Fragmented Contract Management: Challenges, Impacts and Solutions
Fragmented Contract Management: Challenges, Impacts and Solutions
Contract
Management:
Challenges, Impacts
and Solutions
Introduction
Contracts form the foundation of commerce, governing every dollar in
and out of an enterprise. Yet contracting at many companies remains
siloed by department and geography, exposing companies to contract
delays, compliance risk and poor commercial outcomes.
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“Our contract management
knowledge walks out the
• No system to capture IMPACTS door at 5 p.m. every day.”
institutional knowledge
from subject matter experts
• Weaker negotiation “We know some contract
• Communication about
contracts occurs in silos, positions with management teams have
counterparties
with no ability to access better outcomes than
information in the future • Weaker contract others. But we don’t
when questions arise management teams know why.”
• Limited institutional • Delayed contract
emphasis on the cycles as information
importance of contract
“At the negotiation table, it
is gathered
management knowledge feels like the other side is
• Time and resources holding all the cards.”
wasted recreating
contracting best
practices
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“Every team has a different
definition of what good
• Contract managers not IMPACTS contract management
consulted in strategy
phase of business looks like.”
• Poor onboarding of • Cost and risk exposure
new staff on contract “I don’t know who to go
• Time wasted on
management practices ineffective onboarding to for insight into what our
• Unclear job definition and and training contract best practices are.”
progression paths for • Highly inconsistent
contract managers contract outcomes
• Lack of cross-functional • Importance of
definition of contract contracting devalued
management excellence across the enterprise
• Fragmented contract
management leadership
CAUSES
“When it comes to
contracts, our right hand
• Functional silos within IMPACTS doesn’t know what the left
departments (e.g.,
procurement doesn’t work hand’s doing.”
with contract managers) • Contracting processes
• Poor documentation of
and contracts that “After negotiating a deal
don’t align with broader
contract management we have to start over to
business goals
workflows and best practices write the contract.”
• A lack of continuous
• No system to capture
improvement in how
institutional knowledge on “Even when we get a
contracts are drafted,
contracting and
contract management reviewed and executed contract right, we’re back
• Contracts reviewed
to square one with the
• Undervaluation of contract
without adequate context next one.”
management as a
business-critical function • No data-driven
improvements in contract
• Lack of data on contract
management
outcomes
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“I know our company has
best practices for contract
• No governance IMPACTS management. I don’t know
framework to reinforce
established contract what they are.”
management process • Inconsistent use of
• No visibility into contract
value levers “When a contract comes
management processes • High volume of across my desk, there is
across departments change orders no way for me to know
or geographies
• High risk exposure whether it’s been reviewed
• Poor education on by the right people.”
established process • Inability to drive
continuous
• Processes designed and improvements in
improved in silos contracting
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“We have so many
templates in use it’s hard to
• No enterprise-wide IMPACTS call them ‘templates.’ ”
repository of approved
templates and clauses
• Proliferation of templates “We know we have
• No system for surfacing
necessary clauses based
and clauses, slowing contracts that don’t
down legal review
on contract conditions comply with our standards.
(geography, deal size, etc.) • Slow contract authoring But we can’t do anything
• Contracts originate on • Unnecessary use of time about it.”
hard-drives, obscuring and negotiation capital
legal line-of-site on clauses that don’t
impact business outcome
• Legacy agreements that
do not include the latest • Exposure to risk due to
legal and regulatory improper contract usage
clauses or have extraneous
language unnecessary for
the business at hand
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“Our legal department
takes forever reviewing
• No standardized system IMPACTS third-party contracts. It
for intaking legacy and
third-party contracts and hurts business.”
matching them to internal, • Third-party contracts carry
approved clauses extra risk for organization “When emails start going
• Email-based redlining • Redlines difficult to track back and forth, what’s
workflow and interpret changed in a contract
• Lack of fallback clauses to • Negotiations delayed when becomes impossible
be used during negotiations nonstandard clauses to track.”
are encountered
• Inability to efficiently extract
metadata from third-party “Our contract process is
contracts
too rigid and doesn’t allow
us to stay agile.”
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“I don’t know where my
contracts are or what
• Non-digitized contracts IMPACTS they say.”
make it impossible to
extract expiry dates,
SLAs, obligations and • Time and capacity drain “We’re missing obligations
other milestones from the in collecting and collating
contract documents
we don’t even know we’ve
contract milestones
committed to.”
• Contracts not stored • Missed rebates and
centrally, obscuring single threshold savings
view of all contract risk
and opportunity • Missed obligations
resulting in fines and
• Extracting contract penalties for failure to
data requires slow, deliver on commitments
manual effort
• Rushed sourcing and
sales events with weaker
negotiation stances
• Poor compliance
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“It’s impossible for us to get
a global view of who we’re
• Contract data locked IMPACTS doing business with.”
in paper or dense
legal copy
• Time and capacity drain “Every term and condition
• Lack of systems to
connect invoices to in collecting and collating we put in a contract
contract data
contracts needs to be manually
• Highly manual systems • Supplier overbilling or brought over to our spend
customer underbilling management system.”
for collecting data and
making it usable and • Misprioritized efforts
meaningful
“We don’t have the agility
• Incumbent suppliers and
• No automated transfer customers advantaged to switch suppliers even
of data from RFQ/ in negotiations when it’s right for
proposal phase to
contracting phase the business.”
during deals
I N T H E I R OW N WO R DS
CAUSES
“Our contracts get filed away
as soon as they are signed,
• Contract clauses not IMPACTS never to be seen again until
linked to systems to
intake performance data there is a problem.”
• Unidentified sources of cost
• End users not granted
and risk exposure “When contracts are up
access to performance
data for security concerns • Poor supplier and for renewals, we have no
• Performance data commercial performance data to look at to measure
sourced directly from • Contracts requiring how well the previous
contract counterparties, renegotiation due to contract performed.”
not internal systems insufficient terms
• Ill-defined or generic • Drawn-out contract disputes “We have to rely on the word
KPIs in contracts make with little data to refer to of our suppliers that they are
it impossible to truly
measure contract efficacy • Weakened negotiation posture fulfilling contracts—and not
the contract itself.”
Co
ce
rm ct
enforce provisions outside
ntr
an
rfo tra
Exe t Stra
context of business needs
ac
Pe on
cut tegy
C
e
Contract Contract
PROCESS | Poor internal and Performance Creation
external collaboration delays
execution PROCESS | Contract requirements
sal
Co cutio
Exe
po
PEOPLE | Poor controls around
ntr
Pro
the ‘right’ person seeing each TECH | Past contract data not
act
Q/
contract before execution surfaced during RFQ/proposal event
n
RF
C
Ne ontra t
go c trac
tia t
tio Con fting
n D ra
PROCESS | Lack of integration
CONTENT | Redlines and leads to data loss from RFQ stage
third-party clauses difficult to CONTENT | Clauses and
track; fall-back clause unavailable templates pertinent to business
when needed needs unavailable to contract team
We don’t have a system Even within departments, We don’t have an We don’t have the
to capture institutional contract managers enterprise-wide ability to automatically
knowledge from don’t work closely with repository for approved extract contract data
subject matter experts business partners templates and clauses
Our contract
There is limited We don’t document We have to manually management data does
institutional emphasis contract management insert clauses based on not flow into other
on the importance of workflows contract conditions systems
contract management
We don’t collect data Most contracts are Our contract
Our contract managers on contract outcomes drafted on local PCs, management does not
are not consulted during with no enterprise intake data from other
strategy sessions We don’t reinforce visibility systems
contract management
Our contract managers processes with a clear Contract templates We do not have
don’t have a clear governance framework commonly include contract management
career path extraneous clauses data to measure
Contract management performance
Different departments processes are defined We don’t have well-
have different ideas and improved defined fall-back We rely on contract
of what contract within silos clauses for use during counterparties to
management best negotiations provide performance
practices are data rather than
internal systems
PEOPLE
PROCESS
REQUIREMENT 2
Contract processes should be tailored
CO N T R AC T P O L I CY based on type of contact, value of
AND PROCESS FOR contract, terms of contract, risk category
C O N T R A C T M E TA D ATA or contract, geography/governing law, and
DOCUMENTED preferred counterparty classification.
CONTENT
TECH
TECH
icertis.com/contact
Icertis, the leading enterprise contract management platform in the cloud, solves the hardest contract management problems on the easiest to use platform. With Icertis,
companies accelerate their business by increasing contract velocity, protect against risk by ensuring regulatory and policy compliance, and optimize their commercial
relationships by maximizing revenue and reducing costs. The AI-infused Icertis Contract Management (ICM) platform is used by companies like 3M, Airbus, Cognizant,
Daimler, Microsoft and Sanofi to manage 6.5 million contracts in 40+ languages across 90+ countries. For more information visit icertis.com.