Gareth Walton - Physio Workshop - Mechanics of Multi Direction Speed PDF
Gareth Walton - Physio Workshop - Mechanics of Multi Direction Speed PDF
OUR STORY
2009 2014
Core Performance 2012 EXOS brand
1999 opens first Corporate
launch
Athletes’ Performance AP trains
founded by Mark Verstegen Performance Centers
opens in Tempe, AZ with Intel & Google 14 NFL
1st Rd picks
2005
2007
Start of relationship with 2011 2013
German National Soccer Argentina Fast Company – NFL Players
team in preparation for Rugby Most Innovative Association -
The Trust Program
2006 World Cup Company in Sports
2011
Intel IRB study
published
2011 2013
Mayo Clinic
AP begins partnership
working with US 2013
2006 2008
2003 National Selected as sole Human
AP begins CPRO & CPESD
Men’s Soccer Performance Provider for
Athletes’ Performance – opens at providing invented
U.S. Special Operations
the Home Depot Center in
Carson, CA solutions to 2010 Team
Forces as part of
the Military
Chinese Preservation of the Force
Olympic and Family (POTFF)
Federation 2011 program
Series D
2011
Galatasary
2015
Club Athletico
2009 Paranaense
LA Galaxy 2010
Chinese
Olympic 2011
Federation Polish National Team
5
Provide the finest performance systems, specialists and
facilities seamlessly integrated to efficiently and ethically
enhance our athlete’s performance
6
SYSTEM PILLARS
7
TRAINING SYSTEM COMPONENTS
8
MOVEMENT SKILLS
Develop specific movement skills under reactive and non-reactive conditions in an effort to
optimize transfer to sport
LINEAR MULTIDIRECTIONAL
9
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL SPEED
APPLYING THE TEC MODEL
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
12
01
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Shuffle & Cross-over
- Posture
- Leg action
- Arm action
COACHING PYRAMID
Rotational
ARM ACTION balance
Inside leg
LEG ACTION Outside leg
Center of mass
POSTURE Base of support
Verstegen, 2014.
14
CRITICAL POSITION 1
BASE POSITION
“Stay low”
“Set your angles”
“Attack the ground”
21
TEC MODEL: OPTIMAL
PATTERN Coordination
POSITION Mobility/stability
22
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
23
HIGH CENTER OF MASS: 5-10-5
24
HIGH CENTER OF MASS: L-DRILL
25
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
26
RESISTED SHUFFLE LOAD & LIFT
27
RESISTED CROSS-OVER LOAD & LIFT
28
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
29
BASE OF SUPPORT: 5-10-5
30
BASE OF SUPPORT: L-DRILL
31
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
32
SLED RESISTED SHUFFLE
33
SLED RESISTED CROSS-OVER
34
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
35
FOOT LOADING: L-DRILL
36
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
37
RESISTED 90° CROSS-OVER SPRINT
38
TEC MODEL: MULTI-DIRECTIONAL
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT
Resisted shuffle
High center of mass
“Stay under the load/lift
Low center of mass Excessive compensatory spinal
roof” Resisted x-over
flexion
load/lift
Sled resisted
Narrow or excessively wide base of “Low & shuffle
Optimal angles of attack
support aggressive cut” Sled resisted x-
over
“Imagine Resisted
Foot loading favors the midline Inappropriate loading of foot jumping as far as 90° x-over sprint
possible”
39
40
03
CONCLUSIONS
ACCELERATION: CONCLUSIONS
42
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
43
REFERENCES
Gambetta, V. (2007). Athletic development: The art & science of functional sports
conditioning. Human Kinetics.
Jeffreys, I. (2006). Motor Learning---Applications for Agility, Part 1. Strength & Conditioning
Journal, 28(5), 72-76.
Jeffreys, I. (2006). Motor Learning---Applications for Agility, Part 2. Strength & Conditioning
Journal, 28(6), 10-14.
Jeffreys, I. (2010). Gamespeed: Movement Training for Superior Sports Performance.
Coaches Choice.
Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: classifications, training
and testing. Journal of sports sciences, 24(9), 919-932.
Sheppard, J. M., et al. "An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to
sprint speed and change of direction speed." Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 9.4
(2006): 342-349.
Verstegen, M., & Williams, P. (2014). Every Day Is Game Day: The Proven System of Elite
Performance to Win All Day, Every Day. Penguin.
45