Scribd
Upload
640 views

Evaluation Form

The document is an evaluation form for validating a semi-structured questionnaire. It lists 7 criteria for evaluation including clarity, organization, suitability, adequacy, objectivity, attainment of objectives, and appropriateness of the rating scale. Validators are asked to rate each criterion on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide their name and signature.

Uploaded by

Zarry Malik Stylik
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
640 views

Evaluation Form

The document is an evaluation form for validating a semi-structured questionnaire. It lists 7 criteria for evaluation including clarity, organization, suitability, adequacy, objectivity, attainment of objectives, and appropriateness of the rating scale. Validators are asked to rate each criterion on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide their name and signature.

Uploaded by

Zarry Malik Stylik
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Evaluation Form

Content validity tool for semi-structured Questionnaire

The instrument is designed to describe the criteria for the questionnaires evaluation.

Direction: Please put a check on each statement that corresponds to the following point equivalent.

Point Equivalent:

5 – Excellent

4 – Very Good

3 – Good

2 – Fair

1 – Poor

Criteria for Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

1. Clarity of Direction and Items

The questions are presented in a manner that


is clear and comprehensive.

2. Presentations/Organization

The items are organized in logical manner

3. Suitability

The items appropriately represent the


substance of the research. The questions are
designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured

4. Adequateness of Items per Category

The number of questions is enough to answer


the need for research

5. Objectivity

The questions being asked do not suggest bias


on the part of the researcher

6. Attainment of Items per Category

The instrument as a whole fulfils the


objective/goal to which it was constructed

7. Scale and Evaluation in Rating System

The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Average

GIAN JANE QUIǸONES, LPT


Name and Signature of the Validator
Evaluation Form

Content validity tool for semi-structured Questionnaire

The instrument is designed to describe the criteria for the questionnaires evaluation.

Direction: Please put a check on each statement that corresponds to the following point equivalent.

Point Equivalent:

5 – Excellent

4 – Very Good

3 – Good

2 – Fair

1 – Poor

Criteria for Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

1. Clarity of Direction and Items

The questions are presented in a manner that


is clear and comprehensive.

2. Presentations/Organization

The items are organized in logical manner

3. Suitability

The items appropriately represent the


substance of the research. The questions are
designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured

4. Adequateness of Items per Category

The number of questions is enough to answer


the need for research

5. Objectivity

The questions being asked do not suggest bias


on the part of the researcher

6. Attainment of Items per Category

The instrument as a whole fulfils the


objective/goal to which it was constructed

7. Scale and Evaluation in Rating System

The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Average

EDGAR AYON, LPT, MAEd


Name and Signature of the Validator
Evaluation Form

Content validity tool for semi-structured Questionnaire

The instrument is designed to describe the criteria for the questionnaires evaluation.

Direction: Please put a check on each statement that corresponds to the following point equivalent.

Point Equivalent:

5 – Excellent

4 – Very Good

3 – Good

2 – Fair

1 – Poor

Criteria for Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

1. Clarity of Direction and Items

The questions are presented in a manner that


is clear and comprehensive.

2. Presentations/Organization

The items are organized in logical manner

3. Suitability

The items appropriately represent the


substance of the research. The questions are
designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured

4. Adequateness of Items per Category

The number of questions is enough to answer


the need for research

5. Objectivity

The questions being asked do not suggest bias


on the part of the researcher

6. Attainment of Items per Category

The instrument as a whole fulfils the


objective/goal to which it was constructed

7. Scale and Evaluation in Rating System

The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Average

KLOYDE A. CADAY, LPT, MAEd


Name and Signature of the Validator

You might also like