(23000929 - Autex Research Journal) Comparison of Mechanical and Thermal Comfort Properties of Tencel Blended With Regenerated Fibers and Cotton Woven Fabrics
(23000929 - Autex Research Journal) Comparison of Mechanical and Thermal Comfort Properties of Tencel Blended With Regenerated Fibers and Cotton Woven Fabrics
1515/aut-2018-0035 © AUTEX
Abdul Basit1, Wasif Latif1, Munir Ashraf2, Abdur Rehman2, Kashif Iqbal2*,
Hafiz Shahzad Maqsood1, Abdul Jabbar1, Sajjad Ahmad Baig3
1
Department of Yarn Manufacturing, National Textile University, 37610, Faisalabad, Pakistan
2
Department of Textile Processing, National Textile University, 37610, Faisalabad, Pakistan
3
Department of Business Administration, National Textile University, 37610, Faisalabad, Pakistan
*Corresponding e-mail address: [email protected]
Abstract:
The demand of cotton is increasing but its low production rate cannot fulfill the world requirements. The increase in
cotton demand has augmented the production of regenerated cellulosic fibers. Furthermore, cotton has proved to
be unsustainable because of the use of huge amount of fresh water, pesticides and insecticides. The purpose of this
work is to find out the suitable blend/blends of regenerated fibers so as to replace 100% cotton fabrics. Therefore,
mechanical and comfort properties of Tencel fabrics blended with other regenerated cellulose fibers have been
compared with 100% cotton to achieve the equivalent or even better end properties. Hence, cotton, viscose, Tencel,
modal, and bamboo fibers were taken. Plain woven blended fabrics of 100% cotton and 50:50 blends of Tencel
with other regenerated fibers were prepared from normal yarn count of 20 tex. The mechanical properties (warp-
wise and weft-wise tensile and tear strengths, pilling, and abrasion resistance) and the comfort properties including
air permeability, moisture management properties, and thermal resistance were evaluated. It is found that Tencel
blended fabrics show better results than 100% cotton fabrics. Therefore, it is concluded that Tencel blended with
these regenerated fabrics can be used to replace 100% cotton fabrics.
Keywords:
http://www.autexrj.com 80
has better mechanical properties [7]. Similarly, it was found that spinning by blending the fibers in Blow room. The machines
pure Tencel yarns and its blends have better quality than other used in this study are listed in Table 3.
blends [8]. Tencel gives excellent properties in both pure as well
as blended form and can be used in sports wear [9]. In a study of Table 2. Blend ratios
thermal comfort properties of bamboo and Tencel knitted fabrics,
it was found that increase in blend ratio of Tencel increases Yarns Ratio
air permeability, water vapor permeability, and increases
Cotton 100
thermal resistance [10]. Comparative analysis of thermal
insulation properties of fabrics made of cotton and Tencel was Tencel:modal 50:50
conducted. The finished Tencel fabrics showed lower values of
Tencel:viscose 50:50
thermal conductivity and thermal absorption than cotton fabrics
and higher values of thermal diffusion and resistance. [11]. Tencel:bamboo 50:50
Dimensional properties of viscose, modal, and lyocell single Table 3. Machinery for Yarn manufacturing
jersey knitted fabrics were studied with three different loop
lengths in dry, wet and relaxed conditions. The lyocell fabrics S. No. Machine Make
showed higher bursting strength and lower spirality than modal 01 Blow room Rieter, Truzschler
and viscose fabrics due to the structure of lyocell fibers [12]. 02 Card MK-5 Crosrol
03 Drawing frame DX8, RSB D 30
The current research has been focused on the use of Tencel 04 Comber Toyoda VC-5A
fibers along with other cellulosic blends (50:50) to replace 05 Simplex Toyota FL-16
100% cotton fabric because Tencel has better mechanical 06 Ring frame Toyota RY-4
and comfort properties because of the presence of water in its
crystalline structure. The use of regenerated blends to optimize 2.2.2 Fabric samples preparation
their properties has not been reported yet. The mechanical,
thermal, and comfort properties have been evaluated and Plain woven fabrics of 120 gsm having construction of 76 × 68
reported in this study. per inch were prepared on CCI loom (model SL 8900S) made
of Taiwan. The loom had a reed of 35 with a speed of 36 picks/
min. The total number of warp ends was 1120.
2. Materials and Methods
2.2.3 Fabric Processing
2.1 Materials
The sample fabrics were first desized (detail is given in Table
Cotton as well as the regenerated fibers (bamboo, viscose, 4) and then scoured and bleached (detail is given in Table 5).
modal and Tencel) were used in this work. The specifications
of all fibers used in this research are elaborated in Table 1. Table 4. Detail of Desizing process
http://www.autexrj.com/ 81
2.2.4 Testing
http://www.autexrj.com/ 82
3.2. Mechanical Properties of Fabrics Pilling is a fabric surface defect due to fiber movement or
slippage of yarns caused by abrasion and wear. Pilling occurs
The graphical representation of tensile and tear strength of the in four steps: fuzz formation, entanglement, growth, and wear
woven fabrics is given in Figure 2. Tencel:modal fabric in warp off. The formation of fuzz and pills influence the fabric surface,
wise and weft wise gives the higher tensile strength (24 kgf) which affects the esthetics and durability of a fabric and its
than other fabrics. It is due to higher strength of Tencel:modal acceptance by consumers. Similarly, abrasion is the rubbing
yarn because tensile strength mainly depends on the strength of a textile surface over another surface, which damages the
of yarn and fibers. Considering the warp-wise direction, the fibers, yarns, and fabrics. The results of propensity to pilling
tensile strength of Tencel:viscose and Tencel:bamboo fabrics of fabrics and their abrasion resistance are given in Table 8.
was 24 and 21 kgf, respectively, however; cotton fabrics has Cotton shows more pilling and lower abrasion resistance;
a strength of 24 kgf, which is similar to that of Tencel:viscose however, Tencel:modal, Tencel:viscose, and Tencel:bamboo
because their yarns have same strength. Similar is the case in have lower pilling and higher abrasion resistance than other
the weft-wise direction as can be seen in Figure 2a. blends. Pilling and abrasion resistance depends on numerous
factors such as fiber type, inherent mechanical properties of
Tear strength depends on the yarn strength and yarn mobility the fibers, fiber dimensions, yarn structure, and construction
in the fabric structure. The yarn mobility further depends on and thickness of the fabrics. Cotton gives more pilling and
the yarn twist and fiber and yarn smoothness. Fabric weave lower abrasion resistance because cotton fibers have lower
being same has no effect in this work. The maximum tear extension at break and work of rupture and lower ability to
strength (Figure 2b) in both warp and weft directions is given withstand repeated distortion and, hence, offer less resistance
by Tencel:modal fabric because of the higher strength of to pilling and abrasion.
Tencel:modal yarns. Cotton yarns were given more twist than
the yarns other than cotton as these have lesser fiber length 3.3. Comfort Properties
(27 mm). So cotton fabric has minimum tear strength in both
warp and weft directions as the yarn is less strong, more rigid, 3.3.1. Air Permeability
and less smooth because of more twist and more irregularities
(number of imperfections, IPI = 137). Tencel:viscose has more For a woven fabric, nature of fiber, yarn twist, yarn linear
tear strength (although yarns have same strength and twist) density, and yarn structure affect the air permeability. As yarn
than Tencel:bamboo because Tencel:viscose yarn (IPI= 28.2) twist is increased, the yarn diameter and the cover factor are
is smoother than Tencel:bamboo yarn (IPI = 41.4) so yarns decreased, resulting in increase in the air permeability. Increase
may have better mobility in Tencel:viscose fabrics. in yarn twist may also make more circular yarn, making the
Figure 2. (a) Tensile strength and (b) tear strength of woven fabrics
Table 8. Mechanical properties of fabrics, pilling scale 1 to 5 (1 = dense surface fuzzing and/or severe pilling and 5 = no change).
http://www.autexrj.com/ 83
fabric more air permeable. Fabrics having higher-density yarns drawing water through capillary action (wicking) which makes it
are closely packed in a tight woven structure, with reduction a comfortable fiber [20]. Considering Figure 4b, Tencel:viscose
in air permeability [17-18]. Fiber cross section affects on the and Tencel:bamboo give better moisture management than
intra-yarn spaces, which further affects the fabric porosity [19]. cotton, which is due to the Tencel fibers that absorbs and
Tencel:modal fabric (Figure 3a) gives maximum air permeability spreads moisture readily.It has nano-channels (present in
(605 mm/s). Modal and Tencel fibers have such fiber structure core) through which water is transported making it efficient in
containing channels that increase the porosity of fabric. moisture management. Tencel has a unique fibril structure,
Tencel:viscose and Tencel:bamboo have an air permeability tiny components that make up the fiber. Submicroscopic
of 530 and 516 mm/s, respectively, and, hence, are more air channels between the individual fibrils regulate the absorption
permeable than cotton (391 mm/s). Tencel:Viscose is more air and release of moisture. Tencel completely absorbs and then
permeable than Tencel:bamboo, which might be due to more releases the moisture outside, giving the wearer a comfortable
regularity of Tencel:viscose yarn (IPI = 28.2). Cotton fabric is feel [21].
least air permeable as cotton fiber is coarser (1.46 dtex) than
other fibers (1.3 dtex), so cotton fabric has less intra-yarn 3.3.3. Thermal resistance
spaces. Moreover, cotton yarns have more imperfections (IPI
= 137), which may cause more air resistance giving less air Figure 3c presents the thermal resistance of the woven
permeability. fabrics. In this work, as yarn and fabric parameters are same,
the thermal resistance mainly depends on the nature of the
3.3.2. Moisture Management fibers. Tencel:modal provides more heat resistance than
Tencel:bamboo, Tencel:viscose, and cotton. As bamboo and
Moisture management is a one-way transport of moisture and viscose are thermally conductive than cotton [22-23], Tencel
overall moisture management capacity (OMMC) of a fabric [5]. proves to be more thermal resistant. The nanostructure
The results for OMMC are given in Figure 3b. The Tencel:modal, of Tencel fibers is different from the other known cellulose
Tencel:viscose, and Tencel:bamboo fabrics give better moisture fibers. Nanostructure of Tencel consists of the nanofibrils and
management than cotton fabrics. Cotton, bamboo, and viscose nanochannels that manage the moisture of the body produced
fibers are hygroscopic but the moisture regain of cotton fiber in case of perspiration or sweating [24]. This property of Tencel
is 8.5% compared to 11% for bamboo and viscose fibers; thus has made it thermally resistive. Cotton fabrics show the least
they readily absorb water. Hence, bamboo and viscose fibers thermal resistance. It is due to their intrinsic convolutions
absorb more than they spread, resulting relatively in lower present in cotton fiber, which offers thermal resistance by
OMMC as compared to cotton fiber. It is generally known that entrapping air in the convolutions. This air captures the body
cotton has moisture absorption ability. Lumen appears in the heat which is slowly released. But the thermal resistance of
center when fiber matures. Lumen helps in water absorption by cotton is less when compared to Tencel and modal. Although
Figure 3 (a) Air Permeability, (b) Moisture Management, (c) Thermal Resistance of fabrics
http://www.autexrj.com/ 84
http://www.autexrj.com/ 85