0500 w14 Ms 12
0500 w14 Ms 12
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner
Report for Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2014 series for
most Cambridge IGCSE®, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some
Cambridge O Level components.
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected
approaches in candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant
knowledge and skills demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and
derived from the passage.
(a) Give two details from paragraph three (‘I was tormented…’) that suggest the writer is
being followed. [2]
(b) Give one word used in the passage which suggests that the narrator is feeling
distressed (paragraph three, line 11). [1]
• tormented
(c) By referring to paragraph eight (‘A twig snapped…’), using your own words, explain:
(i) how the narrator reacts to the sound of the twig snapping, and why [2]
(i) How
Stops / turns / looks into the trees or darkness [1 mark]
Why
Feels he is being watched / followed / threatened / frightened / looks to see what is
making the sound [1 mark]
[1 mark]
(d) Why does the narrator find it difficult to speak at first, and what is his voice like when
he does speak (paragraph nine, ‘My heart beat…’)? [2]
• His throat is too dry to speak (because he is frightened). [1 mark]
• He croaks / squeaks / speaks hoarsely etc. [1 mark]
N.B. Do not accept ‘does not speak clearly’ / ‘speaks in a deep voice’
(e) By referring closely to paragraph nine ('My heart beat...'), using your own words
explain the narrator’s concerns about his journey to the beach. [3]
(f) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by the words in italics in the
following phrases: [6]
(N.B. Do not accept ‘thought / truth’ etc. Look for the idea of an epiphany!)
(N.B. The extremity of the feeling must be conveyed: ‘very’, ‘really’ etc. are not quite
strong enough)
(N.B. Do not accept ‘uncertain’ ‘not sure’ without further qualification such as ‘where to
go’, as they are insufficiently intensive.)
(N.B. Do not accept ‘silent’, ‘quiet’ without further qualification which is required to show
understanding of the idea of slyness / secretiveness.)
(N.B. Do not accept ‘follower’ on its own without some indication of the intent to conceal
or remain hidden e.g. ‘Someone who’s following, hidden and avoiding detection’.)
NB: the definitions above contain the essence of an answer. However, accept that
candidates may respond in different ways, e.g. at greater length.
Be careful not to credit a word actually used in the quoted phrase.
For each of the 3 phrases give 2 marks for a correct explanation in own words; that is 1 mark
per definition of each word. 1 mark for a partially correct explanation.
Possible comments might mention the change in atmosphere; the contrast of and speed
of change of the light; the implications of ‘darker’.
(ii) ‘…only a few small stars pierced the gloom …’ (lines 3–4)
Possible comments might mention the lack of natural light; what light there is cannot
penetrate the darkness; the implications of ‘pierced’ and ‘gloom’.
Possible comments might mention the sense of being threatened by the blackness; the
suggestions of fear and uncertainty; the implications of ‘black’ and ‘mysterious’.
Possible comments might mention the other worldly appearance of the trees; how this conveys a
sense of foreboding; the implications of ‘ghostly’ and ‘silhouette’.
Examiners should observe the following principles when assessing candidates' responses to this
question:
• Question 1 (g) requires a comment on the effectiveness of the writer's use of language for a
particular purpose in the whole phrase quoted.
• Credit should be given to responses that attempt to explain how the writer's choice of
words/images etc. produce the intended response in the reader's mind.
• When marking these responses, we are looking for evidence that candidates have some
appreciation of the appropriate associations and suggestions in the writer's choice of words.
• There are, therefore, no specific right or wrong answers to this task. We should award marks on
the quality of linguistic analysis shown by the candidate in order to support her/his interpretation
of the writer's purpose.
• It is not necessary for candidates to show knowledge of the names of different figures of speech
(simile, metaphor etc.) to produce a successful answer - what we are looking for is an
understanding of how the writer uses any such literary devices.
• Remember that 2 is the maximum mark for any one explanation and that candidates are likely to
comment on each phrase in one or two lines only. This fact should be borne in mind when
applying the descriptors in the table below.
• N.B. This question is marked out of a total of 6 (2 marks for explanation of each phrase).
However, it is fully acceptable to award a holistic mark for this question (e.g. a maximum of 5 out
of 6) especially when a partial understanding of the effects of some of the chosen phrases is
implied.
2 There will be a secure understanding of the phrase and of the writer's purpose for choosing
marks the language used in it. There will be an appreciation of how the suggestions and
associations of the vocabulary/imagery used contribute to the writer's purpose and a
convincing attempt to explain how this effect is achieved. N.B. 2 marks can be awarded to a
response that contains an interpretation different from that anticipated if there is a convincing
explanation given.
1 Responses gaining 1 mark will show understanding of the phrase as a whole and show some
mark awareness of the writer's purpose for choosing the language used in it. However, this is likely
to be only partially explained and an awareness of how this is achieved is likely to be implied
rather than specifically explained.
0 Responses gaining 0 marks will either show complete misunderstanding of the phrase or
marks simply list the figure(s) of speech used by the writer without further comment.
The follower:
(1) a shapeless lump (N.B. Credit attempts to use own words)
(2) moves stealthily / quietly /stalks the narrator / keeps to the shadows / stays close
(3) echoes footsteps / stops when narrator stops
(4) makes a faint rustling sound when moving / stumbles
[Total: 30]
Imagine that you are the narrator. On your return home you write an article for a newspaper
about what happened on the remote island.
• who or what your follower turned out to be, and what happened next.
You should base your ideas on what you have read in the passage, but do not copy from it.
Address each of the three bullet points.
Write between 1 and 1½ sides, allowing for the size of your handwriting.
Up to 10 marks are available for the content of your answer, and up to 10 marks for the
quality of your writing. [20]
The most successful responses will derive convincingly from the text. The description of the follower
and the narrator’s response to it will be developed in some detail. There will be a sensible and
credible attempt to bring the story to a conclusion but be prepared to credit responses that end
deliberately with a cliff-hanger. Less successful responses are likely to be over reliant on the content
of the original passage and to lift sections of it with little attempt to develop suggestions in the extract
about the follower and what happened next. Explanations that lack credibility or do not sustain the
tone of the original are unlikely to gain a Band 1 mark for Reading.
It is important not to allow the quality of a candidate’s writing to influence the Reading mark (and
vice versa). Reading points must be tethered to the passage, and derive from it.
Uses and develops several ideas, both factual and inferential, from the
passage. Develops details to give a perceptive and convincing
Band 1 9–10
explanation of the narrator’s thoughts/feelings, the description of the
follower and what eventually happened.
Refers to several details from the passage and makes some reference
to the narrator’s thoughts and feelings. Some attempt to describe the
Band 2 7–8
follower that is consistent with details in the passage and to explain
what eventually happened.
May retell the passage or give occasional relevant facts. There may be
Band 5 1–2 examples of misunderstanding or lack of clarity in attempting to use the
passage.
N.B. The ability to fulfil the requirements of the third bullet point is a distinguishing feature of
responses in Bands 1 and 2. To achieve Band 1 there should be sustained development of the
point, either of one paragraph or more at the end of the response or consistently throughout.
Two or three relevant sentences addressing this point may be sufficient for a Reading mark in
Band 2.
The response is very simply written and there are occasional examples
of blurred meaning. The structure can usually be followed. Some error is
Band 4 3–4
serious, affecting meaning. The response may be over-dependent on
lifted material.
Add the marks for Reading and Writing to give a total mark out of 20 for Question 2.
[Total: 20]