and attractiveness determining ingestive stimuli in the marine shrimp Penaeus
would help to reduce the time that shrimp spend vannamei. Aquacul. 109, 153-164.
approaching the feed and it would limit nutrient leaching Hashimoto Y, Konosu S, Fusentani U and Nose T (1968) Attractants
and feed loss, which in turn reduce deterioration of rearing for eel in the extracts of short necked clam. I. Survey of
pondenvironments from overloaded nutrient input. Feed constituents eliciting feeding behavior by the omission test. Ball.
Jap. Soc. Sc. Fish. 34, 78-83.
and feeding management, therefore, constitute an
Hodgson E S (1958) Electrophysiological studies of arthropod
immense element in the success of the shrimp culture
chemoreception III. Chemoreceptors of terrestrial and freshwater
production in terms of both growth promotion and cost. arthropods. Biol. Bull. 115, 114-125.
REFERENCES Johnson B R and Ache B W (1978) Antennular chemosensitivity in
Ache B W (1972) Amino acid receptors in the antennules of Homarus the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus: amino acids as feeding stimli.
americanus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 42A, 807-811. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 5, 145-157.
Laverack M S (1963) Aspects of chemoreception in crustacea. Comp.
Adams M A and Johnson P B (1986) A solid matrix bioassay for
Biochem. Physiol. 8, 141-151.
determining chemical feeding stimulants. Prog. Fish Cult. 48,
147-149. Levandowsky M and Hodgson E S (1965) Aminoacid and amine
receptors of lobsters. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 16, 159-161.
A O A C (1990) Official methods of Analysis edition. Association of
Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C. Mackie A M (1973) The chemical basis of food detection in the lobster
Homarus gammarus. Mar. Biol. 21, 103-108.
Carr W E S (1976) Chemoreception and feeding behaviour in the pig
Murai T, Sumalangkay A and Pascual F P (1981)Improvement of diet
fish Orthopristis chrysopterus : Characterization and
attractability for Penaeusmonodon by supplementing various
identification of stimulatory substances in a shrimp extract.
attractants. Quart. Res. Rep.Aquacul. Dept. of the SEAFDEC 5,
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 55(A), 153-157.
1-4.
Carr W E S (1978) Chemoreception in the shrimp Palaemonetes pugio:
Nakamura K (1987) Chemoreceptive property in feeding of the prawn
the role of amino acids and betaine in elicitation of a feeding
Penaeus japonicus.Mem. Fac. Fish. Kago. Univ. 36, 201-205
response by extracts. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 61A, 127-131.
Shepheard P (1974) Chemoreception in the antennule of the lobster,
Carr W E S, Ache B W and Gleeson R A (1987) Chemoreceptors of Homarus americanus. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 2, 261-273.
crustaceans: similarities to receptors for neuroactive substances
Trott T J and Robertson J R (1984) Chemical stimulants of cheliped
in internal tissues. Environ. Health Perspect. 71, 31-46.
flexioTI behaviour by the Western Atlantic ghost crab Rode
Carr W E S and Gurin S (1975) Chemoreception in the shrimp, quadrata (Fab.) J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 78, 237-252.