Exam Malpractice Assignment
Exam Malpractice Assignment
ASSIGNMENT
BY:
GROUP 5
GROUP MEMBERS:
September, 2019
INTRODUCTION
The whole mark of teaching/instruction in the classroom is examination, where the expected
behavioral change is to be displayed through writing and passing examination. Writing and passing
examination in Nigeria is becoming a do or dies affair to some families who can go to any extent to
ensure success of their children.
Thus the concern for tertiary levels of Education, responsible parents, Governments, Agencies
concerned with Education. The main factor that makes some parents, guardians and students to see
that their children pass examination at all cost is the strong emphasis given to Certification in the
Nigerian National life. This is prompting reason for hustling by all to succeed in life.
WHAT IS EXAMINATION?
The oxford advanced learners dictionary (2000) defined exam as spoken or practical test at school
or college especially an important one that you need to do in order to get a qualification. The
Wikipedia further asserted that a test or examination is an assessment intended to measure a test-
takers knowledge or skill, aptitude, physical fitness or classification in many other topics (e.g.
beliefs). A test may be administered orally, on a paper, on a computer or in confirmed area that
requires a test taker to physically perform a set of skills.
WHAT IS EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE?
Malpractice is defined as any deliberate act of wrong doing, contrary to the rules of examinations
designed to give a candidate an unfair advantage or able frequently, to place a candidate at a
disadvantage. Malpractice therefore introduces equities into the examination system. In some
examinations, the level of malpractice is so high that it seriously undermines the credibility of the
examination system.
FORMS OF EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE
The following are some identified forms of examinations malpractice:
i. Leakage: This means that the content of examination or part of it is disclosed prior to
taking the examination. Usually it involves one or more of the following: staff members of
the examination authorities, printers, proof readers, and messengers, personal to develop the
papers (setters) or to determine its suitability (moderators) and school administrators.
ii. Impersonation: An individual who is not registered as a candidate takes the place of one
that is registered. Usually this involves collusion between the chief examiner and the
examination supervisor. It frequently involves tertiary institutions students taking the test
for monetary reward or a favour for a girl friend or boy friend. Sometimes young employees
are coerced to take the examination in place of the rightful examinee.
iii. External Assistance: Individuals who are not examination candidates giving unauthorized
assistance to candidates. Usually this involves invigilators (exam room supervisors)
dictating answers, writing answers on the black boards, calculating sheets of worked out
answers during the course of the examinations or acting as couriers of materials into the
examination center. In some instance entering helpers here used phones or broadcast
answers.
iv. Smuggling of foreign materials: This is perhaps the most common form of malpractice. It
relates to the introduction of unauthorized materials (e.g. note books, crib notes, charts and
answers) into the examination hall. Material is frequently smuggled in pants, shoes, hems
and bras or information is written on parts of the body.
v. Copying: Reproduction of another candidate work with or without permissions.
vi. Collusion: Unauthorized passing of information between candidates usually by exchanging
notes or scripts. Usually involves only the candidate but can be facilitated by inadequate
spacing between desks and laxed supervision.
vii. Intimidation: Examinations official including supervisors and makers of papers are
physically threatened. Usually involves people seeking support for individual candidates.
Candidates here also placed weapons in clear view of supervisors to intimidate them.
Substitution of scripts, replacing answer sheets handed out during the course of
examination. Usually involves examination office officials, invigilators and some teachers
working outside the examination room.
viii. Improper Assignment: Deliberate placing of candidate in centers under the supervising of
corrupt officials. This is perpetrated by examination officers and examination officials of
ministries of Education and representatives of examination bodies.
ix. Ghost Centers: Fictitious examination centers. This is established by corrupt examination
officials where candidates can complete the examination with the support of helpers and
without supervision.
x. Makers Malpractice: Deliberate alteration of marks designed to inflate or deflate a
candidate’s original mark. This can be initiated by examination officials, by candidates
(making contract with the makers) or making contracts with the candidates.
xi. Awards and Certification: Deliberate alteration of. In the past usually confined to
examinations officials but in more recent years include printers and candidates with high
level of skills in technology.
CAUSES OF EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE
The idea that, in the Nigerian Education certificate is most important than the skills to deliver is
what prompted most students into malpractice so as to have the required certificate to be there.
Therefore, the following could be advanced as reasons why we have examination malpractice in
our educational system:
a. High Stakes of Examinations: Success in an examination can have profound,
immediate and long term impact on a candidate’s life. In many developing countries like
Nigeria, examination success and secondary school graduation represents the whole
avenue for poor students to secure a non menial job. Many parents are seen to resort to
various corrupt practices to ensure that their children “PASS” the public examination.
b. Teacher and School Status: In many instance, teachers and school reputations depends
on the success of students in public examinations, this is particularly true where official
or un-official school position in external examinations are published. There is also the
problem of prizes awarded to wining schools or individual subject teachers which
triggers malpractice from both school administrators and teachers.
c. Personality Disposition: Some students are more prone to cheating than others,
because they are either lazy or dubious.
d. Desire of some parents to place their children: Some parents would blindly want their
children to get into lucrative courses like medicine, accountancy, etc. as such would
collide with any person who can at all cost get their children the required credits.
e. Inadequate school facilities and Teachers: Textbooks shortages, inadequate teacher
training, teacher absence from work, teacher lacking subject matter competency, strikes
and frequent schools closure are common features of education in developing countries
like ours. Parents and students may perceive conditions of learning to be so inadequate
that they have little option than the resort to unfair means to increase the likelihood that
the student will pass the examination.
f. Inadequacies of the Examinations: Where the standard aimed at is too high or
obscure, teachers and students may lose confidence in their abilities to master the
material. In such instance, students may resort to smuggling materials such as textbooks
and notes in the examinations room.
g. Location of Examination centers: Remote centers tend to receive materials in
advance, thus increasing the opportunity of gaining access to examination papers. Due
to distance or remoteness of the centers, proper supervision cannot be done as such any
corrupt practice can be committed.
h. Low Salary Levels: Salary levels of teachers, examination officials and examination
supervisors are frequently below the poverty line. In such instance bribes from parents
may probe irrestible.
i. Respect for Certificate: The society regards possession of certificate as Alfa and
Omega where an individual is only recognized if he possesses a certain certificate built
professional’s skills are not recognized.
j. Threats and Intimidation from Parents: Parents especially of wards from private
schools and specialized schools, threaten proprietors of withdrawal of children or
closure of schools in their children do not make excellent results
EFFECTS OF EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE
The Consequences of Examination
The consequences of examination malpractice both to education and the society will be
catastrophic in the long run candidates/ students who would ordinarily be working hard to
pass examination will now depend on quack arrangement, since such arrangements rarely
failed.
Then the fraud or malpractice may eventually be seen as a way of academic exercise. The
candidates produced in this manner will grow into adults and teachers or examinations
officials who will not see anything wrong with such sophisticated and high class
examination fraud thus defeating the goals of education by turning out certificated
illiterates.
Examination malpractice increases lack of confidence among students.
Students who would have ordinarily passed an examination feel disappointed and loss of
confidence when less intelligent ones perform better than then through cheating, thus
leading to loss of confidence in themselves and in the examination and the system at large.
Examinations malpractice may lure some students into others areas of misconducts such as
prostitutions and or armed robbery, female students who lack money to fund external
assistance or pay for scores may take prostitution while male may as well take stealing or
armed robbery in a bid to make money to pay for scores.
Other general effects of examinations malpractice can be summarized as follows:
The products of examinations malpractice are square pegs in round holes.
They lack the required knowledge and experience to carry out their assignment and
professional duties effectively.
Examinations malpractice produces candidates with low moral and academic values.
The products of examination malpractice always end up with unfulfilled dreams in their
chosen career
Examinations malpractice is a negative orientation for future leaders who may end up being
fraudulent and corrupt in their various offices.
Anyone who engages in examinations malpractice is building on a false foundation which
can lead to serious professional errors.
CONCLUSION
Examination malpractice is an act or irregular manner of testing examiners contravenes the rules
and conventions guiding the conduct of examinations. The causes could be attributed to the
behaviour of examiners, parents and system. The consequences could be catastrophic to both
education system would turn out the society certificated illiterates.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Sound educational policy should be put in place with de-emphasis on the supremacy of
certificates over skills and professional competence.
2. Appointment of supervisors of proven integrity and who are independent of the
examinations centers.
3. The remuneration of invigilators and supervisors should be attractable that would not allow
one to think of taking bribe to add to his earnings.
4. Ensure that only formally registered candidates sit for the examination.
5. Religious and community leaders should be used to intervene on parents who insist on their
children getting the best result without genuine efforts for it.
6. Prohibit the use of electronic devices including cellular phones and IPADS
7. School teachers should be motivated and remunerated adequately and learning environment
made friendly so that they can do their work satisfactorily and cover the syllabus before
examinations.
8. There should frequent unannounced visits by officials of examination centers and erring
centers should be punished.
9. The rigidity and timing of examinations should be reviewed in a such a way that when a
student complained genuinely that he cannot write an examination another time suitable
should be organized for him, this will eliminate the phobia of failure which may result in
malpractice.
References
Akanni, O. O., & Odofin, B. (2015). Reducing Examination Malpractices in Nigerian Schools
through Effective Continuous Assessment (C. A.) Techniques as an Alternative to One
Shot Examination In Osun State, Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research,
2(1): 91 – 101
Akaranga, S. I., & Ongong, J. J. (2013). The phenomenon of Examination Malpractice: An
Example of Nairobi and Kenyatta Universities. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18):
87 – 96
Anzene, S. J. (2014). Trends in Examination Malpractice in Nigerian Educational System and its
Effects on the Socio-Economic Development of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Humanities
and Social Sciences, 2(3): 1 – 8
Emaikwu, S. O. (2012). Assessing the Impact of Examination Malpractices on the Measurement
of Ability in Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(4): 748 –
757
George, I. N., & Ukpong, D. E. (2013). Contemporary Social Problems in Nigeria and its Impact
on National Development: Implication for Guidance and Counselling Services. Journal
of Educational and Social Research, 3(2): 167 – 173
Jimoh, B. O. (2009). Examination Malpractice in Secondary Schools in Nigeria: What sustains
it? European Journal of Educational Studies,1(3): 101 – 108
Nnam, M. U., & Inah, A. F. (2015). Empirical Investigation into the Causes, Forms and
Consequences of Examination Malpractice in Nigerian Institutions of Higher Learning.
International Journal of Novel
Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 2(1): 52 – 62
Ojonemi, P. S., Enejoh, W., Enejoh, A., & Olatunmibi, O. (2013). Examination Malpractice:
Challenges to Human Resource Development in Nigeria. International Journal of
Capacity Building in Education
and Management, 2(1): 91 – 101
Onuka, A., & Amoo, S. A. (n.d). Examination Malpractice and Act 33 of 1999. Retrieved from
www.naere.org.ng/journal/examination_malpractice_act_33_1999.pdf
Onuka, A. O. U., &Durowoju, E. O. (2013). Stakeholders’ Role in Curbing Examination
Malpractice in Nigeria. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social
Sciences, 2(6): 342 – 348
Oredein, A. O. (2006). Checking Examination Malpractice in Nigerian Schools. Retrieved from
www.naere.org.ng/journal/checking_Examination_malpractice_nigerian_schools.pdf
Petters, J. S., & Okon, M. O. (2013). Students’ Perception of Causes and Effects of Examination
Malpractice in the Nigerian Educational System: The Way Forward for Quality Education.
Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281305310X
The CWO Voice (06/04/2010). Exam Malpractice: Implication for National
Development. Retrieved from http://news2.onlinenigeria.com/news/General/5692-exam
malpractice-implication-for nationaldevelopment. html
Udoh, N. A. (2011). Remote Causes and Counselling Implications of Examination Malpractice
in Nigeria. Student Pulse, 3(10). Retrieved from http://www.studentpulse.com/a?id=585
Uzoigwe, G. O. (n.d). Corruption in Education and Assessment Systems: The WAEC
Experience in Nigeria. Retrieved from www.iaea.info/documents/paper_1162d1b538.pdf