500W, Class E 27.12 MHZ Amplifier Using A Single Plastic Mosfet
500W, Class E 27.12 MHZ Amplifier Using A Single Plastic Mosfet
1 APT9903
500W, Class E 27.12 MHz Amplifier
Using A Single Plastic MOSFET
L1
J2
Q1
L2
J1 C3
T1
C6-C8
C1 R1
Figure 2. SPICE model for ARF448 MOSFET
Figure 1: 27 MHz Class E Amplifier Schematic
High voltage MOSFETs are now available that C1,C3 75-380 pF mica trimmer, ARCO 465
combine the best practices from the RF world with C4-C8 .01 uF 1 kV disc ceramic
the economy of the switchmode devices and C9,C10 .1 uF 500V disc ceramic
packaging. They are available in mirror image pairs L1 6 uH. 25t #24 ga.enam. 0.5" dia.
and the heat spreader of the plastic TO-247 package L2 210 nH. 4t #8 ga. .75" id, 1" long
L4 2t #20 PTFE on .5" ferrite bead µ=850
is connected to the source. They operate up to 300V Q1 APT ARF448A
Vdd, at frequencies up to 100 MHz. R1 25Ω 5W non-inductive
T1 Pri: 4t #20 PTFE, Sec: 1t brass tube
AMPLIFIER DESIGN on 2 hole balun bead
Fair-Rite #2843010302 µ=850
The device used for this amplifier is an APT
Table 1: 27 MHz Class E Amplifier Part Values
ARF448A. It has a BV of 450V and RθJC of 0.55°C/
W. The class C gain is more than 25dB at 27 MHz.
COSS is 125 pF at Vdd=125V. RD(ON) is 0.4Ω. These
data sheet parameters were entered in the HEPA [1]
3 APT9903
Class E design program and it generated starting copper shim stock.
design values for the circuit. The circuit is common
to most Class E amplifiers. [2] See Figure 1. In
Class E amplifiers there is a capacitor shunted across
the drain to source. There is none used here because
the output capacitance of the device is slightly larger
than the optimum value for that component. This
defines the upper frequency limit for efficient Class
E operation of a particular device. The 3Ω ESR of
COSS is one of the primary loss mechanisms in the
circuit. However, COSS exhibits little of the parasitic
inductance that caused VHF ringing in the circuit
described by Davis. The output circuit values were
adjusted slightly for maximum efficiency at an
output power of 490 W but basically, it worked "as
advertised" right off the bat.
APT9903
4
needed to adequately simulate the effects of the current foldback would be needed in the power
nonlinear capacitances of the MOSFET. However, supply of a practicable amplifier.
the SPICE model was very useful for understanding
the gate drive problem mentioned earlier.
90
1000
800
135 45
600
400
200
180 0 0
rel ef f
Figure 3. Drain voltage waveform from HEPA P out
% Id
HEPA assumes that the device is being driven into
-135 -45
saturation, the only input parameter it considers is
input drive power -- used for the overall efficiency
calculation. The gate drive was the biggest problem - 90
in the design because a large RF-capable power Figure 5: Load pull result for 500 W nominal output
MOSFET has a very small input impedance. at 2:1 VSWR. Efficiency is displayed as % x 10.
One of the best tests for reliability of an amplifier is Class E amplifiers are used commercially in RF
mismatch load testing. Called "load pull" in some sources of plasma generators and as exciters for CO2
circles, it is a test which describes what the amplifier lasers. In plasma generator applications it is known
does when operating into a load other than 50 ohms. that the load varies over a particular range. The
The ARF448 has about 175 watts of available feed line length is chosen so the load presented to
dissipation in the test amplifier with its air cooled the amplifier does not enter the +45° quadrant. Other
heat sink. The performance at eight points around a plasma generators have some form of active
2:1 VSWR mismatch circle was calculated using matching network between the amplifier and the
HEPA. Then the same test was run on the amplifier load to handle the load pull issue. The drive or the
itself with the drive duty cycle reduced to 50%. The drain voltage is reduced until a reasonable match is
various loads were obtained using a variable L- achieved. In CO2 lasers, the drive is pulse width
network and adjusting each load impedance with a modulated and under high VSWR conditions, the
vector impedance meter. The differences between pulse width is reduced until the load stabilizes.
the calculated and measured results were very small.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The measured load pull results are shown in Figure
5. The most obvious conclusion is that there is a The efficiency of the Class E amplifier is 13% better
region in the high impedance inductive quadrant that with 30% more output power than was obtained
should be avoided. Protection would be required to from an initial Class C amplifier designed by
keep the transistor within its safe operating area if classical methods using the same components. [5]
operated in this region. The schematic did not change, only the values of
L2 and C3 are different.
Without protection, the output power soared to 750
W and the drain current was almost twice normal. The performance of the amplifier is summarized in
The efficiency stayed quite constant, never losing the table below along with the calculated values from
more than 11% at any load angle. Some form of HEPA. The results are fairly close.
5 APT9903
Clearly, the device is operating somewhere past the
Measured HEPA Units point where C OSS provides the right value for
optimum Class E operation. There are tradeoffs to
RF Output Power 490 494.93 W be made between efficiency and maximum output
Drive Power 10 10 W power. The goal was 500W. 83% was the highest
Drain Voltage 125 125 V efficiency obtainable.
Drain Current 4.72 4.47 A
Peak Drain Voltage 430 410.25 V SUMMARY
Peak Drain Current 27.27 A
Loss in L2 4.2 W This article has presented the design of a 27 MHz
Second Harmonic -24 dB Class E amplifier using a high voltage RF MOSFET.
Third Harmonic -57 dB The initial circuit values were obtained using HEPA,
Drain Efficiency 83 88.45 % a commercial Class E design program. 27 MHz was
chosen because it represents a frequency above that
The drain voltage waveform is shown in Figure 4 deemed optimum for the parameters of the device.
and the gate waveform in Figure 6. The peak drain A comparison of the measured and calculated
voltage measures 430V. The approximately 10 nH performance is presented along with several
of parasitic inductance between the "drain" and the practical design issues and application caveats.
scope probe prohibits a true measurement. This is a
problem similar to that already mentioned for the REFERENCES
gate. It is as high as prudent design will allow. The
achieved efficiency is 5.5% below the model. This [1] N. Sokal, HEPA-PLUS/WB v3.29, Design
could be due to the COSS being higher than the data Automation, Inc., Lexington, MA
sheet value, or its ESR being higher than 3 ohms or [2] J. F. Davis, D. B. Rutledge, "Industrial Class E
the switching times being longer than the values power amplifiers with low-cost power MOSFETs
used, and sine-wave drive" Conference Papers for RF
Design '97, Santa Clara, CA, Sept 1997,pp. 283-
297.
[3] winSMITH 2.0, Noble Publishing Corp., Tucker,
GA
[4] R. Frey, "A Push-Pull 300 Watt Amplifier for
81.36 MHz", Applied Microwave and Wireless, vol.
10 no. 3, pp. 36-45, April 1998
[5] Krauss, Bostian, and Raab, Solid State Radio
Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980
APT9903
6
405 S.W. Columbia Street Parc Cadera Nord - Av. Kennedy BAT B4
Bend, Oregon 97702 USA 33700 Merignac, France
Phone: (541) 382-8028 Phone: 33-556 34 34 71
Fax: (541) 388-0364 Fax: 33-556 47 97 61