Chipchase 2008
Chipchase 2008
Electrophysical agents have been a core part of physiotherapy practice since the establishment
of the profession. However, significant changes in the health arena over the last 20 years have
challenged the place of electrophysical agents as a core aspect of physiotherapy practice. The
development of manual techniques and a greater focus on exercise therapies and evidence
based practice have led to a shift in the way physiotherapists view and use electrophysical
agents. At the same time, the types and complexity of electrophysical equipment has increased
considerably. These changes create difficulties in determining which electrophysical agents
should be included in entry level physiotherapy curricula. Using electrophysical agents as an
example, this paper presents the challenges facing the profession in terms of what and how
decisions concerning entry-level physiotherapy curricula may be made. A framework for
integrating both clinical practice trends and research evidence is presented as a means for
determining entry level physiotherapy curricula in the next ten years.
Keywords: Electrophysical agents, evidence, curriculum, physiotherapy practice
affect curricular decisions, the relationship between by physiotherapists as an adjunct for patient manage-
practice and curricular content and the role of an ment and are included within standard texts on
evidence based framework in determining curricular EPAs.1–3
content are then presented. This is followed by
suggestions for the way forward, including a curri- EPAs as core in physiotherapy practice
cular framework that attempts to resolve the appar- Electrotherapy, the application of electrical and
ent discrepancies between clinical practice patterns, magnetic energy forms, was practiced as early as
research evidence and decision making of the content the eighteenth century, mainly by unqualified doctors
of entry level curricula. and charlatans.4,5 At this time, the types of currents
used were direct, alternating and faradic.6,7 In both
Electrophysical agents the UK and Australia, the use of electrotherapy
The term EPAs implies a number of electrical and gradually found its way into mainstream medical
physical agents. Electrophysical agents include four practice in the late nineteenth century, used by
main energy forms (thermal, acoustic, electrical and doctors or by medical electricians.8
electromagnetic) that can be applied to tissues for Electrotherapy faded away as a discrete entity in
therapeutic, diagnostic or feedback purposes.1–3 The medical practice at the turn of the twentieth century,
range of EPAs using these energy forms is listed in absorbed by its more successful partner, massage.8
Table 1. While biofeedback devices, such as electro- As in the UK, physiotherapy’s predecessor discipline
myography, are not an energy source, they are used in Australia was massage therapy. The first
Heat packs Therapeutic ultrasound Pulsed currents, Transcutaneous electrical Shortwave diathermy
nerve stimulation, Functional electrical stimulation,
faradic, High voltage galvanic stimulation
Ice (cold packs, Phonophoresis Interferential therapy Microwave
massage, sprays)
Contrast baths Russian current Ultraviolet
Whirlpool baths Direct current and iontophoresis Infrared
Hydrotherapy Magnetic fields
Fluidotherapy Low level laser
Wax baths Pulsed electromagnetic fields
physiotherapy education programmes commenced in influence practitioners’ views and usage of EPAs.
the early 1900s and included massage, exercise Without doubt, the dominant research paradigm
therapy and medical electricity.9 underpinning EBP is quantitative theory with rando-
Determining when different EPAs were incorpo- mised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews
rated into physiotherapy practice is difficult due to a (of RCTs) viewed as providing the highest levels of
lack of published literature particularly in the first half evidence.13,14 The lack of high quality research
of the twentieth century. Figure 1 presents the evidence is possibly why older EPAs such as short-
approximate times when different modalities came in wave diathermy and ultraviolet light, designed
to use. As the table shows, in the space of 100 years, and used clinically long before EBP, are little used
the number of EPAs available to physiotherapists has now.15–17
grown remarkably. New EPAs were added and Research evidence alone does not explain why
technological advances and the development of some EPAs are used and others not. This is
microprocessors have given rise to more multifunction highlighted by international differences in EPAs
modalities and computerised machines.1 While there usage patterns. If research evidence is available,
have been technological advances and increases in the accessible and disseminated equally well globally
number of EPAs, other global changes in health care then practice trends should vary little between
delivery appear to have led to a shift in how countries. Usage patterns for interferential therapy,
physiotherapists view and use EPAs. These changes common in Australia and England but comparatively
include the introduction of more manual techniques, a rare in the United States, show this is not true.16,18–22
greater focus on exercise therapies and EBP. This suggests that clinical practice trends are based
In the mid 1960s and 1970s, the number of manual on factors other than just research evidence.
and exercise based techniques used by physiothera-
pists increased. The philosophies of pioneers such as Electrophysical agents and entry level
Maitland, McKenzie and Karltenborn led to a new education
range of practical skills available to physiotherapists. Entry level curricula have expanded substantially as a
In addition, primary contact status for physiothera- result of the growth in knowledge, research and
pists was introduced in most developed countries, information technology without a concomitant
starting with Australia.10,11 These two changes increase in the length of entry level programmes.23
appear to have increased the focus on manual and This is exacerbated by uncertainties as to which skills
exercise based techniques skills among physiothera- and topics should be included for entry level
pists, particularly those in private practice who practitioners. Typically, physiotherapy programmes
appeared to select them in preference to EPAs.12 keep adding material while not subtracting any. The
The rapid growth of the EBP philosophy in the result is curricula hypertrophy in each stage and on
later part of the twentieth century also appeared to each topic, including EPAs.23–25
How then can planners of curriculum determine one addressed EPAs curricula and reported varia-
which EPAs should be covered in an entry level tions in content across programmes in Australia.26
programme and which should be ‘ignored’? As In terms of EPAs curricula, several modalities are
indicated earlier, the number and availability of now being deleted from Australian and New Zealand
modalities has increased in line with technical entry level programmes due to their lack of use in
advances. The more traditional forms of EPAs clinical practice.26 For example, use of shortwave
appear to be used less frequently. For example, diathermy, microwave and direct current is no longer
shortwave diathermy is rarely used in Australian taught. Academics responsible for EPAs curricula in
physiotherapy practice.16,19,22 However, ‘new trend’ Australia reported that a number of factors impacted
modalities such as real time ultrasound may also have on their choice of content: current clinical practice,
low prevalence but might be recommended for the research or evidence base for EPAs, registration
inclusion within entry level training on the belief that or accreditation requirements, safety, time, access to
this modality will become more rather than less equipment, tradition, legislation and personal clinical
popular.26 The number of EPAs currently available practice. However, the two most commonly cited and
precludes all being included in a curriculum without highest ranked factors were current clinical practice
sacrificing material on other topics. This raises the and research evidence. As these two factors appear to
question of how decisions surrounding curricular be the most important, there are two possible
content are made. methods for dealing with the curricular hypertrophy
in entry level curriculum. First, include only those
Factors influencing curricular decisions about modalities commonly used in clinical practice. Or
EPAs second, include only those modalities with a convin-
The content of a curriculum is thought to determine cing evidence base. The following sections explore
the discipline specific technical attributes (skills, whether a curriculum can be designed based on each
knowledge and abilities) to be gained from an premise.
educational programme.27,28 Despite this, there is
little peer reviewed published information on either The relationship between current clinical
the content of entry level physiotherapy curricula or practice and curricula
how relevant decisions are made. A systematic review While there have been over 23 studies concerning
of the literature located 19 peer reviewed publications physiotherapists’ use of EPAs, many are limited to
in the past 20 years on the content of entry level only one modality or to one small geographical area
physiotherapy programmes (Table 2). Of these, only (Table 3). Of the 10 studies that have investigated the
full range of EPAs used, most were limited to city or training, there are a number of potential issues with
state based samples or to physiotherapists in one this framework.
practice area. The only study which reported a Basing entry level curricula solely on clinical
national survey of all registered physiotherapists practice presents several risks for the physiotherapy
investigated the availability and use of a range of profession. First, there are international differences in
EPAs in Australia.47 the use of EPAs. If Australian entry level pro-
The study by Chipchase used a four point Likert grammes based curricula design on frequency of use
scale to measure the frequency of EPAs use.47 This in Australia, then new graduates from this country
national data (n53,538) showed that over 20% of may not be recognised or competent to work as entry
physiotherapists were likely to use the following nine level practitioners in other countries.
modalities on a yearly, monthly or daily basis: Second, this approach to designing curricula does
ultrasound, heat packs, ice/cold packs, interferential not necessarily reflect evidence that a modality
therapy, electrical stimulation for sensory and motor improves patients’ outcomes. This would not be a
stimulation, pressure and electromyographic biofeed- major concern if clinical practice was reliably under-
back and laser (Table 4). Consequently, one of every pinned by a research evidence base. However, the
five new graduates in Australia is likely to use these patterns of EPAs usage rates are not always
modalities in their first year following graduation. consistent with existing evidence or a research base.
These data suggest that these modalities should be Previous research has consistently demonstrated,
included in Australian entry level curricula because over time and in many different countries, that some
they are used relatively frequently. frequently used modalities have a limited research
The remaining 14 modalities investigated (wax, base such as interferential therapy.1 Conversely,
continuous and pulsed shortwave diathermy, infra- other EPAs with stronger evidential support are used
red, magnetic field, ultraviolet light, microwave, disproportionately less frequently, such as transcuta-
vapocoolant sprays, direct current, iontophoresis, neous electrical nerve stimulation. In an evidence
microcurrent, real time ultrasound, Russian current based health care climate, the need to justify using
and static magnets) could be excluded from entry specific clinical modalities and their inclusion in entry
level curricula unless their use becomes more level curriculum is increasingly important. This
frequent. However, this means that if curricula are means that evidence needed to justify the use of a
based on clinical practice, there is an ongoing need modality should be equivalently applied for both
for studies into the usage frequency of EPAs in curricular decisions and continued use in clinical
clinical practice. Concurrently, this list of 14 mod- practice.
alities could be included in continuing education or The third risk of including EPAs on the basis of
post professional courses and employers advised that, their current rates of use concerns new modalities.
if used locally, new graduates may require ‘on the job’ The introduction of a new modality or technique, if
training or supervision. While this option would well marketed, is likely to increase the level of initial
clarify for curricula planners and employers the use. For example, 45 kHz ultrasound was well
minimum requirements of EPAs within entry-level promoted prior to the publication of relevant
Table 4 Comparison of percentage of respondents’ frequency of use
Used by over 50% of participants on Used by over 20% of participants on a daily, Used by less than 20% of participants
a daily, monthly or yearly basis monthly or yearly basis on a daily, monthly or yearly basis
profession faces with respect to EBP.69 The review clinical practice and research evidence. In the first
included 65 peer reviewed articles relating to the instance, contemporary data on practice patterns can
construct of EBP within the practice of physiotherapy provide a guide for entry level curricula. However, at
of which 52 were editorials, discussion papers or the same time, a method for identifying and evaluat-
narrative reviews. Similarly, Chipchase identified ing evidence and research findings related to estab-
only five peer reviewed published papers evaluating lished EPAs needs to be developed. In addition, a
how EBP was integrated into entry level physiother- framework for monitoring and appraising the safety,
apy education.47 Essentially, these findings translate biophysical bases and potential clinical value of new
to a large amount of published opinion on EBP with modalities is warranted prior to their clinical adop-
very few empirical studies on its integration in tion by physiotherapists.
physiotherapy practice and entry level education. A solution for new modalities is rigorous and
Controversies about EBP also limit the develop- independent testing prior to its clinical adoption. The
ment of evidence based curricula. First, there is benefits and potential side effects should initially be
controversy as to what constitutes ‘best research garnered from basic research and include animal,
evidence’. Differences of opinion between academic cellular, anatomical, physiological and biophysical
teaching staff about acceptable types and quality of trials. Ways of evaluating the strength of this
evidence available have been reported.70 Also, evidence need to be determined as these types of
discussions in the professional literature about the trials are not without their limitations. However, this
value of different methodological and hierarchical would at least ensure that patient and operator safety
approaches are common.13,71–74 For example, the are not compromised.
role of qualitative research findings has yet to be For existing and established modalities, a method
addressed in most EBP hierarchies or research for categorising and evaluating the findings of
databases.13,75 This means that there is currently no clinically based studies is needed. For RCTs and
universally agreed upon evidence hierarchy (recognis- systematic reviews (of RCTs) internationally
ing both quantitative and qualitative approaches) to accepted review processes are available. However
ascertain the efficacy of different physiotherapeutic where ‘lower’ research approaches (n51, pre-post
interventions and techniques. Furthermore, the designs, uncontrolled trials) are appropriate for
research approaches supporting the use of many uncommon patient presentations or specific EPAs
EPAs include animal, cellular, anatomical and applications, a collaborative international steering
histological research for which many EBP hierarchies committee of academics and researchers could be
and critical appraisal tools are simply not available.24 convened to develop a relevant and useful EBP
In summary, at present, despite the need for framework that can be used to compare such
curricular decision making to be underpinned by approaches consistently.
best available research evidence, there is no clear and Using a consensus approach, this committee could,
well accepted model for how to undertake this for example, decide how to best quantify, present and
process. In addition, how the best available research disseminate the clinical evidence for a range of EPAs
underpinning curricular choices is transparently modalities. The review processes for each modality
presented to entry-level students is rarely considered. could be systematically undertaken by either inter-
The time, expertise and work required to undertake ested teams of academics, clinicians or research
regular systematic reviews of each and every phy- candidates. Determining which modalities should be
siotherapy assessment and treatment intervention in recommended for inclusion within entry-level curri-
order to determine which interventions should be cula could then be decided by countries, states, or
retained within entry-level curriculum is mind numb- educational institutions using best available research
ing. Consequently, it should come as no surprise that evidence combined with contemporary, local clinical
basing curricular decisions on clinical usage appears usage patterns. In addition, such a strategy would
to provide a convenient way of limiting curricula also highlight where higher level research approaches
content and producing clinically relevant entry level are required or clarification of efficacy is needed.
practitioners. In summary, this paper has presented a way
forward for determining the curricular content of
The way forward entry level physiotherapy programmes using EPAs as
A way forward is to find the middle ground for a case in point. The dilemmas and potential solutions
determining curricular content that relies on both can be equally applied to other physiotherapy
45 Westby MD. Rheumatology instruction in physiotherapy therapy 60 Warden SJ, McMeeken JM. Ultrasound usage and dosage in
undergraduate programs: a survey of Canadian universities. sports physiotherapy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:1075–80
Physiother Can 1999;51:264–72 61 Kitchen SS and Partridge CJ. A survey to examine the clinical use
46 Wong R, Stayeas C, Eury J, Ros C. Geriatric content in physical of ultrasound, shortwave diathermy and laser in England. Brit J of
therapist education programs in the United States. J Phys Ther Ed Ther and Rehab 1996;3:644–50
2001;15:4–9 62 Kitchen SS, Partridge CJ. Ultrasound, shortwave diathermy and
47 Chipchase L (2007): Electrophysical agents: entry-level physiother- laser: a survey to examine patterns of use in England. Brit J of
apy curricula and physiotherapy practice. Unpublished PhD Therap and Rehab 1997;4:75–8
Thesis: University of South Australia 63 Robertson V, Ward A. Longwave (45 kHz) ultrasound reviewed
48 Lindsay DM, Dearness J, McGinley CC. Electrotherapy usage and reconsidered. Physiotherapy 1997;83:123–30
trends in private physiotherapy practice in Alberta. Physiother Can 64 Robertson V. Ultrasound use in orthopedic physical therapy:
1995;47:30–4 invited commentary. Phys Ther 2007;87:995–9
49 Turner PA, Whitfield TWA. Multidimensional scaling analysis of 65 Robertson V. Invited commentary: why ERA variability is a
techniques used by physiotherapists in South East Australia: a concern? Phys Ther 2008;88:58–61
cross national replication. Aust J Physiother 2002;48:123– 66 Turner P, Whitfield TWA. Physiotherapists’ use of evidence based
30 practice: a cross national study. Physiother Res Int 1997;2:17–29
50 Venton-Gough J. Incidence of electrotherapy in physiotherapy. 67 Turner PA, Whitfield TWA. Physiotherapists’ reasons for selection
J Can Physiother Assoc 1962;13:81–90 of treatment techniques: a cross national survey. Physiother Theory
51 Baxter GD, Bell AJ, Allen JM, Ravey J. Low level laser therapy: Pract 1999;15:235–46
current clinical practice in Northern Ireland. Physiotherapy 68 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Muir Gray JA, Haynes RB,
1991;77: 171–8 Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it
52 McMeekan J, Stillman B. Perceptions of the clinical efficacy of isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71–2
laser therapy. Aust J Physiother 1993;39:101–5 69 Schreiber J, Stern P. A review of the literature on evidence-based
53 Paxton SL. Clinical use of TENS: a survey of physical therapists. practice in physical therapy. The Internet Journal of Sciences and
Phys Ther 1980;60:38–44 Practice 2005;3:17
54 Chipchase LS, Trinkle D. Therapeutic ultrasound: clinician usage 70 Chipchase LS, Williams MT, Robertson VJ. Factors affecting
and perception of efficacy. HK Physiother J 2003;21:5–10 curriculum content and the integration of evidence-based practice
55 Goh AC, Chok B, Wong WP, Fujiwara T. Therapeutic ultrasound: in entry-level physiotherapy programs. J Allied Health 2007;36:17–
rate of usage, knowledge of use, and opinions on dosimetry. 23
Physiother Singapore 1999;2:69–83 71 Baxter D. The end of evidence-based practice. Phys Ther Rev
56 Roebroeck ME, Decker J, Oostendorp RA. The use of therapeutic 2003;8:3–4
ultrasound by physical therapists in Dutch primary health care. 72 Bélanger A-Y. Evidence-based guide to therapeutic physical
Phys Ther 1998;78: 470–8 agents. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,
57 Stewart HF, Harris GR, Herman BE. Survey of use and 2002
performance of ultrasonic therapy equipment in Pinellas County, 73 Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher C, Moseley AM. Evidence
Florida. Physiotherapy 1974;54:707–14 based practice – imperfect but necessary. Physiother Theory Pract
58 ter Haar G, Dyson M, Oakley S. The use of ultrasound by 2001;17:201–11
physiotherapists in Britain, 1985. Ultrasound Med Biol 74 Watson T. The role of electrotherapy in contemporary physiother-
1987;13:659–63 apy practice. Man Ther 2000;5:132–41
59 ter Haar G, Dyson M, Oakley S. Ultrasound in physiotherapy in 75 Henderson R, Rheault W. Appraising and incorporating qualita-
the United Kingdom: results of a questionnaire. Physiotherap Pract tive research in evidence-based practice. J Phys Ther Ed
1988;4:69–72 2004;18:35–40
LUCY S. CHIPCHASE
School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia
Email [email protected]