GL Conservation Management Plans PDF
GL Conservation Management Plans PDF
Heritage
Contents
Page 1 of 16 • 150723
Guideline
Conservation management plans
Part 1 – Introduction
Purpose
This guide is designed to help owners and managers of heritage places create and use a conservation
management plan (CMP). It is applicable to both private- and publicly-owned heritage places. While primarily
concerned with planning for Queensland Heritage Places (places entered in the Queensland Heritage Register),
the method set out here can guide planning for all types of heritage places and areas. Some places may also
have natural and indigenous heritage values and all values can be addressed within a single CMP.
Part 1 of the guideline outlines what a CMP is, why it is necessary, when it should be prepared, and who will
use it.
Part 2 looks at what goes into the CMP, steps to understand the place through an assessment and identification
process and finally prepare policies that will guide management actions.
Part 3 explains how to use the CMP, carry out the prescribed actions, keep records of actions and, ultimately,
review the document after a set period.
Context
Queensland’s heritage—embodied in its historic buildings, structures, gardens, cemeteries, archaeological sites,
streetscapes, townscapes and landscapes—is a unique, diverse and irreplaceable cultural resource. The
Queensland Heritage Act 1992 (Heritage Act) aims to protect Queensland’s heritage from incompatible
development and neglect, and conserve it for the benefit of the community and for future generations.
Places entered in the Queensland Heritage Register (the Register) can be small—a single structure or tree—
or large, such as a streetscape, townscape, landscape or a complex of buildings. Some places will also have
intangible aspects that are integral to their heritage value, including traditions, events, rituals and practices.
Heritage values are the reasons why a place is important. Cultural heritage significance is the sum of these
values.
The Heritage Act defines cultural heritage significance of a place or feature of a place, as its aesthetic,
architectural, historical, scientific, social, or other significance, to the present generation or past or future
generations. The cultural heritage criteria used for assessing a place for entry in the Register are set out in the
Heritage Act. The Guideline: Assessing cultural heritage significance – Using the cultural heritage criteria explains
how cultural heritage significance is determined.
Cultural heritage significance needs to be considered in all aspects of managing a heritage place—from routine
maintenance through to proposing changes. A CMP complements and enhances these routine activities by
clearly guiding maintenance and conservation priorities.
A CMP will articulate the cultural heritage significance of a heritage place. It is embodied in the place itself, its
fabric, setting, use, associations, meanings, records, related places and related objects. Places may have a
range of values for different individuals and groups.
After clarifying the cultural heritage significance of a heritage place, a CMP then defines the actions needed to
protect that significance.
Changes to a heritage place are almost always needed if the place is to be retained and used into the future,
but these changes can have unintended impacts. A CMP will define the kinds of changes that can be made
without compromising the cultural heritage significance of the place. The policies in a CMP will describe the best
way to make necessary changes.
To achieve approvals
Heritage places protected in the Register require formal approval before certain changes can be made. A well-
prepared CMP can give the assessing authority the information it needs to inform its decision-making and can
help reduce the number of applications that need to be made.
Some grant programs require a CMP for funded works to a heritage place.
similarly, the assessing authority will measure its assessment of the proposals against those policies.
Historians and other researchers will find the CMP a useful resource.
For more complex sites, data sheets for individual buildings or components, or room by room documentation
may be needed. To make the CMP readable, it may be best to put this detailed information in an appendix, with
a summary in the body of the document.
• a prioritised conservation works plan or schedule that identifies the works required to remedy issues
identified in the condition survey, and any other recommended repairs, restoration or reconstruction. A
works schedule may form the basis for commissioning a contractor to undertake those works, although
detailed specifications and working drawings may need to be prepared, and development approval
obtained for Queensland Heritage Places, as separate projects after the CMP is completed.
• management protocols to address specific issues. For example, if a place contains very fragile and
unstable fabric, a protocol may be developed that limits the number of people who can access the place
over a period of time.
Take action
The CMP will have recommended actions, in priority order, that should now be undertaken.
Some actions may be integrated into existing management practices, such as in regular monitoring of the
condition of the place and in regular maintenance regimes.
Other actions may require additional preparatory work, including:
• developing specifications for contractors to undertake conservation works defined in the CMP
• preparing and lodging development applications for any specific actions that require heritage or
planning approval.
Keep records
Keeping records is a vital part of caring for a heritage place and implementing the CMP. You should also:
• keep a logbook of maintenance works—record the dates, actions taken, contractor used, estimated and
actual costs and results achieved
• use this valuable resource for planning and carrying out future maintenance. Further details of
maintenance plans can be accessed in the Heritage Technical note series available on the
Queensland Government website at www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/heritage/
• record regular inspections and condition monitoring—identify what was inspected, when the inspection
took place, what was found, and any actions required. An inspection schedule is available in the
Heritage Technical note series available on the Queensland Government website at
www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/heritage/
• log issues—record when new issues arise, what decisions were made, and what action was taken.
Test proposals for change
Managing change to a heritage place can be challenging. Proposals for change must be tested against the CMP
to assess both positive and negative heritage impacts.
Consider heritage impacts in a step-by-step approach:
• Proposal—examine the extent and nature of the change proposed, possible alternatives and assess the
impacts, both positive and negative
• Significance—consider the impacts against the statement of significance
• Statutory requirements and conservation obligations—consider the statutory requirements and the
conservation obligations defined in the CMP
• Conservation policy—review the proposed change against the CMP policies. If the CMP does not
address the type of change proposed, assess the proposal against the significance of the place and
prepare a new policy
• Consultation—there may be interested parties who should be consulted.
• From a heritage perspective, the best option will be the one that minimises adverse impacts on the
heritage significance of the place. It is wise to test several options: for help, see Guideline: Preparing a
heritage impact statement on the Queensland Government website at
www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/heritage/
Review
A CMP needs to be current. Usually, a CMP has a life of five to 10 years before needing review. If
circumstances change, a CMP may need earlier review and revision if, for example, there is:
Further information
• call 13 13 QGOV (13 74 68) and ask to speak to a Heritage Branch officer
• visit www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/heritage/
• use
• visitor and public access
• views of external stakeholders
• condition and threats
Content Notes
• to enable (client name) to gain a better understanding Tell the consultants about the specific
of the significance of (place name) so that its heritage issues of concern. They can then
values can be managed consider these issues in shaping their
• to provide specific advice on potential future use approach and in selecting the skills
needed on the team.
• to involve the local community and other
stakeholders.
Content Notes
Content Notes
Content Notes
(Number) copy/ies of the proposal are required Use postal, street or email address.
Proposals must be submitted by (date and time) to (person
and address).
Heritage legislation
Commonwealth: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Available from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts
www.environment.gov.au
General references
Australia ICOMOS, The Burra Charter: the Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance 2013,
2013
Meredith Walker and Peter Marquis-Kyle, The Illustrated Burra Charter: Good Practice for Heritage Places,
2004. A casebook of examples that illustrate how the principles and processes in the Burra Charter can be
applied to real places. Available from Australia ICOMOS www.icomos.org/australia
James Semple Kerr, The Conservation Plan: a guide to the preparation of conservation plans for places of
European cultural significance, 6th edition, 2004, National Trust (NSW).
Available from the National Trust NSW www.nsw.nationaltrust.org.au/shop/index.htm#books
Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the
licence terms.
You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication.
For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en
Disclaimer
This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of
publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made
by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this
document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy.
If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service
(TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470.
This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with
vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>.
August 2015