Scribd
Upload
63 views1 page

(5-Excellent 4-Very Satisfactory 3-Satisfactory: Group 5

Group 5 provided an evaluation of Lecturer Group 3. They rated the lecturer on 9 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent and 1 being poor. These criteria included how substantial the course content was, how knowledgeable the lecturer was, how clear the presentations and examples were, how well the topic was explained, how well the class was managed, how much time was allotted per topic, if expected results were met, and how well organized the lecture/training was. The group provided total scores for each lecturer and space for additional comments and suggestions.

Uploaded by

Pau Dela Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
63 views1 page

(5-Excellent 4-Very Satisfactory 3-Satisfactory: Group 5

Group 5 provided an evaluation of Lecturer Group 3. They rated the lecturer on 9 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent and 1 being poor. These criteria included how substantial the course content was, how knowledgeable the lecturer was, how clear the presentations and examples were, how well the topic was explained, how well the class was managed, how much time was allotted per topic, if expected results were met, and how well organized the lecture/training was. The group provided total scores for each lecturer and space for additional comments and suggestions.

Uploaded by

Pau Dela Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

GROUP 5

EVALUATION FORM
LECTURER: GROUP 3
NAME OF EVALUATOR: ___________________________________________
(5- EXCELLENT 4-VERY SATISFACTORY 3-SATISFACTORY 2-FAIR 1-POOR)
DIONISIO, CASILISILIHAN, GELSANA, REYES, ROGEL VALDEZ,
KELLY JOHN HARVEY JOHN CARLO MICHAEL PAUL

1. Course content was substantial/complete


2. Resource Speaker/Lecturer was knowledgeable of the topic
3. Presentations were clear and easy to understand
4. Examples given were sufficient
5. Resource speaker/lecturer explained the topic well
6. Class were properly managed
7. Enough time was allotted per topic
8. Expected results were met
9. The lecture/training was well organized
TOTAL
10. Comments/suggestions for improvement/appreciations
GROUP 5
EVALUATION FORM
LECTURER: GROUP 3
NAME OF EVALUATOR: ___________________________________________
(5- EXCELLENT 4-VERY SATISFACTORY 3-SATISFACTORY 2-FAIR 1-POOR)
DIONISIO, CASILISILIHAN, GELSANA, REYES, ROGEL VALDEZ,
KELLY JOHN HARVEY JOHN CARLO MICHAEL PAUL

11. Course content was substantial/complete


12. Resource Speaker/Lecturer was knowledgeable of the topic
13. Presentations were clear and easy to understand
14. Examples given were sufficient
15. Resource speaker/lecturer explained the topic well
16. Class were properly managed
17. Enough time was allotted per topic
18. Expected results were met
19. The lecture/training was well organized
TOTAL
20. Comments/suggestions for improvement/appreciations

You might also like