ATRUCT
ATRUCT
PFR 13/02/2020
m
00
6.0
, 9
00
x6.0
16
IPE 360
S 275
7.000 m
4.500 m
HE 340 A
18.000 m
1. Design codes
2. Basic data
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 1
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 2
3.1. Materials
Steel: S 275 (EN1993-1-1, §3.2)
t<= 40 mm, Yield strength fy= 275 N/mm², Ultimate strength fu= 430 N/mm²
40mm<t<= 80 mm, Yield strength fy= 255 N/mm², Ultimate strength fu= 410 N/mm²
Modulus of elasticity E=210000 N/mm², Poisson ratio ν=0.30, Unit mass ρ= 7850 Kg/m³
4. Loads
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 2
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 3
qk=2.40kN/m qk=2.40kN/m
Load Qk (Imposed load)
S(α1)=μ1(α1)·Ce·Ct·Sk=0.800x1.000x1.000x2.000=1.600kN/m² μ1
S(α2)=μ1(α2)·Ce·Ct·Sk=0.800x1.000x1.000x2.000=1.600kN/m²
0° 15°30°45°60° α
Sk=9.96kN/m Sk=9.96kN/m
Load Qs1 (Snow load)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 3
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 4
Sk=9.96kN/m Load Qs2 (Snow load)
Sk=4.98kN/m
Sk=9.96kN/m
Load Qs3 (Snow load)
Sk=4.98kN/m
q(z)=Ce(z)·(½
ρ)·Vb²=Ce(z)·0.625·Vb²=0.900 kN/m²
7.00m
Zone : F, A= 5.09m², Cpe,10=-0.89, Cpe,1=-1.98 GHJI
Zone : F, A= 5.09m², Cpe,10=+0.22, Cpe,1=+0.22
Zone : G, A= 129.32m², Cpe,10=-0.79, Cpe,1=-1.50
Zone : G, A= 129.32m², Cpe,10=+0.22, Cpe,1=+0.22
18.00m
F
Zone : H, A= 757.23m², Cpe,10=+0.21, Cpe,1=+0.21
18.00m
Zone : I, A= 757.23m², Cpe,10=-0.40, Cpe,1=-0.40
Zone : I, A= 757.23m², Cpe,10=+0.00, Cpe,1=+0.00
Zone : J, A= 139.49m², Cpe,10=-0.98, Cpe,1=-1.47
Zone : J, A= 139.49m², Cpe,10=+0.00, Cpe,1=+0.00
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 4
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 5
h/d=4.50/18.00=0.250, e=9.00m
Zone : A, ( 1.80xh), Cpe,10=-1.20, Cpe,1=-1.40
96.00m
Zone : B, ( 7.20xh), Cpe,10=-0.80, Cpe,1=-1.10 DE
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 5
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 6
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 6
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 7
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 7
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 8
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 8
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:51
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 9
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 9
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 10
6. Steel sections
16.5
Steel cross-section properties
27
Cross-section HE 340 A-S 275 HE340A 9.5
y
330
Dimensions of cross section
Depth of cross section h= 330.00 mm
Width of cross section b= 300.00 mm
Web depth hw= 313.50 mm
Depth of straight portion of web dw= 243.00 mm
Web thickness tw= 9.50 mm z
Flange thickness tf= 16.50 mm
Radius of root fillet r= 27.00 mm
Mass = 105.00 Kg/m
12.7
Cross-section IPE 360-S 275 18
Dimensions of cross section 8
Depth of cross section h= 360.00 mm
IPE360
y
360
Width of cross section b= 170.00 mm
Web depth hw= 347.30 mm
Depth of straight portion of web dw= 298.60 mm
Web thickness tw= 8.00 mm
Flange thickness tf= 12.70 mm
Radius of root fillet r= 18.00 mm
Mass = 57.10 Kg/m z
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 10
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 11
12.7
Welded section
18
Cross-section haunch-end-S 275
8
Dimensions of cross section
haunch-end
y
720
Depth of cross section h= 720.00 mm
Width of cross section b= 170.00 mm
Web depth hw= 707.30 mm
Depth of straight portion of web dw= 643.69 mm
Web thickness tw= 8.00 mm
Flange thickness tf= 12.70 mm
Radius of root fillet r= 18.00 mm z
Mass = 77.57 Kg/m
12.7
Welded section
18
Cross-section haunch-middle-S 275
8
Dimensions of cross section
haunch-middle
y
540
Depth of cross section h= 540.00 mm
Width of cross section b= 170.00 mm
Web depth hw= 527.30 mm
Depth of straight portion of web dw= 463.69 mm
Web thickness tw= 8.00 mm
Flange thickness tf= 12.70 mm
Radius of root fillet r= 18.00 mm z
Mass = 66.26 Kg/m
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 11
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 12
The 2-dimensional finite element program FRAME2Dexpres© RUNET is used for the analysis.
The column bases are assumed to be pinned.
The connection of rafter to column are assumed to be fully rigid.
The increased stiffness of the haunches is taken into account.
The global or local imperfections are taken into account by equivalent loads.
Nodal points
Node x [mm] y[mm]
1 0 0
2 0 4500
3 9000 7000
4 18000 4500
5 18000 0
Supports
Node kind ux[mm] uy[mm] ur[rad]
1 pin ux=uy=0
5 pin ux=uy=0
Elements
Element node 1 node 2 length(mm) angle(°) E(GPa) A(mm2 ) I(mm 4 )
1 1 2 4500 90.00 210 13350 276900x10 3
2 2 3 9341 15.52 210 7273 162700x10 3
3 3 4 9341 344.48 210 7273 162700x10 3
4 4 5 4500 270.00 210 13350 276900x10 3
Finite element
3 model (FEM) Linear elastic analysis
2 3
2 4
1 4
1 5
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 12
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 13
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 13
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 14
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 14
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 15
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 15
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 16
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 16
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 17
201 ULS-STR -33.4 -33.4 51.9 40.2 -9.0 9.0 -40.2 -51.9 33.4 33.4
202 ULS-STR -89.6 -89.6 139.0 107.6 -24.0 24.0 -107.6 -139.0 89.6 89.6
203 ULS-STR -71.1 -71.1 127.1 95.7 -35.8 2.2 -75.0 -93.5 71.1 71.1
204 ULS-STR -71.1 -71.1 93.5 75.0 -2.2 35.8 -95.7 -127.1 71.1 71.1
205 ULS-STR 20.9 -4.6 -0.5 -1.6 -6.5 -7.2 -5.8 -5.4 6.7 17.6
206 ULS-STR 5.3 -20.2 28.2 19.7 -15.9 -2.8 -25.7 -31.2 24.4 35.4
210 ULS-STR 25.0 -0.5 -6.8 -6.5 -5.4 -8.3 -0.9 0.9 2.6 13.6
211 ULS-STR -67.6 -83.0 124.1 95.3 -25.4 17.1 -99.8 -127.7 84.2 90.8
212 ULS-STR -77.0 -92.3 141.4 108.1 -31.0 19.8 -111.7 -143.1 94.9 101.4
213 ULS-STR -49.2 -64.5 112.3 83.5 -37.2 -4.6 -67.2 -82.2 65.7 72.3
214 ULS-STR -58.5 -73.9 129.5 96.3 -42.8 -2.0 -79.2 -97.6 76.4 82.9
215 ULS-STR -49.2 -64.5 78.6 62.8 -3.6 29.0 -87.9 -115.8 65.7 72.3
216 ULS-STR -58.5 -73.9 95.9 75.6 -9.2 31.7 -99.9 -131.3 76.4 82.9
217 ULS-STR -16.0 -41.6 56.9 42.8 -16.4 2.7 -50.1 -62.8 43.7 54.6
218 ULS-STR -6.8 -32.3 50.9 36.8 -22.3 -8.2 -33.9 -40.0 34.4 45.3
219 ULS-STR -6.8 -32.3 34.1 26.5 -5.5 8.6 -44.2 -56.8 34.4 45.3
220 ULS-STR -31.7 -57.2 85.6 64.1 -25.7 7.1 -70.1 -88.6 61.4 72.3
221 ULS-STR -22.4 -48.0 79.7 58.2 -31.7 -3.8 -53.9 -65.8 52.2 63.1
222 ULS-STR -22.4 -48.0 62.9 47.9 -14.9 13.1 -64.2 -82.6 52.2 63.1
231 ULS-STR -30.7 -46.0 66.8 50.9 -15.5 7.2 -55.4 -70.3 47.2 53.8
232 ULS-STR -40.1 -55.4 84.0 63.8 -21.1 9.9 -67.3 -85.8 57.9 64.4
233 ULS-STR -21.4 -36.7 60.8 45.0 -21.4 -3.6 -39.1 -47.5 38.0 44.6
234 ULS-STR -30.8 -46.1 78.1 57.8 -27.0 -1.0 -51.1 -63.0 48.6 55.2
235 ULS-STR -21.4 -36.7 44.0 34.7 -4.6 13.2 -49.4 -64.4 38.0 44.6
236 ULS-STR -30.8 -46.1 61.3 47.5 -10.2 15.8 -61.4 -79.8 48.6 55.2
251 ULS-STR -65.3 -80.6 120.5 92.5 -24.7 16.5 -97.0 -124.1 81.9 88.5
252 ULS-STR -74.7 -90.0 137.8 105.4 -30.4 19.2 -109.0 -139.5 92.5 99.1
253 ULS-STR -46.8 -62.2 108.7 80.7 -36.6 -5.3 -64.4 -78.6 63.4 70.0
254 ULS-STR -56.2 -71.5 125.9 93.5 -42.2 -2.6 -76.4 -94.1 74.1 80.6
255 ULS-STR -46.8 -62.2 75.0 60.0 -3.0 28.4 -85.1 -112.2 63.4 70.0
256 ULS-STR -56.2 -71.5 92.3 72.8 -8.6 31.0 -97.1 -127.7 74.1 80.6
257 ULS-STR -13.7 -39.2 53.3 40.0 -15.7 2.0 -47.4 -59.2 41.3 52.3
258 ULS-STR -4.5 -30.0 47.4 34.1 -21.7 -8.8 -31.1 -36.4 32.1 43.0
259 ULS-STR -4.5 -30.0 30.5 23.7 -4.9 8.0 -41.4 -53.2 32.1 43.0
260 ULS-STR -29.4 -54.9 82.0 61.4 -25.1 6.5 -67.3 -85.0 59.1 70.0
261 ULS-STR -20.1 -45.6 76.1 55.4 -31.1 -4.4 -51.1 -62.2 49.8 60.8
262 ULS-STR -20.1 -45.6 59.3 45.1 -14.2 12.4 -61.4 -79.0 49.8 60.8
301 SLS -23.5 -23.5 36.4 28.2 -6.3 6.3 -28.2 -36.4 23.5 23.5
302 SLS -60.9 -60.9 94.4 73.1 -16.3 16.3 -73.1 -94.4 60.9 60.9
303 SLS -48.6 -48.6 86.5 65.2 -24.2 1.8 -51.4 -64.1 48.6 48.6
304 SLS -48.6 -48.6 64.1 51.4 -1.8 24.2 -65.2 -86.5 48.6 48.6
305 SLS 12.8 -4.2 1.5 0.3 -4.6 -4.5 -3.5 -5.4 5.6 12.9
306 SLS 2.4 -14.6 20.6 14.6 -10.9 -1.5 -18.5 -22.6 17.4 24.7
311 SLS -46.3 -56.5 84.5 64.9 -17.2 11.7 -67.9 -86.9 57.3 61.7
312 SLS -52.5 -62.7 96.0 73.5 -21.0 13.5 -75.9 -97.2 64.4 68.8
313 SLS -33.9 -44.1 76.6 57.0 -25.1 -2.8 -46.2 -56.6 45.0 49.4
314 SLS -40.2 -50.4 88.1 65.6 -28.9 -1.0 -54.2 -66.9 52.1 56.4
315 SLS -33.9 -44.1 54.2 43.3 -2.7 19.6 -60.0 -79.0 45.0 49.4
316 SLS -40.2 -50.4 65.7 51.8 -6.5 21.4 -68.0 -89.3 52.1 56.4
317 SLS -11.9 -28.9 39.7 29.9 -11.2 2.1 -34.8 -43.6 30.3 37.6
318 SLS -5.7 -22.7 35.8 25.9 -15.2 -5.2 -24.0 -28.5 24.1 31.4
319 SLS -5.7 -22.7 24.6 19.1 -4.0 6.0 -30.9 -39.7 24.1 31.4
320 SLS -22.3 -39.3 58.9 44.2 -17.5 5.1 -48.1 -60.8 42.1 49.4
321 SLS -16.1 -33.1 54.9 40.2 -21.4 -2.2 -37.3 -45.7 35.9 43.2
322 SLS -16.1 -33.1 43.7 33.3 -10.2 9.0 -44.2 -56.9 35.9 43.2
331 SLS -21.4 -21.4 33.3 25.7 -5.7 5.7 -25.7 -33.3 21.4 21.4
332 SLS -21.4 -21.4 33.3 25.7 -5.7 5.7 -25.7 -33.3 21.4 21.4
333 SLS -19.0 -19.0 31.7 24.2 -7.3 2.8 -21.4 -27.2 19.0 19.0
334 SLS -19.0 -19.0 31.7 24.2 -7.3 2.8 -21.4 -27.2 19.0 19.0
335 SLS -19.0 -19.0 27.2 21.4 -2.8 7.3 -24.2 -31.7 19.0 19.0
336 SLS -19.0 -19.0 27.2 21.4 -2.8 7.3 -24.2 -31.7 19.0 19.0
337 SLS -6.7 -10.1 14.7 11.2 -3.4 1.6 -12.2 -15.4 10.4 11.8
338 SLS -6.7 -10.1 14.7 11.2 -3.4 1.6 -12.2 -15.4 10.4 11.8
339 SLS -6.7 -10.1 14.7 11.2 -3.4 1.6 -12.2 -15.4 10.4 11.8
340 SLS -8.8 -12.2 18.5 14.0 -4.7 2.2 -14.8 -18.9 12.8 14.2
341 SLS -8.8 -12.2 18.5 14.0 -4.7 2.2 -14.8 -18.9 12.8 14.2
342 SLS -8.8 -12.2 18.5 14.0 -4.7 2.2 -14.8 -18.9 12.8 14.2
351 SLS -11.6 -11.6 18.0 13.9 -3.1 3.1 -13.9 -18.0 11.6 11.6
352 SLS -11.6 -11.6 18.0 13.9 -3.1 3.1 -13.9 -18.0 11.6 11.6
353 SLS -11.6 -11.6 18.0 13.9 -3.1 3.1 -13.9 -18.0 11.6 11.6
354 SLS -11.6 -11.6 18.0 13.9 -3.1 3.1 -13.9 -18.0 11.6 11.6
355 SLS -11.6 -11.6 18.0 13.9 -3.1 3.1 -13.9 -18.0 11.6 11.6
356 SLS -11.6 -11.6 18.0 13.9 -3.1 3.1 -13.9 -18.0 11.6 11.6
A:left end, C:haunch end, B: right end
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 17
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 18
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 18
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 19
301 SLS -105.5 -47.5 39.4 35.1 35.1 39.4 -47.5 -105.5
302 SLS -274.0 -123.2 102.2 91.0 91.0 102.2 -123.2 -274.0
303 SLS -218.5 -82.0 97.3 72.6 72.6 72.8 -114.5 -218.5
304 SLS -218.5 -114.5 72.8 72.6 72.6 97.3 -82.0 -218.5
305 SLS 19.3 20.9 21.0 4.6 4.6 -18.5 -32.7 -41.7
306 SLS -27.6 4.0 35.4 17.9 17.9 -38.5 -57.8 -94.9
311 SLS -231.1 -96.6 97.0 83.4 83.4 89.9 -128.4 -267.7
312 SLS -259.3 -106.7 108.9 91.3 91.3 99.0 -143.8 -299.6
313 SLS -175.7 -55.4 93.9 64.9 64.9 -73.6 -119.7 -212.2
314 SLS -203.8 -65.5 106.2 72.9 72.9 -85.6 -135.2 -244.2
315 SLS -175.7 -87.9 65.5 64.9 64.9 83.2 -87.2 -212.2
316 SLS -203.8 -98.1 75.6 72.9 72.9 92.3 -102.6 -244.2
317 SLS -91.6 -29.0 53.0 41.4 41.4 41.9 -82.0 -152.6
318 SLS -63.9 -8.4 53.4 32.2 32.2 -46.3 -77.7 -124.9
319 SLS -63.9 -24.6 34.8 32.2 32.2 36.0 -61.4 -124.9
320 SLS -138.6 -45.8 73.4 54.7 54.7 56.5 -107.7 -205.8
321 SLS -110.8 -25.2 73.6 45.5 45.5 -66.3 -103.4 -178.1
322 SLS -110.8 -41.5 54.6 45.5 45.5 51.3 -87.1 -178.1
331 SLS -96.5 -43.4 36.0 32.0 32.0 36.0 -43.4 -96.5
332 SLS -96.5 -43.4 36.0 32.0 32.0 36.0 -43.4 -96.5
333 SLS -85.4 -35.1 34.8 28.4 28.4 29.6 -41.7 -85.4
334 SLS -85.4 -35.1 34.8 28.4 28.4 29.6 -41.7 -85.4
335 SLS -85.4 -41.7 29.6 28.4 28.4 34.8 -35.1 -85.4
336 SLS -85.4 -41.7 29.6 28.4 28.4 34.8 -35.1 -85.4
337 SLS -37.8 -14.6 17.8 14.8 14.8 15.4 -25.2 -50.0
338 SLS -37.8 -14.6 17.8 14.8 14.8 15.4 -25.2 -50.0
339 SLS -37.8 -14.6 17.8 14.8 14.8 15.4 -25.2 -50.0
340 SLS -47.2 -17.9 21.8 17.4 17.4 18.5 -30.3 -60.7
341 SLS -47.2 -17.9 21.8 17.4 17.4 18.5 -30.3 -60.7
342 SLS -47.2 -17.9 21.8 17.4 17.4 18.5 -30.3 -60.7
351 SLS -52.1 -23.4 19.4 17.3 17.3 19.4 -23.4 -52.1
352 SLS -52.1 -23.4 19.4 17.3 17.3 19.4 -23.4 -52.1
353 SLS -52.1 -23.4 19.4 17.3 17.3 19.4 -23.4 -52.1
354 SLS -52.1 -23.4 19.4 17.3 17.3 19.4 -23.4 -52.1
355 SLS -52.1 -23.4 19.4 17.3 17.3 19.4 -23.4 -52.1
356 SLS -52.1 -23.4 19.4 17.3 17.3 19.4 -23.4 -52.1
A:left end, C:haunch end, M: span, B: right end
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 19
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 20
-131.6 kN
-131.6 kN
-139.0 kN
-109.1 kN
-93.5 kN -99.8 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 20
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 21
-0.5 kN -4.6 kN
-5.4 kN -8.4 kN
-6.8 kN 1.3 kN
0.9 kN -2.5 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 21
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 22
-120.6 kN
-122.9 kN
-127.7 kN
-135.1 kN
-138.2 kN
-143.1 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 22
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 23
59.6 kNm
-221.1 kNm
δx=6.9 mm δx=34.0 mm -129.6kNm
-129.6 kNm -221.1 kNm
δy=49.9 mm
56.9 kN
-58.9 kN
-62.8 kN -62.7 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 23
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 6.000
m
Pg. 24
9. Design of Purlins
Z25030
Purlin laterally restrained, Z25030 S 275
Continuous purlin, L= 6.000 m, s= 1.000 m
°
.52Â
α=15
m
1.000
m
1.000
Roof loads
Roof slope α = 15.52°
Load of roof covering gk1 = 0.200 kN/m² (EN1991-1-1 §5)
Imposed load (category H) qk = 0.400 kN/m² (EN1991-1-1 §6.3.4.2)
Snow load qsk = 1.600 kN/m² (EN1991-1-3 §5.3)
Wind pressure wk = 0.000 kN/m² (EN1991-1-4 §7.2)
Wind uplift wk =-0.360 kN/m²
Load on purlin
Purlin spacing s= 1.000 m
Load of roof covering Gk1= 1.000x0.200= 0.20kN/m
Purlin weight Gk2= 0.10 kN/m
Permanent load Gk =Gk1+Gk2=0.20+0.10=0.30 kN/m
Imposed load (category H) Qkk= 1.000x0.400= 0.40kN/m
Snow load Qsk= 1.000x1.600= 1.60kN/m
Wind uplift Qwk=-1.000x0.360=-0.36kN/m
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 24
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 25
250
Depth of straight portion of web dw= 234.00 mm
Web thickness tw= 3.00 mm
Flange thickness tf= 3.00 mm
Radius of root fillet r= 5.00 mm
Mass = 9.84 Kg/m
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 25
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 26
Flange
c=***=73.0 mm, t=3.0 mm, c/t=73.0/3.0=24.33
S 275 , t= 3.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
c/t=24.33>14ε=14x0.92=12.88
The flange is class 4 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2) c
Flange
-
λ p=(b/t)/[28.40ε Ö (Kσ)] (EN1993-1-5, §4.4.2, Eq.4.2, Tabl.4.1)
-
b=c=73.0mm, t=3.0mm, ε=0.92, ψ=1.00, Kσ=0.43, λ p=1.420
-
λ p=1.420>0.673 ρ=[1-0.188/1.420]/1.420=0.611 (ρ<1.0), ceff=ρ·c=0.611x73=44.6 mm
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for bending moment y-y (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.5)
My.ed= 10.22 kNm
Bending Resistance γ Μ0=[10 -6 ]x91.365x10 3 x275/1.00= 25.13kNm
Mcy,rd=Weffy·fy/
My,ed= 10.22 kNm < 25.13 kNm =My,rd=Mply,rd, Is verified
My,ed/My,rd= 10.22/25.13= 0.407<1
hw/tw=(250.0-2x3.0)/3.0=247.0/3.0=82.33>72x0.92/1.00=72ε/η=66.24 (η=1.00)
S 275 , t= 3.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92
Shear buckling resistance must be verified (EC3 §6.2.6.6)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 26
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 27
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for axial force, shear and bending (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.9)
N.ed= 0.00kN, Vz.ed= 9.81kN, My.ed= 10.22kNm
Mc,y,rd=25.13kNm, Vpl,z,rd=94.31kN
Ned=0 kN, Effect of axial force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.9.1 Eq.6.33, Eq.6.34, Eq.6.35)
Ved=9.81kN <= 0.50x94.31=0.50xVpl,rd=47.15kN
Effect of shear force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.8.2)
Elastic critical moment for lateral-torsional buckling (EC3 §6.3.2.2.2, EN1993:2002 AnnexC)
Timoshenko,S.P, Gere,J.M, Theory of elastic stability, McGraw-Hill, 1961
Mcr=C1·[
π²EIz/(kL)²]{
Ö [(kz/kw)²(Iw/Iz)+(kL)²GIt,eq/(
π²EIz)+(C2·zg-C3·zj)²] -(C2·zg-C3·zj)}
Method of computation C1,C2,C3 : ECCS 119/Galea SN030a-EN-EU Access Steel 2006
μ=Mo/M=qL²/8M=-1.19, ψ=Mb/Ma=0.00, C1=1.629, C2=0.805
G=E/(2(1+ν))=210000/(2(1+0.30))=80769=8.1x10 4 N/mm², It,eq=It+Cd·(kL)²/(
π²G)
Hogging
k·L=6000mm, zg=-125mm, zj=0mm (EN1993:2002 Eq.C.11)
ky=1.0, kz=1.0, kw=1.0, C1=1.629, C2=0.805, C3=0.000
Mcr=[10 -6 ]1.629x[π²x2.1x105 x0.195x10 6 /6000²]
x{ [(1.0/1.0)²x(2.967x109 /0.195x10 6 )
+6000²x8.1x104 x0.275x10 6 /(π²x2.1x105 x0.195x10 6 )
+(-0.805x125)²]0.5 -(-0.805x125) }= 27.7 kNm
It,eq=(0.004x10 6 +10 3 x6.0x6000²/(π²8.1x104 ))= 0.275x10 6 mm 4
-
λ ,lt= Ö (Wpl,y·fy/Mcr)=Ö {[10 -6 ]x91.365x10 3 x275/27.7}=0.952 (EC3 Eq.6.56)
h/b=250/73=3.42>2.00 buckling curve: c
imperfection factor: α,lt=0.49, β=0.75, χ,lt=0.668 (T.6.3, T.6.5, Fig.6.4)
- - -
Φ,lt=0.5[1+α,lt( λ ,lt- λ ,lto)+β λ ,lt²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(0.952-0.40)+0.75x0.952²]=0.975
-
χ,lt=1/[Φ,lt+ Ö (Φ,lt²-β λ ,lt²)]=1/[0.975+Ö (0.975²-0.75x0.975²)]=0.668
- -
Reduction factor χ,lt=1/[Φ,lt+ Ö (Φ,lt²- β λ ,lt²)], χ,lt<=1.0, 1/ λ ,lt², χ,lt=0.668 (Eq.6.57)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 27
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 28
αcr=(Hnhf/Ved)(h/δh,ed) (Eq.5.2)
From elastic analysis we obtain, L.C. 212: 1.35Gk+1.50Qs1+0.60x1.50Qw2= 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Vertical reaction at the base of column Ved= 181.2 kN
Horizontal reaction at the base of column Hed= 101.4 kN
Axial force at rafters Nred= 138.2 kN
Notional horizontal force applied at the top of the columns Hnhf= 1.0 kN
Horizontal deflection at column top for notional force δh,ed= 1.88 mm
αcr=(1.0/181.2)(4500/1.88)=13.23 (Eq.5.2)
φ=φο·
αh· δ=(1/200)x0.943x0.866x1.124=4.588x10 -3 =1/218
αm· (Eq.5.5)
φο=1/200, αh=2/ Ö h=2/ Ö 4.500=0.943 2/3<=αh<=1.0, αm= Ö (0.5(1+1/2))=0.866
Sway imperfection may be disregarded where Hed>0.15Ved (§5.3.2(4) Eq.5.7)
Effect of initial sway imperfection Heq=4.588x10 -3 xVed (§5.3.2 (5))
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 28
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 29
Reactions at the supports, Horizontal Force Hed [kN], Vertical Force Ved [kN]
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 29
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 30
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 30
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 31
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 31
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 32
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 32
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 33
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Ned = 181.4 kN
Ved = 101.7 kN
Myed = 443.1 kNm, Mzed =0.0 kNm
Myed = 391.5 kNm (Column top under the haunch)
Buckling length,In-plane buckling Lcr,y =17366mm (Unbraced members) (EC3 §5.5.2.(7))
Buckling length,Out-of-plane buckling Lcr,z =3960mm (Column height without haunch)
Buckling length,Torsional buckling Lcr,t =3960mm
Buckling length,Lateral torsional buckling Lcr,lt=3960mm
Web
c=330.0-2x16.5-2x27.0=243.0 mm, t=9.5 mm, c/t=243.0/9.5=25.58 fy
S 275 , t= 9.5<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
αc
Position of neutral axis for combined Bending and compression
c
Ned/(2tw·fy/
γM0)=181400/(2x9.5x275/1.00)=34.7 mm
α=(243.0/2+34.7)/243.0=0.643>0.5
fy
c/t=25.58<=396x0.92/(13x0.643-1)=49.52
The web is class 1 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2)
Flange
c=300.0/2-9.5/2-27.0=118.3 mm, t=16.5 mm, c/t=118.3/16.5=7.17
S 275 , t=16.5<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
c/t=7.17<=9ε=9x0.92=8.28
The flange is class 1 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2) c
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for bending moment y-y (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.5)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
My.ed=443.10 kNm
Bending Resistance γ Μ0=[10 -6 ]x1850.0x10 3 x275/1.00= 508.75kNm
Mply,rd=Wply·fy/
My,ed= 443.10 kNm < 508.75 kNm =My,rd=Mply,rd, Is verified
My,ed/My,rd= 443.10/508.75= 0.871<1
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 33
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 34
hw/tw=(330.0-2x16.5)/9.5=313.5/9.5=33.00<=72x0.92/1.00=72ε/η=66.24 (η=1.00)
S 275 , t= 9.5<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92
Shear buckling resistance is not necessary to be verified (EC3 §6.2.6.6)
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for axial force, shear and bending (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.9)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
N.ed= 181.40kN (Compression), Vz.ed= 101.70kN, My.ed= 443.10kNm
Nplrd=3671.25kN, Mpl,y,rd=508.75kNm, Vpl,z,rd=714.11kN
Ned=181.40kN <= 0.25x3671.25=0.25xNplrd=917.81kN
Ned=181.40kN <= [10 -3 ]x0.5x313.5x9.5x275/1.00=0.5hw·tw·fy/
γM0=409.51 kN
n=Ned/Nplrd=181/3671= 0.049
Effect of axial force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.9.1 Eq.6.33, Eq.6.34, Eq.6.35)
Ved=101.70kN <= 0.50x714.11=0.50xVpl,rd=357.05kN
Effect of shear force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.8.2)
h/b=330/300=1.10<1.20, tf=16.5mm<=100 mm
y-y buckling curve:b, imperfection factor: αy=0.34, χy=0.383 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φy=0.5[1+αy( λ y-0.2)+ λ y²]=0.5x[1+0.34x(1.396-0.2)+1.396²]=1.678
-
χy=1/[Φy+ Ö (Φy²-λ y²)]=1/[1.678+Ö (1.678²-1.396²)]=0.383 <=1χy=0.383
z-z buckling curve:c, imperfection factor: αz=0.49, χz=0.777
- -
Φz=0.5[1+αz( λ z-0.2)+ λ z²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(0.614-0.2)+0.614²]=0.790
-
χz=1/[Φz+ Ö (Φz²-λ z²)]=1/[0.790+Ö (0.790²-0.614²)]=0.777 <=1χz=0.777
- - -
Reduction factor χ=1/[Φ+ Ö (Φ²-λ ²)], χ<=1.0, Φ=0.5[1+α( λ -0.2)+ λ ²], χ=0.383 (EC3 Eq.6.49)
-3
Nb,rd=χ·A·fy/
γΜ1= 0.383x[10 ]x13350x275/1.00=1406.09kN (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 181.40 kN < 1406.09 kN =Nb,rd, Is verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 181.40/1406.09= 0.129<1
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 34
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 35
-
λ ,lt= Ö (Wpl,y·fy/Mcr)=Ö {[10 -6 ]x1850.0x10 3 x275/3253.8}=0.395 (EC3 Eq.6.56)
-
λ ,lt<= 0.40, χ,lt=1.00 (EC3 §6.3.2.2.4)
-
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f, χ,lt,mod<=1, χ,lt,mod<=1/ λ ,lt²=1/0.395²=6.40 (EC3 §6.3.2.3(2),Eq.6.58)
Kc=1/(1.33-0.33ψ)=0.752, ψ=0.00 (EC3 Tab.6.6)
-
f=1-0.5(1-kc)[1-2.0( λ ,lt-0.8)²]=1-0.5x(1-0.752)[1-2.0x(0.395-0.8)²]=0.917, f<=1.0
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f=1.000/0.917=1.091, χ,lt,mod<=1.0, χ,lt,mod<=6.40, χ,lt,mod=1.000
12.6. Axial force and bending moment, Column (ULS) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.3)
Ned=181.40 kN, My,ed=391.46 kNm
Ned/(χy·Nrk/ γ Μ1)+kyy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/ γ Μ1)<=1 (EC3 Eq.6.61)
Ned/(χz·Nrk/ γ Μ1)+kzy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/ γ Μ1)<=1 (EC3 Eq.6.62)
Nrk=A·fy=[10-3 ]x13350x275=3671.2 kN (Tab.6.7)
My,rk=Wpl,y·fy=[10-6 ]x1850.0x10 3 x275=508.7 kNm
χy·Nrk/
γ Μ1=χy·A·fy/γΜ1= 0.383x[10 -3 ]x13350x275/1.00=1406.1kN
-3
χz·Nrk/
γ Μ1=χz·A·fy/γΜ1= 0.777x[10 ]x13350x275/1.00=2852.6kN
χLT·My,rk/ γΜ1= 1.000x[10 -6 ]x1850.0x10 3 x275/1.00=508.7kNm
γ Μ1=χLT·Wpl,y·fy/
kyy=Cmy·CmLT(
μy/(1-Ned/Ncr,y)(1/Cyy), μy=(1-Ned/Ncr,y)/(1-χy·Ned/Ncr,y) (EC3 Tab.A.1)
kzy=Cmy·CmLT(
μz/(1-Ned/Ncr,y)(1/Czy)0.60 Ö (wy/wz), μz=(1-Ned/Ncr,z)/(1-χz·Ned/Ncr,z)
-3
Ncr,y=π²
Ε Ιy/lcr,y²=3.14²x[10 ]x210000x276.90x10 6 /17366²= 1903 kN
Ε Ιz/lcr,z²=3.14²x[10]x210000x74.360x10 6 / 3960²= 9828 kN
Ncr,z=π² -3
wy=Wpl,y/Wel,y<=1.50, wy= 1.850x10 6 / 1.678x10 6 =1.103 <= 1.50 (EC3 Annex A.1)
wz=Wpl,z/Wel,z<=1.50, wz= 0.756x10 6 / 0.496x10 6 =1.524 > 1.50 , wz=1.50
npl=Ned/(Nrk/γΜ1)=181.40/(3671.20/1.00)=0.049
-
λ max=max(1.396,0.614)=1.400 (EC3 Annex A.1)
Mcr,o=(1.00/1.77)x3253.80=1838.3, C1=1.00
-
λ o= Ö ([10 -6 ]x1850.0x10 3 x275/1838.3)=0.530
-
λ o,lim=0.2 Ö C1 [(1-Ned/Ncr,z)(1-Ned/Ncr,t)] 0.25 (EC3 Annex A.1)
-
λ o,lim=0.2 Ö 1.770 [(1-181.4/9828)(1-181.4/4520)] 0.25 =0.262
εy=(My,ed/Ned)(A/Wel)=([10 3 ]x391.46/181.40)x(13350.0/1678.0x10 3 )=17.17
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 35
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 36
- -
Cyy=1+(wy-1)[(2-1.6Cmy²·λ max/wy-1.6Cmy²·λ max²/wy)npl-blt]>=Wel,y/Wpl,y (Annex A, T.A.1)
-
blt=0.5alt·λ o²[My,ed/(
χ,lt·Mpl,y,rd)](Mz,ed/Mpl,z,rd) =
=0.5x0.995x0.530²[391.5/(1.000x461.5)](0.0/136.4) = 0.000
Cyy=1+(1.103-1)[(2-1.6x1.004²x1.400/1.103-1.6x1.004²x1.400²/1.103)x0.049-0.000]=0.985
Cyy>=1678.0x10 3 /1850.0x10 3 =0.907, Cyy=0.985
-
Czy=1+(wy-1)[(2-14.0Cmy²· λ max²/wy5 )npl-dlt]>=0.6 Ö (wy/wz)(Wel,y/Wpl,y) (Annex A, T.A.1)
- -
dlt=2alt·[λ o/(0.1+ λ z 4 )][My,ed/(Cmy· χ,lt·Mpl,y,rd)][Mz,ed/(Cmz·Mpl,z,rd)]=
=20.995x[0.530/(0.1+0.614 4 )][391.5/(1.004x1.000x461.5)][0.0/(0.000x136.4)]=0.000
5
Czy=1+(1.103-1)[(2-14.0x1.004²x1.400²/1.103 )0.049-0.000]=0.925
Czy>=0.6 Ö (1.103/1.500)(1678.0x10 /1850.0x10 3 )=0.467, Czy=0.925
3
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Ned/(χy·Nrk/
γ Μ1)+kyy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/
γ Μ1)= (EC3 Eq.6.61)
181.4/(0.383x3671.2/1.00)+1.093x391.5/(1.000x508.7/1.00)=0.129+0.841=0.970
0.970< 1.000, Is verified
Ned/(χz·Nrk/
γ Μ1)+kzy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/
γ Μ1)= (EC3 Eq.6.62)
181.4/(0.777x3671.2/1.00)+0.635x391.5/(1.000x508.7/1.00)=0.064+0.489=0.552
0.552< 1.000, Is verified
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 36
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 37
L .C . 2 1 2 B e n d . m o m e n ts k N m - 4 4 3 .1 k N m
-3 7 8 .8 k N m 1 3 4 .0
1 6 0 .3 1 14 43 5. 7. 1 - 2 1 3 .5
-1 5 4 .8
1 8 0 0 6 0 0 0
R a fte r e n d - s p a n r e g
R i ao fnt e r m id - s p a n r e g io n
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Ned = 115.9 kN
Ved = 111.9 kN
Myed = 213.5 kNm, Mzed =0.0 kNm
Myed = 160.5 kNm (at mid-span)
Myed = -213.5 kNm (at haunch-start)
Myed = -419.5 kNm (at haunch end)
Myed = -443.1 kNm (at column axis point)
Web
c=360.0-2x12.7-2x18.0=298.6 mm, t=8.0 mm, c/t=298.6/8.0=37.33 fy
S 275 , t= 8.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
αc
Position of neutral axis for combined Bending and compression
c
Ned/(2tw·fy/
γM0)=115900/(2x8.0x275/1.00)=26.3 mm
α=(298.6/2+26.3)/298.6=0.588>0.5
fy
c/t=37.33<=396x0.92/(13x0.588-1)=54.81
The web is class 1 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2)
Flange
c=170.0/2-8.0/2-18.0=63.0 mm, t=12.7 mm, c/t=63.0/12.7=4.96
S 275 , t=12.7<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
c/t=4.96<=9ε=9x0.92=8.28
The flange is class 1 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2) c
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 37
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 38
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for bending moment y-y (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.5)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
My.ed=213.50 kNm
Bending Resistance γ Μ0=[10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/1.00= 280.22kNm
Mply,rd=Wply·fy/
My,ed= 213.50 kNm < 280.22 kNm =My,rd=Mply,rd, Is verified
My,ed/My,rd= 213.50/280.22= 0.762<1
hw/tw=(360.0-2x12.7)/8.0=347.3/8.0=43.41<=72x0.92/1.00=72ε/η=66.24 (η=1.00)
S 275 , t= 8.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92
Shear buckling resistance is not necessary to be verified (EC3 §6.2.6.6)
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for axial force, shear and bending (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.9)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
N.ed= 115.90kN (Compression), Vz.ed= 111.90kN, My.ed= 213.50kNm
Nplrd=2000.08kN, Mpl,y,rd=280.22kNm, Vpl,z,rd=557.89kN
Ned=115.90kN <= 0.25x2000.08=0.25xNplrd=500.02kN
Ned=115.90kN <= [10 -3 ]x0.5x347.3x8.0x275/1.00=0.5hw·tw·fy/
γM0=382.03 kN
n=Ned/Nplrd=116/2000= 0.058
Effect of axial force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.9.1 Eq.6.33, Eq.6.34, Eq.6.35)
Ved=111.90kN <= 0.50x557.89=0.50xVpl,rd=278.95kN
Effect of shear force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.8.2)
13.4. Flexural Buckling, Rafter mid-span region (Ultimate Limit State) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.1)
Nc,ed=115.95 kN, Lcr,y=17.907 m, Lcr,z=1.000 m
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Buckling lengths: Lcr,y=1.971x9086=17907mm, Lcr,z=0.110x9086=1000mm
Non-dimensional slenderness (Cross-section Class: 1 ) (EC3 §6.3.1.3)
-
λ y= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,y)=(Lcr,y/iy)·(1/
λ1)=(17907/149.6)x(1/86.39)=1.386
-
λ z= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,z)=(Lcr,z/iz)·(1/
λ1)=(1000/ 37.9)x(1/86.39)=0.306
λ1=π Ö (E/fy)=93.9ε=86.39, ε= Ö (235/fy)=0.92
h/b=360/170=2.12>=1.20, tf=12.7mm<=40 mm
y-y buckling curve:a, imperfection factor: αy=0.21, χy=0.425 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φy=0.5[1+αy( λ y-0.2)+ λ y²]=0.5x[1+0.21x(1.386-0.2)+1.386²]=1.585
-
χy=1/[Φy+ Ö (Φy²-λ y²)]=1/[1.585+Ö (1.585²-1.386²)]=0.425 <=1χy=0.425
z-z buckling curve:b, imperfection factor: αz=0.34, χz=0.962
- -
Φz=0.5[1+αz( λ z-0.2)+ λ z²]=0.5x[1+0.34x(0.306-0.2)+0.306²]=0.565
-
χz=1/[Φz+ Ö (Φz²-λ z²)]=1/[0.565+Ö (0.565²-0.306²)]=0.962 <=1χz=0.962
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 38
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 39
- - -
Reduction factor χ=1/[Φ+ Ö (Φ²-λ ²)], χ<=1.0, Φ=0.5[1+α( λ -0.2)+ λ ²], χ=0.425 (EC3 Eq.6.49)
γΜ1= 0.425x[10 -3 ]x7273x275/1.00=850.03kN
Nb,rd=χ·A·fy/ (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 115.95 kN < 850.03 kN =Nb,rd, Is verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 115.95/850.03= 0.136<1
13.5. Lateral torsional buckling, Rafter mid-span region (ULS) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.2)
My,ed=145.15 kN, L=9.086m, Lcr,y=17.907m, Lcr,z=1.000m, Lcr,lt=1.000m
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Elastic critical moment for lateral-torsional buckling (EC3 §6.3.2.2.2, EN1993:2002 AnnexC)
Timoshenko,S.P, Gere,J.M, Theory of elastic stability, McGraw-Hill, 1961
Mcr=C1·[ π²EIz/(kL)²]{
Ö [(kz/kw)²(Iw/Iz)+(kL)²GIt/( π²EIz)+(C2·zg-C3·zj)²] -(C2·zg-C3·zj)}
Method of computation C1,C2,C3 : ECCS 119/Galea SN030a-EN-EU Access Steel 2006
μ=Mo/M=qL²/8M=2.3/134.0=0.02, ψ=Mb/Ma=-91.8/134.0=-0.68, C1=2.205, C2=0.069
4
G=E/(2(1+ν))=210000/(2(1+0.30))=80769=8.1x10 N/mm²
k·L=1000mm, zg=h/2=360/2=180mm, zj=0mm (EN1993:2002 Eq.C.11)
ky=1.0, kz=1.0, kw=1.0, C1=2.205, C2=0.069, C3=0.000
Mcr=[10 -6 ]2.205x[π²x2.1x105 x10.430x10 6 /1000²]
x{ [(1.0/1.0)²x(313.58x109 /10.430x10 6 )
+1000²x8.1x104 x0.373x10 6 /(π²x2.1x105 x10.430x10 6 )
+(0.069x180)²]0.5 -(0.069x180) }= 7880.9 kNm
-
λ ,lt= Ö (Wpl,y·fy/Mcr)=Ö {[10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/7880.9}=0.189 (EC3 Eq.6.56)
-
λ ,lt<= 0.40, χ,lt=1.00 (EC3 §6.3.2.2.4)
-
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f, χ,lt,mod<=1, χ,lt,mod<=1/ λ ,lt²=1/0.189²=28.12 (EC3 §6.3.2.3(2),Eq.6.58)
Kc=1.00 (EC3 Tab.6.6)
-
f=1-0.5(1-kc)[1-2.0( λ ,lt-0.8)²]=1-0.5x(1-1.000)[1-2.0x(0.189-0.8)²]=1.000, f<=1.0
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f=1.000/1.000=1.000, χ,lt,mod<=1.0, χ,lt,mod<=28.12, χ,lt,mod=1.000
13.6. Axial force and bending moment, Rafter mid-span region (ULS) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.3)
Ned=115.95 kN, My,ed=145.15 kNm
Ned/(χy·Nrk/ γ Μ1)+kyy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/ γ Μ1)<=1 (EC3 Eq.6.61)
Ned/(χz·Nrk/ γ Μ1)+kzy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/ γ Μ1)<=1 (EC3 Eq.6.62)
Nrk=A·fy=[10-3 ]x7273x275=2000.1 kN (Tab.6.7)
My,rk=Wpl,y·fy=[10-6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275=280.2 kNm
χy·Nrk/
γ Μ1=χy·A·fy/γΜ1= 0.425x[10 -3 ]x7273x275/1.00=850.0kN
-3
χz·Nrk/
γ Μ1=χz·A·fy/γΜ1= 0.962x[10 ]x7273x275/1.00=1924.1kN
χLT·My,rk/ γΜ1= 1.000x[10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/1.00=280.2kNm
γ Μ1=χLT·Wpl,y·fy/
kyy=Cmy·CmLT(
μy/(1-Ned/Ncr,y)(1/Cyy), μy=(1-Ned/Ncr,y)/(1-χy·Ned/Ncr,y) (EC3 Tab.A.1)
kzy=Cmy·CmLT(
μz/(1-Ned/Ncr,y)(1/Czy)0.60 Ö (wy/wz), μz=(1-Ned/Ncr,z)/(1-χz·Ned/Ncr,z)
-3
Ncr,y=π²
Ε Ιy/lcr,y²=3.14²x[10 ]x210000x162.70x10 6 /17907²= 1052 kN
-3
Ncr,z=π²
Ε Ιz/lcr,z²=3.14²x[10 ]x210000x10.430x10 6 / 1000²= 21617 kN
Ncr,t=(1/ip²)x(G·It +π² Ε Ιw/Lcr,t²) (EC3 NCCI SN003b-EN-EU)
Ncr,t=[10 -3 ]x(1/154²)[80769x 0.373x106 +π²x210000x313.58x109 /1971²]=8296 kN
wy=Wpl,y/Wel,y<=1.50, wy= 1.019x10 6 / 0.904x10 6 =1.128 <= 1.50 (EC3 Annex A.1)
wz=Wpl,z/Wel,z<=1.50, wz= 0.191x10 6 / 0.123x10 6 =1.556 > 1.50 , wz=1.50
npl=Ned/(Nrk/γΜ1)=115.95/(2000.10/1.00)=0.058
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 39
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 40
-
λ max=max(1.386,0.306)=1.390 (EC3 Annex A.1)
Mcr,o=(1.00/2.20)x7880.90=3574.2, C1=1.00
-
λ o= Ö ([10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/3574.2)=0.280
-
λ o,lim=0.2 Ö C1 [(1-Ned/Ncr,z)(1-Ned/Ncr,t)] 0.25 (EC3 Annex A.1)
-
λ o,lim=0.2 Ö 2.205 [(1-115.9/21617)(1-115.9/8296)] 0.25 =0.296
εy=(My,ed/Ned)(A/Wel)=([10 3 ]x145.15/115.95)x(7273.0/903.60x10 3 )=10.08
- -
Cyy=1+(wy-1)[(2-1.6Cmy²·λ max/wy-1.6Cmy²·λ max²/wy)npl-blt]>=Wel,y/Wpl,y (Annex A, T.A.1)
-
blt=0.5alt·λ o²[My,ed/(
χ,lt·Mpl,y,rd)](Mz,ed/Mpl,z,rd) =
=0.5x0.998x0.280²[0.0/(1.000x248.5)](0.0/33.8) = 0.000
Cyy=1+(1.128-1)[(2-1.6x1.027²x1.390/1.128-1.6x1.027²x1.390²/1.128)x0.058-0.000]=0.978
Cyy>=903.60x10 3 /1019.0x10 3 =0.887, Cyy=0.978
-
Czy=1+(wy-1)[(2-14.0Cmy²· λ max²/wy5 )npl-dlt]>=0.6 Ö (wy/wz)(Wel,y/Wpl,y) (Annex A, T.A.1)
- - 4
dlt=2alt·[λ o/(0.1+ λ z )][My,ed/(Cmy· χ,lt·Mpl,y,rd)][Mz,ed/(Cmz·Mpl,z,rd)]=
=20.998x[0.280/(0.1+0.306 4 )][0.0/(1.027x1.000x248.5)][0.0/(1.000x33.8)]=0.000
5
Czy=1+(1.128-1)[(2-14.0x1.027²x1.390²/1.128 )0.058-0.000]=0.899
Czy>=0.6 Ö (1.128/1.500)(903.60x10 /1019.0x10 3 )=0.461, Czy=0.899
3
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Ned/(χy·Nrk/
γ Μ1)+kyy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/
γ Μ1)= (EC3 Eq.6.61)
115.9/(0.425x2000.1/1.00)+1.102x145.1/(1.000x280.2/1.00)=0.136+0.571=0.707
0.707< 1.000, Is verified
Ned/(χz·Nrk/
γ Μ1)+kzy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/
γ Μ1)= (EC3 Eq.6.62)
115.9/(0.962x2000.1/1.00)+0.668x145.1/(1.000x280.2/1.00)=0.060+0.346=0.406
0.406< 1.000, Is verified
13.8. Flexural Buckling, Rafter end-span region (Ultimate Limit State) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.1)
Nc,ed=138.58 kN, Lcr,y=17.907 m, Lcr,z=6.000 m
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Buckling lengths: Lcr,y=1.971x9086=17907mm, Lcr,z=0.660x9086=6000mm
Non-dimensional slenderness (Cross-section Class: 1 ) (EC3 §6.3.1.3)
-
λ y= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,y)=(Lcr,y/iy)·(1/
λ1)=(17907/149.6)x(1/86.39)=1.386
-
λ z= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,z)=(Lcr,z/iz)·(1/
λ1)=(6000/ 37.9)x(1/86.39)=1.834
λ1=π Ö (E/fy)=93.9ε=86.39, ε= Ö (235/fy)=0.92
h/b=360/170=2.12>=1.20, tf=12.7mm<=40 mm
y-y buckling curve:a, imperfection factor: αy=0.21, χy=0.425 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φy=0.5[1+αy( λ y-0.2)+ λ y²]=0.5x[1+0.21x(1.386-0.2)+1.386²]=1.585
-
χy=1/[Φy+ Ö (Φy²-λ y²)]=1/[1.585+Ö (1.585²-1.386²)]=0.425 <=1χy=0.425
z-z buckling curve:b, imperfection factor: αz=0.34, χz=0.244
- -
Φz=0.5[1+αz( λ z-0.2)+ λ z²]=0.5x[1+0.34x(1.834-0.2)+1.834²]=2.460
-
χz=1/[Φz+ Ö (Φz²-λ z²)]=1/[2.460+Ö (2.460²-1.834²)]=0.244 <=1χz=0.244
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 40
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 41
- - -
Reduction factor χ=1/[Φ+ Ö (Φ²-λ ²)], χ<=1.0, Φ=0.5[1+α( λ -0.2)+ λ ²], χ=0.244 (EC3 Eq.6.49)
γΜ1= 0.244x[10 -3 ]x7273x275/1.00=488.02kN
Nb,rd=χ·A·fy/ (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 138.58 kN < 488.02 kN =Nb,rd, Is verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 138.58/488.02= 0.284<1
13.9. Lateral torsional buckling, Rafter end-span region (ULS) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.2)
My,ed=213.47 kN, L=9.086m, Lcr,y=17.907m, Lcr,z=6.000m, Lcr,lt=6.000m
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Elastic critical moment for lateral-torsional buckling (EC3 §6.3.2.2.2, EN1993:2002 AnnexC)
Timoshenko,S.P, Gere,J.M, Theory of elastic stability, McGraw-Hill, 1961
Mcr=C1·[ π²EIz/(kL)²]{
Ö [(kz/kw)²(Iw/Iz)+(kL)²GIt/( π²EIz)+(C2·zg-C3·zj)²] -(C2·zg-C3·zj)}
Method of computation C1,C2,C3 : ECCS 119/Galea SN030a-EN-EU Access Steel 2006
μ=Mo/M=qL²/8M=-81.5/213.5=-0.38, ψ=Mb/Ma=143.7/-213.5=-0.67, C1=2.636, C2=0.374
4
G=E/(2(1+ν))=210000/(2(1+0.30))=80769=8.1x10 N/mm²
k·L=6000mm, zg=h/2=360/2=180mm, zj=0mm (EN1993:2002 Eq.C.11)
ky=1.0, kz=1.0, kw=1.0, C1=2.636, C2=0.374, C3=0.000
Mcr=[10 -6 ]2.636x[π²x2.1x105 x10.430x10 6 /6000²]
x{ [(1.0/1.0)²x(313.58x109 /10.430x10 6 )
+6000²x8.1x104 x0.373x10 6 /(π²x2.1x105 x10.430x10 6 )
+(0.374x180)²]0.5 -(0.374x180) }= 354.3 kNm
-
λ ,lt= Ö (Wpl,y·fy/Mcr)=Ö {[10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/354.3}=0.889 (EC3 Eq.6.56)
h/b=360/170=2.12>2.00 buckling curve: c
imperfection factor: α,lt=0.49, β=0.75, χ,lt=0.708 (T.6.3, T.6.5, Fig.6.4)
- - -
Φ,lt=0.5[1+α,lt( λ ,lt- λ ,lto)+β λ ,lt²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(0.889-0.40)+0.75x0.889²]=0.916
-
χ,lt=1/[Φ,lt+ Ö (Φ,lt²-β λ ,lt²)]=1/[0.916+Ö (0.916²-0.75x0.916²)]=0.708
- -
Reduction factor χ,lt=1/[Φ,lt+ Ö (Φ,lt²- β λ ,lt²)], χ,lt<=1.0, 1/ λ ,lt², χ,lt=0.708 (Eq.6.57)
-
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f, χ,lt,mod<=1, χ,lt,mod<=1/ λ ,lt²=1/0.889²=1.26 (EC3 §6.3.2.3(2),Eq.6.58)
Kc=1/(1.33-0.33ψ)=0.752, ψ=0.00 (EC3 Tab.6.6)
-
f=1-0.5(1-kc)[1-2.0( λ ,lt-0.8)²]=1-0.5x(1-0.752)[1-2.0x(0.889-0.8)²]=0.878, f<=1.0
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f=0.708/0.878=0.806, χ,lt,mod<=1.0, χ,lt,mod<=1.26, χ,lt,mod=0.806
13.10. Axial force and bending moment, Rafter end-span region (ULS) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.3)
Ned=138.58 kN, My,ed=213.47 kNm
Ned/(χy·Nrk/ γ Μ1)+kyy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/ γ Μ1)<=1 (EC3 Eq.6.61)
Ned/(χz·Nrk/ γ Μ1)+kzy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/ γ Μ1)<=1 (EC3 Eq.6.62)
Nrk=A·fy=[10-3 ]x7273x275=2000.1 kN (Tab.6.7)
My,rk=Wpl,y·fy=[10-6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275=280.2 kNm
χy·Nrk/
γ Μ1=χy·A·fy/γΜ1= 0.425x[10 -3 ]x7273x275/1.00=850.0kN
-3
χz·Nrk/
γ Μ1=χz·A·fy/γΜ1= 0.244x[10 ]x7273x275/1.00=488.0kN
χLT·My,rk/ γΜ1= 0.806x[10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/1.00=225.9kNm
γ Μ1=χLT·Wpl,y·fy/
kyy=Cmy·CmLT(
μy/(1-Ned/Ncr,y)(1/Cyy), μy=(1-Ned/Ncr,y)/(1-χy·Ned/Ncr,y) (EC3 Tab.A.1)
kzy=Cmy·CmLT(
μz/(1-Ned/Ncr,y)(1/Czy)0.60 Ö (wy/wz), μz=(1-Ned/Ncr,z)/(1-χz·Ned/Ncr,z)
-3
Ncr,y=π²
Ε Ιy/lcr,y²=3.14²x[10 ]x210000x162.70x10 6 /17907²= 1052 kN
Ε Ιz/lcr,z²=3.14²x[10]x210000x10.430x10 6 / 6000²=
Ncr,z=π² -3
600 kN
Ncr,t=(1/ip²)x(G·It +π² Ε Ιw/Lcr,t²) (EC3 NCCI SN003b-EN-EU)
Ncr,t=[10 -3 ]x(1/154²)[80769x 0.373x106 +π²x210000x313.58x109 /11824²]=1462 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 41
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 42
wy=Wpl,y/Wel,y<=1.50, wy= 1.019x10 6 / 0.904x10 6 =1.128 <= 1.50 (EC3 Annex A.1)
wz=Wpl,z/Wel,z<=1.50, wz= 0.191x10 6 / 0.123x10 6 =1.556 > 1.50 , wz=1.50
npl=Ned/(Nrk/γΜ1)=138.58/(2000.10/1.00)=0.069
-
λ max=max(1.386,1.834)=1.830 (EC3 Annex A.1)
Mcr,o=(1.00/2.64)x354.30=134.4, C1=1.00
-
λ o= Ö ([10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/134.4)=1.440
-
λ o,lim=0.2 Ö C1 [(1-Ned/Ncr,z)(1-Ned/Ncr,t)] 0.25 (EC3 Annex A.1)
-
λ o,lim=0.2 Ö 2.636 [(1-138.6/600)(1-138.6/1462)] 0.25 =0.297
εy=(My,ed/Ned)(A/Wel)=([10 3 ]x213.47/138.58)x(7273.0/903.60x10 3 )=12.40
- -
Cyy=1+(wy-1)[(2-1.6Cmy²·λ max/wy-1.6Cmy²·λ max²/wy)npl-blt]>=Wel,y/Wpl,y (Annex A, T.A.1)
-
blt=0.5alt·λ o²[My,ed/(
χ,lt·Mpl,y,rd)](Mz,ed/Mpl,z,rd) =
=0.5x0.998x1.440²[0.0/(0.806x248.5)](0.0/33.8) = 0.000
Cyy=1+(1.128-1)[(2-1.6x1.007²x1.830/1.128-1.6x1.007²x1.830²/1.128)x0.069-0.000]=0.952
Cyy>=903.60x10 3 /1019.0x10 3 =0.887, Cyy=0.952
-
Czy=1+(wy-1)[(2-14.0Cmy²· λ max²/wy5 )npl-dlt]>=0.6 Ö (wy/wz)(Wel,y/Wpl,y) (Annex A, T.A.1)
- - 4
dlt=2alt·[λ o/(0.1+ λ z )][My,ed/(Cmy· χ,lt·Mpl,y,rd)][Mz,ed/(Cmz·Mpl,z,rd)]=
=20.998x[1.440/(0.1+1.834 4 )][0.0/(1.007x0.806x248.5)][0.0/(0.000x33.8)]=0.000
5
Czy=1+(1.128-1)[(2-14.0x1.007²x1.830²/1.128 )0.069-0.000]=0.788
Czy>=0.6 Ö (1.128/1.500)(903.60x10 /1019.0x10 3 )=0.461, Czy=0.788
3
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Ned/(χy·Nrk/
γ Μ1)+kyy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/
γ Μ1)= (EC3 Eq.6.61)
138.6/(0.425x2000.1/1.00)+1.360x213.5/(0.806x280.2/1.00)=0.163+1.286=1.449
1.449> 1.000, Is NOT verified
Ned/(χz·Nrk/
γ Μ1)+kzy·My,ed/(
χLT·My,rk/
γ Μ1)= (EC3 Eq.6.62)
138.6/(0.244x2000.1/1.00)+0.757x213.5/(0.806x280.2/1.00)=0.284+0.716=0.999
0.999< 1.000, Is verified
13.12. Flexural Buckling, Rafter-Uplift conditions (Ultimate Limit State) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.1)
Nc,ed=0.44 kN, Lcr,y=17.907 m, Lcr,z=6.000 m
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
Buckling lengths: Lcr,y=1.971x9086=17907mm, Lcr,z=0.660x9086=6000mm
Non-dimensional slenderness (Cross-section Class: 1 ) (EC3 §6.3.1.3)
-
λ y= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,y)=(Lcr,y/iy)·(1/
λ1)=(17907/149.6)x(1/86.39)=1.386
-
λ z= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,z)=(Lcr,z/iz)·(1/
λ1)=(6000/ 37.9)x(1/86.39)=1.834
λ1=π Ö (E/fy)=93.9ε=86.39, ε= Ö (235/fy)=0.92
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 42
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 43
h/b=360/170=2.12>=1.20, tf=12.7mm<=40 mm
y-y buckling curve:a, imperfection factor: αy=0.21, χy=0.425 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φy=0.5[1+αy( λ y-0.2)+ λ y²]=0.5x[1+0.21x(1.386-0.2)+1.386²]=1.585
-
χy=1/[Φy+ Ö (Φy²-λ y²)]=1/[1.585+Ö (1.585²-1.386²)]=0.425 <=1χy=0.425
z-z buckling curve:b, imperfection factor: αz=0.34, χz=0.244
- -
Φz=0.5[1+αz( λ z-0.2)+ λ z²]=0.5x[1+0.34x(1.834-0.2)+1.834²]=2.460
-
χz=1/[Φz+ Ö (Φz²-λ z²)]=1/[2.460+Ö (2.460²-1.834²)]=0.244 <=1χz=0.244
- - -
Reduction factor χ=1/[Φ+ Ö (Φ²-λ ²)], χ<=1.0, Φ=0.5[1+α( λ -0.2)+ λ ²], χ=0.244 (EC3 Eq.6.49)
-3
Nb,rd=χ·A·fy/
γΜ1= 0.244x[10 ]x7273x275/1.00=488.02kN (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 0.44 kN < 488.02 kN =Nb,rd, Is verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 0.44/488.02= 0.001<1
Hogging
k·L=6000mm, zg=-180mm, zj=0mm (EN1993:2002 Eq.C.11)
ky=2.0, kz=1.0, kw=1.0, C1=1.000, C2=0.000, C3=1.000
Mcr=[10 -6 ]1.000x[π²x2.1x105 x10.430x10 6 /6000²]
x{ [(1.0/1.0)²x(313.58x109 /10.430x10 6 )
+6000²x8.1x104 x0.373x10 6 /(π²x2.1x105 x10.430x10 6 )] 0.5 }= 170.1 kNm
-
λ ,lt= Ö (Wpl,y·fy/Mcr)=Ö {[10 -6 ]x1019.0x10 3 x275/170.1}=1.284 (EC3 Eq.6.56)
h/b=360/170=2.12>2.00 buckling curve: c
imperfection factor: α,lt=0.49, β=0.75, χ,lt=0.483 (T.6.3, T.6.5, Fig.6.4)
- - -
Φ,lt=0.5[1+α,lt( λ ,lt- λ ,lto)+β λ ,lt²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(1.284-0.40)+0.75x1.284²]=1.334
-
χ,lt=1/[Φ,lt+ Ö (Φ,lt²-β λ ,lt²)]=1/[1.334+Ö (1.334²-0.75x1.334²)]=0.483
- -
Reduction factor χ,lt=1/[Φ,lt+ Ö (Φ,lt²- β λ ,lt²)], χ,lt<=1.0, 1/ λ ,lt², χ,lt=0.483 (Eq.6.57)
-
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f, χ,lt,mod<=1, χ,lt,mod<=1/ λ ,lt²=1/1.284²=0.61 (EC3 §6.3.2.3(2),Eq.6.58)
Kc=1.00 (EC3 Tab.6.6)
-
f=1-0.5(1-kc)[1-2.0( λ ,lt-0.8)²]=1-0.5x(1-1.000)[1-2.0x(1.284-0.8)²]=1.000, f<=1.0
χ,lt,mod=χ,lt/f=0.483/1.000=0.483, χ,lt,mod<=1.0, χ,lt,mod<=0.61, χ,lt,mod=0.483
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 43
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 44
The haunch is fabricated by cutting and welding of an IPE 360 section - S 275
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
at haunch end at haunch-middle at haunch-start
Ned = 138.6 kN Ned = 134.2 kN Ned = 129.9 kN
Ved = 143.3 kN Ved = 127.6 kN Ved = 111.9 kN
Myed = 419.5 kNm Myed = 321.2 kNm Myed = 213.5 kNm
Web
c=720.0-2x12.7-2x18.0=658.6 mm, t=8.0 mm, c/t=658.6/8.0=82.32 fy
S 275 , t= 8.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
αc
Position of neutral axis for combined Bending and compression
c
Ned/(2tw·fy/
γM0)=138600/(2x8.0x275/1.00)=31.5 mm
α=(658.6/2+31.5)/658.6=0.548>0.5
fy
c/t=82.32>456x0.92/(13x0.548-1)=68.53
The web is not class 1 or 2
ψ fy
Flange
c=170.0/2-8.0/2-18.0=63.0 mm, t=12.7 mm, c/t=63.0/12.7=4.96
S 275 , t=12.7<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
c/t=4.96<=9ε=9x0.92=8.28
The flange is class 1 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2) c
14.2. Resistance of cross-section, at haunch end (Ultimate Limit State) (EN1993-1-1, §6.2)
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for bending moment y-y (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.5)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
My.ed=419.50 kNm
Bending Resistance γ Μ0=[10 -6 ]x2120.9x10 3 x275/1.00= 583.24kNm
Mely,rd=Wely·fy/
My,ed= 419.50 kNm < 583.24 kNm =My,rd=Mply,rd, Is verified
My,ed/My,rd= 419.50/583.24= 0.719<1
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 44
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 45
hw/tw=(720.0-2x12.7)/8.0=707.3/8.0=88.41>72x0.92/1.00=72ε/η=66.24 (η=1.00)
S 275 , t= 8.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92
Shear buckling resistance must be verified (EC3 §6.2.6.6)
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for axial force, shear and bending (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.9)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
N.ed= 138.60kN (Compression), Vz.ed= 143.30kN, My.ed= 419.50kNm
Nplrd=2715.57kN, Mel,y,rd=583.24kNm, Vpl,z,rd=670.61kN
Ned=138.60kN <= 0.25x2715.57=0.25xNplrd=678.89kN
Ned=138.60kN <= [10 -3 ]x0.5x707.3x8.0x275/1.00=0.5hw·tw·fy/
γM0=778.03 kN
n=Ned/Nplrd=139/2716= 0.051
Effect of axial force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.9.1 Eq.6.33, Eq.6.34, Eq.6.35)
Ved=143.30kN <= 0.50x670.61=0.50xVpl,rd=335.30kN
Effect of shear force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.8.2)
14.3. Out-of-plane buckling, at haunch end (Ultimate Limit State) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.2.4)
We check an equivalent T-section for the compressive part of the haunch section
The equivalent T-section is made of the bottom flange and 1/3 of the compressed part of the web
Properties of equivalent T-section
Depth of cross section hf = 120 mm
Width of cross section bf = 170 mm
Web thickness tw = 8.00 mm
Flange thickness tf = 12.70 mm
2
Area Af = 3017 mm
6 4
Second moment of area If,z = 5.200x10 mm
Radius of gyration if,z = Ö ( 5.200x10 6 /3017) =41.5 mm
-
λ z= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,z)=(Lcr,z/iz)·(1/
λ1)=(1800/ 41.5)x(1/86.39)=0.502
f,z-f,z buckling curve:c, imperfection factor: αf,z=0.49, χf,z=0.842 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φf,z=0.5[1+αf,z( λ f,z-0.2)+ λ f,z²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(0.502-0.2)+0.502²]=0.700
-
χf,z=1/[Φf,z+ Ö (Φf,z²-λ f,z²)]=1/[0.700+Ö (0.700²-0.502²)]=0.842 <=1χf,z=0.842
Nb,rd=χz·A·fy/ γΜ1= 0.842x3017x275/1.00=698.68kN (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 639.18 kN < 698.68 kN =Nb,rd, Is verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 639.18/698.68= 0.915<1
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 45
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 46
Web
c=540.0-2x12.7-2x18.0=478.6 mm, t=8.0 mm, c/t=478.6/8.0=59.83 fy
S 275 , t= 8.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
αc
Position of neutral axis for combined Bending and compression
c
Ned/(2tw·fy/
γM0)=134200/(2x8.0x275/1.00)=30.5 mm
α=(478.6/2+30.5)/478.6=0.564>0.5
f
396x0.920/(13x0.564-1)=57.57<c/t=59.83<=456x0.920/(13x0.564-1)=66.29 y
The web is class 2 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2)
Flange
c=170.0/2-8.0/2-18.0=63.0 mm, t=12.7 mm, c/t=63.0/12.7=4.96
S 275 , t=12.7<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 +
c/t=4.96<=9ε=9x0.92=8.28
The flange is class 1 (EN1993-1-1, Tab.5.2) c
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for bending moment y-y (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.5)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
My.ed=321.20 kNm
Bending Resistance γ Μ0=[10 -6 ]x1668.1x10 3 x275/1.00= 458.72kNm
Mply,rd=Wply·fy/
My,ed= 321.20 kNm < 458.72 kNm =My,rd=Mply,rd, Is verified
My,ed/My,rd= 321.20/458.72= 0.700<1
hw/tw=(540.0-2x12.7)/8.0=527.3/8.0=65.91<=72x0.92/1.00=72ε/η=66.24 (η=1.00)
S 275 , t= 8.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92
Shear buckling resistance is not necessary to be verified (EC3 §6.2.6.6)
Ultimate Limit State, Verification for axial force, shear and bending (EN1993-1-1, §6.2.9)
Maximum design values. Verification for load case: L.C. 212: 1.35xGk+1.50Qs1+0.90Qw2
N.ed= 134.20kN (Compression), Vz.ed= 127.60kN, My.ed= 321.20kNm
Nplrd=2319.57kN, Mpl,y,rd=458.72kNm, Vpl,z,rd=742.35kN
Ned=134.20kN <= 0.25x2319.57=0.25xNplrd=579.89kN
Ned=134.20kN <= [10 -3 ]x0.5x527.3x8.0x275/1.00=0.5hw·tw·fy/
γM0=580.03 kN
n=Ned/Nplrd=134/2320= 0.058
Effect of axial force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.9.1 Eq.6.33, Eq.6.34, Eq.6.35)
Ved=127.60kN <= 0.50x742.35=0.50xVpl,rd=371.17kN
Effect of shear force is neglected (EC3 §6.2.8.2)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 46
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 47
-
λ z= Ö (A·fy/Ncr,z)=(Lcr,z/iz)·(1/
λ1)=(1800/ 43.3)x(1/86.39)=0.482
f,z-f,z buckling curve:c, imperfection factor: αf,z=0.49, χf,z=0.853 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φf,z=0.5[1+αf,z( λ f,z-0.2)+ λ f,z²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(0.482-0.2)+0.482²]=0.685
-
χf,z=1/[Φf,z+ Ö (Φf,z²-λ f,z²)]=1/[0.685+Ö (0.685²-0.482²)]=0.853 <=1χf,z=0.853
Nb,rd=χz·A·fy/ γΜ1= 0.853x2777x275/1.00=651.51kN (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 660.14 kN > 651.51 kN =Nb,rd, Is NOT verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 660.14/651.51= 1.013>1
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 47
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 48
Connections
15.2. Edge distances and spacing of bolts (eave, apex) (EN1993-1-8, §3.5, Tab.3.3)
15.3. Design resistance of individual bolts (eave, apex) (EC3-1-8 §3.6.1, Tab.3.4)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 48
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 49
50
Bolts M30, Bolt strength grade 10.9
113
Number of Bolts top 2x1=2
bottom 2x3=6
Total number of bolts =8
374
Diameter of holes do = 33 mm
Shear plane of bolt through the threated portion
687
113
Edge distances and spacing of bolts
100
226
Distance of plate edge to bolt line e1=e2=ex= 50 mm
Distance of section edge to bolt line ec= 46 mm
113
Distance of flange enge to bolt line ef= 50 mm
50
Pitch between bolt rows p1=p3=p= 100 mm
Spacing between cross centers p2=g =w= 100 mm 200
Flange to end-plate weld atf>= 0.55tf=0.55x12.7= 7 mm
Web to end-plate weld aw>= 0.55tw=0.55x 8.0= 6 mm
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 49
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 50
16.5. End-Plate, Resistance of T-stub flange (Apex connection) (EC3-1-8 §6.2.4.1, Tab.6.2)
16.6. Rafter flange and web in compression (Apex connection) (EC3-1-8 §6.2.6.7)
Fc,fb,rd= Mc,rd/(h-tf), Mc,rd= Wel,y·fy/ γM0
3
Wel,y=(170x12.7x574.1²+8.0x561.4³/6)/587=1614.7x10 mm³
Mc,rd= [10 ]x1614.7x10 x275/1.00=444kNm, Fc,fb,rd=[10 3 ]x444/574.1= 773kN
-6 3
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 50
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:52
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 51
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 51
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 52
374
Diameter of holes do = 33 mm
100
Shear plane of bolt through the threated portion
897
Edge distances and spacing of bolts
386
Distance of plate edge to bolt line e1=e2=ex= 50 mm
Distance of section edge to bolt line ec= 46 mm
Distance of flange enge to bolt line ef= 50 mm
113
50
Pitch between bolt rows p1=p3=p= 100 mm
Spacing between cross centers p2=g =w= 100 mm 200
Flange to end-plate weld atf>= 0.55tf=0.55x12.7= 7 mm
Web to end-plate weld aw>= 0.55tw=0.55x 8.0= 6 mm
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 52
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 53
17.5. End-Plate, Resistance of T-stub flange (Eave connection) (EC3-1-8 §6.2.4.1, Tab.6.2)
17.6. Rafter flange and web in compression (Eave connection) (EC3-1-8 §6.2.6.7)
Fc,fb,rd= Mc,rd/(h-tf), Mc,rd= Wel,y·fy/γM0
3
Wel,y=(170x12.7x734.6²+8.0x721.9³/6)/747=2230.1x10 mm³
Mc,rd= [10 ]x2230.1x10 x275/1.00=613kNm, Fc,fb,rd=[10 3 ]x613/734.6= 835kN
-6 3
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 53
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 54
17.10. Column-Side, Resistance of T-stub flange (Eave connection) (EC3-1-8 §6.2.4.1, Tab.6.2)
Ft,wc,rd = ω·beff,t,wc·twc·fy,c/γM0
β=1, ω=ω1=1/ Ö [1+1.3(beff,c·twc/Avc)²], beff,c=100.0 mm (EC3-1-8 §6.2.6.2, Tab.6.3)
ω=1/ Ö [1+1.3x(100.0x9.5/4498)²]]= 0.97
Ft,wc,rd = [10 -3 ]x0.97x100.0x9.5x275/1.00= 253 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 54
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 55
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 55
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 56
End-Plate
t=20.0mm, d=30mm, do=33mm, e1=50mm, e2=50mm, p1=100mm, fub=1000kN/mm², fu=510kN/mm²,
αb=min[fub/fu, 1.0, e1/3do, p1/3do-1/4]=
=min[1000/510, 1.0, 50/(3x33), 100/(3x33)-0.25]=0.51
k1=min[2.8e2/do-1.7,1.4p2/do-1.7,2.5]=min[2.8x50/33-1.7,1.4x100/33-1.7,2.5]=2.50
-3
Fb,rd=k1·αb·fu·d·t/
γM2= [10 ]x2.50x0.51x510x30x20.0/1.25=309 kN
Column-Side
t=16.5mm, d=30mm, do=33mm, e1=50mm, e2=50mm, p1=100mm, fub=1000kN/mm², fu=430kN/mm²,
αb=min[fub/fu, 1.0, e1/3do, p1/3do-1/4]=
=min[1000/430, 1.0, 50/(3x33), 100/(3x33)-0.25]=0.51
k1=min[2.8e2/do-1.7,1.4p2/do-1.7,2.5]=min[2.8x50/33-1.7,1.4x100/33-1.7,2.5]=2.50
Fb,rd=k1· γM2= [10 -3 ]x2.50x0.51x430x30x16.5/1.25=215 kN
αb·fu·d·t/
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 56
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 57
44
Total number of bolts =4
Diameter of holes do = 26 mm
164
Steel section for column HE 340 A, S 275
Spacing between cross centers 100 mm
Flange to end-plate weld 9 mm
90
430
Web to end-plate weld 6 mm
Concrete of foundation
18.2. Design resistance of individual bolts (Base connection) (EC3-1-8 §3.6.1, Tab.3.4)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 57
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 58
18.5. End-Plate, Resistance of T-stub flange (Base connection) (EC3-1-8 §6.2.4.1, Tab.6.2)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 58
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 59
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 59
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 60
C25/30-B500C Ned=-181kN
quk= 0.200 kN/m m Hed= 102kN
Ndst,d=+5kN
Hed2= 26kN
0.800
2.000
2.000
0.700
0.800
2.000
Dimensions
Footing Lx= 2.000 m Ly= 2.000 m
Column cx= 0.800 m cy= 0.800 m
Height of footing h= 0.700 m
Depth of footing hf= 2.000 m
Water table height hw= 1.500 m
Materials of footing
Concrete-Steel class: C25/30-B500C (EN1992-1-1, §3)
Concrete cover: Cnom=35 mm (EC2 §4.4.1)
Effective depth of cross section d=h-d1, d1=Cnom+ Æ (3/2)=35+3x14/2=56mm, d=700-56=644mm
Concrete weight: 25.0 kN/m³
γc=1.50, γs=1.15 (EC2 Table 2.1N)
fcd=αcc·fck/
γc=1.00x25/1.50=16.67 MPa (EC2 §3.1.6)
fyd=fyk/γs=500/1.15=435 MPa (EC2 §3.2.7)
Soil
Soil bearing pressure quk= 0.200 N/mm²(MPa)
Unit weight of soil γ=20.000 kN/m³
Loads
Self weight of footing (0.83+2.80)x25.00 Gf= 90.75 kN
Soil weight on footing (4.00x2.00-3.63)x20.00 Gs= 87.40 kN
Design Loads
Vertical load downwards Ned= 181.37 kN
Horizontal load Hed= 101.74 kN
Moment Med= 0.00 kNm
Vertical load upwards Ndst,d= 4.88 kN
Horizontal load Hed2= 26.14 kN
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 60
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 61
Eurocode parameters
Partial safety factors for actions : γG=1.35, γQ=1.50 (EC0 Annex A1)
Combination of accidental actions :(EC7) ψ2 =0.30
Combination of accidental actions :(EC2) ψ2 =0.30
19.4. Passive earth pressure on the side of the footing (EC7 EN1997-1-1:2004, §9.5)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 61
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 62
19.6. Check of soil bearing capacity (Concrete footing) (EC7 EN1997-1-1:2004, §6)
MEd(xx)
Med(yy)=0.125x209x2.000x(1-0.800/2.000)² = 18.85kNm
Med(xx)=0.125x209x2.000x(1-0.800/2.000)² = 18.85kNm MEd(yy)
Med(yy)=0.125x5x2.000x(1-0.800/2.000)² = 0.44kNm
Med(xx)=0.125x5x2.000x(1-0.800/2.000)² = 0.44kNm
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 62
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 63
19.9. Design for punching shear (Concrete footing) (EC2 EN1992-1-1:2004, §6.4)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 63
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 64
0m
.00
96
7.000 m
4.500 m
18.000 m
Number of frames in transverse direction 17, at 6.000m appart. Totaly 1 bracing systems
are provided. Each bracing system carries 1/1=1.00 of the total horizontal load.
The roof bracing system consists of wind girders diagonally between 18/6=3.000m points.
The vertical bracing system at the columns, consists of 2 diagonal girders
from the top to the bottom of the next column, acting as strut/tie.
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 64
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 65
h/t=100.0/10.0=10.00, (b+h)/2t=(100.0+100.0)/(2x10.0)=10.00
S 275 , t=10.0<= 40 mm, fy=275 N/mm², ε=(235/275) 0.5 =0.92 + c
h/t=10.00<=15ε=13.80, (b+h)/2t=10.00<=11.5ε=10.58
20.5. Flexural Buckling, Bracing member (Ultimate Limit State) (EN1993-1-1, §6.3.1)
Nc,ed=20.60 kN, Lcr,y=6.708 m, Lcr,z=6.708 m
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 65
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 66
h/b=330/300=1.10<1.20, tf=16.5mm<=100 mm
y-y buckling curve:b, imperfection factor: αy=0.34, χy=0.383 (T.6.2,T.6.1,Fig.6.4)
- -
Φy=0.5[1+αy( λ y-0.2)+ λ y²]=0.5x[1+0.34x(1.396-0.2)+1.396²]=1.678
-
χy=1/[Φy+ Ö (Φy²-λ y²)]=1/[1.678+Ö (1.678²-1.396²)]=0.383 <=1χy=0.383
z-z buckling curve:c, imperfection factor: αz=0.49, χz=0.777
- -
Φz=0.5[1+αz( λ z-0.2)+ λ z²]=0.5x[1+0.49x(0.614-0.2)+0.614²]=0.790
-
χz=1/[Φz+ Ö (Φz²-λ z²)]=1/[0.790+Ö (0.790²-0.614²)]=0.777 <=1χz=0.777
- - -
Reduction factor χ=1/[Φ+ Ö (Φ²-λ ²)], χ<=1.0, Φ=0.5[1+α( λ -0.2)+ λ ²], χ=0.383 (EC3 Eq.6.49)
-3
Nb,rd=χ·A·fy/
γΜ1= 0.383x[10 ]x13350x275/1.00=1406.09kN (EC3 Eq.6.47)
Nc,ed= 41.50 kN < 1406.09 kN =Nb,rd, Is verified
Nc,ed/Nb,rd= 41.50/1406.09= 0.030<1
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 66
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 67
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 67
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 68
15.52° 1319
2500
2500
IPE 360 IPE 360
7000
7000
1985
HE 340 A HE 340 A
4500
4500
9000 9000
18000
Scale 1:200 (mm)
2000
2000
700
700
800 800
7 100
2000 2000
50 100
100
50
113
M 30 10.9 7
7
897
687
100 113
7
7 7
113
50
M 30 10.9
200
113
50
200
Apex connection Scale 1:20 (mm)
M 24 5.6 430
Eave connection9Scale 1:20 (mm)
394
100
400
800
90
800
Base connection Scale 1:20 (mm)
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 68
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 69
7000
2500 4500
2000
800
HE 340 A
700
2000
9000
IPE 360
9000
HE 340 A
2000
1985
2000
800
2500 4500
7000
700
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 69
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 70
200
100 50
897
M30 10.9
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 70
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 71
113 100
113 113
100
200
50 50
687
Apex connection Scale 1:10 (mm)
M30 10.9
7
7
7
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 71
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 72
800
400
430
800
90
100
394
9
M24 5.6
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 72
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 73
Table of contents
1. Design codes
2. Basic data
2.1. Geometry of frame structure
2.2. Steel sections
2.3. Steel joints
2.4. Column b ase and foundation
3. Materials and Code parameters
3.1. Materials
4. Loads
4.1. Permanent loads
4.2. Imposed loads
4.3. Snow load
4.4. Snow load on frame
4.5. Wind load
4.6. Wind load on frame
5. Design values of Actions
5.1. Load comb ination factors
5.2. Ultimate Limit State (ULS) (EQU)
5.3. Ultimate Limit State (ULS) (STR)
5.4. Serviceab ility Limit State (SLS)
5.5. Ultimate Limit State (ULS)Seismic situation
5.6. Summary of load comb ination
6. Steel sections
6.1. Column section
6.2. Rafter section
6.3. Haunch section at haunch end
6.4. Haunch section at haunch-middle
7. Finite Element Analysis
7.1. Data used for elastic analysis
7.2. Element uniform loads, q perpendicular to element, qy vertical, qx horisontal [kN/m]
8. Results of static-linear-elastic analysis
8.1. Displacements [mm]
8.2. Reactions at the supports
8.3. Axial forces Ned [kN]
8.4. Shearing forces Ved [kN]
8.5. Bending moments Med [kNm]
9. Design of Purlins
9.1. Materials, Purlins
9.2. Loading, Purlins
9.3. Design values of Actions, Load comb inations, Purlins
9.4. Design actions, Purlins
9.5. Steel cross-section properties, Purlins
9.6. Serviceab ility Limit State (SLS), Purlins
9.7. Classification of steel cross-section, Bending My (Purlin section)
9.8. Resistance of cross-section, Purlin section
9.9. Lateral restraining of sheeting, Purlins
9.10. Lateral torsional b uckling (Purlin laterally restrained)
10. Glob al analysis
10.1. Effects of deformed geometry of the structure
10.2. Imperfections for glob al analysis
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 73
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 74
Table of contents
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 74
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:53
PFR 13/02/2020 Pg. 75
Table of contents
SteelPortalFrameEC3 Fe ne rbahce 75
software by RUNET (c)
13/02/2020 12:51:54