Advance Public Interest Litigation: AWBI Try & Decide PETA India False Allegations
Advance Public Interest Litigation: AWBI Try & Decide PETA India False Allegations
Mobile App: Scouts & Guides for Animals & Birds Website: www.indiancircusfederation.in
………………Petitioners.
Versus
1. Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Haryana
2. State Biodiversity Board, Haryana
3. Animal Welfare Board of India, NIAW Campus, Ballabhgarh.
4. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Faridabad
5. Chief Wildlife Warden of Haryana / DWLO, Gurugram
6. Animal Welfare Division (Govt. of India)
7. Central Zoo Authority of India
8. Bar Council of India, New Delhi.
………………Respondents.
INDEX
1. Petitions 1-5
2. Bar Council of India circular with 2 objections 6-9
3. Master Trainer, AWBI 10-12
4. Volunteer, WCCB 13
5. Commissioner, Bharat Scouts & Guides 14
6. PETA India appreciation 15
7. WTI appreciation 16
8. District Administration, Gurgaon appreciation 17
9. District Administration, Faridabad appreciation 18
10. OIPA in India 19
11. State Committee for Slaughter House (Govt. of Haryana) 20-22
12. Petition moved under RTI Act, 2005: Elephant trading – transfer illegal 23-24
13. Complaint on PG Portal 25-27
th rd
14. 39 with 43 GM of AWBI related to report of PETA India with Notifications 28-37
15. AWBI recommendations to ban Elephant as performing animals with letter 38-39
16. Greens Zoological Rescue and Rehabilitation Kingdom, related information’s 40-50
17. Animal Welfare Board letter about ban on elephant performance on PETA report 51-53
18. Appeal under RTI Act: Mandate of AWBI – Duty & functions with Bio - data 54-61
3
………………Petitioners.
Versus
1. Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Haryana
2. State Biodiversity Board, Haryana
3. Animal Welfare Board of India, NIAW Campus, Ballabhgarh.
4. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Faridabad
5. Chief Wildlife Warden of Haryana / DWLO, Gurugram
6. Animal Welfare Division (Govt. of India)
7. Central Zoo Authority of India
8. Bar Council of India, New Delhi.
………………Respondents.
9. The Animal Welfare Board of India is a statutory advisory body on Animal Welfare Laws
and promotes animal welfare in the country. Established in 1962 under Section 4 of the
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (No. 59 of 1960), the Animal Welfare Board of
India was started under the stewardship of Late Smt. Rukmini Devi Arundale, well known
humanitarian. From ensuring that animal welfare laws in the country are diligently
followed, to provide grants to Animal Welfare Organizations and advising the Government
of India on animal welfare issues, the Board has been the face of the animal welfare
movement in the country. Mandate to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering
on animals, in terms of the provision of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act,
1960. The contents of petition, bearing No. GOVGJ-E-2019-06256 was noted by AWD.
Functions of AWBI:
1. To keep the law in force in India for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals under constant
study and to advise the government on the amendments to be undertaken in any such law
from time to time.
2. To advise the Central Government on the making of rules under the Act with a view to
preventing unnecessary pain or suffering to animals generally, and more particularly when
they are being transported from one place to another or when they are used as performing
animals or when they are kept in captivity or confinement.
3. To advise the Government or any local authority or other person on improvements in the
design of vehicles so as to lessen the burden on draught animals.
4. To take all such steps as the Board may think fit for (amelioration of animals) by
encouraging or providing for, the construction of sheds, water troughs and the like and by
providing for veterinary assistance to animals.
5. To advise the Government or any local authority or other person in the design of slaughter
houses or the maintenance of slaughter houses or in connection with slaughter of animals so
that unnecessary pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is eliminated in the pre
slaughter stages as far as possible, and animals are killed; wherever necessary, in as
humane a manner as possible.
6. To take all such steps as the Board may think fit to ensure that unwanted animals are
destroyed by local authorities, whenever it is necessary to do so, either instantaneously or
after being rendered insensible to pain or suffering.
7. To encourage by the grant of financial assistance or otherwise, (the formation or
establishment of Pinjarapoles, rescue homes, animals shelters, sanctuaries and the like),
where animals and birds may find a shelter when they have become old and useless or when
they need protection.
8. To co-operate with, and co-ordinate the work of, associations or bodies established for the
purpose of preventing unnecessary pain or suffering to animals or for the protection of
animals and birds.
9. To give financial and other assistance to Animal Welfare Organisations functioning in any
local area or to encourage the formation of Animal Welfare Organisations in any local area
which shall work under the general supervision and guidance of the Board.
10. To advise the Government on matters relating to the medical care and attention which may
be provided in animal hospitals, and to give financial and other assistance to animal
hospitals whenever the Board thinks it necessary to do so.
11. To impart education in relation to the humane treatment of animals and to encourage the
formation of public opinion against the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering to
animals and for the promotion of animal welfare by means of lectures, books, posters,
cinematographic exhibitions and the like.
5
12. To advise the Government on any matter connected with animal welfare or the Prevention
of infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals.
But AWBI failed to implement the legal provisions under law, keeping in view section 27 (b) of
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960; because: As per section 31 of the PCA Act, 1960 –
Grievance Description:
Maneka Gandi, below Graduate, claimed to be writer of Animal Laws of India instead compiled
this book with repealed Rules & Regulations for profit, 6th Edition in my hand, compliant lodged
with the Bar Council of India, objected their circular No. 4 of 2015, which recommend this book to
all affiliated Institutions, keeping in view the business & profit of Maneka Gandi.
The Performing Animals Rules, 1973, published in the Animal Laws of India, page No. 33 to 38,
whereas this Rules repealed, introducing another Rule during 2001 and this point was admitted by
the AWBI before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the petition moved by the Asiad Circus.
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1890 was repealed with the PCA Act, 1960 but page No.
426 of said objected book, carry the Delhi Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Amendment) Rules,
1961, Notified under section 15 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1890, amending 1942
Rules, whereas:
1. The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1890 repealed in 1960.
2. Section 15 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1890 is not applicable after 1960 but
notified in 1961, which is unlawful & illegal.
3. The Performing Animals Rules, 1973 repealed but published in the objectionable book for profit
to mislead the public, especially students.
4. Delhi Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Amendment) Rules, 1961 was not based on legal
mechanism, all punishments & convictions under this Rule is totally baseless, whereas Maneka
Gandi enjoyed the position of Delhi SPCA Chairperson but she never raised this point, even her
younger sister enjoying berth without any knowledge.
So, Scouts & Guides for Animals & Birds along with United Nation affiliated OIPA in India and
PFA Haryana - IPFA raised public voice to review the punishments at once under the repealed,
unlawful & illegal Rules & Regulations, re-calling the stock of Animal Laws of India from the open
market along with the circular No. 4 of 2015, issued by the Bar Council of India.
AWBI failed to perform became ineffective, toothless & burden – liability on the Govt. of India,
since 1-4-1974 till date, because: As per section 31 of the PCA Act, 1960 –
Scouts & Guides for Animals & Birds asked: Define, clarify & reproduced, following sections of the
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960:
1. Animals
2. Slaughter House
3. Five freedoms of animals.
4. Relaxation & exemptions as section 11 (3) with 27.
5. Section 28
6. Section 31, cognizable offenses
7. Code of Criminal Procedure, enforced & applicable in India.
8. Punishments under all sections of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
9. Try, efforts & results to replace the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960
10. Rules & Regulations of Camel and Elephants shifting.
11. Animal can be treated as goods
12. Vehicles to carry animals as per Bureau of Indian Standards.
13. Poultry treated as agriculture products.
25
Grievance Description:
Advance copy:
AWBI failed to perform became ineffective, toothless & burden - liability on the Govt. of India,
since 1-4-1974 till date, because: As per section 31 of the PCA Act, 1960 -
Cognizability of offences:
Prayers:
1. Pass appropriate orders to legalize all proceedings onwards 1-4-1974.
2. Direct Respondents to issue ordinance, restoring five freedoms of animals, protecting from
unnecessary pain & sufferings.
3. Recall Bar Council of India circular No. 4 of 2015 along with all unlawful Book of Maneka Gandi
from Educational Institutions.
4. Status reports - white paper on the functioning of AWBI onwards 1-4-1974.
5. Any other orders deems fit.
Naresh Kadyan
26
Grievance Description:
Advance copy:
AWBI failed to perform became ineffective, toothless & burden - liability on the Govt. of India,
since 1-4-1974 till date, because: As per section 31 of the PCA Act, 1960 - Cognizability of offences:
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, (5 of 1898) an
offence punishable under clause (1) or clause (n) or clause, (o) of sub-section (1) of section 11 or
under section 12 shall be a cognizable offence within the meaning of that code. Whereas Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1898, (5 of 1898) repealed onwards 1-4-1974 & Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 enforced, hence all offenses against PCA Act, 1960 are handled by wrong procedure, which is
not enforced - repealed.
Prayers:
2. Direct Respondents to issue ordinance, restoring five freedoms of animals, protecting from
unnecessary pain & sufferings.
3. Recall Bar Council of India circular No. 4 of 2015 along with all unlawful Book of Maneka Gandi
from Educational Institutions.
Personal Achievements
Played principal role exposing Punjab Khadi & VI Board,
applicable in Haryana Khadi & VI Board without
replacing Haryana with Punjab
Exposed Khadi – Sarvodaya Trade Marks
Principle role in omitting ivory products under PMEGP,
Major role in the amended of KVIC Negative list
Haryana Cattle Fairs Act / Punjab Cattle Fairs Act /
Haryana Panchyati Raj Act amended, omitted Elephant
word from the definition of Cattle.
Indian Forest Act, IPC 429, Cattle Trespass Act, Delhi
Police Act, Mumbai Police Act / Haryana Police Act,
needs to be omit Elephant word from the definition of
Cattle.
Two FIR’s lodged, stopping two special cattle trains at Education
Faridabad on 10-12-2000, another one at Gaziabad on 29- M. A Journalism & Mass
12-2000, each trains had 40 boogies of Cow progeny, going Communication
Punjab to West Bengal for slaughtering.
P. G Diploma in Journalism & Mass
Principal role behind removal of dancing beers from the
Communication
Streets, introducing rehabilitation scheme for Kalandars Diploma in Footwear Technology
Whistle blower of Black buck hunting by Former Captain Advance Course in Footwear
of Indian Cricket team Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi, his team Technology with Distinction
Exposed Soha Ali Khan arms license, being non Master Trainer of AWBI
eligibility, moved complaint with Lokayukta of Haryana
Moved Public Interest litigation about Satluz Yamuna
Link canal Recognition:
Moved Public Interest litigation about appointment of
PETA with Wildlife Trust of India
Lokayukta of Haryana
Moved Public Interest litigation about establishment of District Administration of
Haryana Human Rights Commission Faridabad & Gurugram with State
Committee of Urban & Local Body
59
First application under Right to Information
Act, 2005 as on 12-10-2005 related to special
provision of 370 for J&K
Principal role, preventing live animal
export without National Biodiversity
Authority approval being rich species, as
per Peoples Biodiversity Registers
Introduction of Biodiversity Management
Committees all around 62 Cantonments with 28
States & 8 UTs
Compiled two legal books for animal
related laws in Hindi including Biological
Diversity Act, 2002
Major role behind introduction of Camel
transportation rules & regulation, prohibiting
Camel transportation as goods, animal can
travel as per their shape & size
Moved Public Interest Litigation for ban on iron ankush,
Cruel equipment to handle Elephant
Played key role behind Declaration of
Camel as state animal of Rajasthan
Introduction of Central Motor Vehicle
(Eleventh Amendments) Rules, 2015
Successfully run two projects of ambulance for
animals in distress with a scheme for shelter for
treatment, care & shelter
Nodal Inspecting Authority for Haryana &
adjoining areas of Rajasthan, Animal Welfare
Division (Govt. of India)
Inspecting Authority, AWBI
Member, State Committee for Slaughter Houses,
Department of Urban & Local Bodies (Govt. of
Haryana).
Motivate National Horticulture Board
for renewal its registration
Whistle blower of Beef Biryani, lodged FIR in Mewat
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Delhi omitted Bharat Ratna
Exposed AWBI special meeting against the rules
Restoration of five freedoms of Honey Bee, accepted by NBB
Tireless services for 100 Camels of Republic Day parade,
Brought to violating MC Act, introduction of Camel Van
60