F-NC-174 Cas om (Elephant) Development Project - GOSP frehnostaa| usrarogon “AGIP Contract No MFI Jb No. F-174/010-04 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE 520 02 21270 PROCEDURE NO. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015-C1 CRITICALITY RATING CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE... 2.0 SCOPE. 7 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS... 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.0 PROCEDURE. 6.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 7.0 DISTRIBUTION... RRONNHHHD ATTACHMENT AQ CRITICALITY RATING CRITERIA. se ATTACHMENT A02_ SAMPLE CRITICALITY CALCULATION SHEET ATTACHMENT A03_ SAMPLE PROCUREMENT QUALITY PROGRAMME. 1 Page AGF Ot ENT PROJECT ement Team _| Team J me OLY | Mee Fe ADASA. Signature Sele Dete: eM se iL COMPANY UMITED Page 1 of 4 ——————— 01 | 10.03.09 | F.kunstein |W. Stumpf “| Dr. Suckut! | For Implementation Rev| Date Prepared Chocked ‘Approved | Desaipton of Revision OPRECTCRITICALITY RATING Revision C1, dated 21.07.2003 ndubaranse Procedure No. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015 Page 2 of 4 faa 1.0 2.0 3.0 34 32 40 PURPOSE, ‘The purpose of this procedure is to describe how Criticalty Ratings are calculated and assigned to equipment items/materials to be supplied for the LASMO Elephant Development Project - GOSP. The procedure also describes how Criticality Ratings determine the quality programmes to be applied during the procurement of such equipment. SCOPE This procedure relates to equipment items purchased for the LASMO Elephant Development Project- GOSP, DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITIONS Criticality The likelihood and severity of possible failures during the manufacture, transport, installation, commissioning or normal operation of a piece of equipment which is to be procured for the Project. These failures may relate to safety, function, cost, schedule impact or a combination of these factors. Criticalty Rating: Decision making process by a team of specialists to determine the effort to be expended in QA/QC activities based on assessing the criticality (q.v.) of the piece of equipment in ques- tion, QA Requirements (QAR): Is a listing of quality requirements linked to specific Criticality Ratings which the supplier or ‘sub-contractor must take into account when providing items within the scope of supply. ABBREVIATIONS. cR Criticality Rating PEM — - Project Engineering Manager PQM — = Project Quality Manager QAR — = Quality Assurance Requirements VDRL - Vendor Data Requirements List RESPONSIBILITIES The preparation, review and approval of the subject management procedure is described in Project Quality Management Pian GS-MO-Q-QA-00-001 section 7.0 ‘The PEM is responsible for the implementation and maintenance of and adherence to this procedure, GPROECTCRITICALITY RATING Revision C1, dated 21.07.2003 natn | Procedure No. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015 Page 3 of 4 Lowe) rch 5.0 51 52 53 54 55 PROCEDURE CRITICALITY RATING TEAM The Criticality Rating Team consists of: ‘+ the Discipline Lead Engineer + the Process Engineer * the Project Engineering Manager (Taking the lead) * the Project Quality Manager. CRITICALITY RATING CRITERIA Table 1 in Attachment AO1 of this procedure details the six criteria to be considered by the Criticality Rating Team when determining CR for equipment items. Each criterion is ‘sub- divided into four levels of severity with an appropriate points allocation from one to four. Although it is intended that subject criteria remain standard for the duration of the project, it may be necessary for Engineering to revise the criteria for individual cases to suit particular project circumstances. CALCULATION OF CRITICALITY RATINGS When awarding CR points, the CR Team shall consider the equipment against the six critical- ity rating criteria Reliability is implicitly included with the design maturity and complexity criteria because they are strongly correlated, l.e. high reliability is achieved by proven designs of minimal complex- ity. The criticality of poor reliabilty is included in criteria E and F. When the appropriate level has been selected against each criterion, the assigned point val- es, (1, 2, 3 or 4) shall be entered in the applicable boxes of the CR Calculation Sheet (Form LGM-EF-07-0, Attachment A02). The summation of awarded points shall be converted into a criticality rating level using Table 2 In Attachment A0t. ‘The CR Calculation Sheet shall be signed and dated by the CR Team. CRITICALITY RATINGS, fan override in CR is deemed necessary, then the revised value is to be entered in the over- ride.column under Section B of the CR Calculation Sheet, together with the reason for change. For example, a high score under Criterion E (Personal Safety) may warrant an over- ride in CR, PROCUREMENT QUALITY PROGRAMMES. Procurement Quality Programmes have been developed for all CRs. It is intended that such Programmes be used as a guide when completing the QA Requirements document (QAR). See Attachment A03 “Procurement Quality Programme” (Form LGM-EF-07-0) and Project Procedure GS-MO-Q-PR-00-016 Requisition Preparation - Vendor. GPROECTCRITICALITY RATING Revision C1, dated 21.07.2003 ‘ndurbnnonen Procedure No. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015 Page 4 of 4 cay rckitstan 56 87 60 7.0 The final QAR shall be produced by means of reprinting all applicable clause numbers identi- fled by the relevant Procurement Quality Programme. ‘The original CR Calculation Sheet shall be retained within the Project File and the PQM shall include the finalised QAR within the requisition, ensuring that the unique QAR number is in- serted on the document front sheet. For numbering of documents, refer to Section 5.6 of this procedure, To avoid any clashes of QA and/or QC requirements in the requisition package, the POM shall crosscheck the QAR with the related codes on the VDRL. ‘Any conflict must be resolved with the responsible lead engineer prior to release of the requi- sition package. The QAR, which is included as a separate document within the requisition package, shall be signed and dated by the originator prior to issue. NUMBERING OF CRITICALITY RATING CALCULATION SHEETS ‘The numbering of CR Calculation Sheets is the responsibility of the originating discipline en- gineer. ‘The number shall be the requisition number. NUMBERING OF PROCUREMENT QUALITY PROGRAMMES The numbering of the Procurement Quality Programme shall be the complete requisition number preceded the abbreviation “QAR™. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Procedures: GS-MO-Q-QA-00-001 Project Quality Management Plan GS-MO-Q-PR-00-016 Requisition Preparation - Vendor Forms: LGM-EF-07-0 Criticality Rating Calculation Sheet LGM-EF-06-0 Procurement Quality Programme LGM-EF-05-0 Technical Requisition (Cover sheet) DISTRIBUTION Originals (signed paper copies) of the procedure will be kept at DCC in Geisenheim Availability to project members as follows: * Geisenheim : Electronic files under H:\Project\Lasmo_gosp\Quality.pqm\Procedures * Site Office: Issue of controlled copy documents to Site DCC. GPROIEGTProcedure No. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015 Attachment A01, Page 1 of 1 F-NC-174 (Ga (Elephant) Development Project - GOSP FERROSTAAL| cm ue Y FI Job No Patraioto-o1 CRITICALITY RATING se Table 1 - Criticality Rating Criteria Points A DESIGN MATURITY: ‘+ Proven design used frequently Hl ‘© Modification to proven design... 2 + Extrapolation of proven design a ‘+ New, innovative... 4 B_ DESIGN COMPLEXITY: ‘© Design effort is minimal and simple 1 ‘© Design effort is significant and simple 2 © Design effort is significant with some complexity. 3 * Design effort is extensive andlor complex. sh © PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS: * Innocuous. ia 4 * Low hazard/toxicityitemperature/pressure. 2 ‘+ Medium hazard/toxicity/temperature/pressure... “8 + High hazarditoxicitytemperaturelpressure..... my MANUFACTURING COMPLEXITY: + Few simple processes 1 * Many simple processes... 2 + Alleast one complex process. 3 + Large number of complex processes... 4 E PERSONNEL SAFETY: ‘+ Norisk to health and safety 7 1 + Low risk to health and safety of operators. 2 + Significant risk to health and safety of operators. 3 Considerable risk to operator and/or public... 4 F FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCE - FAILURE WOULD RESULT IN: ‘+ Negligible cost. , oe 4 ‘© Small total cost, both di ‘consequential... 2 ‘+ Moderate total cost, both direct and consequential 3 * Excessive total cost, both direct and consequential 4 Total Points | Gritcality Rating | Level of Critcaty 2010.24 H Highest Level of Critcalty 18019 u . - toto 18 tl = 6109 v Lowest Level of Griteality _ @PROTS-CL-ADT 21.07-2003, foprocatachmentProcedure No. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015 Attachment A02, Page 1 of 1 F-NC-174 (Elephant) Development Project - GOSP eahhostan haste ‘Petraioi0-01 CRITICALITY RATING sree SAMPLE: CRITICALITY RATING CALCULATION SHEET @le |, it ‘t i ai HH EES iF S| i be lel [Pe i TBE If i A, i i | i Ha la i le a EI vie Use form LGM-Ef apRois.cr.acz 2.072003, Lomer-o7-0.0003Procedure No. GS-MO-Q-PR-00-015 Attachment A03, Page 1 of 4 F-NC-174 (Elephant) Development Project - GOSP (sos havent Tip Contact No: F-1741010-01 CRITICALITY RATING 82002 21270 ‘Sample: Procurement Quality Plan TURKMENNEFT / TURKMENISTAN Gas COMPRESSOR STATION KORPEDJE frckhostia “Tweennat ee ae PROCUREMENT QUALITY PROGRAMME ae Pant = Equipment ‘Requiston No. D0 Quarty's oF siGniricanT wPORTANCE Dt quatrry is oF MODERATE IMPORTANCE (DIV NORMAL COMMERCIAL QUALITY IS ACCEPTABLE Ths equpmet and rio eovared by bis purchase oder haa boon raed athe critcalyndcated above und maractoraoupply wl be subjected to re gusty rogram deated below es marked nine appleabe colunn tyou}miyv {sch soul be taken rt acsoun byte Vent) + |Paaras seers! vars Quy Stn Nay iavaveomctane | Pr-anar review of Vendors comporie GA Warval lay be waned Bared oa pe ? [css ator acerestedaptaier = = [3 |Fosceerdrevew of Vener pests Proje Guay Plan Oanval and POSE rsa aoc Ouay Pan [a | SubvendorGomiy an paso ln ecapanc by Purchane’s Spent Engcaae Design cats accarianos by Purchasers Sposa geet 5 [6 | Postewardyomnw oC epaion Pan 7 | Pretpecion mothe fe 2 als[sfs s [GC sono in arctan wh GS rapacon Pa Ge wape no poe winastod by Purchesar GO and Spat Engen [10 | Fost eward audio my be conducted by Puchavors Oh en Vendor Gnd SB VER fo) sfs{stsfstsfs]s s [i |r Senate hacka 7 72 | Fontona/paarmance tes wineeod by Pursans?s OG ard Speci ema | peer approves procedure [3 | Funcionl/pomance st Wapsiaie winsated by Purchase? GOT manctacre’s tot posse viv [inspection Release Crieat by Puchavers GS ra Aa 188 | Goring Aatoriyirdepandent Tad Pony desbn epporat Vondorcoat]_Purchauer Soa] (ek 7) 180 [Cerin Auorvindonedent Ti Party epecion suey Vendor Cost] Purchaser Gout] (kk 7) — eee ee — arin TSO RE Compressor Station Korpasie| 51002 10080 | | 4 | | tort OIRCTSEO arom prom POPSET areas Use form LGM-EF-06-0 QPRONS-Cr.A03 21.07.2008, LoM-EF 060-0308