Transactional Analysis (TA) : 1. Ego States
Transactional Analysis (TA) : 1. Ego States
Transactional Analysis is a theory developed by Dr. Eric Berne in the 1950s. Transactional Analysis is
a social psychology and a method to improve communication. The theory outlines how we have
developed and treat ourselves, how we relate and communicate with others, and offers suggestions
and interventions which will enable us to change and grow. Transactional Analysis is underpinned by
the philosophy that:
Transactional Analysis (TA) is a personality and psychotherapy for personal growth. It has wide
applications in Clinical Psychology, organisations and education also. Dr.Eric Berne, the originator of
TA, considers a transaction as the unit of social intercourse. A transaction consists of a transactional
stimulus (TS) and a transactional response (TR). TS is the behaviour (verbal or nonverbal) produced
by one person in acknowledgement of the presence of others when two or more people encounter
each other. TR is the response to TS by another person.
It is beneficial to study TA as it has received great popularity and a wide appeal because on a well
developed psychoanalytical theoretical base and it uses very simple, understandable, everyday
terminology.
1. Ego States:
It represents a person’s way of thinking, feeling and behaving. There
are three ego states present in everyone: child, parent and adult.
They are related to behaviour of a person and not his age. However,
they are present in every person in varying degrees. There may be
more of one ego state than another at a specific point of time. When
two persons communicate with each other, communication is
affected by their ego states. These are;
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(a) Child ego:
Child behaviour reflects a person’s response to communicate in the
form of joy, sorrow, frustration or curiosity. These are the natural
feelings that people learn as children. It reflects immediate action
and immediate satisfaction. It reflects childhood experience of a
person gained generally up to the age of five years.
(ii) Adaptive child:
He reacts the way his parents want him to react. He is trained to act.
(iii)Rebellious child:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(c) Adult ego:
Adult behaviour reflects the ability to analyse the situation and take
logical decisions. He overcomes the emotional feelings and takes
decisions based on facts and figures. This state is based upon
reasoning, thinking, experience, rationality and discussion based on
facts.
It updates the parental ego to determine what is right and wrong
and child ego to determine what feelings to express and what not to
express. These ego states are present in all human beings at some
time or the other. People respond to different situations in different
ways depending on their ego state.
2. Life Position:
Behaviour of a person depends upon his experience at different
stages of his life. He develops a philosophy towards work from early
childhood which becomes part of his identity and remains with him
for lifetime unless some external factor changes it. These positions
are called life time positions.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
Managers with this life position are usually not good managers.
They do not perform well, have an erratic behaviour, feel guilty for
their acts and often use excuses to act against others.
3. Analysis of Transactions:
When two persons interact or communicate with each other, there
is a transaction between them. While transacting, both of them are
at different ego states.
(b) Crossed.
People get expected response from each other because both are in
the expected ego states. Both are, therefore, satisfied and
communication is complete. In complementary transactions, ego
states of two persons are parallel to each other. Stimulus and
response patterns are as predicted.
When parent ego of manager talks to child ego of the worker and
child ego of the worker talks back to parent ego of the manager,
communication is effective but where egos get crossed,
communication breakdown takes place. The above interaction
between manager and worker would have been effective if the
worker had said, “I am sorry sir, I’ll take care not to behave like this
again.”