Wealth Management Technology
Wealth Management Technology
Editorial .......................................................................................................... 3
Executive summary ......................................................................................... 4
Wealth managers will increasingly engage head to within the industry and to identify what wealth managers
head in the field of technology. Granted, technology need to do to excel in the digital age.
has always been an important driver in the wealth
The strategic and operational ramifications of digital
management sector, but the intensity of change is about
transformation for wealth managers are significant and
to reach new heights. This report presents the findings
will leave no area of the business untouched. Technology
of a comprehensive research initiative on the state
leaders and IT executives are called upon to forge a
of technology within wealth management. It derives
response to the pressing challenges ahead, and to deliver
critical insights from research, including interviews with
effective solutions in multiple dimensions, such as digital
wealth managers globally, and from an EY proprietary
enterprise strategy, incubation and innovation, experience
benchmark database, that tracks key metrics in the sector
transformation, digital operations and digital trust.
over time. Our goal is to analyze the role of technology
Key findings
• Wealth management is exposed to change on multiple • There are large differences in how wealth managers
fronts, including evolving client needs, market entry of capture value from their technology spend. Three
nontraditional competitors and a shifting landscape of measures can help technology leaders increase the
emerging technology providers. For incumbents, these value delivered by their IT investments: improve
changes represent a source of both opportunity and strategic alignment, right-size demand for IT services
risk. There has never been a more pressing need for and forcefully manage complexity.
action.
• The “one-size-fits-all” operating model for IT is no
• IT executives need to take a central role in retooling longer an option. Each organization must find its own
their organizations for the digital age and aligning IT fit-for-purpose IT operating model that allows it to
spend with the most important digital priorities. Best- manage the slow evolution of core platforms while
practice wealth managers spend more on front-office simultaneously delivering completely new digital
initiatives and outsource more (and get more value for capabilities.
their money) than their peers.
Consensus is growing that wealth management is on the Client behavior too is changing across all segments.
cusp of a digital transformation, with all its opportunities More and more, clients want online tools and mobile
and ruthless ramifications. After years of mounting functionality as well as a seamless customer experience
geopolitical uncertainty, volatile markets and continued that is fast, convenient and intuitive.
margin erosion, the digital age could usher in significant
With investment in innovation and digitization, wealth
opportunities – but who will capture them?
managers can not only enhance efficiency through front-
The operating environment is changing. Technology is to-back automation and leaner processes, but also launch
lowering barriers to market entry, opening the gates to their operations toward the next horizon of growth by
a completely new set of formidable digital competitors upgrading client touchpoints and overhauling their value
armed with innovative capabilities and intent on far- propositions.
reaching disruption. Silicon Valley giants and agile
FinTechs are reshaping the playing field by elevating the
customer experience in many areas of interaction.
The race is on to take advantage of the opportunities accounts using video conferencing. Other wealth
emerging from, and manage the risks integral to, the managers are following suit and digitizing the
digital economy. The ability to innovate quickly and onboarding process using innovative technology, from
effectively is turning into a core asset. Examples of digital electronic signatures and online ID verification to
transformation within wealth management span the biometric authentication.
entire value chain, from client onboarding to fulfilment
• Advice. in Asia, a wealth manager has introduced
and trading. Consider these recent examples of the power
a suite of digital banking tools for tablets and
of digital transformation in wealth management:
smartphones. The app provides personalized content,
• Client onboarding. A wealth manager in Liechtenstein trading tools and opportunities for multichannel
has launched a service that allows clients to open collaboration.
What do wealth clients value? Our 2016 61% of clients aged between 18 and 34
survey of more than 2,000 wealth clients likely to consider robo-advisors, compared
globally1 exposes their preferences in with 51% aged between 35 and 50 or 24%
three dimensions: engagement, trust and aged between 51 and 71. Moreover, it is
performance. In terms of engagement, primarily the (HNW) segment that has the
clients value accurate information, self- greatest awareness of, and preference
service and digital channel capabilities. As for, robo-advice, not the mass affluent or
regards financial performance, they value a emerging HNW segments, as commonly
solid understanding of their financial goals assumed. Over 70% of HNW clients would
and having at their disposal a broad suite consider robo-advice, compared with 37% of
of products and tools. Through the prism mass affluent clients.
of trust, clients value transparency in fees,
Advances in technology are offering wealth
transaction security and data confidentiality
managers new ways of serving their clients.
the most.
However, research shows that meeting
Expectations of clients on their wealth enhanced client expectations can prove a
managers are changing, with digital major challenge for incumbents.
channels being a good case in point. A
At the same time, simply meeting
majority (59%) of the wealth clients state
expectations may not always be enough.
that digital will be their preferred channel
Big data, advanced analytics or artificial
for receiving advice within the next two to
intelligence are creating opportunities for
three years.
market leaders to stay ahead of demand
Most clients are also familiar with robo- by predicting trends and innovating their
advice offerings. Not surprisingly, younger offering.
generations are more likely to consider
robo-offerings than older age groups, with
1
“The experience factor: the new growth engine in wealth management,” Global Wealth Management Report 2016,
EYGM Limited, 2016.
A raft of “automated wealth managers”, or A human client advisor is responsible for the
robo-advisors, are storming the gates. investment advice and typically focuses on a
holistic strategy.
Using algorithms to offer financial advice
for a fraction of the price of a real-life client In all cases, the robo-advisor model is built
advisor, they are growing at a rapid pace, on three key pillars:
doubling their assets under management
Rapid technology change cycles.
every few months.
Technology adoption is at the core of most
The service models of robo-advisors range robo-advisors. They are likely to integrate
from automated investment and self-service technology rapidly, especially in areas such
advice to guided advice. With automated as the effective deployment of mobile apps
investment, clients subscribe to wealth and harnessing artificial intelligence for
guidance and advice that is provided and client communication.
implemented without their explicit approval.
Self-service and automation. High levels
Once their account is opened, clients are
of automation and self-service allow robo-
typically treated at “arm’s length” and
advisors to keep their cost base low.
assets managed autonomously by the
wealth manager. Exchange-traded funds Passive investment strategies. Robo-
are often the preferred form of investment. advisors focus on passive investment
With self-service advice, digital tools are strategies, rather than discretionary
provided to support customers in identifying decisions. As a result, there is less, if any,
the scope of service to be provided and need for a human portfolio manager.
create wealth advice and guidance, typically Although the first wave of digital
in relation to specific needs, e.g., retirement competitors has penetrated the sector,
planning. they have so far only captured less than
Wealth managers assess clients with a small 1% of the global market.2 That said, robo-
number of basic questions to determine advice providers are gaining traction
their investment appetite and derive around the globe, and they will improve
recommended portfolios. In the case of their capabilities and expand – that much is
guided advice, remote advice is delivered certain.
over the phone or by video communication.
2
“Ask the Algorithm,” The Economist, 9 May 2015, The Economist Newspaper Limited.
The structure of the FinTech industry is capabilities with solutions from external
changing. While some them players, such providers, determining whom to collaborate
as robo-advisors, are bypassing incumbents with and how will be key.
and targeting end customers directly, a
Several forms of collaboration aimed at
growing number of FinTechs are entering
gaining a competitive edge are emerging.
the market with business-to-business
Acquiring a FinTech provides exclusive
offerings. These players are partnering with,
access to know-how and allows the wealth
and providing services to, wealth managers,
manager to upgrade internal capabilities.
rather than competing head-on.
By partnering with a FinTech, a wealth
Collaborating with a growing ecosystem manager can upgrade internal capabilities
of FinTech service providers can offer by jointly developing nonstandard solutions.
wealth managers the opportunity to And funding FinTechs allows wealth
reduce costs, comply more easily and managers to benefit from exclusive insights
effectively with regulation and, ultimately, and partake in some level of decision-
serve their clients better. An overarching making.
challenge for wealth managers is how
Across wealth management, digital
to “open up” structurally to leverage the
technologies are advancing rapidly. As the
evolving ecosystem of FinTech providers.
digital economy picks up speed, wealth
As wealth managers test new concepts
managers have no choice but to take action
and supplement their in-house technical
or risk falling behind.
The right digital offering can yield attractive benefits, cost-benefit ratio, whether that is video functionality for
ranging from revenue uplift and increased customer relationship managers or self-service for simple trading.
penetration to lower operating costs. Clearly, wealth
• Develop an overall digitization road map. A road map
managers need to act to avoid losing further ground. But
for digital transformation serves multiple purposes:
how strong is the case for change and what is the level of
establishing an implementation plan that sequences
urgency? What capabilities do wealth managers need to
the buildup of digital capabilities over a multiyear time
build and by when? How can wealth managers transform
horizon, galvanizing the organization on the ramp-up
their organizations for the digital age and where should
of resources and know-how around digital and outlining
they place their digital bets?
the investments needed both in the near and long term.
Taking five “no-regret” steps can help shed some light on
• Develop a high-level solution design, and define
these critical questions:
key architecture principles. It is important to seek
• Define digital objectives and criteria for success. consensus on high-level solution design and the
Wealth managers need to define the objectives they underlying architecture principles that will support
are pursuing and what they term “success.” Consider the operationalization of the digital road map. Key
the following examples: increasing client loads per questions to address include: Should user interfaces
relationship manager by 10%, reducing operational cost be designed for mobile devices first? Should iterative
by 15% or achieving client satisfaction ratios of 90% approaches and rapid prototyping be favored in order to
with digital offerings. optimize usability? Should a “buy-before-make” policy
be adopted, combined with in-house development only
• Determine the broader implications across the
for integration?
business and operating model. Successful digital
strategies require changes beyond process and In our view, the success of any digital transformation
technology. Additional areas to keep in mind: client hinges on five core elements: digital enterprise strategy,
segmentation, governance of digital channels, incubation and innovation, experience transformation,
operational readiness, digital product and service digital operations and digital trust.
content and organizational blueprint.
Given the increasing importance of technology, IT
• Assess the digital capabilities needed, and prioritize executives and technology leaders are uniquely positioned
their implementation. Evaluate digital capabilities in to take on a leading role in driving the transformation
terms of their impact (e.g., by assessing client demand) toward digital. In the next chapter, we present a
and the effort needed to implement them. The aim here guidebook for IT executives, designed to help them
is to identify the digital opportunities worth pursuing in navigate the new digital reality.
the short, medium and long term. Prioritization by key
stakeholders will surface those areas with the highest
As digitization spreads, players in the industry are will require IT executives to increase performance of the
dramatically expanding their use of IT to improve the IT function, build new capabilities and learn new skills.
effectiveness of business processes and gain access To gain a view of technology developments shaping
to new revenue streams. This development represents the agenda and to identify key priorities and trends, EY
an enormous opportunity for IT executives and asked IT executives (CIOs and heads of IT) across wealth
technology leaders to forge a new role as the drivers of management businesses globally to share their insights.
transformational change. Doing so successfully, however,
Wealth management is exposed to disruptive change on of IT executives in our research rate new compliance and
a number of fronts, ranging from regulation, emerging regulatory requirements and 70% emerging technology
business models (e.g., robo-advice) and technology trends, such as cloud, robotics or artificial intelligence,
developments (e.g., cloud, robotics, artificial intelligence) as major sources of disruption (Exhibit 1). Emerging
through to innovative IT processes, such as agile and business models, such as new means of advice delivery,
DevOps. is a development considered highly disruptive by 53%.
Only 31% view new IT processes, such as agile, DevOps
Main sources of disruption
or continuous delivery, as a major source of disruptive
From which sources do IT executives expect the bulk change.
of disruption to their wealth management business to
emerge from? Looking at the next two to three years, 87%
New IT processes,
(e.g., agile and DevOps) 31%
Source: EY analysis.
Exhibit 2
Source: EY analysis.
Key areas of digital investment in ongoing and future investment (Exhibit 3). Data
analytics capabilities to support personalization of digital
Wealth managers are investing in digital capabilities
offerings are rated by 40% of respondents as central
in a number of areas, including technology (e.g.,
to their digital investment plans. Incorporating new
cloud, robotics, artificial intelligence), data analytics,
technologies (e.g., robotics and artificial intelligence) is
improvement of the customer experience and integration
considered an investment priority by 50% of respondents,
of third-party application programming interfaces (APIs).
while 37% prioritize integration of third-party APIs. Only
What areas are wealth managers prioritizing in 7% of respondents rate social media monitoring and
ongoing and future digital investment? In total, 63% of management as an investment priority.
respondents are prioritizing improvements to customer
experience and 50% omni-channel access for customers
Improving the
customer experience 63%
(e.g., through customer service design)
Social media
7%
monitoring and management
Source: EY analysis.
Exhibit 4
Cloud infrastructure
We currently operate cloud technology 67%
or are actively considering its deployment
RPA
We currently operate robotics technology or 33%
are actively considering its deployment
Source: EY analysis.
Exhibit 5
Source: EY analysis.
Exhibit 6
No IT strategy for
digital transformation 13%
defined
Source: EY analysis.
80%
Regulatory compliance
77%
57%
Revenue growth and protection
67%
53%
Operational efficiency and improvement
70%
53%
Risk reduction (e.g., cybersecurity)
63%
Source: EY analysis.
Focusing on business priorities, what are the IT function’s of respondents as a priority, both in the short and long
key objectives over the coming years? Digital innovation term. At the same time, 57% consider risk reduction (e.g.,
is viewed as the top priority for IT executives, both in the through cybersecurity) a key priority in the short term,
short and long term (Exhibit 8), with 47% rating digital and more so (63%) in the long term. Likewise, time to
innovation as a priority for the next 12 months, and market is viewed as a priority with increasing importance:
43% as a priority in the next two to three years. Stability 50% see time to market it as a priority within the next
and cost reduction are viewed by 53% of respondents as year, with 67% seeing it as a priority in the next two to
priorities in the next 12 months, and by 47% within two three years.
to three years. Complexity reduction is viewed by 50%
What are the key objectives for your IT function over the
coming years?
% of respondents that agree or strongly agree
53%
Stability
47%
50%
Complexity reduction
50%
57%
Risk reduction (e.g., cybersecurity)
63%
53%
Cost reduction
47%
50%
Time to market improvement
67%
47%
Innovation and digital capabilities
43%
Source: EY analysis.
The responsibilities of IT executives are wide- Disruptive technologies, new “as-a-service” sourcing
ranging: securing targeted benefits from technology models, competition from new players such as FinTech
implementation, ensuring that IT operations are secure players, new cyberthreats and increased commercial and
and screening trends for ways to unlock value with digital regulatory pressures are changing priorities rapidly and
technologies. reshaping the IT function of the future. Wealth managers
should prioritize:
These responsibilities provide IT executives with a unique
vantage point, not only to support but also to drive • Building a high-performance and agile IT organization
and enable the transformation toward digital. To make
• Optimizing IT outsourcing relationships
meaningful progress toward the digital target state, IT
executives will have to renew their focus and double up Forging an IT landscape ready for digital
their efforts in three areas: aligning IT spend with the transformation
most important digital priorities, retooling the IT function Wealth managers can determine the digital readiness of
for the digital age and forging an IT landscape ready for their IT landscapes in a number of ways, by taking both
digital transformation. Taking these steps will allow IT evolutionary and revolutionary approaches. In order to
executives to navigate the new digital reality and achieve develop a fast, flexible and adjustable architecture, the
competitive advantage for their wealth management following steps become necessary:
business.
• Modernizing core IT platforms
Aligning IT spend with the most important digital
priorities • Reducing complexity and rationalizing the IT
landscape
Technology can improve business performance by driving
revenue and reducing overall costs. Understanding Wealth managers should empower their IT executives
where IT spend adds the most value provides a prism on and other technology leaders to play a more meaningful
investment priorities and a focus for benefit realization. role in shaping the technology strategy toward digital.
Wealth managers will benefit from: This requires IT executives to shift away from a supplier
mindset focused on cost-effective utility and toward IT
• Increasing transparency on where IT spend is going leadership that is integrated into discussions of overall
• Making IT spend more effective digital strategy. This approach is sure to contribute
positively to building and innovating the business.
Retooling the IT function for the digital age
The IT function needed by wealth managers tomorrow is a
very different proposition from that of today.
In times of intense competition and margin contraction, Only by making IT costs transparent to the business
wealth managers are trying to stretch capital and and increasing the effectiveness of IT spend can IT
operating budgets, and do more with less. Despite the executives and other technology leaders shift dialogue
increasing importance of technology as wealth managers onto a more productive plane and obtain a deeper, shared
digitize their business and operating models, annual understanding of how IT spend adds value, the top and
budgets for IT continue to be subject to intense scrutiny. bottom line.
EY regularly benchmarks the IT capabilities of wealth (Exhibit 9). IT spend of wealth managers has been
managers to determine IT performance in relation growing, both in absolute and relative terms. In 2013,
to business results. Our benchmark captures relative IT spend was 9.8% of operating expenses and 7.7% of
business performance against several technology operating income. By 2016, IT spend had increased by a
parameters, such as IT cost, architecture and staffing whole percentage point in terms of operating expenses
levels, as well as sourcing models. We calculate key IT and operating income, to 10.8% and 8.7% respectively.
cost ratios in order to pinpoint where individual wealth Measured in relation to assets under management (AuM),
managers are positioned in their IT investment cycles. IT spend averaged 10 basis points of AuM in 2016,
The key ratios calculated are IT cost as a percentage of up from 8 basis points in 2013. Looking at IT spend in
operating income (IT cost-income ratio) and IT cost as absolute terms, a similar picture emerges. Compared with
a percentage of operating expenses (IT share of cost). 2013 (indexed at 100%), IT spend grew by 67% between
Additional relevant metrics are IT outsourcing ratio, IT 2013 and 2016. Over the same period, operating
change and discretionary ratio and unit IT staff costs. expenses grew by a mere 24%, and operating income
by 16%, resulting in an overall deterioration of the cost-
According to our IT benchmarking of wealth managers
income ratio, from 78.4% in 2013 to 84.2% in 2016.
globally, IT spend averaged 10.4% of operating expenses
and 8.2% of operating income between 2013 and 2016
Americas Asia-Pacific
8.2 8.9
7.7 7.9
6.8 13.3
6.3 12.2 11.6
6.1 6.0 5.9 6.1 11.1
10.0
8.0 7.3 7.2
7.1 6.5
2013 2014 2015 2016 Avg 2013 2014 2015 2016 Avg
Western Europe
Global average
8.3 8.7
7.7 8.2 8.2
1
IT share of cost divided by operating expenses.
2
IT cost divided by operating income.
Source: EY analysis.
19 15 11 24 14 18
-11
71
67 67
12 63
Trading 60
12 11
10
10
Operations 25 +11
+11
25 24 40
23
22 36
34 34
30
Risk and 24
14 Customer
compliance 14 19 21 19
14 14
14 relationship 16
mgmt.
Infrastructure 20
16 16 18 Product 14 15 15 17 15
14
mgmt.
2013 2014 2015 2016 Average 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average
Business expense as % of operating income Operating income per internal FTE (USD ‘000)
600
90
500
80
400
70
300
60
200
50
100
0 5 10 15 20 0 20 40 60 80
IT share of cost, % IT spend per internal FTE (USD ‘000)
1
Full-time equivalent.
Source: EY analysis.
The ability to optimize IT spend and free up funds from investments. To improve performance, this group of
“keep-the-lights-on” maintenance for burgeoning digital efficient IT executors should sharpen the focus of
initiatives is a key success factor for IT executives who current IT spending on improving and innovating front-
wish to ready their organizations for the transformation office tools and enablers, e.g., mobile banking or client
toward digital. Freeing up resources for digital initiatives – analytics.
to address concerns around security, regulation,
• High IT spenders. Seventeen percent of wealth
organizational improvement, system maintenance and
managers are high IT spenders. These players exhibit
modernization but also to drive IT-enabled innovation –
above-average IT spending but below-average cost-
can be achieved in a number of ways, including by making
income ratios. For this group, IT investments do not
IT operations more efficient through automation and self-
result in proportional business returns. It is likely that
service or establishing self-funding mechanisms for digital
these players spend too much on running their daily
innovation.
operations and too little on innovation that would set
To identify areas for improvement, we look at the them apart from their competition. High IT spenders
relationship between the overall cost-income ratio and the should reduce spending, invest selectively to improve
IT cost-income ratio (measured as total IT cost divided by business performance and achieve better alignment
operating income). Benchmarking wealth managers along with business objectives. This can be done by evaluating
these dimensions highlights four performance categories IT projects with regard to benefits and cutting projects
(Exhibit 12): that are not strategic.
• Effective business enablers. Thirty-nine percent of • Heavy IT transformers. Twenty-two percent of wealth
wealth managers are effective business enablers. This managers are heavy transformers. These players
group of wealth managers maintain low levels of IT spend heavily on their IT and see proportional business
spending but successfully put IT investments to good returns on their investments. The majority of players
business use. To stay on top of market developments, in this group have undergone high-impact IT-enabled
players in this group should look at opportunities transformation programs with above-average IT
to selectively rebalance IT investments. Building investments for their peer group. Over time, heavy IT
capabilities in strategic areas such as digital or big data transformers should cut back spending without losing
will allow IT to exploit innovations quickly. efficiency and limiting innovations. These players
should improve their governance and performance-
• Efficient IT executors. Twenty-two percent of wealth
management techniques to align IT spending more
managers are efficient IT executors. Players in this
strongly with priorities once specific phases of
category do not invest heavily in IT, but neither do
transformation are complete.
they see high levels of business return on their IT
A B
Cost-ratio (%)
100
90
80
70
60
0 5 10 20
IT cost-income ratio (%)
C D
Best practice
Bubble size represents AuM
Source: EY analysis.
The IT function needed by wealth managers tomorrow organization must find its own fit-for-purpose IT operating
is a very different proposition from that of today. model that allows it to manage the slow evolution
Disruptive technologies, new “as-a-service” sourcing of core platforms while at the same time delivering
models, competition from new players such as FinTech completely new digital capabilities. Increasingly, the
players, new cyber threats and increased commercial and ability to incorporate multiple approaches within a
regulatory pressures are changing priorities rapidly and single IT operating model is turning into a competitive
reshaping the IT function of the future. advantage. In our quest to better understand the nature
and mechanics of high-performing IT functions, we
What is evident from our work with clients is that best-
drilled down into two critical areas: the nature of the IT
practice players are able to create more value from IT
organization itself and its approach toward outsourcing.
through an IT operating model that is efficient, scalable
and flexible. What is also clear is that the “one-size-
fits-all” operating model for IT no longer exists. Each
Three components are essential for building a high- respondents say that their IT function is geared toward
performing IT function: its organizational structure, outsourcing, with IT teams clustered around the interface
its approach toward talent management and its IT to IT outsourcing providers. Another 20% report that their
capabilities and processes. Only by orchestrating IT function is organized along technology towers and
performance across all three building blocks can core technologies. The remaining 17% state that their IT
wealth managers expect to reap the benefits of a high- function is organized around agile mechanisms, with IT
performance IT function. teams applying delivery methods with short development
cycles and continuous software delivery.
A future-proof IT organization
Several correlations emerge when different IT
We asked wealth managers what organizational
organizational models are contrasted against key IT
structures they have in place for their IT function
metrics:
(Exhibit 13). The most prevalent answer (37%) is that
their IT organizational model is designed along the • Wealth managers with a self-reported agile
software development life cycle, with IT teams grouped organizational model are ahead of their peers across a
by functional responsibilities for designing, constructing number of metrics, including change ratio (50% versus
and operating business systems. A total of 27% of peer-group average of 42%), IT share of cost (7.7%
Distribution
(in % of total
participants)
17 20 37 27
IT cost-income
ratio 9.4
(IT cost as % of 8.4 8.3
operating income)
5.7
Operating
income per 387
346 360
banking FTEs 328
(USD ‘000)
IT external staff
IT internal staff
% of total staff of wealth manager
+6.7%
0
9.5 9.6 10.2
8.4
2.8 2.5 3.0
1.7
Source: EY analysis.
Interesting challenges
(e.g., working with innovative 83%
technology)
Way of working
37%
(e.g., interaction work model)
Source: EY analysis.
Retaining internal talent and building on the existing include training programs and job rotation, as well
talent pool, in particular high performers, hinges on as senior and external exposure. Adjustments in
career development and learning opportunities in compensation and incentives may be required to align
combination with reward and compensation systems. with market levels.
Effective measures to foster development and learning
IT capability IT sub-capabilities
1
Self-assessed importance (aggregate average across all sub-capabilities).
Source: EY analysis.
Outsourcing to technology vendors is a critical element from external providers. In markets such as Switzerland,
of the IT operating model. Technology vendors provide where the provider landscape is mature, smaller wealth
a range of benefits, from greater economies of scale managers frequently contract out the majority of their
and access to a lower-cost skill base through to process back office to external providers, often only maintaining
efficiencies derived from experience. customer relationship and risk management in-house.
Almost all wealth managers in our database practice Given the diversity of how IT outsourcing is practiced
some form of IT outsourcing. The average IT outsourcing among wealth managers globally, we asked ourselves
ratio (measured as outsourced IT spend as a percentage how successful wealth managers were in outsourcing
of total IT spend) has remained roughly constant over the parts of their IT function. To answer this question, we
years, averaging 35% across the entire population within split the population of wealth managers into two groups
our database. depending on their relative positioning to the median of
the IT outsourcing ratio. A comparison of those with an IT
The diversity and maturity of external service providers
outsourcing ratio below the median against those above
has evolved over the years. Several outsourcing models
the median surfaced the following findings (Exhibit 17):
are available to wealth managers today, ranging from
pure IT outsourcing (ITO) to business process outsourcing • T
he average IT outsourcing ratio within our population
(BPO). In a self-assessment of their dominant IT sourcing was 35% and the average IT share of cost was just above
model, 41% of wealth managers report that they 10%.
outsource only IT services, 11% that they outsource entire
• T
he IT share of cost (IT spend as a percentage of
business processes within the back office and 48% that
operating expenses) and IT cost-income ratio (IT spend
they operate the majority of their IT in-house. The IT
as a percentage of operating income) was slightly higher
outsourcing ratios vary accordingly between these three
for those with a below-median IT outsourcing ratio.
dominant sourcing models. The average IT outsourcing
ratio is 49% for those who say they outsource mainly • A
s indicated by the value gap, excessive outsourcing
under an ITO model and 68% for those that outsource achieves the opposite result desired. Costs start
mainly under a BPO model. Respondents that report increasing again for an IT outsourcing ratio just above
largely operating their IT in-house show a much lower IT 50%.
outsourcing ratio, averaging 16% across the population. The benefits realized from IT outsourcing often fall short
Wealth managers can outsource different layers of the of expectations. In our experience, the extent to which IT
technology stack, covering infrastructure, applications outsourcing arrangements can deliver maximum value
or a combination of the two. The outsourcing ratios vary hinges on three elements: a capable and committed
depending on the depth of the technology stack that vendor, an optimized relationship between contracting
is outsourced. The IT outsourcing ratio was highest for parties, and a strong retained IT organization that is able
those that outsource both infrastructure and applications, to sustain the benefits. The capabilities of the retained IT
averaging 71% throughout the period under review. organization in particular are essential for delivering the
For those outsourcing only applications, the average IT intended benefits from IT outsourcing. Only a retained
outsourcing ratio was 42%. At 29%, the IT ratio was lowest organization equipped with the correct skills will be able
for those outsourcing only infrastructure. to extract the full value from IT outsourcing.
A comparison of practices between smaller and larger
wealth managers reveals a number of interesting
patterns. Smaller-sized wealth managers outsource
on average 47% of IT operations, a much higher value
compared with larger wealth managers, who report that
they outsource between 32% and 40% of their operations.
Smaller players also frequently leverage the BPO model,
contracting large components of their back-office services
Ø 35
20
10
Value gap
0 20 40 60 80
IT outsourcing ratio (%)
Source: EY analysis.
At the heart of every wealth manager’s IT infrastructure hardware solutions or shifting to newer technologies. One
lies its core IT platform. This is the technology workhorse wealth manager realized that its old and unwieldy core
that processes virtually everything that wealth managers platform was severely hurting its ability to control costs.
do, linking customers to products and services, across the Another found that its platform, made up of multiple
front, middle and back office. incompatible vendor packages and in-house applications,
was limiting its ability to aggregate client data across
Many wealth managers face critical modernization issues
business units.
around their core IT platform, whether that means
managing or moving away from aging software and
The nature of core IT platforms differs among wealth Our analysis of the state of play around core IT platforms
managers in our sample. Only 10% of wealth managers evaluates a number of key metrics: percentage of overall
have developed their core IT platform using internal business functionality embedded in the core IT platform,
development resources (a self-developed IT platform). business efficiency enabled by the core IT platform, and
The core IT platforms of these players is typically older overall satisfaction with the software package and vendor.
than average, covers less functionality and achieves We also evaluate total cost of ownership, taking IT share
lower business efficiency. A large majority (90%) of of cost (IT spend as a percentage of operating expenses)
wealth managers in our sample have installed an external as a proxy for the annual cost of operating the platform.
software package, either off-the-shelf without major
modification (a packaged core IT platform) or with major
modification and customization (a best-of-breed core IT
platform).
83.0 85.0
65.0 70.0 65.0
Ø 73.6
Ø 8.4
3.7
Source: EY analysis.
Fully Highly
standardized customized
Off-the-shelf Best-of-breed
core IT platform core IT platform
• Core IT platform purchased from software • External software package in place,
provider, with minimal customization with large degree of customization
Metrics
Functional coverage
of core IT platform 79.1
60.4
% of business
functionality
provided by core IT
platform
Total cost of
ownership of core
IT platform
8.3
5.9
Platform cost as % of
total operating cost
Source: EY analysis.
Years
12.0
9.4
1.4x
8.6
6.7
IT cost-income ratio
IT share of cost
1
Age of the oldest installed application of the core IT system.
Source: EY analysis.
All wealth managers have an IT architecture, but few of architecture standards or even enforced adherence
control it. This is especially evident in how applications to such standards through governance mechanisms and
are rolled out to support very specific business processes. processes.
More often than not, these applications meet the specific
Our analysis reveals the following (Exhibit 21):
needs of one division or business unit, with little regard
for impact on the broader IT architecture. Over time, the • Wealth managers with a self-assessed low level of IT
IT architecture grows, resulting in duplicated systems, architecture standardization have a significant higher
proliferating and inconsistent data, and makeshift IT share of cost (total annual IT spend divided by total
integration. annual operating cost) than those wealth managers
with a self-assessed high level of IT architecture
The resulting complex IT environment that is common
standardization. More specifically, wealth managers
for many large wealth managers can translate into
stating a high level of IT architecture standardization on
unnecessarily high IT costs and poor service levels. It
average reported an IT share of cost of 9.9% compared
can also make the IT organization less agile, impeding its
with 14% for wealth managers reporting a low level of IT
ability to help the business seize emerging opportunities.
architecture standardization.
An overly complex IT architecture and application
estate can significantly slow down and obstruct the • In comparing IT spend per AuM of wealth managers in
transformation toward digital enablement. Wealth our sample, a similar picture emerges. Wealth managers
managers can reduce their IT cost base and extract more with a low level of IT architecture standardization
value from their application portfolio in two ways: by report 15.5 basis points (bps) IT spend per AuM against
standardizing their IT architecture and by managing their 8.8 bps for those with a high level of IT architecture
application portfolio to optimize value. standardization.
IT share of cost
+26%
% of operating 18.6
expense 15.4 -4%
12.6
Ø 14.0 10.6
9.3 10.3 9.4 9.1
Ø 9.9
1
Based on self-assessment.
Source: EY analysis.
Jason McLean
Partner
EY Asia-Pacific Leader
Technology-enabled Transformation
in Wealth and Asset Management
The authors wish to thank the local coordination team who greatly contributed to the
research and survey work: Philippe Oertli, Pascal Bruhin, Simona Patrut, Stefanie Karrer
and Barbara Brzezek.
The authors also wish to thank those responsible for driving the fieldwork locally across
markets: Taroon Aggarwal, Christopher Calvocoressi, Pascal Vaucouleur, Fabrice Trioullier,
Alex Viale, Patrick Stoess, Ronan Grossiat and Patsy Pang. Special thanks also go to the
regional sponsors who supported the team with oversight and guidance: Scott Becchi,
Keith MacDonald, Dean Brown, Adrian Widmer, Andreas Toggwyler, Olivier Maréchal, Jan
Kehrbaum, Hermin Hologan, Mark Wightman and Jason McLean.
The data analysis would not have been possible without Felix Lange and Felix Laufenberg.
Thanks also go to those who provided valuable content reviews: in particular, Andreas
Toggwyler, Adrian Widmer and Michel Stofer.
Finally, the authors wish to thank Jimena Dupré and Alessandro Spadola for their creative
input and direction. The go-to-market process has been greatly supported by Katherine
Hetzel, Katherine Kurelja and Elizabeth Wynds.
About EY
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory
services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and
confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We
develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises
to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building
a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our
communities.
ED None
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to
be relied upon as accounting, tax or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for
specific advice. The views of third parties set out in this publication are not necessarily the views
of the global EY organization or its member firms. Moreover, they should be seen in the context
of the time they were made.
ey.com/wealthassetmgmt