0% found this document useful (0 votes)
546 views13 pages

Ralf Greiner and Mike Bedford - Phytase Analysis

1) Phytases are enzymes produced by microorganisms, plants, and some animals that can hydrolyze phytate. Their ability to do so in vivo is not well understood and is usually only known from in vitro assays. 2) Phytase activity is commonly measured using an assay that detects the amount of inorganic phosphate released from phytate under standardized conditions. However, this may not accurately reflect activity under physiological conditions where factors like pH and substrate accessibility vary. 3) Interpreting phytase activity purely based on FTU units from in vitro assays can be misleading, as conditions in vivo are more complex. Properties like pH stability, substrate specificity, and resistance to degradation are also important

Uploaded by

peteringham
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
546 views13 pages

Ralf Greiner and Mike Bedford - Phytase Analysis

1) Phytases are enzymes produced by microorganisms, plants, and some animals that can hydrolyze phytate. Their ability to do so in vivo is not well understood and is usually only known from in vitro assays. 2) Phytase activity is commonly measured using an assay that detects the amount of inorganic phosphate released from phytate under standardized conditions. However, this may not accurately reflect activity under physiological conditions where factors like pH and substrate accessibility vary. 3) Interpreting phytase activity purely based on FTU units from in vitro assays can be misleading, as conditions in vivo are more complex. Properties like pH stability, substrate specificity, and resistance to degradation are also important

Uploaded by

peteringham
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

Phytase Analysis, Pitfalls and Interpretation of FTU for

Biological Efficacy

Mike Bedford1 & Ralf Greiner2


1AB Vista Feed Ingredients Ltd, Woodstock Court, Blenheim Rd. Marlborough,

Wilts UK. SN8 1QJ


2Max Rubner-Institute,, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food,,

Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering, Haid-und-Neu-


Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Phytases

¾ Occurrence
ƒ identified in microorganisms, plants, and some animal tissue

the ability of phytases to hydrolyse phytate is usually


known only from in vitro assays and information on
their in vivo function is rather limited

¾ Definition
ƒ a subgroup of phosphatases that are capable
of initiating the stepwise dephosphorylation
of phytate

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 2


Phytate-degrading enzymes

¾ acid phytate-degrading enzymes


ƒ histidine acid phosphatases
ƒ cysteine phosphatases
ƒ purple acid phosphatases

¾ alkaline phytate-degrading enzymes


ƒ ß-propeller
p p pphytases,
y Ca2+- dependent
p

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 3


Determination of Phytase Activity

phytase
InsP6 InsP5, (InsP4, InsP3, InsP2, InsP)

PO43- + [Mo7O24]6-

pH = 5.5 H+/acetone
T = 37°C
[sodium phytate] = 5 mM
[PMo12O40]3-

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 4


Phytase Assay

linearity with time substrate inhibition


1.4

1.2
1.2
¾ phytate preparation has to be free of
1
1
other phosphorylated compounds
0.8
0.8 ¾ hydrolysis of phytate has to be limited:
ΔE

ΔE
06
0.6 ƒ hydrolysis
0.6y y pproducts could serve as
substrates for the phytases
0.4 0.4
ƒ the released phosphate might act as
an competitive inhibitor
0.2
0.2

0 0
0 10 20 30 0 1 2 3 4
time substrate [mM]

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 5


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
pH activity profiles
¾ phytate hydrolysis in vivo: pH ≠ constant

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 6


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
pH activity profiles
¾ phytate hydrolysis in vivo: pH ≠ constant

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 7


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
pH activity profiles
¾ phytate hydrolysis in vivo: pH ≠ constant

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 8


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
substrate
¾ phytate accessibility limited (feed matrix, precipitated)

¾ phytate concentration low (KM-values range from <10 to 650 µM)


1.2
¾ interaction, inhibitors,
electrostatic environment 1

¾ presence of other 0.8

ΔE
phosphorylated compounds
0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 1 2 3 4
substrate [mM]

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 9


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
presence of other phosphorylated compounds

broad substrate specificity narrow substrate specificity


relative activity [%]
substrate rel. Activity [%] substrate P1 P2

phytate 100.0 100.0


phytate
p y 100 p-nitrophenyl
p nitrophenyl phosphate 12.3 9.8
p-nitrophenyl phosphate 68 1-naphthyl phosphate 0.7 0.8
1-naphthyl phosphate 49 2-naphthyl phosphate 2.7 2.5
2-naphthyl phosphate 20 2-glycero phosphate 1.9 1.7
2-glycero phosphate 24 , p p
fructose-1,6-diphosphate 8.5 8.5
fructose-1,6-diphosphate 98 fructose-6-phosphate 1.3 1.7
fructose-6-phosphate 5 glucose-6-phosphate 0.4 0.8
glucose-6-phosphate 30
AMP 0 0
AMP 11
ADP 0 0
ADP 87
ATP 0 0
ATP 221
NADP 0 0
GTP 10
Na2H2-pyrophosphate 0 0
Na2H2-pyrophosphate 290
pyridoxal phosphate 0 0
pyridoxalphosphate
id l h h t 14
o-phospho-L-serine 0 0
o-phospho-L-serine 12
GTP 0 0

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 10


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
pH stability and susceptibility to pepsin degradation

¾ pH stability
ƒ residual activity after 24 hrs at pH 2.5
2 5 and 44°C;
C; faba bean phytase: 22%,
22%
P. agglomerans phytase: 31%, Malaysian waste-water bacterium phytase: 95%

¾ susceptibility to pepsin degradation


ƒ in vitro at pH 2.0: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., Malaysian waste-water
bacterium, Yersinia rohdei phytase: more than 80% of initial activity, Aspergillus
niger phytase: 26-42%, Peniophora lycii phytase: 2-20%

ƒ digesta supernatant of the stomach: Bacillus subtilis phytase: 68%,


68% Aspergillus
niger phytase: 60-70%, Peniophora lycii phytase: 59%

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 11


Interpretation of FTU for Biological Efficacy
phytate degradation pathway

¾ phytate degradation pathway / initiation site of phytate dephosphorylation


ƒ animal feeding studies do not give any clear indication that differences in
bioefficacy are based on the position of initiating phytate dephosphorylation

ƒ InsP6 and InsP5 dephosphorylation


p p y capacity
p y seems to be important
p for bioefficacy;
y;
(a complete transformation of dietary phytate into myo-inositol tetra- and –
trisphosphates in the stomach seems to be much more important for bioefficacy of
supplementary
pp y pphytase
y than a complete
p dephosphorylation
p p y of single
g pphytate
y
molecules)

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 12


Thank You Veryy Much
For Your Attention !

Dr. Ralf Greiner


Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering
Max Rubner-Institute
Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food
Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9 • D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: ++49 (0)721 6625 300 • Fax: ++49 (0)721 6625 303
[email protected]
g @ • www.mri.bund.de

MRI – Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering 20.10.2010 13

You might also like