0% found this document useful (0 votes)
321 views

Assignment Nos 1-7

The document contains citations to numerous cases and legal ethics rules related to the legal profession in the Philippines. It discusses topics like admission to the bar, lawyer's duties, disbarment and suspension procedures, and the lawyer-client relationship. Specific cases and rules are referenced pertaining to legal ethics, duties to society and the legal profession, advertising and solicitation rules, and conflicts of interest. The extensive list provides an overview of important legal authorities that guide and regulate the practice of law in the Philippines.

Uploaded by

Fatima Magsino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
321 views

Assignment Nos 1-7

The document contains citations to numerous cases and legal ethics rules related to the legal profession in the Philippines. It discusses topics like admission to the bar, lawyer's duties, disbarment and suspension procedures, and the lawyer-client relationship. Specific cases and rules are referenced pertaining to legal ethics, duties to society and the legal profession, advertising and solicitation rules, and conflicts of interest. The extensive list provides an overview of important legal authorities that guide and regulate the practice of law in the Philippines.

Uploaded by

Fatima Magsino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

BASIC LEGAL ETHICS Additional Assignment 1

 RE: 2003 Bar Examination BM No. 1222, February 2,


 LEB RESOLUTION NO. 2019-406 2004
 Admission to Practice The Bar Examination  Are there too many lawyer’s in the Philippines? 262
 The Lawyer’s Oath
SCRA 189

 Membership in the Integrated Bar


 Legal Ethics 45 Phil 931

 Disbarment and Suspension


 The right to counsel 57 SCRA 481

 Cases:
 The decorum of a legal practitioner 93 SCRA 103

 PCGG V Sandiganbayan 455 SCRA 526


 Barcenas v Alvero 619 SCRA 1

 Director of Religious Affairs v Bayot 74 PHIL 579


 Oria v Tupaz 438 SCRA 575

 Del Mundo v Capistrano 699 SCRA 462


 IN re: Victorio Lanuevo 66 SCRA 245

 Tejana v Baterina 748 SCRA 259 (2015)


 Ecraela v Pangalagan 769 SCRA 361

 Ledesma V Climaco, GR No. 12815 (June, 28, 1974)


 Umaguing v De Vera 749 SCRA 473

 Luna v. Galarrita 762 SCRA 1 (2015)


 Alonso v Relamida 626 SCRA 281

 Villegas v Legazpi 113 SCRA 39


 Pangan v Ramos 93 SCRA 87

 Cui v. Cui 11 SCRA 755


 Madrid v Dealca 734 SCRA 468

 Alawi v. Alauya 268 SCRA 629


 In re: Salazar 92 SCRA 1

 Enriquez v Jimenez 107 PHIL 932


 Omico Mining and Industrial Corporation v Vallejos, GR
NO. L-38974, March 25, 1975
 Phillippine Lawyer’s Association v Agrava 105 Phil 173
 In re Cunanan, 94 Phil 534
 Pangan v Ramos 93 SCRA 87
 Collantes v Renomeron 200 SCRA 584
 Salcedo v Hernandez, GR No. 42992, August 8, 1935
 In re: Almacen 31 SCRA 562
 Blanza v Arcangel, AC No. 492, September 5, 1967
 In re: Argosino, BM No 712, March 19, 1997
 Ui v. Bonifacio 333 SCRA 38
 Kurada v Jalandoni, GR No. L-2662, March 26, 1949
 Delez v Aragona, AM No. 27 SCRA 633
 People v Villanueva, GR No. L-19450, May 27, 1965
 Zoreta v Simpliciano, AC No. 6492, November 18,
 Dia- Annonuevo v Bercacio, AM No 177-MJ, November
2004
27, 1975
 A1 Financial Services v Valerio, AC No 8390, July 2,
 De Guzman v. Visayan Rapid Transit, GR No. 46396,
2010
September 30, 1939
 Cayetano v Monsod, 201 SCRA 210
 In re: Edillon, AC 1928, 12/19/1980  AM No. 11-6-10-SC
 Bacarro v Pinatacan, ADM Case 559-SBC, January 31,  AM No. 12-8-8-SC
1984
 AM No. 11-9-4-SC
 Tajan v Cusi, GR No. L-28899, May 30, 1974
 am no 15-06-10-sc
 Alcala v De Vera, AC No 620, March 21, 1974
 am no 08-8-7-sc
 Cantibuhan v Cruz, GR No. L-51813-14, November 29,
 Lubiano v. Gordolla, 115 SCRa 459
1983
 Hydro Resources, contractors corporation v
 Samonte v. Abellana, 727 SCRA 80
Pagalilauan, GR No. L-62909, April 18, 1989  OCA v. Flores, 585 SCRA 82
 Ramos v Rada, AM No 202, July 22, 1975  Narag v. Narag 291 SCRA 451
 Beltran v Abad, AM No 139, March 28, 1983  Figueroa v. Barranco, 276 SCRA 445
 Diao v Martinez, AC No. 244, March 29, 1963  Overgaard v. Valdez 597 SCRA 118
 Jardeleza v Sereno, 733 SCRA 279  Catalan v.Silvosa 677 SCRA 352
 Guarinv Limpin 875 SCRA 459  Linsangan v. Tolentino, 598 SCRA 133
 AM No 17-03-09 SC  Koppel v. Makati Rotary Club foundation 705 SCRA 142
 AM No. 19-03-24-SC Rule 138 Law Student Practice  OCA v. Floro Jr. 486 SCRA 66 V
 Notarial Practice (AM No. 02-8-13-SC, as amended)  Montcecillo v. Gica, 60 SCRA 234
 Qualifications of a notary public  In re Gutierrez, 5 SCRA 661
 Term of Office of a notary public
 Oronce v. Ca, 298 SCRA 133
 Powers and limitations
 De Yassi V. NLRC, 231 SCRA 173
 Notarial Register
 Jurisdiction of notary public and place of
 Pajares v. Abad Santos, G.R. No. L-29543, November
29,1969
notarization
 Competent evidence of identity  People v. Rosquetta, g.R. No. L-36138, January 31, 1974
 Sanctions  Roy v. CA, G.R. No. 80718, January 29, 1988
 The Code of Professional Responsibility  Jose v. CA, G.R. No. L-38581, March 31, 1976

ASSIGNMENT NO. 2
 People v. Pindeda, G.R. No. L-26222, July 21, 1967

 Bar Matter No. 850  People v. Madera, G.R. No. L-35133, May 31, 1974

 AM No. 03-01-09-SC  Tan v. Gallardo,G.R. No. L-41213-14, Oct 5, 1976


 Misamin v. San Juan, A. M. No. 1418, August 31, 1976
 Lawyer’s Duties to Society Assignment No. 5
 The Lawyer and Society Canons 1-6  Attorney Client relationship
 Uy V. Gonzales 426 SCRA 422
Assignment No. 3
 Bar matter 1625 October 13, 2015
 Rilloraza v. Eastern Telecommunications, 309 SCRA 566

 Lawyer’s duties to the legal profession


 Orbit Transport v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission,
G.R. No. L-38768, july 23, 1974
 Canons 7-9
 REgala v. Sandiganbayan G.R. No. 105938, September 20,
 Ulep v. Legal Clinic Bar Matter 553, 223 SCRA 378 1996
 Rivera v. Angeles A.C. 2519 339 SCRA 149
 Ducat v. Villalon A.C. No. 3910 337 SCRA 622 Assignment No. 6
 In Re: Salazar, 92 SCRA 1  Canons 14-15

 Tan V. Sabandal B.M. No. 44, February 10, 1989  Santiago v. Fojas, 245 SCRA 68

 Pangan v. Ramos, A.M. No. 1053, Aug 31, 1981  Cantiller v. Potenciano 180 SCRA 246

 In RE: Gutierrez, A.M. No. L-363, July 31, 1962  Millare v. Montero 246 SCRA 1

 Narido v. Linsangan, A.M. No. 944, July 25, 1974  Abragan v. Rodriguez 380 SCRA 93

 Laput v. Remotigue, A.M. No. 219, September 29, 1962  Aninon v. SAbitsana 669 SCRA76
Assignment no. 7
 Camacho v. Pangulayan, A.C. No. 4807, March 22, 2000
 Canons 16- 22
 TekBeng v. David, A.C. No. 1261, December 29, 1983
 Aquino v. CA G.R. No. 109493 1999
 Angeles v. Uy, 330 SCRA 6
Assignment 4
 Nakpil v. Valdez 186 SCRA 758
 Canons 10-13
 Pentecostes v. Ibanez 304 SCRA 281
 Young v. Batuegas, 403 SCRa 123
 Chavez v. Viola A.C. No. 2152. April 19, 1991
 RE: Suspension of Atty. Rogelio Z. Bagabuyo,
 Former State Proseuctor, 535 SCRA 200
 Montecillo v. Gica, 60 SCRA 234
 Foodsphere v. Mauricio, 593 SCRA 367

You might also like