Dimension Analysis
Dimension Analysis
2
Introducton
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
22
The mathematcal
It is wise to choose common The groups that result from the
rules for adding and
parameters as repeatng method of repeatng variables are
subtractng
parameters since they may guaranteed to be dimensionless
exponents during
appear in each of your because we force the overall
multplicaton and
dimensionless groups. exponent of all seven primary
division,
respectvely. dimensions to be zero.
23
nstablished
nondimensional
parameters are usually
named after a notable
scientst or engineer. 24
Step 6
A quick check of
your algebra is
always wise. 25
nx.4
26
If the method of
repeatng variables
indicates zero ’s,
we have either
made an error, or
we need to reduce j
by one and start
over.
27
28
29
DIMnNSIONAL ANALYSIS AND SIMILARITY
30
The three primary purposes of dimensional analysis are
34
The Reynolds number Re is formed by the
rato of density, characteristc speed, and
characteristc length to viscosity.
45
A parameter that is dimensionless
(like an angle) is already a
nondimensional all by itself—
we know this without doing any
further algebra.
46
47
In nxamples 7–5 and 7–6 the air speed of the prototype car is 50.0 mi/h, and that of the wind
tunnel is 224 mi/h. At 25°C, this corresponds to a prototype Mach number of Ma p = 0.065, and at
5°C, the Mach number of the wind tunnel is 0.29—on the borderline of the incompressible limit.
In hindsight, we should have included the speed of sound in our dimensional analysis, which
would have generated the Mach number as an additonal . Another way to match the Reynolds
number while keeping the Mach number low is to use a liquid such as water, since liquids are
nearly incompressible, even at fairly high speeds. 48
49
50
Although the Darcy fricton
factor for pipe fows is most
common, you should be aware
of an alternatve, less common
fricton factor called the
Fanning fricton factor. The
relatonship between the two is
f = 4Cf . 51
52
7–5 ■ nXPnRIMnNTAL TnSTING, MODnLING,
AND INCOMPLnTn SIMILARITY
One if the mist useful applicatiins if dimensiinal analysis is in designing physical
and/ir numerical experiments, and in repirting the results if such experiments.
In this secton we discuss both of these applicatons, and point out situatons in which
complete dynamic similarity is not achievable.
Consider a problem in which there are fve original parameters (one of which is the
dependent parameter).
A complete set of experiments (called a full factorial test matrix) is conducted.
This testng would require 54 = 625 experiments.
Assuming that three primary dimensions are represented in the problem, we can reduce
the number of parameters from fve to two (k = 5 3 = 2 nondimensional groups), and
the number of independent parameters from four to one.
Thus, for the same resoluton we would then need to conduct a total of only 5 1 = 5
experiments.
53
For a two- problem, we plot
dependent dimensionless parameter (1)
as a functon of independent dimensionless
parameter (2). The resultng plot can be
(a) linear or (b) nonlinear. In either case,
regression and curve-ftng techniques are
available to determine the relatonship
between the ’s.
54
Incomplete Similarity
Several examples were shown in which the non-dimensional groups are easily
obtained with paper and pencil through straightorward use of the methid if
repeating variables.
In fact, after sufcient practce, you should be able to obtain the ’s with ease—
sometmes in your head or on the “back of an envelope.”
Unfortunately, it is often a much diferent story when we go to apply the results
of our dimensional analysis to experimental data.
The problem is that it is not always possible to match all the ’s of a model to
the corresponding ’s of the prototype, even if we are careful to achieve geometric
similarity.
This situaton is called incomplete similarity.
Fortunately, in some cases of incomplete similarity, we are stll able to extrapolate
model test data to obtain reasonable full-scale predictons.
55
Wind Tunnel Testng
We illustrate incomplete similarity with the
problem of measuring the aerodynamic drag
force on a model truck in a wind tunnel.
One-sixteenth scale.
The model is geometrically similar to the
prototype.
The model truck is 0.991 m long. Wind
tunnel has a maximum speed of 70 m/s.
The wind tunnel test secton is 1.0 m tall and
1.2 m wide.
56
To match the Reynolds number between model and prototype, the wind
tunnel should be run at 429 m/s. This is impossible in this wind tunnel.
What do we do? There are several optons:
(1) Use a bigger wind tunnel. Automobile manufacturers typically test with
three-eighths scale model cars and with one-eighth scale model trucks and
buses in very large wind tunnels.
(2) We could use a diferent fuid for the model tests. For example, water can
achieve higher Re numbers, but more expensive.
(3) We could pressurize the wind tunnel and/or adjust the air temperature to
increase the maximum Reynolds number capability.
(4) If all else fails, we could run the wind tunnel at several speeds near the
maximum speed, and then extrapolate our results to the full-scale Reynolds
number.
Fortunately, it turns out that for many wind tunnel tests the last opton is
quite viable.
57
The Langley full-scale
wind tunnel (LFST) is
large enough that full-
scale vehicles can be
tested.
59
In many fows involving a liquid
with a free surface, both the
Reynolds number and Froude
number are relevant
nondimensional parameters. Since
it is not always possible to match
both Re and Fr between model and
prototype, we are sometmes
forced to setle for incomplete
similarity.
(b) 61
M
63