Introduction - : Summons Should Be Accompanied by The Plaint
Introduction - : Summons Should Be Accompanied by The Plaint
A summon is served when a suit has been initiated by the plaintiff against the defendant,
the court directs to issue summons to the defendant as this ensures a fair trail. If the
summons are not duly served then no action can be taken against the defendant.
If on serving of the summon and the person against whom it had been issued does not
appear in the court then this will be taken as a Contempt of Court and shall be punished
accordingly.
Section 27 and Order 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure deals with the service of summons
to the defendant and in the Code of Criminal Procedure, from section 61 to 69 deals with
the topic of summons.
Rule 2 requires that summons in the name of defendant must be accompanied by the
plaint or, if the court so permits, by a concise statement. This requirement is also not
complied with in most of the cases. In my view, which is also supported by a judgment of
honourable Lahore High Court, the judge issuing the summons should also pass an
explicit direction to office that summons should be issued with the copy of plaint attached
with it.
Below are the content relating to summons under CrPc.
Every summons issued by a court under this Code shall be in writing, in duplicate, signed
by the presiding officer of such court or by such other officer as the High Court may,
from time to time, by rule direct, and shall bear the seal of the court.
(1) Every summons shall be served by a police officer, or subject to such rules as the
State Government may make in this behalf, by an officer of the court issuing it or other
public servant.
(2) The summons shall, if practicable, be served personally on the person summoned, by
delivering or tendering to him one of the duplicates of the summons.
(3) Every person on whom a summons is so served shall, if so required by the serving
officer, sign a receipt therefore on the back of the other duplicate.
Where the person summoned cannot, by the exercise of due diligence be found, the
summons may be served by leaving one of the duplicates for him with some adult male
member of his family residing with him, and the person with whom the summons is so
left shall, if so required by the serving officer, sign a receipt therefore on the back of the
other duplicate.
Explanation :- A servant is not a member of the family within the meaning of this section.
If service cannot by the exercise of due diligence be effected as provided in section 62,
section 63 or section 64, the serving officer shall affix one of the duplicates of the
summons to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the person
summoned ordinarily resides, and thereupon the court, after making such inquiries as it
thinks fit, may either declare that the summons has been duly served or order fresh
service in such manner as it considers proper.
(1) Where the person summoned is in the active service of the Government, the court
issuing the summons shall ordinarily send it in duplicate to the head of the office in
which such person is employed: and such head shall thereupon cause the summons to be
served in the manner provided by section 62, and shall return it to the court under his
signature with the endorsement required by that section.
Proof of service in such cases and when serving officer not present- Section –
68 –
(1) When a Summons issued by a court is served outside its local jurisdiction, and in any
case where the officer who has served a summons is not present at the hearing of the
case, an affidavit, purporting to be made before a Magistrate, that such summons has
been served, and a duplicate of the summons purporting to be endorsed (in the manner
provided by section 62, or section 64) by the person to whom it was delivered or tendered
or with whom it was left, shall be admissible in evidence, and the statements made
therein shall be deemed to be correct unless and until the contrary is proved.
(2) The affidavit mentioned in this section may be attached to the duplicate of the
summons and returned to the court.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the preceding section of this Chapter, a court
issuing a summons to a witness may in addition to and simultaneously with the issue of
such summons, direct a copy of the summons to be served by registered post addressed to
the witness at the place where he ordinarily resides or carries on business or personally
works for gain.
The next provision which is relevant to the discussion is rule 5 which is being ignored
and violated with impunity by every court, which is reproduced as under for ready
reference:
Summons to be either to settle issues or for final disposal. The Court shall determine, at
the time of issuing the summons, whether it shall be for the settlement of issues only, or
for the final disposal of the suit; and the summons shall contain a direction accordingly:
Provided that, in every suit heard by a Court of Small Causes, the summons shall be for
the final disposal of the suit.
The mentioned rule requires that the court is bound to determine, before issuance of
summons, whether the summons shall be issued for settlement of issues only or for the
final disposal of the suit. In my almost 15 years of practice I have not seen any single
order of a civil judge specifically determining that what kind of summons, either for
settlement of issues or for final disposal of the suit should be issued. I have also noticed
that in many cases the summons are issued for final disposal rather than for settlement of
issues which is such an illegality which may render the whole subsequent proceeding of
the suit as nullity.
Here another question arises which need to be briefly addressed before further going on
viz. why there is no provision for summoning of defendant for simple appearance or for
filing written statement. It would be also hard for some of us to understand that how the
summons for settlement of issues may be issued without first requiring the defendant to
file written statement. The key to resolve these confusions lies in rule 7 & Form No. 2 of
Appendix B of First Schedule of CPC. Form No. 2 is reproduced as under:
SUMMONS FOR SETTLEMENT OF ISSUES (O.5, rr. 1, 5.)
(Title)
To,
WHEREAS_____________________________________________________________
has instituted a suit against you for ______ you are hereby summoned to appear in this
Court in person or by a pleader duly instructed, and able to answer all material questions
relating to the suit, or who shall be accompanied by some person able to answer all such
questions, on the day of day of 19___, at o'clock in the _______ noon, to answer the
claim ; 6[and further you are hereby directed to file on that day a written statement of
your defence and to produce on the said day all documents in your possession or power
upon which you base your defence or claim for set-off or counter-claim, and where you
rely on any other document whether in your possession or power or not, as evidence in
support of your defence or claim for set-off or counter-claim, you shall enter such
documents in a list to be annexed to the written statement].
Take notice that, in default of your appearance on the day before mentioned, the suit will
be heard and determined in your absence.
GIVEN under my hand and the seal of the Court, this _______ day of _____19____ .