Brahms - Schicksalslied
Brahms - Schicksalslied
54”
Yu Hang Tan
Following the successful premiere performances of the Ein deutsches Requiem in 1868,
Brahms visited his good friend Albert Dietrich in Wilhelmshaven, who arranged the Requiem’s
premiere. During his short stay at Wilhelmshaven, Brahms discovered a poem by Hölderlin
humanist with a deep appreciation for the literature of Greek antiquity and fascination for fate-
related texts (refer to Appendix 1) himself, Brahms was immediately gripped by the poem’s
theme: the contrasts between the easy lives of the “selige Genien” (blessed genii) and the
struggles of the mortals on earth2. In Dietrich’s own writing thirty years later, Dietrich described
“[Brahms], who was usually so lively, was quiet and grave […] He had found Hölderlin’s poems
in the bookcase and had been deeply impressed […]. He hurried back to Hamburg, in order to
work, took him three years to complete. He had no problem capturing the happy spirit of the first
and second verses that directly address the gods, the ‘blessed ones’ who wander ‘above in the
light’, and to illustrate the plight of the ‘suffering mortals’ in the third verse. However, the
unsparing conclusion of the poem (refer to Appendix 2 for full translation of the poem),
presented Brahms with a dilemma. He completed an initial setting with the third movement
being a complete restatement of the first.4 However, he felt that a full restatement of the warm
and hopeful first movement would nullify the harsh reality depicted in the second movement.5
1
George Bozarth, Walter Frisch, "Brahms, Johannes." Grove Music Online. 2001
2
Nicole Grimes. “Brahms’s Ascending Circle: Hölderlin, Schicksalslied and the Process of Recollection.”
Nineteenth - Century Music Review 11, no. 1 (June 1, 2014): 65.
3
Walter Niemann. Brahms. New York: Tudor Pub. Co., 1937, p. 87.
4
Bozarth, Walter, “Brahms”.
5
Grimes. “Brahms’s” Nineteenth - Century Music Review, p. 71
Unconvinced by his first draft of the third movement, Brahms turned his attention to the Alto
Rhapsody from 1869 to 1870.6 In 1871, a conductor friend of Brahms, Hermann Levi proposed
that instead of a full restatement of the first movement, a orchestral postlude that reintroduces
only the orchestral prelude should be used to conclude the piece. Convinced by Levi, Brahms
wrote the third movement with a richer instrumentation and transposed the material of the
Musical Analysis
By encapsulating the contrasting verses 1 and 2 (about the trouble-free lives of the gods
on high), and verse 3 (tormented existence of the mortals below) with an orchestral prelude and
postlude with the same material, Schicksalslied can be seen as a large binary form contained
within a cyclic frame.8 Section A comprises of verses 1 and 2, and it is set in E-flat major.
Something worth noting is that E-flat major is a key Brahms had used on only three occasions
composed shortly before his suicide attempt in 1854), Trio for Piano, Violin and Horn, op. 40
(the second movement was an elegy on the death of Brahms’s mother), and the fourth movement
of Ein deutsches Requiem – and all three of these works are associated with loss and
bereavement.9 While verses 1 and 2 in the section A are all about the worriless lives of the gods,
concept of a naïve, simple life that represents nature prior to human intervention10. Therefore,
6
Bozarth, Frisch, “Brahms”, Grove Music Online
7
Symphony Silicon Valley. (n. d.) Program Notes: Schicksalslied (Song of Destiny), Opus 54 (1871). Symphony
Silicon Valley.
8
Bozarth, “Brahms”, Grove
9
Grimes. “Brahms’s Ascending Circle: Hölderlin, Schicksalslied and the Process of Recollection.” Nineteenth -
Century Music Review.
10
Violetta Waibel, “Hölderlin’s Idea of ‘Bildungstrieb’: A Model from Yesteryear?”, Educational Philosophy and
Theory 50, no. 6-7 (May 12, 2018): 640–651.
Brahms decision to begin Schicksalslied in E-flat major can be interpreted as an irony between
‘aorgic’ and the reality we live in, foreshadowing what is about to come in the section B.
diminished triads heard in the winds and horns (refer Appendix 3), separating the gods or the
‘aorgic’ from the reality and struggles of the mortals. Opening with unsettling tremolos in the
strings, Section B is violently agitated, illustrating the pains of the ‘suffering humans’. Setting to
C minor and marked Allegro tempo, section B is also the section in which the music is at its most
dissonant. At the apex of this section (measure 132, refer appendix 4), the chorus sings a B
Marked Adagio, the third movement was set to C major and returned from 3/4 to
common time. Although shifting tonality was nothing new by the time Schicksalslied was
composed, closing the piece with a key other than its opening was new in terms of Brahms’s
œuvre.11 Transposing the opening material from E-flat major to C major could be interpreted as
Brahms’s desire to relieve the gloom the text by shedding a ray of light over the whole. As with
his Ein deutsches Requiem, which was composed a year before this piece, his message seems to
be that hope and consolation for the living may be found here on earth.12
Performance challenges
The choral writing for Schicksalslied is mostly homophonic with two separate fugal
sections in measures 194-222 and 222-273. The choral parts are general well supported by the
accompaniment and mostly vocally doable with a few big and unexpected leaps. The phrases are
11
Grimes, “Brahms’s” Nineteenth - Century Music Review.
12
Pysh, Gregory. “A Conductor’s Guide to Choral/ Orchestral Repertoire.” The Choral Journal 58, no. 7 (February
1, 2018): 83–84; Symphony Silicon Valley. (n. d.) Program Notes: Schicksalslied (Song of Destiny), Opus 54
(1871). Symphony Silicon Valley; Grimes, “Brahms’s” Nineteenth - Century Music Review.
not particularly long. In general, the choral writing is conservative but expressive. The following
There are several big leaps in the choral parts that require special attention for the
negotiation of registration to make sure that the upward leaps do not sound pushed or too dark
(too much chest voice for the high note) and singers do not sing the low note in downward leaps
with too much force. The following are some pitch sequences (bigger than major 6th) that could
m. 316 (Soprano): A5 to A4 leap. Make sure sopranos do not dump on the low
Balance issues
Dynamic levels in this piece in most of the time correlate to the natural projection level of
its respective tessitura. In case of top- or bottom-heavy choirs, the following section may require
some special attention and potentially re-distribution of singers to ensure desired balance:
m. 52: Potential balance issue due to sopranos and altos on the lower end of their
m. 80 & 132: May need more altos, tenors and basses to balance out the high A
sung in the soprano part. Consider moving some of the sopranos down to alto.
m. 156 (Soprano and alto): The big downward leap from m. 155 to 156 in the
upper voice might affect the intelligibility of the soprano and alto part in measure
156. Remind the upper voices to brighten their vowels and keep tongues forward.
Hemiolas
In an effort to elicit an effect of gasping for breath, Brahms inserted a series of hemiolas
that are spaced out with quarter rests and staccatos over the text “Wasser von Klippe zu Kluppe
geworfen” in measures 146 to 152 (see Appendix 5), and 305 to 312 (See Appendix 5)13. Remind
choir to feel the long lines and include the quarter rests as part of the phrase to avoid making the
For conductors with choirs under 20 singers and with young voices should program this
piece knowing that although the choral writing of this piece is generally approachable, the piece
still calls for mature or trained voices, capable of producing wide range of pitches, dynamics and
expressions. Programming this piece for small choirs with untrained voice could lead to over
singing and strained voices in effort to produce a full and rich (not dark) Romantic, Brahmsian
tone. Tempo in this piece should be elastic and rubato could be used to reflect the expressive
nuances of text. However, such fluctuation should be limited to one degree within phrases to
13
Michael Steinberg, Choral Masterworks : a Listener’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Bibliography
Bozarth, George S., and Walter Frisch. "Brahms, Johannes." Grove Music Online. 2001;
https://www-oxfordmusiconline-
com.libproxy1.usc.edu/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo
-9781561592630-e-0000051879.
Daverio, John. "The "Wechsel Der Töne" in Brahms's "Schicksalslied"." Journal of the
American Musicological Society 46, no. 1 (1993): 84-113. doi:10.2307/831806.
Grimes, Nicole. “Brahms’s Ascending Circle: Hölderlin, Schicksalslied and the Process of
Recollection.” Nineteenth - Century Music Review 11, no. 1 (June 1, 2014): 57–92.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1550986802/.
Grimes, Nicole. Brahms’s Elegies : the Poetics of Loss in Nineteenth-Century German Culture
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Pysh, Gregory. “A Conductor’s Guide to Choral/ Orchestral Repertoire.” The Choral Journal 58,
no. 7 (February 1, 2018): 83–84. http://search.proquest.com/docview/2012832155/.
Steinberg, Michael. Choral Masterworks : a Listener’s Guide Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2005.
Symphony Silicon Valley. (n. d.) Program Notes: Schicksalslied (Song of Destiny), Opus 54
(1871). Symphony Silicon Valley.
https://www.symphonysiliconvalley.org/concerts.php?pagecontID=56&showID=54
A copy of Brahms’s annotation to Hölderlin’s poem ‘An die Parzen’ as found in his copy of
Friedrich Hölderlin, Sämmtlich Werke. This book is now housed in the Archive of the
Gesellschaft der Musikfreude in Vienna. In this annotation, it can be seen that Brahms underlined
certain words and, at some points, even particular letters in the poem.
Translation:
To the Fates
Measure 102 and 103 showing two diminished chords preceding the section B in the winds and
horns section.
Appendix 4
Hemiolas in measures 146 to 152, and 305 to 312 spaced out with quarter rests and staccatos.