Background of the Study

Many students often overlook the importance of writing a research paper. They take it as a

burden. They don’t realize that it is an opportunity to acquire skills that will be essential to

whatever future career plans they may have especially now that the global context requires a

productive research culture that can work along with the newest trends in education. They seldom

remember that a research paper tests the student’s ability to search, collect information, write,

compile, analyze and interpret a topic. It is an amalgamation of their total learning. Yet, research

as a field is undervalued in the Philippines that is according to Senator Bam Aquino (2016), as the

new committee chairman on Science and Technology during the discussion on the proposed

Magna Carta for Scientist.

In the K to 12 Curriculum, academic writing is now a vital part of the continuous

summative assessments in most academic courses in the Senior High School. Senior High School

students are required to present write-ups of scientific inquiry process, draft experiments, business

concepts, marketing ideas, essay on current social issues, critique papers, project plans, livelihood

projects and other such summative assessments. More so, transparent in the Curriculum Guide for

Senior High School is the inclusion of the subjects Practical Research 1 – Qualitative Research,

Practical Research 2 – Quantitative Research and Inquiries, Investigations and Immersion that

require Senior High School students to master research writing and that Senior High School

teachers are indebted to discuss it in a more creative and interesting way. But soon after the opening

of classes, teachers would often observe that the previously thrill-filled classroom is painted with

boredom, passiveness and lack of interest and motivation when they start teaching the rigors of

research paper writing. It is also observed that Senior High School students, when given a topic

on research writing, are not confident and are unsettled to further the writing activity itself.
Sometimes, it is the reason of not being able to advance in terms of subject accomplishments that

may lead to getting a failing grade in a specific subject.

As a matter of fact, (Ganobscik & Williams, 2009), on their recent studies, highlighted that

academic writing plays a major role in higher education both in students’ understanding of the

course content and the consequent assessment of students’ knowledge. The academic staff was

aware of the importance of writing, with one survey highlighting that almost 90% of staff felt that

it was necessary to teach writing skills to students and maintaining standards of Academic Writing

has significant implications for both those teaching and learning in the higher education.

There is no better purpose for research than to elevate the eminence of humanity.

Furthermore, it sheds light to what students can do to cope with the advancement of trends in

education as a tool for individual and national development as a fundamental way in trailblazing

education
Preliminary Literature Review

In the theoretical framework, the students’ interest and ability to produce a scholarly

research output is highly affected by the teacher’s background in teaching research. That when

teachers are prepared with the skills in basic research, have a remarkable research culture and are

familiar with more strategies in teaching research, students will likely become more interested and

motivated in writing their academic papers and be able to produce a more scholarly output. The

framework elaborated that these factors are closely related with each other. When teachers utilize

more strategies to foster interest and confidence among the students, as an immediate conclusion,

they are prepared with the rudiments of basic research and that they have a notable research culture.

In the conduct of the study, the researcher is guided by the conceptual paradigm in Figure 1

presented as follows.

Students Research
Ability Output

Teachers

Preparedness of Research teaching

Diagram 1. Theoretical Framework

research role in the light of growth of higher education and changes to the organization of the sector in

many countries. Their article examines one strategy for research development: the use of writing groups.

It argues that writing is best seen as a starting point, rather than an endpoint, of the research process and

hence that fostering academic writing is a useful place to PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences

ISSN 2454-5899 Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 1791 do research development work.

Though it is a fact that the writing requirements and problems of Senior High School students have not

been targeted in writing survey research, in spite of the importance of writing in the lives of these

students.
Abridged Methodology

Research Design

The researcher utilized the Descriptive Method of research in the collection of data to make an

accurate presentation of a group due to the trait they possess. Descriptive Method, according to

Boholano (2016), determines and reports the way things are. The principal aims in employing this

method are to describe the nature of a situation as it exists at the time of the study, to explore the

causes of a particular phenomenon and to classify features, count them, and construct statistical

models in an attempt to explain what is observed.

Respondents

The respondents of this study are thirty (30) Senior High School teachers who are teaching research

schools.

Sampling Techniques

The researcher utilized the Purposive Sampling technique to determine the respondents of the

study. Calmorin & Calmorin (2007), stated that the purposive sampling is based on the selection

made by the researcher because of the good qualities that they possess which represent the group

they belong to.

Instruments Used

The researcher used a questionnaire as the main instrument to gather data needed to fulfill the

aims of the study.

4 days -Making of the research paper

1 week -Data collection

6 days -Data analysis

Diagram 2. Timeline of Tasks

The whole study takes 2 weeks and 3 days to be fully accomplished and is also divided into 3
parts: (1) making the partial of the research paper, (2)conducting the action plan of the data
gathering procedure, and (3) the critical analysis of data gathered together with its summary and
the overall conclusion of the study.
Objectives of the Study