Inductive and Deductive Reasoning 2.2: Essential Question
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning 2.2: Essential Question
Writing a Conjecture
Work with a partner. Write a conjecture about the pattern. Then use your conjecture
to draw the 10th object in the pattern.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
a.
b.
CONSTRUCTING c.
VIABLE ARGUMENTS
To be proficient in
math, you need to justify
your conclusions and Using a Venn Diagram
communicate them
to others. Work with a partner. Use the Venn diagram to determine whether the statement is
true or false. Justify your answer. Assume that no region of the Venn diagram is empty.
a. If an item has Property B, then
it has Property A.
Property A
b. If an item has Property A, then
it has Property B. Property C Property B
c. If an item has Property A, then
it has Property C.
d. Some items that have Property A
do not have Property B.
e. If an item has Property C, then it does not have Property B.
f. Some items have both Properties A and C.
g. Some items have both Properties B and C.
Describe how to sketch the fourth figure in the pattern. Then sketch the fourth figure.
SOLUTION
Each circle is divided into twice as many equal regions as the figure number. Sketch
the fourth figure by dividing a circle into eighths. Shade the section just above the
horizontal segment at the left.
Figure 4
2.
3.
Numbers such as 3, 4, and 5 are called consecutive integers. Make and test a
conjecture about the sum of any three consecutive integers.
SOLUTION
Step 1 Find a pattern using a few groups of small numbers.
3 + 4 + 5 = 12 = 4 3 ⋅ 7 + 8 + 9 = 24 = 8 3 ⋅
10 + 11 + 12 = 33 = 11 3 ⋅ 16 + 17 + 18 = 51 = 17 3 ⋅
Step 2 Make a conjecture.
Conjecture The sum of any three consecutive integers is three times the
second number.
Step 3 Test your conjecture using other numbers. For example, test that it works with
the groups −1, 0, 1 and 100, 101, 102.
−1 + 0 + 1 = 0 = 0 3 ⋅ ✓
100 + 101 + 102 = 303 = 101 3 ⋅ ✓
Core Concept
Counterexample
To show that a conjecture is true, you must show that it is true for all cases. You
can show that a conjecture is false, however, by finding just one counterexample.
A counterexample is a specific case for which the conjecture is false.
Finding a Counterexample
A student makes the following conjecture about the sum of two numbers. Find a
counterexample to disprove the student’s conjecture.
Conjecture The sum of two numbers is always more than the greater number.
SOLUTION
To find a counterexample, you need to find a sum that is less than the greater number.
−2 + (−3) = −5
−5 ≯ −2
4. Make and test a conjecture about the sign of the product of any three
negative integers.
5. Make and test a conjecture about the sum of any five consecutive integers.
Core Concept
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning uses facts, definitions, accepted properties, and the laws of
logic to form a logical argument. This is different from inductive reasoning, which
uses specific examples and patterns to form a conjecture.
Laws of Logic
Law of Detachment
If the hypothesis of a true conditional statement is true, then the conclusion is
also true.
Law of Syllogism
If hypothesis p, then conclusion q.
If these statements are true,
If hypothesis q, then conclusion r.
If hypothesis p, then conclusion r. then this statement is true.
If two segments have the same length, then they are congruent. You know that
BC = XY. Using the Law of Detachment, what statement can you make?
SOLUTION
Because BC = XY satisfies the hypothesis of a true conditional statement, the
conclusion is also true.
— ≅ XY
So, BC —.
If possible, use the Law of Syllogism to write a new conditional statement that follows
from the pair of true statements.
a. If x2 > 25, then x2 > 20.
If x > 5, then x2 > 25.
b. If a polygon is regular, then all angles in the interior of the polygon are congruent.
If a polygon is regular, then all its sides are congruent.
SOLUTION
a. Notice that the conclusion of the second statement is the hypothesis of the first
statement. The order in which the statements are given does not affect whether you
can use the Law of Syllogism. So, you can write the following new statement.
If x > 5, then x2 > 20.
b. Neither statement’s conclusion is the same as the other statement’s hypothesis.
You cannot use the Law of Syllogism to write a new conditional statement.
What conclusion can you make about the product of an even integer and any
other integer?
SOLUTION
Step 1 Look for a pattern in several examples. Use inductive reasoning to make a
conjecture.
MAKING SENSE
OF PROBLEMS (−2)(2) = −4 (−1)(2) = −2 2(2) = 4 3(2) = 6
In geometry, you will (−2)(−4) = 8 (−1)(−4) = 4 2(−4) = −8 3(−4) = −12
frequently use inductive
reasoning to make Conjecture Even integer • Any integer = Even integer
conjectures. You will also Step 2 Let n and m each be any integer. Use deductive reasoning to show that the
use deductive reasoning conjecture is true.
to show that conjectures
are true or false. You will 2n is an even integer because any integer multiplied by 2 is even.
need to know which type 2nm represents the product of an even integer 2n and any integer m.
of reasoning to use.
2nm is the product of 2 and an integer nm. So, 2nm is an even integer.
SOLUTION
a. Inductive reasoning, because a pattern is used to reach the conclusion.
b. Deductive reasoning, because facts about animals and the laws of logic are used
to reach the conclusion.
8. If 90° < m∠R < 180°, then ∠R is obtuse. The measure of ∠R is 155°. Using the
Law of Detachment, what statement can you make?
9. Use the Law of Syllogism to write a new conditional statement that follows
from the pair of true statements.
If you get an A on your math test, then you can go to the movies.
If you go to the movies, then you can watch your favorite actor.
10. Use inductive reasoning to make a conjecture about the sum of a number and
itself. Then use deductive reasoning to show that the conjecture is true.
11. Decide whether inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning is used to reach the
conclusion. Explain your reasoning.
All multiples of 8 are divisible by 4.
64 is a multiple of 8.
So, 64 is divisible by 4.
2. WRITING Explain the difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
In Exercises 29 and 30, use inductive reasoning to South China 240 330
make a conjecture about the given quantity. Then use Sumatran 200 270
deductive reasoning to show that the conjecture is true.
(See Example 6.) Indo-Chinese 250 400
30. the product of two odd integers 38. HOW DO YOU SEE IT? Determine whether you
can make each conjecture from the graph. Explain
In Exercises 31–34, decide whether inductive reasoning your reasoning.
or deductive reasoning is used to reach the conclusion.
Explain your reasoning. (See Example 7.) U.S. High School Girls’ Lacrosse
Number of participants
31. Each time your mom goes to the store, she buys milk. y
140
So, the next time your mom goes to the store, she will
buy milk. (thousands) 100
34. Each time you clean your room, you are allowed to a. More girls will participate in high school lacrosse
go out with your friends. So, the next time you clean in Year 8 than those who participated in Year 7.
your room, you will be allowed to go out with b. The number of girls participating in high
your friends. school lacrosse will exceed the number of boys
participating in high school lacrosse in Year 9.
ERROR ANALYSIS In Exercises 35 and 36, describe and
correct the error in interpreting the statement.
35. If a figure is a rectangle, then the figure has four sides. 39. MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS Use inductive
A trapezoid has four sides. reasoning to write a formula for the sum of the
first n positive even integers.
y 2 5 8 11 14
Mineral
Talc Gypsum Calcite Fluorite
44. REASONING Use the pattern below. Each figure is
made of squares that are 1 unit by 1 unit. Mohs’
1 2 3 4
rating
Maintaining Mathematical Proficiency Reviewing what you learned in previous grades and lessons
Determine which postulate is illustrated by the statement. (Section 1.2 and Section 1.5)
E
A B
C
50. m∠ DAC is equal to the absolute value of the difference between the
&&&⃗ and &&&⃗
real numbers matched with AD AC on a protractor.