Summary of Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (Republic Act No. 9995, 27 July 2009)
The Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 was passed in response to a highly publicized sex scandal involving celebrity physician Hayden Kho. The law prohibits recording or taking photos of sexual acts or private areas without consent. It also bans distributing, publishing, or broadcasting such recordings even if consent was given for the initial recording. Violators face 3-7 years in prison and fines from 100,000 to 500,000 pesos. Additional penalties target juridical persons, public officers, and alien violators. The law aims to prevent non-consensual recordings and distributions that violate privacy.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views3 pages
Summary of Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (Republic Act No. 9995, 27 July 2009)
The Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 was passed in response to a highly publicized sex scandal involving celebrity physician Hayden Kho. The law prohibits recording or taking photos of sexual acts or private areas without consent. It also bans distributing, publishing, or broadcasting such recordings even if consent was given for the initial recording. Violators face 3-7 years in prison and fines from 100,000 to 500,000 pesos. Additional penalties target juridical persons, public officers, and alien violators. The law aims to prevent non-consensual recordings and distributions that violate privacy.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
SPECIAL PROJECT ON PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS (PFR) SUBJECT
1st Year 1st Semester
Student : Guerrero, Grandeur P.G.
Freshman, Juris Doctor Professor : Hon. Judge Eugene C. Paras
Summary of Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009
(Republic Act No. 9995, 27 July 2009)
The highly publicized sex videos of celebrity physician
Hayden Kho with various celebrity partners rocked Philippine society in May 2009 and was quickly shared online and later distributed through DVD in the streets and sidewalks. In response to this, Congress passed Republic Act 9995 (Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009) to prevent the publication and distribution of similar material in the future.[1] The law prohibits recording videos or taking photos of a sexual act, the male or female genitalia, and of the female breast, among others, without consent of the persons featured in the material. The law ultimately seeks to prevent the reproduction, distribution, and publication of said material regardless of whether or not the persons featured consented to the recording.
Definition of Terms:
"Broadcast" - means to make public, by any means, a
visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons.
"Capture" - with respect to an image, means to videotape,
photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast.
"Female breast" - means any portion of the female breast.
"Photo or video voyeurism" - means the act of taking photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing sexual act or any similar activity or of capturing an image of the private area of a person or persons without the latter's consent, under circumstances in which such person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy, or the act of selling, copying, reproducing, broadcasting, sharing, showing or exhibiting the photo or video coverage or recordings of such sexual act or similar activity through VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and similar means or device without the written consent of the person/s involved, notwithstanding that consent to record or take photo or video coverage of same was given by such person's.
"Private area of a person" - means the naked or
undergarment clad genitals, public area, buttocks or female breast of an individual.
"Under circumstances in which a person has a
reasonable expectation of privacy" - means believe that he/she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image or a private area of the person was being captured; or circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that a private area of the person would not be visible to the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or private place.
Prohibited Acts
The Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act prohibits
the following acts:
1. The unconsented taking of a photo or video of a
person or group of persons engaged in a sexual act or any similar activity, or capturing an image of the private area of a person, under circumstances in which the said person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; 2. The copying or reproduction of such photo or video recording of the sexual act; 3. The selling or distribution of such photo or video recording; 4. The publication or broadcasting, whether in print or broadcast media, or the showing of such sexual act or any similar activity through VCD/DVD, the internet, cellular phones, and other similar means or devices without the written consent of the persons featured. 5. Prohibitions numbered 2, 3, and 4 will still apply even if the person or persons featured in the photo or video consented to the taking of the photo or recording of the sexual act.
Penalties
The penalties for any person found guilty of violating any of
the prohibitions enumerated under Section 4 of R.A. 9995 range from an imprisonment of 3 to 7 years and a fine of P100,000.00 up to P500,000.00 at the discretion of the court. Additional penalties are meted for the following violators: juridical persons, public officers or employees, and aliens.
Juridical Persons such as Corporations and Partnerships who
violate this law will have their licenses or franchises automatically revoked and their officers held liable, including the editor and reporter in the case of print media, and the station manager, editor, and broadcaster in the case of broadcast media. Public officers or employees who violate this law shall also be held administratively liable, whereas aliens who violate the law shall be subject to deportation proceedings after they serve their sentence and pay the fines imposed.
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject in The Matter of The Petitions For Admission To The Bar of Unsuccessful Candidates of 1946 To 1953 ALBINO CUNANAN, ET AL., Petitioners (Resolution 18 March 1954)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject IN RE: PETITION OF ARTURO EFREN GARCIA For Admission To The Philippine Bar Without Taking The Examination. ARTURO EFREN GARCIA, Petitioner (15 August 1961)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject RE: APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE PHILIPPINE BAR, vs. VICENTE D. CHING, Applicant (BAR MATTER No. 914, 01 October 1999)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject SOPHIA ALAWI, Complainant, vs. ASHARY M. ALAUYA, Clerk of Court VI, Shari'a District Court, Marawi City, Respondent (A.M. SDC-97-2-P 24, February 1997)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject JESUS MA. CUI, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ANTONIO MA. CUI, Defendant-Appellant, ROMULO CUI, Intervenor-Appellant (G.R. No. L-18727, 31 August 1964)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject in The Matter of The IBP Membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. MARCIAL A. EDILION (IBP Administrative Case No. MDD-1) (A.M. No. 1928 August 3, 1978)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject in The Matter of The IBP Membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. MARCIAL A. EDILLION (IBP Administrative Case No. MDD-1), Petitioner (A.C. 1928, 19 December 1980)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR DISBARMENT OF TELESFORO A. DIAO, v. SEVERINO G. MARTINEZ, Petitioner (A.C. No. 244, 29 March 1963)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject FATHER RANHILIO C. AQUINO, Et - Al., Complainants, v. ATTY. EDWIN PASCUA, Respondent (A.C. NO. 5095, 28 November 2007)
Case Digest Basic Legal Ethics Subject Re: Non-disclosure Before the Judicial and Bar Council of the Administrative Case Filed Against Judge Jaime V. Quitain, in His Capacity as the then Asst. Regional Director of the National Police Commission, Regional Office XI, Davao City [JBC No. 013, 22 August 2007