Abcd Reflection
Abcd Reflection
Adrian Medina
Prof. Miller
29 March 2020
ABCD Reflection
While being in my position as an intern at Misericordia, I’ve grappled with what ideals
the leadership there was operating with. Although I cannot speak on what the organization does
in its entirety, I can speak on the leadership of the Personal Effectiveness Program within
Misericordia especially after interviewing the director about what her ideals and priorities as a
leader are. I have gotten the opportunity to analyze how the specific department of Misericordia
operates in terms of how they base approaches with residents on both their strengths as well as
the structure in the microcosm that is encapsulated within the Misericordia’s vast campus. I have
also gotten to reflect on how what I’ve learned has impacted how I may emphasize assets and
Misericordia has upkept its commitment to the residents that have gotten as far as
growing up within its facilities in that they are all treated as functional individuals as well as
being met with an approach that values their humanity. Utilizing the components set by the asset-
based community development (ABCD) model, Misericordia has tactfully benefited from
intangible assets, individuals, institutions, and physical space. The organization has and
continues to appreciate the diversity in its staff and its residents; the culture of the organization is
one that embraces everyone, being inclusive of their ability and experience. During my time in
the facility, I have gotten to see first-hand how diverse the workforce is there as well as how the
Medina 2
diversity translates in a multitude of unique approaches used to engage the residents—each being
beneficial in very different ways. This also ties into the component of the individual, with respect
to the ABCD model, because Misericordia is home to an expansive population of staff, both in
literal numbers as well as experience. All of the staff is always prepared, and actually encourage
one another to work collectively in assisting residence. Their ability to organize and adapt
quickly makes them a tremendous asset to the community of residents in Misericordia; I could
see this drive for collective action during my time in PEP. All of the staff were always very
cooperative with one another when coordinating tasks, and they were all even more flexible
when having to re-coordinate plans based on needs. I can also see how they value the individual
residents themselves because they are the reason why staff look forward to coming into work;
the residents are valued for their person, and staff work hard to emphasize their strengths, so the
residents are always conscious of how wonderful they actually are. Misericordia makes great use
of Loyola University Chicago, as an institution, when it comes to obtaining new interns and new
volunteers that all help drive various programming across its campus. The university being the
asset because it provides the organization with individuals who are passionate about service,
which is critical in trying to establish positive change for those that live with disabilities. Lastly,
when it comes to navigating the vast asset of physical space in Misericordia’s campus, I’d say
they do well in utilizing their ample spaces to coordinate multiple programs, activities, etc. An
example is creating schedules for individual residents that make use of several facilities in a
single day, e.g. working out, swimming, etc., so the residents are able to feel fulfilled in their
When placing into consideration the deficits that require attention, Misericordia must
keep close tabs on the limits of every resident, staff and intern. It is critical, per the nature of the
Medina 3
work, that everyone is aware of what our limits are for the sake of every single person’s safety
and overall wellbeing. This can be something ranging from knowing someone’s capacity for
physical strength to knowing someone’s intellectual capabilities. These are all some of the
factors that go into specific vocational and occupational training for residents on behalf of the
environment in it can focus on both the assets and limits of everyone involved in its several parts.
The deficits are noted more individualistically to assure that proper needs are being met, which is
really an advocate-based approach when it comes to working with individuals with disabilities.
Assets are assessed in order to provide ample opportunities for engagement for the residents and
staff. An example that comes to mind is how a daily routine looks like in PEP because working
with each resident is unique to them based on their limits and abilities; however, we still utilize
multiple break-out spaces to accommodate everyone’s needs and offer them opportunities to
of assets and deficits in a health service field as an aspiring health professional. I have gotten to
understand that, in cases of vulnerable populations, one must always consider both for the overall
betterment of the individuals one is trying to work with. In the case of my internship, I have done
so in working one-on-one with specific residents, who all have very distinct diagnoses, when
trying to establish what are ideal tasks are when considering improving specific vocational
abilities. I have to assess what their strengths are, both physically and mentally, as well as
looking at where their limits lie just because I want to facilitate a schedule that is conducive to
their sense of achievement. Out of this understanding, an appreciation for this type of analysis
Medina 4
has grown because I fully intend to be working with vulnerable populations once I am given the
I think that my internship is providing me with very useful information when it comes to
community development because the community I work with is often overlooked across several
dimensions of life. Many in the disabled community are not able to voice their concerns that may
reach larger platforms as a result of various barriers, e.g. made to be a novelty, intellectual
impediments, etc. I believe that I have gotten the unique opportunity to really explore an active
community that exists in its own bubble, which means residents are able to flourish in this
environment because they are offered consistency and comfort. Something that I would
challenge Misericordia in doing is allowing for more opportunities to engage with the
community outside its facilities because one cannot have genuine community development if the
community solely exists in a microcosm that essentially stagnates as time passes. I will also say,
though, that it may take a more analytical view to really understand concepts that facilitate
community development in this organization because many are quick to take this type of work at
face value. I’d urge the organization to make it clear how differences are being made and why
it’s important that positions be taken seriously. Those would be my largest critiques, otherwise, I
think that the organization has done a terrific job at providing me with very valuable information