See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/279682339

Assessment of the Traits of Facilities Management Key Drivers in South-

Western Nigerian Hotels

Article · May 2012

DOI: 10.5539/jms.v2n2p163

CITATIONS READS

0 1,831

3 authors, including:

Olufemi Durodola Ayedun Caleb

Covenant University Ota Ogun State, Nigeria Covenant University Ota Ogun State, Nigeria
19 PUBLICATIONS   42 CITATIONS    21 PUBLICATIONS   57 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Risk and Return Assessment of Commercial Real Estate and Equity Diversification in Investment Portfolios in Nigeria. View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Olufemi Durodola on 17 January 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Journal of Management and Sustainability; Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012
ISSN 1925-4725 E-ISSN 1925-4733
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

Assessment of the Traits of Facilities Management Key Drivers

in South-Western Nigerian Hotels
Olufemi Daniel Durodola1, Caleb Abiodun Ayedun1 & Ibidunni Seun Onipede2
1
Department of Estate Management, School of Environmental Sciences, College of Science and Technology,
Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria
2
Department of Estate Management, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
Correspondence: Olufemi Daniel Durodola, Department of Estate Management, School of Environmental
Sciences, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, P.M.B 1023, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria.
E-mail: [email protected]

Received: January 16, 2012 Accepted: May 7, 2012 Online Published: May 31, 2012
doi:10.5539/jms.v2n2p163 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jms.v2n2p163

Abstract
A survey was conducted of probabilistically determined fifty-seven hotels of various ‘stars’ in South-Western
geo-political zone of Nigeria to assess the traits of the General Managers (GMs) and Facilities’ Managers (FMs)
who are regarded as key facilities management drivers in hotel organizations. Data were collected from hotel
organizations through their general managers and facilities/engineers/maintenance managers with the aid of
questionnaires. A combination of stratified and cluster sampling techniques were used. Kothari’s formula was
adopted to determine the appropriate sample size while descriptive statistics, ranking and spearman correlation
were used for data analysis. Covey’s generated traits for effective people were used as baseline parameters for
the assessment. It was found that the GMs and the FMs background, training and features in South-Western
Nigerian hotels cannot be said to be poor or low in that they compared favorably with what obtains in advanced
countries particularly United State of America. However, they lack international exposure. In terms of traits,
using Covey’s model as benchmark, the duo are below average managerially, lacking the dynamism and the
pizzazz that are required to propel them along; and since they are responsible for facilities management
implementation, it then implies that the objectives of the facilities management may be extremely hampered
from being achieved. In essence, the exposure of the GMs and the FMs must be deliberately improved upon
while the duo must as a matter of urgency cultivate the habit of learning how to be effective.
Keywords: facilities management, hotel, human traits, strategic management, sustainable development
1. Introduction
Arditi and Nawakorawit (1999), Nebel, et al (2002), Hayes and Ninemeier (2007) and Durodola and Oloyede
(2011) variously identified maintenance management, property management, and facilities management as asset
management styles prevalent in the hospitality industry, although at varying degrees. In addition, Durodola,
Ajayi and Oloyede (2011) averred that hotels that adopt facilities management as asset management tool as
against maintenance management or property management are more effective in service delivery. Nevertheless,
maintenance management predominates in the running of hotels (Hassanain, Froese and Vanier 2003) while
property management is used to a limited degree (Durodola and Oloyede, 2011); yet, no condemnation has been
recorded about the tools which points to human dimension or environment problem within which the tools are
being implemented.
Smith (2003) asserted that facilities management concerns people and places; people are generally both the
single biggest cost and asset center for any business or organization and whether as employee, manager,
management or customer, they influence the degree of success of any operation or organization. By implication
therefore, the success of facilities management as asset management style in hotel setting is greatly influenced by
its drivers which, in this case are the General Manager (GM) and the Facilities Manager (FM). The impact of the
duo is influenced by their traits as asserted by Odusami (2001) and Covey (2004). Thus, it is essential to examine
the traits of the General Managers (GMs) and Facilities Managers (FMs) that drive facilities management within
hotel setting with a view to establishing the influence they wield in order to make facilities management an
effective asset management tool.

163
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

The hotel and hospitality industry is a major area of the Nigerian economy which should attract investigation of
the traits of facilities management key drivers as property asset management tool. This industry is crucial to the
growth and development of tourism as a foreign exchange earner for many nations. The hotel organizations are
not immune to the influences of the economy and business cycles, so the difficulties that befall business in
general during economic down-turns also affect them (Rutherford, 2002). The acclaimed benefits of facilities
management in turning the fortune of organizations around for better would be weakened or unrealizable if the
drivers themselves lack drive and initiative. According to Opaluwah (2005); Adewunmi and Ogunba (2006);
Durodola, Ajayi and Oloyede (2011) the responsiveness of the Nigerian society to facilities management is
extremely low particularly within the hotel sector; and it is imperative that all impediments to accelerated
facilities management implementation be identified and removed if Nigerians are to enjoy the benefits associated
with holistic application of facilities management.
With this background, the aim of this research is to examine the traits of facilities management key drivers in
hotel sector of the South-Western Nigerian economy, namely the General Managers and the Facilities Managers.
In order to achieve the aim, the paper is structured into five major segments namely introduction, literature
review, the research method, result and discussion and finally conclusion and recommendations.
2. Literature Review
Rutherford (2002) examined the organization of hotels by tracing hotel organization development in the United
States at the turn of the twentieth century. Basically, hotel organizations were built around the chef (“king” of the
kitchen) and the “maitre d’hotel” or the master of the hotel, and over time the hotel organization structures changed
with radical changes in management. The hotel organization structure was based on line and staff structure
hierarchically organized with the GM at the top and assisted by the Executive Assistant Manager to whom reports
the line managers consisting of the Rooms’ Divisional Head, Personnel, Accounting, Marketing and Sales,
Engineering, Purchasing, Food and Beverage heads. This had been buttressed by Hayes and Ninemeier (2007) in
their review of the organization charts of small, large and mega hotels in America as shown in Figure 1. The
Rutherford (2002) and Hayes and Ninemeier (2007) studies are factual in that they have identified people that
matters in the running of the hotels.

Figure 1. Typical hotel organization chart showing the GM’s position and the line staff
Source: Rutherford (2002)

Eddystone and Nebel (2002)’s was more conservative than Rutherford (2002) in that they accepted the line and
staff organization structure but seemingly overlooked the Engineering Department without suggesting an
alternative to keep the facilities going and functional; while Conklin (2002) was more radical in approach by
introducing the reverse organization chart as shown in Figure 2. The Conklin (2002)’s study is innovative and

164
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

qualitative, emphasizing the need to take into cognizance three inter-related partners in the hotel running; which
are, the customers, employees and the General Manager (GM). This has introduced the human dimension into the
research activities involving facilities management and hotel organizations.

Guests

Associates

Management

GM

Figure 2. Reverse organization chart

Source: Conklin (2002)

Nebel and Ghei (2002) argued that hotel GM is the central management figure in the hotel business and
attempted to develop a conceptual framework of the hotel General Manager’s job based on job demands and
relationship issues in the short-, intermediate- and long run. The aim of the study was to determine the nature of
the GM’s job, and consequently develop a conceptual framework. This was premised on the study of ten
extremely successful GMs of some America’s finest hotels that exhibited the fullest range of operational and
managerial complexity. It adopted a combination of participant observation of GMs activities, extensive personal
interviews of GMs and fifty-three key divisional heads, background surveys, and analysis of organizational and
operational information from each hotel; and developed a model of the influences that shape the GM’s job giving
prominence to the GM of hotel organizations at the expense of the line managers, staff and customers as shown
in Figure 3.

Specific
Job Functions

Hotel context:
- Job demands
- Relationship THE GM’S JOB
issues

Generic Managerial
Work Roles

Figure 3. Influences that shape the general manager’s job

Source: Nebel and Ghei (2002)

Nebel and Ghei (2002) asserted that for hotels’ GMs to be effective at all three job functions (Operational
Controller, Organizational Developer, and Business Maintainer) they are required to perform a large variety of

165
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

managerial work roles. While GMs perform all ten of Mintzberg (1975)’s managerial work roles, they must be
particularly effective at seven of them to be successful operational controllers, organizational developers, and
business maintainers. They must develop the wide variety of skills necessary to play the work roles of leader,
liaison, monitor, disseminator, disturbance handler, entrepreneur, and resource allocator.
Torkildsen (1992) asserted that quality management calls for quality managers; although good management counts,
it may not necessarily and at all the times be the result of good general managers. However, it is obvious that hotels
cannot function without the facilities working efficiently through the active participation of line managers in
particular facilities manager or the engineer or maintenance manager whatever be the nomenclature that is
assigned to him.
Hayes and Ninemeier (2007) corroborating Nebel and Ghei’s (2002) opined that regardless of size, every hotel and
lodging facility must have a leader that makes the final day- to- day decisions about how the facility operates. From
the mega hotels to the smallest bed-and-breakfast (B and B), the individual is critical to the hotel’s image, its
reputation for guest service, and most importantly, its ultimate profitability. Although this person’s job title may
vary depending on the hotel’s size, the traditional term variously being used is the General Manager (GM) and his
responsibilities are inclusive of investor relations, brand affiliation management, community relations, executive
committee facilitation, and property management. By and large, it is impossible to discuss or navigate hotel
business operations without reviewing or talking about the GM whose traits are so important and crucial and must
necessarily be investigated to ensure effectiveness in the service operations.
Woods, et al (2002) attested to the enviable position of the GMs by averring that researchers’ focus on GMs was
not without good reason and that no single position had greater effect on the success of a hotel facilities
management. Their study focused on course of study, demographic profile, training requirements and
compensation package among the GMs and adopted a survey research approach with participants randomly drawn
from the American Hotel and Motel Association (AH & HA) database using questionnaire and descriptive
statistical techniques. It found that the average age of GMs was 46 years, major educational achievement been the
bachelor’s degree while the highest professional qualification was obtained from Chartered Hotel Association
(CHA). Furthermore, although the management history is variable it includes years in lodging industry before first
management job being 3.14 years; years from first management job to General Manager being 9.27 years; years as
General Manager, 11.58 years; and 5.77 years in current GM position. The high point of the findings was that the
GMs considered a strongly ‘business-focused’ curriculum to be most valuable for a person aspiring to GM’s job.
Odusami (2001) opined that for ideal project leader, line and facilities managers to be effective, they require
important skills and must possess desirable attributes, which are defined as ‘quality ascribed to a particular thing’
and regarded as inherent property. In this case, quality connotes distinguishing traits or characteristics and used
interchangeably with attributes. The study posited that a project manager must possess the following qualities if he
is to be effective: be proficient in his or her own discipline; have an appreciation of, and respect for all the involved
disciplines; be as equally interested in the management of the project including schedule and budget control;
possess excellent interpersonal skills; be committed to meeting the requirements of the hotel in terms of cost, time,
quality and functionality; and possess ability to appreciate the environmental, economic, cultural and social
concerns of the customers being served and the communities within which the hotel is operating.
These attributes had earlier been cited by Drucker (1972) as ingredients that an effective executive must possess.
Drucker (1972) was of the opinion that it is essential to know what effective executive do that others fail to do and
what they failed to do that others tend to do. The high point of the study was that effectiveness can be learned but
also that it must be learned. It was also affirmed that effective executives are far from common and that the
executive is first of all, expected to get the right things done. Even though high intelligence is common enough
among executives, intelligence, imagination, and knowledge are essential attributes, which aid effectiveness in
converting them to results. The argument in this study is succinct and points to the fact that highly effective chief
executives and managers should possess sterling qualities that distinguishes them from the crowd and forms a
yardstick for assessing managers.
Covey (2004) provides a platform for measuring the effectiveness of an Executive by identifying ‘The Seven
Habits of Highly Effective People” which are inclusive of being proactive, begin with the end in mind, putting
first things first, think win-win, seeking first to understand than to be understood, synergizing and sharpening the
saw in that order as shown in Figure 4. These habits are greatly influenced by knowledge, skill, and desire. This
paradigm according to Covey (2004) is timeless and the greater the change in the society and the more difficult
are the challenges which society faces, the more relevant the habits become.

166
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

Figure 4. The seven habits paradigm

Source: Covey (2004)

Conklin (2002)’s radical view of hotel organization process and Nebel and Ghei’s (2002) thoughts on the Hotel
General Manager (GM) brought into the fore the importance of the contribution which the GM, the Line Managers,
Facilities Manager, the Management and the Customers have to make to efficacious performance of facilities
management in hotel organizations. The GM is the arrowhead of the establishment. He occupies the driver’s seat
and sees the horizon. Apart from enviable training, experience and exposure, such a person must be proactive,
begin with the end in mind, put first things first, “think win-win” always, seek first to understand than to be
understood, synergize and sharpen the saw in that order according to Covey (2004).
The facilities manager must have the same peculiar characteristics with the GM to be able to drive the vision and
the mission of the organization and in particular facilities management department. The customers’ contributions
are their patronage, loyalty, criticisms, evaluation and feedback which are instrumental to strategic change. Then,
the incisive question an inquisitive observer of Nigerian Hotels would commonly ask is: Are the traits of the GMs
and FMs strong enough to drive facilities management principles and make it a huge success? This research is set
to assess the traits of these cogent drivers of facilities management principles in South-Western Nigerian hotels.
3. The Research Method
An exploratory cross-sectional survey approach was adopted in this study devoid of control and involving
one-time observation of the variables. This study covers the South-Western geo-political zone of Nigeria
consisting of six States namely Lagos, Ekiti, Ogun, Oyo, Osun and Ondo with their capital city as Ikeja,
Ado-Ekiti, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Oshogbo and Akure respectively as shown in Figure 5. The six States are
contiguous and possess similar attributes that allowed easy comparability, improved homogeneity of the
population and reduced the sampling errors.

167
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

The Six Political Zones of Nigeria (States and Capitals)

NORTH EAST NORTH WEST NORTH CENTRAL SOUTH EAST SOUTH WEST SOUTH SOUTH
ADAMAWA Yola JIGAWA Dutse BENUE Makurdi ABIA Umuahia EKITI Ado-Ekiti AKWA-IBOM Uyo
BAUCHI Bauchi KADUNA Kaduna NIGER Minna ANAMBRA Awka LAGOS Ikeja BAYELSA Yenagoa
BORNO Maiduguri KANO Kano KATSINA Katsina EBONYI Abakaliki OGUN Abeokuta CROSS RIVER Calabar
GOMBE Gombe KEBBI Birni Kebbi KOGI Lokoja ENUGU Enugu ONDO Akure DELTA Asaba
TARABA Jalingo SOKOTO Sokoto KWARA Ilorin IMO Owerri OSUN Oshogbo EDO Benin City
YOBE Damaturu ZAMFARA Gusau NASSARAWA Lafia PLATEAU Jos OYO Ibadan RIVERS PortHarcourt
Figure 5. The study area – South-Western Geo-Political Zone of Nigeria in thick line

There are one hundred and eighty-two hotels out of which Ekiti accounted for 35 (19%), Lagos 42 (23%), Ogun
39 (21%), Ondo 22 (12%), Osun 18 (10%) and Oyo 26 (14%) respectively. Out of the total of one hundred and
eighty-two hotels, a total of eighty hotels (44%) were located within the State capitals. The breakdown of the
hotels in the capitals indicated that Ado-Ekiti had 13 (16%), Ikeja 29 (36%), Abeokuta 11 (14%), Akure 8 (10%),
Oshogbo 3 (4%) and Ibadan 16 (20%). The State capitals were thus selected as a result of great concentration of
hotels and being the seats of governance and tourist destinations; while consideration was given to those that
meet the National Classification and Grading of Hotels Standard in consonance with the policy of Nigeria
Tourism Development Corporation (2001).
In determining the acceptable sample size, Kothari (1978)’s formula was adopted with confidence level set at
95% and a 0.02 probable error. By this method, the appropriate sample size of 57 was obtained and split based
on the number of hotels within each State. Data collection instrument consisted of self-administered
questionnaires which were administered on the hotel General Managers and Facilities
Managers/Engineers/Maintenance Managers complemented with in-depth personal interview and physical
survey of the constructed facilities. The questionnaires administered on the hotel General Managers/Facilities
Managers were divided into three major sections namely the general information about the hotel; the general
characteristics of the General Manager/Facilities Managers, and facilities management variables. Out of
fifty-seven questionnaires administered on hotel management, twenty-eight (49%) were returned.
In ensuring content validity of the questionnaires experts’ opinion in environmental sciences, behavioral sciences,
psychology, marketing and the hotel industry were sought on the relevance and appropriateness of the contents.
Similarly, test validation was carried out on the representative of respondents on whom the test was eventually
applied. In this regard, a superficial examination of the content of the instrument was carried out in order to
ensure face and content validity. This was attained by testing the reliability of the instrument using the split-half

168
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

method and a corrected coefficient of 0.76 was obtained which was considered high enough for the type of study
(Glass and Stanley, 1970; Kerlinger, 1973; and Ghisell and Brown, 1978).
The dynamism and the timelessness of Covey (2004)’s paradigm and its corroboration by Drucker (1972),
Odusami (2001) and Nebel and Ghei (2002) make it a ready tool of assessment for managers’ traits no matter the
level or the situation; hence its adoption for the assessment of the traits of facilities management key drivers in
hotel organizations in South-Western Nigerian Hotels. Data were analyzed using non-parametric statistical
techniques including descriptive statistics, ranking and Spearman’s correlation analysis. The Spearman’s
correlation co-efficient is given by the formula:
r =1- 2
6 d2
n(n - 1)

where
r = coefficient of rank correlation
d = rank difference and
n = number of items
The Spearman’s correlation co-efficient between a pair of data is denoted by r with property of
-1 ≤ r ≤ 1 by which if:
r = 1, there is perfect positive correlation
r = 0.5, there is upward correlation in positive sense
r = -1, there is negative correlation
r = 0 implies no correlation at all.
4. Result and Discussion
4.1 General Characteristics of the General Managers of Studied Hotels
Table 1 details the general characteristics of the General Managers of the participating hotels. Sixteen (16)
representing 57% of the respondents were Chairmen while 12 (43%) were Chairmen and Chief Executives. In
terms of role classifications 5 (18%) were owners of the business, 2 (7%) were joint owners of the business or
while 21 (75%) were employees. The high employee status for the General Manager cadre could be attributed to
the fact that hotel investors prefer to have managers with hotel and catering background to running the hotels
themselves. Out of 28 respondents, 15 representing 54% earn salary, 8 (29%) earn salary plus profit sharing, while
5 (18%) rely fully on profit sharing. In terms of age, the respondents’ age brackets range from 31 years to 65 years;
11 (39%) account for ages between 31 and 40; 10 (36%); 41 and fifty years 7 (25%) were between 51 and 65 years.
The high distribution of ages between 31 and 65 years might be due to the level of maturity and experience
attached to the hotel managerial positions.
Out of the 28 respondents, 17 (61%) were hotel and Catering Management practitioners; 10 (36%) were into
Business Administration; while only 1 (4%) was an Accountant. Only 1 (4%) of the respondents was a member of
Chartered Institute of Personnel Management of Nigeria, 3 (11%) belonged to the Nigeria Institute of Management;
18 (64%) were members of Nigeria Hotel and Catering Management Association (NHCMA); (21%) were
members of the Nigeria Group of International Facilities Management Association. The high number of General
Managers that belong to the NHCMA might be due to the desires of such people to consolidate their professional
qualifications and positions in the hotel industry.
Academically, 1 (4%) had Diploma Certificate; 1 (4%); Full City and Guilds of London; 14 (50%); B.A or B.Sc; 2
(8%); Master of Philosophy; while 1 (4%) held a Ph.D degree. The high number of degree holders as General
Managers might be due to the importance attached to academic qualifications.
Regarding professional qualification, out of 28 respondents, 2 (7%) were Honorary Members of various
professional associations; 3 (11%) were associate members; 5 (18%) were full-fledged professional members; 17
(61%) belonged to the Fellows cadre while 1 (4%) did not indicate any professional qualification. Considering
length of service in the hotel business, 20 (71%) have been in the hotel business for the past twenty-nine years; 4
(14%), nineteen years; while 4 (14%) have acquired more than ten years work experience in the industry. In terms
of overseas training, only 6 (21%) have attended overseas training; while 22 (79%) never had such training. The
reasons given for low overseas training were high cost of such training and high mobility of labor in the industry.
The tendency to engage professionally trained hotelier to manage the hotels runs contrary to Woods et al (2002)’s

169
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

findings that the GMs considered a strongly ‘business-focused’ curriculum to be most valuable for a person
aspiring to GM’s job. However, hotel stakeholders believed that engaging ‘hotelier’ trained as a manager is a good
starting point knowing fully well that on the job training, in-service training and experience will shape and shake
the orientation of such a person for better. Woods et al (2002) established a mean age of 46 for the majority of hotel
general managers. Thus, the hotels in Nigeria are not doing badly in this regard as their ages range from 31 to 50.

Table 1. General characteristics of the chief executive/gm of studied hotels

Characteristics Category Frequency/% of Respondents
Position in Organization Chairman 16(57)
Chairman & Chief Executive 12(43)
Total 28(100)
Role Classification Owner of the business & Entrepreneur 5(18)
Joint Owner & Entrepreneur 2(7)
Employee 21(75)
Total
Method of Remuneration Salary 15(54)
Salary Plus Profit sharing 8(29)
Profit Sharing 5(18)
Total 28(100)
Age(Average) < 30 0(0)
31 - 40 11(39)
41 - 50 10(36)
> 50 7(25)
Total 28(100)
Professional Calling Hotel & Catering Management 17(61)
Business Administration 10(36)
Accounting 1(4)
Engineering 0
No Formal Training 0
` Others 28(100)
Total
Professional Bodies Affiliated to ICAN 0(0)
CIPMN 1(4)
NIM 3(11)
NIQS 0(0)
NIOB 0(0)
NIA 0(0)
NHCMA 18(64)
IFMA(NG) 6(21)
Total 28(100)
Academic qualification Dipl. 1(4)
OND 0(0)
Full City & Guilds 1(4)
HND 0(0)

170
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

B.A/B.Sc. 14(50)
M.Sc 9(32)
M.Phil 2(7)
Ph.D 1(4)
Total 28(100)
Professional Qualifications Member 8(29)
Fellow 17(61)
Nil 3(11)
Total 28(100)
Years involved in hotel business 1 - 10 4(14)
11 - 20 4(14)
21 - 30 20(71)
31 - 40 0(0)
> 40 28(100)
Overseas Training Yes 6(21)
No 22(79)
Total 28(100)
Note: Institute of Chartered Accountant of Nigeria = ICAN, Chartered Institute of Personnel Management of
Nigeria = CIPMN, Nigerian Institute of Management = NIM, Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors = NIQS,
Nigerian Institute of Building = NIOB, Nigerian Institute of Architect = NIA, Nigerian Hotel and Catering
Management Association = NHCMA, International Facilities Management Association (Nigeria Group) =
IFMA(NG).

4.2 General Characteristics of the Facilities Managers/ Maintenance Engineers of Studied Hotels
Table 2 shows the general characteristics of the Facilities Managers engaged by the investigated hotels. In terms of
designations, out of 28 respondents 9 (32%) were designated as Directors; 16 (57%) as Engineers, while only 3
(11%) were designated as Facilities Managers. The high frequency of the respondents designated as engineers
might be due to the emphasis placed on Engineering Department being handled by qualified Engineers while low
designation as Facilities Managers might be due to low response to facilities management principles in the sector
of the economy.
In terms of age, the respondents’ age range from thirty to forty years, with 17 (61%) ageing between twenty-one
and thirty years, while 11 (39%) age between thirty-one and forty years. The reason adduced for low age range was
due to the desire to engage relatively young engineers amenable to control and paid low wage. In respect of
professional status, 16 representing 57% were Electrical Engineers; 10 (36%) were Mechanical Engineers; 1 (4%)
was Civil Engineer while 1 (4%) did not indicate professional status. From these analyses, majority of the
respondents were Electrical Engineers probably due to the belief that majority of hotel facility problems are
electrical in nature.
Sixteen out of twenty-eight respondents representing 36% were affiliated to the Nigerian Society of Engineers
(NSE); 2 (7%) to the Nigerian Institute of Building; 2 (7%), Nigeria Group of the International Facilities
Management Association; 8 (29%) did not indicate subscription to any professional body. However, in terms of
professional qualifications, 4 (14%) were Honorary Members of their professional body; 3 (11%), Associates
Members while 21 (75%) were Professional Members. In terms of academic qualifications, 3 representing 11% of
the respondents had Ordinary Diploma Certificate; 2 (7%) had Full City and Guilds Certificate of London; 19
(68%) had B.A/B.Sc Degree; while 4 (14%) had M.Sc Degree. Considering the respondents’ work experience, 26
(93%) had acquired 1 to 10 years’ experience; 2 (7%) have had 11 to 19 years; however, only 5 (18%) with
majority not having such training.

171
www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

Table 2. General characteristics of the facilities manager/engineers of studied hotels hotels

Characteristics Category Frequency/% of Respondents
Designation Director 2(7)
Facilities Manager 2(7)
Maintenance Manager 3(11)
Chief Engineer 0(0)
Engineer 16(57)
Maintenance Officer 5(18)
Maintenance Supervisor 0(0)
Total 28(100)
Age(Average) 21 - 30 17(61)
31 - 40 11(39)
41 - 50 0(0)
> 50 0(0)
Total 28(100)

Professional Calling Mechanical 10(36)

Electrical 16(57)
Building 0(0)
Civil Engineering 1(4)
Facilities Management 0(0)
Estate Management 0(0)
Others 1(4)
No Training 0(0)
Total
Professional Bodies Affiliated to NSE 10(36)
NIOB 2(7)
NIFMA 2(7)
NIESV 0(0)
Nil 14(50)
Total 28(100)
Academic qualification Dipl. 0(0)
OND 3(11)
Full City & Guilds 2(7)
HND 0(0)
B.A/B.Sc. 19(68)
M.Sc 0(0)
M.Phil 4(14)
Total 28(100)
Professional Qualifications Fellow 0(0)
Member 12(43)
Graduate/Probationers 16(57)
Nil 0(0)

172
 www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

Total 28(100)
Working Experience 1 - 10 26(93)
11 – 20 2(7)
21 – 30 0(0)
31 – 40 0(0)
41 & above 0(0)
Total 28(100)
Overseas Training Yes 5(18)
No 23(82)
Total 28(100)
Note: Nigeria Society of Engineers = NSE; Nigerian Institute of Building = NIOB; International Facilities
Management Association (Nigeria Group) = IFMA(NG); Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers =
NIESV

4.3 Traits of the Studied Hotels’ Chief Executive/General Managers

Table 3 column 2 below shows Covey (2004)’s identified traits that an effective manager or a chief executive must
possess. The Executives /General Managers of the investigated hotels were asked to assess themselves based on
these traits in order of importance. These assessments were then compared in relation to Covey’s proposition using
the Spearman Rank Correlation analysis. Overall for the investigated hotels, a figure of 0.45 was arrived at for
overall ranking which shows that the General Managers generally were below standard in terms of Covey’s model.
However, some of these General Managers were up to expectations and such include the General Managers for the
hotels listed as 2, 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 19, 22, and 24 respectively in Table 3. Out of these twelve hotels only
eight belonged to the schedule of effective hotels. That implies that only five of the eleven effective hotels have
General Managers that could be regarded as effective in the positive sense and that gives 45.45%. The standard
error of Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation gave 0.15. The smaller the standard error, the greater the
uniformity of the sampling distribution, hence, the greater the reliability of sample. It could be concluded that the
finding holds true generally for all the hotels within the study area. This result shows that hotels’ operating Chief
Executives were below average managerially going by Covey’s model. The implication of this shortcoming is
better appreciated in the light of Nebel and Ghei (2002)’s assertion as reflected in the literature.
This also implies that lack of proactive managers or chief executive would have serious repercussions on the
implementation of strategic thinking within the organization generally and facilities management in particular.

Table 3. Distribution of trait parameters for the general managers

Covey’s Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl
S/N Par 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
i 1 6 4 3 2 3 2 2 1 4 2 8 4 6 5
ii 2 5 5 5 3 5 1 5 3 3 3 7 5 5 2
iii 3 7 1 2 1 4 3 4 6 2 1 6 3 4 1
Iv 4 4 2 4 7 6 4 3 10 1 6 5 2 3 6
V 5 8 10 6 8 10 6 6 2 9 5 9 10 2 3
Vi 6 3 3 7 9 1 5 10 4 10 4 4 9 1 4
Vii 7 2 7 10 10 2 8 9 5 8 10 10 8 10 10
Viii 8 1 6 1 6 7 7 8 7 7 9 2 7 9 8
Ix 9 9 8 8 5 8 9 1 8 6 8 1 1 8 9
X 10 10 9 9 4 9 10 7 9 5 7 3 6 7 7
R 0.14 0.6 0.54 0.41 0.42 0.96 0.36 0.60 0.47 0.79 -0.59 0.16 0.45 0.7
 
 
 
 

173
 www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

Key
Covey's Parameter Hierarchically Arranged
1 Being Proactive
2 Begin with the end in mind
3 Put first thins first
4 Think win - win
5 Seeking first to understand than to be understood
6 Synergizing always
7 Seeking to improve yourself always through education and training
8 High intellectual ability
9 Affinity for teamwork
10 Enthusiastic about your working environment and related financial and legal matters.
Hotl = Hotel
Par = Parameter
r = Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation

Table 3. Contd.
Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl O/All
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Rankg
5 1 3 1 7 9 3 4 3 6 2 9 3 4 9
6 3 2 3 8 3 4 3 4 7 9 10 9 6 7
7 5 1 9 9 10 6 1 6 8 1 8 2 2 8
8 7 5 8 10 1 5 2 5 5 8 1 1 5 7
9 10 6 10 6 2 8 7 7 9 7 7 10 8 2
10 6 9 2 1 5 7 6 8 4 6 2 4 7 4
4 9 10 4 3 4 9 8 9 10 10 3 5 10 1
1 8 8 5 2 8 1 9 1 3 3 4 7 1 5
2 2 7 6 4 6 2 5 2 2 2 4 5 6 6
5 4 4 7 5 7 10 10 10 1 1 5 6 8 3
-0.53 0.22 0.59 0.21 -0.65 0.04 0.21 0.76 0.22 -0.58 0.04 -0.49 0.33 0.20 0.45

Key
Mainland Excellence Greenspring
Hotel 1 Hotel Hotel 11 Hotel Hotel 21 Hotel
Kilo MicCom Golf
Hotel 2 Federal Palace Hotel Hotel 12 Hotel Hotel 22 hotel
Lagos Sheraton Oasis D'Erovan
Hotel 3 Hotel Hotel 13 Hotel Hotel 23 Hotel
West End
Hotel 4 Hotel Hotel 14 Hotel Newcastle Hotel 24 Kankanfo Hotel
Adesba
Hotel 5 Olujoda Hotel Hotel 15 Bluenet Hotel Hotel 25 Hotel
Hotel 6 Owena Motel Hotel 16 Lagos Airport Hotel Hotel 26 K.S Motel
Dusmar
Hotel 7 Niger Palace Hotel Hotel 17 Lafia Hotel Hotel 27 Hotel
Gateway Leisure Spring
Hotel 8 Hotel Hotel 18 Heritage Hotel Hotel 28 Hotel
Hotel 9 Hotel Plaza Hotel 19 Premier Hotel
L'Eko
Hotel 10 meridien Hotel 20 Universal Hotel r = Spearman Correlation
Co - efficient. 0.5 and above is
Hotl = Hotel O/All = Overall taken to mean perfect correlation.
Rankg = Ranking Pr implies Parameter

174
 www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

4.4 Traits of the Studied Hotels’ Facilities Managers/Maintenance Managers

Table 4 below shows the trait disposition data for the Facilities/Maintenance Managers in the investigated hotels
using Covey’s traits model for effective manager. Overall for the investigated hotels, Spearmans Correlation is
0.23 which means there is no perfect correlation with Covey’s trait expectation. However, ten hotels have perfect
correlation while six hotels have negative perfect correlation. Out of the sixteen hotels, seven that is Lagos
Sheraton, Gateway Hotel, L’Eko Meridien, Excellence Hotel, Lagos Airport Hotel, Premier Hotel and MicCom
Golf Hotel falls into the effective hotel category. Nonetheless, Premier Hotel displayed perfect correlation in
negative sense. The standard error of Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation gave 0.18. The smaller the standard
error, the greater the uniformity of the sampling distribution and hence the greater the reliability of sample; it can
therefore be concluded that the same finding holds generally for all the hotels within the study area. This finding
correlates perfectly with the finding from the earlier analysis on the GMs except that the number of proactive
Maintenance Engineer or Managers in effective hotel increased to 7 out of 11 hotels; that is 64% which is above
average. This is so because, as established earlier, many of the respondents are graduates with engineering
background. However, it is contrary to Rutherford’s disposition that responsibility for communication with
employees, leadership, safety and effective organizational ability suggest that the modern hotel engineers deemed
activities relating to management of their departments to be of high importance to success. Thus, one of the
foremost issues facing the Chief Engineer today encompasses those that refer to managerial skills rather than the
traditional view that the Chief Engineers are more concerned with the technical aspects of their jobs.

Table 4. Distribution of trait parameters for the facilities managers

Covey’s Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl
S/N Par 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
i 1 5 6 10 10 5 4 3 2 6 3 6 1 5 7
ii 2 6 5 9 7 4 5 4 4 8 5 5 2 7 2
iii 3 2 1 8 8 6 6 2 3 7 4 3 3 8 1
Iv 4 9 2 7 9 7 7 5 5 9 1 4 4 9 6
V 5 10 4 2 4 10 9 1 7 10 10 2 5 6 3
Vi 6 7 3 6 5 9 8 6 6 1 2 1 6 10 10
Vii 7 8 10 1 6 8 10 10 9 2 7 10 10 3 9
Viii 8 4 8 5 2 1 2 7 1 5 8 7 9 4 4
Ix 9 1 7 3 3 2 1 9 8 3 6 9 8 1 5
X 10 3 9 4 1 3 3 8 10 4 9 8 7 2 8
R -0.3 0.6 0.76 -0.89 -0.33 -0.3 0.76 -0.61 -0.56 0.55 0.5 0.87 -0.62 0.37

Key
Covey's Parameter Hierarchically Arranged
1 Being Proactive
2 Begin with the end in mind
3 Put first thins first
4 Think win - win
5 Seeking first to understand than to be understood
6 Synergizing always
7 Seeking to improve yourself always through education and training
8 High intellectual ability
9 Affinity for teamwork
10 Enthusiastic about your working environment and related financial and legal matters.
Hotl = Hotel
Par = Parameter
r = Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation

175
 www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

Table 4. Contd.
Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl Hotl O/All
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Rankg
5 5 4 1 6 4 4 2 8 2 8 4 2 10 7
6 3 5 2 7 9 3 5 10 5 10 17 4 3 5
7 2 6 3 10 11 2 4 9 7 9 3 7 7 7
8 4 9 7 9 2 1 3 3 8 3 2 9 8 3
9 16 8 18 8 10 8 1 4 9 4 8 10 2 2
10 1 7 9 5 3 9 6 2 6 2 1 8 9 4
4 9 110 10 4 6 10 7 5 10 15 9 6 11 1
3 10 1 6 1 7 7 8 6 3 6 5 1 6 8
2 8 2 5 2 5 6 10 1 4 1 6 5 5 9
1 7 3 4 3 8 15 19 17 1 7 10 3 4 6
-0.58 0.62 -0.32 0.44 -0.76 0.26 0.5 0.82 -0.5 -0.20 -0.50 0.43 -0.15 -0.36 0.23

Key
Mainland Excellence Greenspring
Hotel 1 Hotel Hotel 11 Hotel Hotel 21 Hotel
Kilo MicCom Golf
Hotel 2 Federal Palace Hotel Hotel 12 Hotel Hotel 22 hotel
Lagos Sheraton Oasis D'Erovan
Hotel 3 Hotel Hotel 13 Hotel Hotel 23 Hotel
West End
Hotel 4 Hotel Hotel 14 Hotel Newcastle Hotel 24 Kankanfo Hotel
Adesba
Hotel 5 Olujoda Hotel Hotel 15 Bluenet Hotel Hotel 25 Hotel
Hotel 6 Owena Motel Hotel 16 Lagos Airport Hotel Hotel 26 K.S Motel
Dusmar
Hotel 7 Niger Palace Hotel Hotel 17 Lafia Hotel Hotel 27 Hotel
Gateway Leisure Spring
Hotel 8 Hotel Hotel 18 Heritage Hotel Hotel 28 Hotel
Hotel 9 Hotel Plaza Hotel 19 Premier Hotel
L'Eko
Hotel 10 meridien Hotel 20 Universal Hotel r = Spearman Correlation
Co - efficient. 0.5 and above is
Hotl = Hotel O/All = Overall taken to mean perfect correlation.
Rankg = Ranking Pr implies Parameter

5. Conclusion and Recommendations

The GMs background, training and features in South-Western Nigerian hotels cannot be said to be poor or low in
that they compared favorably with the standard in advanced countries, particularly United State of America;
however, they lack international exposure. In terms of traits, using Covey’s proposition as benchmark, the GMs
are below average managerially, lacking the dynamism and the pizzazz that are required to propel them along.
Lack of proactive managers would have serious repercussions on the implementation of facilities management as
instrument of strategic and sustainable development.
The same traits were exhibited by the Facilities Managers/Maintenance Managers/Chief Engineers and being the
ones directly involved in facilities management implementation strategy implies that the objectives of the
facilities management may be extremely hampered from being achieved. In essence, the exposure of the GMS
and the FMs must be deliberately improved upon while the duo must, as a matter of urgency, cultivate the habit
of learning how to be effective in accordance with Drucker (1972)’s proposition and Covey (2004)’s suggestion.
References
Adewunmi, Y., & Ogunba, O. (2006). Shaping a Sustainable Role for Estate Surveyors and Valuers in the
Evolution of Facilities Management in Nigeria. International Conference on the Built Environment,

176
 www.ccsenet.org/jms Journal of Management and Sustainability Vol. 2, No. 2; 2012

Innovation Policy and Sustainable Development Covenant University Ota, Nigeria, 322 – 327.
Arditi, D., & Nawakorawit, M. (1999). Issues in Building Maintenance: Property Managers’ Perspective. Journal
of Architectural Engineering, December, 117-132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1999)5:4(117)
Asika, N. (1991). Research Methodology in the Behavioral Sciences (1st ed.). Lagos: Longman Nigeria Plc.
Conklin, M. (2002). As I See It: Hotel Organization Structure. In Rutherford, D. G. (Ed.), Hotel Management and
Operations (3rd ed.) (pp 53-54). New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Covey, S. (2004). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (1st ed.). London: Simon and Schuster Uk Ltd.
Drucker, P. (1972). The Effective Executive (3rd ed.). London: William Heinemann Ltd.
Durodola, O. D., & Oloyede, S. A. (2011). Empirical Determination of Property Assets Management Styles in
South-Western Nigeria Hotels. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(1), 151-159.
Durodola, O. D., Ajayi, C. A., & Oloyede, S. A. (2011). Impact of Property Assets’ Management Styles on
Effective Service Delivery in South-Western Nigeria Hotels. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(4),
151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v4n4p116
Eddystone, C., & Nebel, III. (2002). Organization Design. In Rutherford, D. G. (Ed.), Hotel Management and
Operations (3rd ed.) (pp. 41-52). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ghiselli, E. E., & Brown, C. W. (1978). Personnel and Industrial Psychology (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Glass, G. V., & Stanley, J. C. (1970). Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology (2nd ed.). New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall.
Hassanain, M. A, Froese, T. M, Asce, M., & Vanier, D. J. (2003). Framework Model for Asset Maintenance
Management. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, February, 51 – 64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:1(51)
Hayes, D. K., & Ninemeier, J. D. (2007). Hotel Operations Management (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prince
Hall.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kothari, C. R. (1978). Quantitative Techniques (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House PVT Ltd.
Mintzberg, H. (1075). The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Facts. Harvard Business Review, July – August, 49 – 61.
Nebel, E. C., & Ghei, A. (2002). A Conceptual Framework of the Hotel General Manager’s Job. In Rutherford, D.
G. (Ed.), Hotel Management and Operations (3rd ed.) (pp. 55 – 63). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation (NTDC). (2001). Standard for National Classification and Grading
of Hotels and Other Serviced Accommodations in Nigeria (1st ed.). Abuja: Nigerian Tourism Development
Corporation.
Odusami, K. (2001). Project Team Leadership and Construction Project Performance in Some Selected States of
Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis of the Department of Building, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos.
Opaluwah, S. A. (2005). Principles and Practice of Facilities Management in Nigeria. Abuja: Still Waters
Publications.
Owen, D. (1995). FM is not Just a Radio Station. Chartered Surveyor Monthly, Supplement, June, II – IV.
Rutherford, D. G. (2002). As I See It: Organization Structure. In Rutherford, D. G. (Ed.), Hotel Management and
Operations (3rd ed.) (pp. 55-63). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Smith, S. (2003). Defining Facilities. In Rick, B., Langston, G., & Gerard de V. (Eds.), Workplace Strategies and
Facilities Managements (1st ed.) (pp. 11-27). Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann Publications.
Torkildsen, G. (1992). Leisure Recreation Management (3rd ed.). London: E & FN Spon.
Woods, R.H., Rutherford, D.G., Schmidgall & Sciarini. (2002). Hotel General Managers: Focussed on the Core
Business. In Rutherford, D. G. (Ed.), Hotel Management and Operations (3rd ed.) (pp. 55-63). New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

177

View publication stats