Drug Regulation: SVKM'S Nmims Mba-Pharmaceutical Management
Drug Regulation: SVKM'S Nmims Mba-Pharmaceutical Management
DRUG REGULATION
WHY DRUG IS REGULATED?
Drugs are substances specifically recognised by an official Pharmacopeia and Formulary that are
approved for use to treat, diagnose, cure or prevent a disease or disorder. A medical substance
induces change to the function or structure of the patient’s body.
The regulation of drugs and medicine is crucial to the health and safety of the public. Ensuring
that a medicine is high quality is achieved by checking the efficacy, quality and safety of the
drug. The medicines are prepared, stored, manufactured and shipped according to health and
safety guidelines of professional and experienced chemists and pharmacists. The FDA (Food and
Drug Administration) and other health governing authorities prohibit illegal and unethical
production of drugs.
Regulation is important and followed continuously in every step and process that the drug
material passes through. These steps include: raw material handling, formula applications, lot
number maintenance, humidity, light and temperature control, storage, special packs for
sensitive drugs, SOPs for drug movement, refrigerator usage, legal documents and records,
shipping and handling, all of which are necessary for proper drug maintenance and for the safety
and health of the consumer.
Regulations for drugs should be under the control of the authorities. The national government
may be responsible for activating the national medical regulatory board, which is represented by
medical regulatory authorities (MRAs). The regulatory bodies are responsible for the ensuring
that all medicine production complies with the rules and regulations and ethical behavior
guidelines outlined by the local and international bodies. Decisions made by the authorities
should be clear and transparent; they should be made in compliance with the rules and
regulations to ensure the prosperity of the country.
On December 12, 2014, the Department of Pharmaceuticals (DoP) of the Government of India
announced details of the ‘Uniform Code of Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (UCPMP)’, which
would be effective across the country from January 1, 2015.
Just to recapitulate, the DoP came out with a draft UCPMP on March 19, 2012, inviting
stakeholders’ comments. Immediately thereafter, the officials at the highest level of the
department held several discussions on that draft with the constituents of the pharmaceutical
industry, Ministry of Health, Medical Council of India (MCI), besides other stakeholders.
Unfortunately, no decision on the subject was taken for nearly three years since then, probably
due to intense lobbying by interested constituents.
General Points
I. A drug must not be promoted prior to receipt of the marketing approval by the
competent authority, authorizing its sale or supply.
II. The promotion of a drug must be consistent with the terms of the marketing approval.
III. Information about drugs must be up-to-date, verifiable and accurately reflect current
knowledge or responsible opinion.
IV. Information about drugs must be accurate, balanced, fair, objective, and must not
mislead either directly or by implication.
V. Information must be capable of substantiation. Substantiation that is requested pursuant
to para 1.5 above must be provided without delay at the request of members of the
medical and pharmacy professions including the members of those professions
employed in the pharmaceutical industry.
IV. A pharmaceutical company shall not supply a sample of a drug which is an anti-
depressant, hypnotic, sedative or tranquillizer.
V. The companies will maintain details, such as product name, doctor name, Quantity of
samples given, Date of supply of free samples distributed to Healthcare practitioners etc.
Hospitality: Companies or their associations/representatives shall not extend any hospitality like
hotel accommodation to Healthcare Practitioners and their family members under any pretext.
Cash or monetary grants: Companies or their associations/representatives shall not pay any cash
or monetary grants to any healthcare professional for individual purpose in individual capacity
under any pretext. Funding for medical research, study etc., can only be extended through
approved institutions by modalities laid down by law/rules/guidelines adopted by such approved
institutions, in a transparent manner. It shall always be fully disclosed.
Where there is any item missing, the code of MCI as per "Indian Medical Council (Professional
Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulation, 2002 as amended from time to time, will prevail.
PENALTY PROVISIONS
Once it is established that a breach of code has been made by a company, the committee
can propose one of the following decisions against the alleged company to the Head of the
Association for action:
I. To suspend or expel the company from the Association.
II. To reprimand the company and publish details of that reprimand.
III. To require the company to issue a corrective statement in the media (covering all media)
which was used to issue promotional material textual & audio visual; details of the
ANALYSIS
A survey report of Ernst and Young titled, “Pharmaceutical marketing: ethical and responsible
conduct”, carried on the UCPMP and MCI guidelines, highlighted some of the following points:
a) More than 50 percent of the respondents are of the opinion that the UCPMP may lead
to manipulation in recording of actual sampling activity.
b) Over 50 percent of the respondents indicated that the effectiveness of the code would
be very low in the absence of legislative support provided to the UCPMP committee.
c) 90 percent of the respondents felt that pharma companies in India should focus on
building a robust internal controls system to ensure compliance with the UCPMP.
d) 72 percent of the respondents felt that the MCI was not stringently enforcing its medical
ethics guidelines.
e) Just 36 percent of the respondents felt that the MCI’s guidelines would have an impact
on the overall sales of pharma companies.
Let me now get back to the UCPMP. As mentioned in the draft proposal of 2012, after six
months from the date of its coming into effect, the government would review the quality of
implementation of the UCPMP by the pharma players and their trade associations. If the same
is found unsatisfactory, the DoP may consider a statutory code, thereafter.
Interestingly, nothing has been mentioned in the UCPMP document about the process that
would be followed by the government to assess the quality of implementation of the Code after
six months prompting the DoP to take a very crucial decision, either way.
The UCPMP of the DoP states, the Managing Director/CEO of the company is ultimately
responsible for ensuring the adherence to the code and the executive head of the company
should submit a self-declaration within two months from the date of issue of UCPMP.
Thereafter, within two months of the end of every financial year, the declaration needs to be
submitted to the respective industry associations for uploading those on the Associations’
websites. These declarations must also be uploaded on the website of the respective
companies.
As we know, there are several thousands of pharma marketing players in India. Many of these
players, especially those in the micro and small-scale sectors, including their trade associations,
do not maintain websites either. Thus, it would be interesting to know how does the DoP
monitor such declarations bi-monthly in the six months’ time, to start with.
There are no strong deterrent measures in the UCPMP to minimize flouting of the code, nor
would the complaint filing process encourage any victim with relevant details, such as patients,
to lodge a complaint after paying non-refundable Rs.1, 000. It is beyond an iota of doubt that
patients are the ultimate victims of most of sales and marketing malpractices by the pharma
players.
Moreover, this non-refundable money would ultimately go to whom and how would it be used
are still unclear.
CONCLUSION:
December 12, 2014 announcement of the UCPMP in its self-regulatory mode sends a message
of good intent of the government to curb pharma marketing malpractices in India, which are
threats to the society.
However, I reckon, the document is rather weak in its effective implementation potential.
Meaningful and transparent deterrent measures to uphold public health interest are also
lacking. The entire process also deserves a well-structured monitoring mechanism and digital
implementation tools that can be operated with military precision.
References:
https://pharmaceuticals.gov.in/sites/default/files/Uniform%20Code%20of
%20Pharmaceuticals.pdf
http://www.tapanray.in/indias-pharma-marketing-code-ucpmp-is-it-crafted-well-enough-to-
deliver-the-deliverables/
https://www.insightsonindia.com/2020/02/07/uniform-code-of-pharmaceuticals-marketing-
practices-ucpmp-code/
http://www.nishithdesai.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Research_Papers/Uniform-Code-
for-Pharmaceutical-Marketing-Practices_Decoded.pdf