Scribd
Upload
2K views

Practical Research 1 Rubrics

This document contains a rating sheet for evaluating research papers with several key dimensions. It evaluates the scope and theoretical dimension (10%), methodological dimension (10%), discussion, analysis and interpretation (20%), research value (20%), documentary video (20%), and presentation and interaction (20%). Each dimension contains specific indicators that are scored on a scale. The highest possible total score is 100 points.

Uploaded by

AllanSalardaAdem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views

Practical Research 1 Rubrics

This document contains a rating sheet for evaluating research papers with several key dimensions. It evaluates the scope and theoretical dimension (10%), methodological dimension (10%), discussion, analysis and interpretation (20%), research value (20%), documentary video (20%), and presentation and interaction (20%). Each dimension contains specific indicators that are scored on a scale. The highest possible total score is 100 points.

Uploaded by

AllanSalardaAdem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Department of Education

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION CENTER


SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Lapu-Lapu City

RATING SHEET FOR RESEARCH PAPER EVALUATION

DIMENSION INDICATORS SCORE


SCOPE AND 1. Significance and value of the research and soundness
THEORETICAL of conceptualizations. (2 pts)
DIMENSION 10% 2. Universality of the problem/theories and relevance to
applicable field of discipline. ( 2 pts)
3. Information and literature presented provide clear
understanding and connection to research’s dimension.
( 2 pts)
4. The Rationale has compelling reasons for the study. (2
pts)
5. Clear statement of the problem and its scope. (2 pts)
METHODOLOGICAL 1. Presentation of clear research design identifying the
DIMENSION type of the study. (2 pts)
10% 2. Manner of selecting the subjects, sample size, research
setting and sampling techniques. (2 pts)
3. Adequate information on the preparation, selection and
validation of the research instrument. (2 pts)
4. Manner of data gathering, taking into account the validity
and reliability of data. (2 pts)
5. There is a clear work plan and schedules (2 pts).
DISCUSSION, 1. Comprehensive discussion and interpretation of the
ANALYSIS AND findings. (6 pts)
INTERPRETATIVE 2. In-depth analysis significantly connected to the
DIMENSION research literature. (6 pts)
20% 3. Drawing out of clear conclusion and sound
recommendations. (6 pts)
4. Ethical consideration regarding rationalization and
disclosure of the results of the study. (2 pts)
RESREARCH 1. The study has a relevant significance to the taken
VALUE (20%) strand/track (5 pts)
2. The study has a global Impact. It has high potential to
be accepted for international funding (UNESCO, UN,
British Council, Women’s Group) –(5pts)
3. The study has a socio-cultural and academic use in
local and national context (10 pts)
Documentary Video 1. The documentary is based on the sub problems sought
20% in the study (5 pts)
2. The documentary is presented in artistic and visually
stimulating manner (10 pts)
3. It promotes values and provides clear message based
on the problem, findings, conclusion of the study (5 pts)
Presentation and 1. The presentation is concise and understandable with
Interaction good rapport and disposition. (15 pts)
20% 2. The presenter/s are able to answer questions and
expound answers (5 pts)
Total HIGHEST POSSIBLE SCORE = 100 points
Rank

You might also like