How To Write A Personal Statement
How To Write A Personal Statement
Welcome to EssayEdge's Graduate School Statements 101! Our experts have assembled the most
comprehensive course on the Internet to help you compose successful graduate school essays. A personal
statement or autobiographical essay represents a graduate school's first qualitative introduction to the way you
think and to the way you express yourself. The personal statement must serve as a reflection of your personality
and intellect. You must sell yourself through this statement, just as you would through a successful job interview.
Preparation and personal reflection are essential.
If you find it difficult to write about yourself, don't be discouraged. Having assisted tens of thousands of
applicants, we can assure you that everyone has problems composing these statements. If you have a friend
who finishes one in two hours flat and doesn't agonize over what he or she is writing, chances are it's not a
statement that will do much to enhance his or her prospects for admission. Good essays take time. Bad ones can
hurt your chances for admission.
The essays required of graduate school applicants fall into two major categories. First, there is the general,
comprehensive personal statement, which allows the applicant more latitude in what he or she writes. The
second category encompasses essays that are responses to specific questions. Here the applicant might have
less latitude in terms of your topic, but it is still possible and prudent to compose a thoughtful and compelling
response that holds the reader's interest.
No matter what type of application form you are dealing with, it is extremely important that you read each
question carefully and respond to it fully. Some applications are more vague or general in their instructions than
others; for these, it is often possible to compose almost any sort of essay you wish. You have virtually total
control, and you also have a remarkable opportunity that you can either maximize or squander—the choice is
yours.
The purpose of this guide is not to teach formulas, but rather to give the necessary direction for you to create an
original and effective essay. We will teach you how to choose appropriate topics and themes, how to structure
your essay as a coherent and flowing piece, and how to convey your ideas through engaging and active
language.
Course Lessons
Lesson One: Preparation
• The Audience
• Key Attributes
• Common Flaws
• Brainstorming
• Topic Selection
Lesson Two: Graduate Statement Themes
• Why Graduate School?
• Why Qualified?
• Why Unique?
• Explain Blemishes
Lesson Three: Essay Structures
• Overarching Themes
• Organization
• Narratives
• Paragraphs
Lesson Four: Style and Tone
• Sentence Variety
• Word Choice
• Verb Tense
• Tone
• Essay Clichés
Lesson Five: Intros and Conclusions
• Introduction Types
• Conclusions
Lesson Six: Editing and Revising
• Editing Checklist
• Final Steps
Essay Edge Extra: The Potential Impact of the Personal Statement—Good and Bad
"It's possible to redeem yourself or to kill your chances of admission with the personal statement. What's most
important to me is for the candidate to make a compelling case for himself or herself. I want to be persuaded that
I should admit this person." — The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton
University
"If I sense that a candidate is just filling out half a page cursorily—just doing the personal statement pro forma—
and has not put much time or imagination into it, that's the kiss of death." — Graduate English Department,
UCLA
The Audience
Unlike undergraduate admissions committees, which usually are comprised of full-time administrative staff, a
graduate admissions committee consists of professors in the specific program to which you are applying.
Occasionally, the committee will also invite a small number of students currently enrolled in the program to
participate in the process.
An applicant's file consists of transcripts, GRE or other test scores, letters of recommendation, and one or more
essays. Admissions committees read the essays within the larger context of a candidate's application. The
essays are your chance to tell the personal story that the other pieces of the application cannot.
Admissions committees for programs in different fields evaluate personal statements according to vastly different
criteria. Professors reading applications for programs in language-intensive fields such as literature and
philosophy examine the originality and elegance of the applicant's thoughts as well as fine points of style. In
engineering or scientific fields, on the other hand, admissions committees seek to gain more basic insight into the
applicant's goals and to confirm a baseline of competency in written English. In fact, for many applicants to
graduate programs in the sciences, English is not even their primary language.
As the committee members make their way through stack after stack of applications, they often place the
applications they have already reviewed into a hierarchy of admission. The particular aspects of this process
vary, but according to an admissions officer at the University of Washington, their hierarchy of admission is as
follows, in decreasing order of applicant attractiveness: "Admit with guaranteed funding, Admit with potential
funding, Tabled (a sort of admissions purgatory), and Reject." It is in the case of "Tabled" and "Admit with
potential funding" applications, the admissions officer reports, that the personal statement can make a real
difference: "If there is a good match between the applicant's research interests and the particular strengths of the
school, this can bump them up a level or two in the hierarchy of admission."
Among the schools whose admissions officers we consulted, the minimum number of readers who look at an
applicant's essay(s) ranged from two to ten, with an average of twenty minutes spent on essays for laboratory
and computational science programs, and thirty minutes on those for all other programs.
Key Attributes
To a large degree, the particular graduate program you are applying to will dictate the content of a successful
application essay. However, certain qualities of these essays apply equally to all fields. Admissions committee
members are looking for interesting, insightful, revealing, and non-generic essays that suggest you have
successfully gone through a process of careful reflection and self-examination. Your essay should offer a very
thorough, probing, and analytical look at yourself and your objectives.
Sincerity
Don't focus too heavily on what you think admissions officers want to see, at the expense of conveying your own
message in your unique way. Be yourself rather than pretending to be the "ideal" applicant. Inundated with
countless cliché-ridden essays, admissions committees respond very favorably to honesty. Don't be afraid to
reveal yourself. Admissions officers are interested in finding out about who you are, and they appreciate candor.
Sincerity is important to stress because it's hard for most of us to achieve, despite the fact that it seems so
simple. The pressures and anxieties of the situation have locked us into a mindset that prevents us from writing
honestly. Further, because we are not used to writing about ourselves and being so close to the subject, we
cannot assess the sincerity of our own writing. Thousands of students every year will read this same advice,
whether in a guidebook or even in the application instructions themselves, but they simply will not be able to put it
into practice. If you can be one of the few who truly understand what it means to be sincere, then you will already
have separated yourself from the pack in a crucial way.
You might question how a reader who doesn't know you can judge your statement's sincerity. The basis for
judgment usually lies in the context your reader has developed from reading hundreds or thousands of other
essays. Assessing your essay against others is one essential area in which EssayEdge can offer a more critical
eye than your friends, relatives, or teachers who have not accumulated the expertise specific to the personal
statement. Moreover, our perspective in reading your essay is just as objective as your admissions reader's
perspective will be.
Writing Ability
Again, the importance of writing ability varies according to different programs. A great flair for language will not
get you admitted into a biochemistry program, but it's still essential to demonstrate strong written communication
skills. On the other hand, you should also keep in mind that a well-written essay makes its points clearly and
forcefully, so your content benefits as well.
Good writing means more than the ability to construct grammatical sentences. You also must create a coherent
structure and ensure proper flow as the piece progresses. Because the process of developing ideas and putting
them down on paper is so intimate and personal, all writers end up needing editors to assess the effectiveness of
their product. You should consult people whose writing you respect for advice or even more hands-on help.
Having been trained specifically in the nuances of admissions essay writing, EssayEdge editors are the best
equipped to provide assistance in this crucial area.
Common Flaws
Knowing what turns off admissions committees in an essay are as important as knowing what they find desirable.
Careless Errors
There is really no excuse for careless errors, and having even one in your application can affect the way you are
perceived. You have more than enough time to proofread and have others look over your essay. If an error slips
through, your readers may assume that you are careless, disorganized, or not serious enough about your
application.
Remember that spell check does not catch all possible errors, and even grammar check is far from perfect. In
addition to typographical errors such as repeated words, you have to read the essay carefully to catch mistakes
in meaning that might come in the form of a grammatically correct sentence.
Let these humorous but unfortunate examples be a lesson to read your essay carefully for unintended meanings
and meaningless sentences:
It was like getting admitted to an Ivory League school.
Berkeley has a reputation of breeding nationalists and communists.
I'd like to attend a college where I can expose myself to many diverse people.
I was totally free except for the rules.
In a word, the experience taught me the importance of dedication, friendship, and goals.
I have an extensive knowledge of the value of intelligence.
I envy people with a lot of time in their hands.
Vague Generalities
The most egregious generalizations are the ones that have been used so many times that they have become
clichés. For example, "I learned the value of hard work." That statement doesn't tell us anything insightful or
interesting about the writer's character, because it has been said so many times as to become meaningless.
Generalities come in the same form as clichés, except with different content. They are always superficial and
usually unoriginal, but haven't quite reached the level of predictability that would make them qualify as clichés.
Consider this before-and-after set to learn how to evaluate this factor in your writing:
Before: In the first project I managed, I learned many valuable lessons about the importance of teamwork.
After: In the first project I managed, I made an effort to incorporate all my colleagues as equal members of a
team, soliciting their feedback and deferring to their expertise as needed.
Terms like "valuable lessons" and "teamwork" are vague and do not really convey anything meaningful about the
applicant's experience. In contrast, the revised version explains the team dynamic in more detail, showing
specifically how the applicant exercised teamwork principles. The passage should go on to include even more
detail, perhaps by naming a particular colleague and discussing the applicant's interaction with that person.
Sounding contrived is a problem related to overly general writing. Applicants often have preconceived notions
about what they should be discussing, and they try to force those points onto the experiences they relate. The
best way to counteract this tendency is to start with your experiences and let the insights flow from there. Think
about your most meaningful experiences and describe them honestly. Often you will find that you don't need to
impose conclusions because the personal qualities you're trying to demonstrate will be inherent in the details. If
you decide that clarification is necessary, the transition should still be natural.
Sensitive Topics
Don't get on a soapbox and preach to the reader; while expressing your values and opinions is fine, avoid coming
across as fanatical or extreme. Avoid mentioning subjects that are potentially controversial; it is impossible for
you to know the biases of members of various admissions committees. Religion and politics normally don't
belong in these statements, although there may be exceptions (an applicant who has held an important office on
campus or in the community would likely want to include this fact). Personal political views usually are not
appropriate for personal statements. Any views that might be interpreted as strange or highly unconventional
should also be omitted because you want to avoid the possibility of offending any of the individuals in whose
hands the fate of your graduate school application rests.
Gimmicks
Don't use a gimmicky style or format. Your "clever" or "original" idea for style probably isn't, and it may not be
appreciated.
"Avoid cuteness; we've had people who have done career statements in the form of a miniplay, for example. You
want to sound like a professional." — The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs,
Princeton University
Long-Windedness
Sometimes the same writer who relies too heavily on generalizations will also provide too many irrelevant details.
That's why most essays submitted to EssayEdge are returned with significantly reduced word counts and,
conversely, suggestions for additions. The problem is that writers often don't consider what is actually necessary
to include, or they repeat points freely.
Example of Irrelevant Detail: "After a meeting with my adviser, I returned home to think over the matter more
carefully. Ultimately, I came to the conclusion that my interests in physical properties and mental life would best
be explored in a double major of biology and psychology."
In this example, we learn nothing about the applicant from the mention of his meeting with an adviser. What's
relevant are his interests and the decision he made based on them. The details about how he arrived at the
decision are not illustrative of his character in any way and are therefore superfluous.
Example of Redundancy: "The class taught me a great deal about the value of literature. I learned that literature
can both instruct and inspire, and this understanding has changed the way I read every text."
The first sentence is unnecessary because the second sentence makes the same point with more specificity.
In addition to superfluous content, you also have to watch out for wordy writing. Wordiness not only takes up
valuable space, but it also can confuse the important ideas you're trying to convey. Short sentences are more
forceful because they are direct and to the point.
Before: "My recognition of the fact that the project was finally over was a deeply satisfying moment that will
forever linger in my memory."
Big Words
Using longer, fancier words does not make you sound more intelligent, since anyone can consult a thesaurus.
Simpler language is almost always preferable, as it demonstrates your ability to think and express yourself
clearly.
Before: "Although I did a plethora of activities in college, my assiduous efforts enabled me to succeed."
After: "Although I juggled many activities in college, I succeeded through persistent work."
Brainstorming
Writing an effective personal statement requires a bit of soul searching and reflection. The schools want to gain
from your essay some insight into your character and personality. It's difficult for most people to write about
themselves, especially something personal or introspective. If thoughtfully observed and answered, the following
suggestions and questions will yield material from which you can draw upon in writing your essay. Although the
questions are presented in categories, your responses will inevitably straddle the various groupings. This is as it
should be, since brainstorming is a very lateral process. Most important while completing these questions is that
you be sincere and enjoy yourself.
1. Perform a Self-Inventory of Your Unique Experiences, Major Influences, and Abilities
Background/Accomplishments: Personal
xiii. What's special, unique, distinctive, or impressive about you or your life story? What details of your life
(personal or family problems/history; any genuinely notable accomplishments, people, or events that have
shaped you or influenced your goals) might help the committee better understand you or help set you apart from
other applicants?
xiv. Have you had to overcome any unusual obstacles or hardships (e.g., economic, familial, physical) in your
life?
xv. Have you borne significant care-giving responsibilities for family members? For an ailing parent, a sibling, a
disabled or aging relative, a child? How has this impacted your academics? Your professional life? Your goals
and values?
xvi. (If you live in the U.S. but are not a native-born American) How did you deal with the challenges of moving to
the U.S. from your home? Did you experience culture shock? How did you adapt? What was most difficult for
you? What aspects of your new home did you enjoy the most?
xvii. If work experiences have consumed significant periods of time during your college years, what have you
learned (leadership or managerial skills, for example), and how has the work contributed to your personal
growth?
Background/Accomplishments: Academic
xviii. When did you originally become interested in this field? What have you since learned about it—and about
yourself—that has further stimulated your interest and reinforced your conviction that you are well suited to this
field? What insights have you gained?
xix. How have you learned about this field—through classes, readings, seminars, work or other experiences, or
conversations with people already in the field?
xx. Are there any gaps or discrepancies in your academic record that you should explain?
xxi. Can you recall a specific incident that convinced you that you had chosen the right career path?
Topic Selection
After brainstorming, you should have a lengthy list of potential topics to cover. Some essays that answer specific
questions will require only one topic, but for most general personal statements, you will want to discuss two to
four subjects. Occasionally, you can discuss a single experience at length if you're confident that the material
touches on the entire range of themes you need to convey. If you try to tackle more than four subjects, you are
probably treating each one in insufficient depth.
Use the following guide to help narrow down your topics.
Standing Out
Is your topic unique? It's hard to have something entirely new to say, but you should at least have a fresh take on
your topic. If you recognize a lack of originality in your ideas, try to be more specific and personal. The more
specific you get, the less likely that you will blend in with the essays of your competition.
What to Avoid
After you've determined that your topic meets the above criteria, you should check that it also avoids the
following pitfalls:
1. Resorting to gimmicks: While creativity is encouraged, there must be substance to make
your tactics worthwhile. Don't expect mere novelty to win you any points, and realize that you risk coming
across as frivolous. Also, there's a good chance that any gimmicks you come up with—writing a poem,
writing in the third person—have been done already.
2. Focusing on the negative: There is a separate section of this course dealing with how to
address negative aspects of your application. As far as your topic is concerned, the main idea should be
focused on your positive attributes. This does not mean, of course, that you shouldn't mention past
weaknesses that you have learned to overcome, as the emphasis there is still on the strength you
demonstrated.
3. Repeating information that's listed elsewhere in the application: We have already
mentioned this point, but it's worth making abundantly clear. Your topic should not merely be a list of
activities or synthesis of your resume. Rather, it should offer the kind of insight that only you can provide
in a personal manner.
4. Being too controversial: If you get a sympathetic reader, a controversial topic might help you
to stand out, but you risk offending others and severely hurting your chances. You would do better to
search for a topic that makes you unique without resorting to cheap shots or obvious cries for attention.
Seeking pity: You can describe misfortunes or a disadvantaged background, but do not use them as an excuse
for bad performances or to seek pity. Doing so not only could sound manipulative, but also means that you
haven't emphasized your strengths sufficiently. Thus, as in the case of weaknesses, you should bring up
obstacles in your past only to show how you have overcome them.
The best way to approach your personal statement is to imagine that you have five minutes with someone from
the admissions committee. How would you go about making the best case for yourself while holding the listener's
interest? What would you include and omit in your story? Figuring out the answer to these questions is critical to
successfully preparing an effective statement.
To arrive at these answers, you should begin by asking yourself some more specific questions:
• Why have I chosen to attend graduate school in this specific field, and why did I choose to apply to this
particular school's program?
• What are my qualifications for admission?
• What is special, unique, or impressive about my life story?
The answers will not necessarily come easily to you, but this exercise will have great practical benefit in readying
you to write an outstanding personal statement. By answering each question thoroughly, you will have given
much thought to yourself, your experiences, and your goals, thereby laying the groundwork for formulating an
interesting and persuasive presentation of your own personal story.
"First, they should tell me where they're coming from—what it is in their background that leads them to apply to a
program like ours. Second, they should tell me what it is they want to get out of our program. Third, I want to
know where they hope our program will eventually take them in their career." — The Woodrow Wilson School
of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University
"Usually a straight autobiography should be avoided, although interesting and pertinent autobiographical facts
should be included. But the statement should be more future-oriented than past-oriented. I don't really want the
story of a student's life (although there are exceptions) but rather plans for and a vision of the future." —
Graduate English Department, UCLA
"Mistakes? Dwelling on past accomplishments as opposed to describing future interests. The recitation of past
accomplishments, prizes won and scores gotten—all that kind of stuff—is helpful but at the stage when we're
reading the statement, we know all the applicants are highly qualified; that is almost beside the point. What we're
looking for at that stage is, again, some insight into how the student thinks, what sort of clarity of purpose he has
into one or more research areas." — Graduate Admissions Committee, Applied Mechanics, Civil
Engineering & Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology
Whereas some professional programs, particularly law schools, give applicants more freedom to discuss any
past experiences that may help them to stand out, graduate schools are chiefly interested in your past only as it
relates to your future. That said, if there are aspects of your background that would make you stand out, you
should still try to incorporate them into your discussion. Just be prepared to put in a little more thought and
analysis.
Research Interests
Read the instructions carefully: Sometimes schools will ask for a statement of purpose describing your specific
research interests in lieu of, or in addition to, a personal statement that emphasizes your character and qualities.
For these types of essays, you can assume that a faculty member will be reading your statement, but it should
still be accessible enough for a non-specialist to understand. Remember that such essays should also still aim to
engage the reader, in a way that conveys your own enthusiasm for the subject matter.
This applicant demonstrates the depth of her knowledge about her subject. To engage the reader, she identifies
specific problems that she hopes to investigate: "My junior year and private studies of Anglo-Saxon language and
literature have caused me to consider the question of where the divisions between folklore, folk literature, and
high literature lie. Should I attend your school, I would like to resume my studies of Anglo-Saxon poetry, with
special attention to its folk elements." The essay is not scholarly, but it offers a glimpse of her intellectual
character and proves the maturity of her goals.
Why Qualified?
Your academic performance will play the most significant role in exhibiting to the admissions committee your
qualification for admission. However, the personal statement gives you the opportunity to analyze your
background and offer the insight and interpretation that you want your readers to take away from your
application.
The best way to prove your qualification is to discuss concrete experiences that show your abilities and
qualities.Details about the process are paramount. What we mean by the "process" is the path to
achievement. The rest of the application has already summarized your accomplishments and activities. Show the
reader what you did in concrete terms, and most importantly, highlight your active roles.
The experiences that demonstrate your qualification are not necessarily distinct from those that explain your
motivation. You shouldn't plan on dividing the essay into two separate sections for each, but rather organize the
structure by topic and extrapolate insights as they develop. We will cover structure in greater depth in its own
section, but it is important that you begin thinking in terms of an integrated essay.
Research Experience
The best way to demonstrate your qualification for graduate school is to focus on research experience, since
research will be your main job for the duration of your studies. Be specific about what you did. If you worked for a
year under a professor, you might consider emphasizing one particular project and exploring that in depth. The
experience does not have to have been a major undertaking: Any practical experience can be used as long as
you demonstrate your enthusiasm and aptitude for the field of study.
Remember to keep the discussion personal. Do not become bogged down in minute details and jargon.
Ultimately, the focus of the story should remain on you and your growth or success.
This applicant cites specific projects to demonstrate both the growth of his interest in psychology research and
the skills he has honed in the process. Note, in the third paragraph, that he does not jump to the end result of
presenting his paper at a conference. Rather, he shows the work he did—the active role he played—to make that
accomplishment possible. Moreover, he concludes this paragraph not with a final word about his research, but
with an explanation of what he has gained: "Again, I was involved in all aspects of the experiment, from typing
the protocol and administering it to the subjects, to analyzing the data and finally presenting my results."
Field Experience
If the program you're applying to is more practice-oriented, then demonstrating real-world experience can be just
as important as academic pursuits.
This applicant is applying to a computer science program, and he has a couple years of work experience. He
explains one specific achievement as follows: "As an MS student at DePaul University, I worked as a network
support technician and project manager for Information Services. My most significant accomplishment in this
capacity involved the re-wiring of over a thousand dormitory rooms to enable the students to have Internet
access with a link to the other four campuses. In doing so, I had to investigate the existing needs of a high-speed
Internet network, as well as the transport of bandwidth to support future demands, which are almost impossible to
determine." He starts by describing the end result, which in this case is acceptable because he poses it almost as
a challenge that he faced, and then he proceeds to explain the concrete tasks he had to perform. In this
applicant's case, it's clear that citing academic work could not prove the same level of skill that he has done by
drawing on real-world experiences.
Extracurricular Activities
It is very possible to demonstrate the relevant qualities you possess for graduate school through extracurricular
activities. The approaches you take will essentially be the same as those we discussed in the above two
sections, Field Experience and Unrelated Work Experience, depending on whether the activity is related or not.
In the Library Service case cited above, for example, the applicant was drawing on volunteer rather than work
experiences, but the purposes were the same.
Why Unique?
You cannot rely on uniqueness to outweigh a mediocre academic record, but it can often give you an edge.
Admissions officers are interested in assembling a diverse class of unique perspectives, so you should highlight
rather than downplay your differences. To an extent, all types of diversity will help, but you should aim to focus on
how unique aspects of your background will enable you to contribute to the academic community.
The purpose of this lesson is to show you examples of how other people capitalized on their unique qualities.
When it comes to your own essay, only you can identify the optimal strategy for making yourself stand out. One
way to start is to look over your answers to the brainstorming questions and try to find aspects of your
background that separate you from your peers. Ultimately, however, what will make the difference is your ability
to assess yourself honestly and thoughtfully.
The examples that follow are not meant to be exhaustive. Rather, they represent the efforts of particular
individuals to recognize the unique elements of their background and use them to their advantage. You should
notice that these unique elements are often directly related to their academic interests, but can still be tied
effectively to the applicants' goals or integrated with their character and background.
This applicant starts by noting the diversity of his ethnic and religious background. When mentioning such points,
you should not assume that such diversity is an end in itself. Rather, you should show how your background and
culture have shaped your perspective and given you something unique to offer. This applicant does a good job of
noting how Zoroastrianism has given him guiding principles, but he never follows through to discuss concrete
examples. This essay would have benefited from more details to show his diversity in more tangible terms.
This applicant's story is fascinating, at times harrowing, and ultimately triumphant. From committed social
activism to drug and alcohol addiction to a reengagement with the world, the author pulls no punches in telling his
unique tale. While he does not whitewash his experience with drugs and alcohol, notice how he situates it in a
larger context, showing both how it made him oblivious to the things he really cared about (Third World injustices)
and how his reintroduction to those things helped him pull himself out of his downward spiral. In doing so, he
demonstrates both a strong social conscience and a dedication to his beliefs. Additionally, his story makes him
very hard for an admissions committee to forget. Just be careful that any discussion of past mistakes or
difficulties leads to an indubitably positive conclusion.
This applicant shows that you do not need to be a true one-of-a-kind to demonstrate uniqueness in the
admissions process. In fact, what sets him apart is a rather typical job in the computer industry. What makes his
application unique, however, is that he is applying to a geological sciences program. His interest in mathematical
modeling gives him a novel area of specialization to offer to the intellectual diversity of the program.
Finally, this applicant shows that a personal, revealing story can be enough to set someone apart. By recounting
a particular episode that sparked her epiphany as a writer, she gives us an in-depth look at her unique approach
to her craft. Again, this essay does not discuss exotic experiences, but instead succeeds by painting a detailed,
deeply personal portrait that no one else could have written.
Explain Blemishes
Certain parts of your application may call for an explanation. Such aspects might include any of the following:
• Undergraduate grades
• Entrance exam scores
• Deficiency in the number of letters of recommendation submitted
• Lack of work experience
• Lack of extracurricular activities
• Why you are applying again after being denied previously
• Gaps in the chronological account of your education or employment
• Disciplinary action by an institution of higher education
• Criminal record
Under what circumstances should you use your personal statement to explain a particular deficiency, weakness,
or other blemish? First of all, the application might explicitly invite you to explain deficiencies, weaknesses,
aberrations, or any other aspect of the application that might not accurately reflect your abilities or potential and
fitness for graduate study. Schools almost without exception ask specifically about the last two items above
(seeDisclosing Skeletons in Your Closet below). Although most applications do not explicitly provide room for
such explanations of the other items, the schools nevertheless permit and generally encourage applicants to
provide brief explanations. Most schools suggest that you attach an addendum to your personal statement for
this purpose while reserving the personal statement itself for positive information about yourself. If you are in
doubt about the policy and preferred procedure of a particular school, contact the school directly.
Another point you should keep in mind is whether you have a valid reason. Staying up late the night before the
GRE is not a legitimate reason for a bad performance, while documented sickness could be. A particularly bad
semester could be explained by a death or illness in the family. If you lack research experience, you might point
out the number of hours you had to work to make college more affordable for you and your family.
There are many more gray areas. For example, is it worth noting that you simply have a bad history of
standardized testing? Doing so tactfully (in other words, don't rail against the arbitrariness of tests or demand the
right to be considered for your grades alone) can help the schools understand your exact situation, but it most
likely won't have a substantial effect on their perspective, since they know to take into account the imprecision of
standardized tests. What about the class for which you simply did not grasp the material, or a sub-par GPA
during your freshman year? Again, what you have to say won't constitute an extenuating circumstance, since
everyone has weaknesses and faces the same challenge of adjusting to college. Your best approach might be to
try to transform such blemishes into something positive by pointing out particular courses in which you performed
well, especially those that were more advanced, more relevant to your intended career path, or more recent.
Finally, make sure that you do not take a contentious tone. Don't accuse your teachers of unfair grading
standards or complain about lack of extracurricular opportunities at your school. Be clear that you're not trying to
excuse yourself of responsibility, but emphasize that you simply want the schools to have the complete picture.
This applicant clarifies one aberrant semester by explaining his decision to switch majors. Everyone recognizes
the rigors of the pre-med curriculum, so his justification seems legitimate. Although it's not essential to include a
positive statement when explaining blemishes, notice that the following sentence helps to ensure that the reader
will not conclude that the applicant is making excuses or protesting too much: "The difficulty I faced in that
advanced history course and in maintaining my status in chemistry and ecology courses affected my grades for
the semester, but was a crucible out of which emerged a renewed love for and pursuit of the study of history
throughout the rest of my college education." Moreover, it's important that he can point to an upward trend—"I
proceeded to improve my cumulative grade point average in each successive semester"—as evidence that this
poor semester was indeed an aberration.
At face value, the chronological approach seems great for all parties involved. The writer has the easy job of
reconstructing his personal history precisely as it happened; the reader can follow the resulting piece with little
effort. It's very possible that a chronological essay will turn out to be ideal for your material because your life
unfolded in a way that complements your themes, but you should not feel bound to tell your story in the order in
which it happened. Here are some specific pitfalls of which you should be aware:
1. You may be including too much: If you start with "I was born on..." and proceed to recite your
life's history, you've probably included a great deal of unnecessary information.
2. Your essay might be boring and monotonous: The most enjoyable essays have a sense of
drama, which usually requires a more creative structure. Perhaps the introductory paragraph sets up
some problem, and the subsequent paragraphs detail attempts to solve that problem. On the other hand,
a chronological structure seems inherently like a list.
3. You show less thought and effort: It's obvious to the reader when an essay has been crafted
with care and insight. Chronological essays might seem too effortless if there's no authorial imprint.
4. You separate naturally related points: A thematically structured essay puts related points
together and allows them to build upon each other. Unless your life developed along thematic lines, a
chronological essay would sacrifice the synergy that juxtaposing these points would create.
Overarching Themes
The reason we start with themes is the same reason we suggested you start your brainstorming by thinking
about your long-term vision. The overarching theme you decide on will inform the manner in which you organize
the rest of your content. This theme is analogous to the thesis of an academic essay, though it's often less
explicitly stated.
When we use the term "theme," we mean something that usually has multiple layers. A strong essay will never
boil down to a statement as simple as the following: "My reason for pursuing a graduate degree is X." That kind
of theme would invite a repetitive structure that merely includes a series of paragraphs offering evidence for a
single point. Instead, your theme should introduce complexities, as in the following: "While Experience A
demonstrates my commitment to B Aspect of my chosen field, Experience C drives me toward Objective D."
There are essentially two ways to set forth your theme. The first is to bring it up in the introduction, usually at the
end of the first paragraph. At this stage, since you haven't explored your concrete evidence, the theme should
subtly indicate the direction the essay will take rather than try to tell the whole story.
The second approach is to ensure a strong flow between paragraphs, connecting each point with previous ones
so the underlying theme gradually emerges. Then the conclusion wraps these individual themes together and
includes some kind of encapsulation of the material that preceded it. Below we will use examples to illustrate
these two tactics:
The theme of this essay comes at the end of the first paragraph: "Although I look back on these activities today
with some chagrin, I realize they did help me to develop, at an early age, a sense of concern for social and
political issues and a genuine desire to play a role." At this point, the writer is referring to specific activities that he
somewhat regrets, but this sets the tone for a running contrast between internal struggles and outward concerns.
The next two paragraphs discuss the writer's battles with addiction. Then the applicant shows how his emotional
recovery coincides with a growing awareness of political issues: "During the last years of my addiction I was
completely oblivious to the world around me. Until 1983 I didn't even realize that there had been a revolution in
Nicaragua or that one was going on in El Salvador. Then I rejoined the Quaker Meeting, in which I had been
raised as a child, and quickly gravitated to its Peace and Social Order Committee. They were just then initiating a
project to help refugees from Central America, and I joined enthusiastically in the work."
What makes this theme sophisticated is that it does not merely state, "I am concerned about Third World
economic development." Rather, it ties social concerns to issues of personal development and creates a
coherent portrait of a multifaceted individual. The Upfront Approach is effective in this case because it helps us to
see where the writer is going when he delves into his history of addiction and prevents an overly negative
undertone.
This essay does not give away much in the opening paragraph. The writer's first paragraph serves as a distinct
point rather than establishing a framework for the rest of the essay. The next three paragraphs each also have
independent points: the intersection of computers and geology, his coursework experience, and his career goals.
Effective topic sentences help to ensure a strong underlying flow. For example, in the third paragraph, the writer
identifies structural geology as an area of interest and an area in which he has some background, after
describing in the second paragraph how he would apply his computer expertise to that field.
Although there is an implicit overarching theme emerging, the writer waits until the conclusion to make that
explicit: "My decision to focus on math and science as an undergraduate and to explore the computer industry
after college has equipped me with a unique set of strengths to offer this program. The depth of my interest in
geology has only grown in my time away from academia, and although I have identified several possible areas of
specialization through prior studies, I look forward to contributing my fresh perspective on all subjects." As you
can see, this theme does not lend itself to a one-sentence synthesis because the various points are broader.
Nevertheless, this conclusion helps to connect these points for the reader, so he or she can walk away with a
clear formulation of what he or she has just learned.
Whether you choose the Upfront or Gradual approach depends on the nature of your
overarching theme and the substance it encompasses. When, as in the first example, there is a
more defined framework that lends itself to succinct expression, you can provide more
direction at the beginning and make a more focused point. But if your topic is broader and
your ideas need to be developed before being tied together, then you should let them unfold
naturally and save the integration for a nice, forceful ending. Whichever route you choose,
make sure your theme is multi-layered and sophisticated. Any oversimplification would not
do justice to your candidacy.
Organization
The purpose of this section is not to delineate one structural approach that will work for everyone's individual
essays, but rather to discuss principles of organization that should guide you in constructing your argument. In
previous sections, we have cautioned that the criteria we set forth could not be used as steps to be followed,
because there was so much overlap and interdependence. Here your task grows even more challenging,
because some of the principles can be mutually exclusive, and you may have to decide between them to
determine which approach best suits your material.
Hierarchy of Evidence
Because your reader will be reading quickly and looking for the main points, it is often a good idea to start with
your strongest evidence. You may even highlight your most interesting experience in the introduction.
This applicant decides to open with some comments on her ethnic and religious background. Although this is
neither an accomplishment nor directly related to her intended field, the writer correctly recognizes that it is a
unique element that will distinguish her from other candidates. By establishing this point early on, she
immediately has the reader interested in learning more about her. Unfortunately, as we noted in another section,
the applicant does not go on to illustrate how her diverse background has influenced her life through more
concrete examples.
Showing Progress
This approach might invite a chronological order, but we maintain that chronology should not be reason in itself
(as explained in the sidebar of the Essay Structures introduction) to organize material in a particular manner. The
guiding principle here is to structure your evidence in a way that demonstrates your growth, from a general initial
curiosity to a current definite passion, or from an early aptitude to a refined set of skills. It differs from the
Hierarchy of Evidence approach because your strongest point might come at the end, but its strength lies
precisely in the sense of culmination that it creates. Chronology might not apply if you choose to show progress
within a number of self-contained areas, thereby combining this approach with the Juxtaposing Themes
approach described later.
This applicant chronicles the evolution of her interest in library service. The progress she describes is not merely
a matter of accumulating one experience after another, but rather a process of enrichment by which she learns
from fresh perspectives, adding new layers each time. In the second paragraph she discusses her work for a
nonprofit organization, emphasizing her interest in "gathering information" and "using human relations skills" to
show how this experience is relevant to her current goals. The following paragraph discusses her role as a
column writer for that same organization, at which point she states a more defined issue that has caught her
attention: "Through this experience I have seen a vivid contrast between the substantive quality of information
formally prepared—with the discipline and rigor of a traditional publishing and review schedule and with clear
authorship—and the casual unstructured nature of electronic bulletin board postings, faxes, e-mail, and other
products of newer technologies." As a result, we see the level of depth that she has reached in her peripheral
investigation of the dynamics of information.
In writing this essay, the writer moves effectively from experience to experience; the result does not feel like a list
or a haphazard construction, but rather a logically flowing piece. Moreover, the applicant's points in the final two
paragraphs have more force because we have witnessed a process of growth. Her individual ideas combine to
have a synergistic effect.
Juxtaposing Themes
The strongest argument against a straight chronological order is the value of juxtaposing related themes and
ideas. If two experiences are closely related but occurred years apart, it makes more sense to develop them as
one set of ideas than to interrupt them with unrelated points.
This applicant uses the first three paragraphs to establish his goals in public service. In the third paragraph, he
offers some childhood anecdotes, then jumps to present career interests. What unites these two chronologically
separated points is the connection between his early "humanitarian kindness to animals" and his desire to
provide "health care to 44 million uninsured Americans."
The four subsequent paragraphs cover all the ground in between these two points, describing his practical
experience in politics. Thus, the opening three paragraphs form a self-contained unit, and although the essay as
a whole is not linear, there is a definite logic to grouping his ideas in the way that he did.
Dramatic Appeal
Not all essays will have potential in this area, but if you've undergone dramatic experiences, then you should by
all means set your essay up to reflect that. The most effective way to accomplish this is to use the introduction to
sketch some kind of problem or question, and then use each subsequent paragraph to engage with that problem
until a resolution is gradually reached.
In his opening paragraph, this applicant sets the reader up for a compelling tale that we immediately understand
will entail a good bit of hardship and difficulty. It is clear that at the beginning of his story, the writer is preparing to
head down the wrong path. As readers, we are interested to see where he goes and how he rediscovers his
proper direction. Through use of specific detail, he effectively conveys both the attraction of a musician's lifestyle
and its more unpleasant side. While he takes us step by step through his progress as a musician (and his parallel
failure as a student), notice how he has already planted the seeds of his ultimate rejection of this lifestyle in the
first paragraph with his description of the older musicians who populate the scene. He returns to this image at his
point of transition, saying, "I came to realize that I was well on my way to becoming one of those bitter old
burnouts that I used to play with when I was in high school." He has built the tension nicely, and then offered a
resolution that brings a sense of closure to that period of his life. In his final paragraph, it is clear that he is ready
to make a fresh start.
Narratives
Stories can be the heart of your essay—if you handle them effectively. Below are some tips on how to maximize
their value.
What to Include
The basic rule here is the same as always: include specific details. The purpose of using stories is to illustrate
your points with concrete evidence, thereby giving your ideas force and context. Telling one specific story
enables you to achieve depth and convey personality beyond what you could achieve in brief, isolated
descriptions. It's not enough, however, merely to decide to include a story. Some writers will start on the right
track but end up conveying nothing meaningful. For example, they might name a specific personal incident and
then jump to generic conclusions without demonstrating anything substantive about their character. Here are
some more specific tips that have come up in other contexts but are especially important for stories:
1. Show Active Contribution: Many people tell stories in which the payoff is a lesson learned.
While this can have some value, it does not say as much about your character because you are only
responding passively.
2. Emphasize the Process: Don't set up a problem and jump to the solution. Show us the
process of reaching that solution. Give details about your approach and your reasoning.
3. Paint a Vivid Picture: Try to draw the reader into your story by including details that bring the
story alive. One effective way to accomplish this is to think visually. Of course, you should not get carried
away and go down tangents or become monotonous. For example, if you're recalling a conversation,
don't bother recounting all the pleasantries with which it began.
Gleaning Insights
Anecdotes should serve some clear purpose, but you have to be careful about sounding contrived. One common
mistake is to start citing lessons before you've finished the story. This kind of interruption adulterates the force of
the story itself. Be careful that your insights flow naturally from the details of your anecdote: stay close to your
personal story and avoid making grand pronouncements based on a minor episode.
An Example
To put the above suggestions in more concrete terms, we will analyze one actual essay from a critical
perspective. First, this applicant tells an anecdote that's relatively recent, but still serves to illustrate the origin of
her interest in creative writing. Note that the anecdote is largely concerned with the past, and even in her
reminiscences, she uses vivid, concrete details. For example, she invokes the past she shared with her peers,
"fellow veterans of plaid uniforms and daily masses." To demonstrate her inexperience, she reflects, "The only
readings I'd done before a crowd were Paul's letters to the Ephesians and the occasional Responsorial Psalm—
and that wasn't my writing on the line."
There's no real place for emphasizing contribution, per se, since this isn't a project or accomplishment. On the
other hand, the writer does do an effective job of showing the process: "I grew more nervous as I sat there that
night, listening to poem after poem on angst and ennui. I couldn't imagine how the students and faculty around
me, who were all listening intently with properly contorted faces, would respond to my grotesque little girl. But I
stood up and read a passage, a little shaky at first." Thus she does not simply jump to the point of receiving
congratulations. Instead, she provides specific details that not only help us to empathize with her, but also make
the results seem more meaningful.
She allows the story to develop on its own terms, instead of interrupting its flow with forced interpretations. The
insight she draws comes only in the next paragraph: "At that reading, I realized I could write things that made
people laugh—not just friends who felt obligated, but complete strangers. I really liked that feeling, and it's the
promise of that laughter that motivates me to continue writing." The flow from story to insights is natural and
fitting.
Paragraphs
As in the case of those that include narratives, most of your paragraphs will have the same underlying structure.
You begin with a transition, you offer supporting evidence, and you offer a resolution. Supporting evidence for the
most part affects the strength of individual paragraphs, but transitions and resolutions are even more crucial
because they affect the coherence and impact of the essay as a whole. The beginnings and endings of each
paragraph are the places to draw connections between experiences, demonstrate progression, and highlight your
key themes.
Not every paragraph you write will have these three distinct parts, but it's worthwhile to look at how typical
paragraphs are structured so you know how to evaluate your essay on this level.
Transitions
The basic purpose of a transition is to serve as a topic sentence; it should give enough direction so the reader
knows what to expect. When your essay is following not only a chronological order but also a single train of
thought, the paragraphs may flow smoothly anyway. For example, in this essay, note the ways in which
paragraphs 3-5 begin: with clear references to time, continuing the account of the writer's recovery from
addiction. The step-by-step process is therefore logical and easy to follow.
The topic sentence has more work to do when you move from theme to theme or experience to experience. The
reader has to know where you're going next. This applicant prefaces her fifth paragraph as follows: "I also gained
valuable research experience during my sophomore year by working twenty hours a week as a behavior therapist
with autistic pre-school-aged children at the Children's Behavior Therapy Unit (CBTU)." The sentence sounds
natural, a distinct idea in itself but also one that intimates what is to follow. Note that the transition is smooth
because it takes a step back and makes a somewhat general point. If she had skipped the first half of the
sentence and instead jumped to saying, "I worked twenty hours a week," we would not know that the topic of the
paragraph was her research experience. Jumping too abruptly to a new point leaves the reader lost in the gap.
The strongest transitions will not only introduce the ensuing material but will also draw connections to prior
paragraphs. These connections can note both similarities and differences. The link does not even have to be
intrinsic to the subjects themselves. For example, this applicant compares the breadth of his interests to the
concentration of his strengths: "Although my strengths are concentrated in these areas, my curiosity is by no
means limited to these topics." Thus, after discussing specific research areas, he makes a transition to other
topics by noting the broader scope of his curiosity. This is one of the most basic transitions you can use when
there's no obvious link between the two topics.
Of course, you should seek more in-depth transitions to strengthen the forcefulness of your points. This
applicantuses this transition to show how the experience he's about to describe builds on previous points: "As a
result of the in-depth exposure to networks I gained in the dormitory project, I was well prepared for the
challenges that awaited me as the manager of Information Services at the Transportation Center at Northwestern
University." Now we are reminded that the previous paragraph demonstrated the "in-depth exposure to networks"
he had gained, and we see that the ensuing paragraph will continue to describe the progress he has made.
What Not to Do
The most common mistake—other than not including transitions at all—is to rely on words like "also" or "further,"
which don't provide any thematic link. Using such substance-less transitions makes your essay sound like a list
instead of a logical argument. For example:
Bad: "Doing research for my departmental adviser also provided a great deal of useful experience."
Good: "Although classroom debates sparked my interest in this obscure area, the chance to do hands-on
research for my departmental adviser exposed me to the detail-oriented nature of academic inquiry."
Whenever possible, you should aim to create transitions with as much depth as this one has. When you can
make a substantive statement both about what's to follow and what preceded, then you not only ensure a smooth
flow, but you also reiterate and highlight your key themes.
Supporting Evidence
While the transition statement can be general to orient the reader, your very next sentence should be specific.
The movement within each paragraph should be from specific to general, rather than vice versa. There are two
main reasons for this approach: 1) The reader will be more interested in the specifics of your situation than in
generic, broad themes; 2) You can draw much more interesting, in-depth insights after you have laid out the
evidence. The principles here are therefore the same as for stories.
Consider the following paragraph, taken from this essay:
"As a result of my experiences in the dormitory project, I was well prepared for the challenges that awaited me as
the manager of Information Services at the Transportation Center at Northwestern University. My primary task
was to build a state-of-the-art network infrastructure that would support a leading graduate research center in the
transportation field. In a succinct and convincing manner, I had to demonstrate my vision in building the
foundation and developing the budget, as well as managing the project, purchasing, installation and finally,
deployment of my plan. My success in leading this project and utilizing the newly installed technical tools to
empower the Center's goals led to the realization of similar goals and projects in a corporate environment."
The reader-friendly orientation comes in the first sentence, but immediately after, the writer focuses on the details
of his experience: the nature of his task and the roles he fulfilled. Only in the final sentence does he begin to
expand to the broader lesson. Looking at this example, you might think that this is the natural, obvious approach,
and it seems that way because it works so seamlessly. But writers who aren't conscious of what they're doing will
often go the exact opposite route. Their paragraph might include something like the following as the second
sentence: "In this position, I learned many valuable skills while refining my career vision."
Writers who make this mistake will be wise enough to keep the resolution at the end, but they'll state a general
point closer to the top. Their reasoning is that the big lesson needs to be highlighted, but they don't realize that
bringing it up prematurely gives it less weight and in turn downplays the uniqueness of their personal details.
Resolutions
It's a shame to see a paragraph with vivid, powerful details end on a flat note, but that's precisely what happens
even in otherwise strong essays. The challenge is to say something both meaningful and personal. Most
resolutions are too broad and superficial.
The other mistake that writers tend to make is just to state the obvious. For example, every paragraph will end
with some form of the following: "This experience reaffirmed my passion for history." Such a poor attempt not
only hurts the impact of the paragraph but also makes the writer appear simple-minded and superficial.
This applicant concludes a paragraph on her experience with a nonprofit organization as follows: "My experience
helping women access breast-feeding information and empowering them to use that information has convinced
me that information alone is not nearly as useful as information plus a skilled guide." What makes this resolution
effective is that it makes a clear, meaningful point that is closely tied to the evidence presented within the
paragraph.
Ultimately, your approach to writing resolutions should follow the same basic principles you use for other areas:
be detailed, personal, specific, and concrete. The additional challenge arises from the fact that you also must
speak to some broader significance, and it's tempting either to get carried away and write too generically, or to
take the easy way out and conclude with something superficial.
In a sense, the advice covered in this section is remedial. We're trying to teach you to avoid the common
mistakes of bad writing. The goal is to achieve a clean, readable, and enjoyable piece of writing. Very few writers
in the entire applicant pool will have the kind of style that will make them stand out on the strength of writing
alone.
Developing such a style requires time and investment, and some may argue that it can't be taught. If you want to
undertake a more long-term investment in your writing aptitude, here are some tips:
1. Immerse Yourself in Good Writing: Read publications like The New Yorker and Atlantic
Monthly. Even without conscious effort, your writing will improve because you will begin to think in more
vivid language.
2. Imitate Good Writers: Try a broad range of styles, from Faulkner to Hemingway. This will get
you thinking about writing on a higher level and prepare you to forge your own voice as you begin to
master the nuances of language.
3. Keep a Journal: No matter what you choose to write about, your writing will improve simply
because you're practicing the craft. Keep to a steady schedule.
4. Become a Good Editor: Whether you're rewriting your own piece or someone else's, the
process of editing will help you learn to pay attention to subtleties and keep an eye on the big picture.
5. Have Your Work Critiqued by Professionals: Using a service such as EssayEdge's will not
only help you improve the essay you submit, but will also teach you to recognize your general strengths
and weaknesses as a writer.
Sentence Variety
Inexperienced writers tend to use longer, more complex sentences because they think they demonstrate
intelligence. In contrast, strong writers know that a point is most forceful when it is conveyed concisely and
directly. Although the purpose of this section is to teach you to improve on sentence variety, we also want you to
be aware that simplicity should be your ultimate goal. Sophisticated thoughts will require complex sentences, but
you should never complicate a simple idea for the sake of creating more intricate sentences.
Does this mean that the best essay will consist of all simple sentences? No. We stress this point only because
most people have a tendency to start with sentences that are more complex than necessary, because ideas don't
formulate themselves in our minds in the clearest, most direct structure. The best-written essays will feature
steady variation in sentence length—but again with no sentences forced into a more complex mode.
Simplifying
The first step in simplifying is to identify what needs to be fixed. Usually the problem comes from trying to cram
too many points into one sentence and using too many auxiliary clauses. Consider the following two sets of
examples:
BEFORE: To this program I will bring a determined spirit, coupled with a strong background in research and
volunteer work, which I pursued with energy and a focus on the future that grows ever closer to being within
reach.
AFTER: I have pursued all my research and volunteer work with relentless energy and clear focus. To this
program I will bring the same sense of determination that has made my once distant goals now close within my
reach.
The total word count remains the same, but the ideas are now much clearer and more fully fleshed out.
BEFORE: Having long been interested in a career in law, which will allow me to combine my analytical thinking
skills with the pursuit of social justice, I now feel that I have accumulated the necessary experience and
education to begin a formal pursuit in this field, with X school offering the best curriculum for my needs.
AFTER: A career in law will allow me to combine my analytical thinking skills with the pursuit of social justice.
Having accumulated the necessary experience and education, I now look forward to pursuing my long-held
interest in law at X school, which offers the best curriculum for my needs.
OVERSIMPLIFIED: A career in law will allow me to combine my analytical thinking skills with the pursuit of social
justice. I have accumulated the necessary experience and education. I now look forward to pursuing my long-
held interest in law at X school. X school offers the best curriculum for my needs.
As you can see, the second version still includes a complex sentence, but separating one clause out makes the
ideas much clearer. We are not by any means advocating the extreme simplicity of the third version. It is
oversimplified not only because it sounds choppy, but because it has removed certain textual relationships that
were in the original—most importantly, "Having accumulated — I now look forward."
Varying Constructions
Sentence variety is not just a matter of length; a well-paced piece of writing will vary its sentence constructions as
well. Everyone can recognize what's wrong with the following:
"I walked into the room. The patient looked up at me. I greeted him with a smile. His eyes brightened."
Most people, however, would write something like the following without realizing their error:
"Having entered the room, I saw the patient look up at me. Sensing his discomfort, I tried to ease his concerns by
greeting him with a smile. Appreciating my gesture, he responded with glowing eyes."
Every sentence starts with a present participle (a verb + "ing" —> adjective), states the subject, and gives the
predicate. The following is a revision:
"I saw the patient look up as I entered the room. Sensing his discomfort, I tried to ease his concerns by greeting
him with a smile. Although his brightening eyes showed that he appreciated my gesture, pain prevented him from
responding any further."
The first sentence now starts with the subject, and the third sentence introduces a new kind of dependent clause
with the conjunction "although."
If you have trouble finding ways to vary your sentence constructions, try some of the following basic
ideas:
Combine two short sentences into one compound sentence:
"The game had just started, and our seats gave us a perfect view."
1. Use prepositional phrases, and vary their location:
"With only an hour left to finish, I knew I had to focus."
"I knew I had to focus, with only an hour left to finish."
2. Use the many conjunctions available to you—however, when, while, as, because, for,
since, although, though—and vary their location:
Word Choice
Whenever possible, use the shorter, simpler word.
You can use a thesaurus to jog your memory when you're trying to come up with a better synonym, but never use
a word with which you aren't already familiar. Words often have connotations and nuances of meaning that you
can appreciate only after having seen them in context, so you're taking a great risk if you use a word that you
don't know well.
Even if you do feel comfortable with more advanced vocabulary, you should use the simpler synonym if that
captures your meaning just as well. For example, instead of "ameliorated the situation," you could just as easily
say "improved the situation." On the other hand, a word like "exasperated" is more intense than a synonym like
"frustrated," and so you should use it if that's the sense you're trying to convey.
Verb Tense
The reason we are devoting nearly an entire section to tips on removing the passive voice from your writing is
that it is both a very common flaw and very easily correctable. Within this section we also will explain how to
choose more active language even when passive voice is not involved.
Defining Passive Voice
Passive voice occurs when the subject and object of an action are inverted, so the subject is the recipient of the
act instead of its performer. For example:
Passive: The man was bitten by the dog.
Active: The dog bit the man.
Passive: I was told by my teacher to come at noon.
Active: My teacher told me to come at noon.
Note that the word "by" is present in these two examples. A sentence can be passive without the word "by," but it
is always at least implied. For example: "I was given bad directions [by my friend]."
Passive voice always involves a to be verb. To be verbs include am, are, been, being, is, was, were. On the other
hand, a sentence can include a to be verb without being passive. For example:
• "I have been involved in this organization for several years."
• "He is leaving in five minutes."
Later we will discuss ways to avoid to be verbs even when they are not in passive-voice constructions.
Awkward alternative: The general public refers to him as "the great one."
Case 2: for the fifth time this year, a pitch hit Johnson.
Awkward alternative: For the fifth time this year, a pitch hit Johnson.
Tone
Tone is broadly described as the author's attitude toward his or her subject. It can be passionate, distant, angry,
and lighthearted, among many other possibilities. Unfortunately there are too many possibilities for us to cover,
and without knowing your subject, we cannot give the most specific advice possible. The obvious pitfalls include
sounding condescending or frivolous, while sounding energetic and enthusiastic is a definite positive.
Although we cannot be more detailed about these specific approaches, there are still important general lessons
to convey. In this section we will teach you how to strike a balance between sounding too casual and too formal.
Then we will discuss ways to achieve the confident, energetic tone for which all writers should strive.
Too Casual
The danger in writing too casually is that you might come across as someone who does not take the application
process seriously enough. When we say that you should be conversational, you should think in terms of an
interview conversation. In other words, the situation is serious, but your words sound natural and not
overwrought. Writing that is too informal would be the language you use when chatting with friends.
Some examples include the use of colloquialisms, sentence fragments, or slang. The following should illustrate a
clear problem:
"The way I look at it, someone needs to start doing something about disease. What's the big deal? People are
dying. But the average person doesn't think twice about it until it affects them. Or someone they know."
Too Formal / Detached
More people err on the side of being too formal, because they take the quality of being professional to an
extreme. They forget that this is a personal and not an academic essay. For example, some people even try to
write about themselves without using the first person, because they were taught in high school English that "I" is
anathema.
Generally the problem of sounding too formal goes along with detaching oneself from one's subject. Some writers
will try to write too objectively or as though they were trying to provide logical evidence for a thesis. Consider this
before-and-after example:
Before: There was a delay in the start of the project, attributable to circumstances beyond the control of all
relevant parties. Progress came to a standstill, and no one was prepared to undertake the assessment of the
problem and determination of the solution. An unexpected shift in roles placed this duty on myself.
After: The project got off to a late start due to circumstances beyond our control. We could not move forward,
and no one stepped forward to take the lead in figuring out what went wrong. Despite my junior status, I decided
to undertake this challenge.
The second version clearly sounds more natural, and the uses of "our," "we," and "I" make the reader sense that
the writer has a more personal stake in the problem. There are several differences worth noting.
1. The second version is shorter. Writing in excessively formal language often requires more
words, such as "beyond the control of all relevant parties" vs. "beyond our control."
2. The second version avoids two to be verbs and replaces them with more active ones.
3. The first version turns words that are usually verbs into nouns: "determination" and
"assessment." This adds a definite stiffness to the writing.
4. The second version uses phrases that sound conversational but not informal: "got off to a late
start" and "figuring out what went wrong." The line is fuzzy, but again, ask yourself if you would use these
phrases in an interview. The answer here should be yes, while "What's the big deal?" is a clear mistake.
5. Another example of the first version depersonalizing the issue is in the last sentence, which is
ambiguous. The new version does not rely on the vague phrase "an unexpected shift in roles" and has
the further benefit of making the writer sound more active in assuming leadership.
Sounding Confident
Within this category, we will also cover how to sound enthusiastic, positive, and passionate—in other words, the
basic qualities every essay should have regardless of its subject. We will go through some general guidelines
and offer before-and-after examples when appropriate:
1. Avoid phrases such as "I believe," "I feel," and "I think." Even worse are phrases that add
an adverb, such as "I strongly believe." Your tone will be much more confident if you just make the
statement without preface.
2. There is little value that can come from being negative, whether you are writing about a
weakness or a negative external situation. Downplay the negative aspects and emphasize the
positive.
Before: Our business has struggled since the whole market started its downturn, but we are staying
strong.
After: Despite a slowdown that has coincided with the market struggles, we have taken measures to
remain competitive and are beginning to reverse the downturn.
3. When you are trying to convey your enthusiasm about a subject, the language you use should
parallel your feelings. Stiff, deadened, and passive writing will contradict the passion you are claiming to
possess. Use action verbs to inject vigor into your writing, and of course, show rather than tell
whenever possible.
Before: Civil rights is an issue I feel strongly about. The legal field is closely related to this issue, and I
would like to use it as an avenue to effect change.
After: I have marched, demonstrated, and campaigned for the civil rights of all people. Now I hope to
tackle the systemic roots of the problem through a career in law.
4. Emphasize your active role. This point has come up so many times because it affects so
many aspects of your writing. Highlight the ways in which you actively contributed to a situation or to your
own progress. For example, if you were assigned an important project, you should point out that your
consistent quality of work earned you higher responsibilities.
Before: I was not sure what job to take next, but a great opportunity in health care administration came
up.
After: I explored a wide range of career possibilities and discovered an opportunity in health care
administration that intrigued me most.
A Note on Humor
Being funny in writing is very difficult, because the voice and exact context depend on the reader and are in a
sense beyond the writer's control. You could be a very funny person and nevertheless be unable to show that
side of you in writing. If you see potential for using humor, you should aim small. Do not expect big laughs by
being outrageous. Instead, aim to bring a smile to the reader's face by including a clever witticism.
Be careful that your tone does not come across as flippant or overly sarcastic. Slight irony is good, and self-
deprecating humor can be effective, because it shows that you do not take yourself too seriously.
Essay Clichés
In everyday language, clichés are simply common expressions that are an easy way to get one's point across.
For example, saying, "He really put his foot in his mouth" is a convenient way to make the point that "He said
something that he should now regret saying."
What's acceptable in spoken language can be offensive in writing. Good writing must be original: you should
always aim to state your ideas through engaging language and from a fresh perspective.
In addition to the general clichés of the English language, you have to watch out for those that are more specific
to the application essay. The challenge here is that these themes have become clichés precisely because they
are valuable and significant, so you don't want to ignore them. You simply have to find fresh ways to convey
hackneyed ideas. The best advice is to be as specific and personal as possible, thereby emphasizing your
uniqueness. The following is a list of some of the most egregious clichés, within the context of a bland statement:
"As I finished the race, I realized I had learned the value of hard work and appreciated the fact that I could
accomplish anything if I set my mind to it."
"Working in this atmosphere made me appreciate the value of diversity."
"With each member contributing something valuable to our purpose, I soon recognized the importance of
teamwork."
"As the young child embraced me in gratitude, I discovered the true value of making a difference in people's
lives."
"That summer in New York truly broadened my horizons."
There's no way to reword the above sentences to make them significantly stronger. The problem lies in the very
approach the hypothetical writer of those statements has taken. A reliance on clichés is usually indicative of
superficial ideas and telling instead of showing. The only way to improve upon the above sentiments would be to
enrich them with concrete details and add depth using a more personal perspective.
There is no approach more hackneyed than opening with a quotation. The ones we see at EssayEdge are almost
always just marginally clever expressions of the most obvious lessons about hard work, persistence, and fulfilling
one's dreams—often barely relevant to the rest of the essay. Occasionally, someone will find a quote that's worth
a pause, but even then the reader will not be impressed. The very sight of quotation marks at the beginning of
your essay may very well elicit a cringe or a sigh.
The admissions committee is far more interested in hearing what you have to say. If you happen upon a
fascinating or pithy quotation by another person, using it will not make your case for admission any more
compelling. In fact, an impatient reader might simply write you off as unoriginal. Additionally, quoting a
philosopher or Shakespeare will not make you appear well-read, because anyone can open Bartlett's Familiar
Quotations to find something that appears intelligent and insightful.
Finally, even quoting your grandmother or some other wise relative has been overdone. This is not to say that
you shouldn't use dialogue if you're describing a particular episode, but anything that sounds like an aphorism will
only make your essay seem trite, no matter how perfectly it sums up your theme.
Introductions
The introduction is the most important part of your essay, and its one purpose above all others is to draw in the
reader. Ideally, your introduction should grab the reader's attention right from the first sentence. If the introduction
can proceed to orient the reader to the focus of the essay, that can be very helpful. But orientation is not an
essential purpose because that can be achieved gradually throughout the course of the essay.
Many students make the mistake of over-explaining in the introductory paragraph what they will be talking about
in the rest of the essay. Such paragraphs may include something similar to the following: "My journey toward
graduate school has been shaped by a variety of experiences, including academic studies, volunteer work, and
extracurricular activities." This is quite simply a waste of time and space. The reader already knows that you will
be addressing these things and is most likely thinking, "Get to the point."
If your essay opens with a paragraph such as this, the best move would be to delete it. Often, your second
paragraph, which begins to discuss a specific experience, will work much better as an introduction. You may also
find that a later paragraph works even better. In general, you should bring your most compelling experience to
the forefront and then structure your essay around it.
The following is a list of possible approaches to the introduction, with an emphasis on the opening sentence
itself.
Jump Right In
Some people will start with a compelling experience but will insist on prefacing that experience with a very
generic statement such as: "From the first time I looked through a microscope, I knew that science was my
calling." Often, the reason people will open with such a statement is that they feel compelled to restate the
question in some way. This is unnecessary and more than likely to bore your reader right out of the gate. You
should be able to demonstrate your reasons without relying on such a bland summary sentence.
If, on the other hand, you are tempted to use the first sentence to explain context, you should respect the
reader's intelligence enough to save that context for later, once you have grabbed the reader's attention.
Consider the following example, taken from this essay:
"Perhaps the most important influence that has shaped the person I am today is my upbringing in a traditional
family-oriented Persian and Zoroastrian culture. My family has been an important source of support in all of the
decisions I have made, and Zoroastrianism's three basic tenets—good words, good deeds, and good thoughts—
have been my guiding principles in life."
Although the question asks the applicant to describe his influences, he need not restate that line. Moreover, he
can delay explaining the context of his upbringing. Review the following restructure, which grabs the reader's
attention more immediately and conveys the necessary context in time:
"Good words, good deeds, and good thoughts—these are the three basic Zoroastrian tenets that have shaped
my guiding principles. Indeed, my upbringing in a traditional Persian and Zoroastrian culture and all the family
support that entails have come to define me more than any other influence."
The advice to jump right in also applies to anecdotes. Rather than set the stage for a story with boring exposition,
beginning your essay with some interesting action is often an effective way to draw in your reader.
State a Problem
By stating a problem, you create instant curiosity because the reader will want to see how you address it. This
applicant actually opens with a rhetorical question, wasting no time. The remainder of the essay explores the
concept of "middleware" and its relevance to the applicant's career.
This applicant, on the other hand, deals with a more urgent social issue that has affected her personally. The
remainder of the essay does not purport to solve the problem, but rather to demonstrate her in-depth
understanding of it and the level of her commitment to her cause.
Instead of dealing with external issues, you can also discuss personal difficulties and how you have struggled
through them. There are many possibilities here, but what unites them is the element of drama, and you should
use that to your advantage in creating a strong lead.
Being Offbeat
This type of approach is risky, but because it has the potential to be so effective, it is worth considering. The
same warnings apply here that we enumerated for humor in the Tone section. Try to be subtly and creatively
clever rather than outrageous.
This applicant begins with a joke about his prospective institution: "You'd think I would have had my fill of Indiana
winters. But, here I am, applying to go back, ready to dig my parka out of storage. It's not like I've been gone long
enough to forget the cold, either. In some ways, I feel as if that permacloud is still hanging over me." The
introduction goes on to make some jokes about the applicant's potential concerns. These musings don't serve
much of a substantive purpose except to establish the writer's familiarity with the school. On the other hand, they
do make the reader more comfortable with the writer's style as he goes on to make more serious points.
Conclusions
The second most important part of your essay, behind only the introduction, is the conclusion. Just as the
introduction had the purpose of drawing in the reader, the conclusion's foremost function should be to leave the
reader with a lasting impression. This section offers guidelines on ways you can maximize the impact of that
impression. These guidelines can be grouped into three categories, each of which encompasses a lesson on
what not to do.
All writers rely on outside feedback. You may want to use friends, family, and teachers as an initial resource
before submitting your essay for more hands-on editing by EssayEdge. While the people you know can give you
valuable suggestions based on their relationship with you, EssayEdge offers a vital perspective in providing
objective criticism and expertise specific to the admissions essay.
The following is an evaluative questionnaire for you to give your readers along with the essay:
1. Did my opening paragraph capture your attention?
2. Did you find the statement as a whole to be interesting?
3. Did you find it to be well written?
4. Did it seem positive, upbeat?
5. Did it sound like me?
6. Do you regard it as an honest and forthright presentation of who I am?
7. Did it seem to answer the question(s)?
8. Can you think of anything relevant that I might have inadvertently omitted?
9. Is there material within the statement that seems inappropriate?
10. Did you gain any insight about me from reading this?
11. Did you notice any typos or other errors?
12. Do you think the statement has in any way distinguished me from other applicants?
Editing Checklist
The following checklist is divided into the basic categories that we used to organize this course: content,
structure, and style.
CONTENT
Are you answering the actual question given in the prompt?
Have you been sincere and personal?
Is your essay within the word limit?
Will your reader find the essay interesting?
Are you showing rather than telling?
Does your introduction grab the reader's attention?
Do you explore your experiences in sufficient depth?
Does your essay contain a high level of detail and concrete evidence?
Have you avoided unsubstantiated claims?
Do you offer specific, personal insights rather than trite generalizations and clichés?
Does your essay reveal anything meaningful about your character?
Do you avoid summarizing information that can be found elsewhere on your application?
Will your essay make you stand out?
Does your conclusion leave a lasting impression?
STRUCTURE
Can you identify an overarching theme? Have you articulated that theme in the essay?
Does your theme have multiple layers and genuine depth?
Do you have a reason for placing every paragraph where it is?
Do your paragraphs flow smoothly? Are there any gaps or jumps?
Does each point build upon previous points, or does your essay sound like a list?
Have you written insightful transitions and resolutions that highlight your key themes?
Are your stories well integrated into your essay?
Is the essay clear and coherent? Have you strengthened its impact by using the optimal structure?
STYLE
Have you achieved a simple, straightforward style?
Have you varied your sentence constructions?
Have you avoided unnecessarily fancy vocabulary?
Have you avoided passive voice?
Have you achieved active writing through the use of strong verbs?
Have you avoided overusing adjectives and adverbs?
Is your tone conversational, rather than too casual or too formal?
Have you conveyed confidence, enthusiasm, and passion?
Final Steps
Read Your Essay Out Loud: To help you polish the essay even further, read it out loud. You will be amazed at
the faulty grammar and awkward language that your ears can detect. This will also give you a good sense of the
flow of the piece and will alert you to anything that sounds too abrupt or out of place. Good writing, like good
music, has a certain rhythm. How does your essay sound? Is it interesting and varied or drawn out and
monotonous?
Have Your Essay Professionally Edited: Named "the world's premier application essay editing service" by The
New York Times, Essay Edge has helped more applicants write successful application essays than any other
company in the world. Please to have your essay professionally edited.
Congratulations!
You have completed the course. We wish you the best of luck throughout the application process.