Math’s Fine History

Megan Jones

Education 339

Dr. Laura Adkins

December 10, 2010

Introduction:

An introduction to Math is actually a complex topic to cover. It is as if

writing a paper over what came first, the chicken or the egg? You couldn’t

do math unless you had numbers, and you had to have numbers to know

how to count and to do basic math you have to understand numbers, a

constant circle of building and growing. In the beginning I believe there was

counting, the Bible even talks about Noah having two of every animal

embark their journey, whether or not Noah could count higher is something

we may never know. I do believe counting continued its existence with

every year a person lived. The bible also talks about how old a person was

and without being able to count your age would be irrelevant. After counting

and knowing your numbers, I believe that the first math subject was the

basic adding and subtracting. I just imagine a rancher counting his heard,

realizing that he has one less cow than the day before. Not knowing it, his

subtraction is one of the basic steps to understanding all areas of math.

I also believe that people had a better understanding of math, without

realizing its true value. It’s like a person understanding color, but not really

for sure why certain colors are produced from mixing two different ones. At

some point the wheel was invented (or stumbled upon); this simple shape is

one of the most common geometric shapes. Children learn about circles

before they learn to read. Because shapes are everywhere I feel as if people

in the past had a better understanding of math and especially geometry than
maybe what we give them credit for. They had to build houses, roads, and

plant crops, have enough fabric for clothes, how much water could one carry

to drink in a day. People worked hard for everything they owned, way back

when. One could say that they just didn’t have time to sit down and fully

appreciate how nature, science, and all that is surrounding us is found using

numbers, figures, and equations. Even today math is still surrounding us,

and we are still learning about it.

When someone ask me who my favorite mathematician is, it’s not

possible for me to fully answer them. I greatly enjoy studying about the

Golden Ration, Leonardo Davinci, and I’m always using Pythagoras theorem

and thinking about Euclidean Geometry. At night when I can’t sleep I budget

my husband and I’s money in my head, calculating numbers is my counting

sheep. I feel that is if even just one of these fine mathematicians did not

contribute all the work that he or she did our society would not be where it is

as at or even where it’s going. Our technology is getting faster and smaller;

and we have math (and science) to thank for that.

Even though I don’t have just one favorite mathematician I do know

why I love math. Growing up I fell in love with math in the fifth grade; unlike

spelling or remembering history events, it just clicked. Mr. Wilks, was my

fifth grade math teacher, introducing me to this vast beautiful world or

numbers. His teachings where followed by Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Gloshen, Mr.

Neria, and several college professors. Although these great teachers aren’t
published on Wikipedia, or known around the world for their attributes, if it

wasn’t for them, their love for math, and their willingness to help and push

me I wouldn’t be here wanting to follow in their footsteps. These teachers, in

my opinion, are some of the greatest mathematicians. They watered the

seed of knowledge and my love for math. I hope to one day influence other

students just as they did for me.

Section 1: Number Systems

There were many different periods or time frames for Egypt or Ancient

Egypt. In fact there were about eleven different major time periods for the

country. The earliest attested examples of mathematical calculations date

to the pre-dynastic Naqada period (4000 to 3000 BC), and show a fully

developed numeral system (Zaslavsky, 2002, p. 66) It wasn’t until 31 BC that

Egypt fell; they became a Roman province when the Roman Empire took the

country over. The Egyptians contributed greatly to the subject but then were

a “stationary character” or showed no progress for over 2,000 years (Cajori,

1980, p. 14).

The pharaoh had compled control fo the land its resources, was the

absolue monarch. Egypt’s economy was strictly controlled and centrally

organized. It wasn’t until the ‘Late Period’ that they started to use coins. Up

until the Late Period, the Egyptians would use an economic system that was

similar to bartering; having standards of grain. Egypt was later introduced to

coined money officially by the 5th century BC, thanks to international trading

(Cajori, 1980, p. 14).

The main form of writing is what we call hieroglyphic writing, or

pictures that represent animals, people and numbers. Hieroglyphic writing

has been around since 3200 BC. Shown below in image one is the

hieroglyphic numbers. However, scribes wrote using hieratic writing.

Hieratic writing looks like hieroglyphic but more cursive. Richard Gillings

explains that depending on which way the character faces determines the

direction the writing is coming from (1972, p. 6). More often than not people

wrote right to left. However, many scribes would write from left to right but

were still quick at their math because they used reference tables (Gillings,

1972, p. 14).

Image one (Smalley):

Egyptia
Decimal
n
Number
Symbol
1= staff

10 = heel bone

100 = coil of rope

1000 = lotus flower

pointing
10,000 =
finger
100,000 = tadpole
1,000,000 astonished
= man
 Because the number system was decimal base it worked with the

powers of ten. To represent a number, the sign for each decimal order was

repeated as many times as necessary. To make it easier to read the

repeated signs they were placed in groups of two, three, or four and

arranged vertically, as you can see in Image two (Smalley).

Image two (Smalley):

1000
1= 10 = 100 =
=
2000
2= 20 = 200 =
=
3000
3= 30 = 300 =
=
4000
4= 40 = 400 =
=
5000
5= 50 = 500 =
=
 “

Texts such as the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus and the Moscow

Mathematical Papyrus show that the ancient Egyptians could perform the

four basic mathematical operations – addition, subtraction, multiplication,

and division – use fractions, compute the volumes of boxes and pyramids,

and calculate the surface areas of rectangles, triangles, circles, and even

spheres. They understood basic concepts of algebra and geometry”

(Zaslavsky, 2002, p. 68). “Geometry of the Egyptians consists chiefly of

construction…” (Cajori, 1980, p. 11). Also, the golden ratio can be found in

many Egyptian creations. Recently more papri has been found, showing

examples of the quadratic equation (Cajori, 1980, p. 13).

The great thing about Egyptian mathematics is that it is very similar to

today’s modern mathematics; you can teach it to students! The way the

Egyptians added was by combining symbols; it is very similar how the Hindu-

Arabic system has place values. They would combine all of the necessary

units together to achieve the desire number, see image three. If there were
ten of one unit the scribes would replace those units with the higher unit

above. Ten staff equal one heel bone. Subtraction was very similar to how

he Egyptians added except that when they “borrowed” from a place value

the scribes would then have to draw ten of symbols of the lower value. Do

remember that they wrote right to left.

Image three (Smalley):

(=
456)

(=
265)

Multiplication was computed most commonly by scribes who used

tables that were previously made. Although it does take longer to solve the

answer using the Egyptian method compared to modern day’s method it is

very interesting how they multiplied. Smalley shows in example one how

scribes would multiply 5 and 29. Example two shows how the Egyptians

solved division problems, by having the scribes think what times 7 will equal

98?

Example 1 (Smalley):

*1 29
2 58
*4 116
1+4= 29 + 116 =
5 145
Example 2 (Smalley):

1 7
2 *14
4 *28
8 *56
2 + 4 + 8 = 14 + 28 + 56 =
14 98

Now, when it came to fractions things became a little bit trickier! To

symbolize that they were working with fractions, they used the hieroglyph

"an open mouth" above the number (Gillings, 1972, p. 20). Strangely

enough though, they had a special symbol for 2/3 and an entire table

devoted to its existence (Gililngs, 1972, p. 20). The 2/3 fraction can be seen

below in image four (Zaslavsky, 2002, p. 69). The Egyptians calculated

fractions opposite that of the Hindu-Arabic system. The denominator was the
variable and the numerator was constant (Cajori, 1980, p. 12). Because of

this system fractions had to be written as the sum of several fractions.

Fractions were written as the sum of unit fractions. For example 3/8 was

written as 1/4 + 1/8 (Smalley).

Image four (“Ancient Egypt”):

⁄3
2

in
hieroglyp
hs

Other contributions that we have deciphered based off of the famous

papyruses is that the Egyptians had an understanding for the Pythagorean

Theorem (“Ancient Egypt”), they also estimated the area of a circle (Gillings,

1972, p. 140), and even had a close approximation for Π (Gillings, 1972, p.

142).

Although at first glance that hieroglyphics and math seem to be

difficult, but to the Egyptians it was part of their everyday life. They used

math to find the area of triangles and build pyramids (Gillings, 1972, p. 137).

They would build ships and other architecture, grow crops and divide meals

using their bartering system which all required some form of math. They

even had set measurements such as cubits and palms (Gillings, 1972, p.
207) as well as created a 12 month calendar which revolved around the

annual flooding of the Nile River (Gillings, 1972, p. 235).

In conclusion, the Egyptians had some not only creative ideas on how

to solve math problems but used it in their everyday lives. Thanks to this

portion of the assignment I cannot wait for next summer when I get to go to

the British Museum and see the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus. It is not only

insane for me to think about how many years math has been around, but it’s

crazy to realize that without these discoveries (which some can be linked to

the Egyptians) we could be further behind in our small understanding of the

vast mathematical universe.

Section 2: Algebra

Algebra is math that we use every day in our life; dividing up a pizza to

make sure everyone gets equal portions to even calculating how much

money does one need to borrow from his or her friend to buy a shirt.

Algebra is a mathematic topic that went through several changes, touched

many cultures, and was manipulated by several people, yet it is still used

today.

During the 7th and 9th century India was discovering different algebraic

techniques while during the 13th and 15th centuries Italy was coming up with

algebraic solutions to the cubic equation and England was working with

“new” algebra. However, according to Katz, the Islamic culture contributed

the most to algebra, which their math stemmed from the Babylonians (Katz,

1998, p. 243). By the end of the 9th century Greek math was well known by

Islamic mathematicians. “The subject of geometric algebra has stirred a

major debate in recent years among those interested in Greek mathematics,

a debate centering around the questions of whether the Greeks were

interested in algebra at all and of whether this aspect of Greek mathematics

was directly or indirectly borrowed from the Babylonians” (Katz, 1998, p. 67).

So, did the Islamic culture get their ideas and concepts from the Babylonians

or the Greeks? Where did algebra come from?

The year was close to 825 and the author was al-Khwȧrizmῑ he wrote

Al-kitab al-muhtasar fi hisab al-jabr wa-l-muqabala or Compendium on

calculation by completion and balancing. Al- Khwȧrizmῑ’s book is where

algebra comes from, al-jabr, or the “completion.” The book discussed

mathematical methods as well how to solve six different types of quadratic

equations (Katz, 1998, p. 244). Al-Karaji, another great Islamic

mathematician, worked in Baghdad around 1000 and wrote al-Fakhri, to

determine unknowns from something that is known. He also discovered

infinite powers, xn (Katz, 1998, p. 253). Al-Khwȧrizmῑ is who helped create

the “Cossic Art” or the art of things, where writing algebra started to use

symbols, p = plus m = minus, allowing for algebra to become the universal

language (Berlinghoff, 2004, p. 113-114). There were many other Islamic

men that contributed greatly to the ‘creation’ of algebra. These several

writings/findings can be used in the discussion, that algebra was discovered

by the Islamic culture, that algebra originated there.

Without al-Khwȧrizmῑ and his comrades’ contributions, our knowledge

of math would be several decades if not centuries behind. During the

medieval ages many European mathematicians used al-Khwȧrizmῑ’s book on

solving equations, Katz states, “although the theory of combinatorics

appears to have developed in Europe through the Jewish tradition, the

writers on algebra in medieval Europe were direct heirs to Islamic work.” One

of the most important mathematics is Leonard of Pisa, or more commonly

known as Leonardo Fibonacci. Leonardo was born around 1770 to a wealthy

Italian merchant and died around 1250 (Marusezewski, 2009, p. 248). While

growing up, Leonardo traveled several times on business with his father to
Mediterranean areas where he learned about many of his math ideas. In

1202 his first work appeared, Liber Abbaci or Book of Calculation which was

finally published in 1228 (Katz, 1998, p. 307). Fibonacci also wrote Paractica

Geometriae and Liber Quadratorum or Book of Squares “is a book on number

theory, in which Leonardo discusses the solving in rational numbers of

various equations involving squares” (Katz, 1998, p. 309).

Two big contributions that are well known by today’s society are our

numbers, 1, 2, 3,… and the Fibonacci sequence. We can thank Leonardo for

these two big math concepts. He is the one that spread our number system,

Hindu-Arabic numbers, and used 0 or the sign the Arabs called “zephirum”

(cipher) (Katz, 1998, p. 307). The Fibonacci sequence (where you add the

two previous terms infinitely) was when Leonardo was curious about how

many pairs of rabbits can be bred in one year from one pair (Stillwell, 1989,

p. 126 - 128) and is now one of the most known mathematic ideas.

Through the centuries many different countries offered several

different mathematicians to help expand the knowledge of numbers and

math itself. France was proud to claim Nicolas Chuquet who wrote Triparty in

1484 about square roots, which it was never published. Christoff Rudolff and

Micheal Stifel of Germany worked with powers and the Pascal triangle.

Robert Recorde worked in Engalnd writing The Whetstone of Witte, a major

source and the first English algebra book in 1557. At the same time Pedro

Nunes was working with Portuguese algebra and wrote Libro de algebra in
1532 (Katz, 1998, p. 349-357). All of these great men simply expanded on

Leonardo’s ideas and continued to use his Hindu-Arabic number system.

One could suggest that, without the fantastic mathematical findings the

Islamic culture discovered that Leonardo Fibonacci later used in his own

theories, algebra would not be as well known as it is. These cultures and

authors laid the foundation for centuries to come, over something as simple

as al-jabr.

Section 3: Calculus

While some elite groups of mathematicians were studying algebra

during the 16th and 17th century, others were studying the universe and were

known as the “natural philosophers” (Berlinghoff , 2004, p. 42). Calculus

started to emerge in the 17th century as a short cut to finding lengths, areas,

and volumes (Stillwell, 1989, p. 100). Then through the 18th century one

could see the development of the techniques of calculus throughout Europe

(Katz, 1998, p. 76). Several men contributed to calculus including the

following: Rene Descartes (1596- 1650), Evangelista Torricelli (1608-1647),

John Wallis (1616-1703), John Bernoulli (1667-1748), Leonhard Euler (1707-

1783), and the latest Bernhard Riemann (1823-1866) (“The History of

Calculus”). Among these men there were two individuals that contributed

the most to the study of calculus, Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz.
 Isaac Newton was born December 25, 1642 in Lincolnshire. He was

given up by his mother at a very young. He later made his way to Trinity

College, Cambridge where he was a sizar (servant) to work for his studies

and started his early studies in Aristotle. As Newton grew older he made

enemies rather than friends because of his relationship problems during

adolescences. The best years of Newton’s career were between 1664- 1666

in which he developed and grew the most (Stillwell, 1989, p. 107 - 109).

Some can argue that Newton was not the ‘founder’ of calculus but that

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibneiz is the person behind the subject. Leibniz was the

first to publish a paper in 1684 over calculus and contributed more to the

spread of the subject. He also introduced the integral sign. Leibneiz proved

to have strengths in isolation rather than technical development of important

concepts. He is known to have pegged the differences between algebraic

and transcendental functions (Stillwell, 1989, p. 109).

The web article, “The History of Calculus” discusses the debate

between Newton and Leibniz very well. “Although they both were

instrumental in its creation, they thought of the fundamental concepts in

very different ways. While Newton considered variables changing with time,

Leibniz thought of the variables x and y as ranging over sequences of

infinitely close values. He introduced dx and dy as differences between

successive values of these sequences. Leibniz knew that dy/dx gives the

tangent but he did not use it as a defining property. On the other hand,
Newton used quantities x' and y', which were finite velocities, to compute the

tangent. Of course neither Leibniz nor Newton thought in terms of functions,

but both always thought in terms of graphs. For Newton the calculus was

geometrical while Leibniz took it towards analysis.”

Calculus went through three main periods of development,

anticipation, development, and rigorization. Anticipation was the period that

involved finding areas under curves or maximizing certain quantities, used

by the earlier mathematicians. Development is the time period that calculus

started to take shape with the help of Newton and Leibniz. These two men

created the base for the rest of the calculus society by bringing several

techniques together. The men who studied calculus through the 17th

century took what Leibniz and Newton discovered and turned it into a solid

mathematical foundation (“The History of Calculus”).

Calculus seems to be one of the newer mathematical discoveries and it

is really surprising to me that I was able to learn something that is roughly

the same age as our country. Yes, a few centuries are not as old as a couple

of millennium so it is intense to think that this subject is much newer

compared to ancient Egyptians and their mathematical discoveries. You

could spend hours upon hours debating over who founded calculus, was it

Isaac or Gottfried? But what one has to remember is the fact that they both

discovered it that without these two geniuses calculus might not be taught in

our schools. Without calculus there would be no economy and statistics

would have a different discipline (Crilly, 2008, p. 79). Although calculus is an

upper level math course people can use it or see it in their everyday life

without even knowing about it.

Section 4: Discrete Mathematics

What is discrete mathematics; a question that I had to ask myself,

even my professor. It was not one of the more common mathematical terms

that I am aware of. According to the website Making Math Engaging, “there

is no agreed-upon definition of discrete mathematics, there is a general

agreement that discrete mathematics includes three important areas:

combinatorics, iteration and recursion, and vertex-edge graphs.” However,

other sources consider discrete mathematics to include concepts such as

fractals, model theory, number theory, and graph theory. Discrete

mathematics does not include calculus and math analysis. If we know that

geometry and calculus and even algebra have been around for years,

centauries even millennium; the math that has seen empires rise and fall.

When did discrete mathematics make its mark?

Combinatorics is the study of the ways discrete structure scans be

combined or arranged (Love, 2006, p. 28). The earliest record of

combinatorics was in India around the 6th century by a man named

Varahamihira (Katz, 1998, p. 228). The book for educators, Math Through

the Ages, by William P. Berlinghoff and Fernando Q. Gouvea, states, “Indian

mathematicians were also interested in algebra and in some aspects of

combinatorics” (p. 27). As you continue to read the book discusses that

combinatorics also show up in the Arabic tradition later on (p. 31). The 9th

century, Maharvira gave an algorithm for calculating number of

combinatorics (Katz, 1998, p. 229). Jakob Bernoulli published Ars

Conjectangid in 1713 which examined permutations, combinations, and

probability theory of gambling games (Berlinghoff, 2004, p. 216). Since then

we have been dealing with combinatorics ever since.

Number theory, is the concept that is mainly concerned with properties

of numbers particularly integers. Number theory deals with things like

cryptology, function fields and analytical number theory. Kamal al-Farisi

discovered formulas dealing with number theory in the 13th century (Katz,

1998, p. 266). There are several different theories that branch from number

theory; elementary number theory, analytic number theory, algebraic

number theory, and several more.

This section of math is one that hasn’t been studied as much as others;

it is one that has fewer publishing in books and magazines. From my

research there was little information, clear facts, and it did not seem as if

there were as many mathematicians working with or on the topic of discrete

mathematics. Whether it is true or not, “Discrete Mathematics” on Wikipedia

discussed how there is prize money for a correct proof dealing with an

incredibly difficult math problem. I feel as if this topic is so intense that it is

not as solid like algebra or geometry, is why some people shy away from

studying it. I have to say when studying math, this would not be my first

topic of interest. I also conclude that probability and statistics is well more

known by individuals throughout the world, that they both tend to shadow

over discrete mathematics. However, one can be assured that this type of

math has been around just as long as all the other topics of math; showing

us that math has been around for centuries. Math has always been around

keeping its victims up at night thinking, wondering, and calculating numbers

trying to discover the next “big” thing. With time, I hope to better

understand discrete math so I can feel as if I am a better mathematician.

Section 5: Geometry (Euclidean and non-Euclidean)

Geometry, one of my very favorite aspects of mathematics! Before

this project I really never paid much attention to the difference between

Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometry, or even knew the difference. When

most people think of geometry they are thinking about shapes, lines, even

graphs they do not think about where it came from and who is behind the

scenes working on these discoveries.

The first recorded geometric related problems can be found on the

Egyptian Rhind Papyrus. Twenty-six of the hundred and ten problems are in

fact related to geometry; land areas, granary volume, area of a triangle, and

the Pythagorean theorem (Eves, 1964, p. 42). Later on, between 2000 –

1600 B.C. the Babylonian’s had general rules for area of a rectangle and

circumference of a circle (Eves, 1964, p. 32).

From there, Euclid wrote The Elements around 300 B.C., it is said to be

the second most read book of the western world. Euclid’s book is about five

postulates that he bases the rest of his proofs on (Marshall, 2004). Marshall

wrote the postulates were as follow: “1. [It is possible] to draw a straight line

from any point to any other. 2. [It is possible] to produce a finite straight line

continuously in a straight line. 3. [It is possible] to describe a circle with any

centre and distance [radius]. 4. That all right angles are equal to each other.

5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the interior
angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two lines, if produced

indefinitely, meet on that side on which the angles are less than the two

right angles.”

The theory of parallels gave the early Greeks trouble, and for centuries

many people tried to use the fifth postulate, although it failed repeatedly

(Eves, 1964, p. 124). It wasn’t until 1697 that Girolamo Saccheri, that there

was a solution to the failing of Euclid’s postulate, now making him the

forerunner of non-Euclidean geometry (Marhsall, 2004 and Eves, 1964,

p.355). Saccheri, an Italian Jesuit priest used the three following hypothesis:

“1. The summit angles are > 90 degrees (hypothesis of the obtuse angle). 2.

The summit angles are < 90 degrees (hypothesis of the acute angle). 3. The

summit angles are = 90 degrees (hypothesis of the right angle)” (Marshall,

2004 and Eves, 1964, p. 125). Saccheri not only found a solution to the fifth

postulate but he then contradicted the first hypothesis as well as the second

(Marshall, 2004).

It wasn’t until over 100 years later that someone understood the

problem to the fifth postulate. In 1817, Carl Fredrich Gauss of Germany

realized that the problem was that, the postulate was independent of the

other four (Eves, 1964, p. 366 and Marshall, 2004). At the same time Gauss

was working with non-Euclidean geometry so was Janos Bolyai from Hungary

and Nicolai Ivanovitch Lobachevsky from Russia (Eves, 1964, p. 366). These

three mathematicians are considered to be the founders of non-Euclidean

geometry (Eves, 1964, p. 355). Lobachevsky then did develop many

trigonometric identities dealing with triangles (Marshall, 2004).

Half of century later, in 1868 two years after Georg Riemann’s death,

one of his lectures was published which gave us what we could now call non-

Euclidean geometry. Then soon after in 1871, Felix Klein completed the

concepts of non-Euclidean geometry and laid the solid foundation for the

subject (Marshall, 2004).

As you can tell, geometry is far more in depth than just shapes and

lines. Without working on this paper I would have had no idea that the first

ideas of geometry were in fact not correct. That it took several centuries to

finally lay a sturdy foundation that students across the world now learn

about. Because I have always enjoyed geometry I know have a better

understand of whom to thank. So, thank you Euclid for the start of a great

idea and Saccheri, Gauss, Bolyai and Lobachevsky to correct this amazing

idea. Thank you to Riemann, which it is a shame that your fame didn’t come

until after you death, and a big thanks to Felix Klein for laying that last major

foundation.
Section 6: Measurement

Measurement by definition is 1. The act of measuring, 2. A measured

dimension, 3. Extent, size, etc., ascertained by measuring, 4. A system of

measuring or measures (“Measurement”). We use measurements and

measuring in our daily lives. From the size of clothes we wear to the how

much gas we put into our car, even the size of pizza we order is a form of

measurement. To me, personally, measurement is a standardized form to

describe something. It’s like how money represents different amounts but is

accepted by many, the same is true for all other measurements. There are

two main systems, metric and customary (Team, 2004).

“The metric system is the most widely used system of measurement in

the world. It is a more universal measurement standard as compared to the

customary system used in the United States” (Rivera, 2001). The website, A
chronology of the metric system, shows that the metric system has a long

list of history of facts. The first reported measurement was in 1585 when

Simon Stevin published his book The Tenth, which suggested a decimal

system, should be used for different forms of measurement. Then in 1670

credit for the metric system goes to a French man, Gabriel Mouton.

Throughout the years the metric system changed. However, in 1866 the

Untied States passed a law that made it unlawful to deal or trade using the

metric system! One hundred years later in 1968 the U.S. did a study on how

the metric system would impact the country. Three years later, when the

study ended, it was concluded that the U.S. should “go metric” and had a

target date of ten years out. However that idea never followed through.

1974 was the year that the government decided that it was required that all

students were educated as part of the regular educational program (“A

chronology of the metric system”). Even now the United States is still

working and dealing with the metric system. Although the system is used in

our lives as U.S. citizens (pop is in liters, doctor’s measure medicine using

metric) but it is thought to be an easier system to learn for it is base ten.

As we discussed many things can be measured, and there are two

main systems to measure them by. The typical amounts that we measure

are weight, length, capacity, and time. The basic unit of length is the meter

when using the metric system, while inches, feet, yards and miles are the

basic unit in the customary system. Before we used the meter and the inch

there was the cubit, or roughly the length of the arm. The cubit was
developed around 3000 BC by the Egyptians. The Greeks then used the

width of 16 fingers to measure one foot. However, the Romans were the

ones who divided the foot into 12 sections called unicae or later called an

inch. The 12th century was when Kin Henry I adopted the yard. So the

customary system has been through many changes such as the metric

system (Rivera, 2001).

Weight is commonly measured by grams (metric) or by pounds

(customary). The earliest given measurement of weight was by the

Babylonians. They had the gur, which was close to 80 gallons. The Hebrews’

had a system that could measure both dry and wet substances. When the

Romans divided the foot into twelve inches they also developed the pinte to

measure liquid and the quart to measure dry substances. Weight is most

often measured by using a scale (Rivera, 2001).

Capacity is another amount that we measure. If you use the metric

system you will be measuring with liters more than likely while in the

customary system you will be working with cups and quarts. Just as the

Babylonians had the gur they also had the mina, which was close to 23

ounces. The Romans’ libra is a pound in the U.S. customary system (Rivera,

2001).

One of the most important measurements is time. Our lives run on

time with appointments, school, jobs, birthdays, anniversaries, etc. Time

has been determined in history by the noticing the movement in the sun,
moon, and the starts. The oldest pattern of a constellation recorded was

Orion on a mammoth tusk that is close to 32,500 years old. The earliest star

map by the Egyptians is close to 3,500 years old with record of a solar

eclipse in 1534 BC (Rogers). Across thousands of miles or meters

Stonehenge was built over 4,000 years ago in England. Stonehenge was use

by the civilizations the time of the day and the year. It wasn’t until 46 BC

that Julius Caesar decided that a calendar should have 365 days (Rivera,

2001). To measure time was a little bit trickier. We calmly think of watches

and clocks but before those technological advances there were tools such as

the oil lamps, candle clocks, water clocks, and the hourglass. Eventually

mechanical clocks replaced water clocks around 1275 (Rogers).

Measuring length, weight, capacity and time are part of our lives no matter

what. Without these discoveries that are historically old we might not be as

“civilized” as we are now. That without the calendar we wouldn’t have due

dates for homework assignments. We would not understand why we are

working word math problems. Overall the most important realization is that

measuring is an important concept to learn about, understand, and teach.

Section 7: Probability and Statistics

Probability and statistics are some of the most recent mathematical

discoveries. Before 1750 probability theory was inspired by games of change

such as card games, dicing and lotteries (Hald, 1990, pg. 4). There are two

different kinds of probability; there is objective also known as aleatory

probabilities or statistical which is the chance of birth or dying. The second

type of probability is subjective also known as epistemic or personal.

Subjective is measuring the degree of a belief in a statement and can be

subdivided in several classes (Hald, 1990, pg. 28).

Probability didn’t get its mark in history until around the 1600’s and

didn’t really take off until about a century later. Blaise Pascal started to lay

the foundation of probability theory in 1654. Pascal and Fermat started on

the problem of points. In 1657 Christiaan Huygens published the first work

on probability (Crilly, 2008, pg. 132). Huygens’ book called Reckoning at

Games of Chance is the start of it all. Nearly fifty years later around the turn

of the century is when Montmort wrote Essay d’Analyse sur les Jeux de

Hazard (Hald, 1990, pg. 4). Shortly after Montmort’s work Abraham de

Moivre published The Doctrine of Chance in 1718 with expanded editions in

1738 and 1750 (Crilly, 2008, pg 132). As John Aldrich discussed in his web

article the 1700 to the 1750’s is when probability started to leap forward.

John, who studied Hald’s book History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750

to 1930, tells that this is when the subject started to expand.

 From 1750 to the 1800’s probability started to establish itself in

astronomy and other physical sciences. Daniel Bernoulli, Boscovich, Eurler,

Labert, Mayer and Lagrange were some of the mathematicians and scientists

that worked to incorporate statistics into the sciences. Laplace and Gauss

dominate the 1800 to the 1830 in probability with focusing on theory errors.

Thirty years after is when statistical probability started to emerge along with

statistical societies such as the London (Royal) Statistical Society. The use

of probability in science never takes a back seat; during the years between

the 1860’s to the 1880’s science begins to deal with gases and heredity

(Aldrich, 2005). Research of statistics did not stop before the 1900’s; in

1912 Keynes published Treatise on Probability, which influence his theories

of economics and statistics (Crilly, 2008, pg. 148). Research and studies

continued through out the 20the century. Even today computers have

changed the way people compute and think about statistics, for example

data tables of random numbers are easier to produce and be used or

analyzed in classes.

Considering there are numerous mathematicians and scientist that

have provided, supported, and contributed to the history of probability and

statistics it is hard to choose only one person that contributed the most. To

me it is a toss up between Pascal and Hugyens (Aldrich, 2005). That

between these two men I feel as if the foundation of probability and statistics

were established. That if it wasn’t for these mathematicians it could have

been years later for someone to “stumble” upon statistics. What’s the
chance of history writing its self like this again? However, just between

these two gentlemen Christiaan Huygens is, in my opinion, the ‘founder’ to

probability.

Christiaan Huygens was born in 1629 and was expected to become a

diplomat at a young age. Instead he chose to become a scientist, studying

at the University of Leiden as well as the College of Orange at Brenda. He

had the first ever probability work published with much of the book devoted

to finding the value, which is really the main reason I choose him as the

founder (Aldrich, 2005).

Overall this was an interesting topic. For some reason, before writing

this paper, I thought that probability and statistics would have been an

earlier discovery that it would have come before calculus or geometry

because it’s just numbers more concrete than abstract. It is fun to just think

about different chances we have in life. Just the other day, as a

photographer, I was discussing with my friend the idea of how many pictures

we are in that we don’t know about. If you were to be at a party, a crowded

tourist location, or just walking in the park statistically speaking can one

figure out how many times his or her body/face appears in a totally random

person’s picture. Look back through your pictures, do you know everyone in

them or are there some strangers? What’s the chance or likelihood you

would be meeting them again?

 Probability and statistics is around us at all times. Even the grade that

I will receive on this paper is a statistic it is a probability as well. I think it is

very important for us to understand where these concepts came from.

Therefore I am very thankful that I was given the opportunity to study and

better inform myself over this subject

Conclusion:
This paper has been a wonderful enlightenment to me. It has been a

way for me to better understand my content area. This project has helped

me learn about my past and where we are going in our future. I feel as if this

project will help me to become a better teacher because I know the

background of math. If I am teaching algebra and someone wants to know

more information I’ll be able to tell him or her that not only our numbers are

Hindu Arabic but also algebra actually comes from the word aljabar. That

with extra information I am better prepared to help my students learn to

their full capacity. That without this paper I wouldn’t have understood the

major contributors explaining how these men and women were so profound

in the making, creating, discovery of math.

 In the introduction of this paper I stated that I wanted to make an

impact on students like many of my teachers and professors have done for

me. And I feel that this paper will help me to become that teacher. I also

stated that math was around more than likely without people fully being

aware of what it was. I was impressed with how much information is as old

as it is. I had no idea that the history of math is in fact centuries and

millenniums old. As far as having a favorite mathematician I think I have

now “settled” on Euclid. As much as I love geometry I have him to thank.

However, I can’t rightfully thank him without thanking all the other people

that came before him.

There are several ways that I could use this information in my future

classes. It can be used as part of differentiating instruction. That if I have

tag students in my classroom I can further engage them by asking them to

work problems based off of the Egyptian system or do their own research on

their favorite mathematician or what part of history they find to be the most

profound. But not only would I be able to use this for tag students but I

could also use it to relate to other students. If they ask “why do we need

this, its not important” that I better understand how they apply this in real

life. Overall this is something that I can always reference and use in my

classroom. Even if it’s just to have as student read it and summarize for his

or her own benefit.

 In conclusion by reading and writing about how and who discovers a

certain topic of math makes me wonder what else is out there, what have we

not discovered, and will there ever be a cap or ending to our knowledge of

the mathematical universe. What is next for us?

 Resources:

"Ancient Egypt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Wikipedia, the free

encyclopedia. N.p., n.d.

Web. 13 Sept. 2010. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egypt>.

Images.

Berlinghoff, William P., and Fernando Q. Gouvêa. Math Through the Ages: A

Gentle History for

Teachers and Others, Expanded Edition (Classroom Resource

Materials). 2 ed. New

York: The Mathematical Association Of America: Oxton House

Publishing, 2004. Print.

Cajori, Florian. A History of Mathematics. 3rd ed. Washington D.C.: Chelsea

Pub. Co, 1980. Print.

“A Chronology of the Metric System." Colorado State University. U.S. Metric

Association, n.d.

Web. 23 Oct. 2010. <http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/dates.htm>.

Crilly, Tony. 50 Mathematical Ideas You Really Need to Know. Cambridge:

Quercus, 2008. Print.

Eves, Howard. An Introduction to the History of Mathematics. Revised ed.

New York: Holt,

Rinehart, and Winston, 1964. Print.

Gillings, Richard J.. Mathematics in the Time of the Pharaohs. London: The

Mit Press, 1972.

Print.

"The History of Calculus." The University of Iowa. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Sept.

2010.

<http://www.uiowa.edu/~c22m025c/history.html>.

Holt, Lloyd, and Audrey Smalley. "Number Systems." Topic Tree. N.p., n.d.

Web. 13 Sept. 2010.

< www.math.wichita.edu/history/topics/num-sys.html#egypt>.

Katz, Victor J.. A History of Mathematics: An Introduction (2nd Edition). 2 ed.

Toronto: Addison

Wesley, 1998. Print.

Love, Tanzy, Fritz Keinert, and Mack Shelley. "Web-based Implementation of

Discrete

Mathematics." Jounral of STEM Education 7 (2006): 25-35. Print.

"Making Math Engaging: Discrete Mathematics." Shodor: A National Resource

for

Computational Science Education. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2010.

<http://www.shodor.org/discretemath/index.php?

content=whatis_dmath>.

Marshall, Daniel, and Paul Scott. "A Brief History of Non-Euclidean

Geometry." Australian

Mathematics Teacher 60.3 (2004): 2-4. Academic Search Premier.

Web. 20 Oct. 2010.

Maruszewski, Richard. "Fibonacci's Forgotten Number Revisisted." College

Mathematics Journal

40.4 (2009): 248-251. Print.

"Measurement." Dictionary.com. Random House, Inc, n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2010.

<http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/measurement>.

Rivera, Ada. "Measuring Measurement." Math: Customary or Standard

Measurement.

University of Missouri, 7 June 2001. Web. 23 Oct. 2010.

<atlantis.coe.uh.edu/archive/science/science_lessons/scienceles3/m

easure/>.
Rogers, Leo. "A Brief History of Time Measurement." Enrich . University of

Cambridge, n.d.

Web. 23 Oct. 2010. <nrich.maths.org/6070>.

Stillwell, John. Mathematics and Its History. 5th ed. Chicago: Springer-Verlag

Telos, 1989. Print.

Team, Nrich. "History of Measurement." Enrich. University of Cambridge, n.d.

Web. 23 Oct.

2010. <http://nrich.maths.org/2434>.

Zaslavsky, Claudia. "Exploring World Cultures in Math Class." Educational

Leadership 60.2

(2002): 66-69. Print.