Didactics September 26Th, 2019 Describing Learners - Chapter N°5 Questionnaire
Didactics September 26Th, 2019 Describing Learners - Chapter N°5 Questionnaire
2019
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Which are those myths related to learners and language learning along their whole intellectual
development? Prioritize the most relevant ones.
2. Build a comparative chart emphasizing those aspects that cause the main difference among young
children, adolescent and adults.
3. Choose two learner categories and describe them.
4. Among the numerous different learners descriptions make a list of those you consider is/are your own
style.
ANSWERS
1. The most popular myths related to learners and language learning are:
Young children learn faster and more effectively than any other age group.
Lynne Cameron suggests that children “reproduce the accent of their teachers with deadly
accuracy”
Carol Read recounts how she hears a young students of hers saying Listen, Quiet now, Attention,
please! In such a perfect imitation of the teacher that “the thought of parody passes through my
head”
Children from about the age of 12 “seem to be far better learners than younger ones in most
aspects of acquisition, pronunciation excluded”.
Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada, reviewing the literature on the subject, point to the various
studies showing that older children and adolescents make more progress than younger learners.
2. Comparative chart
3. Learner differences
Individual variations
If some people are better at some things than others, this would indicate that there are differences in the
ways individuals brains work.
Neuro-Linguistic Programming: these systems are described in the acronym “VAKOG” which stands
for Visual (we look and see), Auditory (we hear and listen), Kinaesthetic (we feel externally, internally
or through movement), Olfactory (we smell things) and Gustatory (we taste things).
Most people, while using all these systems to experience the world, nevertheless have one “preferred
primary system”. Some people are particularly stimulated by music when their preferred primary
system is auditory, whereas others, whose primary preferred system is visual, respond most
powerfully to images. An extension of this is when a visual person “sees” music, or has a strong sense
of different colours for different sounds. The VAKOG formulation, while somewhat problematic in the
distinctions it attempts to make, offers a framework to analyze different student responses to stimuli
and environments.
All people have all of these intelligences, but in each person one (or more) of them is more
pronounced. If we accept that different intelligences predominate in different people, it suggests that
the same learning task may not be appropriate for all of our students. While people with
strong/logical/mathematical intelligence might respond well to a complex grammar explanation, a
different student might need the comfort of diagrams and physical demonstration because their
strength is in the visual/spatial area. Other students who have a strong interpersonal intelligence may
require a more interactive climate if their learning is to be effective.
Converges: these are students who are by nature solitary, prefer to avoid groups, and who are
independent and confident in their wen abilities. Most importantly they are analytic and can impose
their own structures on learning. They tend to be cool and pragmatic.
Conformists: these are students who prefer to emphasize learning “about language” over learning to
use it. They tend to be dependent on those in authority and are perfectly happy to work in non-
communicative classrooms, doing what they are told. A classroom of conformists is one which prefers
to see well-organized teachers.
Communicative learners: these are language use oriented. They are comfortable out of class and
show degree of confidence and a willingness to take risks which their colleagues may lack. They are
much more interested in social interaction with other speakers of the language than they are with
analysis of how the language works. They are perfectly happy to operate without the guidance of a
teacher.
4.