Math Narrative Final
Math Narrative Final
Application of Mathematics
Division of Labor
in Teachers
Presented by:
Marasigan, Jerick
Manalo, Geisha L.
Atienza, Alexis
Presented to:
INTRODUCTION
most often applied to systems of mass production and is one of the basic
repetitive tasks eliminates unnecessary motion and limits the handling of different
tools and parts. The consequent reduction in production time and the ability to
costs and a less expensive final product. Contrary to popular belief, however,
caused by an assumed natural increase in the size and density of population and
of larger goods (such as houses or canoes); in these cases the division is often a
temporary one, and each worker is competent to perform other phases of the
task. There may be some specialization in types of products (e.g., one worker
may produce pottery for religious uses; another, pottery for ordinary uses), but
A division of labor based on sex appears to be universal, but the form that
this takes varies widely across cultures. Divisions on the basis of age, clan
and efficiency. If you split up workers and give them specific jobs to do, efficiency
increases significantly.
Adam Smith
The division of labor helped economies grow during the nineteenth and
twentieth century. Since the turn of the century, mass customization, which
requires several skills and an extremely short machine change-over time, the
Wealth of Nations.’
production task into several, or many, sub-tasks. Its importance in economics lies
in the fact that a given number of workers can produce far more output using
division of labor compared to the same number of workers each working alone.
Interestingly, this is true even if those working alone are expert artisans. The
production increase has several causes. According to Adam Smith, these include
increased dexterity from learning, innovations in tool design and use as the steps
are defined more clearly, and savings in wasted motion changing from one task
to another.
would seem that exchange can arise only from differences in taste or
circumstance. But division of labor implies that this is not true. In fact, even a
of market economies.
advantage as an explanation for the origins of trade. And this explanation has
each nation specializes, then total consumption in the world, and in each nation,
is expanded. Interestingly, this is still true if one nation is better at producing both
commodities: even the less productive nation benefits from specialization and
trade.
Meoqui points out. The reason is that division of labor produces a cost advantage
Origins
The Neolithic Revolution, with its move to fixed agriculture and greater
all of us have many wants… Then, as we have many wants, and many persons
are needed to supply them, one takes a helper… and another… [W]hen these
partners and helpers are gathered together in one habitation the body of
inhabitants is termed a State… And they exchange with one another, and one
gives, and another receives, under the idea that the exchange will be for their
good. (The Republic, Book II) This idea of the city-state, or polis, as a nexus of
cooperation directed by the leaders of the city is a potent tool for the social
theorist. It is easy to see that the extent of specialization was limited by the size
of the city: a clan has one person who plays on a hollow log with sticks; a
moderately sized city might have a string quartet; and a large city could support a
symphony.
benefits of specialization:
The power of the individual human being is not sufficient for him to obtain
(the food) he needs, and does not provide him with as much food as he requires
to live. Even if we assume an absolute minimum of food –that is, food enough for
one day, (a little) wheat, for instance – that amount of food could be obtained
only after much preparation such as grinding, kneading, and baking. Each of
these three operations requires utensils and tools that can be provided only with
the help of several crafts, such as the crafts of the blacksmith, the carpenter, and
the potter. Assuming that a man could eat unprepared grain, an even greater
and reaping, and threshing to separate it from the husks of the ear. Each of these
operations requires a number of tools and many more crafts than those just
mentioned. It is beyond the power of one man alone to do all that, or (even) part
among his fellow beings, if he is to obtain food for himself and for them. Through
cooperation, the needs of a number of persons, many times greater than their
translation]
direction, limited by the size of the city, later motivated scholars such as Emile
human flourishing.
Smith’s Insight
labor. Such claims are simply mistaken, on several grounds Smith described
done. Smith had two key insights: Smith’s parable of the “street porter and the
the cause, as theeffect of the division of labour. The difference between the most
example, seems to arise not so much from nature, as from habit, custom, and
Second, the division of labor gives rise to market institutions and expands
the extent of the market. Exchange relations relentlessly push against borders
and expand the effective locus of cooperation. The benefit to the individual is that
first dozens, then hundreds, and ultimately millions, of other people stand ready
to work for each of us, in ways that are constantly being expanded into new
pin-making into 18 operations. But that number is arbitrary: labor is divided into
the number of operations that fit the extent of the market. In a small market,
factory to (a) expand the number of operations even more, and to automate them
through the use of tools and other capital; and to (b) expand the size of the
market served with consequently lower-cost pins so that the expanded output
could be sold. Smith recognized this dynamic pressure in the form of what can
Wealth of Nations: “That the Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the
Market.” George Stigler treated this claim as a testable theorem in his 1951
Still, the full importance of Smith’s insight was not recognized and
Yoon, 2002). While the bases of trade and exchange can be differences in tastes
negligible. The Smithian conception of the basis for trade and the rewards from
developing market institutions is more general and more fundamental than the
advantage, lying in climate or other factors, of course. But division of labor alone
TEACHERS
Teachers are one of the most influential and powerful forces for equity,
remain preoccupying.
teachers one of its top priorities. This focus has been reinforced by Sustainable
for Action, which has a target calling for a substantial increase in qualified
2030 and they work together to address the “teacher gap” as well as tackle the
issues raised in target 4.c and in the Incheon Declaration, which specifically calls
for Member States to “ensure that teachers and educators are empowered,
on five areas:
teaching profession;
learning;
teaching
TEACHING
Technology
PERCENTAGE : 100%
The table above, shows that the most preferred way of teaching is the
one is the board and chalk which is the least preferred way of teaching having a
Teachers are developing lesson plans that may not be delivering the
learning message that speaks to the times, as well as student learning abilities.
How can we fix this issue? By integrating technology into the classroom.
Utilizing technology and implementing tech into lesson plans can ensure a
education in big ways, forming new bonds between students and teachers, and
students take responsibility for their learning outcomes, while teachers become
for educators. This is due to the tech resources needed, like computers, tablets,
software/apps, internet access, and more. With a bit of due diligence, these
obstacles can be overcome and tech can be tethered with the learning
The paragraph below, will show the answers of our interviewee ( Mr. CB Harren
In the question, how do you divide your task as teacher when in school and at
home? Most of them, answered that it is all about the time management since
through time we can so a lot of things needed to fulfill our obligations. On the
side of Ma’am Sarah Ledesma and CB Harren James Bautista, when they have
unfinished school work they tend to divide those tasks on what they will do at
home just to lessen the school works and for them also to do their other
obligations especially in the part of Sir Harren since he have a lot of duties in
Lemery Colleges that is why, he manage his time carefully to execute those task
rested on his profession. While in the side of our other two interviewee, Ma’am
Jamaica Lawi, and Ma’am Mherjane Landicho, they prefer to finish their work and
tasks in school because they believe that when they go back home, work is not
included anymore because it is the time to bond with their families. And their
family ties maybe strong so that, it is very important for them to a lot enough time
KEY TERMS
“Time management” is the process of organizing and planning how to divide your time
between specific activities. Good time management enables you to work smarter – not
harder – so that you get more done in less time, even when time is tight and pressures are
high.
Family time
The role of the family can have a significant impact on emotional and behavioral
with children as the first step to raising happy children who will make a positive
contribution to society.
The ultimate goal of family time is to create opportunities for all members of the
family to love and understand each other, in the process growing happy, well-
adjusted children.
1. Fosters communication
discussions.
discover what their children’s strengths and weaknesses are. It also opens
the door to sharing new experiences together which can help build
Parents are a child’s greatest and most influential teacher. Spending time
way toward strengthening family ties and bonds. Trying new experiences,
When spending time together, children can voice their thoughts and
feelings and seek advice about issues that have been troubling them.
If a child has your undivided attention, it signals that they are loved and
together, as it demonstrates that you want to spend time with your children
works?
dividing the students into groups. The first way is through the student’s last name
this way is the second common way in grouping the students. While the other
CONCLUSIONS
1. The most prefer way of teaching or teaching tool is the use of Integration
2. They divide their task through the use of time management which is the
3. They group their students based on the last name and sitting position of
the learners.