DSS VTU Notes PDF
DSS VTU Notes PDF
Dr. M. C. Nataraja
PART-A
PART-A
UNIT 1 - INTRODUCTION
Anyone managing the construction process needs a basic understanding of the engineer’s
environment and the basic understanding of how a structure behaves. Constructors must be able
to address a number of technical questions at the project site including structural issues that
sometimes are not addressed by the design professionals. Since the safety of construction
workers as well as the strength and stability of structures during the construction phase is of
paramount importance, construction mangers need this knowledge.
Structural Design
Alternatives
• Earthquake Loads (the effects of ground motion are simulated by a system of horizontal
forces)
• Snow Load (varies with geographical location and drift)
• Other Loads (hydrostatic pressure, soil pressure)
• If the load is applied suddenly, the effects of IMPACT must be accounted for.
• If the load is applied and removed many times over the life of the structure, FATIGUE
stress must be accounted for
Design Specifications
• Provide guidance for the design of structural members and their connections.
• They have no legal standing on their own, but they can easily be adopted, by reference, as
part of a building code.
• American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-99) Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete
• National Design Specifications for Wood Construction by American Forest and Paper
Association.
Structural Steel
• Steel is an alloy of primarily iron, carbon (1 to 2%) and small amount of other
components (manganese, nickel, …)
• Carbon contributes to strength but reduces ductility.
Steel Properties
A member is selected such that the max stress due to working loads does not exceed an
allowable stress.
• A member is selected such that its factored strength is more than the factored loads.
o Σ(loads x L factors) ⊆ resistance x R factor
• Each load effect (DL, LL, ..)has a different load factor which its value depends on the
combination of loads under consideration.
Load Factors
Resistance Factor
• The resistance factors range in value from 0.75 to 1.0 depending on the type of resistance
(tension, bending, compression, ..)
• These factors account for uncertainties in material properties, design theory, and
fabrication and construction practices.
History
• ASD has been the primary method used for steel design since the first AISC
specifications was issued in 1923.
• In 1986, AISC issued the first specification for LRFD.
• The trend today is toward LRFD method, but ASD is still in use.
• It provides a more uniform reliability in all structures subjected to many types of loading
conditions. It does not treat DL and LL as equivalent, thereby leading to a more rational
approach.
• It provides better economy as the DL make up a greater percentage on a given
structure. Because DLs are less variable by nature than live loads, a lower load
factor is used.
This may lead to a reduction in member size and therefore better economy
1.1General
Structural steel is a material used for steel construction, which is formed with a specific
shape following certain standards of chemical composition and strength. They can also be
defined as hot rolled products, with a cross section of special form like angles, channels and
beams/joints. There has been an increasing demand for structural steel for construction purposes
in the United States and India.
Measures are been taken by the structural steel authority for ready availability of structural
steel on time for the various projects. The people at every level are working hard to realize the
purpose of producing steel on time, like, service centers, producers, fabricators and erectors
along with the general contractors, engineers and architects are all working hand in hand. Steel
has always been more preferred to concrete because steel offers better tension and compression
thus resulting in lighter construction. Usually structural steel uses three dimensional trusses
hence making it larger than its concrete counterpart. There are different new techniques which
The structural steel all over the world pre-dominates the construction scenario. This material
has been exhaustively used in various constructions all over the world because of its various
specific characteristics that are very much ideally suited for construction. Structural steel is
durable and can be well molded to give the desired shape to give an ultimate look to the structure
that has been constructed. There is a mention of The Super dome situated in the United States
and The Fukuoka Dome of Japan; both speak the unique language of the unique capabilities of
the structural steel.
Various types of structural steel sections and their technical specifications are as follows:
• Beams
• Channels
• Angles
• Flats
The most commonly found steel beam is the. I beam or the wide flanged beam also known by
the name of universal beam or stouter sections as the universal column. Such beams are
commonly used in the construction of bridges and steel frame buildings.
The most commonly found types of steel beams are varied and they are mentioned below:
• I beams
• Wide flange beams
• HP shape beams
Materials Used
In today’s modern construction the beams are generally made up of materials like:
• Steel
• Wood
• Reinforced concrete
• Hat channels: This channel has legs that are folded in the outward direction resembling
an old fashioned man's hat.
• U channels: This most common and basic channel variety. It has a base known as a web
and two equal length legs.
• C channels: In this channel the legs are folded back in the channel and resemble the
letter-C. C channels are known as rests.
• Hemmed channels: In this kind of channel the top of the leg is folded hence forming
double thickness.
There are other variations of channels that are available, which are customized according to the
customer's needs.
Application
Steel channels are subjected to a wide array of applications. The application fields are:
• Construction
• Appliances
• Transportation
• Used in making Signposts
• Used in wood flooring for athletic purposes
A major variant of the channel is the mild steel channel. Such channels are generally used in
heavy industries. They are used in the heavy machinery industry and automotive industry too.
• Applications
the steel angle finds an application in a number of things, they are mentioned
below:
• Used in framing
• Used in trims
• For reinforcement
• In brackets
• Used in transmission towers
• Bridges
• Lifting and transporting machinery
Applications
The steel flats are used in a wide array of applications. The varied applications are listed below:
Its great strength, uniformity, light weight, easy of use, and many other desirable
properties makes it the material of choice for numerous structures such as steel bridges, high rise
buildings, towers, and other structure.
Ductility: A very desirable of property of steel, in which steel can withstand extensive
deformation without failure under high tensile stresses, i:e., it gives warning before failure takes
place.
Additions to existing structures: Example: new bays or even entire new wings can be added to
existing frame buildings, and steel bridges may easily be widened.
For example steel columns sometimes cannot provide the necessary strength because of
buckling, where as RCC columns generally sturdy and massive, i:e., no buckling problem occurs.
Maintenance cost: Steel structures are susceptible to corrosion when exposed to air.
Fire proofing cost: steel is an incombustible material; however, its strength is reduced
tremendously at high temperature due to common fires.
Fatigue: The strength of structural steel member can be reduced if this member is subjected to
cyclic loading.
Brittle fracture: under certain conditions steel lose its ductility, and brittle fracture may occur at
places of stress concentration. Fatigue type loadings and very low temperature trigger the
situation.
2. To prevent the threaded portion of the bolt from bearing on the connecting pieces.
In order to assure proper functioning of the connection, the parts to be connected must be tightly
clamped between the bolt between the bolt head and nut. If the connection is subjected
2. The tensile strength of the bolt is reduced because of area reduction at the root of the
thread and also due to stress concentration.
3. Normally these are of a loose fit excepting turned bolts and hence their strength is
reduced.
Uses
1. Bolts can be used for making end connections in tensions and compression member.
3. They can be used as separators for purlins and beams in foundations, etc.
Types
There are several types of bolts used to connect the structural elements. Some of the bolts
commonly used are:
a) Unfinished bolts
b) Turned bolts
e) Interference bolts
UNFINISHED BOLTS
Unfinished bolts are also called ordinary, common, rough or black bolts. There are used for light
structures (purlins, bracings, etc.) under static loads. They are not recommended for connections
subjected to impact load, vibrations and fatigue. Bolts are forged from low carbon rolled steel
circular rods, permitting large tolerances. Ordinary structural bolts are made from mild steel with
square or hexagonal head, as shown in Fig 1.0(b). Square heads cost less but hexagonal heads
give a better appearance, are easier to hold by wrenches and require less turning space. The bolt
hole is punched about 1.6mm more than the bolt diameter. The nuts on bolts are tightened with
spud wrenches, producing little tension. Therefore, no clamping force is induced on the sections
jointed. Sometimes a hole is drilled in the bolt and a cotter pin with a castellated nut is used to
prevent the nut from turning on the bolt, as shown in Fig 1.0(c). the connections with unfinished
bolts are designed in a similar way as all the riveted connections except that the permissible
stresses are reduced to account for tolerances provide on shank and threaded portion of the bolts.
The requirements regarding pitch and edge distance are same as that for rivets. The permissible
stresses are as given in Table 8.1 of I.S:800-1984.
TURNED BOLTS
These are similar to unfinished bolts, with the differences that the shank of these bolts is formed
from a hexagonal rod. The surfaces of the bolts are prepared carefully and are machined to fit in
the hole. Tolerances allowed are very small. These bolts have high shear and bearing resistance
as compared to unfinished bolts. However, these bolts are obsolete nowadays. The specifications
for turned bolts are given in I.S:2591-1969.
RIBBED BOLTS
These are also called fluted bolts. The head of the bolt is like a rivet head. The threaded and nut
are provided on the other end of the shank. From the shank core longitudinal ribs project making
the diameter of the shank more than the diameter of the hole. These ribs cut grooves into the
connected members while tightening and ensure a tight fit. These bolts have more resistance to
2. Large tensile stresses are developed in bolts, which in turn provide large clamping force
to the elements connected. High frictional resistances is developed providing a high static
strength the joint.
3. Because of the clamping action, load is transmitted by friction only and the bolts are not
subjected to shear and bearing.
5. There are no stress concentrations in the holes; therefore, the fatigue strength is more.
6. The tension in bolts is uniform. Also the bolts are tensioned up to proof load hence; the
nuts are prevented from loosening
7. Few persons are require to make the connections, thus cost is reduced.
8. Noise nuisance is not there as these bolts are tightened with wrenches.
9. The hazard of fire is not there and there is no danger of tossing of the bolt.
11. For some strength, lesser number of bolts are required as compared to rivets which brings
overall economy.
F = µT
This frictional force F should exceed the applied force P on the member.
PIN CONNECTIONS
When two structural members are connected by means of a cylindrical shaped pin, the
connection is called a pin connection. Pins are manufactured from mild steel bars with diameters
ranging from 9 to 330 mm. Pin connections are provided when hinged joints are required, i.e.,
for the connection where zero moment of free rotation is desired. Introduction of a hinge
simplifies the analysis by reducing indeterminacy. These also reduce the secondary stresses.
These connections cannot resist longitudinal tension. For satisfactory working it is necessary to
minimize the friction between the and members connected. High grade machining is done to
make the pin and pin hole surface smooth and frictionless. Pins are provided in the following
cases:
1. Tie rod connections water tanks and elevated bins
4. Hinged arches
Lap joint The two members to be connected are overlapped and connected together. Such a
joint is called a lap joint as in Fig. (a). A single riveted lap joint and a double riveted lap joint
are shown in Figs (b,c) respectively. The load in the lap joint has eccentricity, as the centre of
gravity of load in one member and the centre of gravity of load in the second member are not
in the same line, as shown in Fig. 2.2(d). Therefore, a couple is formed which causes
undesirable bending in the connection and the rivets may fail in tension. To minimize the
effect of bending in lap joints at least two rivets in a line should be provided. Also, due to the
eccentricity the stresses are distributed un-evenly across the contact area between rivets and
the members to be connected. This puts a limitation on the use of lap joints.
Butt joint The two members to be connected are placed end to end. Additional plate/plates
provided on either one or both sides, called cover plates and are connected to the main plates
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES 22
as in Figs 2.2(e,h). If the cover plate is provided on one side as in Figs 2.2(f), (g), it is called
a single cover butt joint but if the cover plates are provided on both the sides of main plates it
is called a double cover butt joint as shown in Fig. 2.2.(i),(j). It is more desirable to provide a
butt joint than a lap joint for two main reasons:
In the case of double cover butt joint the total shear force to be transmitted by the members is
split into two parts and the force acts on each half as shown in Fig. 2.2(k). But in the case of
lap joint (Fig. 2.2(I), there is only one plane on which the force acts and therefore the shear
carrying capacity of a rivet in a butt joint is double that of a rivet in a lap joint.
In the case of a double cover butt joint, eccentricity of force does not exist and hence bending
is eliminated, whereas it exists in the case of a lap joint.
If there are ‘n’ numbers of bolts in the connection, direct design shear force on each bolt is given
by,
Vsb = P/n
The moment causes tension in top side and compression in the bottom side. On tension side, only
bolts resist load but on compression side entire contact zone between the columns and the
connecting angle resist the load. Hence the neutral axis will be much below in these connections.
It is assumed to lie at a height of 1/7 th of the depth of the bracket, measured from the bottom
edge of the angle.
The tensile force in a bolt Tbi is proportional to its distance yi from the line of rotation.
Tbi ∝ yi
Tbi
M ' = k ∑ y 2i = ∑y
2
i
yi
M ' yi
Tbi =
∑ y 2i
Or
M ' yi
T = ∑ Tbi =
∑ y 2i
For equilibrium,
M ' ∑ yi
T =C =
∑y 2
i
2h
M = M '+C
37
2h ∑ y i
= M ' 1 + 2
21 ∑ y i
This equation gives the moment resisted by the bolts in tension from which the maximum tensile
force in the extreme bolt Tb can be calculated. Then the design required is
2 2
Vsb Tb
+ ≤ 1.0
Vdh Tdh
Step 3: Bolts are to be provided in two vertical rows. Number of bolts necessary in each row is
computed from the expression.
6M
n=
(2V )P
Where M is the moment on the joint and V is the design strength of bolt.
Step 4: Find the direct shear and tensile forces acting on the extreme bolt. If it is HSFG bolted
connection adds prying force [Ref. Fig. 3.28] to direct tension. Check whether the interaction
formula is satisfied.
Example 3.11
Solution:
1 400 π 2
Design strength of bolt in single shear = 0 + 0.78 X X 24
1.25 3 4
= 65192 N
e p f
Kb is minimum of , − 0 . 25 , ub and 1 . 0
3d 0 3d 0 fu
50 70 400
i.e., minimum of , − 0 . 25 , and 1 . 0
3 X 27 3 X 27 410
. ‘. Kb = 0.6412
1
= X 2 . 25 X 0 . 6142 X 24 X 9 X 410
1 . 25
0 .90 Xf ub XA n f yb Asb
Tbi = <
1 . 25 1 . 10
π
240 X X 24 2
0 . 90 X 400 π 4
Tbi = X 0 . 78 X X 24 2 <
1 .25 4 1 .10
= 98703N
Using two rows of bolting, approximately number of bolts required in each row
h = 50+70x10=750mm
h/7 = 107.14mm
.'.∑ y 2 = 2 X 1479142mm
2
=155397179N-mm
M ' yi 155397179
Tb = = X 642 .86 = 33769 N
∑ y i 2 X 1479142
2
600 X 1000
Vsb = = 27273 N
2 X 11
2 2
Vsb Tb
Check by interaction formula = +
Vdb T
db
2 2
27273 33769
= +
65192 98703
Hence the bots are safe. Provide bots as shown in Fig. 3.29.
There are two types of HSFG bolts. They are parallel shank and waisted shank type. Parallel
shank type HSFG bolts are designed for no-slip at serviceability loads. Hence they slip at higher
loads and slip into bearing at ultimate loads. Hence such bolts are checked for their bearing
strength at ultimate load. Waisted shank HSFG bolts are designed for no slip even at ultimate
load and hence there is no need to check for their bearing strength.
Vnsf = µf ne Kh F0
Where,
[Note: ne = 1 for lap joints and 2 for double cover butt joints]
= 0.85 for fasteners in oversized and short slotted holes and for long slotted holes located
perpendicular to the slot.
=0.70 for fasteners in long slotted holes loaded parallel to the slot.
π
Anb = net area of the bolt at threads = 0.78 d2
4
Where,
=1.10, if the slip resistance is designed at service load (Parallel shank HSFG)
=1.25, if the slip resistance is designed at ultimate load (Waisted shank HSFG).
It may be noted that the reduction factors specified (Fig. 3.11) for bearing bolts hold good for
HSFG bolts also.
For commonly used HSFG bolts (Grade 8.8), yield stress fyb =640 Mpa and ultimate stress fub
=800 N/mm2
Example 3.12
Determine the shear capacity of bolts used in connecting two plates as shown in Fig.3.30
Given:
HSFG bolts of grade 8.8 are used.
Fasteners are in clearance holes
Solution:
For HSFG bolts of grade 8.8,
For fasteners in clearance holes Kh = 1.0
Vnsf = µf nc Kh F0
π
= 0.7 X 800 X 0.78 X X 20 2
4
(i) Design capacity of one bolt, if slip resistance is designated at service load
= 82335 N
= 82335/1.1 =74850 N
= 449099 N
= 449.099 kN
(ii) Design capacity of one bolt, if the slip resistance is designated at ultimate load
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES 33
= 82335/1.25 =65868 N
= 395208 N
= 395.208 kN
In case (i), bearing strength at ultimate load should be checked. If it is low that will be the
governing factor.
γ mb
Tnf = 0.9 Xf ub XAn ≤ f yb Asb
γm
0.9 f ub An f yb Asb
Tdf = ≤
γ mb γm
Where
An = net tensile area as specified in various parts of IS 1367, it may be taken as the area at the
π
root of the thread = 0.78 d 2
4
fub for bolts of grade 8.8 is 800 MPa and fyb = 640 MPa.
PRYING FORCES
In the design of HSFG bolts subjected to tensile forces, an additional force, called as prying force
Q is to be considered. These additional forces are mainly due to flexibility of connected plates.
Consider the connection of a T-section to a plate as shown in Fig 3.31, subject to tensile force
2Te.
As tensile force acts, the flange of T-section bends in the middle portion and presses connecting
plates near bolts. It gives rise to additional contact forces known as prying forces. During late
80s and early 90s lot of research works were published regarding assessing prying force. IS 800-
2007 has accepted the following expression
ly βη f 0 be t 4
Q= Te −
2lc 27 lc l 2 y
Where
ly = distance from the bolt centre line to the toe of the fillet weld or to half the root radius for a
rolled section.
lc = distance between prying forces and bolt centre line and is the minimum of either the end
distance or the value given by:
βf0
lc = 1.1t
fy
η = 1.5
Note that prying forces do not develop in case of ordinary bolts, since when bolt failure takes
place contact between the two connecting plates is lost (Ref. Fig. 3.32).
βf0
lc = 1.1t
fy
1 X 0.7 X 410
lc = 1.1 X 16 = 18 .86 <
250
< Edge distance
lc = 18.86 mm
Prying force is given by,
ly βη f 0 be t 4
Q= Te −
2lc 27 lc l 2 y
η = 1.5
be = 140mm, t = 16mm.
0.9 f ub Aub
Tension capacity of the bolt =
1.25
π
0.9 X 800 X 0.78 X X 20 2
= 4
1.25
CONTENTS
Introduction
Plastic theory
IS 800 - 2007 permits plastic analysis as per the Cl. 4.5 (pp 25 and 26).
However, the requirements specified in Cl. 4.5.2 shall be satisfied unless otherwise
specified.
• The yield stress of the grade of structural steel used shall not exceed 450 MPa.
• The stress - strain characteristics of steel shall comply with IS : 2062 to ensure
complete plastic moment redistribution.
• The stress - strain diagram shall have a plateau at the yield stress level extending for
at least six times the yield strain.
• The ratio of ultimate tensile stress to the yield stress for the specified grade of steel
shall not be less than 1.2
• The percentage elongation shall not be less than 15 and the steel shall exhibit strain -
hardening capabilities. (Steel confirming to IS : 2062 shall be deemed to satisfy the above
requirements)
• The members shall be hot - rolled or fabricated using hot - rolled plates and sections.
• The cross section of the members shall be plastic (class 1 section) at plastic hinges
and elsewhere at least compact sections. (class 2 section) Table 2 shall be followed in this
regard.
• The cross section shall be symmetrical about the axis perpendicular to the axis of the
plastic hinge rotation indicating that the beams shall be symmetrical about y-y axis and
columns shall be symmetrical about both y-y and z-z axes.
• The members shall not be subjected to impact and fluctuating loading requiring
fracture and fatigue assessment.
A typical stress - strain curve of steel confirming to IS : 2062 is shown in the figure.
where,
From the stress - strain curve, steel yields considerably at a constant stress due to
large flow of the material. This property known as ductility enables steel to undergo large
deformations beyond the elastic limit without danger of fracture. This unique property of
steel is utilized in plastic analysis of structures.
Stress - Strain Curve (Typical)
Consider a three bar system shown below of length and area of C/S of each bar as
indicated. E is the modulus of elasticity of the material.
Plastic analysis:
In plastic analysis, it will be assumed that even though the middle bar reaches the
yield stress, they start yielding until the outer bars also reaches the yield stress. (Ductility
of steel and redistribution of forces) With this, all the bars would have reached yield
stress and the failure load (or ultimate load or collapse load) is given by
Collapse load, Pu = 2 fy A + fy A = 3fyA ------ Maximum load by plastic analysis
The collapse load calculated by plastic analysis is 1.5 times that of the elastic analysis.
(Reserve strength) Plastic analysis can give economical solutions.
The simple plastic theory makes use of the ductility of steel. (Large strain at
collapse) The following assumptions are made in plastic bending of beams -
• With further increase in BM, M3 > My, yielding spreads into inner fibres. The c/s
is elasto - plastic and the internal moment of resistance can be computed, if
required from the stress distribution shown below.
• Finally, the yielding of fibres spreads almost for the entire c/s and the BM, M4 at
this stage is called the plastic moment MP .The c/s is said to be fully plasticized. A
plastic hinge is formed at this stage. After this, the deflection increases rapidly
resulting in collapse or failure. The neutral axis, NA is now called the Equal Area
Axis. An idealized stress distribution is shown below.
Basic Definitions:
Mathematically, MP = fY Zpz
fy is the yield stress of the material
Zpz is the plastic section modulus of the c/s about z-z axis
It is defined as the moment of resistance of a c/s whose extreme fibres only has
reached yield stress, fy.
Mathematically, My = fY Zez
fy is the yield stress of the material
Zez is the elastic section modulus of the c/s about z-z axis
Plastic hinge:
It is defined a point in a flexural member where full plastic moment has developed
and is rotating at a constant moment, MP. The following characteristics are observed with
respect to a plastic hinge :
It is the length in a beam over which the BM is greater than the yield moment, My
Example 1
Example 2
Consider a simply supported beam subjected to a UDL which has yielded over the shaded
area as shown. Let Lp and L be the length of the plastic hinge and span of the beam.
Let x = Lp / 2
My = wu L / 2 * (L / 2 - x) - wu (L / 2 - x)2 / 2
= wu L2 / 4 - (wu L / 2) * x - wu / 2 * (L2 / 4 + x2 - L x)
Cancelling (wu L / 2) * x, we have
My = wu L2 / 8 - wu x2 / 2
= wu L2 / 8 - wu L2 / 8 * (4 x2 / L2)
Noting Mp = wu L2 / 8, we have
My = Mp (1 - 4 x2 / L2)
My / Mp = (1 - 4 x2 / L2)
1 / S = (1 - 4 x2 / L2)
4 x2 / L2 = 1 - 1 / S
x2 = L2 / 4 (1 - 1 / S)
x = L / 2 √ (1 - 1 / S)
Lp / 2 = L / 2 √ (1 - 1 / S)
Lp = L √ (1 - 1 / S)
For a rectangular section, S = 1.5 and Lp = 0.577 * L
For typical I - sections, S = 1.14 and Lp = 0.35 * L
Length of plastic hinge depends on the shape factor of the c/s
Note :
From the above examples, it is observed that the length of the plastic hinge is
dependent on the loading and shape factor. It is also dependent on the support conditions.
For propped cantilevers, fixed beams, continuous beams and rigid frames, it is still
difficult to calculate the length of plastic hinges for different loadings and supports.
Hence, it is customary to assume the plastic hinge in the analysis as a point where all the
plastic rotation takes place.
Redistribution of Moments :
The maximum elastic BM occurs at the supports and is equal to wL2 / 12 . As a first step,
the plastic hinges are formed at the supports and complete plasticization of the support c/s
takes place. But this do not mean failure or collapse occurs. This is because a plastic
hinge at the centre should also be formed. (No. of plastic hinges in indeterminate
structures = SI + 1) At this stage, the plastic hinges formed at the supports will be rotating
at constant moment, Mp due to ductility of the material. Collapse of the beam occurs only
when complete plasticization occurs at the centre resulting greater load carrying capacity.
At collapse, using equilibrium method, we have
wu L2 / 8 = 2 Mp
wu = 16 Mp / L2 ----------- Collapse load for the beam
The beam is capable of carrying 52% more load beyond the first yield.
Consider a c/s symmetrical about the vertical y-y axis as shown below with the
section fully plasticized.
A1 and A2 are the areas above and below the Neutral Axis (Equal Area Axis)
fY is the yield stress in the material
Compressive force above the NA = fy A1
Tensile force below the NA = fy A2
For equilibrium, the forces are equal -
fy A1= fy A2 from which
A1 = A2
For a fully plasticized c/s, area above the NA = area below the NA
In other words, A1 + A2 = A
A1 + A1 = A
A1 = A2 = A/2
The neutral axis (NA) of a fully plasticized section is called the equal area axis (EAA)
The plastic moment of a fully plasticized section can be obtained by taking moments of
the forces above and below the EAA about EAA.
Mp = fy A1 Y1 + fy A2 Y2
= fy A/2 Y1 + fy A/2 Y2
= fy A/2 (Y1 + Y2)
= fy Zpz
where, Zpz = plastic section modulus of the c/s about z-z axis = [A/2 (Y1 + Y2)]
The plastic section modulus of a c/s, Zpz is defined as the moment of the areas above
and below EAA about the EAA. It is the resisting modulus of a completely plasticized
section and is a geometric property.
Shape factor, S:
It is defined as the ratio of plastic moment, MP to yield moment, MY. Also, called
form factor.
Mathematically, S = MP / My
= fY Zpz / fY Zez
= Zpz / Zez
It is also the ratio between the plastic section modulus to the elastic section modulus
of a c/s and is a geometric property
1. Rectangle:
ZP = [(bD / 2) x D/4] x 2
= bD2 / 4
S = Zpz / Zez
= 1.5
zez = 3060.4 cm3 (From hand book; Table I, pp - 4,5 ) = 3060.4 x 103 mm3
zpz = [ 210 x 20.8 x (600/2 - 20.8/2) + 12 x (600/2 - 20.8) x (600/2 - 20.8)/2 ] x 2
= 3465.38 x 103 mm3 (The value given in Table 46; pp - 138 is 3510.63 x 103 mm3)
If the above c/s is used over an effective span of 8m, the permissible UDL on the beam is
calculated as -
Yield Moment, MY = fY Zez (Assuming fy =250 MPa)
= 250 x 3060.4 x 103
= 765.1 x 106 N mm
= 765.1 kN m
If the c/s is symmetrical about the horizontal z - z axis or NA, then both NA and EAA
will co inside.
The plastic section modulus is calculated by taking moments of the area above and below
the EAA about EAA.
Zpz = 150 * 9.69 * 9.69 / 2 + 150 * 0.31 * 0.31 / 2 + 10 * 140 * (140 / 2 + 0.31)
= 105.48 x 103 mm3
(0.31 = 10 - 9.69 ; 140 = 150 - 10)
If UDL or other loads are required, maximum BM which depends on the type of loading
and span is equated to working bending moment.
The elastic properties of the section is obtained from Table II, pp 6 - 7 of ISI handbook
[SP (6) - 1)]
If UDL or other loads are required, maximum BM which depends on the type of loading
and span is equated to working bending moment.
The elastic properties of the section is obtained from Table XIV, pp 54 - 55 of ISI
handbook [SP (6) - 1)]
The beam is symmetrical about z - z axis and hence, NA and EAA co inside
Mean thickness of flange = (320 * 40 + 210 * 20.8) / 320 = 53.65 mm (Table XIV gives
mean thickness of flange = 53.3 mm)
(210 and 20.8 = width of flange and thickness of flange of ISMB 600 @ 122.6kg/m)
Mean thickness > 40 mm
If UDL or other loads are required, maximum BM which depends on the type of loading
and span is equated to working bending moment.
6. Plate girder section, say Two 500 x 40 flange plates (one on each side), Four flange
angles (two on each side) and One web plate 1600 x 16
The beam is symmetrical about z - z axis and hence, NA and EAA co inside
If UDL or other loads are required, maximum BM which depends on the type of loading
and span is equated to working bending moment.
7. Box section, say 300 x 600 outer dimensions with 12 mm as uniform thickness
.
Consider the section as shown.
The beam is symmetrical about z - z axis and hence, NA and EAA co inside
If UDL or other loads are required, maximum BM which depends on the type of loading
and span is equated to working bending moment.
8. Unsymmetrical I section
If UDL or other loads are required, maximum BM which depends on the type of loading
and span is equated to working bending moment.
Mechanisms:
If all the three conditions are satisfied in plastic analysis, then we get the true collapse
load. However, if any two conditions are satisfied, we get a load which is either below or
above the true collapse load.
This theorem states that the load computed from any distribution of BMDs in
equilibrium with external loads (safe and statically admissible BMD) so that the
maximum BM in any member shall not exceed its plastic moment, Mp (M < or = Mp) is
less than or equal to the true collapse load. This theorem leads to equilibrium or static
method of plastic analysis.
This theorem also called the safe theorem satisfies equilibrium and plastic
moment condition.
This theorem states that the load computed from any assumed kinematically
admissible mechanism is greater than or equal to the true collapse load. This theorem
leads to kinematic or mechanism method of analysis.
This theorem also called the unsafe theorem satisfies equilibrium and mechanism
condition. A kinematically admissible mechanism (deformation) is one in which the
deformation (rotation and deflection) under the load and supports satisfies the virtual
work equation. (internal work by the plastic moment at plastic hinges = external work by
the loads on the structure)
Uniqueness Theorem :
This theorem states that if the load evaluated by static and kinematic theorems is
same, then it is the true collapse load. All the three conditions of plastic analysis are
satisfied. According to this theorem, there is only one unique solution for a given
structure, while there are innumerable possible solutions with other theorems.
All the three theorems are graphically shown in the figure below.
This method is based on the lower bound theorem and consists of the following steps:
i) The redundant forces are chosen.
ii) Free BMD (Simply supported) of the structure is drawn.
iii) Redundant BMD of the structure is drawn.
iv) The two BMDs are combined and the peak moments are determined. The peak
moment points are set the corresponding plastic moment, Mp . Also, check the number
of plastic hinges formed.
v) The collapse load is determined using the equilibrium condition by equating the
maximum simply supported BM to the plastic moment at the corresponding point.
vi) A check is applied so that plastic moment at any point is not > or = Mp at that point.
vii) BMD and SFD are drawn if required.
Kinematic or Mechanism method:
This method is based on the upper bound theorem and consists of the following steps:
i) The possible points of plastic hinges (N) formation is located. They are invariably
formed at points of maximum BM, Continuous supports, Fixed supports, rigid joints,
etc.,
ii) The number of independent mechanisms and combined mechanisms are determined.
In beams, only independent mechanisms are required. No. of independent
mechanisms = N - SI , where N = No. of plastic hinges possible and SI = Static
indeterminacy
iii) Using the principle of virtual work, the equilibrium equation involving the internal
work done by plastic moment, Mp and the external work done by loads are equated to
determine the plastic collapse load.
iv) A check is applied so that plastic moment at any point is not > or = Mp at that point.
v) BMD and SFD are drawn if required.
In this method , the elastic strain energy is ignored and the internal work done at
only plastic hinges is considered.
This principle is used for determining the collapse loads using mechanism
method. This principle establishes the equilibrium relation between the work done by
external loads and the internal work done by the plastic moment at specified location of
plastic hinges. The principle is stated as follows :
External Work done by the loads = Internal Work done by the plastic moment a the
location of the plastic hinges.
Equilibrium method -
Maximum free BM = WU * L / 4
Plastic moment of the section = MP
Equating, WU * L / 4 = MP
WU = 4 * M P / L
Mechanism method -
Problem 2
Equilibrium method -
Maximum free BM = WU * L / 4
Plastic moment of the section = MP + MP / 2 = 1.5 MP
Equating, WU * L / 4 = 1 5 MP
WU = 6 * M P / L
Mechanism method -
Problem 3
BC = x and AC = ( L- x)
At C, SF = 0
2 MP / x2 = 4 Mp / (L-x)2
Simplifying, we get
x2 + 2Lx - L2 = 0
x=-L+√2*L
x = 0.414 L (BC) and L - x = 0.586 L (AC)
wu = 11.66 Mp / L2
Equilibrium method -
Simply supported BM at 0.414 L from B
= wu L / 2 * 0.414L - wu * ( 0.414L)2 / 2
= 0.1213 wu L2
Plastic moment of the section = MP + 0.414 MP = 1.414 MP
Equating,
1.414 MP = = 0.1213 wu L2
wu = 11.66 Mp / L2
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 2 Mp θ + Mp θ1
External work done = 0.5 * L * δ * wu ( Area under the mechanism * intensity of
loading)
From geometry,
δ = 0.586L θ = 0.414L θ1
Equating,
2 Mp θ + Mp θ1 = 0.5 * L * δ * wu
2 Mp θ + Mp * 1.415 θ = 0.5 * L * 0.586L θ * wu
3.415 Mp = 0.293 wu L2
wu = 11.66 Mp / L2
Equilibrium method -
Plastic hinges at A and C
Maximum free BM = 10 * 2.5 = 25 kNM
Plastic moment of the section = MP + 0.5 MP = 1.5 MP
Equating, 25 = 1.5 MP
MP = 16.67 kNm
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 2 * MP * θ + MP * θ1
External work done = 20 * δ + 10 * δ1
From geometry, δ = 3.75 θ , δ = 1.25 θ1, θ1 = 3 θ and δ1 = 2.5 θ
Equating, 2 * MP * θ + MP * θ1 = 20 * δ + 10 * δ1
2 * MP * θ + MP * 3 θ = 20 * 3.75 θ + 10 * 2.5 θ
MP = 20 kNm
Problem 5
Calculate the collapse load for the fixed beam shown with Mp = 100 kNm
By inspection, we note that collapse occurs when plastic hinges are formed at A, C and D.
Equilibrium method -
Plastic hinges at A, B and C
Maximum free BM at C = (10 / 6) WU * 2 = (10 / 3) WU
Plastic moment of the section = MP + MP = 2 MP
Equating, (10 / 3) WU = 2 MP = 200 kNm
WU = 60 kN
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 2 * MP * θ + 2 * MP * θ1
External work done = 2 WU * δ + WU * δ1
From geometry, δ = 2 θ , δ = 4 θ1, θ1 = 0.5 θ and δ1 = 2 θ1 = θ
Equating internal and external work done,
2 * MP * θ + 2 * MP * θ1 = 2 WU * δ + WU * δ1
2 * MP * θ + 2 * MP * 0.5 θ = 2 WU * 2 θ + WU * θ
3MP = 5 WU
WU = 0.6 MP = 60 kN
Problem 6
The plastic hinges are formed at A , B and C based on crossing of shear force at C
The Simply supported reactions at A and B are 1.25WU and 0.75WU respectively.
Equilibrium method -
Plastic hinges at A, B and C
Maximum free BM at C = 0.75 WU * L
Plastic moment of the section = MP + MP = 2 MP
Equating, 0.75 WU * L = 2 MP
WU = (8 / 3) MP / L
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 4 * MP * θ
External work done = WU * δ + 0.5 * L * δ * WU / L
From geometry, δ = L θ
Equating internal and external work done,
4 * MP * θ = WU * δ + 0.5 * L * L θ * WU / L
4 * M P * θ = W U * L θ + WU * L θ / 2
4MP = 1.5 WU L
WU = (8 / 3) MP / L
Problem 7
Fixed beam with different plastic moments. The beam is shown in the figure.
The Simply supported reactions at A and B are 1.25WU and 1.75WU respectively.
Equilibrium method -
Mechanism method -
2WU * 6 + WU * 2 + 2 MP - MP - VB * 8 = 0
VB = 1.538 MP
VA = 0.885 MP
SFD can be drawn.
Problem 8
A two span continuous beam is shown below. All the loads are service loads.
No. of possible plastic hinges = 4 (B, Between A and B, under each concentrated load.
No. of relevant mechanisms = 4 - 1 = 3
Each mechanism is similar to a propped cantilever.
Mechanism 1 -
Plastic hinges will be at B and in between A and B. The distance x where the SF is zero is
worked as in propped cantilever using segment equilibrium method. However, the value
of plastic moment at B shall be chosen lesser of the two values ie MP. The plastic moment
in between A and B is 2MP.
The location of the plastic hinge at F is carried out by segment equilibrium method. Let
the hinge at F be at distance x from A.
AF = x and BF = (12 - x)
At F, SF = 0
Equilibrium Method -
Simply supported BM at 5.394 m from A –
SS BM = 360 * 5.394 - 60 * 5.3942 / 2 = 1068.98 kNm
Total Plastic Moment at the section = (2.0 + 0.45) MP = 2.45 MP
Equating SS BM to the total plastic moment,
1068.98 = 2.45 MP
MP = 436.32 kNm
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 2 Mp θ2 + 3Mp θ1
External work done = 0.5 * 12 * δ * 60 = 360 δ
From geometry,
δ = 5.394 θ2 = 6.606 θ1
Equating,
2 Mp θ2 + 3Mp θ1 = 360 δ
2 Mp θ2 + 3Mp * (5.394 / 6.606) * θ2 = 360 * 5.394 θ2
4.45 Mp = 1941.84
Mp = 436.37 kNm
Note : All methods give the same answer. The student shall check the question and
accordingly answer. If no method is specified, then the student can have his /her
choice.
Mechanism 2 -
Plastic hinges will be formed at B and D ( under 150 kN load near B).
Equilibrium Method -
Simply supported BM at 3.0 m from B -
SS BM = 225 * 3.0 = 675 kNm
Total Plastic Moment at the section = (1.0 + 2/3) MP = 5/3 MP
Equating SS BM to the total plastic moment,
675 = 5/3 MP
MP = 405 kNm
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 2 Mp θ + Mp θ1
External work done = 225 * δ + 225 * δ1
From geometry,
δ = 3 θ = 6 θ1 ; θ1 = 0.5 θ
and δ1 = 3 θ1 = 1.5 θ
Equating,
2 Mp θ + Mp θ1 = 225 * δ + 225 * δ1
2 Mp θ + Mp * 0.5 θ = 225 * 3 θ + 225 * 1.5 θ
2.5 Mp = 1012.5
Mp = 405 kNm
Mechanism 3 -
Equilibrium Method -
Simply supported BM at 3.0 m from C -
SS BM = 225 * 3.0 = 675 kNm
Total Plastic Moment at the section = (1.0 + 1/3) MP = 4/3 MP
Equating SS BM to the total plastic moment,
675 = 4/3 MP
MP = 506.25 kNm
Mechanism method -
Internal work done = 2 Mp θ + Mp θ1
External work done = 225 * δ + 225 * δ1
From geometry,
δ = 6 θ = 3 θ1 ; θ1 = 2 θ
and δ1 = 3 θ
Equating,
2 Mp θ + Mp θ1 = 225 * δ + 225 * δ1
2 Mp θ + Mp * 2 θ = 225 * 6 θ + 225 * 3 θ
4 Mp = 2025
Mp = 506.25 kNm
The largest value of MP shall be chosen. For the given problem, MP = 506.25 kNm
The reactions for the beams are calculated as in elastic analysis by taking moments about
any support and using the vertical equilibrium equation. The reactions are shown are
below. BMD and SFD are also indicated. The BM has not exceeded the relevant plastic
moment of the beam.
Note
The student shall work similar problems for practice with two and three span
continuous beams with different support and loadings. If required BMD and SFD can be
drawn. If end supports are fixed, plastic hinges are formed and the span behaves as fixed
beam.
Sometimes, the value of MP will be given for each span and the collapse load will
be required to be calculated. In such problems, the collapse load is worked for each span
and the lowest load is chosen as the true collapse load.
Design of Tension Members
*
Dr. S. RAVIRAJ
Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering
Sri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering, Mysore – 06
1.0 Introduction
The Tension member considered for the design is a linear member which
carries an axial pull. The members undergo extension due to this axial pull. This
is one of the common types of force transmitted in the structural system.
Tension members are very efficient since the entire cross section carries
uniform stress unlike flexural members. The tension members do not buckle
even when stressed beyond the elastic limit. Hence the design is not effected
by the type of section used i.e., Plastic, Compact or Semi-compact. Some of the
common examples of tension members in structures are; Bottom chord of pin
jointed roof trusses, bridges, transmission line and communication towers,
wind bracing system in multi-storey buildings, etc.
The tension members may be made of single structural shapes. The standard
structural shapes of typical tension members are:
Single angle members are economical but the connection produces eccentric
force in the member. These are generally used in towers and in trusses. Double
angle members are more rigid than single angle members. They are used in
roof trusses. Since there exists a gap of about 6 to 10 mm between the two
members (which depends on the thickness of the gusset plate), they are
generally interconnected at regular intervals so that they act as one integral
member. In the members of bridge trusses the tensile forces developed are
very large and hence require more rigid members. In these structures single
channel, single I-section, built-up channels, or built-up I-sections will be
generally used.
Apart from strength requirement, the tension members have to be checked for
minimum stiffness by stipulating the limiting maximum slenderness ratio of the
member. This is required to prevent undesirable lateral movement or
excessive vibration. The slenderness limits specified in IS: 800-2007 for tension
members are given in Table 1.
The shear lag reduces the effectiveness of the component plates of a tension
member that are not connected directly to a gusset plate. The efficiency of a
tension member can be increased by reducing the area of such components
which are not directly connected at the ends. The shear lag effect reduces with
increase in the connection length.
Steel members (plates, angles, etc.) without bolt holes can sustain loads up to
the ultimate load without failure. However, the members will elongate
considerably (10 to 15 % of its original length) at this load, and hence make the
structure unserviceable. Hence the design strength Tdg is limited to the yielding
of gross cross section which is given by
Tdg = fy Ag /γm0
where
fy = yield strength of the material in MPa
Ag = gross area of cross section in mm2
γm0 = 1.10 = partial safety factor for failure at yielding
This occurs when the tension member is connected to the main or other
members by bolts. The holes made in members for bolts will reduce the cross
section, and hence net area will govern the failure in this case. Holes in
members cause stress concentration at service loads. From the theory of
elasticity, the tensile stress adjacent to a hole will be about two to three times
the average stress on the net area (Fig. 2a). This depends on the ratio of the
diameter of the hole to the width of the plate normal to the direction of the
stress.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 2 Stress-distribution in a plate adjacent to hole due to tensile force.
When the tension member with a hole is loaded statically, the point adjacent
to the hole reaches the yield stress fy first (Fig. 2b). On further loading, the
stress in other fibers away from the hole progressively reaches the yield stress
fy. Deformations of the member continue with increasing load until final
rupture of the member occurs when the entire net cross section of the
member reaches the ultimate stress fu (Fig. 2c).
where
p si2
An = b − n d h + ∑ t
i 4g i
ps
g
dh
g
b
g
where
β = 1.4 – 0.076 (w/t) (fy /fu) (bs /Lc ) ≤ (fu γm0 / fy γm1)
≥ 0.7
where
w w
w1
bs = w + w1 - t bs = w
Fig. 4 Angles with single leg connections
Tdn = α An fu /γm1
where
α = 0.6 for one or two bolts, 0.7 for three bolts and 0.8 for four or more
bolts along the length in the end connection or equivalent weld
length
The tearing strength, Tdn, of the double angles, channels, I sections and other
rolled steel sections, connected by one or more elements to an end gusset is
also governed by shear lag effects. The design tensile strength of such sections
as governed by tearing of net section may also be calculated using equation in
6.2.3, where β is calculated based on the shear lag distance, bs taken from the
farthest edge of the outstanding leg to the nearest bolt/weld line in the
connected leg of the cross section.
A D
B C
Fig. 6 Block shear failure in angle with Fig. 7 Block shear failure of gusset plate
bolted connection in welded connections
The block shear failure is also seen in welded connections. A typical failure of a
gusset in the welded connection is shown in Fig. 7. The planes of failure are
chosen around the weld. Here plane B-C is under tension and planes A-B and C-
D are in shear.
The block shear strength, Tdb, of connection shall be taken as the smaller of
or
Avg, Avn = minimum gross and net area in shear along a line of transmitted
force, respectively (1-2 and 3–4 as shown in Fig. 8 and 1-2 as
shown in Fig. 9)
Atg, Atn = minimum gross and net area in tension from the bolt hole to the
toe of the angle, end bolt line, perpendicular to the line of force
(2-3 as shown in Figs. 8 and 9)
3
1 2
3
1 2
Fig. 8 Block shear failure in plate Fig. 9 Block shear failure in angle
The block shear strength, Tdb, shall be checked for welded connections by
taking an appropriate section in the member around the end weld, which can
shear off as a block.
Lug angles are short angles used to connect the gusset and the outstanding leg
of the main member as shown in Fig. 10. The lug angles help to increase the
efficiency of the outstanding leg of angles or channels. They are normally
provided when the tension member carries a very large load. Higher load
results in a larger end connection which can be reduced by providing lug
angles. It is ideal to place the lug angle at the beginning of the connection than
at any other position.
Lug Angle
Problem 1
Determine the design tensile strength of the plate 120 mm x 8 mm connected to a 12
mm thick gusset plate with bolt holes as shown in Fig. 11. The yield strength and
ultimate strength of the steel used are 250 MPa and 400 MPa. The diameter of the
bolts used is 16 mm.
Gusset 12 mm thick
Plate
30
60
30
30 60 60 30
Solution
The design tensile strength Td of the plate is calculated based on the following
criteria.
(i) Gross section yielding
The design strength Tdg of plate limited to the yielding of gross cross section Ag
is given by
Tdg = fy Ag /γm0
30
60
30
30 60 60 30
Fig. 12 Failure of plate in block shear
40
100 x 75 x8
60
30 50 50 50 50 50 12 75
Solution
The design tensile strength Td of the angle is calculated based on the following
criteria.
β = 1.4 – 0.076 (w/t) (fy /fu) (bs /Lc ) ≤ (fu γm0 / fy γm1)
Here fu = 400 MPa, fy = 250 MPa, γm1 = 1.25, and γm0 = 1.10
w = 75 mm, t = 8 mm, bs = (75 + 60 – 8) = 127 mm, Lc = 250 mm
Further, diameter of bolt hole = 20 + 2 = 22 mm.
Anc = (100 – 8/2 – 22) 8 = 592 mm2, Ago= (75 – 8/2) 8 = 568 mm2
Hence, β = 1.17. Since 0.7 ≤ β ≤ 1.41 , β = 1.17
40
30 50 50 50 50 50
Fig. 14 Failure of plate in block shear
75 x 75 x 6
75 6 75
Solution
The design tensile strength Td of the angles is calculated based on the following
criteria.
Tdn = α An fu /γm1
Design of bolts
Bolts are in double shear.
Hence, strength of single 20 mm dia bolt = 2 x 45.3 = 90.6 kN
For the strength of connection to be larger than the strength of member,
Number of bolts required = 384.15 / 90.6 = 4.24
Hence provide 5 numbers of 20 mm bolts. Hence the connection is safe.
Assume edge and end distances = 35 mm and pitch = 50 mm
35
35 50 50 50 50
Fig. 16 Failure of angle in block shear
Avg = 235 x 6 = 1410 mm2, Avn = (235 – 4.5 x 22) x 6 = 816 mm2,
Problem 4
Design a suitable angle section to carry a factored tensile force of 210 kN assuming a
single row of M20 bolts. The yield strength and ultimate strength of the material is
250 MPa and 410 MPa, respectively. The length of the member is 3 m.
Solution
Step 1:
Obtain the net area, An, required to carry the design load Tu from the equation
using the ultimate stress.
Tu = fu An / γm1
Here, Tu = 210 kN, fu = 410 MPa, and γm1 = 1.25
Therefore, An = 619.8 mm2
Increase the net area, An, by 25 percent to obtain the gross area.
Hence, Ag= 774.8 mm2
Step 2:
Obtain the gross area, Ag, required to carry the design load Tu from the
equation using the yield stress.
Tu = fy Ag /γm0
Step 3:
From steps 1 and 2,
Required gross area Ag,req. = 924.0 mm2 (max. value)
Select an angle 65 x 65 x 8 with Ag = 976 mm2 ( > 924.0 mm2)
Step 4:
The strength of 20 mm diameter bolts in single shear = 45.3 kN
Hence required number of bolts = 210/45.3 = 4.64
Provide 5 bolts at a pitch of 60 mm
Step 5:
The design strength Tdg of plate limited to the yielding of gross cross section Ag
is given by
Tdg = fy Ag /γm0
Here fy = 250 MPa, Ag = 976 mm2 and γm0 = 1.10
Hence Tdg = 221.80 kN
Step 6:
The design strength Tdn of angle governed by rupture of net cross sectional
area, An, is given by
Tdn =0.9 fu Anc / γm1 +β Ago fy /γm0
β = 1.4 – 0.076 (w/t) (fy /fu) (bs /Lc ) ≤ (fu γm0 / fy γm1)
Here fu = 410 MPa, fy = 250 MPa, γm1 = 1.25, and γm0 = 1.10
w = 65 mm, t = 8 mm, bs = (65 + 35 – 8) = 92 mm,
Lc = 4 x 60 = 240 mm
Further, diameter of bolt hole = 20 + 2 = 22 mm
Anc = (65 – 8/2 – 22) 8 = 312 mm2, Ago= (65 – 8/2) 8 = 488 mm2
Hence, β = 1.26. Since 0.7 ≤ β ≤ 1.44 , β = 1.26
Hence, Tdn = 231.85 kN
Step 7:
The design strength Tdg of connection shall be taken as smaller of
Step 8:
The tensile capacity of member ISA 65 x 65 x 8 with 5 bolts of 20 mm diameter
is the least of Tdg, Tdn and Tdb.
Step 9:
Check for stiffness.
L = 3000 mm, rmin = 12.5 mm
L/ rxx = 240 < 250
Hence the section is safe.
Problem 5
A single unequal angle 100 x 75 x 6 mm is connected to a 8 mm thick gusset plate at
the ends by 4 mm welds as shown in Fig. 17. The average length of the weld is 225
mm. Determine the design tensile strength of the angle if the gusset is connected to
the 100 mm leg. The yield strength and ultimate strength of the steel used are 250
MPa and 400 MPa.
4 mm, weld
100 100 x 75 x 8
Cz = 30.1
4 mm, weld
8 75
Fig. 17 Details of connection at end
Solution
The design tensile strength Td of the angle is calculated based on the following
criteria.
(i) Gross section yielding
The design strength Tdg of angle limited to the yielding of gross cross section Ag
is given by
Tdg = fy Ag /γm0
β = 1.4 – 0.076 (w/t) (fy /fu) (bs /Lc ) ≤ (fu γm0 / fy γm1)
Here fu = 400 MPa, fy = 250 MPa, γm1 = 1.25, and γm0 = 1.10
w = 75 mm, t = 6 mm, bs = 75 mm, Lc = 225 mm
Anc = (100 – 6/2) 6= 582 mm2, Ago= (75 – 6/2) 6 = 432 mm2
Hence, β = 1.20. Since 0.7 ≤ β ≤ 1.41 , β = 1.20
Hence, Tdn = 306.39 kN
Proportioning of weld
Tensile capacity = 229.55 kN, Capacity of 4 mm weld = 0.53 kN/mm
Hence,
Length of weld on upper side of angle = (229.55 x 30.1/100)/0.53
= 130 mm, say 140 mm
Length of weld on bottom side of angle = (229.55 x 69.9/100)/0.53
= 302.7 mm, say 310 mm
Problem 6
A tie member of a roof truss consists of 2 ISA 100x75x8 mm. The angles are
connected to either side of a 10 mm gusset plates and the member is subjected to a
working pull of 300 kN. Design the welded connection. Assume connections are
made in the workshop.
Solution
Step 1:
To obtain the thickness of weld:
Working Load = 300 kN
Factored Load = 300 x 1.5 = 450 kN
At the rounded toe of the angle section,
L1 6 mm, weld
Cxx = 31 mm Cxx
ISA 10075, 8 mm
L2
Fillet at rounded end
Solution
Step 1:
Obtain the tensile design strength of each channel:
For ISMC 250, [from steel tables]
Thickness of weld = 7.1 mm
Thickness of flange = 14.1 mm
Sectional area = 3867 mm2
Tensile design strength of each channel = Ag fy/ 1.1
= 3867 x 250 /1.1
= 878864 N
Step 2:
Obtain the weld thickness:
Minimum thickness = 3 mm
Maximum thickness = 0.7 t =0.7 x 7.1 = 4.97 mm
Provide s = 4 mm weld.
Throat thickness, t = 0.7 x 4 = 2.8 mm
Step 3:
Obtain the strength of weld:
Weld strength = (Lw t fu/√3) x 1 / γ mw
= Lw x 2.8 x (410/√3) x 1/1.25
Equating strength of weld to tensile strength of the channel, we get
Lw x 2.8 x (410/√3) x 1/1.25 = 878804
i.e, Lw = 1658 mm
Since allowable length is limited to 400 + 400 mm it needs slot weld. The
arrangement can be as shown in the Fig.19 with slots of length ‘x’. Then
400 + 400 + (250-2x30) + 4x = 1658
i.e., x = 167 mm
Provide x = 170 mm as shown in the Fig. 19.
4 mm, weld
60
30
x 70 250
ISMC 250 30
60
Gusset Plate
Problem 8
A single angle member carries a factored axial force of 400 kN. Design the member
and the connection with a gusset plate and a lug angle. The yield strength and
ultimate strength of the material is 250 MPa and 410 MPa, respectively.
Solution
Sizing of Single Angle
Factored load = 400 kN
For preliminary sizing of single angle use the relation (Cl. 6.3.3 of IS 800 : 2007)
where Tdn = 500 kN, α = 0.8 ( ≥ 4 bolts), fu = 410 MPa and γm1 = 1.25
Hence, Required net area is An = 1524.4 mm2
The gross area is arrived by increasing the net area by 15% (say)
Therefore, Required gross area is Ag = 1753.1 mm2
Therefore provide ISA 125 x 75 x 10
Hence actual gross area Ag = 1902 mm2
Here, the 125 mm side is connected to the gusset and 75 mm side is the outstanding
leg.
The design strength Tdg of angle limited to the yielding of gross cross section Ag is
given by
Tdg = fy Ag /γm0
where Tdn = 176.64 kN, α = 0.8 ( ≥ 4 bolts), fu = 410 MPa and γm1 = 1.25
Hence, Required net area is An = 673.17 mm2
The gross area is arrived by increasing the net area by 15% (say)
Therefore, Required gross area is Ag = 774.15 mm2
Therefore provide ISA 75 x 75 x 8
Hence actual gross area Ag = 1140 mm2
Design of connections
Assume one row of 20 mm diameter bolt. Use a pitch of 2.5 x 20 = 50 mm, and an
edge distance of 30 mm (Cl. 10.2.2 and Cl. 10.2.4.2 of IS 800 : 2007)
Strength of 20 mm bolt in single shear = 45.30 kN
Load carried by the connecting leg of the main member is proportional to its area in
comparison with the total area.
Gross area of connected leg = [125 – (10/2)] x 10 = 1200 mm2
Hence, load carried by connecting leg = (1200/1902) x 400 = 252.37 kN
Required number of 20 mm bolts = 252.37/45.30 = 5.57, say 6 nos.
b) Connection of lug angle with gusset
Gusset
Main angle
ISA 125x75x10
Lug angle
ISA 125x75x10
Fig. 20 Details of connection of main angle with lug angle and gusset
9.0 References
The above member has a friction less hinge at each end, its lower end being fixed
in position while its upper end is free to move vertically but prevented from
deflecting horizontally. It is assumed that the deflections of the member remain
small.
d2y
EI = −P y (1)
dx 2
π 2 EI y
PE = (2)
l2
π 2E
pE = (3)
(KL / r )2
Strut with initial curvature
In practice, columns are generally not straight and the effect out of straightness on
strength is studied. Consider a strut with an initial curvature bent in a half sine
curve as shown in Figure.
If the initial deflection, at x from A is yo and the strut deflects ‘y” further under
load, P, the equilibrium equation is
d2y
EI = P( y + yo ) (4)
dx 2
πx
Where deflection y = sin (5)
l
δ0
δ= (6)
(PE / P ) − 1
The maximum stress at the centre of the strut is given by
i.e.
P(δ 0 + δ )h
p y = pc + (8)
Ary 2
i.e. p y = pc + pc
(δ 0 + δ )h (9)
ry 2
pc h 1
p y = pc + δ 1 +
2 0
(10)
ry ( p E pc ) − 1
δ 0h
η= (11)
ry 2
pc
(p − pc ) = ηp c 1 + (12)
( p E pc )
y
On simplification it gave
( p E − pc )( p y − pc ) = ηp E pc (13)
The value of pc, the limiting strength at which the maximum stress equal the
design strength, can be found by solving this equation and η is the Perry factor.
(
pc = φ ± φ 2 − p E p y )0.5
(14)
δ 0h
and η = (16)
ry2
the initial deflection δ 0 is taken as (1/1000)th of length of the column and hence
η is given by
l h l h
η = 2 = (17)
1000 ry ry 1000ry
l
and hence η = α (18)
ry
l
and ζ = (19)
r
y
η = 0.001a (ξ − λ0 ) (20)
π 2E
and λ0 = 0.02
(21)
f
y
the value of λ0 gives the limit to the plateau over which the design strength py
controls the strut load. The Robertson’s constant ‘ a ’ is assigned different values
to give the different design curves.
As per IS 800-2007;
fy fy
f cd = χ ≤ (22)
γ mo γ mo
And χ = stress reduction factor for different buckling class, slenderness ratio and
yield stress.
1
χ= (23)
[φ + (φ 2
− λ2 ) 0.5
]
fy
λ= (25)
f cc
π 2E
and f cc Euler’s buckling stress = (26)
(KL / r )2
KL
and effective slenderness ratio (or) the effective length KL to appropriate
r
radius of gyration, r, γ mo = partial safety factor for material strength. It is noted
that the stress reduction factor χ depends on buckling class, slenderness ratio and
yield stress (Table 8, P36- 39, IS800-2007).
λe = k1 + k 2 λvv2 + k 3λφ2
λφ =
(b1 + b2 ) / 2t = (130 + 130) / 2(10) = 0.146
π 2E π 2 x 2 x10 5
ε 1
250 250
φ = 0.5[1 + α (λ − 0.2 ) + λ2 ]
[
= 0.5 1 + 0.49(1.772 − 0.2 ) + 1.772 2 = 2.455 ]
f y γ mo 250 1.1
f cd = =
φ + [φ − λ ]
2 0 .5
[ ]
2 0.5
2.455 + 2.455 2 − 1.772 2
f cd =
(250 1.1) = 54.71N / mm 2
4.154
54.7 x 2506
Pd = = 137 kN
1000
k1 = 0.20, k 2 = 0.35, k 3 = 20
l / rvv
λvv = = 1.107
π 2E
ε
250
λφ =
(b1 + b2 ) / 2t = 0.146
π 2E
ε
250
f y γ mo 250 1.1
f cd = =
φ + [φ − λ ]
2 0 .5
[ ]
2 0.5
1.211 + 1.2112 − 1.012 2
φ = 0.5[1 + α (λ − 0.2 ) + λ2 ]
[
0.5 1 + 0.49(0.012 − 0.2 ) + 1.012 2 = 1.211 ]
f y γ mo 227.27
f cd = = = 137.45 N / mm 2
φ + [φ 2 − λ ]
2 0.5 1.211 + 0.683
2506
Pd = 137.45 x = 344.4kN
1000
2. 6
f cd = 107 − x12.4 = 103.8 N / mm 2
10
103.8 x 4312
Strength of the member = = 447.6kN
1000
le 2975
= = 116.2
rmin 25.6
6.2
f cd = 94.6 − x10.9 = 87.87 4 N / mm 2
10
87.84 x 4312
Safe load = = 378.8kN
1000
Ex.5 A rolled steel beam ISHB 300 @ 58.8 kg/m is used as a column. The
column is fixed in position but not in direction at both ends. Determine the
safe load carrying capacity in the section if the length of the column is 4.5m
h 300
= = 1. 2
b 250
γ Z = 129.5mm
γ y = 54.1mm
2
4500
= 250 (π 2
)
x 2 x10 5 = 0.391
129.5
φ = 0.5[1 + α (λ − 0.2 ) + λ2 ]
( [ (
f cd = f y γ mo φ + φ 2 − λ2 )0.5
])
250
= ( 2
0.5965 + 0.5965 − 0.391
2
)
0.5
1.10
f cd = 237.9 N / mm 2
2
4500
= 250 π 2 x 2 x105 = 0.9366
54.1
φ = 0.5[1 + α (λ − 0.2 ) + λ2 ]
[ ]
= 0.5 1 + 0.34(0.9366 − 0.2 ) + 0.9366 2 = 1.0638
f cd =
250
1.10
( (
1.0638 + 1.0638 2 − 0.9366 2 )
0.5
)
f cd = 356.42 N / mm 2
kL 4500
= = 34.75
r 129.5
4.75
f cd = 220 − x7 = 216.7 N / mm 2
10
kL 4500
= = 83.2
r 54.1
3.2
f cd = 150 − x16 = 144.48
10
50 x13 2
I zz = 2[15082.8] + 2 + 50 x1(20 + 0.5)
12
4
= 72198.9cm
1x50
[ ]
I yy = 2 504.8 + 62.93(10 + 2.42 ) + 2
2
12
= 41257.6cm 4
I min = 41257.6cm 4
41257.6
rmin = = 13.5cm
225.86
kL 5000
= = 37
r 135
7
f cd = 211 − x13 = 201.9 N / mm 2
10
201.9 x 22586
Safe load = = 4560kN
1000
A = 2(53.66 ) = 107.32cm 2
I zz = 2(10008) = 20016cm 4
[
I yy = 2 430.6 + 53.66(17.5 − 2.44 )
2
]
= 25201.7cm 4
I min
rmin = = 13.6cm
A
kL 700
= = 51.2
r 13.6
Table 9c
1. 2
f cd = 183 − x15 = 181.2 N / mm 2
10
181.2 x10732
Strength of the member = = 1944.6kN
1000
Area = 9128mm2
From SP (6)
γ min = 11.66cm
kL 390
= = 33.4
r 11.66
206.6 x9128
Safe load carrying capacity = = 1885.8kN
1000
A = 4(15.05) = 60.2cm2
[
I x = 4 87.7 + 15.05(18 − 2.34 )
2
]
= 15113.98cm 4
I min
γ min = = 15.85cm
A
kL 5000
= = 31.5 Buckling class ' c'
r 158.5
1. 5
f cd = 211 − x13 = 209.05 N / mm 2
10
209.05 x6020
Safe load = = 1258.5kN
1000
f y = 250 N / mm 2
h 300
= = 1.2
bf 250
t f = 10.6 ≤ 40mm
kL
= 23.17
r
3.17
f cd = 224 − x13 = 219.9 N / mm 2
10
kL 3000
= = 55.45
r 54.1
5.45
f cd = 194 − x13 = 186.9 N / mm 2
10
186.9 x7485
Design Strength = = 1398.9kN
1000
λe = k1 + k 2 λ2vv + k3λφ2
λvv =
(l
rvv )
=
(0.85 x275 / 1.95) = 119.87
ε πE / 250 π 2 x 2 x105 0.1986
1
250
λφ =
(b1 + b2 / 2t ) = (90 + 90) / 2 x8
π 2E π 2 x 2 x10 5
ε 1
250 250
λe = 1.768
f y / γ mo 250 / 1.1
f cd = = = 38.57 N / mm 2
φ + [φ − λ 2
]
2 0.5
[ 2
2.25 + 2.25 − 1.768 ]
2 0.5
38.57 x1379
Pd = = 53.18kN < 80kN
1000
k1 = 1.25; k 2 = 0.5, k3 = 60
λvv =
l / rvv
=
(0.85 x 275) / 1.94 = 120.49
π E 2
π 2 x 2 x105 88.81
ε 1x
250 250
λvv = 1.36
λφ =
(100 + 100) / (2 x10) = 100
= 0.1126
2
π x 2 x10 5 88.81
1x
250
φ = 3.756
f cd =
(250 / 1.1) = 32 N / mm 2
[
3.756 + 3.756 + 1.713 2
]
2 0.5
32 x1903
Pd = = 61kN < 80kN
1000
λe = k1 + k 2 λ2vv + k3λφ2
k1 = 1.25; k 2 = 0.5, k3 = 60
λvv =
l / rvv
=
(0.85 x 275) / 1.94 = 2.63
2
π E π 2 x 2 x10 5
ε 1x
250 250
f cd =
(250 / 1.1) = 31.26 N / mm 2
[
4.047 + 4.047 + 2.448 2
]
2 0.5
3126 x 2506
Pd = = 78.33kN < 80kN
1000
A=29.03cm2
rvv = 2.93cm
λe = k1 + k 2 λ2vv + k3λφ2
k1 = 1.25; k 2 = 0.5, k3 = 60
λvv =
l / rvv
=
(0.85 x 275) / 2.93 = 0.898
2
π E π 2 x 2 x105
ε 1x
250 250
λφ =
(150 + 150) / (2 x10) = 15
= 0.168
π 2 x 2 x10 5 88.81
1x
250
λe = 1.25 + 0.5(0.898) 2 + 60 x0.1463 2 = 1.83
f cd =
(250 / 1.1) = 51.84 N / mm 2
[
2.574 + 2.574 − 1.83 2
]
2 0.5
Strength = 150.5kN>80
λφ =
(130 + 130) / (2 x10) = 13
= 0.1463
2
π x 2 x10 5 88.81
1x
250
f cd =
(250 / 1.1) = 43.89 N / mm 2
2.415 + 2.415 + 1.752[ 2
]
2 0.5
Ex.12 Design a double angle discontinuous strut to carry a load of 125kN, the
length between the intersection is 3.8m
γ min = 2.3cm
kL
= 140.4
rmin
66.2 x1732
Safe strength = = 114.7kN < 125kN
1000
γ min = 2.44cm
kL 323
= = 132.4
rmin 2.44
2.4
Table 9(c) f cd = 74.3 − x8.1 = 72.4 N / mm 2
10
Ex.13 A column connects four equal angles arranged in the form of a square
section of side 400mm. Design the section if the column is to carry an axial
load of 800kN. The length of the column is 5m. Both the ends of the column
are restrained in position but not in direction.
[ ]
I x = I y = I min = 4 473.8 + 29.82(20 − 3.66 ) = 33742cm 4
2
33742
γ min = = 16.82cm
4 x 29.82
kL 500
= = 29.7
rmin 16.82
f cd = 211.39 N / mm 2
[ ]
I min = 4 207 + 22.59(20 − 2.92 ) = 27188.4cm 4
2
27188.4
rmin = = 17.35cm
4 x 22.59
kL 500
= = 28.8
rmin 17.35
f cd = 212.56 N / mm 2
[ ]
I min = 4 126.7 + 17.03(20 − 2.59 ) = 21154.5cm 4
2
21154.35
rmin = = 17.62cm
4 x17.03
kL 500
= = 28.4
rmin 17.62
8. 4
f cd = 224 − x13 = 213.08 N / mm 2
10
[ ]
I min = 4 87.7 + 15.05(20 − 2.34 ) = 19125.7cm 4
2
rmin = 17.82cm
kL 500
= = 28
rmin 17.82
8
f cd = 224 − x13 = 213.6 N / mm 2
10
Safe load = 213.6x4x1505/1000=1285.2>800kN
Try 4 angles of ISA 80x80x8 A = 12.21cm2
[ ]
I min = 4 72.5 + 12.21(20 − 2.27 ) = 15642.99cm 4
2
rmin = 17.89cm
kL 500
= = 27.95
rmin 17.89
7.95
f cd = 224 − x13 = 213.67 N / mm 2
10
[ ]
I min = 4 34.8 + 11(20 − 1.85) = 14633.79cm 4
2
rmin = 18.24cm
kL 500
= = 27.41
rmin 18.24
7.41
f cd = 224 − x13 = 214.38 N / mm 2
10
[ ]
I min = 4 29 + 8.96(20 − 1.77 ) = 12026.8cm 4
2
kL 500
= = 26
rmin 19.17
6
f cd = 224 − x13 = 216.2 N / mm 2
10
Ex.14 A rolled steel beam ISHB 300@ 58.8kg/m is used as a column. The
column is fixed in position but not in direction at both ends. Determine the
safe load carrying capacity of the section if the length of column is 4.5m
I zz = 12545.2cm 4
I yy = 2193.6cm 4
A = 74.85cm2
h 300
= = 1.2, t f = 10.6mm < 100mm
b f 250
12545.2
rzz = = 12.95cm
74.85
le 450
= = 34.75
rzz 12.95
4.75
f cd = 216 − x10 = 211.25 N / mm 2
10
2193.6
ryy = = 5.41cm
74.85
le 450
= = 83.18
ryy 5.41
3.2
f cd = 136 − x10 = 131.2 N / mm 2
10
About zz axis
le 600
= = 43.92
rzz 13.66
3.9
f cd = 198 − x15 = 192.15 N / mm 2
10
About yy axis
le 600
= = 39.34
ryy 15.21
9. 4
f cd = 211 − x3 = 208.18 N / mm 2
10
le 600
= = 50
rzz 11.98
0.17
f cd = 211 − x13 = 210.78 N / mm 2
10
le 600
= = 39.17
ryy 15.32
Cl 7.6.2 Minimum width of lacing bar = 3x16 (dia of bolt) = 48 say 50mm
Cl 7.6.5.1
Spacing of lacing
≤ 50
rmin of one component of member
l
≤ 0.7 e
rmin whole
(250 + 60 + 60) = 12.89 ≤ 50 ≤ 0.7(39.17 ) = 27.42
28.7
Cl 7.6.6.3
kL
≤ 145
r flat
2. 5
Shear force = x1000 = 25kN
100
S 25
Force on the lacing bar = cos ecθ = cos ec45 = 8.84kN
2n 2 x2
7
f cd = 83.7 − x9.4 = 77.15 N / mm 2
10
= (b − d )tf y / γ m =
(50 − 18)10(410 ) = 105kN
1.25
Ex.16 Design a battened column for the column shown in figure. Assume that
the channels are kept back to back.
kL
The effective slenderness ratio of battened columns shall be 1.1 times the
r
maximum actual slenderness ratio of the column.
kL
= 1.1x39.17=43
r
3
f cd = 198 − x15 = 193.5 N / mm 2
10
8422
Safe load = 193.5 x = 1629.7 kN > 1000kN
1000
Provide 20mm bolts. For rolled, machine flameout, P74, Cl 10.2.4.2 ⇒ 1.5xhole
diameter = 1.5x20=33mm
= 250+2(23.5)=297mm>2(100)=200mm
Design forces
Vt C 25000 x85
Longitudinal shear Vb = = = 28.72kN
NS 2 x370
Vt c 25000 x850
Moment M = = = 5312500 Nmm
2N 2 x2
250
Shear Stress = 28720/370x8=9.7N/mm2 < = 131.2 N / mm 2
3 x1.1
6 M 6 x5312500 250
Bending stress = 2 = 2
= 29.10 N / mm 2 < = 227 N / mm 2
td 8 x 370 1 . 1
Hence safe
Check
Force in each bolt due to shear = 28.72/3=9.57kN
M r
Force due to moment =
∑r2
5312500 x100
= = 26.56kN
100 2 x100 2
Hence safe.
f A
Pc = Ag + 0.45 cu pc ≥ Pcs
p y
f
Pcs = Ag + 0.25 cu Ac p y
py
Where Ac = gross sectional area of concrete. Casing in excess of 75mm from the
steel section is neglected. Finish is neglected.
Cased Column
A=6496mm2
rzz =10.91cm
ryy =5.49cm
ry = 0.2(325) = 65mm
≠ 0.2(250 + 150 ) = 80mm
bc2
iii) 100 =100x325=32500mm
dc
kL 3150
slenderness ratio = = = 48.46
r 65
25 185.3
Pc = 6496 + 0.45 x x105625 = 2084.5kN
250 1000
25 x105625 250
Pcs = 6496 + 0.25 x = 2284kN
250 1000
kL 0.8 x6000
= = 91.43
r 52.5
Yura suggested
Mz My
peff = P + 2 + 7.5 for initializing the size of the column. If the BM is
d b
predominant then the equivalent BM can be found out from
d
M eq = M z + Pu
2
In this case;
Mz 250
Peff = P + 2 = 500 + 2 x = 1333.33kN
d 0.6
h 600
= = 2. 4 > 1. 2
b 250
t c = 21.3mm < 40
1.43
f cd = 134 − x16 = 131.7 N / mm 2
10
Section properties
A = 177.38cm2
I zz = 1.06(10 ) cm 4
5
I yy = 47.7(10 ) cm 4
3
Z pz = 2bt t f (H − t t ) / 2 + t w (H − 2t f )/ 4
(P138, IS800:2007)
250 3 11.2 2
Z py = 2t f b 2f / 4 + (H − 2t f )t w3 4 = 2(21.3) + (600 − 2 x 21.3) = 683.1cm 3
4 4
Outstanding flanges
b 250 / 2
= = 5.87 < 9.4ε (Table 2, P18)
tf 21.3
Web
d 521.4
= = 46.6 < 84ε
tw 11.2
N My M
+ + z ≤ 1.0
N d M dy M dz
Ag f y
N d = design strength in compression =
γ mx
500 250
∴ + = 0.4 < 1.0
3872.3 906.05
kLz 4800
= = 19.22
rz 249.7
h 600
= = 2.4; t f = 21.3 < 40mm
b 250
9.22
f cd = 227 − x1 = 226 N / mm 2
10
Buckling about minor axis (Buckling class ‘b’)
1.43
f cd = 134 − x16 = 131.7 N / mm 2
10
131.7 x17738
Safe compressive strength = = 2336kN > 500kN
1000
M d = β b Z p f bd
0.5
1.1π 2 E
2
1 LLT / ry
f cr ,b = 1+
(LLT ry ) 20 h f / t f
2
LLT
= 91.43
ry
0.5
1.1π 2 x 2 x10 5 1 91.43
2
f cr ,b = 1 +
91.43 2 20 600 / 21.3
= 259.48[1 + 0.527 ]
0.5
= 320.64 N / mm 2
fy 250
= = 0.883
f cr ,b 320.64
[ (
Strength reduction factor = 0.5 1 + 0.21 0.883 − 0.2 + 0.863 2 )]
φ LT = 0.96
1
=
2 2
φLT + φLT − χ XL
1
χ LT = = 0.748
0.96 + 0.96 2 − 0.853 2
fy 250
f bd = χ LT = 0.748 x = 170 N / mm 2
γ mo 1.1
M cr = β b Z p f cr ,b
Hence it is safe
P
k Z 1 = 1 + (λ − 0.2 )
Pdz
500
= 1 + 0.883 − 0.2 = 1.146
2336
P 500
k ZZ = 1 + 0.8 = 1 + 0.8 X = 1.171
Pdz 2336
C mz = 0.6
P M 250
+ k z C mz 1 = 0.21 + 1.146 x0.6 x = 0.34 < 1
Pdz M cr 1278.3
Hence the section is safe against bending moment and axial force.
1. Design a single angle discontinuous strut (equal & unequal angle) to carry a
compressive force of 500kN. The c/c distance between the joints is 3m.
Design also the connections using
a) M24 bolts of property class 5.6
b) M24 HSFG bolts of property class 10.9
c) Equivalent welded connections
2. Repeat the above problem using double angles (on same side & on either side
of gusset plate) for a force of 1000kN.
3. A discontinuous double angle strut is placed back to back on the same side of
the gusset plate 8mm thick. The angles are ISA 125x95x8 with c/c distance
between the joints =3m. Calculate the safe load when:
a) connected by one bolt at each end
b) connected by two or more bolts at each end
What will the % change of load if the above angles are placed on either side of
the gusset plate?
5. A truss member has a length of 3.5m between the centre of joints. The force in
the member is 150kN compression due to DL & IL; 200kN due to DL & WL.
Design the member and the connection to a 10mm thick gusset plate. Adopt
single equal angle; single unequal angle; double equal angles & double
unequal angles.
7. Design a builtup column to carry an axial load of 1400kN with the length of
column being 8m. The column is effectively held in position at both ends, but
not restrained against rotation at both ends. The C/S of the column is:
b) Repeat the design in 7a) with two channels back to back with a clear
spacing of 300mm between them.
9. Design a suitable slab base and gusset base in problems (6) & (7) assuming
plain concrete pedestal of grade M15. Design the pedestal also. Adopt suitable
bolts. SBC of soil is 150kN/m2.
10. Design a column using an ISHB section with cover plates to carry a
compressive load of 3000kN. The effective length of the column is 6m. Also,
design a suitable gusset base & plain concrete pedestal of M15 grade. Adopt
suitable bolts. SBC of soil is 200kN/m2
11. An upper storey column ISHB300 @ 58.8 kg/m carries a load of 1000kN & a
BM of 40kNm. It is spliced with a lower storey column ISHB400 @ 82.2
kg/m. Ends of the columns are machined. (Milled) Design a suitable splice.
Adopt suitable bolts or welds.
12. a) A column section ISHB400 @ 82.2 kg/m carries an axial load of 1200kN &
BM of 50kNm. Design a suitable column splice. Adopt bolts or welds of
suitable size.
b) Design a suitable splice for a 5m effective length ISHB450 @ 87.2 kg/m
column carrying an axial load of 1000kN & a BM of 50kNm. Assume the
surfaces to be unmilled. Adopt bolts or welds of suitable size.
14. Two secondary beams ISMB300 @ 58.8kg/m are directly welded on either
side of the web of the girder ISMB600 @ 122.6 kg/m. Each secondary beam
transfer an end reaction of 250kN. Design fillet field welded connection.
15. Repeat the above problem as a framed connection adopting bolts or welds of
suitable size.
17. A stanchion factorial axial load of 750kN and factored Bending moment of
300 kNm. The effective length of the column is 5 m. Design the stanchion as
per IS 800:2007
18. A column of effective length 6.5m shown in fig is subjected to the design data
as follows.
19. A column between the floor is provided with ISHB 300 @ 58.8kg/m.
Investigate its adequacy if the ultimate design loads and moments are as
follows
Axial compression = 2500kN
Ultimate Moments at Top
About Major axis = 350kNm
About Minor axis = 50kNm
Ultimate Moments at Bottom
About Major axis = 175kNm
About Minor axis = -75kNm
Effective length of the column = 6.0m
Dr. K.U.MUTHU*
A Steel column of effective height 5m has to transmit an axial load of 2000KN. Design the
gusseted base. The size of the column is ISHB450. Adopt M20 concrete.
Mxx=p x2
2
= 6.4(100=28)2
2
Mxx = 52428.8N-mm.
t=33.96mm
∴ t plate = 33.96-15
At X1 – X1:
Mxx = 129792
t1=53.44mm.
Due to approximation in boundary conditions;
Vdpb= 2.5kb x dt x fu
√3 γmb
We have e = 40 = 0.74
3do 54
fub= 1.0
fu
Contents
Introduction
Beam types
Maximum deflection
Design of Purlins
Introduction
Beams are structural elements subjected to transverse loads in the plane of bending
causing BMs and SFs. Symmetrical sections about z-z axis are economical and
geometrical properties of such sections are available in SP (6) The compression flange of
the beams can be laterally supported (restrained) or laterally unsupported (unrestrained)
depending upon whether restraints are provided are not. The beams are designed for
maximum BM and checked for maximum SF, local effects such as vertical buckling and
crippling of webs and deflection. Beams can be fabricated to form different types of c/s
for the specific requirements of spans and loadings. Section 8 shall be followed in the
design of such bending members.
Beams can be of different cross sections depending on the span and loadings and
are shown below -
C / S of Plate Girders
Simple I sections are used for normal spans and loadings with all the geometrical
properties available in IS 800 : 2007.
All the other sections indicated in the figure are built up sections. These sections
are used when the normal I sections become inadequate due to large spans and loadings.
These sections are also used due to other functional requirements.
I section with cover plates are used when the loads are heavy and the spans are
large. If the depth of the beam is restricted due to functional reasons, smaller depth I
sections with cover plates can be used Additional cover plates increases the lateral load
resistance with increase in IYY. The properties of ISMB and ISWB sections with cover
plates are available in SP (6). (ZPZ has to be obtained from calculations)
Two I sections with cover plates can be used when very heavy loads and spans act
on the beam. The properties of these sections are not available in SP (6) and have to be
calculated.
Two I sections placed one above the other are used when the loads are light with
large spans, where deflection is the main criteria. The properties of these sections are not
available in SP (6) and have to be calculated
Gantry girders are used in industrial buildings to lift loads and typical sections
used are indicated in the figure. The properties of these sections are available in SP (6),
(ZPZ has to be obtained from calculations)
Plate girders are used where the spans exceed 20m and the loads are heavy. The
properties of these sections are available in SP (6), (ZPZ has to be obtained from
calculations)
Box sections have large torsional rigidity and can be used as single cell, twin cell
or multi - cell sections. The openings are advantageously used for service lines.
Castellated beams are special sections fabricated from I sections and are used for
light loads and large spans. The openings are advantageously used for service lines.
In all built up beams, the fabrication cost is higher due to the provision of
connections between the elements.
Section Classification
There are four classes of section namely Plastic, Compact, Semi - Compact and
Slender sections as given in IS 800 : 2007. [cl. 3.7.2 pp - 17] For design of beams, only
Plastic and Compact sections are used.
A beam transversely loaded in its own plane can attain its full capacity (Plastic
moment) only if local and lateral instabilities are prevented.
Local buckling of beams can be due to web crippling and web buckling. They are
avoided by proper dimensioning of the bearing plate and through secondary design
checks. Flanges shall always satisfy the outstand to thickness ratio as per IS 800 : 2007 so
that local failures of flanges are avoided. Plastic and Compact sections are used.
Lateral buckling of beams is the out of plane bending and is due to compressive
force in the flange and is controlled by providing sufficient lateral restraint to the
compressive flange.
Lateral stability of beams is affected by span of the beam, moment of inertia and
the support conditions.
The local failure of flanges (plates) reduces the plastic moment capacity of the
section due to buckling and is avoided by limiting the outstand to thickness ratios as
given in IS 800: 2007.
The web of a beam is thin and can fail locally at supports or where concentrated
loads are acting. There are two types of web failure -
Web crippling causes local crushing failure of web due to large bearing stresses
under reactions at supports or concentrated loads. This occurs due to stress concentration
because of the bottle neck condition at the junction between flanges and web. It is due to
the large localized bearing stress caused by the transfer of compression from relatively
wide flange to narrow and thin web. Web crippling is the crushing failure of the metal at
the junction of flange and web. Web crippling causes local buckling of web at the
junction of web and flange.
For safety against web crippling, the resisting force shall be greater than the
reaction or the concentrated load. It will be assumed that the reaction or concentrated
load is dispersed into the web with a slope of 1 in 2.5 as shown in the figure
For concentrated loads, the dispersion is on both sides and the resisting force can be
expressed as
The web of the beam is thin and can buckle under reactions and concentrated
loads with the web behaving like a short column fixed at the flanges. The unsupported
length between the fillet lines for I sections and the vertical distance between the flanges
or flange angles in built up sections can buckle due to reactions or concentrated loads.
This is called web buckling.
For safety against web buckling, the resisting force shall be greater than the
reaction or the concentrated load. It will be assumed that the reaction or concentrated
load is dispersed into the web at 45° as shown in the figure.
For concentrated loads, the dispersion is on both sides and the resisting force can be
expressed as
The design compressive stress fcd is calculated based on a effective slenderness ratio of
0.7 d / ry , where d = clear depth of web between the flanges.
Design compressive stress in web, fcd for the above slenderness ratio is obtained from
curve, C (Buckling class C) (Table 9c, pp 42)
In simple theory of bending, plane sections remain plane before and after bending
require that no SF is present in the beam. But in practice, SF influences the bending stress
in the flanges and causes the section to warp. This results in non uniform distribution of
flexural stresses in the flanges with stress being greater at the junction of flange and web.
This is known as shear lag effect. In built up beams with wide flanges, this can be
considerable, while in normal simple I sections, it is negligible. Shear lag depends on the
width to span ratio and is specified in cl. 8.2.1.5 (pp - 53 and 54)
Distribution of compressive stress in the flange
Beams subjected to BM develop compressive and tensile forces and the flange
subjected to compressive forces has the tendency to deflect laterally. This out of plane
bending is called lateral bending or buckling of beams. The lateral bending of beams
depends on the effective span between the restraints, minimum moment of inertia (IYY)
and its presence reduces the plastic moment capacity of the section.
Beams where lateral buckling of the compression flange are prevented are called
laterally restrained beams. Such continuous lateral supports are provided in two ways -
ii) External lateral supports are provided at closer intervals to the compression flange
so that it is as good continuous lateral support.
Design of such laterally supported beams are carried out using Clauses 8.2.1.2,
8.2.1.3, 8.2..1.5, 8.4, 8.4.1, 8.4.1.1, 8.4.2.1 and 5.6.1 (Deflection) In addition, the beams
shall be checked for vertical buckling of web and web crippling. The design is simple,
but lengthy and does not involve trial and error procedure.
iii) A trial section having the appropriate plastic section modulus is adopted using IS 800
or SP (6) depending upon the type of section required. The section shall be plastic or
compact section.
iv) The beam shall be checked for shear lag and design bending strength as given in
cl. 8.2.1.5 and 8.2.1.2 (pp -53)
v) The beam is checked for deflection using appropriate formula depending on the type of
loadings.
vi) The section is checked for shear as given in cl. 8.4, 8.4.1 and 8.4.1.1. If VU ≥ 0.6 Vd
it is a case of high shear or otherwise low shear. For high shear, the design bending
strength is calculated from cl. 9.2
vii) The section is checked for web buckling and crippling using appropriate formula.
Beams subjected to BM develop compressive and tensile forces and the flange
subjected to compressive forces has the tendency to deflect laterally. This out of plane
bending is called lateral bending or buckling of beams. Lateral buckling of beams
involves three kinds of deformations namely lateral bending, twisting and warping. The
lateral bending of beams depends on the effective span between the restraints, minimum
moment of inertia (IYY) and can reduce the plastic moment capacity of the section.
Factors affecting lateral stability
Type of C/S - The lateral buckling strength can be improved by choosing an appropriate
c/s where IYY is large. Box sections satisfies this and also has large torsional rigidity as it
is a closed section. Open sections like I sections have low torsional rigidity and are more
susceptible to lateral instability. Cl 8.2.2 pp - 54 mentions that hollow sections need not
be checked for lateral buckling strength.
Support conditions - The lateral restraint provided depends on the restraint provided by
the supports. The effect of various support conditions is taken into account using the
concept of effective length as given in Table 15 - pp 58 for simply supported beams and
Table 16 - pp 61 for cantilever beams.
Effective length - This concept incorporates the various types of restraints to the flanges
and for simply supported beams Table 15 - pp 58 can be used. The same information for
cantilever beams is given in Table 16 - pp 61.
Behavior of beams
The actual behavior of beams depends on whether the beam is allowed to reach its
plastic moment capacity. If the beam is prevented from local and lateral buckling, the
beam reaches its full plastic capacity with plastic hinges formed at critical points of
maximum BM which has been described in plastic analysis.
If the beam is not restrained laterally, the beam can undergo elastic lateral
torsional buckling and can fail due to instability with large lateral deflections, rotations
and warping.
If the web is too thin, the beam can fail in shear due to diagonal compression.
The beam can also fail due to local effects such as web buckling, web crippling or
distortion of flanges if these effects are not considered in the design.
The presence of compression in the flanges causes lateral deflection (side sway)
along with rotation known as Lateral Torsional Buckling of Beams. The assumptions
made in the analysis are -
i) The beam is initially undistorted without residual stresses.
ii) The beam behaves elastically upto failure.
iii) The beam is subjected to pure bending in the plane of web
If lateral restraint is not provided to the compression flange, buckling of a beam
takes place about its minor axis, accompanied by twisting moment and warping. The load
at which the beam buckles will be much less than the load causing full plastic moment.
The design bending compressive stress is dependent on a factor called non - dimensional
slenderness ratio, λLT, which in turn is dependent on the elastic lateral torsional buckling
moment, Mcr. The value of Mcr can be obtained by solving a fourth order differential
equation.
The value of Mcr can b calculated using the equations given in cl. 8.2.2.1 pp -54
for doubly symmetric c/s and annex E (pp 128 -129) for c/s symmetrical about the minor
axis.
All the steps given in design of laterally supported beams shall be used here. Also,
The plastic section modulus required is increased by 25 - 50% . The design bending
strength is calculated using the appropriate provisions in the code for lateral supported
beams. Other checks like deflection, shear and local criteria will be same.
Design strength of laterally supported and unsupported beams
These are analysis problems where the strength of the beam is required. The
design strength will be based on flexural or bending strength and shear strength.
Bending strength of laterally supported beams are calculated using the provisions
given 8.2.1.2 (pp -53) by knowing the plastic section modulus Zpz
The shear strength of the c/s is obtained from cl. 8.4(pp -59).
Shear forces always exists with BMs and the maximum shear stress has to be
checked with the shear yield stress. Shear stresses can become important if the depth of
the beams are restricted and when beams are subjected to large concentrated loads near
the supports. The distribution of shear stress at limit state (plastic) is shown below -
The nominal shear yielding strength is based on the Von Mises yield criteria which
assumes wide and thin webs without any local failures. The shear strength is expressed as
τy = fyw / √3
fyw = yield strength of the web
Shear failure can occur due to excessive yielding of the web area if the shear
capacity is exceeded.
The beam will be a high shear condition if VU > 0.6 Vd and the moment capacity
of the section decreases and has to calculated using the provisions given in
cl. 9.2.2 pp - 70
Maximum Deflection
A beam may have adequate strength in flexure and shear and can be unsuitable if
it deflects excessively under the service loads. Excessive deflection causes problems in
the functioning of the structure. It can harm floor finishes, cause cracks in partitions and
excessive vibrations in industrial buildings and ponding of water in roofs. Cl.5.6.1,
5.6.1.1 and Table 6 gives relevant specifications with respect to deflection.
The beam size may have to be taken based on deflection, if the spans and
loadings are large. Typical maximum deflection formulae for simple loadings are given
below -
Example 1
Design a simply supported beam of span 8 m. The spacing of the beams are 4m with
thickness of RC slab =150 mm, floor finishes = 1.4 kN / m2 and light partitions = 1kN /
m2. The beam also carries a central concentrated load of 250 kN with all the loads being
characteristic loads. The beam is laterally restrained. with grade of steel being Fe 490.
Check the beam for deflection, shear, web buckling and crippling.
d / tw = (600 - 23.6 * 2) / 11.8 = 46.85 < 67ε < 58.32 (cl 8.4.2.1, pp -59) (OK)
Hence ISWB 600 @ 145.1 kg / m satisfies all the specifications and can be used for the
given problem.
Example 2
A floor plan has a series of secondary beams spaced at 2 m c/c supported on main beams
spaced at 12 m c/c. The main beams are supported on columns spaced at 12 m c/c. The
floor is used for commercial purpose. Design the main beam by assuming suitable loads.
The beam is laterally restrained. with grade of steel being Fe 490. Check the beam for
deflection, shear, web buckling and crippling.
NOTE -
The chosen section is heavier than ISLB 500 @ 75 kg/m and hence the design
bending strength will be satisfactory.
Other checks like shear lag effect, shear, web buckling and web crippling can be
satisfied on similar lines.
Reaction from each secondary beam = (8.9 * 2 + 1.23) * 12 = 228.36 kN say, 230 kN
Self weight of main beam = (Total load on the beam) / 350 = (230 * 5) / 300 = 3.8 kN/m
Single I section is not possible and it is proposed to provide I section with cover plates on
either side. Properties are available in Table XIV for ISMB and ISWB sections in SP - 6
ZEZ = ZXX)REQD = ZP)REQD / 1.14 = 9672 x 103 mm3
No section in Table XIV gives this value of IZZ. Adopt ISMB 600 @ 122.6 kg/m with
40mm thick plates.
0.6 * Vd = 822.3 kN
VU > 822.3 kN (High shear) Design bending strength has to be modified.
d / tw = (600 - 20.8 * 2) / 12 = 46.53 < 67ε < 59.22 (cl 8.4.2.1, pp -59) (OK)
ZP)fd = [(475 -12) * 40 * 320 + (210 - 12) * 20.8 * 289.6] * 2 = 14.24 x 106 mm3
The other checks for web buckling , crippling and shear lag can be calculated as earlier.
Example 3
A simply supported beam has an effective span of 8 m and the beam has a c/s ISWB 600
@ 145.1 kg/m. Calculate the design BM and the safe UDL, the beam can support. The
beam is laterally restrained against torsion but partially restrained against warping. The
grade of the structural steel is Fe 490.
The value of the Elastic Lateral Torsional Buckling moment, Mcr is calculated
using all the equations given in IS 800 : 2007
i) Mcr = √ { (π2 EIY) / (LLT)2 }* [GIt + (π2 EIw) / (LLT)2 ]} (cl. 8.2.2.1, pp 54)
E = 2 x 105 N/mm2, IY = 5298.3 x 104 mm4 ,G = 0.769 x 105 N/mm2 ( cl. 2.2.4.1 pp - 12),
βf = Ifc / (Ifc + Ift) = 0.5 ( for symmetrical sections about both the axis)
ii) Mcr = (π2 EIYhf) / [2 * (LLT)2] }* [1+ 1 / 20 { (LLT / ry) / (hf / tf)}2] 0.5
iii) fcr,b = (1.1π2 E) / (LLT / ry)2 * [1+ 1 / 20 { (LLT / ry) / (hf / tf)}2] 0.5
= 206.22 N/mm2
Each equation gives different values of Mcr and the procedure given in Annex E is more
accurate but lengthy and cumbersome.
Consider the third approach as it gives the least values required and simple. If more
accuracy is required, averaging can be done.
Mcr = 895.33 x106 N mm and fcr,b = 206.22 N/mm2 will be used in further calculations.
λLT = √ (fy / fcr,b ) = √ (330 / 206.22) = 1.265
Also, λLT ≤ √ [(1.2 * ZE * fY ) / Mcr] ≤ √ [(1.2 * 3854.2 x 103 * 330) / 895.33 x106
≤ 1.306
Adopt λLT = 1.265 ( > 0.4 Hence lateral buckling analysis required)
= 638.22 kNm
wSAFE * L2 / 8 = MSAFE
Relevant expressions for deflection are used based on the loadings. The moment of
Inertia required is calculated. .
A suitable section based on the above requirement is chosen and the design bending
strength, Md is calculated as in Example 3. This shall be greater than MU. If required the
section has to be modified for economy. Once the section is chosen, other checks shall be
using the effective span as in laterally supported beams.
Design of Purlins
Purlins are flexural members used in trusses to support the roof covering and
spans between the trusses. Purlins are provided on the top rafter (top chord) at all
the joints. The spacing of the purlins depends on the type of the roofing material and for
normal materials, it ranges from 1.4 to 1.8 m. The sections used for purlins are usually
angles (equal or unequal) as they are economical and variety of sections is available.
The new code do not provide the design specifications. Therefore the specifications as
per the old code IS:800 1984 is followed. Cl . 8.9 pp - 69 shall also be followed. Based
on IS : 875 Part 2, LL on inclined roofs shall be taken as -
LL = 0.75 - 0.02 / ° of the slope for slopes > 10° subjected to a minimum of 0.4 kN / m2
Design a suitable single angle purlin having AC sheets as covering with spacing of
trusses = 4.5m. Pitch of the truss is 1 in 5 with spacing of the purlins = 1.6m. Wind
pressure normal to the roof is 1,3 kN / m2. Span of the truss = 18m.
Load acting normal to the purlin = 1.194 * cos θ = 1.12 kN/m (DL + LL)
DL acting normal to the purlin = (0.17 * 1.6 + 0.1) = 0.37 kN/m (Downwards)
ZE)REQD = M / 0.66 fY = 3,46 x 106 / (0.66 * 250) assuming Fe410 grade steel
= 21 x 103 mm3 (21 cm3)