Plants have historically been grouped into kingdoms and taxonomic systems based on their characteristics. Early systems divided organisms into two kingdoms of plants and animals. Later systems incorporated single-celled organisms and proposed three or more kingdoms. The current system recognizes three domains of life - Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya - with plants classified under various kingdoms within the Eukarya domain such as Plantae. Systems of classification continue to be refined as new research emerges.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views
Plant Systematics
Plants have historically been grouped into kingdoms and taxonomic systems based on their characteristics. Early systems divided organisms into two kingdoms of plants and animals. Later systems incorporated single-celled organisms and proposed three or more kingdoms. The current system recognizes three domains of life - Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya - with plants classified under various kingdoms within the Eukarya domain such as Plantae. Systems of classification continue to be refined as new research emerges.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38
PLANTS AND KINGDOMS OF LIFE
Plants are man’s prime companions in this
universe, being the source of food and energy, shelter and clothing, drugs and beverages, oxygen and aesthetic environment, and as such they have been the dominant component of his taxonomic activity through the ages. Two Kingdom System • The living organisms were originally grouped into two kingdoms. • Aristotle divided all living things between plants, which generally do not move or have sensory organs, and animals. • Linnaeus in his Systema naturae published in 1735 placed them under Animalia (Animals) and Vegetabilia (Plants) • as two distinct kingdoms (Linnaeus placed minerals in the third kingdom Mineralia). • Linnaeus divided each kingdom into classes, later grouped into phyla for animals and divisions for plants. • When single-celled organisms were first discovered, they were split between the two kingdoms: mobile forms in the animal phylum Protozoa, and colored algae and bacteria in the plant division Thallophyta or Protophyta. • As a result, Ernst Haeckel (1866) suggested creating a third kingdom Protista for them, although this was not very popular until relatively recently (sometimes also known as Protoctista). • Haeckel recognized three kingdoms: Protista, Plantae and Animalia. Two Empires Three Kingdoms • The subsequent discovery that bacteria are radically different from other organisms in lacking a nucleus, led Chatton (1937) to propose a division of life into two empires: organisms with a nucleus in Eukaryota and organisms without in Prokaryota. • Prokaryotes do not have a nucleus, mitochondria or any other membrane bound organelles. • In other words neither their DNA nor any other of their metabolic functions are collected together in a discrete membrane enclosed area. • Eukaryotes have a separate membrane bound nucleus, numerous mitochondria and other organelles such as the Golgi Body within each of their cells. • These areas are separated off from the main mass of the cell’s cytoplasm by their own membrane in order to allow them to be more specialized. • The nucleus contains all the Eukaryote cell DNA, which gets organized into distinct chromosomes during the process of mitosis and meiosis. • The energy is generated in mitochondria. • The exception to this rule are red blood cells which have no nucleus and do not live very long. • Chatton’s proposal, however, was not taken up immediately, because another classification was proposed by Herbert Copeland (1938), who gave the prokaryotes a separate kingdom, originally called Mycota but later referred to as Monera or Bacteria. • Copeland later on (1956) proposed a four- kingdom system placing all eukaryotes other than animals and plants in the kingdom Protoctista, thus recognizing four kingdoms Monera, Protoctista, Plantae and Animalia. • The importance of grouping these kingdoms in two empires, as suggested earlier by Chatton was popularized by Stanier and van Niel (1962), and soon became widely accepted. Five Kingdom System • American biologist Robert H. Whittaker (1969) proposed the removal of fungi into a separate kingdom thus establishing a five kingdom system recognizing Monera, Protista, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia as distinct kingdoms. • The fungi like plants have a distinct cell wall but like animals lack autotrophic mode of nutrition. They, however, unlike animals draw nutrition from decomposition of organic matter, have cell wall reinforced with chitin, cell membranes containing ergosterol instead of cholesterol and have a unique biosynthetic pathway for lysine. • The classification was followed widely in textbooks. Six or Seven Kingdoms? • Subsequent research concerning the organisms previously known as archebacteria has led to the recognition that these creatures form an entirely distinct kingdom Archaea. • These include anaerobic bacteria found in harsh oxygen-free conditions and are genetically and metabolically completely different from other, oxygen- breathing organisms. • These bacteria, called Archaebacteria, or simply Archaea, are said to be “living fossils” that have survived since the planet’s very early ages, before the Earth’s atmosphere even had free oxygen. • This together with the emphasis on phylogeny requiring groups to be monophyletic resulted in a six kingdom system proposed by Carl Woese et al. (1977). • They grouped Archaebacteria and Eubacteria under Prokaryotes and rest of the four kingdoms Protista, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia under Eukaryotes. • They subsequently (1990) grouped these kingdoms into three domains Bacteria (containing Eubacteria), Archaea (containing Archaebacteria) and Eukarya (containing Protista, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia). • Margulis and Schwartz (1998) proposed term superkingdom for domains and recognized two superkingdoms: Prokarya (Prokaryotae) and Eukarya (Eukaryotae). • Former included single kingdom Bacteria (Monera) divided into two subkingdoms Archaea and Eubacteria. • Eukarya was divided into four kingdoms: Protoctista (Protista), Animalia, Plantae and Fungi. • Several recent authors have attempted to recognize seventh kingdom of living organisms, but they differ in their treatment. Ross • (2002, 2005) recognized Archaebacteria and Eubacteria as separate kingdoms, named as Protomonera and Monera, respectively again under separate superkingdoms (domains of earlier authors) Archaebacteriae and Eubacteria. • He added seventh kingdom Myxomycophyta of slime moulds under superkingdom Eukaryotes. • Two additional superkingdoms of extinct organisms Progenotes (first cells) and Urkaryotes (prokaryotic cells that became eukaryotes) were added: • Superkingdom Progenotes.... • ....first cells now extinct • Superkingdom Archaebacteriae – Kingdom Protomonera...archaic bacteria • Superkingdom Eubacteria – Kingdom Monera........bacteria • Superkingdom Urkaryotes ...prokaryoti cells that became eukaryotes Seven kingdoms of life and their possible phylogeny (after Patterson & Sogin 1992). • Superkingdom Eukaryotes • ...cells with nuclei • Kingdom Protista..........protozoans • Kingdom Myxomycophyta...slime molds • Kingdom Plantae............plants • Kingdom Fungi..............fungi • Kingdom Animalia...........animals • Patterson & Sogin (1992; Figure 1.1) recognized seven kingdoms, but included slime moulds under Protozoa (Protista) and instead established Chromista (diatoms) as seventh kingdom. • Interestingly the traditional algae now find themselves distributed in three different kingdoms: eubacterial prokaryotes (the blue- green cyanobacteria), chromistans (diatoms, kelps), and protozoans (green algae, red algae, dinoflagellates, euglenids). Cavalier-Smith (1981) suggested that Eukaryotes can be classified into nine kingdoms each defined in terms of a unique constellation of cell structures. Five kingdoms have plate-like mitochondrial cristae: (1) Eufungi (the non-ciliated fungi, which unlike the other eight kingdoms have unstacked Golgi cisternae), (2) Ciliofungi (the posteriorly ciliated fungi), (3) Animalia (Animals, sponges, mesozoa, and choanociliates; phagotrophs with basically posterior ciliation), (4) Biliphyta (Non-phagotrophic, phycobilisomecontaining, algae; i.e. the Glaucophyceae and Rhodophyceae), (5) Viridiplantae (Nonphagotrophic green plants, with starch- containing plastids). (6) Euglenozoa, has disc-shaped cristae and an intraciliary dense rod and may be phagotrophic and/or phototrophic with plastids with three-membraned envelopes. Kingdom (7) Cryptophyta, has flattened tubular cristae, tubular mastigonemes on both cilia, and starch in the compartment between the plastid endoplasmic reticulum and the plastid envelope; their plastids, if present, have phycobilins inside the paired thylakoids and chlorophyll c2. • Kingdom (8), the Chromophyta, has tubular cristae, together with tubular mastigonemes on one anterior cilium and/or a plastid endoplasmic reticulum and chlorophyll c1 + c2. • Members of the ninth kingdom,the Protozoa, are mainly phagotrophic, and have tubular or vesicular cristae (or lack mitochondria altogether), and lack tubular mastigonemes on their (primitively anterior) cilia; plastids if present have three-envelop membranes, chlorophyll c2, and no internal starch, and a plastid endoplasmic reticulum is absent. • Kingdoms 4-9 are primitively anteriorly biciliate. • A simpler system of five kingdoms suitable for very elementary teaching is possible by grouping the photosynthetic and fungal kingdoms in pairs. • It was suggested that Various compromises are possible between the nine and five kingdoms systems; • it is suggested that the best one for general scientific use is a system of seven kingdoms in which the Eufungi and Ciliofungi become subkingdoms of the Kingdom Fungi, and the Cryptophyta and Chromophyta subkingdoms of the Kingdom Chromista; • the Fungi, Viridiplantae, Biliphyta, and Chromista can be subject to the Botanical Code of Nomenclature, while the Zoological Code can govern the Kingdoms Animalia, Protozoa and Euglenozoa. • These 9 kingdoms together with two or one kingdom of prokaryotes total eleven or ten kingdoms of life. • Subsequently, however, Cavalier-Smith (1998, 2000, 2004) reverted back to six kingdom classification recognizing Bacteria, Protozoa, Animalia, Fungi, Plantae and Chromista under two empires Prokaryota and Eukaryota. • Prokaryotes constitute a single kingdom, Bacteria, here divided into two new subkingdoms: – Negibacteria, with a cell envelope of two distinct genetic membranes, and – Unibacteria, comprising the phyla Archaebacteria and Posibacteria. Outline of the classification is as under: Empire Prokaryota Kingdom Bacteria • Subkingdom Negibacteria (phyla – Eobacteria, Sphingobacteria, – Spirochaetae, Proteobacteria, – Planctobacteria, Cyanobacteria) • Subkingdom Unibacteria (phyla – Posibacteria, Archaebacteria) Empire Eukaryota Kingdom Protozoa – Subkingdom Sarcomastigota (phyla Amoebozoa, Choanozoa) – Subkingdom Biciliata • Kingdom Animalia (Myxozoa and 21 other phyla) • Kingdom Fungi (phyla Archemycota, Microsporidia, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota) • Kingdom Plantae – Subkingdom Biliphyta (phyla Glaucophyta, Rhodophyta) – Subkingdom Viridaeplantae (phyla Chlorophyta, Bryophyta, Tracheophyta) • Kingdom Chromista – Subkingdom Cryptista (phylum Cryptista: cryptophytes, goniomonads, katablepharids) – Subkingdom Chromobiota • The name archaebacteria seems to be confusing. • They were so named because they were thought to be the most ancient (Greek ‘archaio’ meaning ancient) and sometimes labelled as living fossils, since they can survive in anaerobic conditions (methanogens which use hydrogen gas to reduce carbon dioxide to methane gas), high temperatures (thermophiles, which can survive in temperatures of up to 80 degree C), or salty places (halophiles). • They differ from bacteria in having methionine as aminoacid that initiates protein synthesis as against formyl-methionine in bacteria, presence of introns in some genes, having several different RNA polymerases as against one in bacteria, absence of peptidoglycan in cell wall, and growth not inhibited by antibiotics like streptomycin and chloramphenicol. • In several of these respects archaebacteria are more similar to eukaryotes. • Bacteria are thought to have diverged early from the evolutionary line (the clade neomura, with many common characters, notably obligately co-translational secretion of N-linked glycoproteins, signal recognition particle with 7S RNA and translation-arrest domain, protein-spliced tRNA introns, eightsubunit chaperonin, prefoldin, core histones, small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs), exosomes and similar replication, repair, transcription and translation machinery) that gave rise to archaebacteria and eukaryotes. • It is, as such more appropriate to call archaebacteria as metabacteria. The further shift from archaebacteria to Eukaryotes involved the transformation of circular DNA into a linear DNA bound with histones, formation of membrane bound nucleus enclosing chromosomes, development of mitosis, occurrence of meiosis in sexually reproducing organisms, appearance of membrane bound organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum, golgi bodies and lysosomes, appearance of cytoskeletal elements like actin, myosin and tubulin, and the formation of mitochondria through endosymbiosis. • A major shift in this eukaryotic line which excluded animal and fungi, involved the development of chloroplast by an eukaryotic cell engulfing a photosynthetic bacterial cell (probably a cyanobacterium). • The bacterial cell continued to live and multiply inside the eukaryotic cell, provided high energy products, and in turn received a suitable environment to live in. • The two thus shared endosymbiosis. Over a period of time the bacterial cell lost ability to live independently, some of the bacterial genes getting transferred to eukaryotic host cell, making the two biochemically interdependent. • Chloroplast evolution in Euglenoids and Dinoflagellates occurred through secondary endosymbiosis, wherein eukaryotic cell engulfed an eukaryotic cell containing a chloroplast. The Plant Kingdom It is now universally agreed that members of the plant kingdom include, without doubt the green algae, liverworts and mosses, pteri-dophytes, gymnosperms and finally the angiosperms, the largest group of plants. All these plants share a green chloroplast. Red algae, Brown algae and Glaucophytes, latter two together known as stramenophiles, also belong to this kingdom. All these groups share the presence of a chloroplast. All green plants share a green chloroplast with chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a, thylakoids and grana, and starch as storage food. Evolution of cuticle combined with gametangia and embryo characterizes embryophytes, including bryophytes, pteridophytes and seed plants. The development of vascular tissue of phloem and xylem, and independent sporophyte characterize tracheophytes including pteridophytes and seed plants. Secondary growth resulting in the formation of wood and seed habit differentiates seed plants. The final evolution of a distinct flower, carpels and stamens, together with vessels and sieve tubes set apart the angiosperms, the most highly evolved group of plants. The species of living organisms on this planet include Monera-10,000; Protista-250,000; Fungi-100,000; Plantae-279,000; Animalia-1,130,000. Nearly three fourth of animals are insects (800,0000) and of these more than one third beetles (300,000). Amongst plants nearly 15,000 species belong to usually overlooked mosses and liverworts, 10,000 ferns and their allies, 820 to gymnosperms and 253,000 to angiosperms (belonging to about 485 families and 13,372 genera), considered to be the most recent and vigorous group of plants that have occurred on earth. Angiosperms occupy the majority of the terrestrial space on earth, and are the major components of the world’s vegetation. • Brazil and Colombia, both located in the tropics, are considered to be countries with the most diverse angiosperms floras and which rank first and second. • China, even though the main part of her land is not located in the tropics, the number of her angiosperms still occupies the third place in the world, and has approximately 300 families, 3, 100 genera and 30,000 species.