The Nuremberg Code and Its Impact On Clinical Research
The Nuremberg Code and Its Impact On Clinical Research
Clinical Research
The Nuremberg Code is one of the most influential documents in the history of clinical
research.
Created more than 70 years ago following the notorious World War II experiments, this
written document established 10 ethical principles for protecting human subjects.
The Doctors’ Trial is officially titled “The United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al.,”
and it was conducted at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany. The trial was
conducted here because this was one of the few largely undamaged buildings that remained
intact from extensive Allied bombing during the war. It is also said to have been
symbolically chosen because it was the ceremonial birthplace of the Nazi Party. Of the 23
defendants, 16 were found guilty, of which seven received death sentences and nine received
prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. The other 7 defendants were
acquitted.
The verdict also resulted in the creation of the Nuremberg Code, a set of ten ethical principles
for human experimentation.
Good Clinical Practice is an attitude of excellence in research that provides a standard for
study design, implementation, conduct and analysis. More than a single document, it is a
compilation of many thoughts, ideas and lessons learned throughout the history of clinical
research worldwide.
Several other documents further expanded upon the principles outlined in the Nuremberg
Code, including the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report and the Common Rule.
Although there has been updated guidance to Good Clinical Practice to reflect new trends and
technologies, such as electronic signatures, these basic principles remain the same. The goal
has always been—and always will be—to conduct ethical clinical trials and protect human
subjects.