The Idea of Art Music in A Commercial World, 1800-1930 PDF
The Idea of Art Music in A Commercial World, 1800-1930 PDF
NOTIONAL
EDITED BY
ways, pushing back the boundaries of the ‘music as commerce’
discussion. Through diverse, multidisciplinary approaches, the
volume opens up significant paths for conversation about how
musical concepts, practices and products were shaped by
interrelationships between culture and commerce.
Christina Bashford
CHRISTINA BASHFORD is Associate Professor of Musicology at the
University of Illinois.
ROBERTA MONTEMORRA MARVIN is Director of the Opera Studies
and
Forum in the Obermann Center for Advanced Studies at the University
of Iowa, where she is also on the faculty.
Banknotes featuring Claude Debussy and Giuseppe Verdi (photos courtesy of Conrad
Marvin) and musical instruments (© Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main).
COVER DESIGN: JAN MARSHALL
Series Editors
vanessa agnew, katharine ellis,
jonathan glixon, & david gramit
Consulting Editor
tim bl anning
This series brings history and musicology together in ways that will embed social
and cultural questions into the very fabric of music-history writing. Music in
Society and Culture approaches music not as a discipline, but as a subject that
can be discussed in myriad ways. Those ways are cross-disciplinary, requiring
a mastery of more than one mode of enquiry. This series therefore invites
research on art and popular music in the Western tradition and in cross-cultural
encounters involving Western music, from the early modern period to the
twenty-first century. Books in the series will demonstrate how music operates
within a particular historical, social, political or institutional context; how
and why society and its constituent groups choose their music; how historical,
cultural and musical change interrelate; and how, for whom, and why music's
value undergoes critical reassessment.
Proposals or queries should be sent in the first instance to the series editors
or Boydell & Brewer at the addresses shown below.
Dr Vanessa Agnew, University of Duisburg-Essen,
Department of Anglophone Studies, r12 s04 h,
Universitaetsstr. 12, 45141 Essen, Germany
email: [email protected]
Professor Katharine Ellis, Department of Music, University of Bristol,
Victoria Rooms, Queen’s Road, Clifton, bs8 1sa, UK
email: [email protected]
Professor Jonathan Glixon, School of Music, 105 Fine Arts Building,
University of Kentucky, Lexington, ky 40506–0022, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
Professor David Gramit, Department of Music, University of Alberta,
3–82 Fine Arts Building, Edmonton, Alberta, t6g 2c9, Canada
e-mail: [email protected]
Boydell & Brewer, PO Box 9, Woodbridge, Suffolk, ip12 3df, UK
email: [email protected]
Previously published titles in the series are listed at the back of this volume.
Edited by
Christina Bashford and
Roberta Montemorra Marvin
List of Figures vii
List of Tables ix
Notes on Contributors x
Acknowledgements xiii
A Note on Translations xiii
Bibliographic Abbreviations xiv
introduction
The Idea of Art Music in a Commercial World
Christina Bashford 1
part i publishers
1 Selling ‘Celebrity’: The Role of the Dedication in Marketing Piano
Arrangements of Rossini’s Military Marches
Denise Gallo 18
2 Creating Success and Forming Imaginaries: The Innovative Publicity
Campaign for Puccini’s La bohème
Michela Ronzani 39
3 Novello, John Stainer and Commercial Opportunities in the Nineteenth-
Century British Amateur Music Market
David Wright 60
part v settings
11 Schicht, Hauptmann, Mendelssohn and the Consumption of Sacred Music in
Leipzig
Jeffrey S. Sposato 250
12 The Business of Music on the Peripheries of Empire: A Turn-of-the-Century
Case Study
David Gramit 274
13 ‘Disguised Publicity’ and the Performativity of Taste: Musical Scores in
French Magazines and Newspapers of the Belle Époque
Jann Pasler 297
Index 327
vi
vii
Tables
A volume such as this one is the fruit of the labours of many people, to
whom the editors wish to express their gratitude. Our contributors, whose
invigorating and provocative perspectives on the topic inspired and challenged
us, deserve a special thanks for their patience with the editorial process and
their spirit of collegiality. Several colleagues generously shared their time and
knowledge with us along the way. We extend thanks especially to Gabriele
Dotto, Maria Pia Ferraris, James Parakilas and John Peters. We particularly
wish to acknowledge Allison McCracken for her willingness to provide us with
enlightening context for our study. Among other scholars who supported our
endeavour, we would also like to thank Hilary Poriss, Derek Scott and Ruth Solie.
Rachel Cowgill, Fabrizio Della Seta, Anna Sivuoja-Kauppala, Conrad Marvin,
Roger Parker and John Wagstaff assisted in our search for images for the book.
At several stages in the book’s gestation, Catherine Hennessy Wolter gave us
research assistance, contextual advice and technological support, for which we
are very grateful.
A number of institutions worldwide cooperated with authors; they are
acknowledged in individual chapters. The University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign’s Research Board supported Christina Bashford’s work through
a competitive Humanities Released Time Program. The University of Iowa’s
International Programs supported a virtual preparatory seminar with our authors
from the United Kingdom; our thanks go especially to Chris Clough for his
expert assistance with the technology that made our communications possible.
A companion seminar, held in Pittsburgh during the 2013 AMS meeting, was
facilitated by James Cassaro, who assisted us in securing a meeting place at the
University of Pittsburgh.
The team with whom we have worked at the Boydell Press, especially Megan
Milan and Michael Middeke, shepherded the project through with patience
and efficiency. We also wish to thank editors for the series Music in Society and
Culture, Katharine Ellis, Jonathan Glixon and David Gramit, for their interest in
the project from its inception.
A Note on Translations
The chapters in this volume employ a variety of non-English sources, primarily
Italian, German and French. In cases where this material is unpublished, the
original text is normally included in the notes. When authors rely on published
sources, the original language is not included, but the sources are identified in the
notes. Translations are by the authors unless noted.
xiii
xiv
I n 1900, a Chicago-based writer for the Music Trade Review reported that
Ignacy Jan Paderewski, the Polish pianist whose virtuosity and charismatic
platform personality on the touring circuit was making him something of a
household name from Vienna to New York, had purchased a ‘handsome’ piano
from a Connecticut manufacturer. It was to be a gift for the Paderewski Singing
Society in Chicago. The writer revelled in the marketplace advantage for any firm
that could boast a linkage with such a famous figure, commenting:
To have the name of the great pianist, whose earnings in America this
season exceeded something over $200,000, associated with any piano
is a distinct point gained in favor of that instrument, and the Huntington
manufacturers have every reason for feeling elated over the high
compliment paid them by the eminent pianist.1
Clearly, Paderewski’s alleged earnings were understood as astronomically high
(and to gain perspective here, we might note that average annual wages at the
time in the United States amounted to a mere $438).2 They were also a telling
articulation of the pianist’s artistic celebrity, which – as the writer suggests – was
poised to be leveraged by others in the marketplace. In this respect, Paderewski
was an integral part of music’s modernizing commercial world.
That commercial world – including the relationship of art, money and
performers – has become a fairly well-rehearsed topic in musicological literature,
and it forms the background for the essays in this book. Yet, as the reader will
discover, the essays approach the discussion from new directions to investigate
(among other things) how the ideas that became attached to art music in the
nineteenth century, and even the very idea of art music per se, were intertwined
with the technological advances and socio-economic shifts that were then in train.
To bring those changes into focus, we might consider that, even by 1900,
Paderewski (born 1860) would have witnessed some remarkable developments
in the music business during the course of his career. Those developments had
begun in the early nineteenth century and were catalysed by industrialization
and the swathe of advances in science, manufacturing and transportation
that followed on from it. Over the one hundred years from 1800 to 1900,
markets for music increased in size and socio-geographic spread, and they
diversified; technology improved and enhanced musical goods, from sheet
music to instruments; prices fell; new products entered the marketplace,
most significantly – in the early 1900s – with the arrival of recorded sound;
and it became possible to transport musical commodities (both people and
artefacts, carrying information and ideas) across and between continents with
relative ease and affordability. Moreover, support systems for the promotion
and advertising of musical goods developed, creating publicity mechanisms
that would have been unimaginable in their size or sophistication a century
or so earlier. In 1800, Beethoven gave his first benefit concert in Vienna, where
he was living, to a socially elite audience that was gathered largely by word of
mouth or simple advertising – notably playbills in public places, or information
in the local court newspaper, the Wiener Zeitung.3 In 1900, news about musical
culture moved around widely – and with speed – like never before; the telegraph
and, increasingly, the telephone were becoming staples of commercial life; and
more extensive rail and steamship travel networks facilitated mobility. Besides
these transformations, the packaging and the advertising of musical goods were
ever more striking visually, thanks to advances in printing and photographic
reproduction, and to growing awareness of consumer behaviour. Of course,
more than a century further on, and to a generation that has grown up with
instant global communication and subtle mechanisms for advertising, the sort of
infrastructure that Paderewski benefitted from can seem outmoded, even crude.
Yet the beginnings of the mass marketing and international dissemination of
music that we recognize today in our own media-driven, computer-led culture
can also be identified in that world of 1900. Historical continuities are sometimes
as striking as differences.
Perhaps with such connections in mind, scholars in musicology and other
disciplines have found music’s commodification an attractive area of enquiry,
especially with regard to the development of popular music and recorded-sound
technology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The studies of
Tin Pan Alley, cabaret culture, folk and popular music, mechanical pianos, and
the nascent recording industry in the United States and Europe by Charles
Hamm, Daniel Goldmark, Derek B. Scott, Steven Whiting, Karl Hagstrom Miller,
Timothy D. Taylor and James J. Nott are cases in point, as is cultural historian
David Suisman’s book Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American
Music (2009) – an important treatment of the American music industry in the
early twentieth century.4 Embracing the commerce of popular song, player pianos
3 On the local press, see Mary Sue Morrow, Concert Life in Haydn’s Vienna: Aspects
of a Developing Musical and Social Institution (Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon, 1989),
pp. 191–9. My thanks to Emily Wuchner for sharing her knowledge of source
materials relating to Viennese concert life in 1800.
4 Charles Hamm, Yesterdays: Popular Song in America (New York: Norton, 1979);
Daniel Goldmark, ‘Creating Desire on Tin Pan Alley’, Musical Quarterly 90
(2007), 197–229; Scott, Sounds of the Metropolis; Steven Whiting, Satie the
Bohemian: From Cabaret to Concert Hall (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999);
Karl Hagstrom Miller, Segregating Sound: Inventing Folk and Pop Music in the
and the phonograph, Suisman crosses nimbly between popular- and art-music
domains, thus drawing attention to the many significant intersections between
the two.5 On the whole, though, scholars have been slower to probe art music’s
identity as a commercial good, both in and before the era of recorded sound.
Admittedly several important market-focused histories of art music’s institutions,
agents, instrument manufacture, and music publishing have appeared over
the last thirty years;6 and there have been studies of art-music performers who
fit the paradigm of the mass-market artist, such as Jenny Lind – whose tour
of the United States was engineered with unprecedented commercial acuity
by the businessman P. T. Barnum – and Enrico Caruso and Amelita Galli-
Curci, stars of the early recording era.7 But for a long time, the general idea
that commercialization impacts works of art negatively held considerable sway,
likely stemming from the trenchant remarks on the subject made by Theodor
Adorno and Carl Dahlhaus and expressing their underlying assumptions that
music written for sale to large markets (i.e. popular music) could not be of high
artistic quality.8 In such a context, art music and money seem to have become
Age of Jim Crow (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010); Timothy D. Taylor,
‘The Commodification of Music at the Dawn of the Era of “Mechanical Music”’,
Ethnomusicology 51 (2007), 281–305; James J. Nott, Music for the People: Popular
Music and Dance in Interwar Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002); and
David Suisman, Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; originally published 2009).
5 A related, important study is Larry Hamberlin, Tin Pan Opera: Operatic Novelty
Songs in the Ragtime Era (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).
6 Inter alia, Cyril Ehrlich, First Philharmonic: A History of the Royal Philharmonic
Society (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995); Christopher Fifield, Ibbs and Tillett: The Rise
and Fall of a Musical Empire (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005); Craig H. Roell, The Piano
in America, 1890–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989), esp.
pp. 139–82 (‘Strategies of Piano Merchandising’); Ehrlich, The Piano; Cooper, The
House of Novello; Rupert M. Ridgewell, ‘Artaria’s Music Shop and Boccherini’s
Music in Viennese Musical Life’, Early Music 33 (2005), 179–89; and Stefano Baia
Curioni, Mercanti dell’opera: Storie di Casa Ricordi (Milan: Il Saggiatore, 2011).
7 On Lind, see George Biddlecombe, ‘The Construction of a Cultural Icon: The Case
of Jenny Lind’, NCBMS 3, pp. 45–61; Roberta Montemorra Marvin, ‘Idealizing
the Prima Donna in Mid-Victorian London’, The Arts of the Prima Donna in the
Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Rachel Cowgill and Hilary Poriss (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2012), pp. 21–41; and Steve Waksman, ‘Selling the Nightingale:
P. T. Barnum, Jenny Lind, and the Management of the American Crowd’, Arts
Marketing: An International Journal 1/2 (2011), 108–20. On Caruso, see Suisman,
Selling Sounds, pp. 106–49, and Peter Martland, Recording History: The British
Record Industry, 1888–1931 (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2013), pp. 179–204 and
316–17; on Galli-Curci, see Alexandra Wilson, ‘Galli-Curci Comes to Town: The
Prima Donna’s Presence in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, The Arts of the
Prima Donna, pp. 328–47.
8 Some of Adorno’s remarks (from a letter to Walter Benjamin in 1936 and his
Philosophie der neuen Musik, 1949), along with comment from Dahlhaus (from his
Musikästhetik, 1967) are discussed in Scott, Sounds of the Metropolis, pp. 4–6. The
much-cited essay by Walter Benjamin (‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction’, 1936) concerning an artwork’s loss of its special ‘aura’ when subject
to technological duplication may also have added to ideas of the contaminating
effects of commercialism on music.
9 There are some notable exceptions, namely Julia Moore, ‘Mozart in the Market-
Place’, JRMA 114 (1989), 18–42; Moore, ‘Beethoven and Inflation’, Beethoven Forum
1 (1992), 191–223; and John Drysdale, Elgar’s Earnings (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2013).
10 On composers writing for both art and popular music worlds, see Lydia Goehr,
The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music
(Oxford: Clarendon, 1992), pp. 209–10; and for a nuanced case study, see Anthony
Newcomb, ‘Schumann and the Marketplace: From Butterflies to Hausmusik’,
Nineteenth-Century Piano Music, ed. R. Larry Todd (New York: Routledge, 2004),
pp. 258–315. On ways of rationalizing the ‘problem’ of Beethoven writing popular
works, see Nicholas Cook, ‘The Other Beethoven: Heroism, the Canon, and the
Works of 1813–14’, 19th-Century Music 27 (2003), 3–24, at pp. 3–4.
11 David Gramit, ‘Selling the Serious: The Commodification of Music and Resistance
to It in Germany, circa 1800’, The Musician as Entrepreneur, pp. 81–101; and
Simon McVeigh, ‘“An Audience for High-Class Music”: Concert Promoters and
Entrepreneurs in Late-Nineteenth-Century London’, ibid., pp. 162–82, at p. 170.
See also David Gramit, ‘The Circulation of the Lied: The Double Life of an Artwork
and a Commodity’, The Cambridge Companion to the Lied, ed. James Parsons
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 301–14.
12 T. C. W. Blanning, ‘The Commercialization and Sacralization of European Culture
in the Nineteenth Century’, The Oxford Illustrated History of Modern Europe,
ed. T. C. W. Blanning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 120–47, esp.
pp. 120–39.
the popular music revolution (he calls it ‘the first cultural upheaval of this kind’)
complements Blanning’s narrative; his study argues that in this period new styles
and genres of music emerged, distinct from those of art music, with the principal
goal of providing entertainment commercially.13 Some scholars have dealt with
the lengths to which musicians, concert promoters and many others in the
music profession would go to disguise their reliance on commerce: perhaps the
most extensive treatment of this topic to date is by Nicholas Vazsonyi (another
author in the present volume) on Richard Wagner’s tireless efforts to promote a
particular image of himself.14
Alongside this research, other new ways of thinking about the nature and
function of art music as a commodity have opened up. One important article is
Thomas Christensen’s 1999 discussion of how the practice of transcribing music
that was conceived for concert hall or opera house into four-hand piano-duet
transcriptions intended for performance in the home altered the music’s identity
and affected the manner of its reception.15 In a more focused study of similar
repertoire for the home piano, Catherine Mayes has unravelled the constructed
understanding of eastern Europe that was perpetrated in the many dances,
variations and other genres with ‘national flavour’ published for the Viennese
drawing room, c. 1800, showing them to have been grounded in a homogenous
musical style and based on a collective imaginary of eastern European countries,
one that emphasized simplicity, artlessness and primitivism.16 A different and
productive tack has been to consider musical performance as a commercial
good: there are many models one might cite here but two may suffice to indicate
range and potential. Leanne Langley’s essay on the building of a new market
(audience) for a new product – promenade concerts – in late-nineteenth-century
London shows, among many other things, the significance of the incipient era
of department-store shopping in the development of a successful and distinctive
brand of musical experience.17 And Annegret Fauser, in her study of music at the
Paris World’s Fair of 1889, establishes how the stunt of charging people a tiny sum
18 Annegret Fauser, Musical Encounters at the 1889 Paris World’s Fair (Rochester, NY:
University of Rochester Press, 2005), pp. 279–97.
19 Suisman, Selling Sounds, p. 9.
20 For instance, Simon McVeigh and Cyril Ehrlich, ‘The Modernisation of London
Concert Life around 1900’, The Business of Music, ed. Michael Talbot (Liverpool:
Liverpool University Press, 2002), pp. 96–120. Much of the scholarship that
has emerged in relation to the consumption of art music in London has been
influenced by Ehrlich’s work, which gathered acceptance from the late 1980s (see
his ‘Market Themes’, JRMA 114 [1989], 1–5, and the preface to Music and British
Culture, pp. v–viii).
21 Scott, Sounds of the Metropolis, for example, includes as one of his case studies the
Viennese waltz, particularly the music of Johann Strauss sr and jr.
imagery in promoting an idealized notion of Jenny Lind in Britain and the United
States is a significant focus in Biddlecombe’s chapter, ‘Jenny Lind, Illustration,
Song and the Relationship between Prima Donna and Public’. What interests
him is how constructions of Lind’s persona in sheet music and other material
commodities ran counter to cultural associations of prima donnas with women of
dubious lifestyles and questionable character. By analysing images of Lind on the
sheet-music covers of ballads that she sang publicly, Biddlecombe demonstrates
that most of the illustrations were based on two paintings of her that signal
femininity, innocence and physical attractiveness. Some of the covers, along with
commercially available prints of Lind, also enhanced her body and facial features
to create an aura of beauty and unimpeachable morality. Biddlecombe argues
that, since sheet music was mostly intended for the middle-class domestic sphere
and likely purchased, played and sung by young, often unmarried, women (for
whom music-making was an important part of courtship), the Lind products
were targeted at this group, in the hope of encouraging consumers to identify
with the soprano and even to believe that a famous female singer was endorsing
their own domestic space. Moreover, he explores the qualities that attached to
the English-language ballads Lind sang in concerts in both Britain and the United
States, arguing that this repertoire connoted modesty, domesticity, emotional
restraint, and even national character and political values. Her performance of
the repertoire created, he suggests, an ideology that further revealed the singer’s
‘internal self ’ and complemented the idea of Lind that was circulating in printed
imagery.
In ‘A German in Paris: Richard Wagner and the Masking of Commodification’,
Nicholas Vazsonyi delves into the deep-rooted contradictions in Richard
Wagner’s positioning of himself and his music in the growing commercial
environment of mid-nineteenth-century Paris. The backdrop for Vazsonyi’s
analysis is both the distinction between lofty art music and the tawdry
commercial world (a concept that was already embedded in German thought),
and the paradox of Wagner’s insistence on the purity of his music as works of art
on the one hand and his denial of his reliance on the marketplace on the other.
Vazonsyi’s discussion, like Wright’s, puts significant emphasis on how commerce
affected composers, and it takes a critical look at Wagner’s manipulation of the
print media and his anti-French (often anti-Semitic) rhetoric, which exploited
the idea of the impoverished, morally superior German composer in a money-
driven, artistically moribund French capital. Vazsonyi focuses on two serialized
novellas by Wagner that feature penniless German musicians in Paris (‘Une visite
à Beethoven’ and ‘Un musicien étranger à Paris’), and he posits that they strongly
suggest Wagner was self-identifying with the protagonists while masking the
reality of the situation, namely his commitment to finding commercial success
with his operas there. Vazsonyi traces continuities in this ‘masking’ rhetoric
into the 1880s, a period when Wagner inveighed against the increasingly mass
audience for music in the commercial world; at the same time, the composer was
cannily manipulating markets in his creation of an exclusive aura around his last
opera, Parsifal.
Fiona Palmer (‘Conductors and Self-Promotion in the British Nineteenth-
Century Marketplace’) also studies conscious manipulation of self-image, here
in relation to two conductors in Britain, and at a time when the notion of the
conductor as a leadership figure endowed with celebrity was only just emerging.
Her subjects, Julius Benedict and Frederic Cowen, were no Linds or Wagners.
They led what she dubs ‘portfolio’ careers, mixing orchestral conducting with
other activities in a marketplace that still set greater store by European-born
musicians than it did by native British ones. Each man learned to promote his
own value and individuality, emphasizing, with varying degrees of success, a
different set of attributes. These included international connections, service
to Empire, championship of British music, association with the social elite, and
alignment with the pantheon of ‘great’ (European) composers of the immediate
past. Palmer compares and contrasts the two careers, demonstrating how each
man constructed a professional image – and an idea of himself as a British
conductor – through commercial outlets. She shows that writing and publishing,
as well as concert programming, interviews with journalists, and posed
photographs, proved vital tools – as did a more subtle management of the press,
the use of the power of association, and the manipulation of social connections.
Of the two men, Cowen (who was the younger) appears to have had greater
agency in the process of reputation-building; he also took an outspoken position
on the marketplace’s discrimination against native conductors and called for
high artistic standards on the podium, perhaps contributing to eventual shifts in
thinking in British culture about its own conductors.
Two essays focus on cultural constructions of musical instruments in the
commercial world. Catherine Hennessy Wolter’s ‘“ What the Piano[la] Means
to the Home”: Advertising of Conventional and Player Pianos in the Saturday
Evening Post and Ladies’ Home Journal, 1914–17’ addresses the connotations of
the player piano in American advertising – an important topic in the literature
on music and commodity – and offers fresh interpretations and a nuanced
understanding of the instrument’s commercial identity. Her analysis zeroes
in on the mid 1910s, when the player piano was finding its place in the market
and its technology was still in flux, and she sets the instrument beside the
conventional piano, which was still being widely purchased and used, though
clearly entering a period of change in regard to its cultural position. The nature
and placement of a wide variety of highly visual ads from two mass-circulating
periodicals with complementary profiles, the Saturday Evening Post and the
Ladies’ Home Journal, are at the heart of Wolter’s work, and she untangles a tight,
sometimes contradictory, knot of ideas in her sources around piano ownership,
gender, class and family, through her close observation of the ads’ iconography
for both types of instrument. Selling the modernity of the player piano or the
value of the conventional piano as furniture are among several ideas that the ads
reference. Wolter further shows how ads accentuate ways in which player-piano
operators could make an active contribution to the music that the instrument
emitted (through levers, pedals etc.) to imply that this was no mere machine, but
had expressive and artistic potential and could give the consumer agency in his
or her experience of music. At root, the varied ideas of the player piano and the
conventional piano that she uncovers in this newspaper advertising seem linked
to changing concepts of music-making in American life in the 1910s.
In ‘Art, Commerce and Artisanship: Violin Culture in Britain, c. 1880–1920’,
commentary (newspaper previews of works not yet heard and reviews of actual
performances) educated the English public about the composer’s output, creating
expectations of what a new work by Verdi ‘should be’. Her essay explores how
those expectations both shaped and were shaped by critical opinion, and how
they affected notions of marketability and actual market demand for Don Carlos
(in 1867) and Aida (in 1876) – operas in different styles from Verdi’s previous
works. Marvin argues that in the case of Don Carlos, Verdi’s French grand opera,
which transferred from Paris within a matter of weeks of its world premiere (to
be performed in Italian translation), there was not only little time for audiences
to become adequately prepared for the work, but also the press pushed the
idea that the work was problematic. With Aida, however, there was ample time
for audience demand to be stoked by journalists, who reiterated the opera’s
success abroad and its distinctive qualities (including its Egyptian-ness) while
acknowledging the music’s modern (German) flavour. In revealing much about
the English reception of Italian opera as exemplified by Verdi’s works, Marvin
unmasks important complexities in the relationship between ideas about the art
form of Italian opera and its commercial aspects in Victorian London.
The final three essays in the volume all treat interrelationships of musical
activities, cultural ideas and commercial concerns in specific settings. Jeffrey S.
Sposato (‘Schicht, Hauptmann, Mendelssohn and the Consumption of Sacred
Music in Leipzig’) provides a surprising twist to the collection by revealing the
shifting interactions in early-nineteenth-century Leipzig between the city’s
commercial concert institutions and its churches. After a long period (beginning
in the 1700s) when sacred music, such as motets, masses and cantatas, strongly
infiltrated concert programming, the church began including in its services some
of the sacred works chosen for the concert hall, in a bid to attract the archetypal
art-music consumer into the church (attendance was dwindling). Sposato
shows that close ties between the Gewandhaus Concerts and some Leipzig
churches were significant factors in this cultural exchange, as was the agency of
individuals who were involved professionally in both domains – most notably,
Johann Gottfried Schicht, Felix Mendelssohn and Moritz Hauptmann. In an era
of increasing secularization, Schicht, as Thomaskantor, successfully used the
tested techniques of the commercial world (press announcements of the music
for forthcoming services; long works ‘serialized’ over a number of weeks; and
the programming of music known to be popular in concerts) in his endeavours
to increase church attendance. Hauptmann, in the same job in the 1830s and
1840s, imitated the sophisticated repertoire choices and programming formats
favoured by Mendelssohn, the Gewandhaus director (who had been instrumental
in Hauptmann’s appointment). Sposato explores not only how the church became
influenced by the way the commercial world worked for art music, but also how
the sacred and the secular spheres became closely intertwined.
Civic culture is the focus of David Gramit’s ‘The Business of Music on the
Peripheries of Empire: A Turn-of-the-Century Case Study’ too, though here the
setting is Edmonton in Canada during the period from the 1890s into the 1920s.
Gramit’s interest is in how music was used in the building of ‘settler colonial
cities’, where life was strongly tied to the commercial and where culture was a
powerful tool for asserting modernity. Piecing together the workings and diversity
of Edmonton’s growing musical culture, he shows how the dynamics of boom and
bust affected not only the music retail business but also the provision of art music
and professional musicians, noting that with greater material prosperity in the
early twentieth century came a growth in both the demand for ‘high-class music’
and its supply. These trends are contextualized against the city’s use of art music
to symbolize its new identity as a sophisticated metropolis, as opposed to its
previous life as a frontier trading town. Gramit offers thoughts on how the idea of
art music was framed in this environment, emphasizing less any polarization with
popular traditions and more the use of both art and popular musics as symbols
of ‘metropolitan legitimacy’. As part of this legitimization, the older music of the
local indigenous culture was deliberately distanced, he says. In addition, he argues
that, as much as musical culture contributed to Edmonton’s economic growth,
it could also be presented as a corrective to the mercantile and as a civilizing
influence on the population. Yet, although settler cities were playing a significant
role in building nations and empire, in Britain there was little willingness to
recognize that fact; instead, there was a tendency within the musical press to
insist on Edmonton’s peripheral and inconsequential cultural status.
In a similarly wide-ranging discussion, Jann Pasler (‘“Disguised Publicity” and
the Performativity of Taste: Musical Scores in French Magazines and Newspapers
of the Belle Époque’) unearths an array of commercial and cultural meanings that
were signalled by the phenomenon of publishing music in French newspapers
and magazines from the 1870s into the 1920s. She shows that the issuing of
pieces that could be played on the home piano was not only a keen marketing
strategy for music publishers who were eager to generate future sales and stoke
demand, but also a form of ‘disguised publicity’ for other stakeholders in the
music business, such as theatres, concert societies, composers and performers,
whose current activities were often referenced in the newsprint that accompanied
the musical notation. Moreover, the practice itself, Pasler argues, played a role in
the ‘production and circulation of taste’, and she goes on to show the astonishing
range and amount of music – from ‘highbrow’ grand opera to popular song –
that was regularly issued in newspapers that, taken together, served a broad cross-
section of society. What emerges is a remarkable fluidity of musical genres and
styles circulating across class boundaries: art music was issued in the populist
press and popular song appeared in elite newspapers. These findings challenge
existing assumptions about the alignment of class and taste in France. Pasler
also discusses in depth Le Figaro’s patterns of music provision, suggesting that
particular score selections – aided by visual layout on the page – referenced
French politics, current affairs, intellectual fashions, national identity, foreign
cultures and more. She goes on to suggest that readers were equally being led to
a new understanding of contemporary French art music, including its expanded
tonalities, its use of dances from the Ancien Régime, and the significance of
works by women composers.
A book of this size and scope could never adequately address every country,
musical genre or topic that the subject matter suggests. As has already
been stated, the picture that the new research in The Idea of Art Music in a
Commercial World, 1800–1930 presents is inevitably limited, and its conclusions
preliminary, but the hope is that its mosaic of information and insights will spark
the reader to see patterns and connections of his or her own. Whatever gaps
may be identified in the present collection, its range of topics and approaches
lays groundwork for future investigations into this area of study. By providing a
fresh understanding of how the very idea of art music and its culture was forged
and renewed in an evolving commercial world, the volume aims to precipitate
a broader and sophisticated discussion in musicology about the nature of the
commercializing world’s impact on music in the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries. As we open up the field in this way, we may even begin to lay to rest
those residual, but powerful, taboos around the discussion of art music and
money.
Publishers
B y the mid nineteenth century, every European household that could boast
knowledge of culture owned a piano. Purposefully placed in the salons and
parlours that were sites of ritual evening musicales, these instruments created
an artistic environment that Thomas Christensen has described as ‘bourgeois
banality’.1 Dedicated domestic dilettantes and their audiences quickly wearied
of repeated repertoire, whether solo renditions or four-hand duets, and created
a classic case of economic ‘demand’. Music publishers were only too willing to
comply, generating a stream of sheet music for piano in much the same way that
internet music services in the early twenty-first century inundate their markets
with downloads.
At the centre of a network that included composers at one end of the
production process and shop owners at the other, publishers explored approaches
to increase their catalogue offerings and to promote sales. The surest strategy was
to feature music that consumers had actually heard, or at the very least that they
had heard of. Some of the most popular piano arrangements were excerpts from
famous symphonic works and, pandering to the public’s desire to be au courant,
from the latest operas. Advertisements in sales catalogues and editorial puffery
in publisher-owned journals heralded these new pieces, often by composers
of international repute but also by well-known (but now-forgotten) local and
regional personalities.
Publishers also resorted to less transparent measures that extended beyond
an appeal to their customers’ musical taste and acumen. As businessmen, they
acknowledged that sheet music was a ‘product’ that required ‘packaging’, so effort
went into its design, particularly of the first page that would attract a buyer –
the cover. Some frontispieces bore engravings, often as elaborate or colourful
Sincere thanks to Prof. Charles Brauner, Prof. James Parsons, Patricia B. Brauner,
Caitlin Miller, Elizabeth Parker, Loras Schissel and Claudio Vellutini for their kind
assistance with this research.
18
as the artwork hanging in one’s home.2 Strategically left unopened on the piano,
these richly decorative pieces graced both the instrument and the room in
which it sat.3 Even covers without images could entice the eye with ornamented
text set in varied fonts, types and letter cases. Beyond visual elements, sheet-
music covers might also display something with powerful subliminal appeal: a
‘celebrity’ dedication. Appearing within or near the title, such declarations either
stated outright or at least implied that the very music that customers held in
their hands had been written expressly for a noble or person of elevated social
status; possessing a copy was proof that its owner was among the cognoscenti. In
essence, whether a piece had musical merit or not, its dedication triggered elitism,
affording Christensen’s bourgeois a link to a social class to which they could
otherwise only aspire.4 Consumers who brought home ‘celebrity’ to display on
their pianos made as much of a statement about their awareness of who or what
was à la mode as about their ability to perform the piece itself.
The sales strategy of placing notable names on sheet-music covers perfectly
illustrates how music publishers marketed piano arrangements of what were
then (and still are) Gioachino Rossini’s least familiar works: his military marches.
Originally composed as gifts for nobles for exclusive use by their court military
bands, the marches later came into the hands of publishers who had them
transcribed into two- and four-hand piano arrangements. In all but one case,
the compositions were stripped of their original dedications and retitled with
others that spotlighted personalities whose names resonated with the broader
public. For his part, Rossini appears to have shown little interest in this activity.
Nevertheless, the rationale behind his publishers’ eagerness to market these
arrangements can be intuited easily. After the success of Guillaume Tell in 1829,
rumours flew that Rossini had abandoned not only the stage but also his creative
life as a composer, a myth that survived well into the twentieth century. If there
were to be no more operas from which publishers could cull selections for sheet
music, offering any ‘new’ Rossini music was good business. Even though Rossini’s
name had been associated with march selections from his stage works, the public
would not have known of these pieces for military bands, all of which had been
2 A celebrity performer’s image or name was often a selling point for vocal
selections, but that does not seem to have been the case for piano music.
3 Christensen (‘Four-Hand Piano Transcription’, pp. 276–9) mentions this seamless
flux between the worlds of art and music.
4 Hans Lenneberg has described a growing number of lower middle- and working-
class customers for music shops as well as for sheet music lending libraries, but
Anita Breckbill and Carole Goebes’s more recent work speaks against this class
shift. In France, for example, a lending library subscription, or abonnement de
musique, cost more than the average working-class annual salary. See Lenneberg’s
‘Music Publishing and Dissemination in the Early Nineteenth Century: Some
Vignettes’, Journal of Musicology 2 (1983), 174–83, at p. 182, and Breckbill and
Goebes’s ‘Music Circulating Libraries in France: An Overview and a Preliminary
List’, Notes, second series, 63 (2007), 761–97, at p. 782. The label on the cover of
the Sultan’s March in Figure 1.1 (p. 35 below) indicates that this sheet music was
part of W. C. de Vletter’s music lending library in Rotterdam.
5 This article deals with marches published before Rossini’s death, hence it does
not include La corona d’Italia, sent to King Vittorio Emanuele II in recognition
of his having named the composer a Grand Knight in the Order of the Crown
of Italy (La corona d’Italia) in 1868. Nor does it include the Fanfare modelled
on La corona sent to Emperor Maximilian of Mexico three years earlier. See
my ‘Rossini’s Fanfare for Maximilian of Mexico: A Mysterious Self-Borrowing’,
Historic Brass Society Journal 23 (2001), 89–102. A complete history of Rossini’s
music for band appears in the Preface (pp. xii–l in English and Italian) and the
Critical Commentary in Gioachino Rossini, Music for Band / Musica per Banda,
ed. Denise Gallo, in Works of Gioachino Rossini / Opere di Gioachino Rossini
(Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2010). The volume’s main contents and appendices include
transcriptions of all the original band pieces as well as piano arrangements of the
marches dedicated to the Duc d’Orléans and Charlotte de Rothschild discussed in
the present chapter.
On Military Marches
Before addressing Rossini’s marches, it is useful to understand military music
in general and how it served as a source both for piano arrangements and for
music that employed the march as a compositional model. In its earliest form,
military ‘music’ meant trumpets and bugles signalling charges and retreats, and
drums setting the pace for marches and attacks.6 With the inception of national
standing armies in the seventeenth century, military musicians were assimilated
into regiments and trained to play on the march, becoming the crucial units that
kept regular troops in step on parade grounds and battlefields.7 Unlike orchestras
that employed specific numbers of musicians for each section, military bands
were forced to rely on those who agreed to enlist.8 Thus when Rossini and others
offered such hommages to noble dedicatees, they created scores for generic
ensembles of portable winds, brass and percussion. It then fell to the bandmaster,
generally the first clarinettist, to tailor parts for the specific instruments available
to him. Composers like Rossini were used to working in this fashion whenever
they included stage bands in their operas, since these band parts generally were
played by military musicians on loan to theatre orchestras.9
The term ‘march’ – Marsch, marche or marcia – mimicked the action it
described, but specific types of marches took their names from the tempos at
which troops were to move when they were played. The grande marche or pas
ordinaire, for instance, was a slow, majestic ceremonial piece that maintained a
pace of roughly seventy-five steps a minute.10 The most common march, though,
amply reflected in the titles of band pieces and compositions inspired by military
music, was the pas redoublé or passo doppio, indicating a ‘double time’ gait of
108 to 118 steps per minute. Although amateur pianists may not have understood
the tempo significance of these designations, they would have recognized
these familiar march terms from sheet-music arrangements. Leipzig publisher
Friedrich Hofmeister’s Monatsberichte, a catalogue published from 1829 to 1900
(accessible online since 2004), records some 810 items as ‘marche’ and 172 more
as ‘marcia’ . Another twenty-five compositions were specifically marked ‘pas
redoublé’ and seventy-nine were labelled ‘grand marche’; among these were two-
and four-hand arrangements of the four Rossini marches under consideration.
A general search of the Monatsberichte yields some interesting statistics. Of
the catalogue’s 330,000 entries, some 145,450 (just under 44%) are arrangements
for piano alone or for piano in a variety of vocal and instrumental combinations,
demonstrating the remarkable popularity of piano sheet music.11 Included in this
number are piano arrangements of Rossini’s music, the majority excerpts from
his operas and from the Stabat mater. Yet from the catalogue’s inception in 1829
(the year of Tell’s premiere) to 1868 (the year of the composer’s death), Hofmeister
recorded only 131 new piano arrangements of Rossini’s music.12 By comparison,
sheet music for piano arranged from works of Rossini’s opera contemporaries
Gaetano Donizetti and Vincenzo Bellini totalled 481 and 334, respectively;13 the
latter’s total seems especially imposing in contrast to Rossini’s, since Bellini was
active professionally for only eight years before his death in 1835.
10 The funeral march was even slower. Rossini used one in the Act II finale of La
gazza ladra; other composers who exploited the drama of the funeral march
included Beethoven, Berlioz, Liszt and, of course, Chopin.
11 Hofmeister’s Monatsberichte tracked music and music books published primarily
(but not exclusively) in German-speaking countries, even though all publishers
and all music in that arena do not appear. The music generally was published
eight weeks before it appeared in the catalogue. This rich resource is available
as a searchable database, Hofmeister XIX (http://www.hofmeister.rhul.ac.uk),
maintained by the Department of Music at Royal Holloway, University of London
[accessed 14 July 2015]. The number of piano pieces was calculated by doing a ‘free
search’ on the mutually exclusive terms ‘piano’, ‘pianoforte’ and ‘pfte’ (http://www.
hofmeister.rhul.ac.uk/2008/content/database/search/free_text.html).
12 The database was searched on ‘Rossini’ and the terms ‘pianoforte’, ‘piano’ and
‘pfte’, using ‘and’ but ‘not’ to eliminate duplicate phrases such as ‘Pfte à 4 Mains’.
Marches arranged for full band, on the contrary, are classified in the database as
‘musique militaire’ .
13 Similar searches on the terms cited in n. 12 produced 1,141 records for Mozart and
1,078 for Beethoven.
14 The Congress of Verona (1822) was a meeting at which leaders from Austria,
Prussia, Russia, the United Kingdom and France addressed the balance of power
among European nations after the Napoleonic Wars (ended 1815). As a gesture of
friendship, the composer sent Alexander a march the following year. See Rossini’s
letter to Clemens von Metternich, dated 19 February 1823, in Lettere e documenti,
vol. 2, p. 121.
15 ‘Composé et Dédié / A S.M. Nicolas I.re / Empereur de toutes les Russies’. In
addition to signing the marches, Rossini also labelled each of them ‘Paris ce 28
J.ier 1834’. The bound manuscript is now held by Rossijskij Institut Istorii Iskusstv,
St Petersburg, Russia.
16 Galina Kopytova proposed that the entire project was suggested by the Tsar’s
emissary Count Karl Osipovič Pozzo di Borgo in the hope of easing public
opinion for Nicolas’s military assaults. See ‘Rossini in Russia’, Bollettino del Centro
Rossiniano di Studi 42 (2002), 45–53, at p. 51.
17 W. Bruce Lincoln, Nicolas I, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias
(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978), pp. 127–8.
18 In an e-mail to the author dated 25 October 2010, Kopytova shared her discovery
that Rossini’s marches were employed in a project to improve the quality of
Nicolas II’s military music.
19 The instrumentation for the Tsar’s marches comprised nineteen parts; the Oscar/
Leopold scores contained ten extra parts for PR2 and thirteen for PR1. The
additions included newer instruments such as cornets with pistons, and valved
bugles. Replacing the older serpent were more modern bass winds. The number
of parts, however, does not signify the number of musicians; for example, multiple
clarinettists could have been assigned to play the clarinet part. Only by studying
the records of a military ensemble can its size be determined.
20 Oscar’s manuscript is at the Husgerådskammaren, Bernadottebiblioteket,
Stockholm, and Leopold’s at the Glinka Museum, Moscow.
21 See Lettere e documenti, vol. 2, p. 64 n. 4, for a list of some of the political
illuminati the composer might have encountered in Verona.
22 After explaining that he was sending two ‘Pas Redoublés’ and a song, Rossini wrote
that he hoped ‘the Prince’ would be happy with him. This letter resides in Sergio
Ragni’s private collection of Rossini correspondence.
23 Alexis-Jacob Azevedo described these musicales in G. Rossini: Sa vie et ses œuvres
(Paris: Heugel, 1864), p. 197. Leopold is listed as one of Rossini’s students in
Giuseppe Radiciotti, Gioacchino Rossini: Vita documentata, opere ed influenza su
l’arte, 3 vols (Tivoli: Arti Grafiche Majella di A. Chicca, 1927–29), vol. 2, p. 36 n. 2.
24 Rossini may have delivered the marches to Leopold as he passed through Brussels
in June 1836 on the way to Lionel Rothschild’s wedding. As thanks, Leopold may
have made his friend a ‘cavaliere dell’Ordine Belga’. See Radiciotti, Gioacchino
Rossini, vol. 1, p. 194. Rossini also garnered decorations from others to whom he
dedicated marches: Crown Prince Oscar’s father, King Karl XIV Johan; Sultan
Abdul-Medjid; Emperor Maximilian I of Mexico; and Vittorio Emanuele II. See
Daniele Diotallevi, ‘Le “miserie” cavalleresche di Rossini’, Bollettino del Centro
Rossiniano di Studi 37 (1997), 69–119.
25 Emre Araci, ‘Giuseppe Donizetti at the Ottoman Court: A Levantine Life’, MT 143
(autumn 2002), 49–56, at p. 50.
26 The Coro used ‘Segna Iddio ne’ suoi confine’, a text by F. Martinelli.
27 Letter in Paolo Fabbri, Rossini nelle raccolte Piancastelli di Forlì (Lucca: Libreria
Musicale Italiana, 2001), p. 136. Rossini’s comment about ‘Political Assassins’ refers
to the above-cited difficulties in which he found himself in Bologna.
28 Ibid., p. 137.
29 According to Araci (‘Giuseppe Donizetti’, p. 54), the remainder of Donizetti’s
music is housed at the Topkapi Palace Museum Library in Istanbul. No manuscript
or band parts for the march could be located, however.
30 The Sultan’s march was sent in 1852. In a letter to Marchesa Eleonora Conti the
following July, Rossini’s wife, Olympe, bragged about the honour: see Fabbri,
Rossini nelle raccolte Piancastelli, p. 153.
31 PR1 opens with a two-measure drumroll played as a bass-clef octave roulade in the
piano arrangements. Franz Schubert employed a melodic introduction in the first
of his three Marches militaires, to be discussed later; see p. 27 below.
32 While in Paris, Richard Wagner was employed by French publisher Maurice
Schlesinger to do ‘menial work as a copyist and arranger’. See Nicholas Vazsonyi,
Richard Wagner: Self-Promotion and the Making of a Brand (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 31.
that Rossini was not interested in these arrangements, other composers worked
closely with publishers, understanding that money could be made from sheet-
music sales. Early in his career, Beethoven frequently negotiated with publishers,
even on occasion offering to arrange his own works. As his fame grew, however,
his works were given to freelance arrangers, such as Carl Czerny whose speed
and accuracy Beethoven particularly appreciated.33 Rossini dealt with publishers
as well, even during the early 1840s when his health was declining, but his
interactions were about what he may have considered a more important issue, the
publication rights for the Stabat mater, which garnered him 6,000 francs.34 In
contrast, piano arrangements of marches in which he had never really invested
much time must have seemed insignificant. His publishers, on the other hand,
saw these ‘new’ Rossini compositions as money-makers.
One final distinction needs to be made: not all marches for piano derived from
arrangements of military music. Some, like Schubert’s Marches militaires (see
n. 31 above), were composed for piano in imitation of band pieces.35 So perfectly
did Schubert adopt the military model, in fact, that the first of these marches –
perhaps the most famous of the set – was arranged for band. Furthermore,
marches found their way into the art-music repertoire via the musical stage
and the concert hall. Termed ‘higher forms of the March’ by band historian J. A.
Kappey, these compositions parodied military music – as did the march at the
close of the overture of Rossini’s Guillaume Tell, and Frédéric Chopin’s ‘Marche
funèbre’. 36 These pieces were built of rhythmic, melodic, harmonic and structural
complexities that music composed for military ensembles precluded. Moreover,
pieces that only alluded to marches allowed for artistic interpretation. Dana
Gooley has considered how a dramatist like Franz Liszt could take the decidedly
prescriptive performance of a military march and transform it into a cultural
narrative, creating an imaginary battlefield at the keyboard.37 An apt example for
the present discussion is Liszt’s Grande paraphrase de la marche pour Sa Majesté
le sultan Abdul Medjid-Khan (1847). The model, a march composed by Giuseppe
Donizetti for the Ottoman military band, demonstrates all of the characteristics
a military march required. Liszt’s extremely stylized interpretation transforms
33 See Beethoven’s letter to Czerny dated 8 October 1824 in Myron Schwager, ‘Some
Observations on Beethoven as an Arranger’, The Musical Quarterly 60 (1974),
80–93, at p. 88.
34 See B. Schofield, ‘Rossini’s “Stabat Mater”’, British Museum Quarterly 10 (1936),
109–10, at p. 110.
35 Schubert understood the popularity of the military march, frequently
employing it for piano duets. In addition to the Marches militaires were his six
Grandes marches (D. 819), three Marches héroïques (D. 602) and two Marches
charactèristiques (D. 886), all published during his lifetime. See Eric Sams,
‘Schubert’s Piano Duets’, MT 117 (February 1976), 120–1, at p. 121.
36 J[acob] A[dam] Kappey, Military Music: A History of Wind-Instrumental Bands
(London: Boosey and Co., 1894), p. 69.
37 See Dana Gooley, ‘Warhorses: Liszt, Weber’s “Konzertstück”, and the Cult of
Napoléon’, 19th-Century Music 24 (2000), 62–88.
the original into a vehicle for his pianistic virtuosity.38 When marches such as
Liszt’s and Chopin’s were destined for performance on the parlour piano, such
interpretation would have been encouraged. In contrast, a march performed by a
military band was dramatic in its spectacle, pure and simple – what can only be
called ‘Gebrauchsmusik’, music with a specific function. When military marches
like Rossini’s were arranged and sold as sheet music, they were repurposed as
‘Hausmusik’, genteel parlour entertainment.
Trou[penas] is too proud to stoop to such antics.’42 The question then was
whether Rossini had actually signed away royalties or whether said ‘Calegard’ was
actually the composer. Not only proud of his professional relationship with the
Leipzig firm, Troupenas also defended his close friend, Rossini.43
Since Breitkopf & Härtel was the entity paying the royalties, the letter must
reference their full-band arrangement and first piano versions of the Orléans
marches listed in the Monatsberichte in 1836. What is interesting is that
Troupenas also published piano arrangements of the three marches as well. As
part of a reciprocal agreement with Breitkopf & Härtel, he would have been
allowed to publish the same Breitkopf & Härtel arrangements in Paris (where, it
might seem, the Orléans dedication would have had resonance). Yet Troupenas
published his arrangements of the three marches with a dedication to Charlotte
de Rothschild (the set in which PR1 derives from the Tsar’s model). Could
Troupenas as Rossini’s agent have been behind the publication of two distinct sets
of the three marches, each with a different dedication?
Troupenas’s four-hand arrangements, published in Paris in 1837, were sold as
separate pieces of sheet music, each with the same title page, ‘deux pas Redoublés
/ et / une Marche Militaire / Composés pour / piano à quatre mains /
et dédiés / à Mademoiselle Charlotte de Rotschild’ (an unfortunate misspelling
of the dedicatée’s surname). The publication of the exact same arrangements in
London by Mori & Lavenu might seem to indicate cross-Channel piracy, but a
tacit agreement probably existed between the English firm and Troupenas’s
associate Breitkopf & Härtel since both handled the Mendelssohn repertoire
for their respective markets.44 Also publishing the marches as three separate
selections, Mori & Lavenu employed the identical title page for PR1 and
PR2, while GM, now labelled a ‘marche militaire’, had a different one; all three,
however, noted that the pieces were ‘Composés et Dédiés à / Mademoiselle
Charlotte de Rothschild’. 45
In addition to Rossini’s name, which resonated because of his international
reputation, the elitist appeal of ‘Rothschild’ was an attraction. With branches of
their banking dynasty in Paris and in London (Troupenas’s and Mori & Lavenu’s
respective markets) as well as in Frankfurt, Vienna and Naples, the family wielded
legendary power, which was even satirized by Byron in Don Juan:
Who had the balance of the world? Who reign
O’er Congress, whether royalist or liberal?
Who rouse the shirtless patriots of Spain?
(That make old Europe’s journals squeak and gibber all.)
Who keep the world, both old and new, in pain
Or pleasure? Who make politics run gibber all?
The shade of Buonaparte’s noble daring? –
Jew Rothschild, and his fellow-Christian Baring.46
At the time the pieces were published, there were three Charlottes in the
Rothschild family, but the only Charlotte still a ‘Mademoiselle’ was the daughter
of James, patriarch of the Parisian branch. Although the bankers’ surname
laces liberally throughout Rossini biographies, it was James with whom the
composer had his longest, most intimate friendship after taking up residence
in Paris in 1824.47 When Rossini returned there in 1856, after the years of illness
and depression in Italy, James was one of the few visitors he admitted. (The two
remained close in death, Rossini dying on 13 November 1868 and Rothschild
two days later.) The Rothschild Archive, which holds detailed information on
all aspects of the dynasty’s reflection in contemporary culture, not only has
no copies of the piano arrangements but also claims no knowledge of their
publication.48
In July 1837, the Monatsberichte registered the Breitkopf & Härtel
arrangements mentioned in Probst’s letter. Published as ‘Mariage de S.A.R. le Duc
d’Orléans / 3 Marche Militaire’, PR1 was sold separately in an arrangement for
four hands while a set of all three (PR1, PR2 and GM) was issued for solo piano.
45 Troupenas’s plate numbers date from the 1837 cotage; see Devriès and Lesure,
Dictionnaire des éditeurs, vol. 2, p. 77. Mori & Lavenu plate numbers allow for the
more precise dating of August 1837; see O[liver] W. Neighbour and Alan Tyson,
English Music Publishers’ Plate Numbers in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century
(London: Faber and Faber, 1965), p. 35.
46 Canto XII, verse 5, of George Gordon, Lord Byron, Don Juan in Sixteen Cantos
(New York: Frederick Campe and Co, 1832), p. 328. Referenced at the end of the
quotation is Rothschild’s fellow banker, Edward Charles Baring.
47 Radiciotti (Gioacchino Rossini, vol. 2, p. 525) notes that the Rothschilds helped the
composer accumulate a fair-sized estate.
48 In e-mail correspondence with the author in 2008, Charlotte de Rothschild also
claimed no knowledge of the Mori & Lavenu arrangements.
49 The second and third marches scored for four hands bore the subtitle ‘Trois
Marches militaires’. The entries are, respectively, Hofmeister XIX (http://www.
hofmeister.rhul.ac.uk), July 1837, pp. 85 and 89, and August 1837, p. 100.
50 (J.) Rossini, Mariage de S.A.R. le Duc d’Orléans: 3 Morceaux de musique militaire,
published in Leipzig by Breitkopf & Härtel. Hofmeister XIX (http://www.
hofmeister.rhul.ac.uk), July 1837, p. 82.
51 Jo Burr Margadant, ‘Gender, Vice, and the Political Imaginary in Postrevolutionary
France’, American Historical Review 104 (1999), 1461–96, at p. 1483.
52 The story of Ferdinand-Philippe and Helene’s engagement and marriage is outlined
by Joëlle Hureau, L’espoir brisé: Le Duc d’Orléans, 1810–1842 (Paris: Perrin, 1995),
pp. 272–93.
53 Other music marketed several months after the wedding celebrated the occasion.
See, for example, Jean-Baptiste Tolbeque’s Souvenir du 30 mai: Quadrille militaire
p. pfte. (exécuté ou [sic] bal offert par la Garde nationale de Paris à le Duc et la
Duchesse d’Orléans), published in Vienna by Mechetti. Hofmeister XIX (http://
www.hofmeister.rhul.ac.uk), November and December 1837, p. 137.
54 Carl Eberwein’s Nachruf von Weimar: Der Herzogin von Orleans Helene, geb.
Herzogin von Mecklenburg-Schwerin gewiht (Du kamst noch einmal), published by
Voigt (Kassel). Hofmeister XIX (http://www.hofmeister.rhul.ac.uk), June 1837, p. 77.
In light of the critical state of Rossini’s physical and psychological health in 1854,
if the Gazzetta musicale’s writer had contact with anyone, it would have surely
been with Liverani, acting, as Troupenas had almost twenty years earlier, on
Rossini’s behalf. For our purposes, though, this public-relations puffery perfectly
demonstrates the extent to which publishers created their own ‘truth’ to sell music.
It is noteworthy that the Gazzetta musicale’s writer questioned who might
have heard Rossini’s march. Although the Bologna Coro from which the march
was derived had never been published, anyone who had been present for its
successful performance in the Piazza Maggiore on 21 June 1848 might have
recognized the piece since its seventy-one-measure banda introduction equates
without change to the entire first section of the Sultan’s march. Almost daring
the reader to be ‘foolish’ or ‘indelicate’ enough to doubt the ‘maestro’ (and
the publisher who was marketing the piece as ‘new’), the writer suggested that
the focus be on the arrival in music shops of arrangements, available ‘within
a few days’ (‘entro pochissimi giorni’).61 As in the Allgemeine musikalische
Zeitung commentary on the Orléans marches (noted above, pp. 32–3), the
commentator linked this work to Rossini’s last internationally recognized
composition, suggesting that the Trio of the Sultan’s march ‘was perhaps
reminiscent of another March in C from Guillaume Tell ’.62 Lest musical
commentary were not enough of a selling point, the Ricordi author then resorted
to promoting the aesthetics of the sheet music itself: ‘Each piece has a different
cover, richly decorated with designs in an oriental style, superbly executed in
chromolithography.’ 63 In the end, sheet-music cover art may have been the
deciding factor in a purchase.
Ricordi’s edition of the Sultan’s march was indeed a work of art, featuring a
richly coloured cover with green lettering embellished by decorative swirls and
images in salmon, dark blue and gold. Even more of a marketing lure, though, was
the cover used by Schott: a lithograph of the Sultan himself (Fig. 1.1). One finger
hooks inside his tunic, some inches below a decorative medal.64 Cultural objects
such as the jinn, the oil lamp recognizable from Turkish culture, appear on both
sides of the page just above the Sultan’s head: two shield-like elements with
horsetails and the characteristic crescent suggest the ‘johnny jingle’, a percussion
instrument found in Ottoman marching bands. With his neatly trimmed hair and
a beard, the Sultan engages the viewer with a straightforward gaze, matching one
contemporary author’s description of him as ‘gentle and benevolent’. 65 Although
Figure 1.1 Cover of Schott’s four-hand piano edition of the Marche du Sultan, pl. no.
13296, 1854 [Courtesy of The Library of Congress, Music Division]. The label over the
publisher’s name and address indicates that this sheet music was part of the collection of
W. C. de Vletter’s music lending library in Rotterdam. (For information on sheet music
libraries, see n. 4.)
the Sultan wears a fez, his uniform is decidedly ‘Western’. Europeans were
intrigued by Abdul-Medjid, who, as many writers pointed out, was very much
like they were, enjoying Molière, promoting public education and striving for
a solid economy. The best explanation for the success of using the Sultan for a
‘celebrity’ dedication is perhaps that he was recognized and applauded as Europe’s
ally against Nicolas I during the Crimean War.66 Indeed, 1854, the publication
date of all of the piano arrangements, gains significance as it fell in the very midst
of this conflict. Displaying sheet music with the image of Abdul-Medjid on its
cover on the parlour piano made both musical and political statements.
66 Ibid., pp. 84–9.
Figure 1.2 Frontispiece for Troupenas’s four-hand piano edition of pas redoublé, no. 1, dedicated
to Charlotte de Rothschild, pl. no. T. 351, no. 1, 1837 [Courtesy of The Library of Congress, Music
Division]. Music sellers often placed their own labels over the publisher’s information; seen on this
sheet music is a label for Lodewijk Plattner’s shop in Rotterdam.
Even when one writes a masterpiece, one runs the risk of being either
unheard or pitied. The best thing to do is to wait and see, as a spectator,
how this colossal comedy will end, a comedy in which entire nations act
like puppets shaken by the strings of publicity.
Alfredo Catalani (1892)1
39
were strong prospects for rejuvenating the image of Italian opera while targeting
a previously underexploited revenue stream. Ricordi, the main Italian music
publisher of the time, was in an especially privileged position for exploring such
opportunities, since the firm owned publishing and performing rights to the
music that it published and also served as an agent (in the modern sense) for the
composers it had under contract. For these reasons, the publisher was invested
both in promoting the genre of opera and in selling its own related products.
Ricordi’s efforts to apply a modern commercial sales logic to artistic works
raised fundamental questions about the roles of author and of audience, as well
as concerns that ‘commerce’ would be detrimental to ‘art’. In the fast-growing
industrial economy of the era, commerce and marketing were becoming
increasingly important, and the emergence of associated practices triggered
worries about the commodification of culture and the relationship between
culture’s ideal aesthetic value and its necessary commercial value. With the
words cited at the opening of this essay, Alfredo Catalani, composer of the operas
Loreley (1890) and La Wally (1892), also published by Ricordi, not only expressed
concern for the importance attributed to advertising, but, more precisely, he
complained about Ricordi’s disproportional marketing of Puccini’s operas as
compared to his own. One might say – and certainly Catalani would have – that
the relative lack of publicity for his works is perhaps the reason why his name
and his operas are now almost forgotten. Beyond being an expression of the
grudge Catalani held toward his publisher, the opening quotation articulates an
increasingly widespread negative view of advertising as detrimental to art. Such
concerns were just beginning to burgeon at the time of the creation of La bohème,
but they would become fundamental in modernism.
I consider the advertising campaign for La bohème as a case study for
exploring the relationship between art and commerce in the opera world of
fin-de-siècle Italy. The campaign exemplifies the ways in which Ricordi took
advantage of opportunities created by modernization, social change, and artistic
and economic crises to develop marketing tools that contributed to the success
of composers in general and to the mythicization of Puccini in particular. A
systematic study of Ricordi’s marketing strategies in general has not been
undertaken, despite the fundamental importance of publicity in elucidating the
role of music publishers in Italy, especially with regard to creating a cultural
iconography and to shaping the relationship between opera institutions and
audiences. Although opera was central to Italian culture and to Italy’s economy,
the history of the opera industry has never been put into dialogue with the
history of advertising.3 Yet, studying publicity campaigns reveals an integrated
the reception of Puccini’s operas, Alexandra Wilson, The Puccini Problem: Opera,
Nationalism and Modernity, Cambridge Studies in Opera (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2007); on the history of the opera industry and its production
systems, Rosselli, The Opera Industry in Italy. For a broad perspective on opera
in this period, see Alan Mallach, The Autumn of Italian Opera from Verismo to
Modernism, 1890–1915 (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2007).
4 The market for opera included more than just those who attended performance; it
included constitutencies who never entered an opera house but for whom opera
was a national art and a symbol of cultural knowingness.
5 Gianni Toniolo, ‘An Overview’, The Oxford Handbook of the Italian Economy
since Unification, ed. Gianni Toniolo (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013),
pp. 3–36, at pp. 16–17.
6 For further information on the economic and social history of Italian opera
houses in the second half of the nineteenth century, see, for instance, Mallach,
The Autumn of Italian Opera, pp. 14–20; Fiamma Nicolodi, ‘Opera Production
from Italian Unification to the Present’, Opera Production and its Resources, ed.
Lorenzo Bianconi and Giorgio Pestelli (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998),
pp. 165–7; John Rosselli, Sull’ali dorate: Il mondo musicale italiano dell’Ottocento
(Bologna: Il Mulino, 1992), pp. 151–4; Marco Santoro, ‘Imprenditoria culturale
nella Milano di fine Ottocento: Toscanini, La Scala e la riforma dell’opera’, Scene
di fine Ottocento: L’Italia fin de siècle a Teatro, ed. Carlotta Sorba (Rome: Carrocci,
2004), pp. 101–45; and Sorba, Teatri, pp. 227–58.
7 The first Italian copyright law was enacted in 1865; it required permission from
an author or publisher, as well as compensation to the author or his/her heirs, for
every reproduction of any artistic or literary work for eighty years from its creation.
Although the law was not enforced for a good part of the late nineteenth century,
its principles resulted in a shift from one-time commissions from individual
impresarios to long-term and controlled use of scores by publishers with regard to
opera production. On the rights situation before 1865, see Baia Curioni, Mercanti
dell’opera , pp. 62–82; on application of the law, see Irene Piazzoni, Spettacolo,
istituzioni e società nell’Italia postunitaria (1860–1882) (Roma: Archivio Guido Izzi,
2001), pp. 224–78; on how the law affected Ricordi in particular, see Baia Curioni,
Mercanti dell’opera, pp. 82–95.
8 I refer here to the effective and insightful summaries of the so-called crisis of
Italian opera in Rosselli, Sull’ali dorate, pp. 151–69; Santoro, ‘Imprenditoria
culturale’, pp. 109–15; and Wilson, The Puccini Problem, pp. 13–22. For a more
extensive treatment of the issue, see Mallach, The Autumn of Italian Opera; and
Jay Nicolaisen, Italian Opera in Transition, 1871–1893 (Ann Arbor, MI: UMI
Research Press, 1980).
representatives for its composers; they thus formed a duopoly that had the
power to influence the opera seasons of every theatre in Italy. Both companies
also owned and managed music periodicals and were involved in theatre
management at various times and in various cities.9 Since music publishers had
access to the most advanced printing technologies, various forms of printed
media (such as brochures, posters and so on) and the press industry, they were
a link between the worlds of opera and of mass communication. Given opera’s
connections with such important players in the publishing industry, it is not
surprising that pioneering efforts in music advertising took root in the genre.
The authority of these publishers over theatres and repertoire, combined with
their involvement in mass communication and publishing more broadly, placed
them in a privileged and powerful position from which they could play a role in
the ways opera was represented and promoted within Italian culture. Through
marketing, these music publishers helped rescue opera from its perceived crisis;
and they contributed to the burgeoning process of distinction between elite
art and popular entertainment. Ricordi, in particular, took advantage of the
opportunities offered by advertising techniques and new technologies to enhance
the commercial value of operas and to promote the composers the company
represented.
A brief review of the history of the advertising techniques available in turn-
of-the-century Italy sheds light on the complex relationship between music
and market at a time when socio-economic and political developments made
marketing beneficial for opera. As noted above, the use of advertising increased
dramatically in the second half of the nineteenth century, in conjunction with
general economic and industrial progress and the consequent increase in the
production of consumer goods. In Italy, such developments were particularly
significant in the industrialized, wealthier northern regions of the peninsula. The
last decades of the century saw the creation of the first Italian industries, as well
as technological advances such as the first electrical plant (1883) and the Gotthard
railway tunnel through the Alps, connecting Italy and Switzerland (1882).
Technical innovations and industrialization, combined with the consequent
urbanization, opportunities for employment, country-to-town population
migration, and distribution of wealth, as well as a generalized ideal of national
9 Sonzogno founded and owned the daily newspaper Il secolo (which in the 1890s
had a circulation of 200,000 copies), managed the music journal Il trovatore
and owned the music periodical Il teatro illustrato (later Il teatro illustrato e la
musica popolare until 1892, when it merged with Il secolo). The firm also issued
periodicals for the general public and had substantial literary publishing activity.
See Silvia Valisa, ‘Casa Editrice Sonzogno: Mediazione culturale, circuiti del sapere
ed innovazione tecnologica nell’Italia unificata (1861–1900)’, The Printed Media
in Fin-de-siècle Italy: Publishers, Writers, and Readers, ed. Ann Hallamore Caesar,
Gabriella Romani and Jennifer Burns (Oxford: Legenda, 2011), pp. 90–106. From
the 1870s, Sonzogno also managed opera seasons throughout Italy, and in 1894, he
opened his own theatres, the Teatro Lirico Internazionale in Milan and the Teatro
Mercadante in Naples. See Baia Curioni, Mercanti dell’opera, p. 160. On Ricordi’s
journals, see n. 14 below.
fact, the Graphic Workshop trained or employed many men who would later
become the most famous graphic designers and illustrators in Italy and the major
exponents of Stile Liberty (Italian art nouveau): in addition to Hohenstein, they
included Leopoldo Metlicovitz (1868–1944), Marcello Dudovich (1878–1962),
Franz Laskoff (1869–1918/21), Achille Beltrame (1871–1945) and Leonetto Capiello
(1875–1942). All of these pioneers of Italian graphic art designed stage sets and
costumes (for opera and ballet), magazine covers, title pages for music scores
and opera librettos, illustrations for other musical products and, most famously,
posters.
Advertising La bohème
In a time of incipient mass culture, the ‘culture industry’ (‘Kulturindustrie’)17 of
turn-of-the-century Italy succeeded in developing highly advanced marketing
techniques to appeal to a widening consumer base. As Italian sociologist Fausto
Colombo has argued, Ricordi was at the centre of the new Italian culture
industry in its prominent use of the techniques and the tricks of advertising, its
mastery of the fine art of advertisement, and its contribution to the birth of an
advertising ‘image industry’ (‘l’industria dell’immagine’).18 My work draws on
and supplements Colombo’s claim by suggesting that Ricordi’s contribution was,
in addition, both influential for the history of Italian music and representative of
the new, inevitable intersection between commerce and art that characterized the
period. Ricordi’s ‘image industry’ was also indicative of the increasing role that
marketing played in the system of opera production. For various reasons, mostly
related to competitive marketing or a composer’s popularity and stature, Ricordi
organized small-scale publicity campaigns for several newly composed operas
produced between 1896 and circa 1906. Between 1906 and 1914, for the premieres
of some new operas and for new productions of some existing operas, the firm
might produce a new poster and, for selected works, might also prepare flyers,
postcards and mementos. To date, given the relative lack of detailed attention
to this aspect of the opera industry and the evidence I have thus far uncovered,
it appears that the only elaborate and comprehensive campaigns that Ricordi
organized in Italy were for three of Puccini’s operas – La bohème (premiere
advertising for other companies starting in 1896, see Cimorelli, Ginex et al., Storia
della comunicazione, pp. 35–44; Ferraris, ‘Graphics’, pp. 192–3; and Giorgio
Fioravanti, Leonardo Passarelli et al., La grafica in Italia (Milan: Leonardo Arte,
1997), p. 18.
17 The term was coined by Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, ‘Kulturindustrie:
Aufklärung als Massenbetrug’, Philosophische Fragmente: Dialektik der Aufklärung
(1944); trans. as ‘The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception’,
Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cumming (New York: Herder and Herder,
1972), pp. 120–67; it refers to the commercial marketing of culture, specifically
the branch that deals with the production of culture that is in opposition to true
culture.
18 Colombo, La cultura sottile, p. 89. By ‘image industry’ Colombo means the
production of images that themselves are the cultural product, instead of
illustrations accompanying another cultural product.
in 1896), Tosca (1900) and Madama Butterfly (1904) – Pietro Mascagni’s Iris
(1898), and Alberto Franchetti’s Germania (1902) and La figlia di Iorio (1906). In
addition to the general publicity for its operas, Ricordi often designed and printed
advertising material commissioned by opera houses for specific productions.
The campaign for La bohème seems to have been without precedent with
regard to its visual dimension. The publicity featuring images ranged across seven
different formats: large posters, playbills, postcards, envelope seals, porcelain
plates, periodicals (in particular the Gazzetta musicale) and the covers of musical
scores.19 The campaign’s iconography was centred on Hohenstein’s sketches
for the staging and costumes designed for the premiere. Characters in the same
outfits that could be seen on the opera stage were reproduced in almost all of the
publicity material. One is tempted to suggest that this reiteration of the imagery
of the staging may have been part of an integrated strategy for making La bohème
memorable and its composer iconic for the rebirth and the future of Italian opera.
The poster designed for La bohème was a decisive step forward for Italy
both in poster art and in the conception of publicity. Posters combined the
straightforward, informational format of playbills20 with illustrative techniques
of panorama and diorama, and with the efficacy and popular appeal of character
drawings. The first colour lithographic Italian poster, printed in 1863 for an Italian
production of Gounod’s Faust (which had its Italian premiere at the Teatro alla
Scala on 11 November 1862), may have been a prototype for those intended as
advertisements (rather than for announcements and notices).21 It was followed
twenty-six years later, in 1889, by Ricordi’s poster for Puccini’s first opera, Edgar.
(To date, no similar posters for the intervening period have come to light.) These
19 Although for other operas, this also included librettos, I have found no evidence
of a libretto for La bohème with the pictorial themes found in the other publicity
materials.
20 Playbills, widely used beginning in the seventeenth century, differ from posters
in their smaller size, denser text and relative lack of visually striking components
(imagery, if present, is simple and purely decorative in purpose). Their primary
purpose is to inform through words. Conversely, a poster’s purpose is to draw
attention first through dramatic graphic elements which also should convey
a message to the ‘reader’ and only secondarily through a supplemental verbal
message. See Harold Hutchinson, The Poster: An Illustrated History from 1860
(London: Studio Vista, 1968), p. 9; Ervine Metzl, The Poster: Its History and its Art
(New York: Watson-Guptill Publications, 1963), p. 18.
21 The poster was labelled ‘Lit[ography] Rossetti’ and dated ‘Milan, 18 November
1862’. It is reproduced in Max Gallo, The Poster in History (New York: W. W.
Norton & Company, 2002), p. 49, incorrectly labelled ‘A . Rossetti’; see also Mario
Monteverdi, La Scala: 400 Years of Stage Designs from the Museo Teatrale alla
Scala, Milan (London: International Exhibitions Foundation, 1971), pp. 14 and 77;
and Falabrino, Effimera e bella, p. 58. A variant of this poster was printed in Paris
in 1875 for a revival of the opera at the Académie Royale de Musique. It is possible
that the scene was based on sketches by Pierre-Auguste Lamy, who provided set
designs for the opera’s premiere in 1859 at the Théâtre Lyrique. Monteverdi (La
Scala, p. 14) mentions the possibility that this was a prototype; Falabrino (Effimera
e bella, p. 58) labels it the first, although no other source confirms that.
posters still relied heavily on the format of the playbill and replicated the layout
of covers for sheet music and piano-vocal scores: the lettering, centred visually,
carried most of the information, and any imagery served simply as decoration
around the text. Although the poster for Edgar evinced an incisive choice of
imagery and colours, to communicate basic information it relied almost solely
on words, which occupied most of the space. With the posters designed by
Hohenstein for Verdi’s Falstaff in 1893 and for Puccini’s La bohème in 1895, images
acquired greater significance, occupying more surface space and ‘interacting’ with
the lettering (see below), which was superimposed on the image instead of being
below or next to it as in the Faust and Edgar posters respectively. Henceforth, the
titles of the operas became typographically more elaborate, acquiring a pictorial
aspect that complements the style of the image.
Poster design is founded on immediacy of communication and on the
suggestive value of the visual elements. The poster for La bohème (Fig. 2.1) was
the first Italian manifestation of these concepts, achieved using models developed
in France. Poster art had begun there in the 1850s, with artists such as Jules
Chéret, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec and Alfons Mucha, who were interested in
new forms of democratic artistic communication. Developments in photographic
techniques also affected poster design, particularly in the way images were
framed. The style most widely used for the Italian posters of the period under
consideration here was, as for other European posters of the time, Stile Liberty, i.e.
Art Nouveau in France (Jugendstil in Germany).22
The poster for La bohème was inspired by Chéret’s and Toulouse-Lautrec’s
work and was constructed around a visually captivating interplay of text and
image. It was printed in colour (predominantly deep reds, taupes and greens) and
in various sizes, the largest being 102 × 67 cm; and it used, for the opera’s title, a
font that was somewhat ornate yet large and simple enough to be read from a
distance, demonstrating that Ricordi’s Poster Design and Printing Department
was beginning to understand the poster concept – in the modern sense. It also
used a plain font, printed in varying sizes, to convey information about the work
(‘quattro quadri’ [four scenes]), the librettists (‘G[iuseppe] Giacosa e L[uigi] Illica’),
the composer (‘G. Puccini’) and the publisher (‘G. Ricordi & C editori’), but it
lacked details about performances – such as dates and venues – which one would
expect to find on a poster today. The name of the author of the opera’s source,
‘Henry [sic Henri] Murger’, also appears, in a banner embedded in a decorative
band in the upper portion of the poster. The information on the poster was
generic owing to economic considerations: the poster could thus have been used
for multiple productions, and its design could have been adapted for various
purposes. Sketches of the opera’s characters emerge from an imaginary space
‘behind’ the poster, climb over the decorative band at the top, cascade between
the words ‘La’ and ‘bohème’ and almost dreamily proceed, one after the other,
towards the bottom of the poster, displaying relationships that define them in
the opera. There are, starting from the bottom of the poster, Mimì and Rodolfo
in a romantic embrace in their Act I costumes; then the painter Marcello and the
22 Hutchinson, The Poster, pp. 14–25; Metzl, The Poster, p. 37; Roger Sainton, Art
Nouveau: Posters & Graphics (New York: Rizzoli, 1977).
Figure
2.1 Ricordi’s poster for La bohème, designed by Adolf Hohenstein, 1895,
chromolithography, Inv. N. 13400, Treviso, Collezione Salce [Courtesy of MiBACT,
Soprintendenza BAEP, for the provinces of Venice, Belluno, Padua and Treviso]
23 The opera was not performed in Milan, the city where most of the readers of the
GMM resided, until March 1897.
24 The 13 February announcement was accompanied by three sketches from Act II:
the ‘Venditore di immagine’, ‘Un borghese’ and ‘Studente’. This issue also
announced a special treat: ‘Readers will certainly appreciate the musical novelty
that we offer in this issue. It is a selection from Puccini’s triumphant La bohème,
Musetta’s Waltz (‘Quando me’n vò soletta per la via’) from the opera’s second
act, a number already destined to be popular because of its graceful, flowing and
immediately effective melody.’
25 GMM, 13 February 1896, p. 3. The special advertisement was for the piano-vocal
score, the piano score and the libretto, and it reported the prices for each at 15, 8
and 1 francs/lire, respectively.
Figure 2.2
Cover of the
Gazzetta musicale
di Milano, 13
February 1896,
Mimì’s Act I
costume, designed
by Hohenstein
26 The reverse of the cards sometimes contained an advertisement for the publisher
or for an opera house and its season.
Figure 2.3 One of the series of postcards Ricordi printed for La bohème, Mimì and Rodolfo, Act I
[Courtesy of Civica Raccolta delle Stampe Achille Bertarelli, Castello Sforzesco, Milan]
and authenticity to the cards. Alterocca’s cards also often carry a facsimile of
Puccini’s signature.
33 Aldo Maggiori, in the October 1899 issue of Emporium: Rivista mensile illustrata
d’arte letteratura scienze e varietà, attributed the design of the postcards to
Hohenstein’s protégé Metlicovitz; cited in Ferraris, ‘Graphics’, p. 194. All of the
postcards can be seen at http://www.historicopera.com/xitalian/hohenstein-
boheme.htm [accessed 21 February 2015].
Figure 2.4
Ricordi’s envelope seal, Mimì
[from Eufremio Malorzo,
Catalogo degli erinnofili
italiani, Turin: Edizioni
Digitalis, 2006, p. 15]
of music from the opera, which were sold in Ricordi’s shops in Italy and by his
representatives internationally. Although, despite extensive searching, I have
found only one exemplar of an envelope seal (Fig. 2.4), it is possible that there was
a series of these as well. Judging from the Mimì example, each seal would have
reproduced a single character figure, labelled with the opera’s title, as well as the
names of the composer and his librettists.34 They were probably sold in Ricordi’s
shops. The porcelain dinner plates, small plates, and bowls were manufactured
by the renowned Società Ceramica Richard-Ginori and sold in sets of six. They
were handmade and hand-painted with selected scenes similar to those on the
postcards or with pairs of characters as depicted on the poster. Considering the
cost and prestige of Richard-Ginori’s products, it seems likely that only a few
sets of these wares would have been produced and for a limited consumer base,
perhaps even at a specific client’s request.35
Ricordi also used imagery based on the set and costume sketches for the
covers of piano-vocal scores, excerpts, transcriptions and arrangements of the
music of La bohème. Many vocal scores issued for foreign markets (German,
French and English), printed in 1897, reproduced a scene reminiscent of Act III
with Mimì and Rodolfo in the foreground and Marcello and Musetta in the
background among the snowy trees and benches that were part of Hohenstein’s
Figure 2.5 (a, left ) Cover of The Bohemians, An Opera in Four Acts […] Composed by G. Puccini
(New York: Boosey & Co., 1897) [Courtesy of Brown University Library]; (b, right) Cover of La
Bohème di G. Puccini – Impressioni di C. Graziani Walter, op. 250, for two mandolins, mandola
and guitar, pl. no. 100026 (Milan: G. Ricordi & Co., 1911) [Courtesy of Civica Raccolta delle Stampe
Achille Bertarelli, Castello Sforzesco, Milan]
set design for this act (Fig. 2.5a). Various excerpts and transcriptions, printed in
1904 and 1911 (and probably other years), featured Mimì in her Act I costume in
shades of blue, holding her candle (Fig. 2.5b). In 1911, Ricordi also printed a cover
with a collage of the main characters in costumes designed by Hohenstein for
various acts, for Corazzata Sicilia: Marcia d’Ordinanza dall’Opera La Bohème
di G. Puccini.36 Although I have found no evidence of specially decorated scores
published before 1904 for the Italian market, that does not necessarily mean
that they were not printed. In company correspondence, Giulio and Tito Ricordi
commented regularly on how the appearance of covers reflected the cachet of an
edition; Tito’s comments to Giulio about ‘luxury’ versions and covers/title pages
that were ‘plain’ or ‘elegant’ suggest that there were various cover designs, some
of which doubtless would have reproduced the same imagery as in the publicity
materials.37 Ricordi continued to use imagery drawn from Hohenstein’s sketches
in various ways for music covers until recently.
36 ‘Riduzione per pianoforte di Carmelo Bizzozero’, new edn, pl. no, 100934 (Milan:
Ricordi, 1911); reproduced in Sartori, Casa Ricordi, appendix Tav. XVII.
37 Letter of 6 October 1894, vol. 6, no. 168, copialettere for fiscal year 1894/5, I-Mb,
ASR. Another letter, from Giulio Ricordi to the Administration of the Graphic
Workshop, dated 30 March 1897, vol. 18, no. 148, copialettere for fiscal year 1896/7,
I-Mb, ASR, mentions luxury editions and elaborate covers for other operas.
38 Other operas for which Ricordi prepared an extensive publicity campaign do not
present the same consistency of imagery. Two very different posters were made for
Madama Butterfly, and the imagery for the well-known Tosca poster (Tosca with
Scarpia’s body) was not repeated on the postcards, which have a very different
style. The poster for Mascagni’s Iris is colourful and depicts a woman running
across a field, while the postcard series reproduces scenes from the opera, and the
covers of the librettos and scores are decorated simply with iris flowers. On the
function of the iconography for La bohème, see Colombo, La cultura sottile, p. 88.
39 Ibid.
40 Ricordi’s designs for La bohème’s advertisements and sets are now reproduced on
various types of mementos, such as magnets, bags, notebooks, T-shirts and so on,
which can be purchased in Italy. Ricordi recently reprinted the La bohème poster,
along with those for other Puccini operas. The original designs for the postcards
have not survived (Ferraris, ‘Graphics’, p. 195), so today the original postcards are
highly valuable collectors’ items.
opera, and Ricordi chose those sketches that highlighted the intimate, localized
atmosphere of the group of friends and their environs in Paris.
Ricordi’s ability to assemble an imaginary and to keep Puccini’s name in the
limelight allowed this campaign to assist in the construction of a cultural and
musical icon. Modern-day scholars have often referred to Puccini having been
‘constructed’ or ‘created’ as a great master. Baia Curioni defines ‘the “creation”
of the genius’ as ‘the constant work of accompaniment, support, stimulus
and guidance by Giulio Ricordi to the benefit of Puccini’, while Alexandra
Wilson calls it, more powerfully, ‘inventing an Italian composer’ and ‘making
a maestro’, emphasizing ‘the weight lent to him by his publishing house’. 41
Ricordi’s promotional campaigns – not only for La bohème but also for Tosca
and Madama Butterfly – were only one aspect of the ‘construction’ of Puccini
as an icon. Ricordi also curated Puccini’s career and image in a way similar to
that of a modern agent or public-relations and press office. Moreover, surviving
correspondence shows that Giulio and Tito Ricordi dedicated special attention
to Puccini, helping him find suitable librettos, motivating him, assisting with
the production of his operas and organizing interviews with the press.42 As we
learned at the beginning of this essay, Catalani feared for his future as a composer
on Ricordi’s roster; in a subsequent letter, he complained further: Ricordi ‘doesn’t
want to hear talk of anyone but Puccini […] if he helps me somewhat, he does
a hundred times that for Puccini’. 43 Catalani may have been exaggerating the
magnitude of the problem, but the stature of the Ricordi firm in the music
world gave the publisher power to influence – according to his desires and
interests – how an opera house shaped its season. In a letter to Puccini, Giulio
Ricordi remarked that he had ‘promoted La bohème’ and that his efforts had
cost ‘considerable material (and for [him personally] also moral) sacrifices’. 44
(Part of the motivation behind such strong publicity was competition from the
composer Ruggero Leoncavallo, who, simultaneously with Puccini, was writing
an opera on the same subject and with the same title for rival music publisher
Sonzogno.)45 Ricordi’s use of diplomacy, creativity and technology (not only for
41 Baia Curioni, Mercanti dell’opera, p. 177; and Wilson, The Puccini Problem, pp. 11,
25 and 23, respectively.
42 For more details about the personal involvement of Ricordi in the professional
development of Puccini and the productions of Puccini’s operas, see Baia Curioni,
Mercanti dell’opera, pp. 168–80; and Wilson, The Puccini Problem, pp. 34–9.
Most publications on Puccini mention the composer’s close relationship with the
Ricordi family, but they do not explore it from a marketing perspective.
43 Alfredo Catalani, letter of 1 June 1892 to Giuseppe Depanis, in Richard M. Berrong,
The Politics of Opera in Turn-of-the-Century Italy: As Seen through the Letters of
Alfredo Catalani (Lewiston, NY: Edward Mellen, 1992), p. 106.
44 ‘Ma ora che, con ingenti sacrifici materiali (e per me anche morali) si è data la
spinta alla Bohème, bisogna subirne le conseguenze’, in reference to Puccini’s
refusal to go abroad for a staging of La bohème; letter from Giulio Ricordi to
Puccini, 1 June 1897, vol. 28, no. 22, copialettere of fiscal year 1896/7, I-Mb, ASR.
45 Leoncavallo’s opera had its premiere at the Teatro la Fenice in Venice on 6 May
1897.
publicity, but also in staging, casting and so on) seems to have contributed to La
bohème’s immediate success and its enduring place in the repertoire, and to have
helped create a perception of Puccini as the long-awaited and much hoped for
successor to Verdi. The power and the effectiveness of the dissemination of the
idea of Puccini as icon are perhaps best attested by the enduring presence of the
composer’s works on the stages of the world today.
Conclusions
Catalani was not the only one to view the marketing of opera negatively. Some
intellectuals and critics condemned marketing’s influence as detrimental to
the artistic progress of the nation and to the quality of opera programming. A
commentator in one early ‘scholarly’ Italian music journal, Rivista musicale
italiana, decried these commercial practices, insisting that music publishers,
through base marketing techniques, actually ‘imposed’ a repertoire on the
audience according to a ‘recipe for success’ and not according to aesthetic
principles, thus turning operatic theatre into a commercial enterprise.46 The
well-known critic Leone Fortis, writing in Ricordi’s Gazzetta musicale, blamed
publicity for the death of critical thought, because it created expectations, both
positive and negative, for audiences and thus conditioned the reception of a work
or a performance.47 The practices of advertising within the music world drew
disapproval from many towards the end of the nineteenth century: in 1883, a critic
for Il teatro illustrato complained that the practice of putting advertisements on
theatre curtains was ‘horrible’;48 the 1900 edition of Petrocchi’s Nuovo dizionario
universale della lingua italiana defined ‘advertisement’ as ‘a notice, often
quackish, to attract people’s attention to commercial things, to make a name for
oneself ’;49 and in 1909, one journalist labelled advertising an ‘aberration’.50
Slowly, however, advertising practices acquired artistic standing, as
collaborations with great artists, application of international artistic developments,
46 Giovanni Ferrero, ‘Crisi teatrale: Appunti sul Teatro Regio di Torino’, Rivista
musicale italiana 6 (1899), 604–34, at p. 608.
47 Leone Fortis, ‘La critica e i critici’, GMM, 24 June 1891, p. 383.
48 Vincenzo Valle, ‘I sipari réclame dei teatri’, Il teatro illustrato, 31 July 1883, p. 110,
observed that it was a widespread custom to decorate theatre curtains with
advertisements. The practice was especially common at the Milanese Teatro
dal Verme. Valle also reported that other periodicals too had complained about
such practices and had suggested that audiences rebel against such ‘profit-driven
invasions in the temples of the gentle art’, which distract from music and are
‘anti-artistic’.
49 Policarpo Petrocchi, Nuovo dizionario universale della lingua italiana (Milan:
Fratelli Treves, 1900); cited in Colombo, La cultura sottile, p. 84. See also
Abruzzese and Colombo, Dizionario, p. 381.
50 In a 1909 article in the graphic arts professional magazine Emporium, advertising
was still defined as an ‘aberration’ that ‘offends aesthetic principles and wears
down patience’; quoted in Fioravanti, Passarelli et al., La grafica in Italia, p. 7.
and the longlasting branding power of graphic designs dignified their status.51
Ricordi contributed to increasing the aesthetic value of such advertisements by
creating beautiful, high-quality artefacts. In contrast, it was becoming increasingly
difficult for some people to reconcile advertising with cultural products. Some
intellectuals identified successful, crowd-pleasing operas as lacking artistic and
cultural value.52 In the case of La bohème, its commercial success was viewed as
negatively as the main reason for that success, i.e. its ‘atmosphere’. One writer for
Fanfulla della domenica noted regarding La bohème: ‘Opera should not simply
depict atmosphere; it should represent man’s strongest affections, like love, hate
and jealousy, not the insignificant psychological expressions of everyday life.’53 As
I have described above, it was precisely the atmosphere of daily life that was at
the centre of the publicity. Although Ricordi’s campaign most likely contributed
to La bohème’s longlasting commercial success and popularity, it may also have
contributed to intellectuals’ negative reception of Puccini.
51 The attention to the development of the graphic arts is attested by the 1894
Esposizioni Riunite in Milan, which for the first time included a section for graphic
design, and the 1899 Esposizione Artistica di Reclame in Genoa (Valeri, Pubblicità
italiana, p. 32). Boccioni, Fortunato Depero, Dudovich and Sironi are some of the
famous names of ‘high’ art who worked in early advertisement.
52 The negative connotation of ‘commercial’ – as used by the critic for Rivista
musicale italiana, mentioned above – relates to the ongoing shift in the role of
opera from entertainment to art, the hierarchical distinctions of genres and venues,
issues of public funding and educational purpose for theatre, and modernist
distance between artists and masses, and therefore it would be too complex to
be tackled here. However, it is useful to mention such matters to contextualize
the accusations of vulgarity and crowd-pleasing that were directed towards La
bohème and that remain partially attached to Puccini’s commercial success to
this day. As Wilson points out (The Puccini Problem, pp. 4 and 108, respectively),
‘contemporary intellectuals opposed Puccini’s music as the embodiment of the
vulgar, “feminized” bourgeois culture’ represented by Giolitti, and Puccini’s operas
as ‘mass produced commodities’.
53 ‘Diapason’, Fanfulla della domenica, 9 February 1896; cited from the translation in
Wilson, The Puccini Problem, p. 44.
When the present writer was in his teens, the price of music was more than
twenty times what it now is. The first guinea that he recollects having been
given to him, in 1837, was expended in a pianoforte score of The Messiah
which is now published at a shilling.
George Grove, 18871
J ames Raven concludes his historical survey of the cultural, social and
commercial development of the English book trade by stating, ‘For many it is
no longer sufficient to study literature without considering larger publishing
strategies, professional networks, and the manner in which booksellers put the
work of writers into print and created a literary market.’2 Raven argues that the
factors which determine a book’s availability (i.e. the motivation of the publisher)
and its acquisition (i.e. the motivation of the purchaser and/or reader) cast their
own interpretative light on the way these texts were consumed and received
by those who encountered them. Raven’s historiography of books and other
printed sources has considerable relevance for the distribution and acquisition of
music’s materials.3 The present chapter focuses on aspects of the output of the
London music publisher Novello in the late nineteenth century, using the case
of the composer John Stainer and his oratorio The Crucifixion, to illustrate how
a strategic approach to culture and commerce could be calculated to profitable
effect by composer and publisher alike.
60
4 The firm’s history is set down by Cooper, The House of Novello; and Michael Hurd,
Vincent Novello – and Company (London: Granada, 1981).
5 Although there are several histories of individual choral societies, there has been
little work done on the choral society as a social and musical movement. Russell
discusses the issues in his Popular Music, pp. 248–71. For individual societies,
see George F. Sewell, A History of the Bradford Festival Choral Society: From
its Formation in 1856 to its Jubilee in 1906 (Bradford: G. F. Sewell, 1907); R. A.
Edwards, And the Glory: A History in Commemoration of the 150th Anniversary
of the Huddersfield Choral Society (Leeds: Maney, 1985). I offer a wider context in
my ‘Music and Musical Performance: Histories in Disjunction?’, The Cambridge
History of Musical Performance, ed. Colin Lawson and Robin Stowell (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 169–206. For a fascinating perspective on
was included in the ‘payment by results’ system, meaning that a bonus was
paid to those publicly funded elementary schools whose classes demonstrated
proficiency in the singing of songs at the annual inspection.6 Songs featuring
patriotic and historical themes were a staple of school singing classes, and
these were encouraged as a way of inculcating a sense of national and historical
identity.7 All this helped to create a market for school songs, both at the
elementary and at the secondary level of the private British (‘public’) schools
favoured by the higher social classes, as well as in the grammar schools catering
for the expansion in numbers of middle-class children. Added to this was a
growing demand for musical primers and methods to support instrumental and
vocal teaching, together with theory and harmony.8 An obvious consequence
of this proliferation of those involved in choral societies, Anglican church
choirs, schools and the learning of music was the opportunity for volume sales
of printed material, and Novello set about realizing the commercial potential of
this situation by developing the strength and size of its catalogue in each of these
fields.
In Victorian Britain, a music publisher’s income essentially came from the
revenue generated by the sales of printed material. Optimally, a publisher’s
catalogue would consist of a mixture of strong and steadily selling works; the
income from these would enable the investment involved in new publications
while also covering the costs of market failures. The revenue streams from
performance, recording and broadcasting rights which would transform the
economics of music publishing still lay well into the future, certainly as far as
Britain was concerned. The situation in France was very different. The performing
right on musical works had been levied by the collecting society, SACEM (Société
des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Éditeurs de Musique), since 1851. In 1880, SACEM
established a London agent to collect fees on performances of its members’ works.
But even when the British collection agency, the Performing Right Society, was
formed in 1914, the major publishers, including Boosey and Novello, delayed
joining it: Boosey did so in 1926, and Novello only as late as 1936. The need to
provincial musical life, see Reginald Nettel, Music in the Five Towns, 1840–1914
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1944).
6 Bernarr Rainbow and Gordon Cox, Music in Educational Thought and Practice
(Woodbridge: Boydell, 2006), p. 233. Elementary education was made compulsory
in England following the 1870 Elementary Education Act, which introduced
secular elementary schools administered by local-government-appointed School
Boards and financed though the rates. Previously much elementary education had
been undertaken by local church schools.
7 As exemplified by Charles Stanford’s editing of A Song Book for Schools (1884), a
‘graduated collection’ of sixty-four unison, two- and three-part songs which was
also set in Tonic Sol-fa notation by William McNaught. This was the precursor of
the famous The National Song Book (1906), ‘a complete collection of the folk songs,
carols and rounds suggested by the Board of Education’ (in other words it carried
the seal of official approval), also edited by Stanford and published by Boosey.
8 For an interesting overview, see David Golby, Instrumental Teaching in Nineteenth-
Century Britain (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).
focus on the revenue from sheet-music sales had a determining effect on the
musical economics of the time, shaping the nature of nineteenth- and early-
twentieth-century British composition, as will be discussed later in more detail.
The adage ‘fine words butter no parsnips’ has relevance for this musical situation:
the most favourable of high-minded critical responses to a piece of music
could not influence its value as a commercial proposition unless it translated
directly into sales. Therefore, before the era of collecting fees from broadcasting,
recording and performance, the British publisher depended upon the market for
oratorios, church and popular music because these were the genres that held the
potential for volume sales. By contrast, income from sales of serious orchestral
music was at such a low level that rarely might a publisher expect to recoup the
costs of printing-up scores and performance materials.
Novello, along with other British music publishers, worked on the basis that
its financial interest in its publications was protected under the 1842 Copyright
Act and that the purchase of sheet music conferred the right of performance
without any further payment. Thus the only secondary income from a work came
through the hire of additional performance materials, such as orchestral parts.
The Musical Copyright Act of 1882 made it possible for the copyright holder to
reserve the right to a work’s public performance – and effectively to charge for
granting permission – by stating so on the title page. However, this was not a
development that British music publishers welcomed because their market model
was to maximize sheet-music sales and so to place no constraint whatsoever
on performances. This meant that a composer’s income from published works
could come only from selling the copyright directly to the publisher, through the
publisher making royalty payments on copies sold, or by some combination of
these practices. The sales expectations of a composer would vary according to the
music’s idiom or genre. One publisher working in the ballad market defined a ‘hit’
in terms of sales of 200,000 copies and above.9 If that figure was truly indicative,
then the sales and print runs of some of Novello’s church anthems and oratorios
show that such exuberance was not solely the preserve of the popular ballad
market, as it has previously been assumed.
Novello’s success in the domains of the choral society, the Anglican church
choir and the educational sphere came by the assemblage of a substantial
catalogue for each, followed by effective marketing and dissemination. The
firm’s commercial domination in all of these areas gave it a considerable de
facto influence over British musical taste, because the reputation of Novello’s
publications shaped what was generally esteemed, bought and performed. And
because these particular amateur markets were so significant for the economic
livelihood of most British composers, the type of music that Novello chose to
publish prompted what many of them wrote. As we shall see, Novello Archive
evidence points to the symbiosis between Novello’s business success and a
particular type of British musical life, which, in turn, had a determining effect
upon a great deal of compositional activity.
9 Frederick Day, managing director of Francis, Day and Hunter Ltd, quoted in Alan
Peacock and Ronald Weir, The Composer in the Market Place (London: Faber &
Faber, 1975), p. 42.
10 In eulogistic mode, the author of A Short History of Cheap Music [Joseph Bennett]
wrote (p. 142): ‘English music itself owes a debt of gratitude to the house of
Novello, as the position it has now gained would have been retarded many years
had it not been for [Novello’s] efforts.’ But what Bennett was referring to was
being generated by the amateur, participative market of church choirs and choral
societies. The production of symphonic and serious orchestral music in Britain
suffered because of the commercial emphasis on choral music. Before the advent
of recording/broadcasting/performing right income, such orchestral genres earned
pitifully small amounts for two reasons. First, British audiences preferred concerts
of orchestral works by Continental composers (concerts featuring British music
were not well patronized); and, second, this lack of concert take-up meant that
performance materials and scores sold hardly at all, and so the costs of production
were most unlikely to be recouped.
11 In fact, these amateur music markets continued to be important revenue earners
for Novello until the fracturing of the traditional patterns of much of British social
and musical life in the 1960s. The shift in the economics of music publishing away
from dependence on the sale of printed materials happened when publishers
recognized the revenue potential of the royalty income streams (Performing Right,
Mechanical Right and Broadcasting fees) invested in the music they published.
This complicated history is set out in Peacock and Weir, The Composer in the
Market Place, and Cyril Ehrlich, Harmonious Alliance: A History of the Performing
Right Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
12 Frank Trentman, Free Trade Nation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 2.
13 MT, February 1871, p. 798.
forty-nine of these anthems having a print run of fewer than 10,000 copies
each. Stainer’s ‘What are these’ had the largest printing, of 329,000 copies – a
number that would certainly make it a ‘hit’ in popular-music terms.14 Table 3.1
(see Appendix, p. 82) shows the contemporary popularity of Stainer’s anthems
in relation to those of other composers. These enormous (and economical)
print runs were made feasible by the new print technology of stereotyping.
Stereotyping, as its name suggests, enables multiple plates to be created from one
forme of type; it was the key to producing music cheaply.15 But the success of the
Novello operation also relied upon the highest possible utilization of its printing
works. Owning and operating its own London printing plant (deliberately
manned by non-union labour) enabled Novello to take in contract printing and
finishing for other publishers to fill any production slack. Such efficiencies helped
push down the unit costs of the firm’s own publications.
Novello realized that commercial success also came from stirring up demand.
Selling oratorios by canonical composers such as Handel was relatively easy
because the name on the title page did the marketing. What really gave Novello’s
vocal scores the commercial edge over rivals was their practicality. They were
downright user-friendly: clearly printed, their octavo format made them
handleable, they employed only treble and bass clefs (no challenging C clefs) and
they had the additional convenience of accompaniments arranged for piano –
ideal also for domestic music-making. This winning combination of affordability,
readability and general musical convenience made Novello’s vocal scores the
staple commodity of choral societies the length and breadth of the country. But
Novello had to generate purchasers for the contemporary compositions it was
publishing in such vast numbers. It used its monthly publication, the Musical
Times, to communicate directly with a gamut of potential consumers, influencing
opinion and shaping musical taste by means of its editorials, reviews and
‘pushing’ of Novello publications.16 The Musical Times’s advertising enfolded the
magazine’s editorial content, and these extensive front and back sections remain
an invaluable source of knowledge about contemporary repertoire, attitudes and
employment opportunities. In addition, each issue of the Musical Times included
a free sample of a Novello publication presented as a musical supplement. The
17 See Percy Scholes, The Mirror of Music, 1844–1944: A Century of Musical Life in
Britain as Reflected in the Pages of the ‘Musical Times’, 2 vols (London: Novello
and Oxford University Press, 1947).
18 For an explanation and the comparators used, see Lawrence H. Officer and
Samuel H. Williamson, ‘Five Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a UK Pound
Amount, 1270 to Present’, MeasuringWorth, 2014; http://www.measuringworth.
com/ukcompare [accessed 15 March 2014]. All subsequent conversions to today’s
monetary value are calculated from this website.
19 The contracts are transcribed in Cooper, The House of Novello, Appendices 1 & 2.
20 British Library, London [hereafter GB-Lbl], Add. MS 69595.
21 Hurd, Vincent Novello, p. 70.
22 Novello and Company Business Archive, Financial and printing records of the
music publishers Novello and Co. and associated companies; 1809–c. 1976,
GB-Lbl, Add. MS 69516–69792; for a summary description of the Archive, see
Chris Banks, ‘The Music Publisher as a Research Source’, Information Sources in
context. We discover the Novello repertoire that people were actually purchasing,
and in what quantities; we learn how many copies of a work were being printed in
anticipation of demand; and we see how much composers were paid. The Novello
Archive is treasure on an enormous scale, but presents some difficulties in its use
and interpretation.23 The information it contains was gathered departmentally,
and consequently there are duplications and inconsistencies that are typical of
such working documents. At the core of the Archive are the Commission Books,
a sequence of royalty payments and sales from 1840 to 1974. The Commission
Books (laid out in column format) record the contracted terms and business
statistics for each publication: the retail price, composer’s royalty and any special
payment terms; total sales and complimentary copies for each accounting period;
the royalties earned and the stock availability.
The evidence of the Novello archive thus offers a corrective to the usual
portrayal of nineteenth-century British music.24 Before the emergence of more
revisionist treatments of this repertoire,25 standard musicological representations
of the Victorian and Edwardian situation had conveyed musical scarcity and
cultural impoverishment. These had overlooked the vitality of the British music
market, in which composers were catering to the demands of enthusiastic
amateurs. Instead, they constructed a sad monody, lamenting the dearth
of symphonic or heavyweight concert repertoire from all but a few British
composers. Typical was Frank Howes’s declaration that ‘Church music and the
music of sociability […] play a small part in social history but no part in our
Music, ed. Lewis Foreman (Munich: K. G. Saur, 2003), pp. 302–24, here Appendix,
pp. 312–24.
23 John Drysdale, Elgar’s Earnings (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2013) came to me for
review while I was completing my research for this chapter. My focus was on
Novello’s strategy during Stainer’s time with the firm as revealed by the production,
sales and financial records for Novello’s Primers, choral-society and church-music
publications generally, for Stainer himself but also for a wider range of individuals
such as A. R. Gaul, Sterndale Bennett, Coleridge-Taylor, Parry and Stanford. It
was therefore interesting to read Drysdale’s contextualizing of Novello’s business
history and to discover that his interpretation of the Novello operation essentially
matched my own conclusions. As Drysdale’s detailed financial analyses show,
Elgar’s and Stainer’s experiences were very different – not least because Stainer
did not stray beyond Novello’s favoured publishing genres.
24 However, Judith Blezzard cautions that the very easily accessible information about
Novello’s publishing output in the Musical Times has made for too Novello-centric
a view of late-nineteenth-century publications. She offers a corrective in ‘What
Choirs Also Sang: Aspects of Provincial Music Publishing in Late-Nineteenth-
Century England’, The Business of Music, ed. Michael Talbot (Liverpool: Liverpool
University Press, 2002), pp. 62–95. A snapshot of the many late-nineteenth-
century British music publishers and the diversity of what they were issuing is
given by The Music Publishers’ Association ‘Catalogue’, a summary list of British
publications, included in MT (1884), 113–19, 305–11, 488–95, and 665–71.
25 For example, The Athlone History of Music in Britain, vol. 5: The Romantic Age,
1800–1914, ed. Nicholas Temperley (London: Athlone, 1981).
recent musical history’. 26 Yet the Novello Business Archive shows the enormous
significance church and choral music played in shaping the actuality of British
musical life. Before fees from broadcasting and performance, or the public
subsidy of the arts (which began during the Second World War), and absent a
patron or financial self-sufficiency, the majority of composers wrote directly for
the musical market which in Britain effectively meant the amateur market. And
in the areas of British musical life offering the best chance of volume sales – i.e.
providing music for choral societies and churches, and materials for educational
purposes (as opposed to the more speculative field and elusive successes of the
popular music spheres) – it was Novello publications that dominated.
With this sort of clout, Novello was, understandably, the publisher of choice
for many British composers and its market dominance put it in an extremely
powerful position to dictate to its composers.27 It was therefore all the more
unfortunate that key aspects of Novello’s commercial strategy worked directly
against them. The firm’s position was that, having bought the music, its customers
were entitled to perform their Novello purchases as and when they liked,
without further fee. Accordingly, the company saw charging performing right
fees as a strong disincentive to sales of print music to the amateur market and
thus did not welcome the opportunity to do so.28 On the eve of the 1882 Musical
Copyright Act (which enabled the copyright holder to reserve the right of public
performance by stating so on the title page), the Musical Opinion reported the
publisher John Boosey’s contention that by purchasing the printed work one
‘purchases the performing rights automatically’, even though that was not going to
be the exact legal position, thus making it very clear where the publishers stood.29
Indeed, because of the sensitivities about levying performing right fees in any of
its key amateur markets, and to prevent any of its composers from undermining
its position by attempting to do so, Novello changed its standard publishing
contract so that the performing right for a work was automatically assigned
to the firm. Thus when buying the copyright to Stainer’s oratorio St Mary
Magdalen (1883), Novello stipulated in the contract that doing so represented its
‘absolute purchase of the copyright and right of publication, representation and
performance and all other rights’. In this way, Novello prevented the performing
26 Frank Howes, The English Musical Renaissance (London: Secker & Warburg, 1966),
p. 23.
27 As Krummel described London’s publishing situation: ‘Novello favoured serious
music while Chappell favoured popular music, especially after 1850; Augener
and Boosey, Metzler and Cramer had something of a mixture in their catalogues.’
D. W. Krummel, ‘Music Publishing’, The Romantic Age, 1800–1914, ed. Nicholas
Temperley, pp. 46–59, at p. 58; for names of other Victorian music publishers,
see D. W. Krummel and Stanley Sadie, eds, Music Printing and Publishing
(Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990), p. 120.
28 Under the Musical Copyright Act of 1882: see Thomas Edward Scrutton, The
Law of Copyright, 4th edn (London: Clowes, 1903), pp. 99–100; see also Ehrlich,
Harmonious Alliance, pp. 1–21; and Drysdale, Elgar’s Earnings, pp. 42–9.
29 James Coover, Music Publishing, Copyright and Piracy in Victorian England
(London: Mansell, 1985), p. 12.
right from being asserted by the composer, so ensuring the situation for the
amateur consumer/performer remained unchanged.30
Novello’s position over performance rights represented a significant obstacle
to serious orchestral composition. Effectively, it confined the earning potential of
this type of music in Britain to the sale or hire of what was typically a minuscule
number of scores and sets of orchestral parts – the antithesis of the fruitful vocal-
score market. We can better appreciate the financial contradictions of these two
British musical markets by contrasting their respective compositional economics.
By 1887, the Novello catalogue had some 10,550 choral works in octavo format,
retailing at between 1d and 4s, and 10,236 publications remaining in the
old-fashioned folio format.31 But its catalogue of serious contemporary British
orchestral compositions was meagre, with fewer than fifty works available in full
score. It is revealing that Bennett’s A Short History of Cheap Music approvingly
describes this tally as ‘a very large number of works […] a list unprecedented in
the annals of publishing in England’.32 Yet this was paucity compared with what
was being issued by continental European publishing houses.33 The imbalance
between the choral and the orchestral persisted, a clear indication that Novello
saw the field of serious orchestral music more as a nuisance than as a viable,
let alone a money-making, enterprise. For, twenty-five years later, in 1912, the
Novello Catalogue had a section headed ‘Orchestral works by British composers’
which lists 200 works, only ninety-nine of which have full scores printed up
for sale.34 Of these, only nine symphonic compositions were on sale in printed
full-score format, plus three in manuscript that were available for hire. Further
evidence of the dearth of published British symphonies comes in the listing of
only twelve British symphonies in a 1902 compendium of orchestral music.35 In
terms of the British musical public’s taste, it is revealing that Novello published
a larger number of symphonies by Continental composers, such as Mendelssohn
and Dvořák, for which there was evidently greater enthusiasm. In fact, Novello’s
British orchestral catalogue consisted mainly of a variety of lighter suites and
edition), sold nearly 35,000 copies from 1884 to 1888, earning Dr Monks over
£1,000.41 The Commission Books record a profusion of canticle settings for the
Anglican services of Evensong, Matins and Holy Communion; Magnificat and
Nunc Dimittis settings were especially popular.42 Most canticles from this time
are long forgotten despite their original popularity, as, for example, the Evening
Service in F by a Norwich organist, Edward Bunnett (1834–1923). Bunnett
enjoyed a strong local reputation as conductor of the Norwich Musical Union
(1872) and Borough Organist (1880), and this Evening Service (retailing at 3d) sold
158,089 copies between 1878 and 1893,43 earning him around £1,257 (£114,000) in
royalties. Some very high-selling church anthems were extracted from choral-
society favourites. One was ‘God is a Spirit’ from The Woman of Samaria (1867)
by William Sterndale Bennett: ‘God is a Spirit’ sold over 10,000 copies at the
beginning of the 1880s, and this was on top of the work in its original form which
continued to sell over 1,000 copies a year in the early part of the decade.44 But
there were many flops for Novello too. These included H. T. Welch’s Preces and
Responses which between 1892 and 1896 sold only thirteen copies;45 the Rev.
H. J. Sheppard’s Plainsong Service No. 2 (an idiom that admittedly would have
limited its appeal) which sold under 500 copies from 1885 to 1898; and the Rev.
W. Rayson’s Magnificat and Nunc Dimittis in E which sold under 2,000 copies
from 1882 to 1903.46 Given the Victorian vogue for Tallis,47 a good market was
anticipated for the Versicles and Responses […] with the Festival Harmonies after
Tallis and accordingly 2,015 copies were printed to meet the demand; however,
between 1889 and 1902 only some 200 were sold, and most were eventually
pulped.48 But the level of demand for church music meant that Novello’s
scattergun approach – of publishing many titles as cheaply as possible – virtually
guaranteed some financial return.
The choral-society market was well supplied by contemporary composers.
Alfred Gaul (1837–1913) was organist of St Augustine’s, Edgbaston (an area
in the city of Birmingham), and conductor of several local choral societies,
which positioned him well to have his works performed in Birmingham and
the Midlands. His dozen cantatas, such as Ruth and The Holy City, enjoyed
considerable popularity.49 Gaul calculated his appeal shrewdly: he did not sell the
copyright of his works, but instead paid Novello the production costs of his music
in return for much larger royalties on sales.50 This approach (with the composer,
rather than the business, taking the financial risk) had obvious advantages for
Novello, except in such as Gaul’s case where sales were very high. The vocal score
of Ruth (1881), retailing in paperback at 2s, paid Gaul royalties of 1s 4d on each
one sold and between 1881 and 1890 there were over 11,000 sales in this format.51
Gaul’s most popular work, The Holy City (1882), sold over 16,000 copies in
paperback between 1883 and 1887 (2s. 6d. retail, 1s. 8d. royalty), and some 162,000
copies by Gaul’s death in 1913.52 In 1920, and with demand evidently continuing,
Novello paid Gaul’s estate some £1,685 for the copyright and plates of his cantatas
and five part songs.53 John Henry Maunder’s cantata Olivet to Calvary (1904)
turned out to be a vogue work often paired with Stainer’s immensely popular The
Crucifixion, but this time Novello secured the copyright, paying Maunder £100
plus a royalty of 3d per copy on sales above 8,000.54 In the light of the cantata’s
success, Novello improved its royalty for Maunder’s Bethlehem (1910), increasing
it to 4d after 6,000 sales.55 These sorts of works often inspired great affection,
with annual performances becoming something of a church’s local musical
tradition.56 This could give them surprising longevity as commercial propositions.
The instruction-primer market provided music publishers with significant
opportunities too. The self-improvement aspect of Victorian music culture has
received comparatively little attention, and the professional benefit to musicians
themselves – which was one result of the more systematic teaching of music
prompted by grade exams – has been largely overlooked.57 What was important
about Novello’s involvement in this field was that it had the resources to build
up a wide-ranging series of educational texts, commissioning or encouraging
submissions from authoritative figures. In 1877 (about the time Stainer was
apparently music advisor), it began its series of ‘Novello Primers’. They appeared
under Stainer’s editorial supervision, retailing at either 1s or 2s, and their sales
demonstrate considerable demand. Between 1879 and 1889, Ernst Pauer’s Piano
(2s) sold 44,335 copies in the UK and William H. Cumming’s Rudiments (1s) sold
66,533.58 The large sale of Rudiments was not surprising in a very literate age
50 Michael Hurd describes this ‘author’s property’ scheme in Vincent Novello, p. 106.
51 GB-Lbl, Add. MS 69520, fol. 461; Add. MS 69522, fol. 279.
52 GB-Lbl, Add. MS 69521, fol. 153/4; Add. MS 69522, fol. 658.
53 GB-Lbl, Ms. Mus. 817, fol. 405.
54 GB-Lbl, Ms. Mus. 817, fol. 453.
55 Ibid.
56 In my student days in the late 1970s, I remember being grateful for the fees from
accompanying Stainer’s The Crucifixion and Maunder’s Olivet to Calvary on such
occasions.
57 I outline the social and professional transformation of the music teacher within the
wider Victorian context in The Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music: A
Social and Cultural History (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2013).
58 Pauer’s royalties were £345 and Cumming’s were £258. Novello enforced the
customary practice of trade discount called ‘thirteen as twelve’, so paying royalty
on only twelve of the thirteen copies supplied. The Commission Books indicate
that the ‘thirteen as twelve’ terms were applied by Novello on the annual gross
numbers of copies distributed, regardless of whether any individual retailer had
actually ordered a dozen at any one time. This (sharp) practice really bit composers
whose works sold in large numbers.
59 With royalties of £936 19s 8d for Harmony and £661 4s 2d for Organ.
60 GB-Lbl, Add. MS 69526, fol. 28.
61 Arthur Hutchings, Church Music in the Nineteenth Century (London: Herbert
Jenkins, 1967), p. 127.
expressed, Hutchings’s assessments have critical acuity. The fact remains that for
over a century and a quarter Stainer’s The Crucifixion (1887) has – despite all the
derision thrown at it by commentators of the high-art tradition – maintained a
place in the church-music repertoire. The focus of Hutchings’s aperçu helps us to
understand more clearly just why a work saddled with epithets like ‘squalid music’
and ‘banal and sentimental’ should yet continue to hold an appeal for performers
and audiences.62 Although in its musical character The Crucifixion seems
‘middlebrow’ at best, the work’s specifically religious purpose – couched in an
idiom of congenially emotional harmonies spiced by the occasional melodramatic
tang – conveyed a certain aura that elevated it in the ears of many church choirs
and congregations onto a higher artistic sphere.63
Hutchings’s analogy explains The Crucifixion’s attractiveness – and its staying
power. The prerequisite for success in the amateur market is music that satisfies
its performers and is pleasurable to audiences. And as Gilbert and Sullivan’s
Savoy operas amply demonstrated, there was a huge ‘middlebrow’ market for
operetta. When, as in The Crucifixion’s case, the devotional libretto also had
moments of drama, the result (a form of amateur operatics but so much easier
to stage) satisfied generations of volunteer church musicians.64 The appeal
of Stainer’s music meant that his service music and church oratorios sold in
enormous quantities, attesting to its considerable popularity. A contemporary
review of Stainer’s ‘O Clap your Hands’, although in some ways a typical Musical
Times ‘puff ’, identifies its appeal as both practical (with the organ providing safety
in its support of the voices) and attractive:
The harmonies are for the most part simple, though coloured occasionally
with so much of the chromatic element as gives them life, and strength, and
variety; and they are so distributed for the voices as to produce a full and
sonorous body of tone. There is so much of interest in the part-writing as
to make the music attractive to the singers, which is a sure means of effect
upon an audience. The organ part extensively amplifies the vocal score, and
enriches, without obscuring, the sounds to be poured forth by the singers.65
More recently, William Gatens has argued that Stainer’s High Victorian idiom
steers a way between secular theatricality, on one hand, and, on the other,
the dispassionate coldness (or, as Stainer expressed it, the ‘danger of fanciful
counterpoint’) which characterized the contrapuntal writing of composers such
as Tallis.66 For Nicholas Temperley, Stainer’s music was welcomed by parish
congregations because they ‘looked to their choir music not for intellectual
challenge but for beauty, consolation and reassurance. […] Stainer’s emphasis
on pleasant, regular melody and rich harmony was not due to ignorance or bad
taste […] but was a principled acceptance […] for the needs of the contemporary
church’. 67
As we have seen, catering for the Anglican liturgy offered Novello considerable
opportunity. The outcomes of the nineteenth-century Anglican revival, and
particularly the Tractarian movement, benefitted church music generally,
although the importance accorded to music in the worship of individual parishes
was determined by their style of churchmanship.68 Some major parish churches
(Leeds is a celebrated example) maintained a full choral tradition, while many
smaller ones would have (at least) an anthem sung at each main Sunday service.69
After the initial purchase of a choir set of each anthem, there would be the need
for ongoing renewal: buying new copies to replace worn or damaged stock of
canticles and responses for Matins and Evensong and Communion settings
(all likely to be regularly sung once in the repertoire) or maintaining sets of
occasional anthems whose texts were appropriate only to a particular church
festival. This process of continuing renewal (easily accommodated for anthems
whose unit cost was deliberately kept low) could be extended almost indefinitely
if the music in question had become an established favourite or was seen as part
of the musical tradition of a particular church. Stainer’s considerable annual
income from royalties on the vocal scores of The Crucifixion (see Appendix, Table
3.2, pp. 83–4) illustrates how this combination of liturgical cycle and musical
popularity fuelled sales, even at a more substantial two-shilling cost. This is a
classic hare and tortoise situation: Stainer would never match the phenomenal
profit in the sheet-music sales of ballads, such as Sullivan’s The Lost Chord
(which sold some half-million copies between 1877 and 1902) and The Holy City
(which at its high point sold some 50,000 copies a year by the 1890s).70 Rather,
Stainer’s commercial value lay in the slower, but steadier, income that accrued
from success in niche amateur markets. And in these the composer enjoyed
considerable popularity.
1899 and £157 in August 1900, the latter to ‘Include all his works up to this date
not previously accounted for’. 74 There are also three ‘by services’ payments for
sundry work, each of about £100. Altogether, these entries for 1890 to 1901 (the
year of Stainer’s death), total £1,170 15s (or some £104,000 on the RPI in today’s
terms).
We know from the accounts that Henry Clayton (Novello’s Company
Secretary) prepared for the family after Stainer’s death in April 1901 that the
royalties generated by his works from 1895 to 1900 totalled some £1,542.75 The
Stainer Archive contains a document, prepared by Stainer’s eldest son, John
Frederick Randall, who inherited all the royalties accruing from his father’s
works, which attempts to reconstruct Stainer’s royalty earnings from 1880.76 Even
though Randall’s figures are indicative, rather than definitive, they suggest that
from 1888, Stainer’s annual royalties never dipped below £200 and came closer
to averaging £250. The total of Stainer’s known royalties for the period 1890 to
1900 (the years for which the copyright payments are available) comes to £2,794.
Combining this royalty total with the £1,170 15s of copyright and fees earned
for the same period produces for Stainer a Novello income amounting to some
£3,965 (or some £352,000 today) for 1890 to 1901. Table 3.2 (in the Appendix)
reproduces the accounts prepared by Clayton. They show the scale of royalties
Stainer was receiving and the variety of formats Novello used to maximize the
income generated by single works,77 such as congregational materials and scores
in Tonic Sol-fa notation, despite scanty take-up. (Presumably the firm felt that
not producing Tonic Sol-fa editions would prevent the take-up of works in those
parts of the country where that notational system was still heavily used.)78 We
see that there were small sales for the Twelve Old Carols and for Stainer’s songs,
which underlines the point that a composer who did not write works for choral
societies was unlikely to see much royalty income. Such circumstances could
make selling the copyright a more economically rational decision. On the other
hand, The Daughter of Jairus continued to be popular with choral societies,
regularly selling between 3,000 and 4,000 copies up to Stainer’s death and
earning him some £695 in royalties (or nearly £62,000 in today’s terms). Up to
Stainer’s death, The Crucifixion brought him some £1,000 (around £89,000).
However, Stainer’s income from Novello falls very far short of the £34,525
probate value of his estate in 1901.79 In the absence of a biographer’s explanation
74 Ibid. The Stainer Archive lists some 192 copyrighted works seemingly with Novello,
together with a considerable number of tunes in hymnbooks with other publishers
(GB-DRu, Stainer Archive, STA 1/2/19).
75 Compiled in the Appendix to this chapter as Table 3.2 (GB-DRu, Stainer Archive,
STA 1/2/64).
76 GB-DRu, Stainer Archive, STA 1/2/63.
77 Surprisingly, the Boards’ editions for The Crucifixion and The Daughter of Jairus,
which retailed at 2s carrying a 2d royalty, are not mentioned by Clayton.
78 See Nettel, Music in the Five Towns, pp. 3–11.
79 Jeremy Dibble, ‘Stainer, Sir John (1840–1901)’, ODNB; the figure for wealth at death
was added by ODNB.
aspect, set apart from commercial interactions. The orthodoxy that a work of
art exists autonomously and that its worth can be measured only in terms of its
aesthetic value has encouraged music scholars to be reticent – even squeamish –
about discussing consumption because of the conflicting perspectives this
introduces.85 Not surprisingly, therefore, those who have pioneered studies
of music’s economics have been economists with a strong enthusiasm for
music, such as Cyril Ehrlich and Alan Peacock, rather than musicologists.86
After all, part and parcel of what economists do is unsentimental investigation
of any sort of commodity that represents a tangible good or service, the
econometrics of its production and its market performance. Music’s existence
as an economic good is indisputable. Its direct monetary significance is evident
in the demonstrable economic relationship between composer, publisher and
purchaser, as this chapter has argued. Concert tickets are economic transactions
between performer and audience (via their respective agencies), and most
performers have to face the reality of programme-building with works that are
likely to attract an audience. And there are many other economic relationships
that play their part in music’s trajectory from composer to consumers.
Howard Becker’s Art Worlds presents a sociological model of the production
of artworks. Its valuable insights help demystify the relationship between
composer, publisher and purchaser/user by identifying the interdependence of
the multiplicity of contributors who make music practices ‘work’. From Becker’s
perspective, works of art ‘are not the products of individual makers […] [but]
joint products of all the people who cooperate via an art world’s characteristic
conventions to bring works like that into existence’. Thus the individual art
world ‘exists in the cooperative activity of those people, not as a structure of
organization’. 87
Sociological and economic viewpoints underline just what an intertwined
commercial and cultural process music publishing is. Interpreting this intricacy
requires a frame that is broad enough to study the very different types of contexts
85 For a discussion of these issues in classical music practice, see Lydia Goehr, The
Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, rev. edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2007).
86 In addition to the Ehrlich and Peacock/Weir books (cited above in nn. 11 and 9,
respectively), see, inter alia, Ehrlich, The Music Profession in Britain, and Ehrlich,
The Piano; Alan Peacock, Paying the Piper: Culture, Music and Money (Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press, 1993); Frederic M. Scherer, Quarter Notes and Bank
Notes: The Economics of Music Composition in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth
Centuries (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004); and Ruth Towse,
A Textbook of Cultural Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2010). Cyril Ehrlich was a prime mover of the Royal Musical Association 1988
Annual Conference, ‘Music in the Market-Place’, and papers from that conference,
introduced by Ehrlich, were published in JRMA 114, no. 1 (1989).
87 Howard S. Becker, Art Worlds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982),
p. 35; for further elaboration of ideas of cultural production based around Becker,
see Peter J. Martin, Music and the Sociological Gaze: Art Worlds and Cultural
Production (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006).
that make music practices ‘work’. When, for example, we examine the Stainer–
Novello success story, we can explain aspects of it in terms of the retail world and
product dissemination – you need to shift stuff, regardless. But that is an axiom
which does not slot easily into musicology’s preoccupation with quality and
aesthetic value. Baldly stated, Stainer composed art music of low aesthetic quality
but high economic value. Its popularity gave Stainer commercial significance, and
his marketability was enhanced by his professional appointments and general
standing in the musical world as a scholar of early music as well as a player, choir
trainer and educator. We remember Stainer now primarily for The Crucifixion
because it has retained a place in the repertoire and in people’s affections.88 But
The Crucifixion’s staying power requires a sociological as well as a musicological
explanation. As Becker suggests, ‘If you define your work as done to meet
someone else’s practical needs, then function, defined as external to the work’s
intrinsic character, is an important ideological and aesthetic consideration.’ 89
Stainer’s parish church music reflected his strongly personal religious attitude.
His ‘mission’ was to provide straightforward, technically undemanding settings
that as performed by an average choir would enhance, rather than detract from,
the liturgy. The Crucifixion exemplifies this ambition. It holds its place because it
is effective in meeting the needs of a social context (that of a church congregation
and its choir at a solemn point of the liturgical year), and because it does so in a
way that makes it seem like ‘great music’ to many.
It is clear from the longevity The Crucifixion has enjoyed that its functional,
or utilitarian, achievement (to which its appealing musical manner is an essential
ingredient) has counted for rather more than the aesthetic criterion of art for
art’s sake that formed the basis of earlier criticism of Stainer’s compositions.90
There was an intrinsic part of The Crucifixion’s success – its clear and convenient
printed format, its price, its advertising and its efficient dissemination – that lay
with Novello. The commercial realities of this period of British publishing meant
that when it came to functionality, there was effectively nothing to distinguish
between the sacred and the secular spheres. Certainly we see in both kinds of
music considerable overlap in musical construction and sometimes even in
manner, as Hutchings’s critique of The Crucifixion identifies, and as is evident
from the idiom of commercial ballads, such as Stephen Adams’s The Holy City,
Arthur Sullivan’s The Lost Chord and Frederic Cowen’s The Better Land.91 In a
period when publishing revenue depended on the sale of actual copies (and not
receipts from such as performing rights or broadcasting), the essential quality a
commercial publisher was looking for was utility, or fitness for purpose, as it is
often described today. The evidence of the Novello Archive indicates that, as far
as contemporary compositions were concerned (rather than canonical oratorios
and choral works), the firm made its publishing decisions very much on the
basis of the functionality or utility of the music it was offered. And what is clear
from the firm’s prosperity is that Novello traded very well by understanding the
commercial opportunities that the amateur music market presented.
Appendix
Table 3.1 Print runs of selected anthems in Novello’s Octavo Anthems Series
Idea of Art.indb 83
Work Price Royalty 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 total
s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d
Crucifixion v.s. 1 6 2d £73 6 10 £68 16 0 £88 10 10 £58 12 0 £86 16 0 £76 14 0 £452 15 8
Crucifixion Words and Hymn 2 20s per £48 10 0 £19 0 0 £20 10 6 £19 0 0 £22 0 0 £21 0 0 £150 0 6
Tunes 1,000
Crucifixion Words and Hymn 2 20s per n/a n/a n/a n/a nil nil nil
Tunes Sol-fa (pub. Feb 1899) 1,000
Daughter of Jairus v.s. 1 6 2d £29 6 0 £34 6 8 £36 1 8 £39 3 4 £32 14 0 £34 18 1 £206 9 9
Organ Primer (No. 3) 2 0 2d £34 0 8 £31 19 7 £33 3 7 £32 16 4 £31 19 6 £29 3 11 £193 3 7
Harmony Primer (No. 8) 2 0 2d £64 6 5 £57 5 5 £60 14 11 £59 2 0 £57 7 0 £52 14 7 £351 10 4
Novello, John Stainer and the Amateur Music Market
(No. 50)
02/02/2016 15:13
Idea of Art.indb 84
Table 3.2 continued
Work Price Royalty 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 total
84
s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d £ s d
Exercises for Female Voices 1 6 ¾d nil nil £2 14 9 10 6 6 0 12 0 £4 3 3
(No. 50a)
Theory of Harmony 7 6 1s £5 2 0 £5 4 0 £3 7 6 £3 7 6 £1 16 0 £3 0 0 £21 17 0
column totals £278 6 7½ £245 6 10 £278 11 7 £239 18 0 £259 19 1 £239 1511½ £1,541 18 1
In this table, ‘n/a’ indicates that the work was not yet published; ‘nil’ is used when sales of a published work were insufficient to produce royalties.
v.s. = vocal score
¾d = 3 farthings
Source: GB-DRu, Stainer Archive, STA 1/2/64. (Reproduced by permission of Durham University Library from material in the Stainer Archive
donated by Michael Newsom and John Newsom, as descendants of John Frederick Randall Stainer.) The original document is an official statement of
account to the Stainer family and carries the declaration ‘Signed off for Novello by Henry Clayton, 18 April 1901’.
02/02/2016 15:13
Part II
Personalities
W hen, in his 1888 book The Prima Donna, Henry Sutherland Edwards
played on longstanding assumptions that prima donnas paid scant respect
to the mores of the British public and pursued lifestyles marked by vast incomes
and dubious morals, all compounded by their foreignness, he was accentuating
a gulf between the singers’ world and that of the population at large.1 This
characterization of the relationship between prima donnas and society should not
be accepted unquestioningly, however, for it overlooks an important factor: the
cultivation of a perception of major female singers as, on the contrary, espousing
respectable social and cultural values. To explore this issue, the present chapter
focuses on the case of the Swedish soprano Jenny Lind (1820–87) to investigate
the role of imagery, as used by the sheet-music and print-producing industries, in
promoting the notion of the archetypal prima donna as endowed with admirable
personal qualities in addition to feminine attractiveness. It also considers Lind’s
choice of repertoire for performance beyond the opera house – a means by which
famous singers engaged with society on a broad scale. Here the discussion will
concentrate on the ballad, a major genre of English-language song, in relation to
her performances in Britain and America.
Having begun her career in her native Stockholm, Lind established an
international reputation in Berlin and Vienna before making her London debut
at Her Majesty’s Theatre on 4 May 1847. Two years later she withdrew from the
stage – a decision attributed to anti-theatrical religious sentiment – and turned
exclusively to concert and oratorio performances. She undertook a concert tour
of the United States from 1850 to 1852, later settling in Britain.
Lind was of a generation able to benefit from a number of important
developments that had occurred in the fields of image-making and marketing
since 1806, when the etchings that marked the London debut of Angelica
Catalani, the outstanding soprano of the early years of the nineteenth century,
were created and disseminated.2 Particular advances dated from the 1820s to the
1 Henry Sutherland Edwards, The Prima Donna: Her History and Surroundings from
the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols (London: Remington, 1888); see,
for example, the implications in his account of Pauline Lucca’s personal life (vol. 2,
pp. 125–34).
2 As one example, see the hand-coloured etchings ‘Madame Catalani in Semiramide’
by Robert Dighton, which he published in December 1806 (National Portrait
Gallery, London, D2026–2031; D13420–13421; D15939; D106689).
86
1840s. Print production increased greatly; indeed, Rodney K. Engen has referred
to these decades as having seen a ‘boom in the print industry’.3 The same period
saw crucial developments in music publishing, which has been described by
Derek B. Scott as ‘[a]longside the promotion of public performances, […] the
most important musical money-making enterprise of the new commercial age’.4
Distribution was aided by another major feature of the era: the growth in the
railway network.
Advances in lithography and colouring techniques transformed the practi
calities of imagery.5 By the 1830s, illustrations large enough to accommodate
eyecatching portraits of singers had colonized much of the space on the title
pages of numerous sheet-music publications, in addition to appearing in
magazines and prints (a term that for present purposes denotes freestanding
reproductions of existing works). To whatever extent the loss of ‘aura’ (the unique
quality of an artwork highlighted by Walter Benjamin in his 1936 essay ‘The Work
of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’) was felt in the nineteenth century
when a work of art was duplicated, for many people the process facilitated
increased access to celebrated artworks (albeit through the medium of copies),
while for others it held obvious practical benefits. In the case of images in sheet
music, illustrators, printers, composers, versifiers, those having vested interests
in the music publishing industry, and the many others falling into Bourdieu’s
category of ‘cultural intermediaries’ all stood to gain in ways ranging from
individual employment to increased prosperity accruing from their various
enterprises.6 The effects of this for singers will be considered below.
of £14 14s (14 guineas) each. In 1847, working, he noted, from a ‘German print’ –
originating from a portrait by the portraitist L’ Allemand, as we shall later see –
he received £10 for a lithograph of Lind, important as the basis of a number of
subsequent illustrations.8 It is difficult to place these figures in a context as
regards Lane’s own profession, due to a lack of information. Some sense of
comparison may be gained, however, by noting that in 1838 and 1841 the London
music publisher Novello proposed payments of £10 and £15 to Mendelssohn for
two psalm settings.9 A broader comparative perspective will emerge during the
following discussion.
It is clear that sales of ballads could be very substantial. Apparently, more than
80,000 copies of Michael Balfe’s ‘When Other Lips and Other Hearts’ – marketed
without an image, as was normal for items originally published as a component
of an English opera (in this case The Bohemian Girl of 1843) – were sold within
a year following the premiere, generating over £8,000.10 The levels of public
demand and profits to be made from song publications are further demonstrated
by the high premiums publishers were willing to pay. In 1840, an author could
receive £100 for writing a theatrical farce and £30 for merely the words of a song,11
while the publishers Cramer, Beale, & Co. paid Balfe 100 guineas for the copyright
of ‘The Lonely Rose’, the ballad sung by Jenny Lind at the composer’s concert
at Exeter Hall, London, on 29 January 1849.12 Here the packed audience, which
paid 10s 6d for an unreserved seat or twice this for a reserved seat (the tickets
were sold by the publishers, acting as ticket agents avant la lettre), generated
over £1,600 in receipts, which, since this was a benefit concert, Balfe would have
received in full. Handsome receipts from Lind’s concerts, not least for charities,
8 National Portrait Gallery, London, MS 61–63: R. J. Lane Account Books 1825–1872
(3 vols), vol. 2, entries for 11 September to 21 December 1835. Included were the
singers Antonio Rubini, Antonio Tamburini, Luigi Lablache and Giulia Grisi, plus
the ballerina Marie Taglioni. Regarding the lithograph of Lind, see vol. 3, entry for
8 February 1847. Regarding currency, twelve pence (12d) equalled 1 shilling (1s);
20 shillings equalled £1; and £1 1s (i.e. 21 shillings) equalled 1 guinea. The lower
payment that Lane received for the image of Lind would reflect the fact that here
he was copying an existing work rather than creating a new one, calling for less
expenditure of labour and time.
9 Cooper, The House of Novello, p. 101.
10 Basil Walsh, Michael W. Balfe: A Unique Victorian Composer (Dublin: Irish
Academic Press, 2008), pp. 93–4.
11 George Biddlecombe, English Opera from 1834 to 1864 with Particular Reference to
the Works of Michael Balfe (New York: Garland Publishing, 1994), p. 37.
12 Lind also sang extracts from Mozart’s Le nozze di Figaro, Bellini’s Norma and
Meyerbeer’s Ein Feldlager in Schlesien, and the duet ‘Con pazienza sopportiamo’
from Valentino Fioravanti’s opera Il fanatico per la musica with the bass Lablache.
See MW, 3 February 1849, pp. 69–70 (this includes reference to the receipts);
Times (London), 30 January 1849; ILN, 3 February 1849. Regarding the copyright
of ‘The Lonely Rose’, see MW, 27 January 1849, p. 62. For pre-performance
advertisements including information on the purchase of tickets, see Times, 19
January 1849.
were normal: those for the Brompton Hospital, London, in 1848 generated over
£1,766, and those for the Southern (Toxteth) Hospital in Liverpool, in 1849, raised
£1,400.13 Lind’s support for charities, both here and later in America, safeguarded
her, at least partially, from the accusations of avarice often levelled at other prima
donnas.
Such receipts from concert attendance suggest that significant numbers of
the Victorian population were able to afford sheet music and music-related
prints, and that they were enthusiastic about the music and about obtaining
it. Even so, when Cramer, Beale, & Co. set the purchase price of ‘The Lonely
Rose’ at 2s (requiring sales of over a thousand copies merely to meet Balfe’s
copyright fee)14 rather than raising the price to capitalize on the extra appeal
of Lind’s fame, the firm was maintaining the standard price for five-page ballad
publications (a title page plus four pages of music). Market forces were at work:
this pricing was applied regardless of voice types or associations with individual
performers, and whether or not an illustration was included.15 Cramer, Beale, &
Co. did not include an image of Lind on the title page of ‘The Lonely Rose’; the
song had the cachet of being premiered by her, and the firm could advertise it as
one of the only two ‘English ballads sung by Mlle. Lind’ (the other being Julius
Benedict’s ‘Take This Lute’ – likewise Cramer, Beale, & Co.’s publication, and
with words by the same author, Edward Fitzball, a further specific beneficiary
of the song industry).16 Two shillings compared well to costs for other domestic
commodities: it was about the same price as five issues of the Times newspaper,
half a pound of tea, or – a particular sign of the epoch – a pound of good-quality
bed feathers,17 and was cheaper than, for example, a copy of Mendelssohn’s
six ‘Original Melodies’ (the Songs without Words) (4s) and Novello’s oblong
edition of Messiah (6s),18 though these were physically more substantial than
the standard song sheet. Pianos themselves – a sine qua non of domestic music-
making – were available from 25 guineas to above 120, depending on size and
type.19 Prints embodying portraits of celebrities also varied in cost: higher-quality
13 Henry Scott Holland and W. S. Rockstro, Memoir of Madame Jenny Lind-
Goldschmidt: Her Early Art-Life and Dramatic Career, 1820–1851, 2 vols (London:
John Murray, 1891), vol. 2, p. 263.
14 Walsh, Michael W. Balfe, p. 130. The ballad was published in two versions, in F
major and D major, doubtless to appeal to a broader market.
15 The lowest price for vocal sheet music relating to Lind that I have found is 1s 6d,
charged by Leoni Lee & Coxhead for arrangements of Italian operatic items in
1849.
16 For the advertisement, see ILN, 7 April 1849. Cramer, Beale, & Co. frequently
relied solely on verbal title pages to market their products. For an example of
their use of illustration for a sheet-music cover, see Henry W. Godban, Gems of
Maritana (London: Cramer, Beale, & Co., [1846]).
17 The Times cost 5d. For the prices of tea and bed feathers, see advertisements in the
ILN, 8 May 1847, and 10 February 1849.
18 Regarding the cost of Novello’s publications, see Cooper, The House of Novello,
pp. 11–13.
19 See ILN, 10 February 1849, p. 95; Ehrlich, The Piano, p. 39.
examples seem to have been more expensive than illustrated song publications.20
In practice, an illustrated sheet-music cover was a more versatile object. A print
of a prima donna was a static portrait that functioned as an object of gaze; an
image of the same singer on a sheet-music cover could be viewed in the same
way, but it was inextricably linked to the accompanying music and therefore
would especially be seen when a song was selected for performance by a singer
and pianist (doubtless sometimes one and the same person) or chosen by another
member of a domestic gathering. Then it would often be left in full view on the
piano while a further selection was performed.
These prices suggest that the largest portion of the purchasing public was
from the middle classes. This group is notoriously difficult to define; however, for
present purposes we may accept the views of Geoffrey Best and William Weber
that the minimum middle-class annual income was £150 and ‘the threshold of
the upper-middle class’ lay at £1,000 (putting into stark relief the £10,000 Lind
earned merely from her tour of Britain in 1848). Given additional information
collated by Victoria Cooper, it is apparent that while frequent expenditures
on sheet music and other musical pursuits would have been beyond the
means of a schoolmaster (earning £81 2s 2d in 1851), they would have been well
within the reach of families such as those of an engineer (having an income of
£479 that year), and even more so for higher income groups such as barristers
(£1,837 10s 0d).21
The success of sheet-music publication as a whole reflects the acumen with
which it was tailored to the cultural desiderata of its consumership. Moreover,
within the ‘domestic sphere’ characteristic of middle-class culture, with its
feminized ethos, music arguably had special significance for women, including as
an indicator of a woman’s ‘cultural capital’ and, as Phyllis Weliver and Jodi Lustig
have observed, facilitating courtship.22 I suggest, therefore, that sheet-music
20 Purchase prices appear not to have been stated on prints themselves. In 1854,
prices for an engraved portrait of the American author Harriet Beecher Stowe
were advertised as ‘10s. 6d. – Artists’ Proofs, Two Guineas – Proofs, with
fac-simile Autograph, One Guinea’. See the advertisement in the front matter of
vol. 1 of her Sunny Memories, 2 vols (London: Sampson Low, Son, & Co., 1854).
21 Geoffrey Best, Mid-Victorian Britain, 1851–1875 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson,
1971), p. 82; Cooper, The House of Novello, pp. 10–13; Weber, Music and the
Middle Class, p. 28. Cooper gave sums of money in decimal format (£ p); for
consistency with other references to monetary values in the present discussion,
I have converted these to the pre-decimalization format of pounds, shillings
and pence (£ s d). Weber’s distinction between ‘the modest middle class and the
bourgeois elite’ is a reminder of the complexity of the term ‘middle class’ (Music
and the Middle Class, p. 28). For Lind’s earnings during her 1848 tour, see Holland
and Rockstro, Memoir, vol. 2, p. 237. As a comparison, in 1840 the leader of
the Philharmonic Society Orchestra received £52 10s for participating in eight
concerts and nine rehearsals (see Deborah Rohr, The Careers of British Musicians,
1750–1850 [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001], p. 126).
22 On cultural capital, see Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production: Essays
on Art and Literature, ed. Randal Johnson (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), p. 7.
Regarding the appeal of publications of operatic extracts and the place of music
within the Victorian home, see Roberta Montemorra Marvin, ‘Verdian Opera in
the Victorian Parlor’, Fashions and Legacies of Nineteenth-Century Italian Opera,
ed. Roberta Montemorra Marvin and Hilary Poriss (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2010), pp. 53–75, at pp. 55–7. On music and courtship, see Phyllis
Weliver, Women Musicians in Victorian Fiction, 1860–1900: Representations of
Music, Science and Gender in the Leisured Home (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000),
p. 33; and Jodi Lustig, ‘The Piano’s Progress: The Piano at Play in the Victorian
Novel’, The Idea of Music in Victorian Fiction, ed. Sophie Fuller and Nicky Losseff
(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 83–104, at p. 88.
23 The place of buying sheet music within the purchasing practices of women as a
whole in the nineteenth century cannot be investigated here, but Elizabeth Barry’s
comment that ‘[t]he female is firmly the consumer of publicity’ in this period
sheds relevant light (‘Celebrity, Cultural Production and Public Life’, International
Journal of Cultural Studies 11 [2008], 251–8, at p. 255).
24 Probably in the months following the agreement with Lind, Cramer, Beale, & Co.
entered into a contract with the Irish soprano Catherine Hayes, who arrived in
London in March 1849. It appears that this contract identified the firm not only as
publishers of Hayes’s ballads but also as her concert agents. Regarding contractual
arrangements concerning the publication of ballads, although Hayes was an
admired performer, knowledge of her contract is unlikely to have had the same
degree of impact on the public and on the music profession as Lind’s agreement
with the firm, given Lind’s extraordinary reputation. In 1851, while Lind was in
America, Cramer, Beale, & Co. published an advertisement for the ‘only English
ballads’ performed by both her and Hayes. According to this advertisement, Lind
had added a third such ballad to her repertoire, ‘Oh, Summer Morn’, alongside
those by Balfe and Benedict. That the new ballad was attributed to Meyerbeer, yet
was defined as ‘English’, indicates the publisher’s willingness to finesse matters of
national definition for the sake of commercial benefit. See Basil Walsh, Catherine
Hayes, 1818–1861: The Hibernian Prima Donna (Dublin: Irish Academic Press,
2000), pp. 115, 170; MW, 11 January, 1851, p. 32. Regarding the ‘royalty ballad’, see
Scott, The Singing Bourgeois, pp. 127–8; Scott, Sounds of the Metropolis, pp. 26,
32, 34–7; and Biddlecombe, English Opera, pp. 37–8. On publishers’ methods
of promoting music associated with an instrumentalist, see Therese Ellsworth,
‘Victorian Pianists as Concert Artists: The Case of Arabella Goddard (1836–1922)’,
The Piano in Nineteenth-Century British Culture: Instruments, Performers and
Repertoire, ed. Therese Ellsworth and Susan Wollenberg (Aldershot: Ashgate,
2007), pp. 149–69, at p. 160.
25 Gill Perry with Joseph Roach and Shearer West, The First Actresses: Nell Gwyn
to Sarah Siddons (London: National Portrait Gallery, 2011), pp. 21–7. Regarding
imagery of operatic performers in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries, see ibid., pp. 77–102, at pp. 88–93; Michael Burden, ‘Imaging Mandane:
Character, Costume, Monument’, Music in Art 34 (2009), 107–35.
26 On illustrations in the ILN, see Roberta Montemorra Marvin, ‘Idealizing the
Prima Donna in Mid-Victorian London’, The Arts of the Prima Donna in the
Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Rachel Cowgill and Hilary Poriss (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2012), pp. 21–41. I am indebted to Annemarie McAllister for
further information on the representation of opera in the ILN. On sheet-music
illustrations, see Thomas L. Christensen, ‘Four-Hand Piano Transcription and
Geographies of Nineteenth-Century Musical Reception’, JAMS 52 (1999), 255–98;
Marvin, ‘Verdian Opera in the Victorian Parlor’; Lynda Nead, Victorian Babylon:
People, Streets and Images in Nineteenth-Century London (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 2000), pp. 109–46; Ronald Pearsall, Victorian Sheet Music Covers
(Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1972); Scott, The Singing Bourgeois, pp. 54–5;
Steve Waksman, ‘Selling the Nightingale: P. T. Barnum, Jenny Lind, and the
Management of the American Crowd’, Arts Marketing: An International Journal
1/2 (2011), 108–20, at pp. 110–11.
27 Regarding this point, see Marvin, ‘Idealizing the Prima Donna’, esp. pp. 27–8.
28 On visibility, see Irving Rein, Philip Kotler and Martin Stoller, High Visibility:
The Making and Marketing of Professionals into Celebrities (Lincolnwood, IL:
NTC Business Books, 1997), quoted in Stardom and Celebrity: A Reader, ed.
Sean Redmond and Su Holmes (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2007), p. 5.
Pauline Viardot maintained that demand for images also reflected the success
of a particular opera production: see her letter to George Sand of 7 August 1849
in Lettres inédites de George Sand et de Pauline Viardot (1839–1849), ed. Thérèse
Marix-Spire (Paris: Nouvelles Éditions Latines, 1959), p. 286.
29 For the image of Lind’s debut performance in an Italian-language version of
Meyerbeer’s Robert le diable (all operas were produced in Italian at Her Majesty’s
Theatre), see ILN, 8 May 1847. This illustration was probably modelled on the
vignette incorporated in the title page of the vocal score of the opera published
in Paris by Maurice Schlesinger [1831]. For the cartoons in Punch, see, for
example, 10 July 1847, p. 10; 5 August 1848, p. 52. For the fantasy illustrations, see
F. W. N. Bayley, The Souvenir of the Season. The Wake of Extacy, A Memory of
Jenny Lind (London: Willoughby, 1848). For ceramic figurines based upon the
above ILN illustration, see Victoria & Albert Museum C.87-1928, and National
Trust Inventory Numbers 341485 and 341486. Other reflections of the excitement
surrounding Lind were W. H. C. West’s comic song ‘The Jenny Lind Mania’
(London: B. Williams [1847?]), and the naming after her of products as diverse as
handkerchiefs and a new design of railway engine (see George Biddlecombe, ‘The
Construction of a Cultural Icon: The Case of Jenny Lind’, NCBMS 3, pp. 45–61,
at p. 45). Also named after her, later, were a hospital in Norwich and an area of
Glasgow. I am obliged to Roberta Montemorra Marvin for further information on
items named after Lind.
30 Holland and Rockstro, Memoir, vol. 1, pp. 362–3. The original is now in the Alte
Nationalgalerie, Berlin, and the copy is in the National Gallery, London. The ring
Figure 4.1
Eduard Magnus,
replica (c. 1861)
of portrait of
Jenny Lind (1846),
oil on canvas
[© National
Portrait Gallery,
London]
towards L’ Allemand’s portrait is less clear. The history of the painting is not
known, though it too probably dates from 1846.31 As noted above, it was this
that provided the model used by Lane in London, but since the original cannot
be located, it is not possible to say how much Lane may have altered it when
producing his version (in Fig. 4.2). (For clarity, however, this image will hereafter
be referred to as L’ Allemand’s.)
Although the portraits show Lind in different dresses and postures (light
material and sitting position in the Magnus, darker material and standing
posture in the L’ Allemand), the more telling distinctions between the two works
shown in the Magnus portrait would not have been confused with a wedding ring,
conventionally of different breadth. I am grateful to Aileen Ribeiro for information
about Lind’s ring shown here and for other information regarding nineteenth-
century fashion, and to Carolin Marie Kreutzfeldt of the Alte Nationalgalerie,
Berlin, for information about the original painting.
31 I am indebted to Alheidis von Rohr for information regarding L’ Allemand.
Figure 4.2
Richard James
Lane, lithograph
(1847) of Jenny
Lind, after Conrad
L’ Allemand
[© National
Portrait Gallery,
London]
32 Thomas Woolnoth, Facts and Faces: Being an Enquiry into the Connection between
Linear and Mental Portraiture, with a Dissertation on Personal and Relative
Beauty, 2nd edn (London: published by the author [and] G. Willis, 1854), pp. 182–6,
205, 226. See also Marvin, ‘Idealizing the Prima Donna’, pp. 29–31.
Figure 4.3 William Kilburn, daguerreotype of Jenny Lind (1848) [Royal Collection Trust /
© Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2015]
where physiognomy was highly regarded, the external was conceived as encoding
the internal, and the illustrations purported to represent this.33
L’ Allemand’s portrait shows Lind wearing a more dramatic dress, again off the
shoulder, and to which she has added a ‘bertha’, a decorative low collar. The style
was fashionable in Berlin and London. However, a comparison with a London
daguerreotype of Lind of 1848 by Kilburn (Fig. 4.3) – instantiating the parallel
expansion of the photographic industry – reveals that what the public saw in
L’ Allemand’s image represents the equivalent of today’s digitized manipulation.
In reality, Lind’s face was plain; here it was made more oval, and her nose was
narrowed. This further reflected contemporary desiderata of female beauty:
Woolnoth extolled an oval face and straight nose. Additionally, Lind’s neck
and hands were slimmed, and the improbably small waist was made far more
noticeable than in the Magnus.34
As has been mentioned, Cramer, Beale, & Co. did not include an illustration
in ‘The Lonely Rose’. But rival firms utilized images of the ‘Swedish Nightingale’
in their sheet music with avidity, varying the presentations to succeed in a
competitive market.35 Stressing Lind’s admirable character and her physical
attractiveness – the two factors central to the Magnus and L’ Allemand portraits –
was a major objective. Examples produced by the publishing house of Charles
Jefferys show how an enterprising firm adapted the German models to this
end. The L’ Allemand image was used for Jefferys’s product ‘Jenny Lind’s Song:
Farewell My Fatherland (Lebe wohl mein Vaterland)’ by ‘Felix Gantier’ – the
title capitalizing on Lind, loyalty to homeland and an overlapping of her Swedish
nationality with contemporary Germanophilia – but with an enlargement of
the eyes to achieve further facial enhancement and emphasis on expression.
Conversely, for the publication of Stephen Glover’s duet ‘Gently Sighs the
Breeze’, the major illustrator John Brandard took the Magnus as his basis, but
developed it in a considerably different manner (Fig. 4.4). Lind is shown standing
and holding music as if performing in concert alongside another outstanding
female singer, the contralto Marietta Alboni. However, I have yet to come across
evidence that they sang together; moreover, the image ‘airbrushed’ the physically
large Alboni and placed her in a subservient position to Lind. As regards Lind
herself, in addition to the predictable enhancement of the rest of her body (slim
waist, delicate arms and hands), her face and expression intensify the effect
created by the Magnus image to the point where she seems endowed with a
Figure 4.4
John Brandard,
lithographic title
page of ‘Gently Sighs
the Breeze’, duet
by Stephen Glover
(London: C[harles]
Jefferys, [1849])
[The Bodleian Libraries,
The University of
Oxford: John Johnson
Collection: Music
Titles 2 (98)]
vision of an ethereal realm – an elevated capacity that would tally with her famed
personal morality.36 Here, I propose, Brandard welded the Magnus model with
a tradition of St Cecilia iconography, marked by this distant ‘gaze’ and a musical
artefact, that can be traced back at least to Raphael’s painting of the saint.37 Not
36 Belief in Lind’s exemplary moral rectitude was unbounded. To cite only two
statements instantiating this, in 1847 Henry Chorley, the music critic of the
Athenaeum, declared that ‘Mdlle. Lind’s character stands high before the curtain
for delicacy, modesty and innocent undervaluation of her own genius – in short,
for goodness unprecedented’ (Athenaeum, 11 December 1847), while in a public
speech given in 1849 the politician Benjamin Disraeli described her as ‘a youthful
maiden, innocent and benignant […] a great artist, sustained by virtue, upheld by
self-respect’ (quoted by Holland and Rockstro, Memoir, vol. 2, pp. 232–3). See also
Biddlecombe, ‘The Construction of a Cultural Icon’, pp. 51–5.
37 A noteworthy precedent is Reynolds’s portrait of the late-eighteenth-century
soprano Mrs Billington. Brandard used a similar facial expression for Lind, though
all purchasers of the duet would have been aware of this artistic element, but the
image would still have contributed to Lind’s quasi-sanctification.38
Besides this, other devices seem mundane. One, used by T. Boosey & Co.
for their publication of Anton Wallerstein’s ‘Jenny Lind’s Favorite [sic] Polka’
(an example of the use of Lind’s image to sell piano music), was to reverse
L’ Allemand’s direction of Lind’s face so she now looks towards the viewer’s
right, a technique that, as we shall see, was later used in America. Another ploy,
an attempt to join the Magnus head to the L’ Allemand body in D’Almaine &
Co.’s publication of George Alexander Hodson’s ‘My Home, My Happy Home’,
foundered on a strikingly inadequate level of artistic expertise.
Illustrations showing Lind as an operatic heroine brought further issues into
play. Gill Perry has argued that because portrayals of actresses enacting a role are
‘representations of a staged or pseudo-event, translated through the conventions
and aesthetic preferences of the artist, [they are] in a sense twice removed from
the supposedly “real” person’.39 This opinion is supported by imagery of Lind in
operatic performance. In part it was imposed by the illustrators’ need to find a
distinctive presentation of what in effect was a standardized heroine. In the
case of Donizetti’s La figlia del reggimento the problem lay in the uniformity of
her obligatory soldier’s outfit; for Bellini’s La sonnambula (another of Lind’s
popular roles) it arose from the requirement to show the eponymous heroine
in a sleepwalking scene. The usual solution for illustrators was to incorporate a
novel posture or variant of the face, but with the latter, again, shaped by concepts
of attractiveness, and regardless of how far it deviated from verisimilitude. Thus,
images of Lind in La sonnambula varied from relatively close versions of the
L’ Allemand model to others slimming her face to a striking degree, frequently
with prominent eyes now ostensibly justified by the notion of the open-eyed
sleepwalker.40 The most egregious example of distortion of which I am aware is
a print by the versatile Brandard, which so rejoiced in exaggeration of features
of face, arms, shoulders and waist that the ‘real’ Lind has virtually disappeared;
without including a musical item, in a print that was duplicated for D’Almaine’s
publication Songs from the Note Book of Jenny Lind, probably produced in 1848. A
likely basis for the image of Alboni in ‘Gently Sighs the Breeze’ is the print of her
published in London in December 1847 by E. Sidebetham. The British Library
catalogue proposes 1849 as the year of publication of the duet. The illustrator for
‘Farewell My Fatherland (Lebe wohl mein Vaterland)’ was F. Sexton. ‘Gantier’ was
probably Charles William Glover.
38 Concerning this process, see Biddlecombe, ‘The Construction of a Cultural Icon’,
pp. 47, 55–6.
39 Perry, The First Actresses, p. 27.
40 For an example of an illustration showing Lind as Maria in Donizetti’s opera, see
Charles Jefferys’s publication of The Songs in La Figlia del Reggimento (London:
C. Jefferys, [1848]). This also exemplifies an approach to the issue of language: it
included words in both Italian and English. According to the title page, the Italian
version was as sung by Lind, while the English version was produced by Jefferys
and was sung by the English soprano Miss Rebecca Isaacs. No doubt Jefferys
viewed this as a further means of appealing to the purchasing public.
Figure 4.5
John Brandard, colour
lithographic print of
Jenny Lind as Amina in
La sonnambula [1848]
[© Victoria and Albert
Museum, London]
she has become subsumed into a multiple fictionalization that constitutes a new
construction of her, recognizable only as a refashioning of a previous level of
fictionalization (Fig. 4.5). That Brandard went to such lengths is itself a measure
of the competition that he faced. The Victoria and Albert Collection, for example,
has eleven commercial images of Lind in La sonnambula, including piano
music as well as prints and vocal publications. When taken with his images of
ballet dancers, such as Carlotta Grisi (1844), Brandard’s idealizations of physical
appearance may have been viewed as models of bodily perfection that many
women sought to emulate. Only those able to see Lind close-up in the flesh would
have been able to assess the stark contrast with reality, more truthfully pictured
in a small pencilled drawing, probably a private sketch, by the leading artist
Daniel Maclise. In a view apparently taken from the wings of the opera stage,
Lind is shown in her La sonnambula costume (Fig. 4.6). The large, wide-spread
eyes, sizeable nose and round chin confirm that, of the numerous portraits in
circulation, Magnus’s was closest to the truth.41 In sum, the variety of approaches
adopted by illustrators of the ‘Swedish Nightingale’ highlights the extent to
which images of Lind had become a locus classicus of the coexisting priorities
of ‘high-art’ portraitists and commercial artists, and of their decisions to stress
indications of personal character or physical appeal.
41 The conductor shown here is doubtless Balfe. The presence of the prompter is
another interesting point.
42 For discussions of the ballad see, for example, Biddlecombe, English Opera,
pp. 36–42, 111–14; Derek B. Scott, ‘Music, Morality and Rational Amusement at
the Victorian Middle-Class Soirée’, Music and Performance Culture in Nineteenth-
Century Britain, pp. 83–101.
bounds. The nature of the music would have ruled out extravagant gestures
during performance; instead, it behoved the performer to make manifest the
emotion of the song without overt attention-seeking. Metaphorically, here was
a statement of a cultural ideal. The genre epitomized the esteem given to the
expression of emotion perceived as all the more genuine because it combined
personal restraint with an acceptance of convention. Exaggeration was eschewed
in favour of decorum. Clearly this was in stark contrast to the illustrations on
numerous title pages, prone, as we have seen, to embellishment. Yet, far from
being considered incongruous, the two elements of imagery and music were
evidently regarded as compatible. Indeed, they were in a symbiotic relationship,
for the aura of heightened feminine attractiveness in the one was complemented
by the expression of rectitude of character in the other. There was a significant
inference to be drawn: behind great beauty could lie admirable personal qualities.
Here was a counterbalance to suspicions that female attractiveness could be mere
meretricious glitter, deployed to ensnare the unwary male.
The textual tone of the ballad was crucial for its effect. The subject matter dealt
with issues dear to the heart of the middle classes.43 These included the prizing of
middle-class domesticity over aristocratic surroundings and wealth (‘Home Sweet
Home’; ‘I Dreamt I Dwelt in Marble Halls’); empathy for those demonstrating
loyalty in love (‘When Other Lips’); or, as in ‘The Lonely Rose’, sadness on
account of a young future bride whose life is cut short – which cannot have been
an infrequent occurrence. Given the references made above to this particular
ballad, its text may be quoted as an example. The avoidance of histrionic resource
increases the reflective, restrained, emotional charge, while the allusions
to a village environment (far from the bustle of a great city: again, a potent
idealization) and pure Nature conjure up a life of quiet dignity and impeccable
morality:
A rose gaz’d from her bower green
upon the summer light
And never had creation seen
a flow’r so fair and bright.
Her modest form so soft so meek
with morning radiance dy’d
Beam’d like the lovely blushing cheek
of some young village bride.
But soon a storm, dark o’er the vale,
its mournful fury shed
And shrouded in the twilight pale
the lonely rose lay dead.
44 The genre could accommodate lighter-hearted elements. Desmond Ryan’s text for
Balfe’s ‘The First Kiss’, published by Boosey & Sons in 1856 with an illustrated title
page showing two lovers in a moonlit setting (apparently Mediterranean), relays
the male lover’s recollection of his beloved’s words, which include the memorable
phrase ‘If mama could only see me, Holy saint, what would she say.’
45 See MW 25, 12 January 1850, p. 22. That this required a sidestepping of issues of
national identity (emphasized by the fact that Balfe and Moore were Irish) itself
highlights the importance of the nationalist factor. Scots could point to their own
repertoire of ‘national’ songs; the Scottish melody ‘Comin Through the Rye’, with
words by Robert Burns, was described by a Scottish critic as ‘one of our most
popular national ditties’ (MW, 19 January 1850, pp. 41–2). A different category of
songs written by British composers, published in The British Vocal Album between
1841 and 1851 and ‘surely intended to emulate the German “Lied”’, is discussed by
Peter Horton in ‘The British Vocal Album and the Struggle for National Music’,
Music and Performance Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain, pp. 195–219, at
p. 195.
46 Regarding vocal virtuosity, see, for example, Marguerite Gardiner, Countess of
Blessington, The Two Friends, 3 vols (London: Saunders and Otley, 1835), vol. 1,
p. 87; Weliver, Women Musicians, pp. 34–6. See also Simon McVeigh, Concert Life
in London from Mozart to Haydn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993),
pp. 144–8.
47 Two examples are Dibdin’s enduringly popular song ‘Tom Bowling’ and the
description of Lord Heatherfield in the Countess of Blessington’s novel The Two
Friends, vol. 1, p. 29. See also John Tosh, ‘Gentlemanly Politeness and Manly
Simplicity in Victorian England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, sixth
series, 12 (2002), 455–72. I am grateful to Alice Jenkins for further information
regarding simplicity within Victorian culture.
whose anonymous author fused simplicity with sincerity and national character
when lauding ‘an English ballad’ as ‘breathing of simple, pure affections, and all
that language of the heart which touches in prose or poetry’.48
Even when measured against her performances of other repertoires, the
reception Lind gained from singing ballads was extraordinary. In London,
according to the Musical World, it was her performance of ‘The Lonely Rose’ that
most excited the capacity audience attending Balfe’s 1849 Exeter Hall concert
(‘the sensation she produced exceeded that of any of her previous efforts [in
the concert]’); and the Times reviewer explained that this was due to the sense
of unaffected sincerity generated by her rendition. Indeed, the critic remarked
on this before referring to her technique: ‘Nothing could be more perfect than
Mademoiselle Lind’s singing of this ballad: there was thorough intensity of feeling,
without one particle of exaggerated sentiment, and a purity of intonation that was
absolutely enchanting.’ 49
Among the ballads sung by Lind, and, indeed, by many other singers both
amateur and professional, Sir Henry Bishop’s ‘Home Sweet Home’ deserves
special comment. No song was a more effective expression of the contemporary
reverence for domesticity and family. The anecdotal possibility that Donizetti
obtained the melody, which he incorporated into Anna Bolena, from an English
aristocratic lady (via the prima donna Giuditta Pasta) not only reinforces its
extraordinary status in the history of song; by pointing to its reception in a wide
range of cultural habitus it highlights the fact that the ballad genre straddled
boundaries of class as well as of nationality.50
48 Regarding Moore, see MW, 3 November 1837, p. 128. Regarding ‘The Lonely Rose’,
see n. 12 above. Regarding ‘Memoir of a Song’, see Fraser’s Magazine 39 (January
1849), 17–28; for a commentary and transcription, see Hilary Poriss, Changing the
Score: Arias, Prima Donnas, and the Authority of Performance (New York: Oxford
University Press, 2009), pp. 169–203; p. 200 for the quotations here.
49 See citations in n. 12 above.
50 See William Ashbrook, Donizetti and his Operas (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1982), pp. 693–4. One of many examples of instrumentalists’
exploitation of the ballad is Sigismond Thalberg’s Home, Sweet Home, Air Anglais,
Varié pour le Piano, Op. 72 (London: Cramer, Beale & Chappell, [1857]). Regarding
‘habitus’, see, for example, Bourdieu, Distinction, pp. 165–7.
51 Regarding Barnum, see, for instance, Struggles and Triumphs, or, Forty Years’
Recollections of P. T. Barnum (Buffalo, NY: Courier, 1888); W. Porter Ware and
Thaddeus C. Lockard, P. T. Barnum Presents Jenny Lind: The American Tour of
the Swedish Nightingale (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980);
neglect their own personal interests. See ibid., pp. 9–11, and Waksman, ‘Selling the
Nightingale’, p. 111.
56 See Porter Ware and Lockard, P. T. Barnum Presents, pp. 20 and 31. The exchange
rate is as used by Barnum in his contract with Lind dated 9 January 1850 (ibid.,
p. 179). To investigate the broader implications of this difference in prices would
involve a study of further comparative economic factors lying beyond the scope of
the present chapter.
57 See Waksman, ‘Selling the Nightingale’, p. 118; Porter Ware and Lockard, P. T.
Barnum Presents, p. 20. Regarding Lind’s charitable donations in America, see
Charles G. Rosenberg, Jenny Lind in America (New York: Stringer & Townsend,
1851; reprinted, Boat of Garten, Invernessshire: Read Books Design, 2011), pp. 79,
102, 189, 211, 223. According to Barnum’s calculations, Lind received $176,675.09
from the ninety-five concerts she gave while in association with him, and he
gained $535,486.25 (Porter Ware and Lockard, P. T. Barnum Presents, p. 185).
Figure 4.7
Napoleon Sarony,
lithographic title page
of ‘Lonely I Wander’
(New York: Firth Pond
& Co. / Jollie, 1850),
showing Jenny Lind,
the baritone Giovanni
Belletti (top left) and
the composer and
pianist Julius Benedict
(top right)
[Courtesy of The
Library of Congress,
Music Division]
58 The riot occurred on 10 May 1849 at Astor Opera House; the deadliest municipal
disturbance to date in New York, it left at least twenty-five people dead and dozens
Figure 4.8
Napoleon Sarony,
lithographic title
page of ‘Jenny Lind’s
Greeting to America’,
song by Julius
Benedict (New York:
Firth Pond & Co. /
S. C. Jollie, 1850)
[Courtesy of The
Library of Congress,
Music Division]
injured. See Nigel Cliff, The Shakespeare Riots: Revenge, Drama, and Death in
Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Random House, 2007).
59 Waksman, ‘Selling the Nightingale’, pp. 116, 109, 114–15, and Levine, Highbrow/
Lowbrow, p. 108. The Astor Place Riot had generated claims that there were deep
social antagonisms between ‘the aristocrats of this city [New York] against [sic]
the working classes’ (cited in ibid, p. 65). For a list of songs with which Lind was
associated, see Porter Ware and Lockard, P. T. Barnum Presents, pp. 53–4.
60 Levine, Highbrow/Lowbrow, p. 108. Presumably Levine’s justification for the
description of ‘Home Sweet Home’ as ‘American’ was that the text of the song was
sung only as Jenny Lind can sing it. It was inimitable. We have heard this
melody on many occasions, but never before as it ought to be given. It was,
of course, encored. There was a degree of soul thrown into it, such as we
never before listened to. It was soul itself embodied in song.61
Here is an instance, in Susan Rutherford’s words, of the ‘notion that women’s
singing was an almost infallible guide to their internal selves’. We may also
note that, whether or not this view could be applied to male singers, here it
intertwined a coded statement of Lind’s moral superiority over other vocalists
(the corollary was that the better the performance, the better the person) with an
implied further justification for the esteem accorded to the ballad, as a genre, by
contemporary society: it shared with Magnus’s portrait the capacity to facilitate
the revealing of an individual’s character.62
But, comparably with Lind’s imagery, a distinctively American dimension
arose from songs she selected for concert performance that had a strongly
nationalist cachet. In addition to Benedict’s ‘Jenny Lind’s Greeting to America’
(set in far more militaristic style than would suit a ballad)63 came ‘Hail Columbia’,
which Lind first sang in Washington, D.C., in a concert attended by President
Millard Fillmore, on 18 December 1850.64 Such apparent support for American
ideology was seized upon by the upholders of anti-European nationalism. Prima
donnas had long paid respect to a host nation by singing what may be termed
national anthems. In Britain, Lind herself had sung ‘God Save the Queen’ – all
the more telling at a time when Europe was recoiling from deep political turmoil –
but now an American critic, writing for the Washington newspaper the Daily
Union, identified the soprano as
the representative in Europe of republican virtues. Titled vice has
felt abashed before their pure lustre; and hereditary rank, tricked off with
garters and ribands, has been made to give place to a superior nobility.65
In London, the Musical World denounced these lines as written by a ‘swaggering
booby’ and angrily rejected claims to the moral highground from a nation
in which slavery was still practised. Strikingly avoided is the question of how
written by the American John Howard Payne during the time he spent in London.
61 Baltimore Sun, 12 December 1850, quoted in MW, 4 January 1851, p. 9.
62 See Susan Rutherford, The Prima Donna and Opera, 1815–1930 (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 54. As Rutherford notes, the aesthetic
argument was influenced by the work of the Swiss physiognomist Johann Lavater.
63 The performance direction ‘Allegro marziale con spirito’ leaves no doubt as to
Benedict’s appraisal of the American public mood. William Hall & Son’s rival
publication was ‘Jenny Lind’s Salutation to America’, with music by the conductor
Maurice Strakosch, later the brother-in-law and mentor of the soprano Adelina
Patti.
64 The programme also included ballads: ‘Home Sweet Home’ and Benedict’s ‘Take
This Lute’. See Porter Ware and Lockard, P. T. Barnum Presents, p. 54.
65 Daily Union, 17 [?] December 1850, quoted in MW, 11 January 1851, p. 22. The
writer evidently linked ‘pure lustre’ and ‘nobility’ with ‘republican virtues’.
conscious Lind was that her actions might have been utilized for ideological
purposes. In Britain, she was probably shielded from charges of complicity
by the affection that she had already garnered thanks to her well-publicized
identification with British values.66
We should remember that in neither country was Lind the only singer to
include ballads in concert programmes. In 1850, others ranged from Anna Bishop
(the estranged wife of Sir Henry Bishop, ironically the composer of ‘Home Sweet
Home’), then also appearing in America, to the ‘pretty foreign warbler’ Jetty
Treffz, from Vienna, touring Britain that year.67 However, we should not overlook
the complicating case of Lind’s great Italian rival, Giulia Grisi. Intensely admired
as a performer, Grisi was at least reported as philanthropic, and criticism of her
chequered private life was countered by staunch support from many admirers,
including Queen Victoria.68 But while she was named and illustrated on English
publications of Italian operatic items, and therefore had a certain presence in
the domestic ethos, she was never, as far as I am aware, linked to publications of
English-language song. Indeed, it appears that she avoided performing the genre
for much of her career.69 This is a reminder of the complexity of public attitudes
towards prima donnas, but it also suggests a particular consequence: combined
66 MW, 11 January 1851, p. 23. Regarding Lind’s singing ‘God Save the Queen’, see, for
example, Holland and Rockstro, Memoir, vol. 2, pp. 264–5. On the recruitment
of the figure of Lind for pro-American ideology, see Parke Godwin, Vala: A
Mythological Tale (New York: George P. Putnam, 1851), particularly sections VII
and VIII; Lowell Gallagher, ‘Jenny Lind and the Voice of America’, En Travesti:
Women, Gender Subversion, Opera, ed. Corinne E. Blackmer and Patricia Juliana
Smith (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 190–215, especially
pp. 204–11.
67 Treffz was praised in Scotland for the ‘sympathy’ (for which we may read fellow-
feeling) and ‘compliment to our nationality’ that she demonstrated in mastering
‘our Scottish melody and dialect’ when singing ‘Comin Through the Rye’ in
addition to ballads including ‘Home Sweet Home’. See MW, 19 January 1850,
pp. 41–2. Treffz also sang German-language songs, making this her individual
‘signature’ repertoire – the equivalent of Lind’s Scandinavian songs. Treffz’s general
success again reflects the importance of a shrewd manager, in this case the French
conductor Louis-Antoine Jullien, who spent much of his career in Britain.
68 In 1838, Grisi became the subject of considerable publicity when a duel was fought
in London between her husband Gérard de Melcy and the English aristocrat
Viscount Castlereagh. Grisi separated from de Melcy and later gave birth to
Castlereagh’s son. In 1841, she began a life-long relationship with the tenor
Giovanni Mario; they never married, but had three children together.
69 Possibly Grisi felt the songs were beneath her dignity. Her change of heart, late in
her career, may have been a reaction to the popularity garnered by her new rival,
the young Adelina Patti, who included ‘Home Sweet Home’ in her repertoire with
gusto. Grisi’s song repertoire appears to have consisted of ‘Home Sweet Home’ and
‘The Minstrel Boy’, a setting of words by Thomas Moore. According to Mrs. E. M.
Ward (Memories of Ninety Years [London: Hutchinson, [1924]], p. 213), certainly
her performance of the latter was highly acclaimed, which suggests mastery of
‘singing’ English.
with the ‘foreignness’ of her operatic repertoire, the sense of distance from society
arising from Grisi’s disconnection from all that the English song repertoire
symbolized may have contributed to her being considered a ‘diva’, with its
implication of separateness. By contrast, I have not found the term ‘diva’ applied
to Lind. Thus the use of this concept may have been at least partially linked to the
issues here under discussion.70
Lind’s espousal of English-language song had special impact as a consequence
of her immense general reputation. We may now see the importance of this
repertoire in cementing that esteem. That its role has been allowed to fall from
sight may be attributed to the stance of her Victorian hagiographers Holland and
Rockstro, for whom finessing anything they considered not befitting the lofty
‘Art-Life’ of an ‘Artist’ was a priority when writing their influential biography of
1891. They insisted that ‘the long-enduring love [sic]’ felt for Lind ‘was won in
the concert room, and at the Oratorio’, and that it was by means of the repertoire
she selected for such purposes that ‘the beloved “Swedish Nightingale” sang her
way into the great heart of the British people’. In this they accorded an important
place to her Swedish songs,71 with their charm of untroubling foreignness plus
their ability to convey a sense of her loyalty to her homeland and its people; but
they completely omitted English song from the record.72 The reason probably
lies in the fall in critical estimation of the mid-century ballad style, regarded
by the time of the biography, as unduly sentimental. Yet it is surely evident that
Lind’s performances of this body of music were also key to the extraordinarily
widespread affection that was felt for her. Here was proof of her wish to enter,
and put herself on a plane with, the musical world of the Victorian public at
large. Likewise, the use of the English language was more than a means of direct
communication: it was another sign of her wish to integrate into British society.73
70 Marvin (‘Idealizing the Prima Donna’, p. 36) and Rutherford (The Prima Donna
and Opera, pp. 31–2) have likewise drawn attention to the complexity inherent in
Grisi’s reputation. Regarding Grisi as a ‘diva’, see Rachel Cowgill and Hilary Poriss,
‘Introduction’, and James Q. Davies, ‘Gautier’s “Diva”: The First French Uses of the
Word’, both in The Arts of the Prima Donna, pp. xxxii–xxxiii and pp. 123–46 (at
pp. 131–8), respectively. Perry discusses prior use of the term in The First Actresses,
pp. 87–93.
71 Lind had been associated with Swedish song from shortly after her arrival in
Britain on 17 April 1847: an illustrated biographical article published in the ILN, 24
April 1847 (p. 272), incorporated what purported to be a Swedish song composed
by her. (This had previously appeared in a Viennese publication; see Biddlecombe,
‘The Construction of a Cultural Icon’, n. 6.) She frequently included Swedish songs
and at least one Norwegian song in her concerts, accompanying herself at the
piano. See, for example, Holland and Rockstro, Memoir, vol. 2, pp. 152, 153, 163, 167,
421–2; and pp. 21–4 of ‘Appendix of Music’, where the ‘Norwegian Echo Song’ is
described as ‘a wild original piece of National Music’.
72 Holland and Rockstro, Memoir, title page; vol. 2, pp. 106, 155. They made no
reference to ‘The Lonely Rose’. Indeed, they referred to Balfe, as a composer, solely
as having written an Italian operatic aria for Lind (vol. 2, p. 166).
73 A sign of the importance of her singing in English is that an ‘unfavourable
impression’ was created when she sang an aria from Haydn’s Creation in German
Clearly the latter points also applied to Scottish songs that she sang, such as
‘Comin Through the Rye’ and ‘John Anderson, My Jo’. But the ballad occupied
a different cultural place than the Scottish repertoire as a result of all that was
signified by its musical style, the tone of its texts and, in England, its nationalist
overtones. Just as oratorio provided Lind with a means of expressing a religious
conviction shared by many, her ballad performances could be taken as a shared
profession of faith in prized cultural tenets. In Britain, by identifying herself with
the simplicity – equated with sincerity – of the genre, she also identified herself
with a source of national pride, strengthened by the belief that performance
revealed the character of the performer. In America, this perception, along with
suitably adapted imagery, was co-opted to link her with a contrasting national
pride that recruited her for a different nationalist cause. Whether, or how far,
Lind here compromised her own political views is unknown. She was well aware
of the cautionary example of the German soprano Wilhelmine Schröder-Devrient,
who encountered strident opprobrium due to her unpopular political stance
in Germany in 1849, and she would have seen strong reason to avoid bringing
similar antagonism upon herself.74
Sheet music (and its illustrations) was another subject Holland and Rockstro
avoided, though they did reproduce Magnus’s portrait and various prints, under
the watchful eye of Lind’s husband, Otto Goldschmidt.75 Sheet music involved
as opposed to English (ibid., vol. 2, p. 166). Holland and Rockstro considered that
her ‘singing’ English was better than her spoken English (ibid., vol. 2, p. 246n.). See
also the praise for her pronunciation in the Times’s review of her performance
of ‘The Lonely Rose’ (cited in n. 12 above). Lind’s wish to involve herself in British
society became clear during her first years in the country. In addition to giving
support to various charitable organizations (including, from 1848 onwards, the
Mendelssohn Scholarship Foundation), she developed strong links with prominent
personalities ranging from, for example, the Bishop of Norwich to Harriet Grote,
the wife of the politician and historian George Grote. In 1858, Lind and her
husband, Otto Goldschmidt, whom she had married in 1852, established their
home in London, and in 1861, Goldschmidt became a naturalized British subject,
by virtue of which Lind, too, became a British subject. Their three children were
raised in Britain. Lind continued to enjoy the support of Queen Victoria after she
withdrew from the stage in 1849: for example, in 1863 she sang during the marriage
of the Prince of Wales to Princess Alexandra of Denmark. Regarding Lind’s and
Goldschmidt’s social and musical standing and the later status of their children,
see George Biddlecombe, ‘Secret Letters and a Missing Memorandum: New Light
on the Personal Relationship between Felix Mendelssohn and Jenny Lind’, JRMA
138 (2013), 47–83, at pp. 73, 75, 77, 80.
74 On 14 July 1849, Lind wrote from Schlangenbad to her friend Charlotte Birch-
Pfeiffer that Schröder-Devrient ‘has left an unenviable reputation here, for people
claim that she gave a very disagreeable political speech, after which she had to
leave’; see Porter Ware and Lockard, P. T. Barnum Presents, p. 169.
75 See Holland and Rockstro, Memoir, vol. 1, frontispiece, and vol. 2, pp. 25, 72,
95, 198. Holland and Rockstro did not, for instance, mention sheet-music
imagery when alluding to commercial illustrations of Lind. A reason for this,
and likewise for their decision to draw a veil over Lind’s singing ballads, may
the ballad, now artistically suspect, as well as the commercialism from which the
authors strove to disassociate Lind. But in the United Kingdom and in the United
States sheet-music illustrations had played an important role in presenting her
as an embodiment of the ‘ideals both of femininity and cultural nationalism’, to
borrow a phrase from Deborah Rohr.76 Just as her philanthropy helped to counter
the notion that prima donnas, untouched by magnanimity, were fixated on
amassing grand fortunes, her imagery promoted acceptance of the principle that
outstanding artistic ability, identification with cultural values, unimpeachable
morality, and physical attractiveness were all compatible in contemporary
domestic womanhood. Thus, along with her espousal of the ballad, with its strong
implicit support for culturally important values, not only did Lind’s imagery
encourage the development of a positive attitude towards prima donnas as a
group; it represented a significant contribution to Victorian and, indeed, later
British and American society.
have been a perception that such imagery and music would not appeal to the
aesthetic judgment of ‘the cultivated mind […] the man of taste […] the artist’,
categories within which they clearly placed themselves, Otto Goldschmidt and,
by implication, their readership. (They referred to one example of ephemera
expressing acclaim for Lind as ‘execrable nonsense’. ) See ibid., vol. 2, pp. 81–2, 111,
112. Separately, their lack of reference to L’ Allemand’s portrait, as opposed to their
discussions of Magnus’s, suggests that Lind preferred the latter (as noted above,
it was Magnus’s, not L’ Allemand’s, that Goldschmidt had copied: see pp. 93–4).
Regarding Goldschmidt’s influence over Holland and Rockstro’s biography, see
Biddlecombe, ‘Secret Letters’, p. 78.
76 Rohr, The Careers of British Musicians, p. 12.
I n one of his most famous essays about Richard Wagner, Ernst Bloch notes
the ways in which Wagner’s works are filled with paradox.1 For example,
Beckmesser, the character in Die Meistersinger we are supposed to root against,
has the most progressive music. Commenting on Beckmesser’s corruption
of Walther’s Preislied text, Bloch remarks: ‘Much of it reminds one of what the
philistine likes to call “degenerate”. […] It is presented with disdain by Wagner,
and yet it is like a preview of Dadaism.’2 Talking about the things that ‘surprise’ in
Wagner, elsewhere Bloch writes:
we find right next to Walther’s Prize Song […] nothing less than the music
of Beckmesser […] above all the music for his pantomime […] which is
one of the finest and most daring parts of the Mastersingers. […] It is
significantly more ‘modern’ and is swimming significantly more against the
traditional current than is Walther’s Prize Song. This is a mistake from a
dramaturgical angle, but musically it is a decided paradox.3
In other words, Wagner, who billed himself as the progressive creator of the
‘artwork of the future’, casts his vote against Beckmesser, the character in the
opera who is discursively the conservative but aesthetically the progressive.
Hans Mayer echoes Bloch with similarly paradoxical examples from Wagner’s
biography: ‘With the late Wagner everything is still simultaneous: Young German
enthusiast of a liberated sensuality and chaste knight of the Grail; destroyer of all
bourgeois institutions and their beneficiary; Friend of Bakunin in unquenchable
admiration and apparent friend of Ludwig II; denouncer of the ownership of
palaces and lord of Wahnfried.’4 Wagner had railed against animal cruelty when
114
he saw a goose liver pâté for sale in a shop window, but then bought one as a
birthday gift for his Bayreuth banker friend Friedrich Feustel.
A similar paradox seems to involve the ways in which Wagner responded to
the newly changing circumstances of musical composition and performance in
the early to mid nineteenth century. On the one hand, as I have argued in detail
elsewhere, he marketed himself as a celebrity and branded his works as products
that were in a category of their own; that is, under no circumstances were they
‘operas’ or to be referred to as such.5 At the same time, he viciously attacked any
and all of his contemporaries who were similarly engaged in marketing, especially
if he could accuse them of being overtly in concert with the requirements of what
he, already in 1841, had termed the music ‘industry’. 6 At different stages in his
career, this included Meyerbeer, Halévy, Rossini, Mendelssohn, Berlioz and even
his later stalwart champion and financial supporter, Franz Liszt.
At odds here, or at least, seemingly at odds, were two diametrically opposed
tendencies. One was grounded in the development of what economists call
the free market, which presumes a large consumer base and offers products
for purchase with a view to maximising profit. In the field of music production,
this is a shift that becomes especially noticeable in the nineteenth century. This
gradually replaced the earlier practice of what I will call the single consumer – i.e.
a wealthy and usually aristocratic patron, or an institution like the Church – who
would commission the composition and arrange for the performance of a musical
work, or, more efficiently, simply have the composer/performer on the payroll. In
the nineteenth century, consumers – plural – anonymous and individually with
lesser financial resources, but as a group displaying enormous purchasing power,
would eventually replace the old model. In the twentieth century, this practice
would grow into the phenomenon that cultural theorists would term mass culture,
which is not any single cultural phenomenon in particular, with the exception
that, from a fiscal point of view, it deals in artistic products that are profitable for
the producers, distributors and others on the supply side of the economic divide.
Of course not all art is profitable, and that is as it should be. In fact, artworks
that do not cater to the whims of the masses and to the cold calculation of the
marketplace might be even more worthwhile. At least, this is the argument that
came to be formulated already in the eighteenth century in response to the
exploding book industry. As Martha Woodmansee argued twenty years ago, the
idea of the ‘autonomous artwork’ – meaning the artwork that is not beholden
to meta-artistic considerations, such as politics, ideology or economics – was
a concept formulated by German thinkers and in the first place as a response
to the new primacy of the marketplace.7 Indeed, as she argues, these authors
needed to devise a means of justifying why their works did not sell. Either way,
they claimed that true art, genuine art, was not created with a view to profit. In
a reverse argument, popular hence profitable art was a sure sign of its aesthetic
inferiority, its creation based on economic calculation and catering to the lowest
common denominator. This rhetorical position, theorized most powerfully by
Immanuel Kant, brought serious, disinterested art (except music) into proximity
with religion.8
More recently, James Garratt has revisited the issue of the autonomous
art discourse in nineteenth-century Europe.9 Garratt is motivated by the
seeming paradox that the practitioners of aesthetic autonomy – defined as ‘art’s
detachment from social and political concerns’ – nevertheless devoted ‘so much
attention to social reform’. 10 In the end, Garratt’s exploration of the discourse
of aesthetic autonomy covers much more ground, but his essential argument is
that the supposed incompatibility between aesthetic autonomy and an art that is
socially engaged is based on a false dichotomy. Garratt is right to warn against
false dichotomies, as Andreas Huyssen argued persuasively in 1986, when he
showed not only that the boundaries of the supposed ‘great divide’ between
high and low culture are extremely difficult to define, but also that the concept
itself is little more than a rhetorical strategy.11 Similarly, Garratt indicts previous
scholarship which has tended to view the ‘musical culture and discourse of
nineteenth-century Germany […] through the lens of an all-pervading binary’.12
Instead, he proposes to examine how aesthetic autonomy ‘represents a single
solution to a set of overlapping problems’.13 Garratt does fleetingly mention the
theories of aesthetic autonomy which ‘seek to justify and safeguard art’s right to
independence from extrinsic forces, whether absolutist control or the demands
of the market’, 14 but he never again mentions the mass music market and instead
remains trapped inside a limited and limiting academic discourse.15
7 Martha Woodmansee, The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of
Aesthetics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).
8 Celia Applegate traces a similar development in eighteenth-century Germany, but
with specific focus on the discourse of music aesthetics; see her Bach in Berlin:
Nation and Culture in Mendelssohn’s Revival of the ‘St. Matthew Passion’ (Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press, 2005), chapter 2.
9 James Garratt, Music, Culture and Social Reform in the Age of Wagner (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2010).
10 Ibid., p. 1.
11 Andreas Huyssen, After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture,
Postmodernism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986).
12 Garratt, Music, Culture and Social Reform, p. 9.
13 Ibid., p. 11.
14 Ibid.
15 I dwell, perhaps somewhat unfairly, on Garratt’s study because it is symptomatic
of the continuing approach to issues of music discourse in the nineteenth century.
While Garratt rightly takes issue with ‘our received idea of a mainstream regulated
More to the point, while Garratt warns us about indulging too readily in (false)
binaries, Richard Wagner does nothing less than construct his persona based on
one. However, it is not the binary that Garratt proposes to overcome, nor is it
even simply the ‘high/low’ divide that Huyssen challenges. Rather, it is a balancing
act that Wagner undertakes between two radically different yet contemporaneous
discourses, both of which are central to Wagner’s project and, I would suggest,
to anyone in the last 200 years attempting to ‘make it’ in the world of ‘serious
music’. Even if – as I have argued in my book – Wagner presents a special, if not
unique, case because of the variety of means he used to further his cause and the
persistence he displayed in doing so, he was also in many respects a man of his
time and did little that others around him and even before him had not already
undertaken.16 Wagner, like his nemesis Meyerbeer, not to mention Paganini and
Liszt, all of whom were in Paris, was keenly aware of the changing economics
of musical composition and performance in post-revolutionary Europe at the
dawn of the industrial revolution. Gradually replacing the patronage system of
ecclesiastical or aristocratic sponsors, the general public now had to be courted
because its financial support was increasingly needed for composers to flourish
or even survive. Reaching this public required new strategies which meant, then
as now, using the media. In the nineteenth century, this included print media in
all its different forms: newspapers, journals, posters, flyers, in some cases even
correspondence and telegrams. Today, we use the term ‘publicity’ and there are
agencies with staff specially trained in the art. In the nineteenth century, this
branch of the music and entertainment business was still in its infancy and those
composers who were successful managed their own publicity in most instances.
Wagner did not invent any strategies, but he made himself visible in the
media with a greater variety of materials, with greater consistency, and over
a longer period of time than any of his contemporaries. He was the subject of
countless articles, reviews and opinion pieces, especially after 1850, which are so
numerous that Helmut Kirchmeyer’s multi-decade project to catalogue them all
remains incomplete. In other words, Wagner was the progenitor of most of the
noise about him. This noise began around 1840 in Paris, continued for the rest
of his life and arguably has still not abated, although the content of that noise
has shifted with time. Wagner’s published writings included music criticism and
performance reviews, short stories, theoretical tracts and books, open letters,
pamphlets and flyers. The subjects he covered included music aesthetics, cultural
history, politics, religion and philosophy. Wagner also wrote autobiographies,
a new one approximately every ten years, starting in 1842 when he was not yet
thirty.17 The impact of this perpetual form of self-narration was that Wagner,
through sheer repetition, not only wrote and rewrote his life story as he wanted
it understood, he also managed to control the discourse about his person, a factor
in and a cause for prejudicial colouring of events – and downright falsities –
that linger even today in Wagner scholarship when ideas find themselves
perpetuated often unwittingly by scholars unaware of the original source of the
(mis)information. Wagner also seemed to understand that there was no such
thing as ‘bad’ publicity. So, although he often grumbled and complained about
the bad press he received off and on, he was also the person who fuelled much
of the controversy by making his own highly inflammatory remarks about other
composers or about entire races: that is, his anti-Semitism, which even in the
nineteenth century struck some as being over the top.
But Wagner was also different from most of his contemporaries for another
reason. While Paganini, Meyerbeer and the young Liszt – who were masters at
self-promotion – made no effort to pretend that they were not seeking success
and fame, Wagner was always conscious of the danger that the seriousness of
his project was compromised by the smell of overly overt public relations. At
odds were two sets of competing practices: one of them, a theoretical or even
an ideological discourse that was set against a system of increasingly successful
practices based on the principles of free enterprise. By the mid nineteenth
century, there was already a well-established ‘primary market’ of professional
performances of opera, as well as the ‘secondary market’ of sheet-music sales
targeted to middle-class households with increasing amounts of disposable
income, leisure time and the ability to play musical instruments with moderate
technical aptitude. These markets were different both in kind and scale from
anything that had come before, but closely related in ways that anticipated the
kinds of joint marketing ventures we see today, where products are placed in
big-budget films, or films are released together with products and toys in stores,
each feeding off the other. Already in the nineteenth-century context, no pretence
was made that sales and profit were not actively sought.
At approximately the same historical moment, and emerging in the first place
from Germany, was a conceptualization of art that was similarly responding to
the new emphasis on its potential for monetary success and reward. Rather than
embracing these new economics of the art marketplace, however, this discourse –
possibly also prompted by a combination of the immense success of the natural
sciences and the tangible technological benefits they produced, together with
the waning authority of the Church – argued that true art was an expression
of humanity’s highest aspirations, offering experiences of religious intensity,
transcendental in its reach, and unconcerned with earthly and transitory
considerations of profit and success. Indeed, any artwork whose creation was
geared towards an appeal to the masses and to financial gain was deemed ipso
facto unworthy, its creator despised. This discourse, already well established by
the infancy of German romanticism around 1800, had become a mainstay among
18 See, e.g., Albert Meier, Alessandro Costazza and Gérard Laudin, eds, Kunstreligion:
Ein ästhetisches Konzept der Moderne in seiner historischen Entfaltung, Band 1: Der
Ursprung des Konzepts um 1800 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011).
19 David Gramit, ‘Selling the Serious: The Commodification of Music and Resistance
to It in Germany, circa 1800’, The Musician as Entrepreneur, pp. 81–101, at p. 82.
Later in the essay (p. 90), Gramit formulates this idea even more pointedly when
he talks of ‘the entrepreneurial promotion of the anti-entrepreneurial, of the
marketing of resistance to the market’. See also Celia Applegate, ‘How German Is
It? Nationalism and the Idea of Serious Music in the Early Nineteenth Century’,
19th-Century Music 21 (1998), 274–96; and David Gramit, Cultivating Music: The
Aspirations, Interests, and Limits of German Musical Culture, 1770–1848 (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2002).
20 Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘Nietzsche contra Wagner’, Der Fall Wagner: Schriften,
Aufzeichnungen, Briefe, ed. Dieter Borchmeyer (Frankfurt: Insel, 1983), pp. 130–49,
at p. 139; and Nietzsche, Ecce Homo, section 5, Der Fall Wagner, p. 241.
21 Nietzsche, Der Fall Wagner, Vorwort; English from Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth
of Tragedy and the Case of Wagner, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Vintage,
1967), p. 156.
22 Richard Wagner, ‘Pariser Fatalitäten für Deutsche’, SSD, vol. 12, pp. 44–62, at p. 59.
35 Richard Wagner, Mein Leben, ed. Martin Gregor-Dellin (Munich: List, 1963), p. 184.
See also ibid., p. 219 and p. 431.
36 Ibid., p. 45.
37 Wagner, Der junge Wagner, p. 185.
38 See, e.g., Wagner’s letter to Robert Schumann, 3 January [recte: February] 1842 ; SB,
vol. 1, pp. 573–9.
39 Wagner, Der junge Wagner, p. 274.
40 Gospel According to Matthew, 19.24.
Luther lived what he preached. He condemned publishers for profiting from the
sale of books and presented himself as the model of disinterestedness, selflessly
proclaiming, with regard to his idea, in his ‘Warning to Publishers’ (1541): ‘I
received it for nothing, gave it away for nothing, and seek nothing for it, Christ
my Lord has repaid me for it many hundred thousand times over.’41 Luther’s
status as exemplary German seemed to confirm Tacitus’s observations about the
virtues of the Germanic folk, observations that became crucial in the extended
effort to (re)construct a German national identity during the eighteenth century.
Luther’s status as an iconic figure who did not seek to profit from his creative
work was no less influential.
Although Wagner would surely reap any monetary compensation for his works
that he could – in the case of Der Ring des Nibelungen even selling the rights
on multiple occasions to multiple buyers – his writings perpetuate the national
discourse of disinterest.42 This is perhaps nowhere more evident than in his
pair of novellas originally published in French in Schlesinger’s journal. Initially
titled ‘Une visite à Beethoven, épisode de la vie d’un musicien allemand’ (1840),
the first novella consists solely of a first-person account by a German musician
living in Paris named ‘R’. Its apparent success prompted Schlesinger to offer
another commission.43 The second novella, titled ‘Un musicien étranger à Paris’,
again features R but is narrated by yet another unnamed German musician living
in Paris, who has befriended R. The story recounts R’s final days and includes an
emotional deathbed scene at which the Narrator is present.44 Although the title
‘Un musicien étranger à Paris’ alludes to R, the presence of the Narrator means
that there are now two German musicians in Paris. Even though it is not wise to
identify fictional characters too closely with their authors, aspects of Wagner are
present in both characters. This was neither the only time Wagner would present
an aestheticized version of himself, nor the only time he would divide himself
between two characters: the most notable example being the pairing of the elderly
and experienced Hans Sachs with the youthful and naturally gifted Walther von
Stolzing in Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg. The novellas ‘helped me considerably
in becoming known and noticed in Paris’, Wagner admits shortly thereafter in
41 ‘Warnung an die Drucker von 1541’, Martin Luther, Vermischte deutsche Schriften,
ed. Johann Konrad Irmscher (Frankfurt: Heyder & Zimmer, 1854), vol. 11, p. 6.
42 On a side note, it is interesting to what extent one does not encounter references
to this discourse when reading Meyerbeer’s correspondence or diaries. Given
that he was from Berlin where much of this ideology was generated, was it that he
didn’t think it applied to him, or was he simply not concerned with such issues?
43 On this novella, see Nicholas Vazsonyi, ‘Beethoven Instrumentalized: Richard
Wagner’s Self-Marketing and Media Image’, Music & Letters 89 (2008), 195–211.
44 In 1841, a few months after the French publication, the German original of both
novellas appeared together in the Abend-Zeitung (Dresden), under the collected
title ‘Zwei Epochen aus dem Leben eines deutschen Musikers’ (‘Two Episodes
from the Life of a German Musician’). The first piece, with the religiously loaded
title ‘Eine Pilgerfahrt zu Beethoven’ (‘A Pilgrimage to Beethoven’), was augmented
with an introductory note by the fictitious Narrator, who presents the ‘Pilgrimage’
as one of the writings found among the papers of the recently deceased R.
Haydn and opens up a future beyond Beethoven. Rather than being the end of
the line, Mozart and Beethoven now become founders of a new ‘church’, the
(s)elect, charged with receiving and spreading the Holy Spirit of Music. Like
Christ clearing the money-lenders from the temple, R condemns those who
commodify and thus prostitute music, who dare ‘to profit from lofty chaste
art, which they would defile and dishonour’. 50 R dies, a victim of the newly
commercialized, market-driven middle-class musical culture, martyred for his
faith in the new religion of the German romantics – Music. Deeply moved, the
Narrator beholds the transfigured expression on the face of his now deceased
friend, and ‘prays to God for a similar death’.
Read autobiographically, the novella suggests that Wagner the idealist died in
Paris, leaving only the realist. But this is not autobiography. Wagner the idealist
did not die in Paris; he was created there. Recall that Wagner came to Paris as
a seeker of fame and fortune, not as a believer in Mozart and Beethoven, but
instead wanting to satisfy French taste to secure his success. R – the literary
creation – dies on the printed page but is resurrected as Wagner’s public persona.
This is the mask behind which Wagner scripts and narrates the drama that
became his public life – a persona designed to elicit sympathy, to achieve moral
victory, to proclaim a cause, but all the while engaging actively in the realities
of the new commercial world, first by engineering an almost permanent media
presence, and ultimately by creating an edifice and annual event exclusively
dedicated to his art.
In his autobiography, Wagner presents his novelistic work lightheartedly,
as if to suggest that it was of little consequence, at most an opportunity to take
‘revenge’ both against specific persons and against an entire establishment and
system of practices that denied him even the chance at entry.51 But these works
are much more than an exposé of superficial Parisian life or a mere exercise in
short-term revenge. If we take Wagner’s confession seriously, revenge is the
motivation for his entire subsequent endeavour. As Katharine Ellis and Matthias
Brzoska point out, of those who failed in Paris, Wagner ‘remains the only one
who made a career by constructing his little Paris [‘petit Paris’] outside of France
but nevertheless peopled by the Parisian elite’. 52 A true, yet misleading, statement.
Wagner’s ‘little Paris’, i.e. Bayreuth, was designed to stand for the opposite of
Paris: far from being a ‘little Paris’, Bayreuth is its inverse.
But the ongoing image of Wagner’s ‘failure in Paris’ is perhaps another
misleading mainstay of the Wagner story. According to Ernest Newman,
Wagner failed in Paris because he ‘forgot that there was a business side to art’,53
a rationale many Wagner biographers echo. But I think Newman gets it exactly
wrong, since Wagner went to Paris explicitly for business reasons: ‘money was
his goal’.54 Money and profit were the primary motivators for Wagner’s journey
to Paris. He had long hoped that in Paris he would achieve his big break as a
composer, become ‘rich and famous’ and ‘no longer be a German philistine’,
dreams he unabashedly announced to his friend Theodor Apel in 1834.55 If
Wagner launched his mature career in 1840–41 with a series of writings on the
largely German struggle to preserve and further the cause of true art against its
impoverishment in the French capital under the aegis of popularity, commerce,
money – primarily that of expatriate German Jewish bankers – and profit, he
would return to exactly these themes again at the end of his life. In the interim, he
had gone from being an unknown, struggling artist to being the most discussed
German composer since Beethoven and creator of the monumental Ring des
Nibelungen, performed at the specially constructed Festival Theatre in Bayreuth
in 1876. This was surely the musical event of the century, a century filled with
musical ‘events’. While Wagner was admittedly still beset by financial woes,
after 1876 he was settled in his villa Wahnfried, a figure of the establishment
and personally funded by Ludwig II.56 If revenge had been a motivator in 1840–
41, this could hardly have been the reason for the reanimated series of attacks
following 1876. Instead, in the years since 1840, the significance and the reach
of the commercial world – including its musical dimension – had only grown,
endangering the very notion of art music (not unlike the constant reminders
nowadays that the Humanities as such are imperilled). Wagner was angry.
In the essay ‘Modern’, published in 1878 in one of the first issues of his
house journal, the Bayreuther Blätter, Wagner inveighs with redoubled forces
against the ‘modern’, by which he means ‘a very shady thing, most perilous to us
Germans in particular’.57 Again, it is about people who ‘went to Paris’ and were
‘well supported by the power of the purse’, which, later, Wagner refers to as ‘the
modern Jew-world’s victory’, resulting from the combination of the primacy
of money and what Wagner calls ‘the perpetual contagion of Jewish journalism’.
The ‘Frenchman can call himself “modern” with a peculiar pride, for he makes the
Mode, and thereby rules the whole world’s exterior.’58 While ‘Modern’ inveighs
53 Ernest Newman, The Life of Richard Wagner, 4 vols (London: Cassell, 1976), vol. 1,
p. 269.
54 Robert Gutman, Richard Wagner: The Man, His Mind, and His Music (New York:
Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968), p. 69.
55 Letter to Theodor Apel, 27 October 1834, SB, vol. 1, pp. 167–8.
56 I will not discuss here the details of Wagner’s own efforts, and the efforts of his
closest allies, to brand and market his works between 1840 and 1876, since this is
the topic of my 2010 book, Richard Wagner, see n. 5 above.
57 Richard Wagner, ‘Modern’, Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton
Ellis, 8 vols (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1892–99), vol. 6, pp. 43–9, at
p. 46.
58 Ibid.
against ‘modernity’ in general with the French and the Jews both as culprits
and as profiteers, Wagner’s next essay, ‘Public and Popularity’ (‘Publikum und
Popularität’, 1878), which appeared in three instalments in the Bayreuther Blätter,
takes much sharper aim at the entertainment industry. Wagner mentions music
only in passing, because his main target is how the machinery of the culture
industry (my term, not his) functions to steer the public towards mediocrity. The
prime culprit this time is journalism which, interestingly, is no longer the product
of Jewish interests, but rather a Europe-wide development, afflicting culture
as much in Germany as in France. In this sense, here Wagner is much more on
target in his understanding of the pervasiveness of modernity and modern
processes as inter- and transnational, though he does not miss the opportunity to
besmirch both the French and Rossini as successful peddlers of mediocrity.
Wagner’s essential question is this: how do we go about defining what is meant
by the ‘public’ and assessing what is ‘popular’? He starts out by conceding that
sheer numbers provide a powerful argument for defining these concepts given
the exigencies of the new economic imperative: his example is the hugely popular
German-language journal Die Gartenlaube with its half million subscribers – in
German nineteenth-century terms, a massive circulation. But then he offers
individual examples of Die Gartenlaube readers who have written letters to him
or whom he knows personally, and whose responses to his work differ from those
presented in the journal. These, as well as other personal anecdotes, suggest that
while numbers can convey a general impression, they are unable to pinpoint
responses to culture on the level of actual people. Wagner quotes the editors
of Die Gartenlaube explaining their decisions to print and not to print certain
material ‘in the interests of their public’, in other words based on assumptions
about what their readership will and will not want to read – a number-crunching
and commercially oriented mentality that has become the norm but that Wagner
wants to resist, at least rhetorically.
On the face of it, Wagner’s response to the advent of a mass culture in the
second half of the nineteenth century was to retreat even further into the
splendid and exclusive isolation of Bayreuth. While the theatre and its festival
had originally been designed for performances of the Ring cycle, Wagner had in
the meantime allowed the Ring to be performed elsewhere, an opportunity seized
with tremendous entrepreneurial energy and imagination by the singer and
impresario Angelo Neumann who, after bringing the work to Leipzig in 1878 and
Berlin in 1881, formed a touring ‘Richard Wagner Theatre’ with conductor Anton
Seidl, an orchestra of sixty to seventy, two casts, chorus, technical staff and the
original Bayreuth decor that Wagner had been willing to sell. Between September
1882 and June 1883, the company performed twenty-nine Ring cycles in twenty-
five cities across Germany, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy and Austro-
Hungary, as well as individual operas and promotional concerts.
With Parsifal, the situation was to be entirely different. Composed with the
unique and now tested acoustics of the Bayreuth theatre in mind, Parsifal, it
is no exaggeration to argue, is indeed like no other work composed for the
operatic stage. The idea of exclusivity accompanied Parsifal from the beginning.
Hans von Wolzogen, writing in the Bayreuther Blätter of 1879, announced his
hopes that Parsifal would serve to form a ‘permanent community’ (‘bleibenden
Genossenschaft’) representing ‘pure and German art’ (‘die reine und deutsche
Kunst’) that would ‘survive the death of the composer and take on a life of its
own’. 59 Wagner is even clearer in his 1 December 1880 message to the Patrons
of the Bayreuth Festival: ‘I have decided to limit my newest work exclusively and
solely for performances on the Stage Festival Theatre of Bayreuth.’60 And, he
emphasizes: ‘in the future, Parsifal will be performed only in Bayreuth.’ 61
Why? Wagner delivers a rather detailed explanation in his 28 September 1880
letter to King Ludwig II. In it, he rails once again against the theatres of his day
and against the public that frequents such establishments. It is a complaint once
again with its roots in the Paris stay of 1839–42, but now with the added proof
of a lifetime’s worth of abuse and under-appreciation – as far as Wagner was
concerned. Now, Wagner must ask himself, ‘whether I should not at least rescue
this latest and most sacred of my works from […] a common operatic career’. 62
Wagner talks about the ‘sacred’ (‘heilig’) nature of Parsifal and argues that profane
and ‘frivolous’ works are also not performed in churches, which is why he has
titled his work a Stage Consecration Festival Play (‘Bühnenweihfestspiel’): ‘and so
I must now try to consecrate a stage for it, and this can be only my solitary festival
theatre in Bayreuth. There, and there alone, may Parsifal be presented now and
always: never shall Parsifal be offered in any other theatre as an amusement for
its audience.’ 63 In other words, the sacred Parsifal cannot be performed on a stage
contaminated by immoral and profane works, defined as such in part because
their creation and their performance are predicated on the desire for success,
meaning financial gain.64
On the face of it, Wagner’s move can be seen as the quintessential expression
of ‘Kunstreligion’: a work of art is treated as a religious object and reserved for
performance solely on consecrated ground. As Wagner wrote in the oft-quoted
first line of his famous late essay on ‘Religion and Art’ (1880): ‘One might say
that where Religion becomes artificial, it is reserved for Art to save the spirit of
Religion by recognizing the figurative value of the mythic symbols which the
former would have us believe in their literal sense, and revealing their deep and
hidden truth through an ideal presentation.’65 Rhetorically speaking, Wagner’s
59 Hans von Wolzogen, ‘Im neuen Jahre’, Bayreuther Blätter 1 (January 1879), pp. 1–11,
at pp. 10–11.
60 SSD, vol. 10, p. 32, in ‘Zur Mittheilung an die geerhten Patrone der
Bühnenfestspiele in Bayreuth’.
61 Ibid., pp. 32–3.
62 Wagner to King Ludwig II, 28 September 1880, SSD, vol. 16, p. 128; English in
Richard Wagner, Selected Letters of Richard Wagner, trans. and ed. Stewart
Spencer and Barry Millington (New York: Norton, 1987), pp. 902–3.
63 Ibid.
64 One can see how easily such an argument can be transferred onto the racial sphere,
as many have suggested, in the case of Parsifal as a work in which anti-Semitism is
embedded in its fabric.
65 Wagner, ‘Religion und Kunst’, SSD, vol. 10, p. 211; English from Ellis, Richard
Wagner’s Prose Works, vol. 6, p. 211.
T oday, serving the globalized and media-driven society of our time, major
orchestral institutions strategically control commercial ‘message-making’ on
behalf of their conductors. Now the function of conductor is synonymous with
leadership, celebrity, power and the embodiment of interpretative wisdom – a
change of image that came about in continental Europe during the second half of
the nineteenth century following the deaths of Wagner and Brahms.1 In Britain,
however, it was only as recently as the twentieth century that this personality-
driven and centralized concept of the conductor’s role became normalized. This
chapter focuses on two previously underexplored individuals and examines the
commercial aspects surrounding conductors and their roles as mediators of art
music during this time of change. It probes the ways in which two prominent
musicians in Britain, Julius Benedict (1804–85) and Frederic Cowen (1852–1935),
exploited, valued and promoted the function of conductor within their careers,
thereby revealing a clearer sense of the extent to which they led and shaped
their own progress as conductors. The ways in which their overall contributions
mirrored current traditions, while also contributing to the genesis of the function
itself within the scope of the commercial marketplace in which they operated,
provide insights into the changing status of conducting as an art.
Prior to World War I, conductors in Britain generally promoted their own
careers and depended heavily on perceptions of musical pedigree, productive
networks, projected personality and, in some cases, showmanship to do so.2 John
1 See José Antonio Bowen and Raymond Holden, ‘The Central European Tradition’,
The Cambridge Companion to Conducting, ed. José Antonio Bowen (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 114–33, at p. 114; see also Jeremy Siepmann,
‘The History of Direction and Conducting’, The Cambridge Companion to the
Orchestra, ed. Colin Lawson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003),
pp. 112–25.
2 Only in 1915 were Sir Thomas Beecham and Sir Henry Wood enrolled as
contracted stars by Columbia UK; David Patmore, ‘Selling Sounds: Recordings
and the Record Business’, The Cambridge Companion to Recorded Music, ed.
Nicholas Cook, Eric Clarke and Daniel Leech-Wilkinson (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2009), pp. 120–39, at p. 125. For the particular circumstances of
the promotion and development of orchestral concerts at the Queen’s Hall (1893–),
including Henry Wood’s role as conductor and the later establishment of the
London Symphony Orchestra (1904) and Beecham Symphony Orchestra (1909),
130
Spitzer has shown that similar trends prevailed in the context of nineteenth-
century America, where, for orchestras, ‘selling the conductor’ was not a common
marketing strategy.3 The agency of the recording industry came to play a vital
role in the commodification of conductors. However, not until 1913 was the ‘first
celebrity orchestral recording’ produced;4 and, as Robert Philip has shown, not
until the late 1920s did the orchestral recording industry blossom.5
In Victorian Britain, the notion of the conductor as a focal and high-status
artistic leader emerged gradually. The practices and expectations of visiting
European composer-conductors in London (including Weber, Spohr, Mendelssohn,
Berlioz, Wagner, Strauss and Mahler) broadened horizons. Stretching across
the mid century and into the 1900s, the significant contributions of conductors
including Michael Costa (1808–84), Charles Hallé (1819–95), August Manns (1825–
1907) and Hans Richter (1843–1916) have been the subject of detailed research
and evaluation.6 Each of these men was intimately connected to established
institutions and benefited from the increased autonomy this afforded them. Yet
there were many other individuals in Britain whose portfolios of work included
high-profile conducting engagements.7 Both Benedict and Cowen forged portfolio
careers within which their work and status as conductors constituted a substantial
element. Although celebrated in their day, their involvement in this aspect of
see Leanne Langley, ‘Joining Up the Dots: Cross-Channel Models in the Shaping
of London Orchestral Culture, 1895–1914’, Music and Performance Culture in
Nineteenth-Century Britain, pp. 37–58.
3 John Spitzer shows that American conductors were also mainly generalists in
this period in ‘Marketing the American Orchestra’, American Orchestras in the
Nineteenth Century, ed. John Spitzer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012),
pp. 219–24, at p. 221.
4 The recording featured the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, conducted by Artur
Nikisch, performing Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5; Jerome F. Weber, ‘7. Repertory
and Marketing’, in Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume, et al. ‘Recorded Sound’, GMO
[accessed 8 July 2014].
5 Robert Philip, ‘Historical Recordings of Orchestras’, The Cambridge Companion to
the Orchestra, pp. 203–17, at p. 206.
6 Examples include Robert Beale, Charles Hallé: A Musical Life (Aldershot: Ashgate,
2007); Christopher Fifield, True Artist and True Friend: A Biography of Hans
Richter (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993); John Goulden, Michael Costa,
England’s First Conductor: The Revolution in Musical Performance in England,
1830–1880 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015); Stephen Johnson, ‘The English Tradition’,
The Cambridge Companion to Conducting, pp. 178–90; Michael Kennedy, The
Hallé Tradition: A Century of Music (Manchester: Manchester University Press,
1960); Kennedy, The Autobiography of Charles Hallé, with Correspondence and
Diaries (London: Paul Elek, 1972); Kennedy, The Hallé 1858–1983: A History of
the Orchestra (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1982); and Michael
Musgrave, ‘Changing Values in Nineteenth-Century Performance: The Work of
Michael Costa and August Manns’, Music and British Culture, pp. 169–91.
7 As one example, Duncan Barker has examined the conducting activities of
Alexander Campbell Mackenzie (1847–1935) in ‘Another String to his Bow: The
Composer Conducts’, NCBMS 3, pp. 195–205.
musical life has now been largely forgotten. Both men lived into their eighties and
had long careers, which taken together spanned the period from Queen Victoria’s
accession (in 1837) to World War I; the demands of sustaining a profile into old
age can be traced in each case. Exploring the approaches these men took to self-
promotion and examining the synergies between their conducting and other
musical undertakings sheds new light on the internal and external factors that
underpinned the musical marketplace in Britain.
German-born (Sir) Julius Benedict became a naturalized Englishman whose
activities encompassed metropolitan and regional conducting engagements in
opera house and concert hall. A composer of large-scale works, he also produced
biographical writings on his esteemed associates Weber and Mendelssohn and
edited Beethoven’s piano music and Weber’s operas. One of Benedict’s pupils, the
second subject of this discussion, was the widely travelled English virtuoso pianist
and composer (Sir) Frederic Hymen Cowen, who forged multiple and important
associations with key institutions as conductor. He too wrote biographies of ‘great
composers’ but also appealed to a wider market through his popular ballads.
His engagements included conducting roles for the London Philharmonic
Society and Promenade Concerts, Manchester’s Hallé Orchestra and Liverpool’s
Philharmonic Society.
Neither of these musicians can be categorized as what Spitzer has termed
an ‘entrepreneur conductor’ of an ‘enterprise orchestra’.8 In Spitzer’s definition,
‘entrepreneur conductors’, many of whom were also composers, operated in
Europe and the United States taking the responsibility and the risk for the
financial underpinning of their orchestras. Enjoying their heyday between the
1840s and the 1880s, these enterprise orchestras were those ‘created, led and
managed by a single man’ and were box-office dependent. In a marketplace within
which the consumption of orchestral music was tethered to social aspiration, the
contrastingly composite nature of the work of those I term ‘portfolio conductors’
(such as Benedict and Cowen, for example) affords evidence of an awareness
of the need for personal ‘branding’. Each of these musicians serviced Britain’s
concert life during a period of transition in orchestral activities.9 Their successive
careers provide a sense of the evolving experiences of portfolio conductors, men
whose profiles and earnings emanated from multiple aspects of their careers
as musicians and connected them with myriad events, societies and other
10 Bowen and Holden, ‘The Central European Tradition’, p. 114; and Raymond
Holden, The Virtuoso Conductors: The Central European Tradition from Wagner to
Karajan (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005). In discussing the significance
of Wagner’s conducting practices and ideologies, Holden profiles the careers
of Von Bülow, Nikisch, Felix Weingartner, Richard Strauss, Bruno Walter, Otto
Klemperer, Wilhelm Furtwängler and Herbert von Karajan.
with the orchestra at London’s Crystal Palace, with its honed structures and
carefully enforced standards) and the pianist Hallé (who, from 1849, dominated
Manchester’s musical life), exploited the opportunities offered by their relatively
stable institutions, to raise standards. Between 1846 and 1854, another continental
European, the Italian conductor Costa, pioneered new understandings of the
conductor’s sphere of control, with a particular emphasis on disciplinary matters.
His autocratic management style encompassed enforcement of contractual
demands and alterations to orchestral layouts and rehearsal structures.11
A number of examples dating from the final decades of the century provide
evidence of the direct prejudice in the press with regard to native origin and
intrinsic merit. In 1880, Benedict’s successor as conductor in Liverpool was the
German composer Max Bruch. He had gained more votes from the Society’s
directors than Cowen, who was also shortlisted for the post. The public backlash
against the appointment of Bruch – a foreigner rather than a native musician –
stressed Benedict’s nearly fifty years of contributions to English musical life and
his consequent acceptance as a ‘naturalized Englishman’. 12 That same year, when
on the retirement of Costa the Leeds Music Festival Committee appointed the
thirty-eight-year-old native Englishman Sir Arthur Sullivan as conductor, the
press expressed strong approval.13 Issues of xenophobia also revealed themselves
at the time of Hallé’s sudden death in 1895. His unexpected demise raised
particular issues of succession planning for his eponymous Manchester orchestra,
and the Bristol Mercury attempted to settle the score. The newspaper stated that
Hallé’s career advantages stemmed from his German origins and asserted that the
free-market approach to recruiting conductors could lead to deliberate exclusion
of talented local practitioners.14 It was against this complex tapestry of values,
prejudices and inequity of opportunity that the conducting profession evolved in
Britain.
Forging Careers
Today, Benedict is mainly remembered for his biographies of Mendelssohn (1850)
and Weber (1881), for his opera The Lily of Killarney (1862) and for his association
with Jenny Lind.15 This summary alone embeds direct connections with idols
of the British musical imagination and with ideals associated with purity and
rational recreation (via Lind, Mendelssohn and oratorio).16 A Stuttgart-born
11 Costa’s influence with regard to revised practices has been reassessed in detail in
Goulden, Michael Costa.
12 ‘Music at Liverpool’, MW, 17 April 1880, p. 248.
13 P. Teazle, ‘An Englishman at Home’, MW, 21 February 1880, pp. 121–2.
14 ‘Sir Charles Hallé’ [editorial], Bristol Mercury and Daily Post, 28 October 1895.
15 The main secondary sources for Benedict’s life and career are Nicholas Temperley,
‘Benedict, Sir Julius’, GMO [accessed 22 August 2013]; and Clive Brown, ‘Benedict,
Sir Julius (1804–1885)’, ODNB [accessed 22 August 2013].
16 For further context see, for example, George Biddlecombe, ‘The Construction of a
Cultural Icon: The Case of Jenny Lind’, NCBMS 3, pp. 45–61; Biddlecombe, ‘Secret
19 The details of the manner of his conducting remain reliant on scraps from
contemporary criticism, which are all too often opaque in meaning – a frustrating
example is ‘Benedict conducted with all his usual ability’, stated within the review
‘Liverpool Philharmonic Society’s Concert’, Liverpool Mercury, 29 January 1873,
p. 6.
20 The most thorough source of information on Cowen, drawing on the main
secondary biographical sources and focusing on his compositional output, is
Christopher J. Parker, ‘The Music of Sir Frederic H. Cowen (1852–1935): A Critical
Study’, 2 vols, Ph.D. diss., University of Durham, 2007.
21 See Charles Willeby, Masters of English Music (London: Osgood, 1893), pp. 214–15,
for a comment on the relationship between Ward and Cowen.
22 The main secondary sources of information on Cowen’s life and music are
George Biddlecombe, ‘Cowen, Sir Frederic Hymen (1852–1935)’ ODNB [accessed
22 August 2013]; Audley C. Chambers, ‘Frederic Hymen Cowen: Analysis and
Reception History of his Songs for Voice and Piano’, Ph.D. diss., Northwestern
University, 2007; Frederic Cowen, My Art and My Friends (London: Edward
Arnold, 1913); Jeremy Dibble and Jennifer Spencer, ‘Cowen, Sir Frederic Hymen’,
GMO [accessed 22 August 2013]; and Parker, ‘The Music of Sir Frederic H. Cowen’.
the rumour mill included the front-page suggestion that Cowen would be
knighted in 1889 for his services to the British Empire.29
His conducting work was enduring and international, but his mode of
negotiation and his artistic agendas ruffled feathers. Cowen sought to champion
British music through his conducting engagements nationwide. At the London
Philharmonic Society he was dedicated to including ‘one work from an English
pen’ in every concert,30 a campaigning mentality which may have stymied
his advancement as an interpreter of the central European repertoire.31 His
non-specialist profile meant that men such as Hans Richter and Henry Wood
(1869–1944), who focused solely on conducting (i.e. as ‘career conductors’),
upstaged him. From the 1880s onwards, Cowen’s orchestral conducting career
began to gather momentum; he remained a key figure in the conducting business
until around 1914; and thereafter he was at the helm for the grandiose Handel
Festivals.32 Cowen deliberately fought to ensure that conducting activities did not
fill his calendar entirely, however – his vocation as composer was vital to him.33
In succeeding Sullivan in 1880 as conductor of the London Promenade
Concerts, Cowen’s emergence as a genuine contender in the field of orchestral
conducting was unambiguous. While as conductor Benedict had not been
strongly attached to London’s core orchestral activities, Cowen was now gaining
acceptance among influential circles. In June 1880 the Athenaeum proclaimed that
Cowen was ‘well-known as a thoroughly qualified conductor’.34 His subsequent
conducting engagements included the (London) Philharmonic Society (1888–92
and 1900–07), the Hallé Orchestra (1895–99) until he was replaced by Richter,
the Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra (1896–1913), the Bradford Festival Choral
Society (1897–1915) and Bradford Permanent Orchestra (1899–1902); he also
conducted the Scottish Orchestra for a decade (1900–10) and was conductor of
festivals including Scarborough (1899), and the triennial Cardiff (1902–10) and
Handel festivals (1902–23).
On Cowen’s death in 1935 the Musical Times obituary observed, ‘Had Cowen
never played or written a note, he would deserve to be remembered as one of the
most hard-working conductors of his time. It was he alone who stood out against
the supremacy of the foreigner.’ 35 This is in stark contrast to the analysis of the
Benedict
Authority automatically stemmed from Benedict’s oft-touted connections with
past masters. His musical pedigree was replete with links to revered German
composers: he was known to have been a pupil of Hummel (in whose company he
met Beethoven in October 1823), to have been Weber’s first student, and to have
met with Mendelssohn on many occasions, enjoying his approbation. Making this
lineage publicly known did not happen by accident but stemmed from careful
promotion of Benedict’s illustrious background. The British concert public’s
reverence for Hummel, Beethoven, Weber and Mendelssohn rubbed off positively
36 ‘Sir Julius Benedict’, MT, 1 July 1885, pp. 385–6. This obituary includes such
statements as: ‘But it would be hard to say in which department Benedict gained
most of his reputation. He made essays in all, and in all he won distinction.
Perhaps it cannot be said that he was ever a great conductor, but he would scarcely
have been suffered to wield the baton for so many years at the Norwich Festival
and the Liverpool Philharmonic Society had he not proved himself competent to
discharge the duties appertaining to his office in these undertakings’ (p. 385); and:
‘Here again we note the many-sided nature of his powers’ (p. 386).
37 Jules Benedict, Sketch of the Life and Works of the Late Felix Mendelssohn
Bartholdy Being the Substance of a Lecture delivered at the Camberwell Literary
Institution in December 1849 (London: John Murray, 1850).
38 GB-Lbl, Norcott 292(i), [Libretto] Oberon / An Opera in Four Acts / By J.R. Planché
/ The Music Composed by / Carl Maria von Weber / The Recitatives and Additional
Pieces Selected and Arranged from the Works of the Same Composer / By Jules
Benedict / As Represented at Her Majesty’s Theatre (London: J. Miles & Co.). For a
re-evaluation of the mixed reception of Planché’s English libretto for Oberon and
of his professional fortunes, see Alan Fischler, ‘Oberon and Odium: The Career and
Crucifixion of J. R. Planché’, Opera Quarterly 21 (1995), 5–26.
39 Sir Julius Benedict, The Great Musicians: Weber, series ed. Francis Hueffer
(London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, 1881). Benedict dedicated
the volume to Queen Victoria.
40 Ibid., p. 77.
the London home of Sir George Smart, Weber provided another vital association
within Benedict’s web of connections with the past.
The patterns of programming during Benedict’s popular conductorship of the
Liverpool Philharmonic Society (1867–80) reveal that he did not use his role to
over-promote his own compositions. The works of Beethoven (symphonies and
overtures), Weber, Mozart and Handel are present in abundance. Programming
of operatic material by Auber, Donizetti, Rossini, Mozart, Bellini, Verdi and
Wagner provide another pronounced thread. Elsewhere in his portfolio of
activities, Benedict’s Annual Grand Evening Concerts featured in London’s
concert schedule for fifty years. To take one example (from around mid century)
of the style and content of these long-established concerts, the programme for 21
May 1856 at Exeter Hall shows that Weber’s Jubilee overture opened the concert,
followed by items by J. S. Bach, Handel, Mozart, Rossini, Spohr, Meyerbeer, and
Benedict’s own compositions; Jenny Lind topped the bill of star performers,
which included Heinrich Ernst, Alfredo Piatti, Pauline Viardot and Giovanni
Belletti, directed by Benedict whose role encompassed conductor and pianist.
The patronage of the Queen and the Prince Consort, together with that of the
Duchesses of Kent, Gloucester and Cambridge, was trumpeted in the concert’s
book of words.41 The Morning Post review of the concert asserted: ‘It were strange
indeed if Mr. Benedict’s annual concert lacked patronage, for no artist has a larger
connection, and a man more popular in society, or in the profession he follows,
does not exist.’ 42 In a wise act of self-promotion, Benedict’s Century Magazine
feature on Jenny Lind, published in 1881, served to remind readers, well after the
fact, of his illustrious connection to the star vocalist.43
Benedict ensured that his network of patrons was influential, and evidence
of his success in this regard is particularly abundant in the 1870s and 1880s. At
Windsor Castle on 24 March 1871 he was dubbed a ‘Knight Bachelor’ alongside
fellow musicians William Sterndale Bennett and George Elvey and the Director
of the National Gallery at Windsor Castle, William Boxall.44 Knighthoods
conferred advantage and access to the top tables of high society and were, as
yet, rarely awarded to musicians. Although Benedict did not hold a doctorate
in music, he was now upgraded from ‘Esquire’ to ‘Sir’.45 Such connections can
have only enhanced Benedict’s ranking in the music business and increased
his attractiveness to an upper-class clientele within his teaching practice in
Manchester Square. Benedict’s enjoyment of Queen Victoria’s patronage indicates
that his value as a musician and his effectiveness as a networker were recognized
in her circles.46 Further evidence of his leverage and profile within society’s
higher echelons is apparent from occasions such as the afternoon of 20 May
1875 when the sumptuous Dudley House in London’s Park Lane was the venue
for a testimonial to him, hosted by the Earl of Dudley and attended by royal and
artistic subscribers.47 Those assembled gave Benedict a ‘massive service of plate’
and the Earl delivered a speech, punctuated by applause, emphasizing gratitude
for Benedict’s forty years of great devotion to the ‘cause of musical art in this
country’. His royal connections again featured in the press in 1883 when the Pall
Mall Gazette provided a listing of guests at a dinner party he attended, given by
the Prince of Wales at Marlborough House on 8 May.48 So it was that, in view of
substantial losses in failed undertakings in which he had been ‘induced’ to invest,
a financial testimonial was mounted in June 1884 to assist him in achieving fiscal
equilibrium.49
Cowen
Cowen too wrote books and articles; dating from the twentieth century they
span a broad spectrum mirroring that found in his compositional output. Like
Benedict, he wrote monographs on ‘great composers’: his four short studies of
Mozart, Haydn, Mendelssohn and Rossini appeared in the Masterpieces of Music
series, published by T. C. & E. C. Jack in 1912. Regardless of the biting criticism
in the Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science and Art, which described
his contributions on Haydn and Rossini as ‘slipshod’, Cowen’s biographies
to enhance his progress during the central period of his career. Through his strong
sense of justice, Cowen was given to involvement in public controversies and
disputes. Examples include his lobbying of the London Philharmonic Society (to
his own detriment) over rehearsal time and programming licence in 189258 and his
protracted wrangles with the Hallé executive in 1898 over questions of permanency
in the post of conductor. He trod a dangerous tightrope in his candidness with the
press and in his negotiations with institutional directors, and public tumbles were
the consequence.59
It is clearly the case that Cowen did not shy away from publicity, either good
or bad.60 Features on Cowen, some incorporating illustrations including posed
photographs, that appeared in many publications during the 1890s (a turbulent
decade for him) reveal strategic self-promotion and advocacy of his musical
outlook.61 The photographs did not include musical props but rather showed
Cowen, smartly attired, seated and gazing seriously into the distance. As Lewis
Foreman explains in his discussion of kinds of illustrations used by Elgar and
his contemporaries, conductors rarely posed with a baton until after World
War I.62 In Cowen’s case, the professional demeanour of these portraits had the
double purpose of serving his image as conductor and composer. That the articles
proliferated following his Philharmonic Society demise in 1892 cannot have
been coincidental. In January 1893, the Strand Magazine: An Illustrated Monthly
briefly profiled Cowen (including pictures of him aged 3, 11, 16, 24 and 41),
emphasizing his precocity of early talent and the popularity of his works.63 That
same year, in reinforcement of his status, he was included alongside Alexander
Mackenzie, Hubert Parry, Stanford and Sullivan in Charles Willeby’s Masters of
English Music. Here Cowen’s early talent, humour, ambition, experiences through
much travelling, and profile as composer and conductor were emphasized.64 In
March 1894, featuring a commissioned photograph of him on the front cover, The
Minim included a short appreciation of Cowen in which his ability to connect
with and appeal to a wide spectrum of musical interests – a kind of ‘musical
58 ‘Leeds Musical Society’, Yorkshire Gazette, 1 October 1892, p. 5; ‘Current Notes’,
The Lute, 1 September 1892, p. 218. For Cowen’s comments on this incident, see
Cowen, My Art, pp. 227–8.
59 See, for example, Michael Kennedy’s account of the controversy over Cowen’s
position at the Hallé Concerts in 1898 in The Hallé Tradition, chapter 10.
60 For a different view, see Parker, ‘The Music of Sir Frederic H. Cowen’, vol. 1, p. 302,
who asserts that Cowen was reticent.
61 For examples of Cowen’s profile not covered here, see Parker, ‘The Music of Sir
Frederic H. Cowen’.
62 Lewis Foreman, ‘Picturing Elgar and his Contemporaries as Conductors: Elgar
Conducts at Leeds’, Elgar Society Journal 15, no. 6 (November 2008), 30–46, at
p. 35.
63 ‘Portraits of Celebrities’, The Strand Magazine: An Illustrated Monthly 5 (January
1893), p. 161.
64 Willeby, Masters of English Music, pp. 173–256.
65 ‘Mr Frederic H. Cowen’, The Minim, March 1894, pp. 80–1. The photograph was
taken in Cowen’s study by Messrs Wayland and Company of Blackheath and
Streatham.
66 J. E. Woolacott, ‘Interviews with Eminent Musicians: No. 4. Mr Frederic H. Cowen’,
The Strand Musical Magazine: A Musical Monthly 1 (April 1895), pp. 249–52.
Woolacott asked Cowen if he thought ‘that the love of good music is spreading
in England’. In his response Cowen focused solely on English music, noting
that more of it was performed than in the past, and he outlined the particular
economics attached to composition and performance in England.
67 F. G. Edwards, ‘Frederic Hymen Cowen’, MT, 1 November 1898, pp. 713–19.
68 Richter was appointed as conductor of the Hallé concerts from the beginning of
the 1899/1900 season. For an evaluation of the circumstances leading to Cowen’s
loss of the conductorship, see Kennedy, The Hallé Tradition, chapter 10.
69 ‘Conductors – Native or Foreign?’, MT, 1 November 1898, pp. 723–4.
70 For Cowen’s retrospective account of this furore, see Cowen, My Art, pp. 223–4.
For the minutes of the relevant Directors’ Meetings, see GB-Lbl, RPS MS 288,
20 June 1892–15 July 1892, fols 165v–72r.
71 GB-Lbl, Egerton MS 3095, fol. 120r, letter from Cowen to F. G. Edwards,
5 November 1898. Cowen enclosed a song album at Edwards’s request. In 1899,
Isabel Brooke Alder furnished a profile of Cowen in The Minim (May 1899,
‘Frederic H. Cowen’, p. 194), in which his ceaseless work, reliability, connections
and determination were highlighted: ‘As a conductor, Frederic Cowen has won
the esteem of the highest authorities in matters musical, and the devotion to the
interests of his associates has ever testified to their true regard for his sterling
merits and unsurpassable qualifications.’
72 In 1894, his lack of financial cushion left him, for example, unable to invest
personally in the Queen’s Hall project managed by Robert Newman; Cowen, My
Art, pp. 234–5; and see also Leanne Langley, ‘Building an Orchestra, Creating an
Audience: Robert Newman and the Queen’s Hall Promenade Concerts, 1895–1926’,
The Proms: A New History, ed. Jenny Doctor and David Wright (London: Thames
and Hudson, 2007), pp. 32–73, at p. 289 n. 11.
orchestral concerts in 1880 (which were a financial flop).73 Cowen considered that
it was in 1880 that he began his genuine attempt to
take my art and career more in earnest and to endeavour to establish myself,
as far as lay in my power, as a composer of serious purpose, if nothing more.
Besides this, the opportunity – long sought for – came to me of making a
real start in that other branch of the art to which I have since devoted a
considerable portion of my life – namely, that of conducting.74
He understood the prestige of his election to the conductorship of the
Philharmonic Society in 1888 and was frank in describing the 1892 ‘rupture’
created by frustrations relating to programming, rehearsal time, deputies and
foreign composer-conductors.75 His re-evaluation of this incident shows his
pragmatic take, some twenty years later, on what he now described as his ‘own
indiscretion’. His retelling of the process of gaining the prestigious period of work
in Melbourne is self-effacingly coy – he stated that he named a prohibitive fee,
which they then all but offered him, and he clarified that this exorbitant sum was
indeed £5,000 (£472,000 in today’s money).76 Overall, My Art and My Friends
confirms Cowen’s ongoing sense of being at odds with the status quo within
British concert life. His tales of negotiation, amelioration and conflict, and some
evidence of improvements shaped by his arbitration form a thread throughout
his account of his conducting career. His view of his Britishness in Britain (he
placed no emphasis in his autobiography on his colonial origins) was that it had
automatically handicapped his progress.
Conclusions
By the end of the nineteenth century in Britain the expectation of specialist
concentration on conducting as a profession was developing apace. Both Benedict
and Cowen, their deaths separated by fifty years, gained from self-promotion
of explicit connections with continental European traditions despite having
had to work around anti-British prejudice. Through his assorted associations,
including the triangulation of conducting work in London, Norwich and
Liverpool, Benedict occupied a cherished position in the musical life of the
nation. Institutional representatives as well as artists whose lives he had touched
attended his Kensal Green (London) burial in June 1885.77 Benedict’s skills as a
conductor were secondary to the perception that in him was vested a unique
understanding of the music of the great masters. His elevated, gentlemanly, elder-
statesman-like and paternalistic approach was in stark contrast to Cowen’s sense
of agency on behalf of his art. When Cowen’s core period of conducting activity
drew to a close in 1914, the country was at war. A well-read, talented musician
and opinionated individual, whose compositions were overshadowed by those
of Sullivan and Elgar, Cowen was less circumspect than Benedict, and timing
and competition were often against him. His was a dual profile (composer and
conductor), which thus differed from Benedict’s generalized one. Press furores
over his departures from the London Philharmonic Society and from the Hallé
Orchestra added up to many thousands of words. Generating controversy, partly
through a tendency to be governed by entrenched convictions, meant that
Cowen personified the vexed issues facing conductors as mediators of art music
in Britain. Both men had demonstrated a keen awareness of reputation-building
through the powers of association, the value of connections, and the embodiment
of wisdom and specialist knowledge, as well as of management of the written
word. Their experiences, opportunities, choices and influence contributed to the
development of the expectations and status of the orchestral conductor’s role in
Britain.
The opportunities available to Benedict and Cowen – as British conductors
of art music in a commercial world – were limited by others’ monopoly of core
institutional conductorships. Yet both men enjoyed some success and popularity
as conductors. They accomplished this by following convention and, in Cowen’s
case, by leading change via assertive imposition of requirements and expectations
drawn from first-hand experience of Continental practices. Cowen, operating
in a period of transition, held principled convictions that were significant both
in his shaping of concepts of the role and in his capacity to execute it. Cowen
responded to the demands of a musical public that was becoming ever more
familiar with Continental standards of interpretation at the hands of crowd-
drawing conductors, such as Richter, Richard Strauss, Charles Lamoureux and
the image-conscious Wood.78 Career conductors, such as Richter and Wood,
recognized the importance of a dedicated, carefully packaged profile in satisfying
audiences in a competitive marketplace. Cowen and Benedict were productive
portfolio conductors, and there is no question but that their experiences, though
they differed, mirrored the process of adaptation that was taking place.
Instruments
W hile thumbing through the Saturday Evening Post in mid September 1917,
the average American reader might have stumbled upon the following from
a full-page account by the fictive John Smith, Merchant and Pianist:
While I was enjoying an after-dinner cigar and a magazine article the other
evening, Mother took up my evening paper as usual. Presently she spoke.
‘John’, she said, ‘don’t you want to give us a little music?’
‘Surely’, I said, going over to the music cabinet. ‘What shall I play?
Classical, popular, or what?’
‘Oh, play anything’, she answered, ‘I like it all.’
So I selected my program and carried the rolls over to the piano. Two
pieces of Nevin’s: ‘A Venetian Love Song’ and the ‘Gondolier’. Chopin’s
‘Ballade in A Flat’, Liszt’s ‘12th Hungarian Rhapsodie’, Beethoven’s ‘Sonata
Pathètique’ [sic] (the Andante Movement), a ‘Romance’ by Pascal, a Medley
of Popular Broadway Hits, and a rattling new fox-trot by Ted Eastwood.
I adjusted the first roll – the ‘Venetian Love Song’ – put my feet on the
treadles, my hands on the expression levers and – lo! The music had me.1
Paragraphs later, after extolling the expressive possibilities of the Pianola-brand
player piano, spokesman Smith urged readers to ‘Trade in your old, silent piano’
and take up active music-making at the mechanical player piano. However,
even as the advertisement’s domestic tableau was promoting the new music
commodity, its messaging was alternately embracing and throwing into question
deep-seated cultural norms around the conventional (hand-played) ‘old, silent
piano’, an instrument still widely purchased, played and displayed in upper-,
middle- and (increasingly) working-class homes.
Much existing scholarship on the mechanical piano comments on its
advertising, frequently highlighting the strategic ways in which its early-
twentieth-century promotion piggybacked on the conventional piano’s accepted
1 Aeolian Company, ‘A Story of an Evening with the Pianola, The great modern
pianoforte that all can play’, advertisement, SEP, 22 September 1917, p. 78.
152
place in the American parlour.2 In point of fact, the often-cited themes linking
the two instruments’ identities, including ‘middle-classness’, family (with the
noted addition of men in the case of mechanical pianos) and music appreciation,
are readily evident in the Pianola ad referenced above.3 At the same time, the
mechanical piano is commonly implicated for its catalytic role in broad changes
that we now (often negatively) link to the accelerated commodification of music
in early-twentieth-century American musical life, including the shift away from
amateur music-making and towards passive music listening and mass-produced,
consumption-based musical experiences.4 Less audible in these discussions are
considerations of the conventional piano, the knot of gendered Victorian-era
associations that continued to linger around it, and its extra-musical history as an
object of status in American homes.
This chapter argues that the cultural meaning and commodity status
connected to each instrument – especially as they related to one another – was
far more complex than current conversations suggest. This comparison of how
conventional and mechanical pianos were presented in the years before the
height of the latter’s popularity in the early to mid 1920s offers a glimpse into
both instruments’ commercial identities at a historical moment when nineteenth-
century notions of music and gender, display, learning and performance were in
a state of flux.5 The study addresses press ads and content, 1914–17, through a
sampling of years leading up to the player piano’s breakout success,6 and it draws
from two mainstream magazines, the monthly women’s magazine Ladies’ Home
Journal and weekly family-friendly Saturday Evening Post, whose phenomenal
2 Dating back at least as early as Alfred Dolge’s 1911 Pianos and their Makers
(Covina, CA: Covina Publishing Company; reprint, New York: Dover, 1972),
the role advertising played in bringing the mechanical piano into mainstream
acceptance has been a regular part of its historiography (see Dolge, esp. pp. 150
and 330). See also Timothy D. Taylor, ‘The Commodification of Music at the Dawn
of the Era of “Mechanical Music”’, Ethnomusicology 51 (2007), 281–305, at p. 286,
and Ehrlich, The Piano, p. 135.
3 According to Craig H. Roell (The Piano in America, 1890–1940 [Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press, 1989], p. 154), shared themes between
conventional- and mechanical-piano advertising included ‘Victorian notions
of home, family life, and the benefits of music education’, along with celebrity
endorsements and the instruments’ social cachet.
4 For example, recent works by David Suisman (Selling Sounds: The Commercial
Revolution in American Music [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009],
pp. 92–101) and Taylor (‘Commodification of Music’, p. 301) locate the player
piano as a critical pivot instrument between Victorian-era producer ethics and
twentieth-century consumer ethics.
5 This chapter deals primarily with how mechanical and conventional pianos were
promoted and regretfully leaves aside questions of repertoire (including music
written specifically for the mechanical piano, as well as ragtime and other popular
musics associated with it).
6 My larger study begins in 1910 and extends through 1918, the year before Edward
Bok retired from Ladies’ Home Journal and the magazine assumed new leadership
(the cut-off date of the present essay is unrelated to World War I).
of the technology, which in its most basic form had existed many decades
previously.9 The conventional-piano industry heartily embraced the commercial
potential of mechanical pianos and unveiled a vast assortment of instruments
of varying sophistication, design and cost.10 Some manufacturers borrowed the
euphonious appeal of Aeolian’s ‘Pianola’, selling their mechanized pianos under
labels such as ‘Technola’, ‘Aeriola’, ‘Interiola’ and ‘Symphonola’.11 Mechanical-
piano (especially player-piano) popularity soared through the 1910s and early
1920s, even outpacing conventional-piano production beginning around 1919;
however, the instruments fell sharply out of favour a decade later, losing ground
to the phonograph and – increasingly – to the radio during the later 1920s.12
The value of mechanical-piano technologies has been a subject of debate, then
and now. Standing on the other side of John Philip Sousa’s famed 1906 diatribe
against ‘The Menace of Mechanical Music’ were various advocates, who praised
mechanical pianos as an antidote to the parlour noise of musical amateurs, as an
aid to conventional-piano study and as a genuine means of accessing (and in fact
making) music.13 In the years since the rise and fall of mechanical pianos, a knot
of critical associations has shaped scholarly discussions around them, including
the faddish quality of their popularity, distrustful perceptions of their marketing
and entrance into the mainstream American parlour, and the widespread decline
in conventional-piano sales that occurred alongside those of mechanical pianos in
the later 1920s.14
In the mid 1910s, cultural cues about pianos – conventional and mechanical –
were embedded in any number of sources, including mass-circulating periodicals.
The spectacularly popular Ladies’ Home Journal and Saturday Evening Post led
the pack in these years, and while the Journal was the first American magazine
to claim over one million subscribers (in 1903), both periodicals reached the
astounding 2 million mark by 1919.15 Ads for musical instruments and sheet
music appeared across the pages of both publications, but music advocacy more
obviously pervaded the Journal. The piano was of central interest, a point made
evident in 1907 by the start of famed Polish-American pianist Josef Hofmann’s
tenure as a music editor and of ultimately what would be a ten-year run of his
full-page column addressing Journal readers’ piano questions.16 Dorothy Vogel’s
study of the musical content that appeared in the Journal between 1890 and 1919
found over 200 music and music-education articles, in addition to hundreds of
sheet-music inserts.17 Dominated by songs with piano accompaniment and
dances written for the piano, such short musical selections were standard
across many American magazines through the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries.18 Characteristically, this music was marked by technical simplicity,
homophonic textures and tonal melodies, and it was often pragmatically arranged
in space-saving da capo or strophic forms.19 In addition, the Journal followed
in the cultural footsteps of the popular nineteenth-century American women’s
magazine Godey’s Lady’s Book, by frequently offering amateur women composers
a national platform for their music compositions.20 Readers of the Journal in
1910, for example, might have noticed a piano-vocal score, attributed to amateur
Miriam Graham, titled, ‘The Life-Road: A Marriage Song’, in addition to works by
professional male composers Edward Elgar and Ethelbert Nevin.21
Advertisements framed these monthly testaments to music’s importance and
implied special relevance to the Journal’s largely female readership. While plenty
of piano advertising from the period broadly promoted a given manufacturer’s
brand name, rather than advertising its conventional- or mechanical-piano lines
specifically, a majority of ads in the Post and Journal (from the early 1910s through
16 Bonny H. Miller (‘The Josef Hofmann Years at the Ladies’ Home Journal’, Piano
Quarterly 38 [Spring 1990], 25–35, at pp. 25–6) counts over sixty columns running
in this ten-year span. Josef Hofmann, along with many renowned pianists of his
era, participated in the promotion of mechanical pianos through testimonial-style
advertising and through roll creation; see, for example, Aeolian Company, ‘Pianola
Piano’, advertisement, LHJ, 1 November 1910, p. 58.
17 Dorothy Vogel, ‘“ To Put Beauty Into the World”: Music Education Resources
in The Ladies’ Home Journal, 1890–1919’, Journal of Historical Research in Music
Education 34 (April 2013), 119–36, at p. 119.
18 Bonny H. Miller states that it was unusual for music found in American magazines
in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to exceed two or three pages in
length; see her ‘Ladies’ Companion, Ladies’ Canon? Women Composers in
American Magazines from Godey’s to the Ladies’ Home Journal’, Cecilia Reclaimed:
Feminist Perspectives on Gender and Music, ed. Susan C. Cook and Judy S. Tsou
(Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994), pp. 156–82, at pp. 159–60. As a
particularly interesting example from the Journal, January, February and March
issues in 1915 each featured a new social dance illustrated step-by-step by Russian
ballerina Anna Pavlova. Each dance appears paired with original sheet music.
19 Ibid., p. 160.
20 Ibid., p. 159.
21 Miriam Graham, ‘The Life-Road: A Marriage Song’, LHJ, 1 October 1910, p. 31;
Edward Elgar, ‘Elgar’s Beautiful “Salute of Love”’, LHJ, April 1910, p. 23; Ethelbert
Nevin, ‘At Night’ (words by Mary Baldwin), LHJ, June 1910, p. 35.
1918) clearly highlighted one or the other piano type.22 Commonly, a combination
of iconography and text worked together to suggest a scenario depicting the
advertised instrument’s use or function. Against this backdrop, it is possible to
consider a peculiar detail relevant to the analysis at hand: although manufacturers
favoured the Journal when placing conventional-piano advertisements during the
1914–17 period, beginning in earnest around 1911 for mechanical-piano (mostly
player-piano) ads they strongly tended towards the Post as the chosen medium.23
During this time, piano companies Ivers & Pond and Steinway routinely placed
ads focusing on their conventional pianos in the Journal, as did Hallet & Davis
and Kranich & Bach beginning in 1916 and 1917, respectively. Mechanical pianos
routinely advertised in the Post in these years included Hallet & Davis’s ‘Virtuolo’
and Baldwin’s ‘Manualo’ player-piano lines, as well as a handful of advertisements
in 1917 for Gulbransen-Dickinson’s player piano (advertised without a catchy
name) and Aeolian’s ‘Pianola’ player piano.
Additional details around both periodicals hint at wider contexts (and
possible explanations) for their commercial and non-commercial music content,
and particularly their piano-ad placement trends. In the early decades of the
1900s, the Journal and the Post were mutually managed by industry giant Curtis
Publishing Company, and although both periodicals targeted the white middle
class, each of them, under the heavy hand of its respective editor, promulgated
divergent gendered cultural ideologies to distinct gendered audiences. Mid-1910s
issues of editor George Horace Lorimer’s family-friendly Post displayed a
forward-looking stance on matters such as women’s higher education, suffrage
and workplace rights. Editor Edward Bok’s didactic Journal stood at a marked –
though far from consistent – ideological distance from the Post, assuming
progressive positions on key reform matters such as temperance and public
education, while characteristically taking a negative or ambivalent stance on
the sorts of social change that might upset normative gender roles for men and
women.24 A chasm separated the two editors’ perceptions of their middle-class
22 In these cases, it was not uncommon for mechanical-piano ads to mention playing
the instrument ‘by hand’, or for ads emphasizing a manufacturer’s conventional
models to mention its player line. Also, Kranich & Bach’s conventional-piano ads
in the Journal routinely listed their slogan: ‘Kranich & Bach Ultra-Quality Pianos
and Player Pianos’. One exception to this is the Packard Company, which ran ads
in the LHJ and the SEP (concentrated in 1911 and 1912) that promoted its brand
name in a more ambiguous fashion.
23 I explore nuances of piano advertising in the Curtis publications spanning 1910
to 1918 in my Ph.D. dissertation: ‘Sound Conversations: Print Media, the Player
Piano, and Early Radio in the US’, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, in
progress.
24 Commenting specifically on the Journal’s perspectives on women’s paid work,
Jennifer Scalon (Inarticulate Longings: The ‘Ladies’ Home Journal’, Gender, and
the Promises of Consumer Culture [New York: Routledge, 1995], p. 80) observes
that the publication ‘provided a forum for all sides’ of the debate, but ultimately
‘favoured’ paid work only as a ‘prelude to marriage’; she also analyses Journal
coverage of women’s suffrage in detail (esp. pp. 109–36). Helen Damon-Moore
(Magazines for the Millions: Gender and Commerce in the ‘Ladies’ Home Journal’
and the ‘Saturday Evening Post’, 1880–1910 [Albany: State University of New York
Press, 1994], esp. pp. 145–88) offers valuable comparisons between the two Curtis
publications and their respective editors, in her seminal study.
25 ‘Condensed Report of Advertising Conference, 1915’, typescript, pp. 5, 21 and
30, Curtis Publishing Company records, Kislak Center for Special Collections,
Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvania [hereafter CP], Box
18. According to Salme Harju Steinberg (Reformer in the Marketplace [Baton
Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1979], pp. xviii, 143), Bok’s ideas were
increasingly at odds with American trends through the 1910s, and it is thought that
his retirement at the end of 1919 followed his refusal of a request issued by Curtis
founder Cyrus Curtis – Bok’s boss and father-in-law – that he ‘modernize the
magazine’.
26 Damon-Moore (Magazines for the Millions, pp. 155 and 182) highlights nuances
of early-twentieth-century gendered commerce as they appear in the two Curtis
publications.
27 For an in-depth look at Curtis Publishing’s role within the development of market
research, see Douglas B. Ward, A New Brand of Business: Charles Coolidge Parlin,
Curtis Publishing Company, and the Origins of Market Research (Philadelphia:
Temple University Press, 2010).
28 Ibid., p. 8. The Division was managed by Charles Coolidge Parlin, a figure whose
work in time would greatly influence the emerging field of market research.
29 Ibid., pp. 6 and 75.
30 For example, while I found fewer than ten player-piano ads per year across the SEP
in 1914 and 1915, I located more than twice that number per year across 1916 and
1917 issues. In the LHJ, I found between twelve and twenty-one conventional-piano
ads per year between 1914 and 1917.
31 On men, music technology, and domestic music-making, see Mark Katz,
Capturing Sound: How Technology Has Changed Music, rev. edn (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2010), pp. 66–8; Roell, The Piano, p. 154; and Taylor,
‘Commodification of Music’, pp. 286–8.
Figure 7.1
Men as active ‘players’
in Saturday Evening
Post player-piano
advertisements
(iconography only)
[Courtesy of The
University Library,
University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign]
to be’, a notion that, especially when applied to the special case of advertising,
must take into account the image-makers’ goals, their ideas about music and
the ways their decisions would in turn – in the words of advertising historian
Roland Marchand – influence the ‘community of discourse’ around advertised
products.32 A 1913 research paper titled ‘Pianos, Organs and Player Pianos’,
prepared within Curtis’s Division of Commercial Research, makes clear that
Curtis and its advertisers were paying attention to questions concerning gender,
the piano and marketing. Within the portion of the paper detailing interviews
with manufacturers, advertising agencies and piano retailers, the advertising
agency used by Hallet & Davis shared how written inquiries generated by the
manufacturer’s recent ad campaign for the Virtuolo player piano were unevenly
divided along gender lines, with 35% sent by women and 65% by men.33 These
comments reveal the sorts of questions the manufacturer was asking about the
emerging player-piano market, and statements from the paper’s author, N. W.
Emerson, likewise betray strategic interest in capitalizing on gender and piano
marketing:
Whether or not the woman is a more important factor than the man in the
purchase of a piano is open to question. Undoubtedly such is the case in
the purchase of a straight [conventional] piano because more women than
men have the ability to play. It would seem that there is a good opportunity
to use exclusively women’s periodicals[,] for this field [advertising
conventional/player pianos in women’s periodicals] has been more or less
neglected.34
Here, while Emerson seems unsure about the appropriate marketing of player
pianos, he argues strongly that women’s periodicals (such as the Journal) were the
best fit for a greater portion of conventional-piano (‘straight’-piano) advertising
based on a common-sense notion that men were less likely than their female
counterparts to receive musical training.
Emerson’s matter-of-fact assessment of women’s greater ‘ability to play’ belies
the complicated nexus of American Victorian gendered ideas around piano
ownership and class, as well as proper decorum that had kept women and girls
32 Emphasis in original. Richard Leppert, Music and Image: Domesticity, Ideology and
Socio-Cultural Formation in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1988), pp. 1–3; and Roland Marchand, Advertising the American
Dream: Making Way for Modernity, 1920–1940 (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1985), p. xx, for the idea of ‘community of discourse’.
33 N. W. Emerson, ‘Pianos, Organs and Player Pianos’, in ‘Research Papers’, typescript,
January 1913, p. 79, CP Box 27. Emerson wrote this internal paper while a member
of the Curtis School, in 1913, under the guidance of Charles Coolidge Parlin.
34 Ibid., pp. 61 and 63. One of Emerson’s points was that women’s periodicals
generally warranted more piano advertising. In terms of counting advertising
‘lines’, the weekly SEP carried more piano (including conventional and player)
advertising than did the LHJ at the time Emerson undertook this study. Emerson’s
data is based on periodicals published during 1911 and 1912.
35 James Parakilas (‘A History of Lessons and Practicing’, in Piano Roles: Three
Hundred Years of Life with the Piano, ed. James Parakilas [New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1999], pp. 135–52) sums up the situation pithily (p. 144): ‘learning
the piano has been like learning to cook: girls did it as a matter of course, whereas
the relatively few boys who did it got the jobs and the glory.’
36 Ruth A. Solie, ‘“Girling” at the Parlor Piano’, in her Music in Other Words
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), pp. 85–117, at p. 89.
37 Ibid., p. 95.
38 I interpret the standing man on the left in Figure 7.2a as a father figure, who plays
a meaningful role in the courtship scene. That he is ‘standing’ gives him a more
active role than the seated woman and child.
39 Solie (‘“Girling” at the Parlor Piano’) focuses on the complexities of these extra-
musical meanings.
40 For more on the ‘“ woman at the piano” motif ’, see Charlotte N. Eyerman, ‘Piano
Playing in Nineteenth-Century French Visual Culture’, Piano Roles, pp. 216–35,
at p. 216. For discussion of Steinway’s advertising strategies, see Cynthia Adams
Hoover, ‘Promoting the Piano’, Piano Roles, pp. 60–7, at pp. 66–7.
41 Solie argues that domestic piano-playing by females (particularly girls) in the
nineteenth century served ‘as an expression of leisure’, which in turn signalled a
father’s ability to support the family materially, and at the same time served ‘as a
form of moral and emotional labor’, in counterbalance with his work outside the
The advertising strategies evident in Figure 7.2 may, for good reason, strike
today’s reader as anachronistic representations of early-twentieth-century
musical life. In fact, beginning around 1910, the attentive Journal reader may
have noticed the declining presence of printed sheet music in the publication, a
trend that would further accelerate in the 1920s following the end of Hofmann’s
‘Piano Questions’ column (in 1917) and Bok’s retirement (in 1919).42 Bonny H.
Miller notes a similar decline in the 1910s across a range of American periodicals,
home (‘“Girling” at the Parlor Piano’, p. 95). Although men’s musical roles appear
limited in the LHJ ads, there is an implication that men provided the means for
pianos and music lessons and – following Solie’s argument – stood to benefit
morally and emotionally from women’s and girls’ domestic piano-playing.
42 Vogel (‘To Put Beauty Into the World’, p. 127) and Miller (‘The Josef Hofmann
Years’, p. 27) discuss the declining presence of sheet music in the Journal.
interpreting the falloff in sheet music as a sign of waning interest in home music-
making and attributing it to rising interest in the player piano and phonograph.43
It is difficult to quantify the frequency with which girls were taking pianos lessons
in the 1910s as compared with generations past; however, Judith Tick frames the
situation around the turn of the twentieth century as a cultural changing of the
guard, as ‘the piano girl slowly gave way to, or at least found a strong competitor
in, the “new woman”.’44 Even as emphasis on girls’ amateur music-making began
to lessen, as Tick showcases, professional opportunities for those women with
genuine interest in various types of musical study expanded.45 These changes fit
within the ongoing American music-appreciation revolution, where amateur
music-making lost ground against preferences for professional (often European
art-music) performance. According to Mark Katz, mechanical instruments
came to be seen as the panacea to the country’s sprawling geography problem
and consequent limited access to professional performances of ‘good’ European
music.46
Although cultural markers in the ads in Figure 7.2 may appear out of step with
early-twentieth-century life, the manner in which such gender norms attached
to the conventional piano resurface in player-piano advertising speaks to their
continued relevance in the 1910s. Player-piano ads capture the strategic effort
involved in creating cultural space for everybody at the instrument, and selling
this discourse of ‘something for everyone’ sometimes involved presenting new
suggestions about music-making with mechanical instruments under the guise
of familiar gender constructs.47 For example, one full-page Aeolian Pianola
ad in a wartime Post issue (Fig. 7.3) prominently features images of an all-male
military band on either side of the caption: ‘“ We’ll Rally ’Round The Flag”[.]
How the message of higher patriotism was brought home to us by the music of
The Pianola’. The ad’s text contains a prolonged first-person account by its male
protagonist, who takes the reader through his emotional experiences, as well as
those of his (mixed-gender) audience, as he plays through a compilation roll titled
‘Bugle Calls and War Songs’. The man confesses, at the roll’s conclusion, that he
is ‘unashamed’ of his ‘choked breath and moist eyes’. His emotional response to
Figure 7.3 Aeolian Company, ‘We’ll Rally ’Round The Flag’, advertisement for Aeolian Pianola,
Saturday Evening Post, 13 October 1917, p. 123 (iconography only) [Courtesy of The University
Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]
making domestic music at the player piano appears legitimized, literally under
a banner of patriotism and within culturally acceptable modes of male music-
making.48 A handful of player-piano ads also evoke a rather traditional perception
of femininity. One Baldwin Manualo ad (with text only) provocatively titled ‘The
Mother who had to Give up her Practice’ reads:
In her youth her friends said that she was destined for a musical career. But
she chose the far greater vocation of marriage and soon the care of family
and home left her little time for practice. Now her fingers have lost their
cunning, but her musical feeling, ripened and sweetened by the trials and
triumphs of wife and mother, is more insistent for expression than ever. […]
She must have an instrument that is as plastic to her subtlest wishes as her
own piano was in the years gone by.49
The association of conventional-piano-playing with girlhood, the elevation of
motherhood and domesticity, and even the subject’s rejection of a professional
musical life for the sake of her family all fit neatly within a gendered
conventional-piano discourse; but now, these ideas are positioned to do the work
of promoting (with the help of an imaginative simile) the twentieth-century player
piano.
Emphasis on access to music for the whole family pervaded the Post and
Journal. ‘You can search the whole world over and not find another gift that will
bring so much pleasure to every member of the family’ declared a 1914 Victrola
phonograph ad in the Journal, while a 1917 advertisement for inexpensive Century
Edition sheet music in the Post framed its budget product with the slogan:
48 Aeolian Company, ‘We’ll Rally ’Round The Flag’, SEP, 13 October 1917, p. 123.
49 Baldwin Piano Company, ‘The Mother who had to Give up her Practice’,
advertisement, SEP, 12 May 1917, p. 58.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Figure 7.4 Family music-making at the player piano in Saturday Evening Post advertising
(iconography only) [Courtesy of The University Library, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign]
(a) Gulbransen-Dickinson Company, ‘Nationally Priced’, 31 March 1917, p. 70
(b) Gulbransen-Dickinson Company, ‘What Should a Truly Fine Player-Piano Cost?’, 13
October 1917, p. 48 (for Gulbransen-Dickinson ‘White House’ model)
(c) Baldwin Piano Company, ‘Everybody in Your Family was born to play the Baldwin
Manualo’, 18 November 1916, p. 56 (for Baldwin Manualo)
(d) Baldwin Piano Company, ‘Your Christmas Spirit in Every Note’, 1 December 1917,
p. 76 (for Baldwin Manualo)
(e) Hallet & Davis Piano Co., ‘America’, 21 February 1914, p. 35 (for Hallet & Davis
Virtuolo)
‘Good Music Is Meant For All.’ 50 Player-piano ads focusing on the entire family
(Fig. 7.4) also show a link between commercial goals and the music-appreciation
emphasis on democratic access. Gulbransen-Dickinson’s iconic image of a baby
operating the foot pedals of its player-piano model (Fig. 7.4a) visualizes its claims
for effortless technical operation. In addition to communicating technological
accessibility, text from a Baldwin Manualo player-piano ad (Fig. 7.4c) broadly
appeals to each family member in turn, validating the social prescriptions keeping
each – for distinct and clichéd reasons – from spending arduous time practising
music ‘by hand’ at the conventional piano:
Matter-of-fact father who never has been accused of possessing musical
talent, musical mother who gave up her practice because of family
cares, fun-loving youngsters who rebel at taking lessons, and dear old
grandparents who think they are past the age for musical activity. […]
Everybody in your family was born to play the Manualo in the same sense
that the virtuoso was born to play the piano.
Playing the conventional piano is the domain of the virtuoso, but the Manualo
is the domain of the whole family equally; this ad thus distances the everyday
amateur from music-making at the conventional piano while emphasizing the
level playing field offered by the player piano.
Men and families were central to conventional-piano mythology in the
American Victorian parlour, participating as audience, moral and social
beneficiary, and critical ‘other’ to young people, (mostly) women, at pianos (as in
the ads in Fig. 7.2). In contrast, images of music-making at the player piano in the
Post (Fig. 7.4) present performance opportunities without regard to age or gender,
with Figures 7.4b, 7.4d and 7.4e specifically preserving key hallmarks of middle-
class status central to the conventional piano’s cultural identity. This relationship
between conventional-piano and player-piano advertising iconography on
one level supports Roell’s argument that player-piano marketing depicted how
everyone (and men in particular) could ‘intimately share the accompanying
mythology’ that surrounded the nineteenth-century Victorian (conventional)
piano.51 However, images and text in Post player-piano advertisements show
how, rather than simply extending this ‘accompanying mythology’, the use,
repurposing and shuffling of established stereotypes and gender norms in
player-piano advertising sometimes significantly altered the dynamics depicted
50 Victor Talking Machine Company, ‘Will there be a Victrola in your home this
Christmas?’ advertisement, LHJ, December 1914, end matter; and Century Music
Publishing Co., ‘Good Music Is Meant For All’, advertisement, SEP, 10 November
1917, p. 41. As Vogel (‘To Put Beauty Into the World’, pp. 128–30) discusses, this
discourse also links to ‘child-centred’ music content in the Journal in the early
1900s, which included music and dance selections aimed at children and articles
describing age-appropriate approaches to teaching music fundamentals. Although
not discussed in this chapter, piano manufacturer Hallet & Davis sometimes
featured children in its 1910s conventional-piano advertising placed in the LHJ as
well as in the SEP.
51 Roell, The Piano, p. 154.
56 William Braid White, The Player-Pianist (New York: Edward Lyman Bill, 1910), p. 58.
57 Dolge, Pianos, p. 160.
58 Baldwin Piano Company, ‘As Instinctive as the Song of the Nightingale’,
advertisement, SEP, 30 October 1915, p. 31.
59 Baldwin Piano Company, ‘The Manualo: The Instrument You Were Born to Play’,
advertisement, SEP, 17 March 1917, p. 53.
company defined as ‘copy which points out the inferiority of competitors’ goods,
in contrast with the superiority of the advertiser’s’. ‘The Curtis Advertising Code’,
p. 12, CP Box 152, Folder 132.
65 See Katz, Capturing Sound, p. 4, for a discussion of the relationship between
‘existing technologies’ and those that attempt to replace them.
66 Gulbransen-Dickinson Company, ‘What Should a Truly Fine Player-Piano Cost?’,
SEP, 13 October 1917, p. 48; Aeolian Company, ‘A Story of an Evening with the
Pianola’.
67 ‘Music Ex Machina’, Atlantic Monthly, November 1913, pp. 714–16, at p. 714, also
cited in Roell, The Piano, p. 37.
68 Gustav Kobbé, The Pianolist (New York: Moffat, Yard, 1907), p. 18.
69 Wizard Products Co., ‘It’s Kind To Fine Furniture’, advertisement, LHJ, August
1915, p. 47; Monroe Refrigerator Co., ‘Select a Refrigerator As You Would a Piano’,
advertisement, LHJ, March 1916, p. 94.
For faithful readers of the Journal, reminders of the conventional piano’s object
status came nearly monthly within ads placed by mid-level manufacturer Ivers
& Pond. This company’s ads consistently featured a rotating set of conventional-
piano models accompanied by picturesque young women, emphasizing the
visual display (of pianos and women) over music-making (see Fig. 7.5). Although
sometimes women are shown actually playing the piano in the Ivers & Pond
ads, often they are not, and the occasional omissions of benches (as in Fig. 7.5b)
present the pictured female models as complementary, pretty objects more than
as music-makers. Superlative-heavy text accompanying these and other Ivers &
Pond ads emphasizes craftsmanship and reputation, with vague references to
‘tone’ and sometimes allusion to how the month’s featured model might physically
fit into a given space (see Fig. 7.5a).
Conclusions
The primary goal of advertisements placed in the Ladies’ Home Journal and the
Saturday Evening Post was to sell products, and final speculation about how and
where piano ads appeared in the Curtis publications must consider how piano
manufacturers and ad agencies likely perceived the two periodicals and their
readerships in relation to the products they sought to advertise. The numerous
studies by Curtis’s Division of Commercial Research help us understand how
the publisher presented its magazines to manufacturers, while the interviews,
which played a key role in some of those studies, offer valuable first-hand insights
into manufacturers’ and merchants’ perspectives on the two magazines (albeit,
filtered through the Division). In particular, interview excerpts from a 1916 study
titled ‘Attitude Toward The Ladies’ Home Journal and The Saturday Evening
Post as Advertising Mediums’ provide a sense of how merchants perceived
the magazines.71 Examples of merchants doubting the value of placing ads in
the Journal, scattered among the predominantly positive comments, highlight
viewpoints potentially shared by piano advertisers. Particularly compelling,
especially given the family focus commonly found in player-piano advertising,
are repeated declarations of the Post’s superior advertising potential – since the
magazine would likely reach all adult members of the family. One enthusiastic
70 In his ‘Pianos, Organs and Player Pianos’ (p. 71), Emerson ranked Steinway and
Kranich & Bach alike as ‘high grade’ piano manufacturers.
71 ‘Attitude Toward The Ladies’ Home Journal and The Saturday Evening Post as
Advertising Mediums’, typescript, 1916, CP Box 45.
respondent’s own estimate that ‘75% of the women who read the Journal [also]
read the Post’ led him to declare the Post the more logical, farthest reaching mode
of advertising.72 Speculations might also be drawn from opinions on automobile
advertising, a sector of advertising disproportionately represented in the Post
despite the Division’s efforts to convince manufacturers of a women’s market.73
Tucked between several affirmative views in the 1916 study is one auto-dealer’s
suspicion that a man would ‘be prejudiced against what he sees advertised in a
woman’s paper’. 74 Another respondent proclaimed that the Post ‘reaches the
majority of people [i.e. men] who will buy machines’.75 Both of these comments
speak to the logic that may have led piano manufacturers to avoid using Bok’s
conservative women’s magazine for their player-piano lines, especially as the
broad appeal of their products depended on overcoming associations between
women, the piano and domestic music-making.
The contents of the Journal in the 1910s show the player piano in uncertain
terrain, complicated by changing views of domestic music-making at the
conventional piano. The diminishing presence of sheet music in the magazine
suggests a steady decline in amateur music-making taking place across American
parlours, a decline that was evidenced in part by falling conventional-piano
sales across the 1910s and 1920s.76 Within 1912, the Journal ran an editorial and
an article in support of mechanical music, even as Hofmann later spoke in his
column against ragtime (which player pianos helped popularize) and playing
by ear.77 That there was concern at Curtis over the future place of pianos in the
women’s magazine is clear, and when questioned on this point at Curtis’s 1915
advertising conference, editor Bok explained that an inquiry by a Journal music
editor (perhaps Hofmann himself ) showed an upswing in piano interest ‘in
spite of the prevalence of mechanical music’.78 More broadly than this, however,
is the more subtle, sustained image of the Journal as a periodical that favoured
normative roles for women and that continued to present the conventional piano
as a cultural marker specifically relevant to women’s lives.
Piano manufacturers and ad agencies may have considered any of these ideas
when choosing the family-friendly Post for their player lines. Although player-
piano promotion clearly borrowed from conventional-piano mythology so
familiar to the Journal, several of its key tenets were challenged by the influence
of musical democratization, the shifted locus of musicality and the changing
purpose behind piano ownership promoted in these advertisements. A changing
idea of music and music-making tied to the player piano looms large, obscured
by a combination of cultural references to the conventional piano and the
declaration – achieved by images and text – that player-piano performances had
the potential to be visceral, personal and artistic.
Sitting down with the latest edition of the Post in early December 1917, the
eyes of an average reader might have been drawn to the heading ‘What the
Pianola Means to the Home’ in a full-page ad for the Aeolian Pianola player piano.
Although the turn of phrase referenced values bound up in nineteenth-century
conventional-piano mythology, the text following it continued in a decidedly
twentieth-century manner, grandly promising: ‘And you will play – you will have
the sense of playing, feel the fascination of it. You will shortly become in a way an
artist yourself.’ 79
B ritish music history has long acknowledged the centrality of pianos, brass
bands and choral singing to Victorian life. But the significance of a ‘perfect
craze for learning the fiddle’, as the music educator and writer Frederick Corder
put it (in 1922), and its intersections with the world of commerce are relatively
unexplored, despite important recent work on specific aspects of the topic.1 It
must be said straightaway that the word ‘fiddle’ has long been used in Britain as
an affectionate synonym for the classical violin, and not merely to distinguish
a folk instrument. So what is under discussion here – and what Corder was
referring to – is the playing of the classical violin, the instrument that has taken
an intrinsic role in art music’s repertoires and traditions.2 The main facts are as
follows. During the 1880s and 1890s, a new interest in the instruments of the
violin family emerged among a wide slice of the British population. The surge
in activity, which lasted at least into the 1920s, broke longstanding barriers of
gender and class;3 it was underpinned by changing social and cultural values; and
it was articulated and supported by a growing commercial infrastructure. In sum,
violins, and to a lesser extent cellos and violas (and double basses) – instruments
with notable expressive potential and great beauty as objects – became all
the rage.
1 Frederick Corder, A History of the Royal Academy of Music from 1822 to 1922
(London: F. Corder, 1922), p. 84, speaking of the 1890s. The most notable
discussions, to which this essay is indebted, are Ehrlich, The Music Profession in
Britain, pp. 156–61; Paula Gillett, Musical Women in England, 1870–1914:
‘Encroaching on All Man’s Privileges’ (London: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 77–140;
Brian W. Harvey, The Violin Family and its Makers in the British Isles: An
Illustrated History and Directory (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995); David J. Golby,
Instrumental Teaching in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Aldershot: Ashgate,
2004); and Simon McVeigh, ‘“As the sand on the sea shore”: Women Violinists
in London’s Concert Life around 1900’, Essays on the History of English Music in
Honour of John Caldwell: Sources, Style, Performance, Historiography, ed. Emma
Hornby and David Maw (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2010), pp. 232–58.
2 ‘Fiddle’ could also carry derogatory social and musical connotations; see Golby,
Instrumental Teaching, pp. 146–7.
3 Corder (A History, p. 84), however, considered the craze had lasted only ‘about ten
years’.
178
What seems remarkable is the speed with which this ‘violin culture’4 took off,
and the change in musical life that it embodied, at both professional and amateur
levels. Contemporaries commented often on the novelty and pervasiveness
of the new craze, as ever more people were spotted out and about with their
instruments. The writer Gerard Eliot Hodgkin had this to say in the Strad
magazine in 1894:
During the last dozen years London has changed its appearance in
many ways; not only in the fashion of its streets but also in the aspect of
those who throng them. It is not merely that the clothes of 1894 differ
considerably from the clothes of 1880 – there is also a difference in the foot-
passengers’ articles of portable property. Especially notable is the enormous
increase in the number of music portfolios and fiddle-cases carried.5
Another journalist (in the Literary World) noted ‘the number of coffin-shaped
boxes one is privileged to knock one’s knees against now-a-days when travelling
up and down on suburban [railway] lines’.6 However, as Hodgkin recognized, for
all that the ranks of professional string-players were increasing steadily, the centre
of growth was, as he put it, ‘en amateur’. 7
Observers also remarked, often at length, that much of the expansion involved
middle-class women. Up to this point their domestic music-making had been
restricted to piano-playing or singing, and string-playing had been a masculine
activity, undertaken unobtrusively as a leisure pursuit in Britain only by wealthy
men, and as a job of work by men mostly on the cusp of the lower and middle
classes.8 Yet, as Paula Gillett has shown, from the 1870s, as social and cultural
taboos governing the gendering of string instruments crumbled, the violin world
became inhabited by both men and women.9 Similar developments took hold in
other parts of Europe and North America around the same time, to judge from
existing research in women’s music history. Judith Tick’s title for her 1986 essay
‘Passed Away Is the Piano Girl’ neatly evokes some of the cultural change that
the violin ushered into the United States, while Margaret Myers’s findings about
Damenorchestern in German-speaking central Europe from c. 1870 into the 1940s
suggest that the acceptability of middle-class women playing the violin was a
general European phenomenon.10
The new violinists in Britain – probably elsewhere too – included learners
from working-class backgrounds. Among the labouring classes, men seem to
have been especially eager to play: Manchester-based pianist and conductor
Charles Hallé remarked in 1890 that ‘in Sheffield alone over five hundred working
men are students of the violin.’11 There was also significant involvement by state-
school children (male and female), including some from working-class families.12
By 1907, William McNaught, who had served the government for several years
as assistant inspector of music education in schools, reported an estimated 10%
of English pupils were receiving violin tuition in elementary state schools.13 That
would have meant at least 400,000 child learners, many from lower-income
brackets.14 Yet as social historian Dave Russell points out, citing McNaught,
working-class pupils were typically drawn from the middle and upper bands of
the labouring classes, given the costs involved, and ‘the poorest were excluded’.15
10 Judith Tick, ‘Passed Away Is the Piano Girl: Changes in American Musical Life,
1870–1900’, Women Making Music: The Western Art Tradition, 1150–1950, ed. Jane
Bowers and Judith Tick (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1986), pp. 325–48;
Margaret Myers, ‘Searching for Data about European Ladies’ Orchestras, 1870–
1950’, Music and Gender, ed. Pirkko Moisala and Beverley Diamond (Urbana:
University of Illinois Press, 2000), pp. 189–213.
11 Hallé quoted in T. H. Hardman, ‘The Violin Collection of G. Haddock’, Appendix
I in Haddock’s Some Early Musical Recollections of G. Haddock, 3rd edn (London:
Schott, 1906), pp. 131–55, at p. 131. The essay reprints material that Haddock says
was written ‘for one of the journals issued in 1890’.
12 For readers who are unfamiliar with the British education system and its history,
private, independently run schools (where education was paid for) are referred to
also as ‘public’ schools. Education that was financed by the government took place
in what are called ‘state’ schools (not public schools).
13 Russell, Popular Music, p. 54, citing material in School Music Review, 1 July 1907,
p. 21. These statistics are also stated in School Music Review, 1 May 1909, p. 253.
For a useful assessment of McNaught, see David Wright, ‘The Music Exams of the
Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, 1859–1919’,
Music and Institutions in Nineteenth-Century Britain, ed. Paul Rodmell (Farnham:
Ashgate, 2012), pp. 161–80, at pp. 174–5.
14 This figure (stated in the reports in School Music Review, cited above) is borne
out by my own calculations, using 1911 population statistics for children in
England and Wales aged 5–11 (5.1 million; information from Office for National
Statistics, based on the Census for England and Wales, 1911; vol. 7, table 1). The
figure of 400,000 would equate to 10% of 4 million English children (a deliberately
conservative total that eliminates Welsh children from the calculation and allows
for some distortions in the data).
15 Russell, Popular Music, p. 55. The topic of state-school tuition is discussed in
greater depth on pp. 186–7 below.
20 This narrative expands on the introductory section of my ‘Hidden Agendas and the
Creation of Community: The Violin Press in the Late Nineteenth Century’, Music
and Performance Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain, pp. 11–35.
21 For further discussion of the impact of free trade on instrument provision, see Harvey,
The Violin Family, p. 128, and Ehrlich, The Music Profession in Britain, pp. 100–2.
22 Edward Heron-Allen, ‘Violin Family’, Grove’s Dictionary of Music and Musicians,
ed. J. A. Fuller Maitland, 2nd edn (London and New York: Macmillan, 1904–10),
vol. 5, p. 308, citing a statement made in the early 1880s by the maker Thibouville-
Lamy (of Mirecourt, Paris and London) regarding the itemized cost and profit
margin of one of his cheapest violins.
23 Based on the nominal wage for a skilled textile worker in 1891; in Jeffrey G.
Williamson, ‘The Structure of Pay in Britain, 1710–1911’, Research in Economic
History 7 (1982), 1–54, at p. 48.
24 Amounts based on prices stated in Ehrlich, The Piano, p. 91, and Herbert, The
British Brass Band, p. 309.
25 Leopold Auer, Violin Playing as I Teach it (London: Duckworth, 1921), p. 6. The
book was also published in New York, but it appears that Auer’s comments are
mostly drawn from his experiences in Europe. He visited London many times.
26 On the varied facets of running a violin business, see John Dilworth, Andrew
Fairfax and John Milnes, The Voller Brothers: Victorian Violin Makers (Oxford:
British Violin Making Association, 2006).
it seems that by 1900, decent-quality violins – whether new or second hand –
typically came with price tags from about £4 to £15.27 Exquisite old instruments,
such as Strads and Amatis, retailed for considerably more, though nothing like
the astronomical prices paid today.28 Among the buyers of old violins were
wealthy (male) collectors, some of whom fetishized them as objects for display,
ensuring such instruments were rarely if ever sounded.29
The violin trade flourished across Britain, in towns large and small. London had
its celebrated community of luthiers in Soho, but there was much commerce in
other parts of the capital and beyond it, as a snapshot of violin-making and -selling
in the northern industrial city of Leeds suggests. Of the eleven makers and retailers
known to have advertised their services in Kelly’s trade directory for Leeds between
1880 and 1920, six had significant national reputations: Joseph Wade, Dearlove &
Sons, James W. Briggs, J. W. Owen, Albert E. Warrick and L. P. Balmforth; the
other five were, it seems, small-time makers, doubtless servicing the lower end
of the market with repair work and the sale of cheap imported instruments.30
Owen advertised in local newspapers and even some concert programmes, in
the manner associated with piano dealers, suggesting much about the nature and
the pervasiveness of the new culture.31 The advertisement in Figure 8.1 is from a
1905 chamber-concert programme booklet; it promotes Owen’s instruments as a
blend of superior quality, antiqueness, costliness and exclusivity. Meanwhile, laced
into the trade was a culture of fraudulent practices, stemming from demand for
old instruments being high and supply sorely limited. Many makers produced
copies of old Italian violins or built composite instruments and passed them off
27 Data assembled from the ‘exchange and mart’ columns and classified
advertisements in the Strad. On the problems in ascertaining prices charged for
instruments (as opposed to prices advertised), see Harvey, The Violin Family,
pp. 129–35. Issues include inflation, economies of scale and changes in real value
over time.
28 According to Heron-Allen (‘Violin Family’, p. 309), prices for fine violins increased
hugely even between the first two editions of Grove’s dictionary (1889 and 1910).
He claimed an Amati could, in 1910, have a market value of £50– £1,000; a Strad,
£600– c. £2,000.
29 H[ugh] R[eginald] Haweis, Old Violins and Violin Lore (London: William Reeves,
[1923]), p. 11. Like Haweis, Haddock did not object to the instruments and bows
being used, and he even loaned them to great players (see Hardman, ‘The Violin
Collection’, pp. 131–44).
30 Several of the makers are listed in Harvey, The Violin Family, p. 403 and
directory entries. The less significant operators were J. K. Heaps, S. B. Wilkinson,
Alfred Priestley, L. T. Chambers and Alfred Warrick (son of A. E. Warrick).
Information taken from extant volumes of Kelly’s Directory in Leeds Central
Library; a complete run was not available for inspection. The picture is far from
comprehensive, since some makers classified themselves as musical-instrument
makers or dealers, not violin-makers per se; and general instrument-sellers
probably carried cheap violins too.
31 For instance, in the Yorkshire Post, 8 March 1913: here Owen advertises as a
‘Repairer and Dealer’. Repair work was clearly a significant tranche of a business, as
Owen’s (and others’) advertisements in the Strad further indicate.
Figure 8.1
Advertisement for J. W.
Owen’s violin business,
from the programme
booklet for the Leeds
Bohemian Concerts,
15 March 1905 [Courtesy
of Leeds Library and
Information Service].
These chamber concerts
probably attracted
many well-heeled music
aficionados.
as originals by inserting fake labels inside them, and then offered them for sale at
high prices. Such goings-on were causes for concern among buyers, generating
heated public discussion and a need for consumer advice.32
Another crucial aspect of ‘supply’ was tuition, delivered either in an
institutional setting or a private studio. The ‘public’ (i.e. in Britain, private, often
boarding) schools started offering lessons on the violin (and to a lesser extent, the
cello) in the second half of the nineteenth century.33 These learners were, self-
evidently, children from privileged backgrounds, and in boys’ schools they were
32 For further discussion, see Brian W. Harvey and Carla J. Shapreau, Violin Fraud:
Deception, Forgery, Theft and Lawsuits in England and America, 2nd edn (Oxford:
Clarendon, 1997), pp. 3–100.
33 Lessons were typically given to children individually in such schools (see School
Music Review, 1 March 1907, p. 177), on an elective basis. (It seems likely that
parents paid additional fees for such tuition, but more research is needed to
be certain.) With the teaching of the cello, it became possible for school string
orchestras to be formed. More advanced violinists probably learned to double on
the viola, as was common practice within the music profession.
38 For more information, see K. Adams, ‘Violin Classes: Their Part in English Adult
Education’, Strad, April 1960, pp. 440–3; May 1960, pp. 15–19; and June 1960,
pp. 73–9.
39 Birkbeck’s classes cost more than those in Manchester and Birmingham,
suggesting that they attracted people with more disposable income. In the 1890s,
lessons at Birkbeck were paid for termly, at a fee of 5s for twelve weekly evening
lessons for members; non-members paid more (7s); information from the calendar
of the Birkbeck Literary and Scientific Institution for 1896/7, in the Archives of
Birkbeck College, University of London. On Birkbeck students’ socio-economic
profiles, see C. Delisle Burns, A Short History of Birkbeck College (London:
University of London Press, 1924), pp. 41–2.
40 For contemporary criticism of group learning, see ‘Violin Classes’, The Fiddler, 15
March 1887, pp. 21–2.
41 The teachers were Martin Walton, a classical violinist and professional musician,
and the celebrated folk fiddler Frank O’Higgins. The topic was explored in a paper
I read at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Musicological Society, ‘“ If
I practice I can make a fair show”: The Power of the Violin in the Ballykinlar
Internment Camp during the Anglo-Irish War (1919–21)’.
42 See Robin K. Deverich, ‘The Maidstone Movement – Influential British Precursor
of American Public School Instrumental Classes’, Journal of Research in Music
Education 35 (1987), 39–55, and Russell, Popular Music, p. 54. Deverich dates the
start-up at 1897; Russell gives 1898. See also the commentary in School Music
Review, 1 May 1909, p. 253, and 1 July 1909, p. 177. Pupils were taught outside of
normal classes, typically in the lunchtime recess. Tuition was mostly on the violin;
there were calls for the viola and cello to be more widely taught.
‘Maidstone Scheme’ (so named after the town in Kent that first supported the
experiment in its schools) had supplied materials for over eleven years to some
400,000 boys and girls in more than 5,000 elementary schools.43 The instruments
were sold with a ‘Maidstone’ label, and accessories were branded accordingly.
More generally, the music publishing and retail trade was a core component
of violin culture, and most publishers carried string music and tuition material
in their catalogues. Further, some firms issued materials to meet the consumer
needs that were created by the new, commercially run examination boards. A
unique feature of British musical life from the late nineteenth century, exam
boards sold the certified testing of instrumental skills and in practice categorized
the practical attainment of pupils and the competencies of teachers across the
country. It should come as no surprise, given the growing numbers of string
students, that the violin loomed large in the boards’ syllabi and that exams
were highly popular – or that an important byproduct of the initiative was
the standardization of learning and repertoire for generations of students (or
at least those whose families could afford for them to take the tests). The most
widespread exam schemes were allied to the conservatoires, notably those run
from London by Trinity College of Music (which offered practical exams – violin
was one of the instruments offered for testing – from 1879) and the Associated
Board of the Royal Schools of Music (from 1890); their cultural significance
is, as David Wright has demonstrated, hard to overstate.44 Violin exams were
also conducted by the Royal Society of Arts, which had a much more artisan
and working-class clientele, and the College of Violinists.45 The latter was
established in 1890 as a national examining body, not a training academy, and
was initially concerned with certifying string teachers (a pressing concern,
given the growth of demand). In the marketplace the College, which has been
described as functioning as a ‘friendly society’ and making little profit,46 claimed
the moral high ground by guaranteeing all its examiners were violinists. This
feature sat in contradistinction to what was offered by the other exam schemes,
where breadth of ‘product’ (in terms of the instruments for which they sold
examinations) and the logistics of national exams with travelling examiners had
led to situations whereby a violin student might be tested by a musician without
string-playing expertise. Like all the exam boards, the College provided a ladder
of exams, increasing in difficulty and cost, up to diploma level – at which point
a violinist was deemed to have the technical proficiency of a professional player
43 School Music Review, 1 May 1909, p. 253; reported in Russell, Popular Music,
p. 54 (with some errors). The violins were probably half- and three-quarter-sized
instruments, appropriate for children. For photographs of such violin groups, see
Russell, plate section, fig. 8, and Christina Bashford, ‘Class of 1890’, Strad, May
2010, pp. 26–9, at p. 26.
44 On the Associated Board and competitor exams, see David C. H. Wright, The
Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music: A Social and Cultural History
(Woodbridge: Boydell, 2013).
45 On the Royal Society of Arts exams specifically, see Wright, ‘The Music Exams’.
46 Wright, The Associated Board, p. 57.
47 Diplomas were offered by the other exam boards; for more on their market
positions and credibility, see Wright, The Associated Board, pp. 55–60. On the
College of Violinists’ relationships with the principal violin magazines, see
Bashford, ‘Hidden Agendas’, pp. 19–33.
48 For instance, Eugène Polonaski, Violin Scales & Arpeggi for Candidates Preparing
for the College of Violinists’ Examinations (London: St Cecilia Music Publishing
Co., [1892]); J. Harold Henry and E. M. Barber, The Violin: A Few Facts for the
Use of Students Preparing for the Examinations of the College of Violinists (Derby:
Bewley & Roe, 1893); and Basil Althaus, 36 Violin Studies, ‘Written Expressly for
Students Preparing for the Junior Grades of the College of Violinists, London’, op. 78
(London: Schott, [1905]).
49 McVeigh, ‘“As the sand”’, p. 232.
50 On Lady Hallé (Wilma Norman Neruda) as a catalyst for changing attitudes, see
Gillett’s thoughtful argument in Musical Women, pp. 79–82 and 98. The idea of
the acoustic mirror (alluding to the use of Jacques Lacan’s concepts in cinema
studies) is posited in Nancy Newman’s discussion of Jenny Lind and Camilla Urso
as soloists in American concert life: ‘Gender and the Germanians: “Art-Loving
Ladies” in Nineteenth-Century Concert Life’, American Orchestras in the
Nineteenth Century, ed. John Spitzer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012),
pp. 289–309, at pp. 299–300.
51 On musical life before recordings, see Robert Philip, Performing Music in the Age
of Recording (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004), pp. 4–12.
bands for women, a striking part of the middle-class landscape. Elgar tried out
his Serenade for strings (1892) with his Ladies Orchestral Class in Worcester,52
and Parry wrote Lady Radnor’s Suite (1894) for Lady Radnor’s amateur ladies’
string band. Some groups mixed men and women, increasingly so in the early
1900s, and they often levied a membership subscription to hire a conductor. Also,
according to Russell, there was ‘a far greater working-class presence in amateur
orchestras than has [traditionally] been assumed’; his examples include the
Rothwell Orchestral Society, ‘centred on a pit village south-east of Leeds’, which
in 1896 comprised thirteen miners, seven of whom were in the string section.53
Violinists seeking information about concerts, examinations, amateur
activities and professional openings could, and certainly did, turn to the
magazines that were published for string-players. Nine titles came onto the
market from 1884 to 1914, seemingly more than for any other specialist area of
music-making at that time, including piano; three of them, retailing at 2d an issue,
enjoyed some longevity: The Strad (1890–; still published today), The Violin Times
(1893–1913) and The Gazette of the College of Violinists (1914–39; from March
1921 titled The Violinists’ Gazette: The Official Organ of the College of Violinists).
Content ranged from tips on playing, buying and collecting instruments, as well
as on identifying fake ones, to substantial features addressed to amateur and
professional players; yet also central to reader appeal and economic viability was
the printing of advertisements for goods, events and services. By 1910, the Strad
was awash with ads large and small for dealers and repairers, as well as for many
‘branded’ accessories – strings, pegs, chin-rests, bridges and other paraphernalia
(often endorsed by famous artists) – along with tutor books, music, lessons and
exam schemes.54 Considerable book publishing about violins, much of it from
the press of William Reeves, supplemented the magazine industry, with some
titles being further serialized in periodicals.55 Taken together, the number and
the diversity of commercial goods underpinning and feeding violin culture were
nothing short of remarkable, as was the speed with which they had arrived on the
musical scene in Britain. It should also be said that as a means of documenting
these markets, violin magazines are a particularly illuminating and crucial
resource.
68 Leon Rosenstein, Antiques: The History of an Idea (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 2009), esp. pp. 123–32. See also his definition of an antique as something of
beauty and rarity, as well as of age (ibid., p. 26).
69 Crafted objects were thus a means for people to imagine their ancestors in a
wholesome, sanitized and ultimately valuable light. See Rosenstein, Antiques,
pp. 125–8.
70 Heron-Allen, ‘Violin Family’, p. 308.
71 Harvey, The Violin Family, p. 124. David Schoenbaum (The Violin: A Social History
of the World’s Most Versatile Instrument [New York: W. W. Norton, 2013], p. 75)
states that Mittenwald was producing 25,000–30,000 instruments annually,
around 1900.
72 Strad, January 1904, p. 258.
Meanwhile, most of the dealers who advertised in the violin press had
professional players and collectors in their sights, and highlighted the high end
of their operations, either the importing of older (foreign) violins or the making
by hand and selling of their own new ones. Most instruments, whether genuine
or fake, were promoted as superior models, and many a wealthy learner was
probably tempted to buy a pricey ‘older’ instrument in the hope that it would
improve his or her playing. It is striking too that when expensive instruments
were at stake, the tendency was to mask the ‘dirty’ commercial dimension,
avoiding mention of price altogether (allowing scope for negotiation between
buyer and seller), thus establishing a sense of exclusivity around the goods.73
Furthermore, by emphasizing the quality of construction and an instrument’s
rarity and age, advertising created for these instruments a distinctive character,
one that mass-produced products, in comparison, so glaringly lacked. To these
ends, most copywriters showcased the aesthetic value, in terms of sound, that
traditional high-status craftsmanship embodied. Connection to a master-
maker (name recognition was a signal part of the process) was also well worth
vaunting: Paul Bailly, a London maker, advertised as a pupil of G. B. [i.e., Jean-
Baptiste] Vuillaume (a significant French maker), boldly guaranteeing the sonority
of his instruments.74 Restoration work was likewise hyped as done to the best
craftsman’s standards. Thomas Hesketh in Manchester, for example, promoted
his specialism as ‘Repairing Old Instruments in the most careful manner’.75
In the case of new, hand-built instruments, contemporary makers often
spotlighted their adoption of tools or techniques used by master craftsmen. For
instance, varnishes made to old Cremona recipes were said to ensure a pure
and rich tone (Atkinson of London), ‘Sound-post and Bridge Fittings [were said
to be] done by an Original Superior Method’ (Owen of Leeds), and one maker
(George Buckman of Dover) insisted that all his instruments were ‘hand made
from choice old wood’ [emphasis in original].76 In other words, makers positioned
themselves in the historical continuum of master craftsmen, even though
the instruments they made were never exact replicas of old Strads or Amatis,
inasmuch as they took on design modifications that had since come into being
in pursuit of a more powerful, brighter sound: changes to neck and fingerboard
length and design, increased string tension, heavier bass bars and so on.77 Thus,
73 Some issues of price and value in antique goods are covered in Rosenstein,
Antiques, pp. 186–8; also relevant here is what Christopher Herbert describes as
the Victorians’ ‘panicky dread of indelicate references to money matters’ in his
wide-ranging analysis in ‘Filthy Lucre: Victorian Ideas of Money’, Victorian Studies
44 (2002), 185–213, at p. 199.
74 Strad, September 1890, p. 105.
75 Strad, January 1893, p. 162.
76 Strad, May 1893, p. 15, and October 1892, pp. 101 and 102.
77 See Harvey, The Violin Family, pp. 62–5. The modern ‘Tourte’ bow was part of the
revolution. Note that older violins were adapted to bring them in line with modern
design (David D. Boyden and Peter Walls, ‘Violin, I, 4: History and Repertory,
1600–1820’, The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd edn, ed.
Stanley Sadie [London: Macmillan, 2001]; vol. 26, p. 715).
Figure 8.2 Advertisement for ‘Cathedral’ strings, a product of British Music Strings, Ltd.,
from The Violinists’ Gazette, October 1922 [Copyright © The British Library Board, All
rights reserved, General Reference Collection, P. P. 1946 Gab]
anyone purchasing a cheap factory fiddle or accessories from a violin shop (and
notably many reputable dealers carried trade fiddles as well as fine violins) was
being invited to buy into the antique-cum-artisan aura that was being created
around the instrument. The selling of strings gives another sense of how these
principles worked in practice, although here the paradoxes are lessened, since this
part of the industry had not bowed to mechanical processes to the same extent
that the violin had.78 A 1922 advertisement for gut strings (Fig. 8.2) projects the
idea of the British master craftsman who has spent a lifetime at his job; he is
pictured in an apron, albeit clasping a manufactured paper packet containing a
string.79 Here we also see the patriotic card being played, though not in such an
overtly anti-German way as it had been during World War I by the British Violin-
Makers’ Guild, which actively promoted the use of raw materials from home
markets, to prevent ‘the Hun’ from ‘restor[ing …] his commerce and the next
great opportunity of Prussianising the world’.80
Figure 8.3 Advertisement for John Broadhouse’s book The Art of Fiddle-Making (London:
Haynes, 1894), from Strings, July 1894, p. 159 [Courtesy of the Sibley Music Library,
Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester]
violins.84 Yet the connections are suggestive, especially as they play out in the
commercial arena, where the image of the violin family functions in various ways:
for instance, this image emphasizes the instruments’ materiality and origins
in the working world; it toys with the notion of the traditional craftsman; and
it stresses links to the past and the high quality of the product. Such a take is
hardly surprising given the nature of violin construction, and it aligns with the
general turn-of-the century tendency to revere antique goods. But it also chimes
suggestively with Arts and Crafts ideals. Also, we know the violin craze was
much fuelled by the retailing of instruments with origins in factory processes;
yet around the idea of the violin a general ideology emerged that downplayed
the instrument’s commercial dimension and ignored its debt to the machine age,
suggesting tensions and contradictions similar to those that art historians have
noted in British Arts and Crafts culture. The movement’s leader William Morris –
despite his belief that capitalism’s use of machinery oppressed and dehumanized
workers’ lives – had his wallpapers printed by machines and used photography
to aid textile design, facts he surely kept quiet about.85 Further, although the
movement idealized rural craftsmanship, most Arts and Crafts people were based
in cities, not the countryside. The same could be said of many violin-makers.86
Although these ideological undercurrents are compelling in their own terms,
they may also help explicate the growth of violin culture. For it may well be that,
in choosing to purchase and pursue string instruments over instruments such as
pianos or brass – which were emblematic of industrialization – many would-be
musicians were tuning in, on some level (maybe subliminally), to a triangle of art,
craft and nostalgic pastness that commerce around the violin family perpetrated.
That is not to deny that the instruments’ unique timbral qualities and heightened
potential to touch emotions were always likely to have been among the more
overt reasons why the violin family held such a strong attraction for learners. But
what is striking is that for a student of the violin (especially) to attain a technique
that could produce even a half-respectable sound took far more time and
toil than it did for a student of any other instrument, and many learners never
84 For a helpful overview of the history of the movement in Britain, see Alan
Crawford, ‘Arts and Crafts Movement’, Oxford Art Online (www.oxfordartonline.
com) [accessed 24 January 2015]. The connection between the Arts and Crafts
movement in Britain and the growth of violin-making in the Victorian period is
mentioned, but not developed, in Harvey, The Violin Family, pp. 250 and 255. It
will be a focus in Wilder’s Ph.D. dissertation; see n. 17 above.
85 See Linda Parry, ‘Arts and Crafts Textiles’, International Arts and Crafts, ed. Karen
Livingstone and Linda Parry (London: V[ictoria] & A[lbert Museum], 2005),
pp. 62–81, at p. 69; also Graeme Shankland, ‘William Morris – Designer’, William
Morris: Selected Writings and Designs, ed. Asa Briggs (Baltimore: Penguin, 1962),
unnumbered insert, following p. 160. It was not machinery per se that Morris
objected to, but the uses it was put to in the capitalist system: ‘[W]e should be
masters of our machines and not their slaves.’
86 See Alan Crawford, ‘The Importance of the City’, International Arts and Crafts,
pp. 218–37, at p. 218; see also Harvey, The Violin Family, pp. 401–6, for lists of
British makers and the locations in which they worked.
came anywhere near achieving these goals. That challenge makes it all the more
astonishing that so many people persevered with string instruments, aiming for
the visceral and sensual thrill of creating sound through wood – a sound made
with an aesthetically pleasing, handmade object. That they did so, and in such
numbers, was due in no small part to changes in social attitudes and economic
structures in late Victorian Britain that opened up the violin market and its
associated commerce. However, the phenomenon seems also indicative of both
a world that – perhaps fearful of its future – was questioning the legacy of
‘progress’ through industrial manufacturing, and a society that was increasingly
imagining a lost artisanal past (ideas that are viewed by many scholars as
indicative of Englishness).87 In the sphere of music, these values were reflected
in, and may even have been propelled by, how British culture and commerce
chose to construct and promote the idea of the violin. That idea, moreover, may
help explain something of the intensity of the craze for playing instruments
of the violin family in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It may
also account for the rapid social and demographic expansion of violin culture to
extend, as one magazine trumpeted in 1884, from ‘the most exalted in the land to
the humblest dweller in the cottage’. 88
87 On the idealization of the past and the pastoral, see Jan Marsh, Back to the Land:
The Pastoral Impulse in England, from 1880 to 1914 (London: Quartet Books, 1982),
and Martin J. Wiener, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit,
1850–1980 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
88 Editorial, The Fiddler, April 1884, p. [1].
Repertoires
202
1 For more details, see Claude V. Palisca, Music and Ideas in the Sixteenth and
Seventeenth Centuries (Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2006),
pp. 6–7.
2 See Robert C. Ketterer, ‘Why Early Opera is Roman and Not Greek’, Cambridge
Opera Journal 15 (2003), 1–14.
3 Quoted from Jason Geary, ‘Reinventing the Past: Mendelssohn’s Antigone and the
Creation of an Ancient Greek Musical Language’, Journal of Musicology 23 (2006),
187–226, at p. 191.
4 Eduard Devrient, My Recollections of Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy and His Letters
to Me, trans. Natalia MacFarren (London: Richard Bentley, 1869), p. 8; German in
Meine Erinnerungen an Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy und seine Briefe an mich, 2nd
edn (Leipzig: J. J. Weber, 1872), p. 14.
5 Devrient, My Recollections, pp. 224–6; Meine Erinnerungen, pp. 218–19.
6 R. Larry Todd, Mendelssohn: A Life in Music (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2003), pp. 418–25.
7 Douglass Seaton, ‘Mendelssohn’s Dramatic Music’, The Mendelssohn Companion,
ed. Douglass Seaton (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001), pp. 192–204; Jason
Geary, The Politics of Appropriation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014),
pp. 53–63.
Greek tragic poetry while still conveying to his audience intervals and melodic
contours they could easily recognize.
This Prussian production was singularly influential for re-establishing
ancient Greek tragedy in the modern theatrical repertoire.8 Even before the
Potsdam production of Sophocles’s Oedipus at Colonus in 1845, the Antigone
production had been exported to the Paris Odéon and then was reproduced at
London’s Covent Garden.9 Mendelssohn’s music was roundly criticized in the
Times for being ‘too modern and at the same time not modern enough’, adding
for comparison that Berlin, a university town, had ‘a particularly learned
public’. 10 The anonymous review also noted that the audience actually hissed
at the singing of the chorus, although this was in part due to poor execution of
the music.11 Even so, it concluded that the audience was left with the impression
‘that they had witnessed a great work, new to them from its extreme simplicity,
and striking by its deep solemnity’. Looking at this review in retrospect, we
observe several themes that will persist for decades: the novelty of experiencing
recreations of ancient Greek music; the association between ancient Greek
music and drama; and the persistent rebalancing between authenticity and
modernity.
Even in the American Midwest, and even as late as 1879, newspapers were
circulating the statement that Mendelssohn’s attempt at adapting the Antigone
choruses to his conception of Greek music ‘proved to be a harsh jargon’.12 On
the other hand, later that same year, Midwestern newspapers circulated a
syndicated report about an article published by Charles Lévêque in the January
Journal des savants.13 It described Louis Albert Bourgault-Ducoudray’s extensive
‘ethnomusicological’ survey of contemporary Greek ecclesiastical and folk music.
He reportedly had reconstructed ‘melodies which he attributed to the epochs of
Socrates and Phidias’. The syndicated American article concludes by reporting
Lévêque’s suggestion that modern music would be much enhanced by borrowing
from the ancient Greeks the simplicity of their melodies, the diversity of their
rhythms and the multiplicity of their modes, along with a more liberal use of the
chromatic mode. (Following this, not much of note was happening in Europe with
regard to Greek music until the 1870s.)
Ancient Greek music found a permanent home in American academia in
1875. When the Harvard Advocate proposed that the following year’s inaugural
production at the Sanders Theatre in Memorial Hall should ‘attempt to reproduce
as exactly as possible the “Antigone” of Sophocles, as it was represented at
Athens’, a Boston Globe article immediately targeted the issue of Mendelssohn’s
music: ‘The Greek music, which is not to be had, [the Advocate] thinks may be
happily substituted by the music of Mendelssohn, written for these choruses.’14
Although the Advocate pointed out that the Potsdam production was criticized
by all the leading European newspapers, the paper nonetheless suggested that,
despite the potential criticism, a Harvard production would attract the attention
of scholars from all over the country and be ‘a great honor to the College’. That
same year, Harvard professor John Knowles Paine, the pioneering American
symphonist and choral composer, was including the study of ancient Greek
music in his History of Music class.15 His exam of February 1875 asked broad
historical questions about the periods, musicians and ‘general character’ of Greek
music and technical questions about ‘the different kinds of tetrachords and their
combinations and the diatonic modes’. 16 He also asked the students to describe
‘the ancient styles of singing’, which included the ‘musical recitative’ of dramatic
dialogue and choral ‘intonation’ of Greek tragedy and more generally ‘sonorous
declamation’. 17
The Harvard production of Paine’s Oedipus Tyrannus in May 1881 marks the
first of many American college productions of Greek tragedies in the original
language and with incidental music.18 Like Mendelssohn, Paine, according
to Washington’s National Republican, ‘abandoned at the outset all notions of
attempting to reproduce, or to imitate Greek music because no one has anything
but theories as to what that music was, and there is a doubt if they had any music
at all, as we moderns understand it’. 19 According to the Burlington Free Press,
the music he composed in contemporary idiom for a male chorus of fifteen, a
supplementary chorus of fifty and full orchestra of thirty-two was worthy of high
praise but the delivery too powerful for the concept: ‘That any music ever heard
in Athens was as rich, full, and expressive as that composed by Mr. Paine for the
choruses of the Oedipus, is quite improbable.’ 20 A report in the [New York] Sun
14 Boston Globe (citing the Advocate), 6 November 1875, p. 8. The article refers also to
a performance in modern Athens in honour of the wedding of King George I and
Olga Constantinova [in 1867].
15 Harvard University Catalogue, 1875–76 (Cambridge, MA: Charles W. Sever, 1875),
p. 259.
16 Ibid., p. 260.
17 New York World, 4 December 1878, p. 6.
18 Wisconsin State Journal (Madison), 24 May 1881, p. 4.
19 National Republican (Washington, DC), 13 May 1881, p. 1.
20 Burlington Free Press (Vermont), 27 May 1881, p. 2; cf. Cincinnati Daily Gazette, 18
May 1881, p. 2.
praised Paine’s ability in avoiding the ‘severity and barrenness’ of ancient Greek
music.21 Later, the Prelude to Oedipus was excerpted for the Boston Symphony
Orchestra in 1894 (just after the ‘Hymn to Apollo’ had been discovered), Paine’s
score was published and reissued several times, and the play was revived by
Boston’s Apollo Club in 1895, but the work never became part of the standard
repertoire.22
The music for the American Academy of Dramatic Arts revival of Sophocles’s
Electra in New York in 1889 was composed by Laura Sedgwick Collins, an 1886
graduate of the Academy.23 Although she introduced modern harmonies, the
New York Tribune said she made ‘a commendable effort to adhere to what little
is known of the form of ancient Greek music’.24 This was just one of a number
of subsequent amateur and commercial American productions of Greek tragedies
that have been identified and studied in several recent books. None of the earliest
productions, most notably Paine’s Oedipus, Collins’s Electra, and B. C. Blodgett’s
Electra at Smith in 1889 (and Amherst in 1895), incorporated the harmonic
signatures of ancient Greek music.25
The discovery in 1893 of a poem with musical notation inscribed on marble
blocks from the Athenian Treasury at Delphi was the watershed event that would
replace the general assumption that nothing was known about ancient Greek
music with frequent live realizations and attempts at integrating it into academic,
public and commercial presentations.26 Notices about the discovery of the ‘Hymn
to Apollo’ began to appear in American newspapers in November 1893. Henry
Edward Krehbiel, music editor of the New York Tribune, was already anticipating
the importance of the discovery:
Music has hitherto been regarded as one of the lost arts of Greece. While
there are plenty of records as to the part it played in the history of that
nation, nothing was known of its character. The new-found Hymn of Apollo
may therefore be regarded as a key wherewith to unlock a closed page in
the history of ancient Greece.27
Some American papers carried a piece from the Standard of London,
surmising that the ‘key’ required further collaborative study by both classicists
and music scholars:
It has been suggested that this may prove a key to the music of ancient
Greece, but it would be premature at present to encourage the enthusiasm
of scholars in this direction. […] The best of Grecians will practically be
out of court if he have not a musical scholar’s knowledge of the musical
art; while, on the other hand, the musician who has no Greek will be at a
disadvantage in arguing on the work of reconstruction. Collaboration will
doubtless succeed in the end, but the end will not be near.28
A few other examples of ancient Greek music had already been preserved
or discovered, like the Renaissance manuscript copies of several Mesomedes
hymns, the Seikilos inscription unearthed in 1883 and a papyrus fragment from
Euripides’s Orestes, published in 1890.29 Almost immediately after the publication
of the ‘Hymn to Apollo’, these, too, began to be mentioned in newspaper
accounts. Among the miscellany on its music page, Chicago’s Inter Ocean
reprinted a report from the New York Musical Courier in listing Mesomedes’s
‘Hymn to Calliope’ and the Orestes papyrus as parallels for the new Delphic
hymn.30 Some of these entries were fairly detailed. The New Orleans Times-
Picayune, for instance, not only mentioned the Euripidean fragment but even
pointed out that Otto Crusius had published it in the erudite European scholarly
journal Philologus.31 The New York World quoted a scholarly analysis of Saint-
Saëns’s attempt at authenticity in his 1894 score for Antigone:
[His] orchestra plays for the most part in unison with the voices, but at
times it is divided, and then one portion executes a counterpoint to the
melody. In a short preface, M. Saint-Saëns justifies this proceeding on the
authority of M. [François Auguste] Gevaert; but it is obvious that he has
27 New York Tribune, 18 November 1893, p. 5; cf. Charleston News and Courier (South
Carolina), 1 February 1894, p. 4.
28 For example, Themis (Sacramento, California), 24 February 1894, p. 5; and
Charleston News and Courier (South Carolina), 1 February 1894, p. 4.
29 Pöhlmann and West, Documents, pp. 92–115 [documents #24–28], 88–91 [#23] and
12–17 [#3].
30 Inter Ocean, 10 December 1893, p. 31.
31 Times-Picayune (New Orleans), 30 December 1893, p. 2. Cf. Otto Crusius, ‘Zu
neuentdeckten antiken Musikresten’, Philologus 52 (1893), 160–200. See also
Crusius, ‘Die delphischen Hymnen: Untersuchungen über Texte und Melodien’,
Philologus 53, Ergänzungsheft (1894), 1–146.
gone far beyond the ‘rudimentary polyphony’ which the learned Belgian
theorist had in view when writing of Greek attempts in this direction.32
In Baltimore, the Sun delved into the scalar and rhythmic features of the piece:
‘The composition is in the Hypo-Dorian mode and, like most ancient musical
compositions, in a minor key. It is in a peculiar time, with five crotchets to the
bar.’ 33 In the same week, Krehbiel, who would now become a leading proponent
for the acceptance of ancient Greek music, published a lengthy feature on ancient
music in the New York Tribune in which he detailed the story of the Delphi
discovery, narrated a brief history of Greek music, mentioned Pindar’s First
Pythian Ode fragment [‘discovered’ by Athanasius Kircher in the seventeenth
century but later deemed spurious], and included both a facsimile and a modern
transcription of Mesomedes’s second-century ‘Hymn to Nemesis’ as well as a
table of Alypian notations.34
In late March 1894, the New York Herald carried the report of a performance
at the French Archaeological School in Athens for members of the Greek royal
family, diplomats and scholars.35 Within a month, a syndicated report added
that the performance was introduced by Théophile Homolle, the director of the
Delphi excavations, arranged by the young Greek composer Nicholas and sung by
four Greek amateurs.36 By the next month, Théodore Reinach, the editor of Revue
des études grecques, had edited the fragments, published a transcription and
prepared a performance version of the ‘Hymne à Apollon’ with accompaniment
by Gabriel Fauré.37 Reinach oversaw academic presentations in Paris, Brussels
and elsewhere, most of which were reported in American newspapers.38
It was Reinach who arranged for the first commercial publication of the hymn
in the Almanach Hachette,39 while C. F. Abdy Williams of Bradfield College
almost immediately assumed the same role in England and provided an English
translation. This version of the ‘Hymn to Apollo’ was circulated in June 1894
as an ‘Extra Supplement’ to the Musical Times,40 and a round of newspaper
32 For example, New York World, 25 February 1894, p. 1; cf. also San Francisco Call,
8 March 1894, p. 6. For Saint-Saëns’s Antigone, see Solomon, ‘The Reception of
Ancient Greek Music’, pp. 503–4.
33 Sun (Baltimore), 11 April 1894, p. 4. In 1893, Tchaikovsky had composed the second
movement of his final symphony in 5/4.
34 New York Tribune, 8 April 1894, p. 22. Cf. New York Tribune, 16 April 1894, p. 4.
35 New York Herald, 30 March 1894, p. 11.
36 Springfield Republican (Massachusetts), 21 April 1894, p. 8.
37 Théodore Reinach, ‘La musique des hymnes de Delphes’, Bulletin de
correspondance hellénique 17 (1893), 584–610, and 18 (1894), 363–89. Cf. Reinach,
‘Une page de musique grecque’, La revue de Paris 1, June 1894, p. 207.
38 For example, Boston Herald, 29 April 1894, p. 16; San Francisco Call, 24 June 1894,
p. 16; Worcester Daily Spy (Masschusetts), 13 January 1895, p. 5.
39 ‘L’Hymne à Apollon: Le plus ancien specimen de musique du monde’, Almanach
Hachette 1 (1895), 302.
40 Musical Times and Singing Class Circular, 1 June 1894, suppl., pp. 1–8.
announcements and features blanketed the island.41 Within two weeks the Times
reported that the piece had been sung at the Cambridge Musical Club and was
being played nightly at the well-established Willis’ Rooms Restaurant in London
(formerly part of Almack’s Assembly Rooms, a social club) as a violin solo, with
rests to signify the lacunae in the inscription.42 The same month at Queen’s
Hall, Abdy Williams and W. H. Wing gave a lecture performance that featured
five fragments of ancient Greek music.43 And for popular consumption in both
London and New York, Abdy Williams published the lyrics and music of the
Pindaric fragment, Mesomedes’s hymns to Calliope, the Sun and Nemesis, the
Seikilos inscription and the Delphic Hymn in book form.44 The publication was
advertised in American newspapers well into the autumn.45 When Swinburne
penned a new translation of the hymn, it appeared in the August 1894 issue of the
British magazine Nineteenth Century and in the Boston Herald.46
July 1894 brought a transcription of the Delphic hymn that circulated in
major American newspapers.47 The next month, Krehbiel’s two-column review of
Abdy Williams’s book argued that the medieval exclusivity of the Greek diatonic
system had made modern listeners incapable of hearing, let alone singing,
quarter-tones.48 In fact, the microtones of the ancient Greek enharmonic genus
would only rarely penetrate American popular culture. Greater interest would
be generated by presenting ancient Greek music not as odd-sounding intervals
and irregular scalar systems but as discrete scalar segments of Aristoxenus’s
diatonic system. This would ultimately allow it to escape academic discussions
and satisfy paying audiences.49 But despite the intellectual and historical interest
in recovering fragments of ancient Greek music, there remained as well an
enculturated dislike for the single vocal line of ancient Greek monody and its
41 For example, Worcester Journal, 30 June 1894, p. 6; Western Times (Devon), 26 June
1894, p. 6; and Glasgow Herald, 26 June 1894, pp. 7–8.
42 Times (London), 12 June 1894, p. 4F.
43 Observer, 24 June 1894, p. 6; MP, 25 June 1894, p. 6. For Wing, cf. Cambridge
Review, 23 November 1881, p. 91.
44 The Music of the Ancient Greeks (London: Novello, Ewer, 1894). Cf. Théodore
Reinach, Hymne à Apollon (London: Novello, Ewer, 1894).
45 For example, Springfield Republican (Massachusetts), 14 October 1894, p. 11.
46 Nineteenth Century 210, August 1894, pp. 315–16; Boston Herald, 12 August 1894,
p. 25. Cf. Observer, 19 August 1894, p. 1; and Charles Algernon Swinburne, The
Poems of Algernon Charles Swinburne, 6 vols (London: Chatto & Windus, 1904),
vol. 6, pp. 372–3.
47 For example, Cincinnati Enquirer, 29 July 1894, p. 12; New York Herald, 29 July 1894,
p. 13; and Philadelphia Inquirer, 12 August 1894, p. 22. Cf. Boston Herald, 11 July
1894, p. 7.
48 New York Tribune, 26 August 1894, p. 20.
49 The Guardian, 13 January 1895, p. 6, mentions ‘a most interesting experiment’, a
lecture/performance by Abdy Williams and Wing at the Royal Academy of Music
(London) that would ‘centre on the effect produced on modern ears by the Greek
tuning’. Broadwood and Sons tuned several pianos ‘in accordance with the scales
as described by Aristoxenus’.
lack of instrumental diversity, particularly in the late romantic era of the mid
1890s. Even Reinach embellished the hymn with Fauré’s harmonized instrumental
accompaniment.
Typical of the 1890s were the comments by the anonymous New York Times
reviewer of Saint-Saëns’s Antigone, who declared his adaptation of ancient Greek
idiom to be ‘tedious’ and ‘monotonous’.50 Similarly, the Boston Herald proposed:
‘It is hard to believe that the ancient Greeks, who brought the practice of the other
arts to so high a point of perfection, could have produced nothing better than the
dry and unimpressive jargon that has resulted from the efforts to decipher the few
remains of Hellenic music that have come down to us.’51 In 1895, the Boston Daily
Advertiser review of Paine’s score for Oedipus Tyrannus labelled it an ‘American
masterpiece’ and suggested: ‘Prof. Paine would have found himself obliged, had
he followed the lead of the strict historian or antiquarian, to have written his
magnum opus either in unison passages or with a bagpipe drone accompaniment,
and either horn of the dilemma would have gored him severely.’ 52 The New
York Tribune reported that after giving a popular lecture on ancient music and
performing the Delphic hymn in a manner ‘particularly devoid of expression’,
Hannah Smith remarked that ancient Greek music was ‘very much below the
other arts of the Grecian people’. 53
Nonetheless, the ancient Greek hymn and modern electric (or gas-lamp)
technology generated at least one remarkable example of an American
Gesamtkuntswerk. On 29 March 1895, Reverend S. J. Barrows gave a public lecture
illustrated with stereopticon slides at Boston’s Winthrop Hall. The Boston Journal
and the Boston Globe both reported that Barrows displayed views of Greek
shrines and then showed ‘a picture of the stone containing the hymn’. The lights
in the hall were turned down, a view of Delphi and Parnassus was shown on the
screen and a dozen chorus members sang the hymn in unison to flute and piano
accompaniment. The Globe paid particular attention to the technical aspects of
the ‘weird’ melody: ‘The effect was deeply impressive. The Greeks did not object
to putting a joyful hymn of thanksgiving in a minor key. The five-eight rhythm
gave a peculiar effect when combined with the weird melody.’54
On the same day, reports appeared in the metropolitan Tribune and Inter
Ocean about the final evening of the Ann Arbor Classical Conference attended
by 350 delegates from nearly a dozen states.55 Benjamin D’Ooge, the long-
serving professor at Michigan State Normal School, described the discovery, and
then Gardner Lamson of the School of Music sang the hymn (‘for the first time
in this country’), with his colleague Albert A. Stanley playing the Henry Frieze
[‘Columbian’] Organ in Hill Auditorium. Here, too, the report in the Detroit Free
Press included some technical analysis:
Apollo, as well as the Pindar and Seikilos pieces.63 In New York, Frank Damrosch
prepared a public concert of not just the Delphic hymn but also the Euripidean
Orestes fragment, employing the modern accompaniment and supplements
recently published by Andreas Thierfelder in Germany.64
The Delphic hymn was often inserted into different types of Greek-related
productions, and women often played a significant role.65 In May 1896, Rockford
College in Illinois boasted of being the first western American women’s college
to produce a Greek tragedy, for which Miss Caroline Radecke sang the ‘Hymn
to Apollo’ as a prelude.66 The hymn served as the opening number in Mabel Hay
Barrows’s 1897 play, The Return of Odysseus, performed at Radcliffe and Brown
for the benefit of their Women’s Colleges and then for more general audiences at
Chicago’s Hull House and Fine Arts Building.67 And six young women from Miss
[Clara] Baur’s Conservatory of Music in Cincinnati sang the ‘Hymn to Apollo’
at an open meeting of the Greek Circle of the local Woman’s Club in 1906.68
Krehbiel left us a careful delineation of Frank Taft’s arrangement sung by New
York’s Madrigal Singers sponsored by the piano firm Chickering & Sons in the
winter of 1899:
Mr. Taft’s setting of the Greek hymn, which is far and away the most
interesting specimen of ancient music which the world possesses,
proved to be extremely effective. He gave it a tripartite form by setting a
portion of the second part for baritone solo, with a sparing use of harp
chords, and then repeating the first part (which had been sung without
accompaniment) with harp arpeggios added. Dr. Dufft sang the solo
and won admiration for the justness of his intonation in spite of its many
strange and awkward intervals.69
Ancient Greek music, and especially the Delphic hymn, often provided what
we might today identify as ‘info-tainment’. In 1900, for instance, the Detroit
Archaeological Society sponsored ‘An Evening With Greek Music’ at the Museum
of Art.70 For this reason, background material on the hymn remained a sine qua
63 Ann Arbor News (Michigan), 30 March 1911, p. 10. Cf. Albert A. Stanley, Greek
Themes in Modern Musical Settings (New York: Macmillan, 1924), pp. 217–25.
64 New York Tribune, 30 October 1898, p. B8; Andreas Thierfelder, ed., Altgriechische
Musik (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1896–99); Record-Union (Sacramento,
California), 25 June 1899, p. 9. Cf. Yakima Herald (Washington state), 25 October
1905, p. 11; Boston Herald, 22 April 1906, p. 30.
65 For women and the revival of Greek tragedy, see Foley, Reimagining Greek Tragedy,
pp. 35–44.
66 Daily Register Gazette (Rockford, Illinois), 9 May 1896, p. 6.
67 New York Tribune, 6 December 1897, p. 9; Chicago Tribune, 9 December 1899, p. 5,
and 17 May 1900, p. 2.
68 Cincinnati Enquirer, 18 March 1906, p. 88.
69 New York Tribune, 1 February 1899, p. 6; Springfield Republican (Massachusetts),
12 February 1899, p. 15.
70 Detroit Free Press, 10 March 1900, p. 12.
non in announcements and reviews. One third of the local newspaper review
of the Rockford College Medea focused on the ‘Hymn to Apollo’, its discovery
at Delphi, its Hellenistic date, its 5/4 rhythm, its alphabetic notation and its
triumphant theme expressed in Apollo’s victory over the Python. Almost the
entire announcement for Colorado College’s performance of The Return of
Odysseus addressed the background of the ‘Delphic Hymn to Apollo’. 71 Beginning
in 1908, a feature on the history of the popular Christmas carol ‘Adeste Fideles’
entered multi-year syndication in small-town newspapers, and everywhere
it cited the antiquity of the ‘Hymn to Apollo’ as evidence that the words and
music of ‘the oldest Christian hymn known to the world’ could also be of ancient
origin.72 Newspaper copy was perpetuated. For a 1909 lecture/recital, the Duluth
News-Tribune said the hymn was ‘recently discovered by the French archeological
society’. 73 But the fascination resurfaced periodically. In 1912, several papers ran a
syndicated, illustrated, two-page, Sunday magazine feature, ‘A Magic Song 3000
Years Old’, that included the history, text and modern transcription of the hymn
along with the original Greek notation.74
It is probably no coincidence that the master for the earliest recording of the
‘Hymn to Apollo’ was made, on 30 October 1912, just weeks after this Sunday
magazine feature. The artists were contralto Elsie Baker and harpist Emma Rous,
and the recording was issued on a 12" disc [Victor #35279].75 The following year,
the Educational Department of the Victor Talking Machine Company published
a companion Music History and Appreciation home-study course. Lesson II, ‘The
Music of the Greeks’, made reference to a detailed historical description of the
hymn as well as the Abdy Williams translation.76 The home course was still in use
a decade later, demonstrating clearly that the hymn had successfully transitioned
into the world of educational commerce.77
Even though the music from Mendelssohn’s Antigone was now being used
for American theatrical revivals and movie-theatre musical accompaniment, the
proliferation of lectures and performances of authentic ancient Greek music
was, by the 1910s, inspiring a number of composers to develop more appropriate
78 For example, Rockford Morning Star (Illinois), 16 January 1914, p. 12, for the Festival
of Apollo; and Aberdeen Herald (South Dakota), 8 July 1912, p. 3, for a programme
that included Giuseppe de Liguoro’s Homer’s Odyssey.
79 San Francisco Chronicle, 2 October 1904, p. 4.
80 New York Tribune, 11 March 1906, p. 2; Sun (New York), 3 June 1906, p. 7; Rock
Island Argus (Illinois), 16 June 1906, p. 9.
81 San Francisco Call, 30 October 1910, p. 41.
82 Cf. San Francisco Chronicle, 12 June 1910, p. 74.
83 University Missourian (Columbia, Missouri), 25 November 1913, p. 1; Tacoma
Times (Washington state), 23 July 1913, p. 4. Cf. Herald and News (Newberry, South
Carolina), 8 May 1914, p. 8. Cf. Choate, Electra USA, pp. 152–6.
84 New York Tribune, 18 December 1915, p. 13; Sun (New York), 18 December 1915, p. 7.
drama seemed to call for their suggestion of local color. […] Thus for the
[…] sacrifice of Iphigenia […] he has used the Hyperlydian mode.85
Others developed their own strategies for recreating a functional ancient
Greek musical idiom. David Stanley Smith, who ultimately replaced Horatio
Parker at Yale, reportedly derived his melodies for Harley Granville Barker’s
1915 productions of Iphigenia in Tauris and The Trojan Women from the ancient
fragments, but he nonetheless used medieval modes and scored a number of
passages for violins.86 For the 1912 Smith College production of Euripides’s
Iphigenia at Aulis, all three types of choruses scored by Jane Peers [Newhall]
followed the rhythm of the Greek text and ranged only a single octave, E–e.
However, although one type used the Lydian ‘mode’, the others used E major and
minor.87
More ‘authentic’ was the music University of Michigan Professor Albert A.
Stanley composed for Alcestis and then Iphigenia in Tauris.88 In 1917, the Classical
Weekly described the result as an aesthetic triumph:
In the Iphigenia in Tauris the Greek rhythms were closely followed, as
they were in Mendelssohn’s music, but here for the first time the Dorian,
Phrygian and Aeolian modes were freely employed by a master hand and
modern harmonies were avoided. The music was rendered by a small
choir of skilled singers behind the scenes, to the accompaniment of two
flutes, two clarinets, a harp and a small piano, sufficiently suggestive of
ancient instruments, and, as it interpreted the varied feelings of chorus
and spectators alike, its charming rhythmical surprises, its curious
felicity and simple dignity, and above all its prevailing religious tone, now
reminiscent of the Delphic Hymn to Apollo, now suggestive of a Church
chorale, provided a new and vivid emotional experience. It proved, what
many have always believed, that Greek music, like the other Greek arts,
must have always been a thing of beauty, even judged by modern standards,
and that the choral parts must always have been the chief feature of Greek
tragedy.89
Representing renewed interest in the book trade, Macmillan, in 1924,
published Stanley’s Greek Themes in Modern Musical Settings, which included his
incidental music to Percy MacKaye’s 1907 drama, Sappho and Phaon. That same
year Jane Peers Newhall published her two settings of Euripides.90
Purely commercial applications celebrated both the exotic and the inherently
dignified aspects of ancient Greek music. Representing the former was Edgar
Stillman Kelley’s incidental music for Ben-Hur. In 1899, Kelley, who was then
at New York University (and in 1901 temporarily replaced Parker at Yale), was
called upon to compose the incidental music for Klaw & Erlanger’s theatrical
adaptation of Lew Wallace’s novel, Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ.91 Recognized
as an authority on ‘Oriental Music’, Kelley incorporated Dorian and Phrygian
scales, ancient Greek tetrachordal ranges and a simulated aulos into the scenes
set in the grove of Daphne, which, like Delphi, is a Hellenic sanctuary of Apollo.92
Newspapers from coast to coast repeatedly explained this to the masses.93 Of all
the ancient-style productions mentioned in this chapter, this was by far the most
commercially successful, playing nationwide from 1899 until 1920, earning at least
$10 million and witnessed by some 12 million spectators.94
Representing these ancient-style productions were the applications of ancient
Greek music to several types of dance performances. In 1904, the Omaha
Daily Bee printed a cablegram reporting from Berlin that Isadora Duncan had
developed sixty ancient Greek poses and dance movements, accompanied by
eight youths ‘playing and singing ancient Greek music specially composed’. 95
Eleven years later in New York, Duncan opened her brother Augustus’s version
of Oedipus with a rendition of the Delphic hymn, and she employed Edward Falk
to direct choruses ‘from several old Greek odes, with one excerpt from Gluck’. 96
Her other brother, Raymond, who was married to a Greek (Penelope Sikelianos)
and opened Platonic-like Academies in Athens, London and Paris, returned
to the United States and in 1910, bedecked in his customary ancient Greek
chlamys (cloak), tunic and sandals, advocated the curative properties of ancient
Greek music.97 He showed diagrams of ancient Greek musical systems and had
Penelope sing various microtones to demonstrate their actuality. In 1914, Diana
Watts published The Renaissance of the Greek Ideal, a book designed to instil
physical wellbeing through balance and movement by recreating the positions of
ancient Greek statuary.98 On 21 April 1914 at New York’s Booth Theatre, dressed
in a silk Grecian tunic and sandals, she illustrated her lecture, ‘The Movement of
Greek Statues’, by doing a gymnastic dance to the music of the ‘Hymn to Apollo’
accompanied by harp, flute and cello.99
Similarly, ancient Greek music was also claimed by an alternative but
popular esoteric group that promised a better understanding of one’s soul and
the universe. Theosophist Katherine Tingley incorporated a rendition of the
‘Hymn to Apollo’ along with ‘music in the old Greek modes’ into The Aroma of
Athens, a play set in Periclean Athens. It was performed before a full house on
New Year’s night 1918.100 In 1922, similar music was used for the performance of
Aeschylus’s Eumenides at Point Loma, California, and this popular production
was revived in 1923, twice in 1924, and again in 1925 and 1927.101 The commercial
viability of the production was further enhanced by advertising tickets under the
newspaper headline, ‘Seats Selling Rapidly For Greek Play’. A San Diego Union
announcement described the ‘Special Music’ promised in the headline: ‘Music
will be a special feature. […] It is based on the old Greek modes. In addition,
the ancient “Hymn to Apollo” from an authentic piece of Greek music dating
from the fourth century, and found at Delphi, where the opening scene of “The
Eumenides” is laid, will be sung.’
Some newspaper announcements were in essence advertisements, and some
were quite specific about ticket sales and/or beneficiaries. In 1908, tickets for
‘old and modern Greek music’, performed on the White House lawn ‘through
the courtesy of Mrs. Roosevelt […] for the Washington Playground Association’,
were said to be on sale at a nearby store.102 The ‘Hymn to Apollo’ performed at
the Daphnephoria festival in Washington, DC, in the spring of 1910 was for the
benefit of the Neighborhood House.103 As part of the pre-Olympic festivities in
Los Angeles in 1932, tenor Tom Nassos sang the ‘Hymn to Apollo’ for the benefit
of the State Home Building Fund of the American War Mothers, and ticket sales
were handled by the Veterans’ Prosperity Organization.104 Some performances
were funded through both civic sponsorship and ticket sales. Washington’s
‘Children’s Concerts for Adults’ in 1938, for instance, were jointly sponsored
98 Diana Watts, The Renaissance of the Greek Ideal (New York: Frederick A. Stokes,
1914).
99 New York Times, 19 April 1914, p. X5, and 22 April 1914, p. 15; New York Tribune,
22 April 1914, p. 9. Cf. Washington Post, 16 March 1914, p. 5, and 2 May 1914, p. 4;
Perrysburg Journal (Ohio), 13 August 1914, p. 3; and Musical America 19, 25 April
1914, p. 27. Admission was charged for the lecture.
100 Evening Tribune (San Diego), 27 December 1917, p. 3; San Diego Union, 3 January
1918, p. 2.
101 San Diego Union, 3 September 1922, p. 30, and 3 June 1923, p. 10; Evening Tribune
(San Diego), 14 March 1924, p. 2, and 2 June 1924, p. 8; San Diego Union, 5 May
1925, p. 13; Evening Tribune (San Diego), 10 September 1927, p. 14.
102 Washington Times, 4 October 1908, p. 34, and 10 October 1908, p. 4; National
Tribune, 15 October 1908, p. 5.
103 Washington Post, 24 May 1910, p. 3.
104 Los Angeles Times, 11 July 1932, p. A9, and 18 July 1932, p. A6.
by the music committee of the Junior Board of Commerce and the Community
Center Department, while ticket sales were under the supervision of the National
Symphony box office.105 The first of these programmes, ‘Poetry in Music’, used
the ‘Hymn to Apollo’ as ‘illustrative material’.
The 1920s and 1930s would bring recorded music and radio to millions of
new consumers. As an attraction ancient Greek music hardly rivalled John
Philip Sousa, Enrico Caruso or Bing Crosby, but now more people could hear a
sampling of recreated ancient Greek music than at any point in history. Victor
produced two new recordings of the ‘Hymn to Apollo’.106 The first [BE-35851] was
recorded on 3 September 1926, by the Victor Mixed Chorus of two sopranos, a
tenor, a baritone and two basses under the direction of Clifford Cairns. They were
accompanied by a single flute and harp. A second master [#20896] was recorded
on 11 July 1927, by the Palestrina Choir under the direction of Nicola A. Montani.
According to the Victor ledgers, this choir consisted of fourteen sopranos, eleven
altos, ten tenors and eleven basses, accompanied by flute. The latter recording
was released in December as a 10" disc [BVE-39520] and was said to be ‘of special
interest’ by Phonograph Monthly Review.107 Although the former appears not to
have been issued, the latter was recommended in English Journal in 1932 and
was still being recommended for its educational value in Scribner’s Magazine in
1936.108 In 1931, Parlophone issued an educational recording of the Seikilos piece
and Mesomedes’s ‘Hymn to the Sun’ as part of Curt Sachs’s historical anthology,
‘Two Thousand Years of Music’. 109
It was also in this period that Greek music was played on the radio, reaching
an even larger potential audience. Across the Atlantic, Dublin heard a programme
of the ‘Hymn to Apollo’, Beethoven’s Ruins of Athens and other Greek-themed
works.110 The BBC advertised its broadcast of the hymn as a ‘new discovery’
because they had recently found a neglected copy of the inscription in the British
Museum.111 In the United States in 1926, arrangements were made for Boston’s
WBZ radio to broadcast the College of the Holy Cross’s highly publicized
production of Euripides’s Hecuba ‘to bring home to thousands the beauty of the
melodies’ (Fig. 9.1).112 An English version preceded a Greek – so the audience
Figure 9.1
Display advertisement for the
performance of Euripides’s
Hecuba, placed by the
College of the Holy Cross
in the Boston Globe, 14 May
1926, p. 19 [Courtesy of the
College of the Holy Cross]
would better comprehend the latter – and WBZ agreed to broadcast both. The
music was arranged by Professor of Music John B. Marshall of the College of
the Holy Cross and Boston University, and it was ‘based on the notation found
inscribed on the ancient “Ode to Apollo”’. In an interview with the Boston Herald,
Marshall said: ‘I have undertaken to rearrange the melody of the hymn and fit it
to the metre of Euripides’ tragedy. We will attempt to arrange unison melodies
to the various sung choruses in Hecuba.’ 113 This production (on 30 May 1926)
sold so many advance tickets that the venue was moved from Boston College’s
Fenwick Hall all the way to Worcester’s Fitton Field stadium, nearly 50 miles
away. Using an array of modern technologies, sound was amplified in the stadium
under the guidance of the New England Telephone & Telegraph Company so that
as many as 5,000 spectators could hear clearly.114 These included President and
Mrs. Calvin Coolidge, William Cardinal O’Connell of the Boston archdiocese
and Charalambos Simopoulos, the Greek Minister to the United States.115 I
have not yet found evidence that the performance was indeed broadcast, but
an announcement in a 1932 issue of Wireless World says that ‘the oldest piece of
music ever transmitted by wireless’ would be broadcast in May of that year.116
Meanwhile, in January 1930, Damrosch’s ‘Iphigenia’s Farewell’ (presumably from
his Iphigenie in Aulis mentioned above) was broadcast coast to coast from WGY
in Schenectady.117 Lastly here, Damrosch wrote the forward for Hazel Kinscella’s
Music on the Air, a book-length guide to radio listening that included a full-page
118 Hazel Gertrude Kinscella, Music on the Air (Garden City, NJ: Garden City
Publishing, 1934), pp. 38–42 and 246.
119 Rosario Scalero, Three Ancient Greek Songs: For a Singing Tower, 1932, signed
holograph, Special Collections, Curtis Institute of Music Library, Philadelphia, PA.
120 Boston Herald, 5 April 1936, p. 52; New York Herald Tribune, 17 February 1937, p. F6.
121 New York Herald Tribune, 28 September 1930, p. G2; cf. New York Times, 23 August
1931, p. X7.
122 Chicago Tribune, 9 September 1933, p. 4.
the Delphic hymn at its first concert. The announcement in the Chicago Tribune
on 28 August 1932 clearly laid out their commercial intent and provides an
appropriate conclusion to our survey: ‘The ancient Greek modes, Dorian,
Phrygian, Mixolydian […] are due to emerge from their confines in the text books
and become definite items in music-making when the Byzantine Sextet steps out
into its professional career this season.’ 123
Eighty years later, after the recovery of more than four dozen additional
fragments of ancient Greek music and the production of several more
comprehensive recordings, one must still claim that ancient Greek music is
less represented than most other genres of Greek art. But clearly the discovery
of the first Delphic hymn in 1893 enabled a more enlightened public to access a
respectable number of commercialized performances, adaptations, recordings
and broadcasts over the next four decades. In the 1890s, newspaper reports
rapidly turned scholarly discoveries and research in ancient Greek music
into items of public interest, and in the early days of American consumerism,
educational performances of such an unfamiliar type of music representing such a
highly respected culture gradually attracted a considerable amount of commercial
exploitation. Later, public demand for tickets became strong enough to move
the venue for a performance of Euripides’s Hecuba from a college auditorium
to a football stadium, where thousands of paying customers and even the
president of the United States looked on. The movement was powerful enough
to gradually lure ancient Greek music out of college and university venues into
recording studios and radio broadcasts. However, to make its way into and as a
result of the popularizing and commercialization processes, the music itself was
almost always adapted for modern taste. The monodic style, its inherent lack of
harmony and the limited palette of instrumental sounds, as well as the extremely
limited amount of extant ancient Greek music samples, led composers, for the
most part, to reject the simple recreation of ancient Greek music and substitute
compositions of their own, often incorporating only one or two features intended
to reflect an ancient Greek musical sound. Of course, similar refinements were
applied to other ancient Greek arts in Neoclassical sculpture and architecture, but
there the extant remains were not nearly so precious or underappreciated.
1 See Giuseppe Verdi: I masnadieri, ed. Roberta Montemorra Marvin, The Works
of Giuseppe Verdi (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Milan: Ricordi, 2000),
Historical Introduction; and Marvin, ‘The Censorship of I masnadieri in London’,
Verdi Newsletter 25 (1998), 20–3.
2 On La traviata in London, see Roberta Montemorra Marvin, ‘The Victorian
Violetta: The Social Messages of Verdi’s La traviata’, Art and Ideology in European
Opera, ed. Rachel Cowgill, Clive Brown and David Cooper (Woodbridge: Boydell,
2010), pp. 224–40; Susan Rutherford, ‘La traviata, or the “willing grisette”: Male
Critics and Female Performance in the 1850s’, Verdi 2001: Atti del Convegno
Internazionale, ed. Fabrizio Della Seta, Roberta Montemorra Marvin and
Marco Marica, 2 vols (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2003), vol. 2, pp. 585–600; and
Heather Wiebe, ‘Spectacles of Sin and Suffering: La traviata in Victorian London’,
Repercussions 9/2 (2001), 33–67.
3 ‘Cultural geography’ is a well-known and widely applied concept; here I use it in
reference to the study of cultural products and practices and how they relate to
venues and locations, with a focus on how cultural phenomena, specifically here
the arts, vary or not as they ‘travel’ across time, space, and even class. On the term
more generally, see Terry G. Jordan-Bychkov, Mona Domosh and Lester Rowntree,
223
were helped along by increased mobilities – of people and goods, of knowledge
and information – made possible by new technologies, which characterized the
nineteenth century, thereby helping to create the first great era of consumerism.4
These mobilities affected the dissemination, the understanding, the experiences
and the practices of music, as well as the very nature of ideas about music in
general and about opera in particular. The traditional, mainly aristocratic and
upper-class, audience for opera continued expanding in London throughout
the century as a result of these mobilities and, in large part, of continuing
renegotiations of class boundaries, the consequence of economic prosperity
and social ambition among the classes.5 With this broadened audience came
an extended market for operatic music beyond the theatre, and Verdi’s operas
produced commodities serving various constituencies outside the opera house in
varying ways.
Public concerts in various venues featured opera excerpts.6 Often these
were sung by star singers who were currently performing with one of London’s
two resident opera companies; the musical selections thus served dual duty
commercially, disseminating and popularizing an opera and also promoting
a company. Well-known selections from foreign operas also formed part of the
repertoire in London’s music halls, where they were programmed to lend an air of
respectability to the establishment and its entertainments.7 In addition, operatic
music was performed in instrumental arrangements for orchestras and military
bands, and it served as the basis for countless potpourris, fantasias, quadrilles,
paraphrases and similar genres published for piano (which could be performed in
public or in private). In addition, as part of the street music repertoire, opera even
reached London’s poor, thereby presenting a challenge to established class-based
definitions of music.8
Beyond these more or less usual means of disseminating Verdi’s music were
the transformations of operas both as domesticated (‘Englished’) sheet-music
publications and as comic stage adaptations. These ‘spinoff industries’ (the
first primarily of the 1840s and 1850s, the second lasting into the 1880s) served
multiple purposes.
London music publishers increasingly capitalized on opera’s appeal through
issuing arrangements, especially for voice with piano accompaniment, of
individual numbers from the most widely known works. In mid-century London
published excerpts were often issued with English verses only, many of which
were not translations of the original, but rather newly written and virtually always
tailored in their pure sentiments and noble meanings to Victorian sensibilities.
The ‘Englishing’ was a particularly widespread practice with regard to numbers
from several Verdi operas, especially La traviata, Il trovatore and Rigoletto.
Published with cleansed poetry conveying messages about healthy attitudes
or moral lifestyles, such sheet-music excerpts became commodities that, by
upholding Victorian decorum and pretences, facilitated acquisition of the cultural
object of opera, making it accessible, familiar and acceptable in both practical
and philosophical ways. Sheet music supplied a consumer product that educated
Victorian opera enthusiasts, offering the advantage of getting to know the music
in private spaces before attending the theatre, or the privilege of becoming better
acquainted with a favourite tune after having heard it in performance. For some
Victorians, the sheet music did not complement an opera-house experience but
rather proffered their only exposure to operatic works. Facilitating for new classes
of socially ambitious users participation in (or at least imitation of ) the more
genteel activities of society, these transformed and transplanted songs went a long
way toward ‘selling’ the idea of Italian opera – a genre largely defined in mid and
late century by Verdi’s operas – within the realm of mass culture in mid-Victorian
England.9
In addition, the more widely performed, popular and/or controversial
Verdian works – above all, Il trovatore and La traviata, but also Ernani and
Rigoletto – were transformed (multiple times) into burlesques (and, in some
instances, farces), which were staged in theatrical venues very different from the
opera house. Given the differing codes and expectations of various sectors of the
socially mixed-class audiences for these establishments, operatic burlesque seems
to have provided a means for bridging class boundaries and cultural differences
by translating an artificial high-art genre into an ‘earthy’ low-art form. Moreover,
the genre created common ground for audience members from all classes, who
would have shared certain sensitivities to contemporary political, economic or
social matters, which were evident in the burlesques’ real-life details and satirical
chamber, music, the popularity of French grand opera, the spread of new ideas,
e.g., Wagner’s theories, especially on ‘music of the future’ – and the consequent
diminishing of italianità; and he grumbled about, even took offence at, the
movements within Italian culture to overturn traditional artistic standards and
disdain traditional aesthetic values, manifested, for example, in the philosophy
and works of the macchiaioli in painting and the scapigliati in literature.19 But
eventually (in the 1870s) Verdi too began complaining about Italy’s ‘musical
fermentation’, 20 especially with regard to (his words) ‘stupid conventionalism’,
‘pedantry’, ‘false expression’ and the ‘severe, heavy, monotonous instrumentation’
of many Italian operas of past eras.21 Both Don Carlos and Aida reflect Verdi’s
growing concerns and could be considered (at least in part) artistic statements,
attempts to create exemplars for alleviating the situation.
O n 22 June 1876, Verdi’s Aida came to life in London for the first time, when
the theatre manager Frederick Gye produced it at his Royal Italian Opera.22
Aida’s world premiere on 24 December 1871 at the Opera House in Cairo and
its European premiere six weeks later (8 February 1872) at the Teatro alla Scala
in Milan had drawn a great deal of international attention. Not only was Verdi
the pre-eminent opera composer of the era, but Aida was the first new opera
he had composed since Don Carlos in 1867 and just his second new work in
ten years. Aida was also ‘a strange event in the musical world’:23 written on an
original Egyptian topic (rather than adapted from a European literary source),24
19 These trends and Verdi’s opinions on them are discussed in Roberta Montemorra
Marvin, Verdi the Student – Verdi the Teacher (Parma: Istituto Nazionale di Studi
Verdiani, 2010), chapter 3, esp. pp. 82–7, and chapter 4, esp. pp. 118–22.
20 Verdi’s letter to Opprandino Arrivabene, 16 July 1875, in Annibale Alberti, Verdi
intimo (Milan: Arnaldo Mondadori, 1931), p. 182.
21 Letter to Giuseppe Piroli, 30 May 1868, in Carteggi verdiani, ed. Alessandro Luzio,
4 vols (Rome: Reale Accademia d’Italia, 1935–47), vol. 3, pp. 53–4.
22 As manager of the Royal Italian Opera at Covent Garden (established in 1847) from
1848 to 1878, Gye (1810–78) played a significant role in London’s operatic culture.
The most detailed treatments of the opera business in nineteenth-century London
up to the 1870s are two King’s College London Ph.D. dissertations: Gabriella
Dideriksen, ‘Repertory and Rivalry: Opera at the Second Covent Garden Theatre,
1830–1856’ (1997); and Matthew L. Ringel, ‘Opera in “The Donizettian Dark Ages”:
Management, Competition and Artistic Policy in London, 1861–1870’ (1996). A
concise study of Gye’s role can be found in Dideriksen and Ringel, ‘Frederick
Gye and “The Dreadful Business of Opera Management”’, 19th-Century Music 19
(1995), 3–30. Throughout the present essay, references to the joint article normally
indicate that a topic is dealt with in greater detail in one or both dissertations;
references to the authors’ dissertations are given only when information is cited
directly from them. The latter part of the century is treated in Paul Rodmell, Opera
in the British Isles, 1875–1918 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013).
23 Era, 21 January 1872 (perhaps Henry Howe).
24 Antonio Ghislanzoni based his libretto on a story written for the purpose by the
Egyptologist Auguste Mariette (see also n. 68 below), which was elaborated into a
detailed scenario by Camille Du Locle and Verdi.
25 On performances of Aida between 1871 and 1881, see Marcello Conati’s list in
Saleh Abdoun, ed., Genesi dell’ ‘Aida’ (Parma: Istituto di Studi Verdiani, 1971);
for a broader chronological listing, see Aïda: Verdi (Paris: L’Avant-Scène, 1976),
pp. 109–25, with a list of early performances worldwide on p. 109.
26 Not until 22 March 1880 was the opera heard at the Opéra, in French as Aïda,
again with Verdi at the helm.
27 See the discussion in Weber, The Great Transformation of Musical Taste, p. 276;
see also Ringel, ‘Opera’, p. 124.
28 On the role of managers in programming, on Gye’s aesthetic considerations, and
on the infrastructure of the opera world in London, see Dideriksen and Ringel,
‘Frederick Gye’, pp. 11–18 and 21–4. The stagnation of the repertoire through 1881
is discussed also in Rodmell, Opera, esp. pp. 6–38.
composers, and thus during the 1850s the company offered a fair amount of
French opera.29 Through the 1860s and 1870s, enduring what George Bernard
Shaw later stigmatized as ‘the Donizettian dark ages’, 30 both opera companies
experienced a steep decline in the staging of new operas. This was a consequence
of several interrelated factors, among them, fewer new operas being written, lack
of uniformity and stability in international copyright conventions, and increasing
production expenses.31
Within this London programming environment Verdi’s operas – from their
first appearance with Ernani in 1845 through the London premiere of Aida in
1876 – seemed to fall in and out of favour with London opera-house managers. At
Her Majesty’s Theatre a half dozen of the composer’s operas had frequently been
programmed by Lumley in the late 1840s, though less so in the early 1850s; while
at the Royal Italian Opera, from 1847 through 1852 Gye produced only Ernani
and Nabucco (the latter censored and under the title Anato). Upon the temporary
closure of Her Majesty’s Theatre (1853–55), other Verdi operas began appearing
more frequently on Gye’s stage, including the London premieres of both Rigoletto
and Il trovatore, and by 1855 the composer’s works accounted for 21% of the Royal
Italian Opera’s offerings.32 Once opera production resumed at Her Majesty’s,
there was a fairly regular stream of Verdian opera at both houses. Between 1861
and 1875, the Royal Italian Opera staged 1,432 performances of fifty-two different
operas, 147 (just over 10%) of those were of seven operas by Verdi (constituting
13.5% of the offerings): Rigoletto (composed 1851), La traviata (1853), Il trovatore
(1853) and Un ballo in maschera (1859) – all of which appeared with some
regularity – Don Carlos (1867, in Italian as Don Carlo, discussed on pp. 231–6
29 On Gye’s predilections for French grand opera, see Dideriksen and Ringel,
‘Frederick Gye’, pp. 14–16. On the extent of the French repertoire at his company
in the 1850s, including French operas by Italian composers, see Dideriksen,
‘Repertory and Rivalry’, e.g., pp. 195–6.
30 Shaw’s phrase can be found in The World, 1890; cited in George Bernard Shaw,
Music in London, 1890–1894, 3 vols (London: Constable, 1934), vol. 1, p. 1.
31 Ringel (‘Opera’, esp. pp. 71–5) discusses the decline. That opera composers were
not as prolific during this period was in part a consequence of the volatile political
and economic climate on the Continent (in Italy conflicts related to independence
and unification) and in part a result of new copyright laws (enacted in Italy in
1865) that enabled composers to gain financially from future performances of their
works. Prior to the Berne Convention (1886) the process of obtaining performance
rights was cumbersome for opera managers, who had to negotiate with multiple
parties (composers, publishers, singers) and to consider ever-changing laws in
various countries. The escalating costs included not only engaging appropriate
singers and designing impressive sets and costumes, and maintaining a grand
physical plant, but sometimes also the expense of obtaining exclusive performance
rights, all of which contributed to making opera one of the most expensive
entertainments of the era.
32 For a detailed discussion of the repertoire, see Dideriksen, ‘Repertory and Rivalry’,
pp. 179–204.
below) and, beginning in 1873, Ernani (1844), and in 1874, Luisa Miller (1849).33
During the same period, Her Majesty’s Opera staged 1,156 performances of
fifty-one different operas; 138 (nearly 12%) of those were of seven Verdi operas
(13.7% of the offerings): I Lombardi alla Prima crociata (1843), Ernani, Rigoletto,
Il trovatore, La traviata, Un ballo in maschera and La forza del destino (1862,
revised 1869, about which more on p. 236 below).34 Other Verdi operas heard in
London during these years, which, however, did not remain ‘in the repertoire’,
were I due Foscari (composed 1844), I masnadieri (1847), Attila (1846) and I vespri
siciliani (1855). All of these Verdi works were ‘traditional’ Italian operas, very
much identifiable as Verdi’s and very much in the known (expected and accepted)
‘Italian style’ – with the exception of Don Carlo.
The French grand opera Don Carlos was the first Verdi opera heard in London
that did not follow the ‘norm’; it served as a prelude to Aida, albeit with a history
that differed with regard to its commercial viability. Over the years, Gye had
established a network of French connections in the music world,35 and thus Don
Carlos, written expressly for the Paris Opéra, offered the manager an opportunity
to bring the newest work of the famed Verdi to London immediately following its
11 March 1867 world premiere. As Gye publicized in the Royal Italian Opera’s 1867
season prospectus, new international copyright arrangements facilitated his swift
acquisition of exclusive rights to perform the brand new Verdi work in England.36
Nonetheless, the process was tedious and the undertaking expensive.
Having travelled to Paris in February, Gye was present during the rehearsal
period and attended Don Carlos’s first performance. Between 21 and 27 February
33 These were the seven Verdi operas officially listed as in the company’s ‘repertoire’
in the Royal Italian Opera’s 1876 season prospectus (Times, 4 March 1876; PMG,
7 March 1876); the list does not include others that may have been performed by
the company occasionally. The forty-eight operas, as listed in the Times, include:
six by Meyerbeer, three by Mozart, five by Rossini, seven by Donizetti, three
by Bellini, seven by Verdi, one by Flotow, four by Auber, one by Beethoven, one
by Gluck, two by Gounod and one each by the Ricci brothers (Federico and
Luigi), Weber, Thomas, Fabio Campana, Cimarosa, Józef (Giuseppe) Poniatowski,
Antonio Carlos Gomes and Wagner (Lohengrin, produced for the first time in
1875). The prospectus also included a list of new works, at least three of which were
projected for the coming season: Rossini’s Mosè in Egitto, Wagner’s Tannhäuser,
a revival of Donizetti’s L’elisir d’amore and (at the top of the list) Verdi’s Aida.
Ringel (‘Opera’, pp. 61–2) lists Luisa Miller with only two performances in 1874
and Ernani with two in 1873 and one in 1874; both works were staged apparently
because the prima donna Adelina Patti wished to sing the roles.
34 These figures are derived from Ringel, ‘Opera’, tables on pp. 61–4 compiled
from announcements in the Times and from Gye’s diaries. Gye and James Henry
Mapleson had each vied to have his respective company mount the London
premiere of La forza del destino; on the intrigues involved in this struggle, see ibid.,
pp. 148–51.
35 Dideriksen and Ringel, ‘Frederick Gye’, p. 14.
36 Times, 27 March 1867. Performance and publication rights with regard to grand
opera are treated in detail in Christian Sprang, Grand Opéra vor Gericht (Baden-
Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993).
1867, the manager worked out a contract with Verdi’s French publisher Léon
Escudier for sole rights in Great Britain and Ireland for performance for the
time allowed by (English) law (then, forty-two years or the life of the composer
plus seven years, whichever was longer)37 and for printing and selling the
libretto. Escudier agreed to furnish Gye with a libretto translation in Italian38
(the language in which the opera was to be performed in London) and several
copies of the piano-vocal score, as well as to deliver a copy of the full score; Gye
was to pay for the copying out of the full score (including instrumental parts
presumably) and the choral parts. The asking price was apparently fairly high,
£800 (£61,810 in 2013),39 payable in four monthly instalments from April through
July; and, since other impresarios in London had expressed interest, Gye had to
decline or accept the purchase by 14 March, promptly following the second Paris
performance of the opera. As negotiations proceeded, Gye attended the first
general rehearsal (on 24 February, though, perhaps significantly, he missed the
beginning of Act I), after which he noted with some dismay that the opera lasted
nearly five hours and did not have ‘the elements of success’.40 (As a consequence
of the length, Verdi himself implemented hefty cuts, deleting the introduction to
Act I and shortening two duets in Act II.) Even though, on 1 March, Gye mailed
his season prospectus to London, projecting Don Carlos as one of the potential
new operas for the coming season, he apparently was not convinced that the
opera was worth the asking price; for he tried (unsuccessfully), at least twice, to
get Escudier to ‘sell it’ to him for less.41 After attending the premiere, Gye again
complained about the opera’s length, noting that although there was some
‘effective music’ and good melody, the first act was ‘bad and useless’. His final
verdict: although Don Carlos would never be a ‘great success’ in England, it might
endure for a few nights – with modifications and cuts.42
Figure 10.1 Scene from Don Carlo at the Royal Italian Opera, Illustrated London News, 13 July 1867
[Courtesy of the University of Iowa Libraries, Special Collections]
That is how it was performed at the Royal Italian Opera. The company’s
conductor and music director Michael Costa prepared a modified version using
the Italian libretto that Escudier supplied (titled Don Carlo): he omitted the first
act (at Gye’s behest perhaps?), moved Carlo’s first-act aria to the third act, cut
the ballet (Gye did not stage ballet at his house), and shortened two numbers.43
And with what were considered Costa’s ‘judicious curtailments’, Don Carlo, an
opera that could ‘weary out the endurance of an English public’, 44 had its London
premiere on 4 June 1867 (Fig. 10.1).
As Verdi’s newest opera, Don Carlo(s) was an important acquisition for
Gye, and his presentation appears to have been the first outside the opera’s
Paris birthplace. The manager ‘did all he could to ensure success’,45 putting his
full resources behind the production, making new sets and costumes, casting
his top singers, and bringing it out ‘in an unprecedently [sic] short time’.46
Commentators universally proclaimed the performance and the scenery
even though he had been given a box by Escudier after having agreed to ‘purchase’
the opera; GD, 15 March 1867.
43 On the London Don Carlo, see Budden, The Operas of Verdi, vol. 3, p. 27; see also
Harry R. Beard, ‘Don Carlos on the London Stage, 1676–1969’, Atti del Congresso
internazionale di Studi verdiani II (Parma: Istituto di Studi Verdiani, 1971),
pp. 59–69, esp. pp. 66–7. On Costa, see John Goulden, Michael Costa, England’s
First Conductor: The Revolution in Musical Performance in England, 1830–1880
(Farnham: Ashgate, 2015).
44 MW, 6 April 1867 (possibly James William Davison).
45 SR (Davison), 3 August 1867, reprinted in MW, 17 August 1867.
46 Ibid.
47 The cast included soprano Pauline Lucca, replaced at times by Helen Lemmens-
Sherrington, as Elisabeth, tenor Emile Naudin as Carlo, baritone Francesco
Graziani as Posa, bass Jules-Émile Petit as Philip, mezzo-soprano Antonietta
Fricci as Eboli and bass Enrico Bagagiolo as the Grand Inquisitor, under Costa’s
baton. New scenery was painted by one Mat Morgan, and Augustus Harris was
responsible for the full mounting of the opera (MW, 15 June 1867).
48 SR, 3 August 1867, reprinted in MW, 17 August 1867. Other Verdi operas drawn
from Schiller did not fare well in England: I masnadieri (Schiller’s Die Räuber) was
not performed after its world premiere season (1847, Her Majesty’s), and Luisa
Miller (Kabale und Liebe) featured only twice (1858, Her Majesty’s, and 1874, Royal
Italian Opera). Giovanna d’Arco (Die Jungfrau von Orleans), another political,
‘Catholic’ story, was not performed in London in the nineteenth century.
49 MW, 15 June 1867 (possibly Davison).
50 MW, 29 June 1867 (possibly Davison).
51 MW, 22 April 1867 (from a correspondent ‘M. W.’ ), about the Paris premiere.
Willson (‘Of Time and the City’) examines Parisian perceptions of the opera
against audiences’ prior knowledge and experience of Verdi’s Italian works and
against the status of grand opera in general, convincingly arguing that Don
Carlos mediated between past and present and was assessed within a process of
‘canonical listening’.
‘The Parisians did not understand Don Carlos’, and it ended up being ‘a
disappointment’. 52
If the French could not easily accept or understand Verdi’s French grand opera
as part of their national tradition, then it did not stand much chance of success –
as French grand opera disguised in Italian attire – with the English. Given that
only twelve weeks passed between the world premiere of Don Carlos and its
first London performance, the breadth and depth of what audiences could have
learned about the opera – from press previews and reports, or from published
scores or excerpts53 – or the extent to which they may have become invested
in the ideas relating to a new opera by Verdi would have been minimized. The
shortage of audience preparation time resulted in a lack of ‘acquaintance’ with
Don Carlo(s), doubtless contributing to poor saleability. In the end, even though,
or more likely because, London spectators and critics were familiar with French
grand opera (since it had long formed a good portion of repertoire at the Royal
Italian Opera), London commentators deemed the genre unsuccessful and boring
in Verdi’s hands. To English minds and ears Don Carlo did not fit the stereotype
for Verdi’s previous Italian style, nor did it compare well to Meyerbeer’s or
Auber’s French grand operas. The English were not alone: even Verdi’s French
publisher remarked in his house journal that the opera did not live up to those
of ‘the Italian Verdi, the true Verdi’,54 and readers of the Musical World were told
that Don Carlos belonged to ‘the false Verdi’. 55
Following the first performance, Gye observed (correctly) that the opera
would remain a failure:56 an additional six presentations brought in the lowest
receipts of the season.57 Despite the poor financial and critical fortunes of the
1867 performances, he planned to open his 1868 season, on 31 March, with Verdi’s
52 MW, 6 April 1867 (an unnamed correspondent, dated 3 April, from Paris).
53 Verdi’s Italian publisher Ricordi and his French publisher Escudier issued piano-
vocal scores, the former with Italian text and the latter with French and the Italian
translation (by Achille de Lauzières), of the original five-act version. Ricordi’s
publications included a deluxe edition, with a portrait of Verdi and G. Gonin’s
[probably Francesco Gonin] scenic renditions. It is possible that Ricordi’s
publications were sold in the shops of his London affiliates before the English
performances, although no advertisements appeared in London newspapers and
no other evidence has come to light. There seem to have been no ‘special’ English
editions issued in England before the London performances. The Royal Italian
Opera issued its own libretto (as usual): ‘Don Carlos, an Opera, in Four Acts,
the Music by Verdi […] The English version by Thomas J. Williams […] London:
J. Miles’.
54 Léon Escudier, in L’art musical, 28 March 1867, from Hervé Gartioux, ed.,
Giuseppe Verdi, Don Carlos: Dossier de presse parisienne (1867) (Heilbronn: Lucie
Galland, 1997), p. 213; cit. in Willson, ‘Of Time and the City’, p. 196.
55 MW, 16 March 1867 (correspondent ‘Figaro’), published in French.
56 GD, 4 June 1867.
57 Ringel, ‘Opera’, pp. 62, 169 and 223. As a result, Gye did not want to pay the final
instalment (though he did do so), and lawyers became involved; GD, 1, 2 and
6 August 1867.
opera, presumably to recoup costs from the previous year; but because of casting
difficulties he substituted Bellini’s Norma. When Don Carlo was staged two nights
later, it again had one of the smallest takes of the season (£76 = £5,966 in 2013).58
The opera, commercially unviable, fell out of the active repertoire and does not
appear to have been performed in London again in the nineteenth century.59
London’s discomfort with Don Carlo did not pave the way smoothly for Aida.
Neither did operatic activities and general musical climate. In the nine years
between the first stagings of Don Carlo and those of Aida, London audiences
had little exposure to new operas, and the only other new (to London) Verdi
opera that they heard was La forza del destino (composed for St Petersburg in
1862), which had its first performance at Her Majesty’s Opera on 22 June 1867,
in competition with the run of Don Carlo down the road. Critical opinion was
less than enthusiastic for Forza. Deemed by some London commentators as
having been written in ‘a style founded on the German school’, 60 the opera was
commonly perceived neither as being at the (low) level of Don Carlo with regard
to French opera nor as living up to the quality of Verdi’s previous Italian operas. It
was long, its story unnecessarily horrible, and the ‘cleverly wrought’ music did not
possess ‘sufficient specialty of character or variety of interest to counteract the
dead weight of the libretto’.61 The opera had three performances that season and
was revived only once in London during the nineteenth century.62 The next new
Verdi work heard in London – the Messa da Requiem (composed 1874), of which
Verdi conducted five successful performances in May 1875 at the Royal Albert
Hall – provided audiences with another opportunity to hear a new, critically
controversial Verdi work.63 Elsewhere, the Requiem had been seen as heralding
a change in Verdi’s ‘garb’ and a work in which Verdi had capitulated to German
ideals, as Gundula Kreuzer has discussed.64 In London too, the work confused
critics, who also entered the widespread debate about its secular (operatic) versus
sacred flavour and its non-Italian nature.65
the secular/sacred debate as well as the effect of the Requiem’s Catholic character
for a mainly Protestant English audience.
66 See, for instance, David Gange, Dialogues with the Dead: Egyptology in British
Culture and Religion, 1822–1922 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013). Telling
also are George Ebers, Egypt: Descriptive, Historical, and Picturesque, trans. [from
the original German] Clara Bell, 2 vols (London: Cassell, 1878), the frequent
newspaper headlines concerning archaeological discoveries in Egypt, and
travelogues.
67 DN, 6 January 1872; translation of commentary by a correspondent of
Indépendence Belge.
68 The Egyptian Museum of Antiquities at Bulaq (Cairo) was established in 1858,
under the direction of Auguste Mariette (1821–81), author of the original story on
which Aida was based. Vassalli (1812–87), an Italian artist-antiquarian who settled
in Egypt in 1859, served as Mariette’s museum assistant.
69 DN, 6 January 1872 (cit. in n. 67 above).
have gone to Milan to negotiate with Verdi to present Aida in London but that ‘it
is probable that the terms asked for the right of representation have dismayed Mr.
Gye’ (23 March).
87 GD, 17 January 1875; cited in Dideriksen and Ringel, ‘Frederick Gye’, p. 18.
88 Athenaeum, 1 July 1876 (probably Charles Lewis Gruneisen).
89 Ibid. also remarks on the various reasons for staging Aida, including its European
travels and the role of the Requiem.
90 Intervening for Gye was the Italian baritone Achille Ardavani (1826–89), whom
Gye undoubtedly knew, for he had sung in London, Paris and the United States;
GD, 20 to 23 February 1876.
91 GD, 23 February 1876.
92 At first Gye planned on the young American soprano Florence Rice-Knox (Ricca-
Knox), new to London, offering not only to pay her expenses to Paris to hear Maria
Figure 10.2
Adelina Patti as Aida at
the Royal Italian Opera in
1876, Illustrated London
News, 24 May 1879, from a
photograph by the London
Stereoscopic Company
[Courtesy of the University
of Iowa Libraries, Special
Collections]
been undertaken, for the opera was reported to have been in rehearsal in early
May.93
As publisher of Aida, Ricordi was also preparing for the opera’s English
premiere by issuing special musical editions to make the opera ‘known to all
classes of amateurs’94 in England. One advertisement read:
Waldmann sing the role but also to have the well-known voice teacher Francesco
Lamperti teach her the part in London, but that plan fell through. Rice (1850–1914)
married the American businessman Edward M. Knox (1842–1916) in 1871; she was
not the wife or the daughter of Colonel Brownlow William Knox (d. 1873), who had
previously been one of Gye’s financial backers. (MW, 25 August 1877, published
two letters from Ricca-Knox concerning shoddy treatment by Gye and the English
press during her time at the Royal Italian Opera.) Next, Gye turned to soprano
Anna D’Angeri, who was in the season’s company; she declined because she felt
that the part was too low for her. He also sought advice from his conductor for
Aida, Enrico Bevignani, about Antonietta Pozzoni (creator of Aida at the Cairo
premiere and interpreter of Amneris in some Italian productions opposite Teresa
Stolz’s Aida), but (for unstated reasons) she too was unattainable.
93 ILN, 13 May 1876 (unidentified author). Gye lamented that rehearsals were plagued
by problems among the singers; GD, 20 June 1876. Other members of the cast
included tenor Ernesto Nicolini as Radames, baritone Francesco Graziani as
Amonasro, bass Federico Feitlinger as the King and bass Giovanni Capponi as
Ramfis.
94 PMG, 30 June 1876 (Henry Sutherland Edwards).
Aida – Verdi’s latest opera, performed with the greatest success in all the
best theatres of the Continent and in America – is shortly to be produced
at the Royal Italian Opera, Covent-Garden. – Splendid Editions of this
Opera, complete, for Voice and Pianoforte, and Pianoforte Solo and Duet,
illustrated in chromolithography, from 8s. Special English Edition for the
Pianoforte, and words to the leading subjects, with description of the plot
and thematic references to the music; also the Portrait of the Author, his
autograph and biography, net 4s. The songs and separate vocal pieces – a
hundred and fifty arrangements, fantasias, &c., List of which may be had,
post-free, of the Proprietor of the music, the libretto, and the English
translation. – Ricordi’s Dépôt, 23, Charles-street, Middlesex Hospital,
London, W.; and all Musicsellers.95
The ‘Special English Edition’ contained an ‘analysis’ of the opera by the organist
of the Royal Italian Opera, Josiah Pittman,96 and the recent availability of
this ‘inexpensive edition’ was praised as an ‘opportunity […] [for] making
acquaintance with the music beforehand’.97 Thirteen pezzi staccati (individual
pieces) had been published in London in 1875 with Italian text and an English
translation.98 Some of Aida’s music could have been heard occasionally in
concert: one example, reported in the Illustrated London News (9 October
1875), was a performance at the Covent Garden Theatre, conducted by Luigi
Arditi,99 who had ‘very effectively made’ an arrangement ‘of some of the principal
portions of “Aida”’, including ‘vocal pieces, the instrumental prelude to the
opera, ballet and procession music, &c.’ for orchestra, which in the performance
was ‘supplemented by the band of the Coldstream Guards’. This commentator
concluded: ‘The “Aida” selections will no doubt prove to be a powerful attraction,
as offering specimens of a remarkable work which has yet to be produced on
our opera stage’. Thus, although there appear to have been no ‘Englished’ vocal
excerpts or stage adaptations preceding Aida, as would have been customary for
Verdi’s operas earlier in the century, there were means through which consumers
could become acquainted with the opera.
95 This ran in issues of the weekly ILN (on 27 May and 10 June). The same ad
continued to run sporadically, e.g., in MW, 19 August 1876. The Academy, 27 May
1876 (perhaps Ebenezer Prout), also mentioned that ‘a cheap and convenient
edition’ could be obtained in London by ‘those who may wish to make previous
acquaintance with the music’.
96 PMG, 30 June 1876 (Edwards).
97 ILN, 10 June 1876, ‘music’ column.
98 Plate numbers 44383–44398 in ‘Ricordi’s vocal album for amateurs’ series;
see Maria Adelaide Bacherini Bartoli, ‘Aggiunte integrazioni e rettifiche alla
“Bibliography of the Works of Giuseppe Verdi” di Cecil Hopkinson: Edizioni
verdiane nella Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze’, Studi Verdiani 4 (1986–87),
110–35, at p. 129.
99 The permissions that Ricordi had granted to Arditi to make arrangements and
potpourris for his London concerts caused a small wrinkle in Gye’s negotiations
with the publisher; GD, 23 and 24 February 1876.
Familiarity with Aida – both intellectual (reading commentaries and studying
scores) and sensual (hearing and ‘performing’ music) – would have contributed
to the public’s eagerness to see the opera on stage. As an (unidentified) writer
for the Era (25 June 1876) explained: ‘The work has been the cause of no little
excitement in the musical world, and so great has been the desire to hear it that
every place was secured nearly a fortnight ago’; the critic also reported that ‘the
places are going off at a tremendous rate and at a tremendous price. The dealers
in tickets […] have been charging double – aye, and treble prices for seats.’ Gye’s
proclamation that at its London premiere Aida met with ‘great success’ (with
opening-night receipts totalling £608 and most of those thereafter even higher)
rings true.100 Critics reported that the opera drew ‘the most crowded house of the
season’, 101 emphasizing that its five performances, despite appearing so late in the
season, were additional testimony to its triumph.102
The production was not only a financial but also a critical success.
Apprehension over how staging would be handled at the Royal Italian
Opera proved groundless: it was ‘simply magnificent: characteristic scenery,
characteristic costumes, characteristic ballet, characteristic pageantry of every
kind’. 103 The critic for the Era (25 June 1876) remarked in unusual detail (perhaps
a reflection of Victorian interest in all things Egyptian): ‘Rarely have we seen
anything more beautiful than the view of the temple on the banks of the Nile,
with the pyramids in the distance, the waters of the sacred river reflecting the
moonlight, and the stars glittering down upon the strange customs and rites
of antique fane.’ The principal performers were ‘almost irreproachable’: Patti
performed with intelligence and pathos, breathing ‘the breath of dramatic life’
into Aida;104 she was supported admirably by Gindele, who sang ‘artistically’ and
was ‘a most powerful actress’. 105 The chorus and orchestra, though heavily taxed,
performed extremely well, under the ‘careful and zealous’ conducting of Enrico
Bevignani.106
For Aida’s music, however, critical reception remained mixed, as had
been the norm elsewhere and as had long been the case for Verdi’s operas in
100 GD, 22 June 1876. There were four additional performances in 1876, which also
brought in excellent receipts: 24 June, £559; a morning performance on 5 July,
£826; 7 July, undesignated; the final performance on 10 July, £694 (GD, 24 June,
5 July and 10 July, respectively). To put this into some perspective, Gye’s average
annual profit 1872–77 was £15,500 (£1,272,000 in 2013); Times, 21 July 1881, cit. in
Rodmell, Opera, p. 37 n. 9.
101 PMG, 30 June 1876 (Edwards).
102 MW, 29 July 1876, remarked that the number of performances for Aida indicated
success, noting similarly for Tannhäuser, which, having come out earlier that
season, received eight performances.
103 Graphic, 1 July 1876 (probably Davison).
104 PMG, 30 June 1876 (Edwards).
105 MP, 23 June 1876 (probably William Alexander Barrett).
106 Times, 26 June 1876 (Davison). Bevignani had conducted six performances of Aida
in Moscow between 1 and 15 January 1876.
107 Commentary was undoubtedly affected also by biases of critics who may have
favoured Gye and his Royal Italian Opera over his competition and vice versa, but
given the extent to which it echoes Continental comments, that would appear to
have been a minor consideration. On the vicissitudes of the press with regard to
Verdi, see Langley, ‘Italian Opera’, and Valenti, ‘Verdi Reception’.
108 See, e.g. Standard, 23 June 1876 (probably Desmond Ryan).
109 It is curious that earlier in the century, Verdi’s English detractors complained, as
did Henry Chorley about Rigoletto, that Verdi’s music did not display ‘intellect
and expression – which is French or German – as distinguished from […] melody,
which is Italian’; Athenaeum, 21 May 1853.
110 See Kreuzer, Verdi and the Germans, p. 114.
111 Era, 21 January 1872 (perhaps Howe).
112 Athenaeum, 1 July 1876 (probably Gruneisen).
113 Graphic, 8 July 1876 (perhaps Davison).
114 MT, 1 July 1876 (perhaps Bennett).
115 MP, 23 June 1876 (probably Barrett).
Whatever the specific perceptions may have been, Aida was deemed atypical
of Italian opera and of Verdian style; and unlike Don Carlos, Aida could not be
excused by conventions of a different operatic tradition. Thus Aida left many
commentators at a loss with regard to its classification, leading the (anonymous)
critic for the Musical Times (1 August 1876) to conclude cynically: ‘as it belongs
to no recognized school, we may presume [it] to be Egyptian’. With a marked
decrease in the availability of the kinds of consumer products that had previously
helped educate the public about new operas, the perceptions expressed in the
press carried greater weight. And, thus, for London audiences, it was precisely
what commentators discussed – Aida’s precarious profile, its ‘failure’ to fit an
anticipated mould, its challenges to expectations, its exoticism, novelty, and
uniqueness – that combined to make the opera a coveted cultural object and a
commercial success.116 Within the cultural marketplace of 1870s London,117 Aida
hovered between the old and the new, the expected and the unexpected, the
exotic and the commonplace, the ‘true’ and the ‘false’ Verdi, representing multiple
ideas of art music. This may have been an important consideration, for at a
time of transition when enthusiasm for Italian opera had waned, Aida ‘made it
flicker for a while’.118 The opera’s success in 1876 at the Royal Italian Opera led
to frequent performances there in subsequent seasons (immediately, three in 1877
and in 1878) and a production (eleven performances) in 1879 at Her Majesty’s
Opera under James Henry Mapleson.119 And at the Grand Opera Syndicate at
Covent Garden between 1897 and 1914, Aida stood proudly as the fourth most
frequently performed opera.120
116 By the time of Aida’s London premiere, with English opera audiences no longer
elitist and exclusive, cultural capital and public taste had shifted. See, e.g., Michael
Booth, Theatre in the Victorian Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1991), esp. pp. 21–6, and Hall-Witt, Fashionable Acts.
117 From the mid 1870s through the late 1880s, as Paul Rodmell (Opera, pp. 35–7)
has discussed, the environment in London’s opera world became less receptive
to Italian opera in general, with artistic policy focusing more on singers than on
repertoire; and the genre’s popularity, even more than previously, began to wane.
See also Henry C. Lunn, ‘The London Musical Season’, MT, 1 August 1876.
118 MW, 7 January 1882, expressed the opinion that this was true by 1881; cit. in
Rodmell, Opera, pp. 37–8.
119 Performances for the Royal Italian Opera from Ringel, ‘Opera’, p. 62. Statistics
for Her Majesty’s Opera from Rodmell, Opera, p. 37, which indicates 1878 as the
year of the Aida production; in a private communication (23 July 2014), Rodmell
confirmed, however, that the year was 1879.
120 Rodmell, Opera, p. 84, counts seventy-seven performances of Aida (outnumbering
it were two new Puccini works, La bohème with 106 performances and Madama
Butterfly with ninety-one, as well Gounod’s Faust with ninety-three). London
would wait thirteen years to hear another new Verdi opera: Otello (composed
1887) was heard at the Royal Lyceum Theatre (a company from Milan under the
London manager M. L. Mayer) in July 1889, and later Falstaff (1893) at Covent
Garden (the Royal Opera under Augustus Harris) in May 1894. Then, the issues
under consideration with regard to reception and financial success were very
different.
121 Shaw’s farewell as theatre critic for the Saturday Review, ‘Valedictory’, SR, 21 May
1898.
would have differed for the two operas. In 1867, closer to the works (of the 1850s)
perceived as ‘true’ Verdi, audiences may not have been equipped to accept the
‘false’ Verdi. By 1876, having heard Don Carlo and the Messa da Requiem (as well
as La forza del destino) and with Wagner and other new composers (above all
Gounod) in their ears and on their minds, the public was ready to grasp the idea
that Verdi was writing ‘modern’ works.
Settings
Travel support for this article was provided by the Central Research Development
Fund at the University of Pittsburgh. For their assistance and insights during the
writing of this article, I would like to thank Peter Cohen, Don O. Franklin, Robert
Marshall, Traute Marshall, William Weber and Peter Wollny. I am also grateful
to the staffs of the Nikolaikirche in Leipzig, the Leipziger Messe Archiv, the Bach-
Archiv Leipzig, the Stadtarchiv Leipzig, the Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, the
University of Houston Libraries, and especially the Stadtgeschichtliches Museum
Leipzig and Thomaskirche in Leipzig.
250
after the hall’s construction and has appeared in eponymous halls ever
since.2
Although Hiller’s booklet is recognized as the moment this adage first became
associated with the Gewandhaus, less notice has been taken of Hiller’s essay
itself, and particularly of Hiller’s choice to discuss Seneca’s words in connection
to sacred, rather than secular, music. And while a spectator in the Gewandhaus
might interpret the motto as a declaration that the music performed in the space
is – and should be – something more than mere entertainment, Hiller’s original
intent was more closely related to sacred music’s role in public concert life:
True joy is a very serious matter, says Seneca. The conviction of the truth
of this statement, and the confidence in the right-thinking of our Leipzig
residents, who exceed [those of ] so many German cities in their love of
music, have called for the newly established Musikübende Gesellschaft to
perform so-called Concerts Spirituels during Advent and Lent, in which
not only serious operas and oratorios would be performed, but also other
large pieces of sacred music. In this last category are primarily understood
to be those Latin chants [i.e., texts] that have been known since the earliest
days of the Christian service.3
Indeed, Hiller attests here not only to the demand of Leipzig’s citizens that the
nature of the penitential seasons be respected (and thus reflected in the concert
repertoire), but also to the idea that service to God was one of music’s essential
functions and therefore should be a pillar of public concert life.
The observance of Advent and Lent through the performance of Concerts
Spirituels was not unique to Leipzig; the first commercial concert enterprise, the
Paris Concert Spirituel, was founded in 1725 specifically to produce programmes
of instrumental and sacred music during the penitential seasons. But there
and in the other cities where subscription-supported concerts emerged over
the course of the eighteenth century, the church exerted little, if any, influence
on concert programming. Unlike Leipzig, those cities often saw their concert
organizations spring from secular institutions like the court or opera and from
2 For a broader study of the motto’s history, see Wilhelm Siedel, ‘“ Res severa
verum gaudium”: Über den Wahlspruch des Gewandhauses in Leipzig’, Die
Musikforschung 50 (1997), 1–9.
3 Translations throughout this article are mine unless otherwise indicated. [Johann
Adam Hiller], Texte der lateinischen Musiken, die im Concert Spirituel zu Leipzig,
bey gewissen feyerlichen Gelegenheiten aufgeführt werden (Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1778),
pp. 4–5; original in Stadtgeschichtliches Museum, Leipzig [hereafter D-LEsm],
Textbücher 222. While the essay in the text book is admittedly unsigned, it is
highly unlikely – given his position as the Musikübende Gesellschaft’s director
and as the city’s most prominent music journalist – that it could have been
written by anyone but Hiller. The style and content are also markedly similar to
his writings elsewhere, such as in his journal, the Wöchentliche Nachrichten und
Anmerkungen die Musik betreffend.
theatre companies.4 In the absence of such institutions,5 Leipzig concert life was
disproportionately influenced by that city’s unusually powerful and centralized
church music establishment, which was headed by the Thomaskantor.6 Indeed,
despite the paucity of documentation from the early years of Leipzig’s public
concerts, ties to the church are readily apparent even in the earliest subscription
series: the Grosse Concert (established in 1743), whose first recorded musical
director was Johann Friedrich Doles, then a student of Thomaskantor Johann
Sebastian Bach. (For a timeline of the period under study here and the persons
involved, see Table 11.1.) While Doles’s tenure was brief (he left Leipzig in May
1744 for an eleven-year stint as cantor in Freiberg, after which he returned to fill
his teacher’s post), his immediate successors had similarly strong ties to the city’s
massive sacred music enterprise, the result of which was a clear path of influence
from the sacred to the secular music worlds. This tendency evidenced itself
in numerous ways throughout the late eighteenth century, including Concerts
Spirituels that mirrored church music repertoire trends, the liturgical calendar
and even the liturgy itself.7
In the first decades of the nineteenth century, however, the flow of influence
from church to concert hall gradually diminished and then – quite surprisingly –
fully reversed itself as the Gewandhaus grew in prominence and eclipsed the
churches as the city’s musical focal point. A primary factor in that reversal was a
decline in church attendance, a crisis that had been building since the last decade
of the eighteenth century. In an effort to stem the decline, nineteenth-century
Thomaskantors leveraged the prestige that the Gewandhaus concerts had lent to
the middle-class’s consumption of art music by developing a style of sacred music
programming designed to drive similar ‘audiences’ into the church. As a result,
the lines between art music, commercial practice and sacred music became even
more blurred.
4 Jeffrey S. Sposato, ‘“ The Joyous Light of Day”: New Year’s Day Music in Leipzig,
1781–1847’, Music & Letters 92 (2011), 202–29, esp. pp. 206–12.
5 While operas and singspiels (staged by itinerant companies) were performed in
Leipzig, these were not sources of regular employment for orchestral musicians
during the formative years of the public subscription concert, nor did they have
nearly the importance or influence of the church music establishment. The theatre
orchestra that eventually formed in 1766 was little more than a pick-up group,
many of whose members were performers from the Grosse Concert who had been
recommended by Hiller. Ibid., p. 209 n. 40.
6 Leipzig’s Thomaskantor was directly responsible for all of the music performed
at the city’s two main churches, the Thomaskirche (St Thomas) and the
Nikolaikirche (St Nicholas), and supervised music at the Neukirche (New Church)
and at the Peterskirche (St Peter). The choirs that served these churches (the
Thomanerchor) were all students at the Thomasschule (St Thomas School), where
the Thomaskantor lived and taught.
7 A detailed study of these correspondences and the overall influence of the church
on concert programming will appear in my forthcoming monograph, Leipzig After
Bach: Church and Concert Life in a German City, 1743–1847.
Table 11.1 Timeline of Leipzig Thomaskantors and the Kapellmeisters of the city’s leading
subscription concert series
1780
J. G. Schicht (GH, 1785–1810)
J. A. Hiller (1789–1804)
1800
A. E. Müller (1804–10)
J. P. C. Schulz (GH, 1810–27) J. G. Schicht (1810–23)
1820
C. A. Pohlenz (GH, 1827–35) C. T. Weinlig (1823–42)
Key:
GC = Grosse Concert (founded 1743)
MG = Musikübende Gesellschaft (founded c. 1775, see note b overleaf )
GH = Gewandhauskonzerte (founded 1781)
9 Müller was not a particularly active sacred music composer, having written
only eleven cantatas and a small number of motets, and he does not appear to
have been an especially effective cantor. As Friedrich Rochlitz noted in Müller’s
obituary, as Thomaskantor, Müller ‘did a lot of good for music: truth be told,
however, he did less well as a singing teacher, and was not in his element as a
pedagogue’. Friedrich Rochlitz, ‘August Eberhard Müller, grossherzogl. sächs.
weimar. Kapellmeister in Weimar’, AMZ 19, no. 52 (1817), p. 888.
10 Unless otherwise noted, my assessments of Leipzig concert traditions are based on
Gewandhaus programmes in D-LEsm and from the summary of concert content
in D-LEsm, IN 222 (‘Kurze Geschichte der Konzerte im Gewandhause’). When
discussing individual programmes in depth, I use the museum’s recently assigned
catalogue numbers (rather than the much less precise carton numbers previously
in use), which appear in Bert Hagels, Konzerte in Leipzig 1779/80–1847/48: Eine
Statistik (Berlin: Ries & Erler, 2009).
number until Schicht stepped down as both Gewandhaus and Neukirche music
director in 1810 to become Thomaskantor.
Whereas Hiller had been prohibited from directing concerts outside of the
churches,11 Schicht remained in charge of sacred music performances at the
Gewandhaus even after Johann Philipp Christian Schulz assumed the concerts’
directorship in 1810. According to Alfred Dörffel, this arrangement was due in
part to the Gewandhaus’s need for access to Schicht’s sacred music library, which
included many of the works performed in the concert hall during his tenure. Thus,
a deal was struck in which Schicht would allow access to the library in exchange
for maintaining control, at least for a time, over the concerts that included
sacred music.12 Schicht finally left the Gewandhaus in 1816, when the effects of
age forced him also to resign his directorship of the Singakademie he founded in
1802.13
Part of the reason Schicht felt compelled to cultivate sacred music at the
Gewandhaus was likely because of its decreased presence in the churches, a
result of changes that had been instituted in the 1780s and 1790s as part of the
Enlightenment-based Rationalist movement within the Lutheran church. The
movement acknowledged that the church’s role in society had diminished in
favour of commerce and other secular concerns, resulting in a marked decline
in church attendance – a trend it hoped to reverse through, among other
things, liturgical changes. These efforts began with the hiring of Thomaskirche
Pastor Johann Georg Rosenmüller, a Rationalist, as church superintendent in
1785. Shortly after taking his office, he charged that ‘The ultimate goal [of the
liturgy] should be to increase the solemnity of a reasoned-Christian [‘vernünftig-
christlichen’] service’ and warned that the continued use of the archaic sixteenth-
century form, with its outmoded language, was being ‘treated with greater scorn
every day’. 14 His suggestions for modernization were extensive and diverse,15
but that he saw a reduction in the use of Latin as essential is demonstrated by
a comment included in his call for updated hymnals. There he reflected on
developments in Catholic masses in Germany, noting that it was ‘not in the spirit
of Luther if in many evangelical churches Latin singing and praying still goes on
11 Johann Adam Hiller, Mein Leben: Autobiographie, Briefe und Nekrologe (Leipzig:
Lehmstedt, 2004), p. 98.
12 Alfred Dörffel, Geschichte der Gewandhausconcerte zu Leipzig, vom 25. November
1781 bis 25. November 1881 (Leipzig: [n.p.], 1884), p. 45.
13 ‘Notizen’, AMZ 18, no. 24 (1816), p. 406.
14 Johann Georg Rosenmüller, Pastoralanweisung zum Gebrauch akademischer
Vorlesungen (Leipzig: Georg Emanuel Beer, 1788), pp. 125, 131.
15 For more on Rosenmüller’s changes to the Leipzig services, see Günther Stiller,
Johann Sebastian Bach and Liturgical Life in Leipzig, ed. Robin Leaver, English
trans. by Herbert Bouman, Daniel Poellot and Hilton Oswald (St Louis, MO:
Concordia, 1984), pp. 158–66; Christiane Goebel, ‘Vernunft und Frömmigkeit
(1700–1830)’, St. Thomas zu Leipzig, ed. Herbert Stiehl (Berlin: Evangelische
Verlagsanstalt, 1984), pp. 82–3.
in a time when even Catholics are beginning to introduce German songs and
prayers into their services’. 16
In Hiller, Rosenmüller found a willing partner for his reform efforts, and
when Hiller assumed his post as Thomaskantor, he began excising Latin music
from the service. In his first year alone he exchanged the Latin motets commonly
sung at the beginning of the mass on ordinary Sundays with German ones and
severely limited the singing of the Latin ordinarium, particularly the Kyrie, which
was now sung in German (as the chorale Kyrie, Gott Vater in Ewigkeit) even on
some feast days.17 Services were also significantly shorter, with the music segment
(which took place just before the readings) typically consisting of a short cantata
made up of a single chorus, aria or duet, and chorale. (An additional short, single-
movement piece was performed during the distribution of communion.)18
In the end, the Rosenmüller/Hiller reforms did little to stem the tide of
secularization, as communion attendance figures bear out. The average number
of communicants annually in Leipzig’s two main churches, the Thomaskirche
and Nikolaikirche, was 27,774 between 1740 and 1790, after which the numbers
dropped off sharply: by 1810, the number was less than half (11,519), despite a
growing population.19 The next year, King Friedrich August I was forced to issue
a mandate for ‘the appropriate observance of Sundays, Feast days, and days of
penance’, in which he called for ‘everything that contributes to the desecration
of public worship and rest from the week’s work to be exorcised as much as
possible on the dedicated days [of worship]’. The edict effectively gave many
traditional practices the force of law. For instance, working or engaging in other
noisy secular activities (music-making, dancing, drinking, etc.) during prohibited
hours and days was now punishable by a five-thaler fine. Disturbances within the
service itself – such as leaving early – were also strongly discouraged.20
Particularly revealing, however, is that the king took the mandate as an
opportunity to implore his subjects to attend services regularly (‘We hope
to encourage every Christian, without legal reminder and order, […] to take
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid.
23 Tanya Kevorkian, Baroque Piety: Religion, Society, and Music in Leipzig, 1650–1750
(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), p. 33.
24 D-LEsm, MT/2645/2006. As a matter of policy, excerpts from ‘serious operas’
were considered valid repertoire options for Concerts Spirituels, according to
how the series was defined by the Directorium of both the Grosse Concert in 1771
and the Gewandhauskonzerte in 1781. (See Claudius Böhm and Sven-W. Staps,
Das Leipziger Stadt- und Gewandhausorchester: Dokumente einer 250jährigen
Geschichte [Leipzig: Kunst und Touristik GmbH, 1993], p. 20; and Dörffel,
Geschichte, p. 16.) In practice, however, this never happened at the Gewandhaus
until the 1803 concert, after which it was not uncommon to find such extracts
among the programmes.
25 Although these incursions did not begin in earnest until 1804, before that point
there were two choral works that began to be included among those pieces
considered, like symphonies, to be ‘neutral’ and appropriate for any occasion:
Mozart’s Preis dir, Gottheit and Gottheit, Dir sey Preis und Ehre, both re-texted
choruses (nos. 1 and 6, respectively) from Mozart’s Thamos, König in Ägypten
(K. 345).
Figure 11.1 Gewandhaus Concert, programme of 2 March 1809 (D-LEsm, MT/2524/2006) [Courtesy of Stadtgeschichtliches Museum Leipzig]
02/02/2016 15:13
Schicht, Hauptmann, Mendelssohn and Sacred Music in Leipzig 261
30 Andreas Glöckner, ‘Die Musikpflege an der Leipziger Neukirche zur Zeit Johann
Sebastian Bachs’, Beiträge zur Bach-Forschung 8 (1990), 131–2.
31 See, for instance, listings in the Leipziger Tageblatt on 29 September and 6 October
1810 (performances of a Haydn missa – i.e., the Kyrie and Gloria – during the
Michaelismesse) and 4 and 11 May 1811 (performances of a Naumann missa during
the Jubilate- or Ostermesse).
32 The timing of the listings’ first appearance – exactly three weeks after he took
office on 31 March 1810 – all but guarantees that they were Schicht’s idea. At
the time of the first listings, the paper was titled Leipzig: Ein Tageblatt für
Einheimische und Auswärtige. The name later changed to Leipziger Tageblatt and
then to Leipziger Tageblatt und Anzeiger. In the interest of clarity, I will refer to it
as Leipziger Tageblatt throughout. The daily papers never reviewed or otherwise
commented on music in the churches, but reports of the works performed
(along with the occasional brief critique) would appear sporadically in Leipzig’s
Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung.
33 The listings in the Leipziger Tageblatt change from ‘Vesper’ in 1811 (see, for
instance, 24 December 1811, p. 699), to ‘grossen Vesper’ on 5 June 1813 (p. 624),
to ‘grossen Vesper’ and ‘Motetten’ on 16 December 1815 (p. 1400), to finally just
‘Motetten’ on 27 January 1816 (p. 107).
Figure 11.2 Sample Kirchenmusik listing from the Leipziger Tageblatt (printed here are those for
the Easter high feast from the issue dated 5 March 1817, p. 383) [Courtesy of Universitätsbibliothek
Leipzig, Bibliotheca Albertina]
As was the case under earlier cantors,36 vespers usually included two short
motets (often for double chorus), or one longer motet or cantata that would be
broken into two parts, as happened with works like Bach’s Jesu meine Freude
or Singet dem Herrn ein neues Lied.37 However, Schicht also programmed
movements from the mass (usually a Kyrie and Gloria, but the other ordinarium
segments also occasionally appeared), as well as excerpts from popular oratorios,
including Schicht’s own works, Handel’s Messiah, Haydn’s Creation and –
particularly near the Harvest Feast – Haydn’s Seasons. Indeed, the vespers were
so focused on interesting music that, for a time at least, the liturgical needs of
the service were not a consideration when making programming decisions. As a
result, Latin and German concerted Magnificat settings – once a staple of festal
vesper services – disappeared entirely during the first few years of Schicht’s
tenure in order to make room for more non-liturgical music.
In comparison to that of the vespers service, the repertoire of the
Hauptgottesdienst was more limited, with Schicht focused on a relatively
small number of composers, nearly all of whom were Germans active since
1750 and, more significantly, were well known to the Gewandhaus audiences
he was attempting to lure into the church. Indeed, he established a kind of
Kenner/Liebhaber divide between vespers and the Sunday service, with the
latter programming the better-known works and composers so as to make the
Hauptgottesdienst as musically appealing and approachable as possible. Several
of these composers became the focus of musical festivals of a sort, where Schicht
presented a series of their works in relatively close proximity over a period of
several months. The most prominent of these took place during his first eight
months as Thomaskantor, when Sunday masses were dominated by the works
of Dresden-based composer Johann Gottfried Naumann, whose secular works
had long been a staple of the Gewandhauskonzerte. During this period, Schicht
performed a sequence of Naumann’s psalm cantatas, his cantata Zeit und
Ewigkeit (‘Time and Eternity’) and at least one of his mass settings. A similar
sequence took place with the works of Ignatz von Seyfried from late 1819 to
the middle of 1820, and on several occasions Schicht used the long stretches of
Sundays after Trinity for a more limited exploration of a composer’s œuvre.
Like his predecessors, Schicht performed a mixture of motets, cantatas and
masses during the Hauptgottesdienst. Masses had enjoyed a significant revival
since Hiller’s tenure, and cantatas (especially those based on psalms) comprised
the largest share of the repertoire. In the case of shorter works and masses, the
36 The diary begun in 1716 by Thomaskirche sexton Johann Christoph Rost attests
to the singing of two motets in vespers services preceding and sometimes during
feasts, and it notes the various logistics of when they were sung. Johann Christoph
Rost, ‘Nachricht, Wie es, in der Kirchen zu St. Thom: allhier, mit dem Gottesdienst,
Jährliches sowohl an Hohenfesten, als andern Tagen, pfleget gehalten zu Werden’,
Thomaskirche Archiv, uncatalogued manuscript, fols 1v, 23v–24r, 34r, 47r.
37 While Tageblatt listings from Schicht’s tenure do not specify the breaking of larger
works into two parts, listings of the same repertoire from the very beginning of
Weinlig’s cantorship do, indicating this had likely been common practice for quite
some time.
38 The practice may have started – in a limited way – during Müller’s tenure: for
instance, on Michaelmas 1804 [a Saturday], Müller performed the first half of
Friedrich Ludwig Kunzen’s new cantata, Das Halleluja der Schöpfung, at the
Nikolaikirche and the second half on the next day at the Thomaskirche. ‘Einige
Nachrichten über Kirchenmusik in Leipzig’, Berlinische musikalische Zeitung 1,
no. 7 (1805), p. 27.
39 See D-LEm, I B 4a–c.
40 As in the past, usually just the Kyrie and Gloria (the missa) would be performed,
but especially on regular Sundays one might hear only the Gloria (since the
German Kyrie was still standard), or even just a Sanctus and Benedictus and/or
Agnus Dei.
Haydn, Georg Joseph Vogler and Peter Winter, all of whom were very well
known to Gewandhaus audiences. But the masses dominating Leipzig church
performances – particularly in the first eight years of Schicht’s tenure – were
those of Joseph Haydn. Over the course of the first decade of the nineteenth
century, Leipzig publisher Breitkopf & Härtel released six of Haydn’s late masses,
all of which – in the aftermath of the excitement that had greeted performances
of his oratorios – soon became ubiquitous in Leipzig churches. By the end of the
1810s, the repertoire became more varied, with Haydn’s masses roughly tied with
Mozart’s in number of performances, no doubt due in part to the publication of
additional Mozart masses by Breitkopf in 1812 and 1822.
Schicht’s impact on the cantorate was immense and long-lived. Although
his most significant contribution was to make the service music more concert-
like, his substantial œuvre (which included numerous oratorios and cantatas,
and a vast number of motets) enjoyed regular performances decades after his
death, particularly during the vespers service. More significantly, he appears
to have been successful in bringing art-music consumers into the church. As a
correspondent for the Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung noted in 1812, ‘there is
always a very full, attentive auditorium for Saturday evening vespers (for example)
to hear the motets, for which Mr. Schicht likewise presents admirable works
from all the ages of musical culture.’41 While the author specifies the vespers
service here, his use of ‘for example’ suggests that the other services with music
were similarly well attended. There is additional evidence to suggest that the
Hauptgottesdienst at the Nikolaikirche was among these. For while, as noted
earlier, communion numbers citywide steadily declined between 1790 and 1810,
the Nikolaikirche actually saw a modest increase starting in the year Schicht
began his project. It began with an initial surge in 1810, when the number of
parishioners taking communion in the church rose from 5,952 in the previous
year to 7,138. The numbers drop for the next three years (as the war against
Napoleon heated up and Saxony – and Leipzig in particular – became a central
battlefield), but the gains became permanent once the war was over. Although
this increase was undoubtedly the consequence of a variety of factors, the timing
suggests that music was one of them. Perhaps more convincing, however, is
the parallel decline in the number of parishioners taking communion privately,
which dropped fairly steadily in the post-war years; this again demonstrates
that church attendance was on the rise, as well as suggests that something had
changed to spark the increase.42 That these trends affected the Nikolaikirche
and not the Thomaskirche makes sense, since St Nikolai was the city’s flagship
church, particularly since it had been transformed into a neoclassical showplace –
complete with a new organ – after a thirteen-year renovation project that ended
in 1797.43 It was where the first – and most elaborately celebrated – day of the
multi-day feasts of Christmas, Easter and Pentecost took place, as well as the
annual service in honour of the town council elections. All of these factors likely
combined to make the Nikolaikirche the preferred venue for those attending
services primarily for their musical content.
43 In his 1860 guide to the city, Carl Weidinger notes that the Nikolaikirche ‘has
always been where the large religious celebrations were held’. Carl Weidinger,
Leipzig: Ein Führer durch die Stadt und ihre Umgebungen (Leipzig: J. F. Weber,
1860), p. 132.
44 See, for instance, [Oswald Lorenz], ‘Nekrolog’, Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 16 (1842),
104; Carl Ferdinand Becker, ‘Nekrolog’, AMZ 44 (1842), pp. 210–11.
45 Weber, The Great Transformation of Musical Taste, pp. 169–72 and 182–3.
46 Sposato, ‘“ The Joyous Light of Day”’, p. 226.
In the absence of Mendelssohn’s lobbying and – to a lesser extent – a letter
of recommendation from Louis Spohr,47 Hauptmann would have seemed an
illogical choice to take over after Weinlig’s death on 7 March 1842. He was
competing against two other finalists for the position, Carl Friedrich Zöllner
and former Gewandhaus director Christian August Pohlenz,48 both of whom
had strong ties to the city and – at least judging by previous holders of the
office – were significantly more qualified. Zöllner’s reputation rested primarily
on the numerous male choral societies (Liedertafeln) he founded, and he was a
prolific composer of sacred music (much of which had been performed during
the Thomaskirche’s vesper services).49 Pohlenz had even stronger credentials,
having served as organist at both the Paulinerkirche (University Church) and
Thomaskirche, acted as interim cantor after first Schicht’s and then Weinlig’s
deaths, and directed a vast number of sacred music concerts at the Gewandhaus,
Singakademie and Paulinerkirche.50
No such qualifications could be claimed for Hauptmann, who was a complete
unknown as far as the music audiences in Leipzig were concerned. By 1842 he
had composed only a handful of sacred works, none of which had ever been
performed in Leipzig churches, nor had any of his music been programmed
at the Gewandhaus. (Most of his compositions to this point were chamber
works.) Moreover, his résumé demonstrated none of the supervisory experience
previously expected of a Thomaskantor: no work as choir director or ensemble
conductor, no experience as an instructor of groups of children, and no
administrative posts. While, as a teenager, he may have received some training
in sacred music composition under Dresden Kapellmeister Francesco Morlacchi,
the entirety of his career to date – with the exception of a five-year stint as
the court music instructor for the Russian prince Repnin – had been spent in
Spohr’s company, first as his pupil and then as a violinist in his court orchestra in
Cassel.51
It was during the Cassel years (1822–42) that Hauptmann became active as a
composer and, in particular, as a theorist, the field in which he was to have his
most lasting influence. He also took on students in both areas, but as late as just a
few days before Weinlig’s death, he expressed his lack of interest in teaching in a
letter to his close friend, baritone Franz Hauser: ‘I have often wished to be in the
position to say, like Mendelssohn and others do, that I don’t give lessons – I don’t
even have a pedagogical nature.’52 This disinterest turned to outright fear upon
his acceptance of the cantorship, as he revealed in his 5 August 1842 letter to
Hauser: ‘[I]n four weeks at the most I think that we will be sitting in the Thomas
School. Personally I can’t yet say that I’m really looking forward to it. […] I can’t
yet really imagine myself as a director.’ 53 His trepidation continued even after he
took up his post,54 which raises the question not only of why the town council
chose Hauptmann over his rivals, but also of why he applied for the position in
the first place.
One partial answer to both questions was Hauptmann’s intense interest in
and research on J. S. Bach. In the years just before accepting the Leipzig position,
Hauptmann had been in regular contact with Carl Böhme, director of Leipzig-
based music publishing firm C. F. Peters, which since 1801 had been assembling
an Oeuvres complets [sic] of Bach’s music. Hauptmann co-edited three volumes
of keyboard works that were published in 1840 and 1841 and simultaneously
wrote and published a study on Bach’s Art of Fugue (Erläuterungen zu Joh.
Sebastian Bach’s Kunst der Fuge).55 The potential for additional work of this
kind may, therefore, have helped draw Hauptmann to the city. But better access
to Bach materials and to his publisher were likely not enough to cause him to
take a teaching and directing position he was clearly dreading. Rather, it was, in
all likelihood, Mendelssohn, who both encouraged Hauptmann to apply for the
cantorship and heavily influenced the evaluation process.
Two of Mendelssohn’s close associates – Ferdinand Hiller and Wilhelm
Lampadius, both Leipzig residents in 1842 – were convinced that it was through
Mendelssohn’s machinations that Hauptmann was offered the position.56
(Hauptmann’s own godson, Alfred Richter, implies this as well, but grants equal
credit to Spohr, noting that his godfather ‘received a warm endorsement from
both [men] to become Thomaskantor, and was therefore chosen as Weinlig’s
successor’. )57 Indeed, Mendelssohn was involved in the selection process to
some degree from the beginning, as he himself was offered the job even before
Weinlig’s funeral. The offer, which came from the council through Leipzig city
advocate and Mendelssohn’s friend Heinrich Conrad Schleinitz, was immediately
declined, and Mendelssohn recommended Hauptmann for the cantorate in
his stead.58 But even before making his endorsement, Mendelssohn wrote to
Schleinitz of his concern that the position be ‘occupied by someone who is fully
worthy and [committed] to the well-being of the whole musical operation’.59
In referring to the ‘whole musical operation’, Mendelssohn was undoubtedly
referring not only to the training of the Thomasschule (St Thomas School)
students and their duties in the churches, but also to the annual series of concerts
they gave at the Thomaskirche and the choral works they performed at the
Gewandhaus. He was also likely thinking of his current project of establishing
a conservatory in the city, an idea that he first discussed with Schleinitz in 1837
and for which serious planning had been underway since 1840 at the latest.60
Unwilling to leave such a crucial hire to the businessmen on the town council,
Mendelssohn worked to steer them toward someone who was well known to
him, and who would gladly follow where he led, a description that fit Hauptmann
perfectly.61 Upon declining the offer of the cantorship, Mendelssohn may well
have contacted Hauptmann to suggest he apply for the position, a hypothesis
supported by Hauptmann’s sudden change of heart regarding teaching and his
application for the position.62 From that point forward, Mendelssohn kept close
tabs on the selection process and reported on the council’s leanings to their
mutual friend Emil Naumann in Bonn, who passed along the news to Hauptmann
(as was probably Mendelssohn’s intent).63
Despite his initial trepidation, Hauptmann succeeded brilliantly in Leipzig.
Two months after his installation on 12 September, Hauptmann reported to
Hauser that Mendelssohn told him ‘people were very well pleased with the
Thomas Choir, or, as he [Mendelssohn] put it, that the Choir was quite another
thing now’.64 A year later, all remained well, but his self-doubt continued to
linger.65 Nevertheless, he became the kind of multi-faceted musical citizen that
Mendelssohn hoped he would. He continued his research on Bach and even
worked with Mendelssohn to erect the first Bach memorial in 1843.66 That same
year he took on the editorship of the Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung and began
teaching composition and counterpoint at the new conservatory, which, thanks in
part to his immediate and intense work,67 was able to open for its first semester
on 2 April 1843.
Of course, beyond finding a colleague with whom he could work,
Mendelssohn was perhaps most interested in bringing to the cantorate someone
who shared his musical tastes and artistic views, so as to reform musical
programming at the church in a manner similar to that which he had already
achieved at the Gewandhaus. Indeed, Mendelssohn described Hauptmann as one
of those ‘few musicians with whom I so entirely agreed in matters of art as well as
all others’. 68
One point of agreement was Bach, but Mendelssohn doubtless also knew of
Hauptmann’s distaste for some of the more radical composers of the day and
the movement that would eventually coalesce into the so-called New German
School. Both men were highly critical of Hector Berlioz’s music,69 for instance,
with Hauptmann also expressing disdain for the whole of ‘the so-called Romantic
School, the main characteristic of which is, Absence of form, and therefore a
mere negation’. 70 With regard to sacred music, he seemed particularly sensitive
63 Letter of 2 July 1842 from Hauptmann to Hauser. Hauptmann also received reports
from other friends and acquaintances in Cassel and Leipzig, as he notes in his
letter of 7 June 1842 to Hauser. See Schöne, Briefe, vol. 1, pp. 313, 317–18.
64 Letter of 13 November 1842 from Hauptmann to Hauser, in Schöne and Hiller,
Letters, vol. 2, p. 3.
65 Letter of 3 October 1843 from Hauptmann to Hauser, in ibid., vol. 2, p. 9.
66 The depth of Hauptmann’s involvement with the project remains unclear, but
he did visit the sculptor with Mendelssohn on at least one occasion. Letter of 3
October 1843 from Hauptmann to Hauser, in ibid.
67 See his letter of 1 December 1842 to Spohr, in ibid., vol. 2, p. 193.
68 Letter of 17 January 1839 to Elizabeth Horsley, in Karl Mendelssohn-Bartholdy,
Goethe and Mendelssohn (1821–1831), trans. M. E. von Glehn (London: Macmillan,
1874), p. 117.
69 See R. Larry Todd, Mendelssohn: A Life in Music (New York: Oxford University
Press, 2003), pp. 237–9; also the letter of 14 December 1853 from Hauptmann to
Hauser, in Schöne and Hiller, Letters, vol. 2, p. 85.
70 Letter of 13 August 1844 from Hauptmann to Hauser, in ibid., vol. 2, p. 16.
to episodes where composers, in his view, lacked the appropriate restraint, as was
even the case with Beethoven in his Missa Solemnis (op. 123):
Speaking for myself, I abominate, in church music, all those quick
transitions from Allegro to più Allegro, Stringendo, and Presto, and I
abominate them most of all in great composers. […] Surely, Beethoven
was too much absorbed in himself to make a sacred composer, even in his
Masses.71
Both Mendelssohn’s and Hauptmann’s views suggest that they favoured the
building of a musical canon of masterworks – dating from the recent past back
to the Baroque – that would serve as a basis for musical programming. As
William Weber has noted, in Mendelssohn’s case, this meant working with the
Gewandhaus Directorium to move away from ‘miscellany’ concerts where the
goal was ‘balancing symphonic, operatic, and virtuosic pieces’ mostly by living
composers, to programmes in which the second half of the concert focused on
major (usually instrumental) works by deceased masters.72 Hauptmann, no doubt
following Mendelssohn’s lead, implemented a similar structure in church services,
except in his case the division was not between halves of a programme, but
between the vespers service and the Hauptgottesdienst.
As with the first half of a typical Gewandhaus concert at this time, the vespers
service continued to enjoy diverse programming, heavy with names that had
a history in the Leipzig vespers service but that would never find a place in the
canon (Rudolph Beyer, Ernst Friedrich Richter, Franz Otto, Julius Otto, Carl
Zöllner etc.).73 Hauptmann did add new names to the mix, but he had more
conservative tastes than previous cantors when it came to contemporary
music. Rather than choose from some of the latest works Leipzig publishers
had to offer, as Schicht commonly had done, he mostly added to the repertoire
late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century works that were written in a
Classicist style. This included pieces by former Thomanerchor member and
Schicht student Carl Gottlieb Reissiger (1798–1859), which enjoyed frequent
performances, as well as those of Mendelssohn and Spohr, which appeared
only occasionally on programmes. The same was true of Hauptmann, who
programmed his own works no more frequently than any of the minor masters
in the repertoire rotation. There was, however, a distinct surge in Renaissance
and Baroque music. Bach’s motets had been in the repertoire for more than
half a century, but Hauptmann brought Orlando di Lasso, Jacobus Handl (a.k.a.
Gallus), Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina, Giovanni Gabrieli and Alessandro
Scarlatti into the service on a regular basis as well. Although his primary
motivation was likely the same love of early music that attracted him to Bach,
he also found the works of these composers pedagogically useful for choir
training.74
While the vespers service continued (albeit with these relatively small repertoire
changes) along the same path established by Hauptmann’s predecessors, the music
for the Hauptgottesdienst underwent a significant transformation. Again, the
change was quite similar to that made in the second half of Gewandhaus concerts
under Mendelssohn, in that the repertoire emphasized composers destined to
enter the canon. While works by Mozart and Haydn had long been fixtures in the
Sunday service, these – along with those by Cherubini – now came to dominate
it, interspersed mostly with works by Beethoven, Handel, Naumann, Schneider,
Joseph Leopold Eybler, Friedrich Ernst Fesca, Johann Nepomuk Hummel and
Ernst Friedrich Richter. Once again, works by living composers, including
Mendelssohn and Hauptmann themselves, were performed relatively infrequently,
and even when they were, the focus continued to be on pieces written in a classical
or earlier style. Most of the works were psalm and psalm-like cantatas, along with
a large number of ‘Hymnen’, which now were often movements of larger works
re-tasked with new text (such as the individual movements of Beethoven’s Mass in
C). Masses continued to be performed, but only rarely on days other than the ones
on which Hauptmann knew they were expected, such as major feasts and Sundays
during the trade fairs.75 The music listings that continued to be published in the
Leipziger Tageblatt during Hauptmann’s tenure indicate that, for the most part,
the practice of serializing the performances of larger works over several weeks
ceased, perhaps in an effort to preserve the integrity of the repertoire. But as the
performances of the masses (and, as will be discussed below, of the Bach cantatas)
reveal, the works were, on occasion, judiciously pruned.
The most significant, enduring change Hauptmann made to the
Hauptgottesdienst repertoire was the reintegration of Bach’s cantatas and
masses into the service, from which they had been almost entirely absent since
his death in 1750. This began, very shortly after Hauptmann took his post, with
a performance of the cantata Du Hirte Israel (BWV 104) on New Year’s Day
1843, after which parishioners could count on hearing a cantata or one of the
so-called ‘Lutheran’ masses (BWV 233–236) every six to eight weeks. But how
complete any of these performances were remains an open question. In some
cases, the instruments Bach called for were no longer in regular use, requiring
Hauptmann either to update the works or to remove movements that called for
them; in others, the distribution of instruments did not match the orchestra he
had available. As a result, he wrote to Hauser, ‘One is forced to pick and choose
the numbers that are really practicable; to do them all would be hopeless’. 76
Hauptmann was also not concerned about performing these de tempore works
outside of their prescribed liturgical context, as the performance of Du Hirte
Israel – a cantata for the second Sunday after Easter – on New Year’s Day
demonstrates.
As we can see, the appointment of Hauptmann as Thomaskantor represented
a fundamental change in almost every aspect of Leipzig church music and in the
people who produced it. Although like his predecessors he was both a composer
and a teacher (albeit a reluctant one), it was his ability to function as a member of
a larger musical network that bridged church, concert hall and conservatory that
earned him his post. He was also chosen because Mendelssohn – and, perhaps,
the town council – wanted to see the same kind of repertoire changes that had
been made at the Gewandhaus implemented in the churches. More important,
Hauptmann represented the continuation and intensification of a process that
Schicht first set into motion, one that drove music consumers into the church
where they could find their concert-going tastes reflected. As a Gewandhaus
director himself, Schicht saw the potential of transforming church music into
something akin to a commodity that could be marketed to the same audience
that was enthusiastically consuming the programming of the city’s various
public concert venues. Although the idea of canon was not yet fully formed, he
gave church services Gewandhaus-like sophistication by programming some
of the same composers (and, on occasion, works) as in the Gewandhaus, as
well as presenting larger pieces in their entirety (albeit over the course of
multiple services). Weinlig continued Schicht’s practices in the churches, but
once Mendelssohn took the helm at the Gewandhaus, the two institutions fell
out of programming alignment, a situation Hauptmann was brought to Leipzig
to rectify. Like Mendelssohn, he refocused musical programming on works
of greater complexity and sophistication, as well as on composers who were, as
a result of the German historicist movement, becoming cultural icons and
were serving or would soon serve as the foundation of a musical canon that
continues to this day. Indeed, one need only look to modern-day Leipzig to see
the completion of the concertizing movement that Schicht and Hauptmann
began in the city churches: Saturday vesper services are advertised on placards in
front of the Thomaskirche, in printed promotional materials and on websites as
‘Motetten: Musik in Worten – Worte in Musik’ (‘Motets: Music in Words, Words
in Music’) with little if any mention of the liturgical content of the service itself
and a strong focus on the musical masterworks being performed.77 Thus, what
began as an attempt to expand the congregation by attracting music consumers
ended up with those consumers setting the agenda, one in which sacred services
began to resemble sacred concerts.
I n recent decades, the musical life of cities has received increasing attention
within musicology. As Tim Carter has pointed out, it is not surprising, given
the field’s history, that many studies of cities have focused on Italian centres in the
Renaissance, or that one of the prominent early exceptions to the predominance
of Italy, Reinhard Strohm’s study of Bruges, examined a city associated with
another foundational interest of the discipline, Franco-Flemish polyphony.1
Urban musicology, however, has broadened to include a variety of other cities,
prominent among them the great metropolitan centres of Vienna, Paris, London
and New York in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.2 Colonial cities,
too, particularly in Spanish and Portuguese America, have been the subject of
pathbreaking studies.3
There is one type of city, however, whose musical practices have so far
received little attention: settler colonial cities, that is to say, the myriad cities that
quickly grew from nothing, or from small and sleepy origins, to metropolitan
areas of sometimes remarkable size, across central and western North America,
Australia and New Zealand during the long nineteenth century. This is not, of
course, to suggest that the music history of all these cities remains unknown:
those that grew into major cities in their own right – Chicago and Los Angeles,
1 Tim Carter, ‘The Sound of Silence: Models for an Urban Musicology’, Urban
History 29, no. 1 (2002), 8–18, esp. pp. 9–15; Reinhard Strohm, Music in Late
Medieval Bruges (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).
2 Early work in this area includes Alice Hanson, Musical Life in Biedermeier Vienna
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), and Weber, Music and the Middle
Class. More recent studies include Simon McVeigh, Concert Life in London
from Mozart to Haydn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993); James H.
Johnson, Listening in Paris: A Cultural History (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1995); John Graziano, ed., European Music and Musicians in New York
City, 1840–1900 (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2006); and the ongoing
project on New York described in John Graziano, ‘Music in Gotham’, American
Music Review 39, no. 1 (2009), pp. 7 and 13; and Scott, Sounds of the Metropolis.
3 See Geoffrey Baker, Imposing Harmony: Music and Society in Colonial Cuzco
(Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008); Geoffrey Baker and Tess Knighton,
eds, Music and Urban Society in Colonial Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2011); and Cristina Magaldi, Music in Imperial Rio De Janeiro:
European Culture in a Tropical Milieu (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2004).
274
for instance – have attracted considerable musicological attention, and local
historians have provided records of many other locations.4 But in part because
historians and urban geographers have themselves only relatively recently begun
to recognize the settler colonial city as distinctive and in part, perhaps, because
of a reluctance to acknowledge that the American West, in particular, was
populated through a process of colonization, studies of the musical life of those
cities have been informed primarily by local and national perspectives. We have
not yet considered what the peculiar dynamics of urban development in settler
colonialism might have to do with musical practices that involved millions of city
dwellers worldwide by the time of World War I.5
There are good reasons to explore those issues, however. For one, the ‘instant’
nature of these cities – their extraordinarily rapid growth to sizes that in many
cases rivalled those of European cultural centres that had existed for centuries,
if not millennia – means that their cultural institutions too were newly created
rather than evolving from pre-existing local practices. As a result, they were often
the object of explicit attention, as civic leaders and promoters of the city sought
to create a culture that corresponded with their own ideals of urban modernity.
To be sure, these people did not always succeed; in musical activity as in many
other areas, the imagination and the ambition of city builders often outstripped
their accomplishments, at least in the short term (and in the case of settlements
that sought but never achieved metropolitan status, permanently). But whether
successful or not, those efforts reveal a great deal about ideologies of the urban in
relation to music.
One of the ideologies revealed most clearly is particularly relevant to the
relationship of music and commerce, for, in the settler colonial cities of the long
nineteenth century, the ideals of sacred harmony and the ritual practices that
established the ‘resounding city’ that Geoffrey Baker and Tess Knighton have
explored in earlier Spanish colonial cities are conspicuously absent.6 Rather, the
discourse around the new settler cities was unblushingly materialistic. Consider,
for example, this 1913 characterization of Denver and its surroundings:
The country tributary to Denver […] extends far beyond the state of
Colorado and practically embraces the whole of the territory West of the
Missouri River. […] In this vast region, every mine worked, every fresh
acre cultivated, every new orchard planted […] [a]nd every manufacturing
4 See, for instance, Derek Vaillant, Sounds of Reform: Progressivism and Music in
Chicago, 1873–1935 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003); and
Catherine Parsons Smith, Making Music in Los Angeles: Transforming the Popular
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007).
5 On the settler colonial city as a distinct type and its conflation with other types of
colonial cities, see Penelope Edmonds, Urbanizing Frontiers: Indigenous Peoples
and Settlers in 19th-Century Pacific Rim Cities (Vancouver: University of British
Columbia Press, 2010), esp. pp. 46–69.
6 See Baker, ‘The Resounding City’, and Knighton, ‘Music and Ritual in Urban
Spaces’, both in Music and Urban Society, pp. 1–20 and 21–42, respectively.
7 Thomas Tonge, All about Colorado [1913], cited in Carl Abbott, How Cities
Won the West: Four Centuries of Urban Change in Western North America
(Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2008), p. 74.
8 ‘The Province and People of Destiny’, in Charles W. Mathers [photographer],
Souvenir of the Alberta Inaugural Ceremony, Friday, September First, Nineteen
Hundred and Five (Edmonton: Edmonton Printing and Publishing Co., 1905),
copy in the Provincial Archives of Alberta, PAA 69.198/1b. Edmonton did indeed
become the province’s permanent capital, through a determined and ultimately
successful political campaign to defeat both plausible and unlikely rivals including
Calgary, Red Deer, Medicine Hat and Banff. See Alexander Bruce Kilpatrick, ‘A
Lesson in Boosterism: The Contest for the Alberta Capital, 1904–1906’, Urban
History Review / Revue d’histoire urbaine 8, no. 3 (1980), 47–109.
9 See, for instance, J. M. S. Careless, Frontier and Metropolis: Regions, Cities, and
Identities in Canada Before 1914 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989). For a
discussion of antecedents of this approach in the work of Harold Innis, see Graeme
H. Patterson, History and Communications: Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan, and
the Interpretation of History (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1990).
10 James Belich, Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise of the
Anglo World, 1783–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009). The literature
on settler colonialism is immense and growing rapidly; for a succinct theoretical
consideration of the phenomenon (as well as a bibliographic overview), see
Lorenzo Veracini, Settler Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview (Houndmills,
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
11 For other aspects of this issue in relation to Edmonton, see David Gramit, ‘What
Does a City Sound Like? The Musical Dynamics of a Colonial Settler City’,
Nineteenth-Century Music Review 11 (2014), 273–90, and Gramit, ‘Crossing
Borders, Establishing Boundaries: Images of the Violin and the Settlement of
Edmonton, Canada’, Grenzüberschreitungen: Musik im interdisziplinären Diskurs,
ed. Raymond Ammann, Federico Celestini and Lukas Christensen (Innsbruck:
Innsbruck University Press, 2014), pp. 209–24.
12 For the larger context of settlement in western Canada, see Doug Owram, The
Promise of Eden: The Canadian Expansionist Movement and the Idea of the West
(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1980).
13 Edmonton’s pattern of boom- and resource-driven growth would continue: after
three decades of stagnation or incremental growth, the city’s population doubled
between 1947 (118,541) and 1957 (238,353), after the discovery of oil in the area. In
2012, the population of Edmonton itself was 817,498, and, according to the 2011
Canadian census, the population of the Edmonton Census Metropolitan Area
was 1,159,869. See http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/
fogs-spg/Facts-cma-eng.cfm?LANG=Eng&GK=CMA&GC=835 [accessed 8 July
2014].
14 See Belich, Replenishing the Earth, pp. 200–6, on the ‘boom mentality’ and, for
a Canadian perspective, Alan F. J. Artibise, ‘Boosterism and the Development of
Prairie Cities, 1871–1913’, Town and City: Aspects of Western Canadian Urban
Development, ed. Alan F. J. Artibise (Regina, SK: Canadian Plains Research Center,
1981), pp. 209–35.
15 Edmonton Journal, Publicity Issue, 16 October 1911, p. 1.
Source: http://webdocs.edmonton.ca/InfraPlan/demographic/
Edmonton%20Population%20Historical.pdf [accessed 21 February 2014]
* In each of these years, one female music teacher also appears listed as a musician.
Sources: J. B. Spurr, ed., The Edmonton District Directory for the Year 1895,
http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/2234.html; Lowe’s Directory of the
Edmonton District, 1899, http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/2459.html;
Henderson’s Manitoba and Northwest Territories Gazetteer and Directory for 1905,
http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/848.13.html; Henderson’s Edmonton
City Directories [1908–20], http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/2962.html
[accessed 21 February 2014]
17 For a discussion of the history and structure of Canadian directories, see Library
and Archives Canada, ‘History of Directory Publishing’, http://www.bac-lac.
gc.ca/eng/discover/directories-collection/Pages/directories-collection-history-
publishing.aspx [accessed 21 August 2015].
18 Neither the dramatic growth nor the persistence of music teaching as a profession
was limited to Edmonton (nor was the large role played by women within it). For
a discussion of a similar development over the longer term in the metropolitan
culture that Edmontonians often emulated, see Ehrlich, The Music Profession in
Britain, esp. pp. 104–5 and Table I, ‘Musicians in England and Wales 1794–1951’,
p. 235.
19 In the absence of records of who was studying, the gender of music students
remains uncertain. It is worth noting, however, that at least one source suggests
considerable involvement by male students in classical music study: a 1910
photograph of Professor Charles Chisholm’s violin class at Edmonton’s Alberta
College shows seven male students and six female (Provincial Archives of Alberta,
photograph A11412).
reduced number of male musicians – often unmarried and living at their parents’
addresses – is probably the result of large numbers in active service (male
teachers were typically older and less likely to serve), men still edge out women,
and in other years after 1914, the ratio approaches three to two. The bust certainly
impacted Edmonton’s musicians, but it impacted women far more than men.
Together with the sudden ‘bubble’ in women musicians at the boom’s height
(1913–14), this decline suggests the possibility that women served as a kind of
auxiliary labour pool in music; always an appropriate accomplishment for women,
music could also become a source of income at the height of a boom, when an
abundance of opportunities drew men to more lucrative – or at least speculative –
opportunities. But in leaner times, it appears, women musicians, and even some
teachers, became expendable.20
All this took place within a city that was itself significantly imbalanced with
respect to gender. As Table 12.3 shows, like most frontier boomtowns, Edmonton
had a disproportionately large male population, a phenomenon related both to
the settlement’s high demand for heavy physical labour (an activity identified
in the nineteenth century in particular as masculine) and to the greater cost
of moving a family rather than an unmarried man to a frontier.21 Although the
disproportion reduced as the city developed and grew, it approached parity only
after the boom, just as numbers of women in music were declining. I will have
occasion below to return to the implications of the increasing presence of women
for the musical life of a growing commercial city; but for now suffice it to say that
these numbers helped ensure that with the exception of occasional ads for local
women teachers and the presence of female visiting artists (some of international
stature, like Emma Albani, who appeared to great fanfare in 1901 and 1906), the
public face of professional music in Edmonton was largely a masculine one.
As I will discuss below, the relationship of professional performing musicians
to what we would recognize as art music is complex, but for music teachers that
relationship seems clearer. Several of the city’s most respected music teachers –
including Vernon Barford, an English organist and choirmaster who arrived in
Edmonton in 1900, and William J. Hendra, a Welsh singer and choral director
who arrived in 1906 – were also connected with church music, and, as we will
see, church music and choral music were among the areas in which art music was
most solidly rooted.22 Numerous other teachers were associated with the Music
20 Again, Ehrlich’s study of Britain suggests that this was an example of a widespread
phenomenon; see his The Music Profession in Britain, pp. 156–61, on obstacles
facing women performers in England.
21 Joseph P. Ferrie points out the impact of family size on the cost (and therefore the
likelihood) of immigration; see his 1997 disussion ‘Migration to the Frontier in
Mid-Nineteenth Century America: A Re-Examination of Turner’s “Safety Valve”’,
faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~fe2r/papers/munich.pdf [accessed 10 July 2014],
p. 11.
22 After failing entrance exams at Oxford, Barford homesteaded in Saskatchewan,
became a music teacher, and served as organist and choir director at All Saints
Anglican Church (later Cathedral) from 1900 to 1956, while also maintaining
a teaching studio. See R. Dale Macintosh, ‘Vernon Barford’, The Canadian
* This number, from the federal government’s 1906 census of the prairie provinces,
is lower than that of the city’s enumeration from the same year (14,088; see Table
12.1).
Sources: based on a chart by Carl Betke, ‘The Original City of Edmonton: A
Derivative Prairie Urban Community’, The Canadian City: Essays in Urban and
Social History, ed. Gilbert A. Stelter and Alan F. J. Artibise, Carleton Library 132,
2nd edn (Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1984), p. 395; information for 1916
added from Census of Prairie Provinces. Population and Agriculture. Manitoba,
Saskatchewan, Alberta. 1916 (Ottawa: J. de L. Taché, 1918), p. 174.
The commercial model was in fact one of the only options in an environment
in which civic support for musical institutions was essentially non-existent. The
city did occasionally hire musicians on a fee-for-service basis, but even that
practice did not always provide the level of support that musicians hoped it might.
In 1912, the year in which the Orchestral Society was incorporated, city officials
had budgeted for summer band concerts in a city park. After the first concert, the
City Commissioners noted to Council that that concert ‘was greatly appreciated
by the public, judging from their attendance’, but also that
we are in receipt of a bill from the Citizens’ Band amounting to $96.00 for
that one, individual concert.
It appears that the musicians belong to a Union and that the weekly rates
are $2.00 per man, while the Sunday rate is $3.00 per man. The Sunday
concert would therefore appear to cost more than it should and more than
the appropriation will stand, unless the concerts are given every other
week.28
Council eventually adopted the recommendation to contain the expense of the
series by reducing the number of performances, partially frustrating this early
attempt at collective representation.
Summer band concerts might appear to have little relevance to the members
of an orchestra, but in the settlement-city environment, vying for business was
a constant activity, for musical ensembles as for other enterprises. An orchestra
could attract an audience during the autumn and winter, but, because the
Orchestral Society performed in the summer in its first years, it may have seen
the open-air concerts of the bands as competition. Weaver-Winston seems to
have hoped for a share of what had previously been given to the bands, so, on
14 June 1915, he proposed a mutually profitable arrangement to the Mayor and
Council:
Gentlemen,
We take this opportunity to make this application for Sunday Park
Concerts engagements on behalf of the Edmonton Orchestra, which as you
know has been giving Sunday night concerts in the Pantages Theatre.
We can furnish an orchestra of 25 men to play on Sunday afternoons for
the sum of $78.00 (Seventy-eight dollars).29 We beg to point out that the
remuneration for these concerts could easily be derived from the revenue
produced from the street railway system in fares to and from the park on
Sundays if there is an attraction there.
28 City of Edmonton Archives, RG 8.10, Box 1, File 13. The charter for what is now the
American Federation of Musicians Local 390 had been granted in 1907. According
to the calculator at measuringworth.com/ppowerus/, USD 3.00 in 1912 converts
to a value of $74.30; see n. 27 above, on the equivalence of U.S. and Canadian
currency at this time.
29 According to the Bank of Canada’s inflation calculator (www.bankofcanada.ca/
rates/related/inflation-calculator) $78.00 in 1915 is equivalent to $1608.59 in 2014,
or $64.34 per player, assuming the conductor was one of the twenty-five specified.
Inasmuch as, from present indications there will not be the number
of people leaving the city for the week end as there were last season, it
would seem that the parks would have an opportunity of drawing a greater
number of people than ever before.30
Council may have recalled its experience with the professional band and its
musicians’ union when it turned down this request, but it had no need to go
into financial or labour issues, because it could simply respond that it had
already made an arrangement with the newly founded Edmonton Newsboys
Band, founded by a local merchant to fight juvenile delinquency by providing a
wholesome recreational opportunity. That arrangement cost only fifty dollars per
week and had the further advantage of saving the band from going under – its
founder had written earlier stating that the ensemble would be disbanded without
some grant from the city. With one small expenditure, then, the city’s politicians
could save money, be seen to be supporting a popular ensemble with impeccable
ameliorist goals, maintain popular recreational events and, they hoped, enhance
streetcar revenue by providing an attraction that would draw an audience from
across the city. The only losers were Weaver-Winston and his orchestra, which
indeed ceased to operate shortly thereafter (the exact date of its disbanding is
unclear). During the boom, the orchestra’s proposal might well have succeeded,
but under newly straitened circumstances, new priorities applied. Nonetheless,
this example suggests some of the competitive and commercial realities of life in
the music business of a new city.
Active and well advertised as they and their services were, however,
musicians and teachers represented only a part of the music business. Music
stores, piano dealers, tuners and movers, and gramophone companies were
also well represented, meeting the growing needs of a domestic market, as
might be expected in a city in which real-estate development and building were
primary businesses. Indeed, by late in the first decade of the century, several
piano companies were engaged in highly competitive advertising, not only in
the Bulletin and the Journal, the two leading local newspapers, but also in the
French-language Courier de l’Ouest and the German Alberta Herold.31 As Table
12.4 demonstrates, the boom brought music businesses along with it, and the
music retail business was even more predominantly a masculine occupation
than was musical performance. And these numbers likely underrepresent those
involved in retail music, since a number of non-specialist stores also took part
in it (stationers selling music, and furniture dealers keyboard instruments
and gramophones, for instance), a practice that remained through much of the
century in department stores and mail-order firms. In this case, too, the bust,
Sources: J. B. Spurr, ed., The Edmonton District Directory for the Year 1895,
http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/2234.html; Lowe’s Directory of the
Edmonton District, 1899, http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/2459.html;
Henderson’s Manitoba and Northwest Territories Gazetteer and Directory for 1905,
http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/848.13.html; Henderson’s Edmonton
City Directories [1908–20], http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/bibliography/2962.html
[accessed 21 February 2014]
32 ‘Around the City’, EB, 4 February 1907, p. 3, and 7 February 1907, p. 3.
33 This version of the recurrent ad appeared in the EB, 7 January 1888, p. 1. The violin,
of course, was equally at home in art music, but the company it keeps in this ad
suggests rather its association with the fiddling that was the long-established basis
for dancing.
34 This is not to suggest that pianos and organs were unknown earlier. As Berg notes
(‘Music in Edmonton’, pp. 144–5), one settler had an organ as early as 1879, and the
EB reported that three pianos had been ‘imported’ in the summer of 1883. Local
business in those instruments, however, developed later.
in the social dancing context to suggest that their presence may have occasioned
the same ambivalent response that the article evidences concerning the physical
objects of that culture. It would not be long, however, before ambivalence could
give way to straightforward rejection; in July 1904, an ad for a ‘popular concert’
by the Apollo [dance] Orchestra, while noting that it would feature a ‘grand
gymnastic display’, ‘humorous monologues’ and ‘club swinging’, took care to note
that the dances the orchestra would play between numbers would include ‘no
square dances’. 38
Although these examples are drawn from the realm of popular entertainment,
recognizing the importance of such distinctions in helping establish ‘the
difference between what was and what is’ will also help us understand the
particular significance of art music in new cities like Edmonton. Precisely because
art music was so different from the informal practices of fur traders and settlers
(to say nothing of indigenous music), it could be all the more effective in creating
the atmosphere of a modern and civilized metropolis in the making rather
than a frontier trade outpost. Even if its economic role in the booming city was
limited, art music could effectively contribute a sense of activity, distinction and
cultural legitimacy. By such means, the city could indeed distance itself from
its rough and tumble past – and it could also distinguish itself from its rural
surroundings and compete with its rivals: initially, other local settlements that
might undermine Edmonton’s regional leadership, and eventually more distant
urban centres, especially Calgary.
Considering art music’s symbolic role brings us back to commerce, albeit to
music’s role as a countermeasure rather than as a contributor to it. As an editorial
noted on the occasion of the first Alberta Musical Festival, held in Edmonton in
1908, such an event could demonstrate that, despite appearances to the contrary
in the new city, commerce was not all:
The pioneers of a new country are necessarily concerned first in the
development of its resources, and the creations of the material conditions
of life. Nowhere is this primary duty more faithfully observed than in
Western Canada. But those who think the people of this country are
concerned with nothing but the business of making money are badly
mistaken. Amid the rush and whirl of rapid material development there is
still found time for attention to those means of culture without which no
degree of commercial success could redeem the people of a country from
poverty of spirit.
As an instance of this, the first Provincial musical festival ever held
in Canada is being conducted this week in the City of Edmonton. […]
It is intended that the event shall be made annual, thus establishing a
permanent incentive to Provincial musicians, and a permanent means for
the development of a taste for good music.
This is an event in which the people of the Province should take some
pride. It is another instance of Alberta leading the way, another expression
of the irrepressible Western spirit of advancement. […] It is the fashion
41 On women as patrons, see Ralph P. Locke and Cyrilla Barr, eds, Cultivating
Music in America: Women Patrons and Activists since 1860 (Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1997). I am grateful to Jennifer Messelink for suggesting the
parallel between the temperance movement and activities like the Ladies’ Musical
Club in her research into that organization.
42 See Weber, The Great Transformation of Musical Taste.
43 Barford’s memoir provides a useful overview of early productions. From the
1890s and 1900s, he recalled performances of Frederic Cowen’s The Rose Maiden,
William Sterndale Bennett’s The May Queen, Gounod’s The Redemption, Alfred
Gaul’s ‘not very impressive’ The Holy City, Haydn’s The Creation, Handel’s Samson
and Messiah, and Mendelssohn’s Elijah. He noted that, in addition to the inevitable
Gilbert and Sullivan, the Amateur Operatic Society produced Robert Planquette’s
Les cloches de Corneville (The Chimes of Normandy); see Barford, ‘Artistic
Achievements’, p. 15.
44 The programme announced for Sunday, 22 September 1912, is typical: March –
‘Coroebus’, Victor Boehnlien; Overture – ‘Semiramide’, Rossini; Song – ‘She Alone
Charmeth My Sadness’ (from The Queen of Sheba [La reine de Saba]), Gounod;
Selection – ‘Carmen’, Bizet; Cello Solo – ‘The Palms’ [‘Les Rameaux’], Faure [sic];
Waltz – ‘Sympathy’, Eduard Mezzacapo; Song – ‘Mountain Lovers’, William
Henry Squire; Selection – ‘Flirting Princess’, Joseph E. (‘Joe’) Howard; ‘God Save
the King’; see ‘Orchestral Society Concert’, EB, 21 September 1912 (Morning
Edition), p. 8. On the Alexandra Palace and its musical programming, see Paul
Watt and Alison Rabinovici, ‘Alexandra Palace: Music, Leisure, and the Cultivation
of “Higher Civilization” in the Late Nineteenth Century’, Music & Letters 95
(2014), 183–212. See especially Table 6 (pp. 198–200), which samples repertoire of
instrumental, vocal and promenade concerts.
45 Barford made clear that early cantata and oratorio performances were led by
local church musicians and that the Orchestral Society ‘had as its nucleus the
men who played in Pantages Theatre’. He also suggested that the professionals
participated in ‘serious’ projects for the sake of developing local music rather
than for profit: ‘The Musicians Association felt themselves bound to prohibit its
members from playing in these orchestras without receiving the regular union fee,
but it turned a completely blind eye to the fact, of which it was perfectly cognizant,
that its members who played in the festival orchestras, almost to a man, returned
their ‘pay cheques’ as subscriptions to the festival expenses’. Barford, ‘Artistic
Achievements’, p. 23.
46 See Gramit, ‘What Does a City Sound Like?’
47 The J. J. Walker collection at the Royal Alberta Museum in Edmonton preserves a
large collection of such imported music, largely American and British, collected by
Walker, a local theatre orchestra leader into the 1920s.
48 ‘Orchestral Concert’, EB (Morning Edition), 27 August 1912, p. 6.
Indeed, the discursive conflict was itself part of a developing urban identity.49
The absence of indigenous musics and of the practices associated with the
fur-trading past was a musical correlate of the spatial exclusion of native peoples
characteristic of settler colonial cities, and finding a new musical object for the
curiosity, fear and dismissal that had not long before characterized settlers’
responses to First Nations peoples supported the claim that this was indeed a new
and real city in a new land.50
49 For an exploration of the conflict in a more established city, see Robin Elliot,
‘Ragtime Spasm: Anxieties over the Rise of Popular Music in Toronto’, Post-
Colonial Distances: The Study of Popular Music in Canada and Australia, ed.
Beverley Diamond, Denis Crowdy and Daniel M. Downes (Newcastle: Cambridge
Scholars, 2008), pp. 67–90.
50 For a consideration of the representation of space in settler colonial cities, see
the essays collected in Making Settler Colonial Space: Perspectives on Race, Place
and Identity, ed. Tracey Banivanua Mar and Penelope Edmonds (Houndmills,
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
51 Lionel Kingsley, ‘Teachers’ Conditions in Western Canada’, MT, 1 May 1914,
pp. 309–10.
52 Ibid., 309.
Edmonton itself offered no better prospects, but Kingsley did provide a rare
outsider’s view of the musical results of the boom:
Edmonton, the capital of Alberta, is a fine city striding the hills, but music
is overdone here. The number of studios opened during the past year is
out of all proportion to the demand. No pianoforte teachers are required
for many a long day. There may be a little more opening for qualified vocal
teachers, for there are as many quacks, in proportion, ruining voices in
Canada as there are in the more sophisticated European musical centres.53
Kingsley’s conclusion – which, he maintained, only the founding of provincial
academies would alter – was gloomy: ‘So rule Canada at present out of practical
politics so far as it is of use to the surplus teachers of the Old World. It needs
agriculture – music culture [by which he appears to mean serious musical culture
as a whole, although teaching dominates the article] will come later’.54
From the perspective of the centre, then, Winnipeg and Edmonton were
essentially interchangeable as remote, uncivilized outposts. Because Winnipeg
often served as a model for what the newer city hoped to achieve, this equation of
the two cities might have offered some small comfort to Edmontonian musicians
who happened to read Kingsley’s article, but its thinly veiled mockery suggests
that the apparently inevitable emulation of the centre was doomed to failure,
since emulation itself set up the centre as the ultimate arbiter of success.
From the perspective of Edmonton’s promoters, of course, Kingsley had
it all wrong. Had he looked more closely, he would surely have noticed that
prosperity was bringing with it the developing musical activities and institutions
that signified ‘culture’ in the strong sense that both centre and periphery agreed
upon. He might also have recognized that the prominent role of women in those
developments was a civilizing corrective, balancing the earlier predominance of
labouring men, rather than a sinister conspiracy to disadvantage male teachers.
And above all, he might have seen how profit and culture could coexist to their
mutual benefit in a coming metropolis.
Neither Edmonton’s musicians, businessmen and boosters, however, nor
Kingsley, its metropolitan detractor, showed much awareness of a far larger
process of which the city’s nascent music businesses and institutions constituted
only a small part. Edmonton, after all, was only one of hundreds of booming
settlements across the Anglophone world in the nineteenth century, and its
boom not only occurred relatively late, but also was (the extravagant claims of
its boosters notwithstanding) relatively modest in scale. True, settlers were
quite conscious – and proud – of playing their parts in building nations and
empires, but historical distance allows us to see more clearly the results of their
efforts on a transnational scale. A list of cities developed through successive
waves of settler booms during the century preceding Edmonton’s moment of
growth provides a kind of checklist of the major metropolitan areas of central
and western North America and Australasia. Moving roughly from earliest to
53 Ibid., 400.
54 Ibid.
latest, it includes Cincinnati, New Orleans and Montreal (each beginning around
1815); St Louis, Toronto, St John (New Brunswick) and Sydney (from the mid-to-
late 1820s); Chicago, San Francisco, Melbourne and Adelaide (from the 1840s);
Denver, Minneapolis, Winnipeg, Vancouver and Brisbane (from the 1870s); and,
along with the prairie provinces of Canada at the turn of the century, Los Angeles,
Seattle and Perth.55
None of these cities, of course, developed precisely as Edmonton did, either
musically or otherwise. Many grew much larger, and each grew distinctively when
considered in detail; the timing of their booms in relation to new technologies
of communication and transportation, their proximity to or distance from other
centres, and the particular constitution of their settler population inflect each
local history uniquely. Pride in local achievement and national distinctiveness,
however, should not allow us to overlook the ubiquity of brass bands, opera
houses, conservatories, private music teachers by the tens of thousands, and
piano and gramophone dealers, who helped constitute these cities along
with other businesses while also furnishing a suitably optimistic and civilized
soundtrack for it – and, not incidentally, providing a century of booming business
for the instrument makers and music publishers whose products were shipped
to those thousands of peripheral and developing settlements. Musicologists are
accustomed to seeking out and prizing the unique, and the early music history of
Edmonton provides it as much as any other location, but the business of building
music in the new cities of the west(s) constitutes an enormous worldwide
phenomenon in which the imported and derivative played a role that, to its
practitioners, was very far from ordinary. We will fail to understand this process
until we acknowledge the value of the familiar – both aesthetic and commercial –
as they did.
55 This list is based on the table, ‘Boom, Bust and Export Rescue in the Anglo Wests,
1815–1913’, in Belich, Replenishing the Earth, pp. 88–9. My list gives only the
first boom for each city listed (many boomed twice, and some, like Toronto and
Chicago, three times) and omits South Africa and a few smaller urban centres.
Research for this chapter was supported by an Insight Grant from the Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
1 John Fred Jones, ‘Advertising in France’, Advertising and Selling 15 (1905), 659.
2 Cited in William F. Arens, Contemporary Advertising (Chicago: Irwin, 1996), p. xix.
3 The term ‘score’ is used here to refer to a musical composition in western musical
notation together with any performance instructions and indications as to its
producers (composer, librettist, performer, venue where performed and music
publisher).
297
of new ideas penetrating to the very depth of the most distant villages, in
an atmosphere hitherto unknown of intellectuality, eminently propitious to
national progress in every conceivable shape and form.4
In this essay, I examine the scores published in French magazines and
newspapers from the 1870s to the 1920s, their weekly supplements and their
annual albums for subscribers, as well as the choices and marketing strategies
underlying them. These scores provided broad access to the gamut of French
musical culture, from opera and operetta to piano pieces and popular song. But
when the frame is a newspaper or magazine, what does a score mean? How
is the medium part of the message? Musical scores in the press, like French
advertising, were a technology, a medium and a practice that, in addressing
specific needs, desires and objectives, created an exchange satisfying both
producers and consumers. As with other marketing tools, they served to identify
and differentiate a product; to stimulate interest, especially in music that was new,
previously unpublished [inédit], or reflective of intellectual or musical fashions; to
build commercial as well as cultural value; to reach a broad public and generate
future sales; and to lower publishers’ overall costs.5
To the extent that the French public respected its print media and trusted
its opinions, these scores had the potential to shape as well as reflect the
dynamic evolution of musical taste. This raises the question of agency. Who
was responsible for choosing the scores published in these print media and
what factors drove their decisions? It appears that music and theatre critics
were involved, but not always. In the case of Le Figaro, thanks to the critics’
transparency in such matters, we learn much more detail and come to appreciate
their desire to achieve balance among the competing options. And who benefited
from the scores’ publication? As part of other cultural offerings, scores made
newspapers and magazines appealing, a reason to subscribe, especially when,
in some cases, scores were provided only to subscribers. In addition, as a form
of ‘disguised publicity’, many drew attention to current events and premieres
on French and foreign stages, thereby providing visibility to the producers –
certain theatres, concert organizations, composers, performers and music
publishers.
Who read these scores is unclear; but their presence over the long term in a
wide variety of print media, for free or little cost, suggests that they appealed to
all classes. They helped people discover their preferences, as well as expand on
and stretch beyond them. However, we should not assume that these readers were
mere passive consumers. As most scores were either for voice, voice and piano, or
piano alone, sometimes accompanied by performance instructions, evidently they
were meant to be sung or played. From a commercial perspective, learning music
through performing it produces interest, and that, in turn, generates demand. In
presenting diverse levels of difficulty, these print media sought to reach those
of varied musical competencies. Performing music also calls on an engagement
4 Jones, ‘Advertising in France’, p. 659. This was the John Fred Jones & Co. with
offices in Paris, one of the largest advertising companies on the continent (p. 469).
5 Arens, Contemporary Advertising, pp. 34 and 197–210.
with it. Such scores offered not only an encounter with the new – so important
in fashionable Paris – but also a mode of instruction, of aspiration, and of social
distinction, as well as a conduit to self-esteem. In France, after the defeat by
Prussia, such experiences were crucial in the regeneration of the country.
Scores in the French press thus point to taste as performative. Through
them, both decision-makers in print media and their readers participated in
the production and circulation of taste, based on a willingness to embrace the
unknown. As Antoine Hennion has argued, ‘Taste is always reflexive. It is not
perceiving or feeling on the basis of what one knows, but discovering oneself as a
taster.’ 6 In this sense, these scores are an ideal barometer of French culture in flux.
An important observation emerges from this study. Throwing into question
Pierre Bourdieu’s theory about taste distinctions between the classes (as well
as American presumptions about the class implications in so-called ‘highbrow’
art music and ‘lowbrow’ popular music),7 this microcosm of the musical world
documents both musical tastes aligned with class and tastes promoted across
the classes, as if they were or could be widely shared. Throughout the Third
Republic, ensembles such as Jules Pasdeloup’s Concerts Populaires performed
the same Viennese classics and French contemporary music for the working
classes as other orchestras offered elites – a kind of ‘elevation’ with political
implications in French society.8 Remarkably in this study, even more fascinating
intersections emerge across a range of lower-class, literary and elite newspapers
in the 1890s. Contradicting Bourdieu’s assumptions (or at least his studies of
taste in contemporary France), in each of these papers featured we find an
overlap in the genres represented by their scores. Moreover, in general, the press
tended to ignore not only any presumed associations of genres with class, but
also distinctions between music addressed to professionals and that considered
appropriate for amateurs. Song was particularly powerful in this way, malleable
while deeply expressive of French values. Such intersecting interests not only
suggest that French identity at the time was less fractured than we have come to
believe, they also invite us to rethink what fuelled the renaissance in French music
during the Belle Époque.
of scores, but also the close interrelationship between these scores and musical
life, even abroad. For example, in August 1876, the magazine published a song
drawn from Wagner’s Die Walküre to accompany discussion of the first Ring
cycle in Bayreuth – its theatre, public, poem, music, orchestra, performance
and reception – which took up the entire issue. In 1877, with the Concerts
Colonne competing with the Concerts Populaires in performances of Berlioz’s
La Damnation de Faust, the Journal selected numerous Hungarian marches and
songs alongside Berlioz’s Marche hongroise. Drawing attention to the premiere
of Saint-Saëns’s Samson et Dalila in Weimar (1877), discussed on its first page, it
offered the ‘Danse des prêtresses’ and a Jewish hymn, signalling both the exotic
and the Biblical nature of the story. Le Journal de musique was also unique at the
time in the balance between scores and ‘weekly news’. Covered were not only the
major venues for art music, but also music competitions for professionals as well
as for working-class orphéons.13 This suggests that the magazine’s subscribers
came from a range of classes and backgrounds.
Scores were also offered by journals oriented specifically to music
professionals. For over a hundred years, the weekly Le Ménestrel (1833–1940),
published after 1840 by Jacques-Léopold Heugel and his descendants and closely
associated with their music publishing business, was the most important of these.
From the beginning through 1940, Le Ménestrel offered only to its subscribers
one or two scores per issue ‘of moderate difficulty’ and, in addition at the end
of the year, musical albums as annual ‘gifts’ – that is, deeply discounted or free
compilations of scores. Its choices often reflected Heugel’s publishing interests –
the composers it represented. To promote Delibes’s operas, Le Ménestrel
published fifteen excerpts of Jean de Nivelle in spring 1880 and seven of Kassya in
1893. For Massenet, it chose five excerpts from Thaïs in 1894, four from Sapho in
1897, seven from Cendrillon in 1899 and six from Grisélidis in 1901, in addition to
many of his songs every year. The range of music was very broad, with composers
spanning the political spectrum from the conservative d’Indy to the socialist
Charpentier. Nonetheless, Henri Heugel, editor from 1883 to 1916, had his
prejudices. Despite Wagner’s rising popularity and unlike Le Journal de musique,
Le Ménestrel published no excerpts from Wagner’s works during the last quarter
of the century.
That such scores allow us to track the nature and evolution of taste should
be no surprise. Yet, a close study of them breaks down assumptions about
French musical culture in fascinating ways. Although relatively absent in music
histories of the period, works by female composers appear often in such journals,
especially Le Ménestrel, suggesting that at least seven women had significant
careers.14 And, for those who think that it was d’Indy and the Schola Cantorum
that revived Rameau’s music after 1900, consider the inclusion of a minuet from
Rameau’s Castor et Pollux in Le Journal de musique in 1878, taken from the 1877
publication of Charles Lecocq’s arrangement for voice and piano and coinciding
with Théodore Lajarte’s reconstruction of the opera in 1878. Dijon, Rameau’s
birthplace, at first attempting to organize a centennial festival, finally produced
one in 1876. L’Illustration and other general-interest magazines reported on
this festival, attracting considerable national attention. Le Mélomane published
Rameau’s harpsichord piece ‘Le Tambourin’ that year and again in 1883.15 Before
Rameau’s music became a regular part of Parisian concerts in the 1880s and
1890s,16 it was thus known by musical amateurs as well as professionals. Perhaps
the popular reception of his music, as suggested in these magazines and concert
halls, together with the availability of these scores, helped convince the music
publisher Durand to commission a new edition of Rameau’s music in 1895.
Comparison of the genres published in amateur and professional music
journals, paradoxically, shows a good deal of overlap. Le Journal de musique
included marches and waltzes, polkas and mazurkas, even if many were by
composers of art music such as Schubert and Chopin.17 And Le Ménestrel
published not just opera excerpts and art songs, but also urban popular song
and other light fare. In 1870, it offered an album of music by a popular singer-
songwriter, the Chansons de Gustave Nadaud, among ‘gifts’ to its subscribers. In
fact, Heugel had first issued these songs in 1861 and represented other popular
composers as well. As publisher of the Viennese composer-conductor Philippe
Fahrbach, Heugel, in Le Ménestrel, issued two or three of his polkas almost every
year from 1875 to 1907, and of Léon Delafosse, a pianist-composer popular in
aristocratic salons, five selections in 1896. Musical scores in Le Ménestrel thus
reflected Heugel’s eclectic publishing activities, extending from establishment
composers like Émile Paladilhe and Massenet, members of the Académie des
Beaux-Arts, to Johann Strauss, Jean-Baptiste Arban and Nadaud.
Conversely, music in magazines marketed to amateurs often included not just
waltzes and polkas, but also the classics (Bach, Beethoven, Mendelssohn) and
contemporary music that challenged performers and audiences with its difficulty.
For example, excerpts from Berlioz’s La Damnation de Faust appeared in Le
Petit Piano in 1878 and La Musique des familles in 1889. And, like professional
music journals, Le Petit Piano commissioned and printed transcriptions of opera
fragments to coincide with stage premieres, such as in 1895 Augusta Holmès’s La
Montagne noire and Benjamin Godard’s La Vivandière, and in 1902 Leoncavallo’s
1892, one in 1893, three in 1894, one in 1895, two in 1897, one in 1900) and Cécile
Chaminade (1898).
15 Later La Musique populaire (25 January 1890) featured the composer’s face on its
cover.
16 See the list of Rameau performances in Parisian concerts before 1900 in Jann
Pasler, ‘Deconstructing d’Indy’, in her Writing through Music: Essays on Music,
Culture, and Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 101–39, at
p. 135.
17 In 1876–77, Le Journal de musique published seven marches, seven waltzes, five
mazurkas, four polkas and the Serbian national hymn, alongside music by Wagner
and Saint-Saëns.
18 With a circulation of almost 50,000 by 1899, from the beginning L’Illustration was
also among the highest-quality illustrated magazines produced in France and the
most popular among elites and the bourgeoisie.
19 Augusta Holmès’s scores were published in La Famille (27 December 1891) and
La Vie de famille (13 September 1891). To coincide with the production of her La
Montagne noire at the Opéra, L’Illustration (9 February 1895), like Le Petit Piano,
published an excerpt. An example of a compilation offered to families is L’Album
musical de la famille, advertised in La Famille in 1879.
20 ‘To amuse, to interest, and to instruct’ was the emblem of numerous family
magazines. See Jann Pasler, ‘Material Culture and Postmodern Positivism:
Rethinking the “Popular” in Late Nineteenth-Century French Music’, Writing
through Music, pp. 417–49, at pp. 423–4.
23 Of note, Holmès published mostly with Heugel and Grus; this ‘popular song’, ‘La
Princesse’, was first published by Durand in 1883.
24 From Les p’tites Michu, ‘Prière à Saint-Nicolas’ appeared in Le Petit Journal and a
minuet in Le Figaro, the latter part of the fashion for dances anciennes discussed
elsewhere in this essay.
25 Le Petit Journal, 8 November 1885. La Mascotte was an opéra-comique by Edmond
Audran.
seemingly reprinted the same exact score that had appeared in Le Figaro two
months earlier and, acknowledging no publisher, evidently without permission.
Perhaps, assuming there was little subscriber overlap, no one noticed. In any
case, scores subsequently disappeared from the paper. Still, using its cover
images for news, Le Journal du dimanche featured Nadaud when he died (1893)
and Massenet on the occasion of Cendrillon’s premiere (1899). If the editor was
assuming interest in such musicians among his petit-bourgeois readership, it was
not enough to merit a return to the inclusion of scores, perhaps because the paper
had no music critic to turn to for advice.
More important than Le Journal du dimanche as a ‘literary and political
journal’, L’Echo de Paris (1884–1938) was known for its lively and sometimes
scandalous writing addressed to the bourgeoisie. In 1891, it began producing a
four-page Sunday literary supplement, adding 5 centimes to the 10 centimes cost
of the newspaper and including musical scores. Focused specifically on things
Parisian, on page 3 it published multi-versed monophonic songs concerning
life in Paris. Most were from Montmartre and ranged from Xanrof ’s Chansons
modernes to Bruant’s songs. These songs were by the same musicians whose
pieces appeared in Le Petit Journal, but in L’Echo de Paris, charming illustrations,
inspired by the lyrics, surrounded the music.27 Simultaneously, throughout
1891, on page 4 the paper also published piano or piano-vocal scores by eminent
composers of art music, especially those with links to its theatre critic, the Jewish
writer Catulle Mendès. For Emmanuel Chabrier, whose music L’Echo de Paris
featured twice, Mendès had written the libretto of Gwendoline; with Augusta
Holmès, here represented by two songs, Mendès had fathered five children while
unmarried; Gabriel Pierné had written an Entre-acte for Mendès’s pantomime,
here published; and Alfred Bruneau had set to music Mendès’s libretto for
Penthésilée. When Bruneau’s Le Rêve was produced at the Opéra-Comique in
June 1891, L’Echo de Paris published on its cover an excerpt from the autograph
score as well as an unpublished fragment on its last page.
Of prime importance for Mendès was Wagner, on whom he wrote extensively
in L’Echo de Paris. Most likely Mendès chose the selections from French
translations of Der fliegende Holländer and Parsifal, the latter taking up its entire
last page, albeit without acknowledging any publisher. This coverage of Wagner
climaxed in September 1891 during the political controversy over the staging
of Lohengrin at the Paris Opéra. Besides Mendès’s two cover articles explaining
Wagner’s theories and music, the paper secured permission from Durand to
publish two fragments from Lohengrin. The eclectic juxtaposition of Montmartre
songs (on p. 3) with art music by Wagner or Wagnerians (on p. 4) suggests that
the paper’s readers were assumed to be open-minded, capable of seeing value
in both popular and serious genres. Was the paper sued for breaching copyright
on Parsifal? It is not clear. Only three more scores followed that autumn, then
an excerpt from Reyer’s Salammbô in February 1892. The supplement was
discontinued in 1893.28
27 The designs accompanying the scores on the page were unique to this newspaper.
28 Mendès later left to become theatre critic for Le Journal (1894–1909).
29 For a discussion of the ‘dance craze’ that coincided with the hope for a monarchist
restoration at the end of the 1880s, see Jann Pasler, Composing the Citizen: Music
as Public Utility in Third Republic France (Berkeley: University of California Press,
2009), chapters 9 and 11.
30 The four-page paper cost 15 centimes six days a week, but 20 centimes for a ‘double
issue’ of eight pages on Wednesdays, the days with musical scores. Beginning in
the late 1890s, the paper moved to six pages each day, for 15 centimes, including
Saturdays with the publication of musical scores, but at no additional cost.
31 Jones, ‘Advertising in France’, p. 661.
plunged from 80,000 to 20,000 for having supported Dreyfus,32 and the
conservative Gaston Calmette was hired to win them back.
Erratically in the 1860s and 1870s, but then continuously every week from
1879 to 1905, Le Figaro published one composition every Wednesday, shifting
to every Saturday after Magnard died and to the Sunday literary supplement
from December 1905 through 1923. From art and cabaret songs to piano-vocal
transcriptions of opera, operetta and vaudeville to marches, pantomimes
and beyond, these scores tell us much about the market for music among the
bourgeoisie and raise interesting questions about the interactions between
musical productivity, fashion and commerce. That they were printed on flimsy
newsprint presumably did not dissuade readers from playing them at the piano,
encouraged by their placement on the last page and by the increasing number of
performance instructions given. What scores in newspapers lacked because of
the short lifespan of newsprint, they made up in the choices they offered their
regular subscribers and their participation in the circulation of taste. None was
more important than Le Figaro in its use of scores to compose a precise, detailed
portrait of French musical taste and embody its flux and fashions over time.
Republicanism at Le Figaro:
Access, Egalitarianism, Diversity and Eclecticism
In the late 1860s and the early 1870s, musical scores appeared in Le Figaro only
occasionally and on any day of the week. The consistent ‘look’ of these musical
scores not only suggests that the newspaper typeset the music, which also seems
to have been the case at other papers, it also renders the scores easily comparable
over decades. Most were excerpts from theatrical works currently on stage, from
Hervé and Offenbach to Gounod and Delibes. Remarkable was the ‘Marche du
sacre’ from Gounod’s incidental music for Jules Barbier’s Jeanne d’Arc in 1873,
a dramatic score that, unusual in Le Figaro, took up the entire back page on 18
November 1873 with four pages of music in small print. By choosing the march,
here transcribed for piano, rather than one of the work’s tuneful songs about
the need for revenge against the invader, the editor savvily sidestepped heated
sentiment against Prussia after the French defeat as well as the conflict over
French identity that had erupted at performances. In 1878 and early 1879, as the
paper grew to eight pages on Wednesdays, scores appeared on average twice
a month, and the editor prioritized operetta, without ignoring oratorio (for
example, Massenet’s Marie-Magdaleine). In addition, occasionally the paper
made arrangements with publishers to offer its subscribers complete piano-vocal
scores at a discount, such as Aïda in 1878.33
32 Many have written on the Dreyfus Affair that divided France. See Pierre Miquel,
L’Affaire Dreyfus (Paris: PUF, 1959).
33 A note offering this discount was printed at the bottom of the ‘Prayer’ from Aïda
in Le Figaro, 21 August 1878.
34 Le Petit Journal included the Russian hymn in its 1897 Album for subscribers.
35 Jann Pasler, ‘The Utility of Musical Instruments in the Racial and Colonial Agendas
of Late Nineteenth-Century France’, JRMA 129 (2004), 24–76.
Journal, Le Figaro published Godard’s minuet from his Suite des danses anciennes
et modernes (1887), plus three more minuets in 1888.36 Certain choices suggest
that print media were also responding to one another. After Le Figaro published
Gaston Lemaire’s ‘sung-and-danced minuet’, ‘A Trianon’, with choreographic
instructions for a marquis and marquise, in 1894, and then Holmès’s ‘A Trianon’,
also about a marquise, in 1896, L’Illustration published Lemaire’s ‘pantomime-
melody’, ‘En dansant la gavotte’, in 1897. This was accompanied by not only dance
instructions, but also engravings of a dancing marquis and marquise (a.k.a. the
Opéra dancer, Cléo de Mérode) in period costume.37 In 1896, Le Petit Piano too
offered a ‘Menuet de la petite marquise’, this one by socialist composer Bruneau.
Such choices document how interest in such dances had spread beyond the
aristocracy and political conservatives. Other piano magazines also promoted
this taste: in 1902, Piano-Soleil published a series of contemporary dances ‘in the
old style’. Such works suggested that a modern French identity depended on a
relationship between old and new and that music offered a medium for finding
common ground.
As did other print media, Le Figaro contributed to the growing public taste
for urban popular songs. In 1882, it published two Nadaud songs and offered
two volumes of them as ‘gifts’ to subscribers. In 1893, when Nadaud died, and
in 1895, three weeks after one of his many songs appeared in Le Petit Journal, Le
Figaro again chose Nadaud songs. However, unlike similar publications in Le Petit
Journal and L’Echo de Paris, those in Le Figaro featured piano accompaniments,
suggesting that its readers had pianos and preferred accompanied songs. In 1893
and 1897, Le Figaro also published songs by the Montmartre songwriter Paul
Delmet: these ranged from early romances with which he earned his reputation
to those in his new Italianate, bravura style.38 The increasing presence of such
music in Le Figaro suggests that the bourgeoisie desired occasions to study and
perform urban popular song for themselves, just as the lower classes appreciated
and attended classical music concerts; indeed, some of the lower classes also sang
in choruses, such as the workers who took part in the Concerts Colonne’s initial
performances of Berlioz’s La Damnation de Faust in 1877. Le Figaro’s scores thus
should be understood as part of broader trends, some transcending class and
political differences.
36 Le Figaro also commissioned Widor to write a composition ‘in the old style’ in 1895.
37 L’Illustration, 9 November 1901, also published Debussy’s ‘Sarabande’.
38 ‘Notre page musicale’, Le Figaro, 18 September 1897.
especially in Paris. In keeping with its ideal of balance, Le Figaro chose not just
works at the major opera houses, but also those in popular venues. For example,
recalling Le Ménestrel’s practice, Le Figaro offered two or three excerpts each, not
just for the premieres of Gounod’s Le Tribut de Zamora (1878), Delibes’s Jean
de Nivelle (1880), Ambroise Thomas’s Françoise de Rimini (1882), Saint-Saëns’s
Henry VIII (1883), Massenet’s Manon (1884), Paladilhe’s Patrie (1886) and d’Indy’s
L’Étranger (1903), but also for those of Lecocq’s Le Petit Duc (1878) and Le Grand
Casimir (1879) and Planquette’s Le Chevalier Gaston (1879) and Rip van Winkle
(1882, in London). As in Le Journal du dimanche, the waltz from Grillet’s Le Roi
Dagobert (1891) advertised this ‘nautical pantomime’ at the Nouveau Cirque. An
excerpt from Grieg’s Peer Gynt was chosen to signal a Parisian production of
Ibsen’s play (1896). Usually, the first such publications came just before or after
the premiere, the second one months later when the work returned to the stage or,
in the case of Saint-Saëns’s Samson et Dalila, two years after its French premiere
in Rouen, on the occasion of its Opéra premiere (1892).
Le Figaro sometimes chose to highlight premieres at orchestral associations,
the Société des Grandes Auditions, and Opéra balls. Augusta Holmès’s Ode
triomphale (for 1,500 performers) appeared in September 1889, marking the
closing of Paris’s Exposition Universelle. In winter 1895/6, Le Figaro wished to
draw attention to a concert series at the Opéra with premieres of works by young
composers. The appeal for most audiences, however, might have been the old
dances, performed in period costume by Opéra dancers in the middle of each
programme. To capture this binary experience, Le Figaro published a piece by the
young Alfred Bachelet, followed by two dances by Rameau.
Each year the scores published in Le Figaro were also linked to premieres
beyond Paris – in Nice, Bordeaux, Marseilles, Béziers, Monte Carlo and Rouen –
cities that had theatres with significant seasons and in which Le Figaro probably
had many subscribers. This practice also allowed the paper to showcase women
composers, whose large works were more likely to be premiered outside Paris.
Scores pointed to Chaminade’s symphonic ballet Callirhoé in Marseilles (1888),
Vicomtesse Marie de Grandval’s opera Mazeppa in Bordeaux (1892) and Mme
Lucy de Montgomery’s Aréthuse in Monte Carlo (1894). Such announcements
alerted Parisian directors to works they might later want to produce. Le Figaro
also kept its eye on premieres abroad. Its scores signalled selections from
Massenet’s Werther in Vienna (1892) and his La Navarraise in London (1894),
Gounod’s Rédemption (1882), Chabrier’s Gwendoline (1886) and Reyer’s Sigurd
(1884), all in London, and Reyer’s Salammbô (1890) in Brussels. In 1890, the
paper featured a waltz from Tchaikovsky’s ballet La Belle au bois dormant
(The Sleeping Beauty), recently premiered in St Petersburg. The composer was
well known in Paris; his music had already appeared in Le Figaro in 1887, and
in 1888 its publication coincided with an entire concert devoted to his works.
Occasionally Le Figaro promoted works popular abroad by composers unknown
in France, such as J. Troubetzkoy’s ballet Pygmalion in Vienna (1881), Arthur
Goring Thomas’s Esmeralda at Covent Garden (1890) and songs by Brahms (1896,
a composer little known in France until that year).
Although choosing premieres meant selecting something from each work that
would best attract audiences, the excerpts from Samson et Dalila in 1890 and 1892
are remarkably different. The first, ‘Printemps qui commence’, presents Dalila,
loving, even naïve, as she begins to enact her charms, with no suggestion of her
manipulative nature. Love songs were important in any drama and such music,
neither exotic nor chromatic, would have appealed to traditional opera audiences.
However, in 1892, Le Figaro pursued a different strategy, one it had used in 1891
for Lohengrin’s Opéra premiere (four years after its Parisian premiere at the Eden-
Théâtre). In these cases, it chose excerpts that had long stood for the operas in
orchestral concerts: the March from Lohengrin and the ‘Danse des prêtresses’
from Samson et Dalila. Moreover, there were already innumerable transcriptions
of these floating around, such as the one (mentioned above) in Le Journal de
musique. The attraction, thus, was the allure not of the unknown, but of the
known, these scores serving as a kind of encouragement to go to hear such music,
for the first time, in the dramatic and acoustic contexts for which it was written.
For works whose subject or style might challenge listeners, Le Figaro sought to
present accessible as well as representative excerpts. From Messager’s comédie-
lyrique Madame Chrysanthème (1893), it chose a song that Pierre sings about his
native France. Whereas in his novel, Pierre Loti leaves his character’s birthplace
vague, the librettists Georges Hartmann and André Alexandre refer explicitly to
‘faraway Brittany’, perhaps because for many French of the time Brittany signified
the oldest part of the country and its racial origins, a counterpart to exotic Japan,
where the opera is set. For its first excerpt from d’Indy’s Fervaal (performed at the
Concerts de l’Opéra in 1895), Le Figaro chose a dynamic Celtic warrior song, also
alluding to French racial origins. However, when d’Indy’s work was first staged
in 1897 (in Brussels), the selection in Le Figaro was a ‘moderately slow’ song by
Fervaal’s lover, delicately chromatic but simple and hauntingly beautiful, most
likely chosen to be easily accessible to subscribers and perhaps in an attempt to
attract them to the work, otherwise known for its difficulty. The excerpt from
Pelléas et Mélisande in 1902 was unusual: the Act IV duet at the fountain shows
the innovative way Debussy expresses the love between the two main characters,
but it is hardly simple music and thus unlike many love songs used to attract
audiences to new operas. From sublimely lyrical to frenetically passionate, the
tempo always in flux, it translates the dynamic nature of Pelléas’s sentiment,
ending with Mélisande’s glance at him. By choosing such a fragment, Le Figaro
risked disconcerting its subscribers, but captured the essence of the opera.
Newsworthy about these scores were not just the performances to which
they pointed, but also other information printed on them. Beneath the title
were the genre and the venue, followed by the name of the excerpt and the
performer(s). Usually on either side of that information were the names of
the librettist, the composer and, if relevant, the arranger from whom Le Figaro
sometimes commissioned transcriptions. Through manipulation of font styles
and sizes, and the music’s placement on the page, the newspaper exerted great
control over the visual design, focusing the reader’s attention on one element
or another. Most important was what would catch the eye first. Gounod’s name
was usually centred and extraordinarily large, as were Saint-Saëns’s and Wagner’s.
When the young Bruneau won the Prix de Rome in 1881, Le Figaro printed his
name in large letters over an excerpt from his cantata, Geneviève. The name of
Marguerite Olagnier, librettist and composer of Le Saïs, also appeared in large
type, perhaps because this was the rare operatic work by a woman staged in Paris.
Famous librettists, Barbier and Michel Carré, or novelists like Zola and Loti, also
received special treatment. In contrast, to announce Mefistofele at Her Majesty’s
Opera in London in 1880, Le Figaro printed Boito’s name very tiny, albeit centred,
suggesting that the composer was little known in France.
Among many scores adhering to the paper’s typesetting norm were some
surprises. Although the press had predicted a scandal with Pelléas, Debussy’s
name was positioned to the side in a very small font size, the composer still
relatively unknown to the general public. Audran’s name appeared similarly on
the occasion of the premiere of his opéra-comique La Mascotte, which, though
among his first productions in Paris, was soon a major hit. Only in a few cases
was a singer’s name prominently emphasized. For a Widor scène-mélodie, large
and bold in the centre was printed, ‘sung by M. V. Maurel, from the Opéra’,
suggesting that it was Victor Maurel’s performance that rendered it newsworthy.
So too with Aïno Ackté’s performance of a Finnish popular song at the 1900 Paris
Exposition Universelle.
Because Le Figaro typeset its scores, the paper could also determine where and
how they appeared on the page and how much space the music occupied. At first,
scores appeared at the bottom of page 3, in 1867 below music and theatre news,
in 1869 below job ads. When, on 24 July 1878, the paper expanded from four to
eight pages on Wednesdays, scores moved to the back page where they remained.
This was convenient because the newspaper could then be folded in half, allowing
for the music’s display and playing at the piano. In 1881, thirty four-page scores,
taking up the entire page, outnumbered seventeen two-page scores, the latter
placed over stock-market returns. However, beginning in 1891, increasingly Le
Figaro placed two compositions in this space, and after November 1898, because
they had to share the back page with the financial market, longer scores began
to be printed with much smaller note sizes. For example, in the space of a Henri
Duparc song had to be squeezed Léopold Wenzel’s march for Queen Victoria
(fourteen staves with eight measures per stave), Messager’s sung-waltz (twelve
staves of fifteen measures each) and Vidal’s pantomime (eighteen staves with up
to nine measures each). To show a coherent excerpt of Pelléas, the newspaper
squeezed in forty-four measures, brimming with sixteenth notes, very difficult
to read. In 1907, Le Figaro wanted to publish the ‘Danse des sept voiles’ from
Strauss’s Salomé, but it had the space for only a single theme and apologized that
the piano could give only an ‘incomplete idea’ of the sumptuous orchestration.39
With only a half-page available for scores and as lyrical works no longer consisted
of distinct ‘numbers’, the problem of selecting an excerpt for Le Figaro became
increasingly complicated and the size of the notes and staves varied widely. This
compromised their utility in home performances.
Beginning in 1903, scores appeared erratically in Le Figaro until 2 December
1905, when they moved to the paper’s four-page Sunday literary supplement and
thereafter appeared regularly again. To mark the occasion, Le Figaro featured a
‘new piece for piano by Debussy’, this description printed above and larger than
its title, Hommage à Rameau. Such treatment attested to not only Debussy’s
growing importance, but also his capacity to bring together the old and the new.
Taking up the whole last page, but with only ten staves of three measures each,
was a luxury, indicating the paper’s respect for him. Other scores before World
War I, excepting the ever-popular ‘Good-Friday’ scene from Parsifal in 1914,
shared the last page with stock-market returns, raising their visibility for the
financially oriented. Le Figaro thus handled such ‘disguised publicity’, especially
for premieres, with as much care in the choice of musical selections as with their
visual presentation, directing readers to what was most newsworthy or would
have the most appeal.
were submitted by their publishers in advance of publication, such as, in 1897, those
by Rameau, Chaminade, Delafosse, Gounod, Fauré and Saint-Saëns. Others that
year by Lecocq, Charpentier, Pauline Viardot and Mme Mélan-Guéroult, however,
indicate no publisher, which suggests that Le Figaro was their sole publisher. The
newspaper also commissioned music, so indicated on the scores.
Protecting publishers’ rights abroad was particularly difficult. Intellectual
property laws varied from country to country. In France, publishers sometimes
explicitly granted Le Figaro ‘authorization’ to reproduce their scores, but less
so before the 1890s. Thereafter, the American Copyright Law of 1891 relative
to the reproduction of foreign works in the United States had repercussions in
France. In 1895, Heugel added ‘the only publisher, owner for all countries’ to
their ‘authorization’ of a song in Le Petit Journal by the famous opera singer
Jean-Baptiste Faure.41 Then, in 1897, Enoch became the first in Le Figaro to claim
‘copyright’ explicitly, although only on its newest publications. The first use of
‘copyright’ on a score in Le Figaro is in tiny italics at the bottom of a Delmet song,
‘Copyright 1897 by Enoch et Cie’, on 29 May 1897 (Fig. 13.1). It comes again on 27
July on a posthumous fragment from Chabrier’s Briséis, ‘Copyright par Enoch
et Cie 1897’, whereas Chabrier scores appearing later that year come only with
‘authorization to reprint’. The copyright indication returns on another Delmet
song on 18 September 1897, suggesting that illegal copying of French music
abroad was a risk most associated with popular genres.
The use of copyright on scores soon included salon music. On 6 November
1897, Enoch added ‘copyright’ to a new piano work by Moritz Moszkowski and in
1902 to one of his piano nocturnes, as well as to songs by Charles Cuvillier, Berger
and Chaminade, while Grus did so for a Holmès melody.42 In 1903, Durand added
‘copyright’ to both a Saint-Saëns melody and Debussy’s Arabesque. However, the
practice was still rare. The scores for four works that won prizes in Le Figaro’s
composition competition, published in the newspaper in 1902/3, indicated merely
that they were the ‘exclusive property’ of either Durand or Enoch. Perhaps, as
school exercises, they did not risk being imported abroad and there published
without paying rights. In 1904, only four works were copyrighted in Le Figaro,
three by Enoch (with a song by Chaminade indicated in English, ‘Enoch and
Co’, perhaps because her music was already known in the United States) and
one by Durand. But this began to change. After Wadia Sabra Effendi claimed
the copyright on the Turkish national anthem that Le Figaro published on 24
July 1909, both Enoch and Durand stepped up their use of the term on scores
in Le Figaro. By 1910, Durand copyrighted every work by Saint-Saëns, Debussy
and Ravel that Le Figaro published, in 1914 Maurice Delage’s Quatre poèmes
hindous and in 1922 Milhaud’s songs. By 1913, Choudens and Eschig did likewise
for their composers. This use of the word ‘copyright’, applicable to laws in the
United States and inevitably in English, suggests that Le Figaro was increasingly
Figure 13.1 ‘Qu’avez-vous fait?’, words by Georges Rozet and music by Paul Delmet, Le Figaro, 29
May 1897 [Courtesy of Bibliothèque Nationale de France]. This was the first use of ‘copyright’ on a
score in Le Figaro.
read abroad and that the paper sought to protect the scores it published in the
international arena.
Who’s in Charge?
Musical Scores as Instruction and Entertainment
It remains to discuss who made these choices and how Le Figaro expected
subscribers and other readers to understand and use the scores. The decisions
required someone who knew the musical world intimately, could deal with
publishers and had the capacity to make informed judgments. I suspect that in
the 1880s it was the paper’s music critic, Charles Darcours [Charles Réty], whom
Reyer thought ‘had sound judgment and knew well what he was talking about’. 43
Unlike in the contexts discussed above, when it is not clear who decided which
scores to reproduce and why, Darcours often explained within his music reviews
why certain scores were chosen for inclusion on that date, who published them,
and where to hear them performed. He comes across as concerned about his
readers and shows genuine enthusiasm for contemporary music. His tastes were
remarkably broad, which sometimes led to quirky choices. For example, after
selecting an excerpt from Georges Jacobi’s Black-Crook, a new version of the
first American musical in London (1882), he published four more Jacobi works,
between 1887 and 1892.
Darcours was especially interested in ‘encouraging’ young musicians and
women.44 During summers, beginning in 1879, when there were no important
premieres to publicize, Le Figaro published music specifically written each year
for female and male pianists to sight-read in their Paris Conservatoire exams, a
tradition continuing well into the twentieth century. These scores gave readers a
chance to compare the standards used to judge the two sexes. Contrasts between
the exercises suggest that some composers believed in gender differences, such
as strength and expressive flexibility in male pianists, dexterity and gracefulness
in female pianists – and wished to test them. The competition was also a
fashionable public event attended by over a thousand people, all listening to
from twenty to over forty performances of these sight-reading exercises and the
competition pieces.45 Le Figaro made these scores available for subscribers to
play at leisure in their homes. Table 13.1 shows the wide range of composers who
wrote for these competitions from 1879 to 1914, mostly Conservatoire professors
until 1898, with two surprises. Ravel, who is otherwise assumed to have rejected
the institution that never awarded him the Prix de Rome, composed the exercise
for male pianists in 1913, and Nadia Boulanger, only a second-prize winner there
and someone who made her career elsewhere, composed the one for female
pianists in 1914.46
47 See Magnard’s ‘Invocation’ from his Pièces pour piano (Choudens), published in Le
Figaro (8 July 1891), and the excerpt from his Yolanda, premiered in Brussels, in Le
Figaro, 11 January 1893.
48 Citations in this paragraph come from Figaro musical 1, 1 October 1891, p. 1.
49 In organization and repertoire, Figaro musical was succeeded by the monthly
Album musical (1903–13), published by La Vie musicale. It too juxtaposed early
music, contemporary music and Montmartre songs, printing 40,000 copies
annually.
50 Lara’s only major article on music in Le Figaro was ‘Le Cinquantenaire du premier
concert de M. Saint-Saëns’ on 2 June 1896.
Conclusions
Scores in the French press offer an important new context for studying the
circulation and performance of musical taste. These magazines and papers
published an extremely diverse and ever-changing selection, representing the
widest possible range of tastes. Whether oriented to elites or workers, writers or
housewives, as part of republican France they aimed to provide as many reader-
subscribers as possible with multiple avenues for expanding their knowledge of
current trends and engagement with music. They also used scores to support
various commercial interests, such as attracting a public to premieres of new
works. The scores’ visual design and layout, important aspects of their ‘disguised
publicity’, focused readers’ attention on something the periodical felt was
particularly important or thought readers might recognize – a famous composer
or poet, a star singer, or a prestigious venue. By selecting accessible as well as
representative excerpts from major works, especially by composers perceived to
write difficult music, the magazines and papers both supported producers’ need
for audiences and respected readers’ desire to perform and judge the music for
themselves. At times, these scores drew attention to current events, supplements
to the news reporting. Some publications, such as Le Journal de musique and Le
Figaro, offered examples of a kind of ‘trickle-up’ cultural action in the sense that
by providing their readers with direct access to a sample of the music premiered
in the provinces and abroad, they helped put pressure on prestigious Parisian
institutions, such as the Opéra, to produce such works.
Perhaps most of all, these newspapers and magazines and those responsible for
choosing these scores agreed that everyone deserved access to music, music of
all kinds. As this study shows, these scores document how the popular, literary
and elite press all refused to accept narrow definitions of their readers and what
musical genres they might enjoy. Their scores called on broad participation
in French culture – empowerment and self-expression through musical
performance for amateurs as well as professionals from all classes. They suggested
that musical taste is a site for both the exploration and articulation of individual
identity, as well as the expression of shared values, without collapsing one domain
onto the other. In this context, music was an art enhancing one’s leisure time, as
well as a medium for contemplating contemporary society and bridging class
distinctions. As such, these scores present a stunning rebuttal to the notion that
tastes are fixed and determined by class or even by musical competency. If taste
is a form of knowledge and power, then musical scores in the French press of
the time suggest that we revisit what this may mean. In such a context, taste as
performed is so richly diverse and dynamic.
From a musical perspective, these scores arguably also contributed to the
renaissance in French music during the Belle Époque, ‘sowing the germs for new
ideas’ in spreading the taste for four modes of musical progress.52 First, just as
national hymns in magazines and newspapers directed attention to international
politics, foreign music helped the French encounter and reflect on the distinction
of other cultures. Many French, especially republicans, saw themselves as
descendants of the Latins with a similar capacity for assimilation. Thus, not only
did exposure to foreign difference whet their curiosity, it also encouraged them to
imagine what could be borrowed in the spirit of progress as boundless expansion.
To the extent that these scores presented unusual scales, harmonies and rhythms,
they also helped prepare the public for French musicians’ new approaches
to music. Expanding beyond conventional tonality, their adventurous use of
harmonies and musical modes other than major and minor came to characterize
much French music of the time.
Second, the frequent juxtaposition of ‘ancien’ and ‘moderne’ in music
magazines as well as concert halls at the turn of the century suggests that many
French of the time also embraced spiral notions of progress: to move forward,
they needed to build on their past. Beginning in the late 1880s, widespread
interest in Ancien Régime dances led to the fashion for old dances ‘in modern
clothes’. 53 Through such dances, the French came to understand the dual nature
of Frenchness and music as a medium for finding common ground between the
old and the new. Not surprisingly, composers from Saint-Saëns and Fauré to
Debussy and Ravel took on this dichotomy, not only reinvigorating old dances
52 See Pasler, Composing the Citizen, esp. chapter 4, and Pasler, ‘Paris: Conflicting
Notions of Progress’, The Late Romantic Era: From the Mid-19th Century to
World War I, ed. Jim Samson, Man and Music 7 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991),
pp. 389–416.
53 Pasler, Composing the Citizen, esp. pp. 498–507.
with new harmonies, but also rethinking the foundations of French music. That
such currents permeated papers as different as Le Petit Journal, L’Echo de Paris,
Le Figaro and Le Gaulois is a testament to how deeply they informed French
society.
Third, in the same way that art music became increasingly available to workers
and the petite bourgeoisie, occasionally in their newspapers, enjoyment of urban
popular song spread to bourgeois and aristocratic elites and their papers. Both
genres crossed old class boundaries. Nadaud, despite his political songs being
forbidden under the Second Empire, and Gounod, despite his ultra-Catholicism
being less appropriate under the secular Third Republic, both enjoyed wide
recognition in the popular and elite press when they died in 1893. Reading across
a variety of print media thus draws attention to the taste for serious and popular
music across classes and political orientations, and encourages us to examine the
implications over time. For example, the coexistence of urban popular songs and
art music in many print media from the 1870s through the 1890s prepared the
way for the successes of Charpentier’s operas set in Montmartre – Louise and
Julien, ou La vie du poète. To the extent that the young avant-garde enjoyed urban
popular song, it may have also influenced the witty humour and ironic style of
Ravel’s song cycle Histoires naturelles.
Finally, these scores reflect the musical world’s openness to women, far more
than we might have imagined given their absence in music histories. Scores
published in these print media draw attention to women’s productivity, the
diversity of their output, and their active careers. The vocal and piano-vocal
genres so popular in the press also suggest that amateur female singers and
pianists may have helped drive the demand for music in newspapers. No one
understood this market better than Augusta Holmès, who not only composed,
and enjoyed public performances of, opera and large orchestral works, but also
wrote accessible salon music and even unaccompanied popular songs, reaching
the broadest possible public through every magazine and newspaper here
examined.
Musical scores in newspapers and magazines thus encourage us to expand
our definition of the musical press, its contributions to musical life, and its role
in French culture. Their remarkable longevity – over forty years in Le Figaro
and over one hundred in Le Ménestrel – is a testament to not only their utility
for their publishers, but also their ongoing meaning for reader-subscribers. As
emblems of taste, these scores shed light on French values, the continuity of
certain preoccupations, as well as the dynamism and complexity of French
identity during the Belle Époque.
327
Cherubini, Luigi, 258, 264, 272 Concerts Spirituels (Leipzig), 250–1, 258–9
Chévillard, Camille, 321 Concone, Giuseppe, 33
Chicago, musical life in, 274–5, 296 conductors
Chicago Inter Ocean, 208, 211–12 British, self-promotion of, 130–49
Chicago Tribune, 222 British marketplace for, 133–4
Chicago World’s Fair of 1933, 221–2 changing notion of, 11–12
Chickering & Sons, 213 ‘entrepreneur’, 132
Chisholm, Charles, 281n19 ‘portfolio’, 131–3
Chopin, Frédéric promotional photographs of, 145
‘Marche funèbre’, 27 see also specific names
music published in French magazines, Coolidge, Calvin, 220
300 Cooper, Victoria, 90
choral societies and music, British, 61–2, Copyright Act of 1842, 63
63–4, 72–3, 74–7, 81–2 copyright laws
Chorley, Henry, 98n36, 144, 244n109 in France, 317–18, 319, 320
Choudens firm, 305–6, 317, 318 in Great Britain, 63, 69, 72–3, 77–8,
Christensen, Thomas, 5, 18, 19 230n31
Cincinnati, Ohio, 296 international, 231
Clarétie, Jules, 308 in Italy, 42, 230n31
Classical Weekly, 216
Corder, Frederick, 178
Clayton, Henry, 78
Costa, Michael, 131, 134, 135, 233
Clementi, Muzio, keyboard music, 303
Costeley, Guillaume, 308
Clench, Nora, 185
costumes, newspaper and sheet-music
Cocteau, Jean, Antigone, 221
reproductions of, 39, 50–1, 51, 54–6
Cohen, Jules, 321
Covent Garden Theatre (London), 242,
Colbran, Isabella, 24
245n120
Coleridge-Taylor, Samuel, 68n23, 71
Cowen, Sir Frederic H.
College of the Holy Cross (Worcester,
‘The Better Land’, 81, 147
MA), 219–20, 220
as composer, 132
College of Violinists, 187–8
controversies, 138, 145, 147, 148, 149
Collins, Laura Sedgwick, incidental music
for Sophocles’s Electra, 207 Coronation March, 71
Colombo, Fausto, 46, 56 knighthood of, 144–5
Colorado College, 214 life of, 136–9
‘Comin Through the Rye’, 103n45, 110n67, Music as She is Wrote, 143
112 as musical scholar, 132, 142–3
commodification of music Musical Times obituary, 138–9
artistic quality and, 3–4, 40, 79, 115–16 My Art and My Friends, 147–8
avenues for, 6–7 network of associations, 142–3
instrument status, 153 Pauline, 137n23
masking of, 114–29 portfolio career of, 131–2, 149
music as activity vs. as object, 169–77 private life, 144
player pianos and, 153n4 promotional photographs of, 145
studies on, 2–6, 80–1 The Rose Maiden, 292n43
taboos on discussion of, 79–80 self-promotion as conductor, 10, 12, 130
see also specific genres and topics Symphony No. 3 ‘Scandinavian’, 137
communication improvements, 2, 5–6 Cramer, Beale, & Co., 69n27, 88, 89,
Concerts Colonne (Paris), 301, 313 91–2n24, 103, 105
Concerts de l’Opéra (Paris), 315 Crimean War, 35
Concerts Populaires (Paris), 299, 300n10, Crusius, Otto, 208
301 Crystal Palace (London), 134, 135
Dudley, Earl of, 142 Edmonton Ladies’ Musical Club, 291, 292
Dudovich, Marcello, 46 Edmonton Newsboys Band, 286
Duluth News-Tribune, 214 Edmonton Orchestral Society, 284–6, 291,
Duncan, Augustus, 217 292, 293–4
Duncan, Isadora, 217 Edward VII, King of England, 112n73
Duncan, Raymond, 217 Edwards, Frederick George, 146–7
Duparc, Henri, 316 Edwards, Henry Sutherland, The Prima
Dupont, Pierre, 306 Donna, 86
Durand, Juliette, 300 Egyptomania, 237
Durand firm, 305, 317, 318 Ehrlich, Cyril, 7–8n20, 80, 181
Dvořák, Antonín, 312 The Piano, 169, 176n76
symphonies published by Novello, 70 Elgar, Sir Edward, 67, 145, 149, 156
earnings, 68n23, 71
E. & A. Department Stores (Naples), 45n16 Enigma Variations, 71
early-music revival, 196n83, 312, 314, 322, Serenade for Strings, 189
324 Ellis, Katharine, 125
Eberwein, Carl, Nachruf von Weimar, Elvey, George, 141
31n53 Emerson, N. W., ‘Pianos, Organs and
L’ Echo de Paris, 307–8, 313, 325 Player Pianos’, 161, 171, 175
Edmonton (Alberta), Canada Emporium (graphic arts magazine), 58n50
Alberta College Music Department, Engen, Rodney K., 87
282–3 English Journal, 219
boosterism of, 275–6, 278 ‘Englished’ versions of operas, 13–14,
brass bands in, 283, 284, 296 99n40, 102n43, 223, 225–6, 227, 246
church musicians in, 284 Enoch firm, 317, 318
dance orchestras in, 284 envelope seals, 39, 47, 53–4, 54
gender distinctions of musicians and equestrian productions, 226
music teachers, 281–2 Ernst, Heinrich, 141
music as business in, 284–8 Eschig firm, 318
music conservatories in, 284 Escudier, Léon, 232, 233, 235n53
musical instrument sales, 288 Esposizione Artistica di Reclame (Genoa,
musical life in turn-of-the-century, 1899), 59n51
14–15, 278–96 Esposizione Internazionale di Cartoline
music-business workers in, 287t (Venice, 1899), 52
musicians and music teachers listed in Esposizioni Riunite (Milan, 1894), 59n51
city directories, 279–82, 280t Euripides
Old-Timers’ Association annual ball, Alcestis, 203, 216
289–90, 293 Hecuba, 219–20, 220, 222
peripheral position of, 294–6 Iphigenia in Aulis, 215–16
piano instruction in, 283 Iphigenia in Tauris, 216
popular music in, 293 The Trojan Women, 216
population by sex, 283t Europa, 119
promotion of music in, 289–94 Examiner, 234
settlement and growth of, 277–8, 279t Exposition Universelle, Paris, 1889, 5–6,
summer band concerts in, 285 300, 314
theatres in, 284 Eybler, Joseph Leopold, 272
violin instruction in, 283
visiting artists, 282 Fahrbach, Philippe, 302, 309
voice instruction in, 283, 295 Falk, Edward, 217
Edmonton Bulletin, 284, 287, 288, 289 Falmouth, Lord, 142n46
Edmonton Journal, 278 Famille, La, 303
Greek music, ancient, continued Harvey, Brian W., The Violin Family,
‘Second Delphic Hymn’, 212 183n30, 193
Seikilos inscription, 208, 210, 213, 219, Hauptmann, Moritz, 14, 136, 253, 254,
221 266–73
Greffulhe, Countess, 306, 309 Bach research of, 268–9, 270
Grétry, André Ernest Modeste, 300 as composer, 268, 269n61
Grieg, Edvard, 308 Mendelssohn’s support of, 267, 268–70,
Peer Gynt, 314 273
Grillet, Laurent, Le Roi Dagobert, 306–7, musical aesthetics, 270–1
314 sacred music programming, 266, 273
Grillparzer, Franz, 124 Hauser, Franz, 268, 272
Grisi, Carlotta, 100 ‘Hausmusik’, 8–9, 28
Grisi, Giulia, 88n8, 110–11 Haweis, Hugh Reginald
Grossmann, Christian Gottlob Leberecht, Music and Morals, 192
257n19 Old Violins and Violin Lore, 183n29
Grote, George, 112n73 Haydn, Franz Joseph
Grote, Harriet, 112n73 The Creation, 111–12n73, 263, 292n43
Grove, George, 60, 65, 77 Mariazeller Messe, 259
Grus firm, 318 Novello publications, 61
Guiraud, Ernest, 321 piano music, 303
sacred music performed in Leipzig,
Gulbransen-Dickinson player piano, 157,
262–3, 265, 272
166–7, 168, 172
The Seasons, 263
Gye, Frederick, 228–36, 239–45
Haydn, Michael, 264–5
gypsy songs, 300
Hayes, Catherine, 91–2n24
Haynes violin dealer, 193
habitus concept, 104
Heaps, J. K., 183n30
Haddock, George, 183n29, 192
Hendra, William J., 282
Hahn, Reynaldo, 317
Hennion, Antoine, 299
‘Hail Columbia’, 109
Her Majesty’s Theatre (London)
Halévy, Fromental, 115, 121
advertising, 316
La Tombola, 312
Benedict as conductor, 135
Hall, Marie, 185, 188 concerts, 136
Hallé, Charles, 131, 133, 134, 180 Lind at, 86, 93n29
Hallé, Lady (Wilma Norman Neruda), 188 Planché’s Oberon at, 140
Hallé Orchestra (Manchester), 132, 133, 134, programming of, 229, 231
138, 145, 146, 149 temporary closure of, 230
Hallet & Davis Piano Co., 157, 159, 160, Verdi operas in repertoire of, 236
166–7, 168n50, 171–2 Wagner’s Lohengrin performed at, 244
Hamm, Charles, 2 world premiere of Verdi’s I masnadieri,
Handel, George Frideric, 272 223, 234n48
Israël en Egypte, 306 Herbert, Christopher, 194n73
Messiah, 263, 292n43 Heron-Allen, Edward
Samson, 292n43 Arts and Crafts Book of the Worshipful
Handel Festivals, 138 Guild of Violin-makers …, 196
Handl, Jacobus, 271 ‘Violin Family’, 183n28, 193
Harrer, G., 253 Herz, Henri, 33
Harris, Augustus, 232n41, 234n47, 245n120 Hesketh, Thomas, 194
Hartmann, Georges, 315 Hess, Willy, 185
Hartmann firm, 317 Heugel, Henri, 301, 302, 304, 305, 317, 318
Harvard Advocate, 206 Heugel, Jacques-Léopold, 301
EDITED BY
ways, pushing back the boundaries of the ‘music as commerce’
discussion. Through diverse, multidisciplinary approaches, the
volume opens up significant paths for conversation about how
musical concepts, practices and products were shaped by
interrelationships between culture and commerce.
Christina Bashford
CHRISTINA BASHFORD is Associate Professor of Musicology at the
University of Illinois.
ROBERTA MONTEMORRA MARVIN is Director of the Opera Studies
and
Forum in the Obermann Center for Advanced Studies at the University
of Iowa, where she is also on the faculty.
Banknotes featuring Claude Debussy and Giuseppe Verdi (photos courtesy of Conrad
Marvin) and musical instruments (© Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main).
COVER DESIGN: JAN MARSHALL