A. Conclusion
A. Conclusion
A. Conclusion
The classroom action research had been conducted in one cycles that
consisted three meetings. In each meetings, while conducting the research, there
were four stages: Planning, action, observing, and reflection. The English teacher
acted as collaborator who observed and kept monitoring the process of the
research, while the researcher applied the technique in the classroom based on the
planning which had been designed by the researcher and the teacher. During
checklist.
[dӡ] palate-alveolar affricative and sound [ð] dental fricative, the researcher tried
to solve the problem by a technique which was believed had power solve the
Based on the observation checklist and field notes, the activities did not
run smoothly. The collaborator found some weakness in this cycle related to the
first meeting, the students on confused about the procedure of the technique, most
of the students were still shy and not comfortable learn about pronunciation. From
the interview with the students, they used to learn English in usual way without
pay attention on the right pronunciation, the teacher should invite several times
cannot use the target language in the learning process even students do not use
was due their lack of listening to an example. When the teacher gives an example
too, students do not pay attention because for them examples from teacher are not
interesting. In this meeting, most of students still find out difficult to use target
language, only some of students who are confident to speak with the target
language even though the grammar was still less correct, many of students cannot
pronounce the sound [ð] correctly almost all of students still substituted sound [ð]
in to[t] and [d] only some students who can pronounce it sound correctly. As the
result, the activity was not accomplished well. The students still worried about
their pronunciation, nervous and not confident. The students also still became
passive learners; only some of them took part actively in the activities. Besides
that the students’ mean score. The goal learning achieve as expected by the
researcher.
students have been more active, the atmosphere in the classroom is also
conductive, the teacher say what the words then followed by the students, in
addition the teacher also provides some video about the pronunciation, video as a
props that the researcher in this study, the students have to reading aloud all of the
test was given by teacher, in addition the teacher should demonstrate how to
produce the right sound. To create a environment of a best communication that
help the students to engaged one particular activity is doing that thing target
language and also improve is value, quality and attractiveness. Direct method is
researcher acted as motivator and facilitator. The students knew what to do, they
In third meeting, the students were very enthusiastic in learning. All the
students got involve actively in pronouncing the word correctly. They did not felt
worried about their pronunciation, more confidents when they read aloud and
pronounce the word correctly. The students were very exciting in learning by
from the first meeting to next meeting. In the first meeting, the mean score
students’ 31.33, in the second meeting was 33.33, in the last meeting was 66.66.
1
Nadia Batol et.al, “The Direct Method: A Good Start to Teach Oral Language”, Journal
of Literature, Language and Linguistic, ISSN 2422-8435, (An International Peer-Reviewed
Journal Vol. 5, 2005),p. 54.
B. Suggestion
the students which can make them more relax and enjoy getting material and also
2. The achieve the goal of teaching, the teacher may adapt between
material strategy that teacher apply in the classroom, the teacher could explore
and developed the usage of direct method to the teaching English in other
use direct method to improve their pronunciation skill, and then the students