0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views

This Work Is Licensed Under The Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Singapore License

This document describes an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) software tool for evaluating multiple criteria. It allows input from up to 20 participants. The tool calculates the principal eigenvector and eigenvalue to determine the weights of each criterion. It measures the consistency of responses using the consistency ratio and provides an estimate of errors. The author is Klaus D. Goepel and the software is available freely at http://bpmsg.com.

Uploaded by

Junior Berrocal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views

This Work Is Licensed Under The Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Singapore License

This document describes an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) software tool for evaluating multiple criteria. It allows input from up to 20 participants. The tool calculates the principal eigenvector and eigenvalue to determine the weights of each criterion. It measures the consistency of responses using the consistency ratio and provides an estimate of errors. The author is Klaus D. Goepel and the software is available freely at http://bpmsg.com.

Uploaded by

Junior Berrocal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

http://bpmsg.

com

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial


3.0 Singapore License.
(You need to give credit to the author)
To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/sg/
or send a letter to Creative Commons,
171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Author: Klaus D. Goepel


http://bpmsg.com
Revisions
Date Comment
3/5/2012 1st draft based on AHPcalc vers 27.8.11 (single input);
allows input from max. 7 participants

11.12.2012 Algorithm of Power Method to solve Eigenvalue was modified


released (new sheet 8x8) resulting in much higher accuracy. By
default 12 iterations
08.02.2013
released final tests
2/19/2013 corrected formatting problem of weights in summary sheet
5/7/2013 Introduced weights for individual participants (weighted
geometric mean) in sheet multInp
Extend to 20 participants
12/24/2013 For the 3 most inconsistent judgments the ideal judgment
resulting in lowest inconsistency is displayed
5/9/2014 Change of check for convergence of power method
7/26/2014 corrected wrong ref in multInp (Matrix13)
4/9/2015 changed name of consol. Matrix from MatrixC to m_p0
CHOOSE in Summary sheet now p_sel+1 and m_p0 included
(IF cond removed)
changed the min of 3 to 2 criteria
6/7/2015 correction for 2 criteria: sheet 10x10 Cell M41 limit to 12
CGI in summary sheet to "n/a" for n=2, text (2 - 10)
5/4/2016 Corrected display of the selected scale in the summary sheet

5/4/2017 Corrected AHP consensus indicator (H gamma max)


8/22/2018 Balanced scale replaced by generalized balanced scale
(Balanced-n), Added adaptive scale.
Power method max no of iterations increased from 12 to 20.
9/15/2018 Inconsistency matrix pi/pj limited between 1/9 and 9
Error estimate for EV
Error estimate for RGGM, Ordinal inconsistency Psi
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)


K. D. Goepel Version 15.09.2018 Free web based AHP software on: http://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!

n= 5 Number of criteria (2 to 10) Scale: 1 AHP 1-9

N= 1 Number of Participants (1 to 20) a: 0.1 Consensus: n/a


3 9
p= 0 selected Participant (0=consol.) 2 7 #REF!
Objective RIESGO

Author JUNIOR
Date R DE Thresh: 1E-08 Iterations: #N/A EVM check: #N/A
AGOSTO
Table Criterio
Extremadamente Comment PESO +/-
1 Lluvioso Mayor a #REF! #REF!
2 P99
Muy Lluvioso Entr #REF! #REF!
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 #REF! #REF!
4 Moderadamente Llu #REF! #REF!
5 Ligeramente Lluvi #REF! #REF!
6 #REF! 0.0%
7 #REF! 0.0%
8 #REF! 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the #REF! 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) #REF! 0.0%

Resultado Valor Propio Lambda: #REF! MRE: #REF!


Relac. de Consistencia < 0.1 GCI: #REF! Psi: #REF! RC: #REF! MRE est #REF!
e Lluvioso Entre
Extremadament

Lluvioso Menor
Moderadament
Lluvioso Entre
Muy Lluvioso
Mayor a P99

Ligeramente
Entre P95 a

P90 a P95

P75 a P90
e Lluvioso

Matrix normalized
principal
a P75
P99

Eigenvector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Extremadam
ente Lluvioso 1 1 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
Mayor
Muy a P99
Lluvioso
Entre P95 a 2 #REF! 1 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
P99
Lluvioso
Entre P90 a 3 #REF! #REF! 1 #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
Moderadame P95
nte Lluvioso
Entre P75 a
4 #REF! #REF! #REF! 1 #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
Ligeramente
P90
Lluvioso 5 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 1 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
Menor a P75
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 #REF!

7
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 #REF!

8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 #REF!

9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 #REF!

10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 #REF!

by K. Goepel 442899121.xlsx-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 1


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM +/-


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 47.4% 5.5%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 24.4% 3.1%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 14.8% 1.7%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 8.1% 1.3%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 5.2% 0.9%
6 0.0% 0.0%
7 0.0% 0.0%
8 0.0% 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0% 0.0%

Participant 1 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00 ###
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00 ###
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00 ###
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso
15 1 5 A 8 ### #VALUE! 8.00 ###
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00 ###
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00 ###
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso
25 2 5 A 4 ### #VALUE! 4.00 ###
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00 ###
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso
35 3 5 A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00 ###
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00 ###
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 10
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 2


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 2 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 3


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 3 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 4


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 4 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 5


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 5 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In5
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 6


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 6 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In6
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 7


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 7 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1.00


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In7
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 8


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 8 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In8
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 9


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 9 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In9
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 10


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 10 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In10
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 11


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 11 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In11
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 12


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 12 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In12
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 13


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 13 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In13
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 14


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 14 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In14
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 15


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 15 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In15
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 16


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 16 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In16
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 17


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 17 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In17
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 18


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 18 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In18
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 19


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 20.0%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 20.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 20.0%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 20.0%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 20.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 19 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
15 1 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
25 2 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a ### #VALUE! 1.00
35 3 5
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En ### #VALUE! 1.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In19
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 5 Input 20


Objective: RIESGO
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM


1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M 42.7%
2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a P 26.0%
3 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 15.8%
4 Moderadamente Lluvioso En 9.6%
5 Ligeramente Lluvioso Menor 5.9%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 20 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1


Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Muy Lluvioso Entre
12 1 Extremadamente Lluvioso M
2 A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00
P95 a P99
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
13 1 3 Moderadamente A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
P95
14 1 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a A 4 ### #VALUE! 4.00
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso
15 1 5 A 6 ### #VALUE! 6.00
Menor a P75
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Lluvioso Entre P90 a
23 2 Muy Lluvioso Entre P95 a Moderadamente
3 A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00
P95
24 2 4 Lluvioso Entre P75 a A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso
25 2 5 A 4 ### #VALUE! 4.00
Menor a P75
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Moderadamente ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Lluvioso Entre P90 a P95 Lluvioso Entre P75 a A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00
Ligeramente
P90 Lluvioso
35 3 5 A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
Menor a P75
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Ligeramente Lluvioso
45 4 5 Moderadamente Lluvioso En A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00
Menor a P75
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 10
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

442899121.xlsx-In20
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/20/2019
Multiple Input Sheet
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet

1 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 5 = n number of criteria

C Consolidated 1 #REF! ### #REF!


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 8 0 0 0 0 0
2 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 2 1/2 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0
3 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 3 1/3 1/2 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0
4 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 4 1/7 1/3 1/2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
5 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 5 1/8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 #REF! ### #REF! 3 #REF! ### #REF!


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

4 #REF! ### #REF! 5 #REF! ### #REF!


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 #REF! ### #REF! 7 #REF! ### #REF!


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

8 #REF! ### #REF! 9 #REF! ### #REF!


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

10 #REF! ### #REF! 11 #REF! ### #REF!


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

23 of 24 442899121.xlsx-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix)
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
1 1.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
2 #REF! 1.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
3 #REF! #REF! 1.00 #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
4 #REF! #REF! #REF! 1.00 #REF! - - - - - #REF!
5 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 1.00 - - - - - #REF!
6 - - - - - 1.00 - - - - #REF!
7 - - - - - - 1.00 - - - #REF!
8 - - - - - - - 1.00 - - #REF!
9 - - - - - - - - 1.00 - #REF!
10 - - - - - - - - - 1.00 #REF!
Sum (col) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF! #REF!


#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - #REF!
#REF!
Check #N/A err: #REF!
#REF! Iterations: #REF!
#REF! check: #REF!
#REF! #REF!
I*I #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - -


#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - Convergence
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - -
1E-02
A-I*I #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - -
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - 1E-04
- - - - - #REF! - - - - 1E-06
- - - - - - #REF! - - -
- - - - - - - #REF! - - 1E-08
- - - - - - - - #REF! - 1E-10
- - - - - - - - - #REF!
1E-12
(A-I*I)x #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 1E-14
1E-16
12

Iterations

You might also like