Production and Cost Analysis
Production and Cost Analysis
Cost Analysis
Production Function
o Relates physical output of a production process to physical inputs or factors of
production. It is a mathematical function that relates the maximum amount of
output that can be obtained from a given number of inputs – generally capital and
labor. The production function, therefore, describes a boundary or frontier
representing the limit of output obtainable from each feasible combination of
inputs.
o Firms use the production function to determine how much output they should
produce given the price of a good, and what combination of inputs they should
use to produce given the price of capital and labor. When firms are deciding how
much to produce they typically find that at high levels of production, their
marginal costs begin increasing. This is also known as diminishing returns to
scale – increasing the quantity of inputs creates a less-than-proportional increase
in the quantity of output. If it weren’t for diminishing returns to scale, supply
could expand without limits without increasing the price of a good.
Notes to Remember:
The production function describes a boundary or frontier representing the limit of output
obtainable from each feasible combination of inputs.
Firms use the production function to determine how much output they should produce
given the price of a good, and what combination of inputs they should use to produce
given the price of capital and labor.
The production function also gives information about increasing or decreasing returns to
scale and the marginal products of labor and capital.
Isoquants - represents all those factor combinations which are capable of producing the
same level of output.
o Iso = Equal or Same
Key Terms:
The Law Of Diminishing Marginal Utility states that all else equal as consumption
increases the marginal utility derived from each additional unit declines. Marginal utility
is derived as the change in utility as an additional unit is consumed. Utility is an
economic term used to represent satisfaction or happiness. Marginal utility is the
incremental increase in utility that results from consumption of one additional unit.
Marginal utility may decrease into negative utility, as it may become entirely unfavorable
to consume another unit of any product. Therefore, the first unit of consumption for any
product is typically highest, with every unit of consumption to follow holding less and
less utility. Consumers handle the law of diminishing marginal utility by consuming
numerous quantities of numerous goods.
o Example:
An individual can purchase a slice of pizza for $2; she is quite hungry and
decides to buy five slices of pizza. After doing so, the individual consumes
the first slice of pizza and gains a certain positive utility from eating the
food. Because the individual was hungry and this is the first food she
consumed, the first slice of pizza has a high benefit. Upon consuming the
second slice of pizza, the individual’s appetite is becoming satisfied. She
wasn't as hungry as before, so the second slice of pizza had a smaller
benefit and enjoyment as the first. The third slice, as before, holds even
less utility as the individual is now not hungry anymore.
An economic theory that illustrates the rate at which one factor must decrease so that the
same level of productivity can be maintained when another factor is increased.
The MRTS reflects the give-and-take between factors, such as capital and labor, that
allow a firm to maintain a constant output. MRTS differs from the marginal rate of
substitution (MRS) because MRTS is focused on producer equilibrium and MRS is
focused on consumer equilibrium.
Key Points:
The marginal rate of technical substitution shows the rate at which you can substitute one
input, such as labor, for another input, such as capital, without changing the level of
resulting output.
The isoquant, or curve on a graph, shows all of the various combinations of the two
inputs that result in the same amount of output.
Analyzation:
Panel I – No substitution
Panel 2 – Perfect Substitution
Panel 3 – Imperfect Substitution
It is an input combination which maximizes output given the costs faced by the firm.
While all the input combinations are technically efficient, the final decision to employ a
particular input combination is purely an economic decision and rests on cost (expenditure).
Thus, the production manager can make either of the following two input choice decisions:
1. Choose the input combination that yields the maximum level of output with a given level of
expenditure.
2. Choose the input combination that leads to the lowest cost of producing a given level of
output.
Thus, the decision is to minimize cost subject to an output constraint or maximize the output
subject to a cost constraint.
RETURNS TO SCALE
Returns to Scale
How output responds in the long run to changes in the scale of the firm?
1. If output increases by more than an increase in inputs, then the situation is one of
increasing returns to scale (IRS). O > I
2. If output increases by less than the increase in inputs, then it is a case of decreasing
returns to scale (DRS). O < I
3. Lastly, output may increase by exactly the same proportion as inputs. This is a case
of constant returns to scale (CRS). O = I
EXAMPLE: A box with dimensions 4*4*4 has a capacity of 64 times a box with dimensions
1*1*1, even though the former uses only 16 times more wood than the smaller box. 3 Isoquants
can also be used to depict returns to scale (Figure) Panel A shows constant returns to scale. Three
isoquants with output levels 50,100 and 150 are drawn. In the figure, successive isoquants are
equidistant from one another along the ray 0Z. Panel B shows increasing returns to scale, where
the distance between 2 isoquants becomes less and less i.e. in order to double output from 50 to
100, input increase is less than double. The explanation for panel C, which exhibits decreasing
returns to scale, is analogous. There is no universal answer to which industries will show what
kind of returns to scale. Some industries like public utilities (Telecom and Electricity generation)
show increasing returns over large ranges of output, whereas other industries exhibit constant or
even decreasing returns to scale over the relevant output range. Therefore, whether an industry
has constant, increasing or decreasing returns to scale is largely an empirical issue.
1. The function includes only two factors and neglects other inputs.
2. The function assumes constant returns to scale.
3. There is the problem of measurement of capital which takes only the quantity of capital
available for production.
4. The function assumes perfect competition in the factor market which is unrealistic.
5. It does not fit to all industries.
6. It is based on the substitutability of factors and neglects complementarity of factors.
7. The parameters cannot give proper and correct economic implication.
In the CES production function, the elasticity substitution is constant and not necessarily equal to
unity.
Mukherji has generated the CES function by introducing more than two inputs.
1. The value of elasticity of substitution depends upon the value of substitution parameter.
2. The marginal products of labour and capital are always positive if we assume constant
returns to scale.
3. The marginal product of an input will increase when other factor inputs increase.
4. When the elasticity substitution is less than unity the function does reach a finite
maximum as one factor increases while other is held constant.
5. The marginal product curves are sloping downward.
6. The estimation of the elasticity of substitution parameter requires the assumption of
perfect com-petition.
1. The generated function suffers from the drawback that elasticity of substitution between
any parts of inputs in the same which does not appear to be realistic.
2. In estimating parameters of CES production function, we may encounter a large number
of problems like choice of exogenous variables, estimation procedure and the problem of
multicollinearities.
3. Any attempt to remove the problem of multicollinearities would magnify the errors in
measure-ment of variables.
4. Serious doubts have been raised about the possibility of identifying the production
function under technological change.
Recently attempts have been made by Bruno, Knox Lovell and Revankar to get a new
production function. The resulting production function is the generalisation of CES
which possesses the desirable properties of variable elasticity substitution.
Lu and Fletcher have filled a logarithmic relationship containing the wage rate (W) as
well as the capital-labour ratio (K/L) to explain value added per unit of labour.
σ = b/1-c (1+WL/rk)
Innovation
Translating an idea or invention into a good or service that creates value or for
which customers will pay. To be called an innovation, an idea must be
replicable at an economical cost and must satisfy a specific need.
Global Competitiveness
Products, like people, have life cycles. The product life cycle is broken into
four stages: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. This concept is used
by management and by marketing professionals as a factor in deciding when it
is appropriate to increase advertising, reduce prices, expand to new markets,
or redesign packaging.
o Introductory Stage - This stage of the cycle could be the
most expensive for a company launching a new product.
The size of the market for the product is small, which
means sales are low, although they will be increasing. On
the other hand, the cost of things like research and
development, consumer testing, and the marketing needed
to launch the product can be very high, especially if it’s a
competitive sector.
o Growth Stage – The growth stage is typically characterized
by a strong growth in sales and profits, and because the
company can start to benefit from economies of scale in
production, the profit margins, as well as the overall
amount of profit, will increase. This makes it possible for
businesses to invest more money in the promotional
activity to maximize the potential of this growth stage.
o Maturity Stage – During the maturity stage, the product is
established and the aim for the manufacturer is now to
maintain the market share they have built up. This is
probably the most competitive time for most products and
businesses need to invest wisely in any marketing they
undertake. They also need to consider any product
modifications or improvements to the production process
which might give them a competitive advantage.
o Decline Stage – Eventually, the market for a product will
start to shrink, and this is what’s known as the decline
stage. This shrinkage could be due to the market becoming
saturated (i.e. all the customers who will buy the product
have already purchased it), or because the consumers are
switching to a different type of product. While this decline
may be inevitable, it may still be possible for companies to
make some profit by switching to less-expensive
production methods and cheaper markets.
JIT Production System
Competitive Benchmarking