0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views

Contract Project. AMARTYA

1) A wagering contract is an agreement between two parties where one party promises to pay the other a certain sum of money depending on whether an uncertain future event occurs or not. 2) Under Indian law, wagering contracts are considered void as they involve gambling. Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act states that agreements by way of wager are void and no suit can be brought to recover anything won from a wager. 3) There are different types of wagers including moneyline betting, spread betting, over/under betting, and prop betting which involve betting on the outcome of sports or other events beyond a party's control.

Uploaded by

Shivam Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views

Contract Project. AMARTYA

1) A wagering contract is an agreement between two parties where one party promises to pay the other a certain sum of money depending on whether an uncertain future event occurs or not. 2) Under Indian law, wagering contracts are considered void as they involve gambling. Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act states that agreements by way of wager are void and no suit can be brought to recover anything won from a wager. 3) There are different types of wagers including moneyline betting, spread betting, over/under betting, and prop betting which involve betting on the outcome of sports or other events beyond a party's control.

Uploaded by

Shivam Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

1

INTRODUCTION
.
A contract is a voluntary, deliberate, and a legally binding agreement between two or
more parties. Contracts in the general sense are usually written but they can be
spoken or implied on the mutual consent of both the parties and are generally related
to lease, rent, sale or employment. Under Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act,
1872 the term Contract has been specifically defined as an agreement which is
enforceable by law. Thus, it implies that an agreement which is enforceable by law is
a contract. A contract is a legal way of performing activities between two parties and
making sure that neither of the party at any point of time while in the performance of
the contract backs out or otherwise the other party can sue him in the court of law for
the breach of Contract. The contract made between any two parties should be made
in a proper manner and should have the following essentials in it to be called as a
valid contract which has been defined under the section 10 of the Indian Contract
Law,1872 -

● ”All Agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the
parties, competent to contract for a lawful consideration and with a lawful
object and are not hereby expressly declared to be void”.

ESSENTIALS OF A VALID CONTRACT:

1. Offer and Acceptance


2 .Legal intention and relationship of parties
3 .Lawful consideration
4 .Lawful object
5. Possibility of performance
6. Free consent
7. Certainty
2

WHAT IS A WAGERING CONTRACT?

When we talk about contracts we come across various types and kinds of contracts such as
Quasi-contracts, Implied contracts, Expressed contracts and many more. One such type of
contract is known as Wagering Contract. Wagering Contract is one in which there are two
necessary parties between which the contract has been made and wherein, the first party
promises to pay a certain sum of money to the second party on the happening of a particular
event in the future and the second party agrees to pay to the first party on not happening of
that particular event. The basic fundamental of a wagering agreement is the presence of two
parties who are of sound mind to get profit or loss. A Wager in the common language means
Betting or Gambling. The basic meaning of the term wager is betting. Section 30 of the
Indian Contract Act specifically talks about agreements by way of wager, as void. The
section read as follows:

“Agreements by way of wager are void and no suit shall be brought for recovering anything
alleged to be won on any wager, or entrusted to any person to abide the result of any game
or other uncertain events on which any wager is made.”

CASE LAW

Carlill V. Carbolic Smoke Ball co.(1893): This is the only case law which has defined
a wagering contract in the most expressive and encompassing way. It States as
follows:

”One by which two persons, professing to hold opposite views touching the issue of
a future uncertain event, mutually agree that, dependant on the determination of that
event, one shall win from the other, and that other shall pay or hand over to him, a
sum of money or other stake; neither of the parties having any other interest in that
contract than the sum or stake he will win or lose, there is no other consideration for
making of such contract by either of the parties. If either of the parties may win but
cannot lose or may lose but cannot win, it is not a wagering contract”.
Thus, it can be stated that all wagering agreements are contingent agreements but
all contingent agreements are not wagering agreements. Thus in the simple
language, we can understand that a wagering contract is a futuristic contract which is
based upon the happening of a certain event in the future. A wagering contract may
or may not be imposed depending upon the circumstances in the future.

Also in the case of Chimanlal Purshottamdas Shah vs Nyamatrai Madhavlal

A new dimension was given to the term Wager which follows,” The essence of
Gambling and Wagering is that one party is to win and the other to lose upon a
future event which, at the time on track, is of an uncertain nature- that is to say, if the
event turns our own way, A will lose; but if it turns out the other way, he will win”.
3

This was also seen in the case of Badridas Kothari v.


Meghraj Kothario the court held that although a promissory note was executed for
the payment of the debt caused through wagering transaction, the note was not held
enforceable. Thus, the winner cannot recover the money, but before it is paid to him
the depositor recover from the stakeholder. Also, it was also seen in the case of
Gherulal Parekh v. Mahadeo Das 1959 AIR 781 the honorable supreme court in its
judgment said that although a wager is not unlawful under Section 23 of the Indian
Contract Act and thus all the proceedings and transactions collateral to the main
transaction are as such enforceable

HISTORY OF LAW RELATED TO THE CONCEPT OF WAGER:

Since the primitive times when there were cases in British India, the law that related
to the wagers was the common law in England governed it but then in 1848, the
Wagers Avoiding Act came into force. Earlier, it was regarded that any action of the
wager may be maintained if it was not against the personal feelings of the third
person with evidence and that it was in contradiction to the public policy. When we
discuss the concept of gambling and betting we know that this kind of activities
existed in our country from the olden ages which were not adopted in England and
were boycotted. These types of activities have not been specifically mentioned under
the Indian Contract Act or the Hindu law in general and thus these type of activities
are considered as illegal and are not been protected under the ambit of our Indian
constitution under Article 19 or Article 301.

TYPES OF WAGER:
I. Moneyline Betting:
This type of betting is one of the easiest types of betting. Betting through money line
is very simple as it is done only on sports competitions and games and it is totally
based upon the outcome/result of the match. This type of betting is illegal and this
type of activity has been mostly seen in cricket that to the highest in the Indian
Premier League.

II. Spread Betting:


This type of wager/ betting takes place where the person who is placing the bet on
the most favored team playing in the match to win the match by a certain margin or
on the team which is regarded as the underdog for it to win or even if it loses then
with a very close margin.
4

III. Over Betting:


This type of betting is done in the game where the better places his bet on the total
of number score or total of goals scored by both the teams through a combination of
the certain number and which is totally a futuristic event uncertain and nobody has
control over it.

IV. Under Betting:


This type of betting takes place when the better places his bet on the condition that
the combination of the total number of goals and pints that are scored by both the
teams will be less or under a certain limit. This type of wager is also related to the
final outcome of the game.

V. Prop Betting:
This type of betting is very unique and creative in nature as it is not related to the
final result of the game. In this case, the better places his bet on something like the
first half of the game or like whether there will be a super over in a cricket game etc.
thus, this is also known as prop betting.

ESSENTIALS OF A WAGERING CONTRACT:

1. Equal opportunity:

One of the main points in a wagering contract is that there should be an equal
chance for both to either win or lose depending upon the outcome of the future
event.

2. Uncontrollable:
These events are futuristic which may or may not take place and it should be beyond
the control of either of the party because if either of the party has control over it then
it would not amount to wager.

3. No outside Interest:
Both the parties should have a single interest as to the profit or loss in the result of
the event and there should not be any outside or personal interest attached with the
uncertain event as that will not amount to wager as well.

4. Dependency:
The wager agreement is fully dependent upon the happening of the futuristic event
whether it is contrasted with the past, present or future as to the result of that event.
5

5. Promise:

The wager contract should contain an important clause which should state that the
parties promise to pay the money or money’s worth to the other party on the
happening of the event and this should be agreed upon by both the parties.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WAGER AGREEMENT AND CONTINGENT


CONTRACT:

WAGER CONTRACT CONTINGENT CONTRACT


1) All wager contracts are void. 1) Contingent contracts are not void.
2) Wager contracts come under the ambit of Contingent contracts and thus is a
narrow concept. 2) These contracts cover the concept
Of wager contracts and is a wider
concept.

3) The happening of the uncertain event is the sole condition of the wagering
contract.

3) The happening of the event is not the sole condition of the contingent
contracts.
4) The parties have only one interest in the contract i.e. the winning or losing
depending upon the outcome. 4) The parties have their personal and other
motives attached to the contract except for the profit or loss.
5) The parties are required to keep mutual promise under the rules of the wagering
contract. 5) The parties are not required to keep mutual promises under the
contract.

CAN A WAGERING CONTRACT BE ENFORCED?

The Effects and Enforceability of a wagering contract can be understood by the


concept that under the Indian Contract Act it has been explicitly declared as a void
ab initio and thus even section 65 of the Indian Contract Act does not apply to it as
the contract is void but there is nowhere mentioned that these type of contracts have
been forbidden by the law, which again implies that except the state of Gujarat and
Maharashtra the wagering contracts are void and are legal in the other states. Thus,
these agreements by way of wager are void and thus no suit can be brought for
recovering anything alleged to be won on any wager or entrusted to any person to
abide by the result of any game or any other such uncertain event on which any
wager is made.
6

EXCEPTIONS TO THE WAGER AGREEMENT:

As per the Indian Contract Act Section 30 states that there are also certain
exceptions in the wagering agreements and thus the section read as follows:

“This section shall not be deemed to render unlawful a subscription or contribution,


made or entered to into for or towards any plate, prize or sum of money, of the value
or amount of five hundred rupees or more, to be awarded to the winner of any horse
race. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to legalize any transaction connected
with horse- racing, to which the provisions of section 294A of the Indian Penal Code
shall apply”. (see more)

Since a wagering contract is a void contract, thus there are certain exemptions to it
which are as follows:

1. Showcase of talent is not a wager:


Using your talent or skill in front of people in some competition will not amount to
wager (such as sports competitions, puzzles etc), but there is a winning the prize
depend upon mere possibility then it will amount to wager. In the eyes of law prize
competitions do not amount to wager but if the amount is not reasonable then it
would amount to gambling and it will automatically become void.

2. Share Market:
The transactions that take place under the share market shall not amount to wager
where the shares are bought and sold and mere delivery of shares from one person
to another will not be regarded as the wager.

3. Horse race competition:


Sometimes, the state government may authorize certain horse race competition if
the local laws permit it and if the people contribute with a sum of RS 500 or more
towards the prize money which is to be given to the winner of the horse race then it
will not consider a wager.

4. Insurance Contracts:
The contracts of insurance are not wagering at all because these are contracts of
Indemnity. These contracts are entered upon to safeguard and protect the interest of
one party from any damage hence it is not a wager.

5. Commercial transactions:
The Agreements that are done for sale and purchase of any commodity that is to be
used on a commercial base in which there is genuine intention to do legitimate
businesses which are valid and if they intend to do so they are required to pay the
difference.
7

CONCLUSION:

Under Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act, the term Wager has not been defined
and it does not even define about wager agreement it only says that such
agreements are void with the provision of section 294A of the Indian Penal Code.
The Indian lawmakers have never made any amendments in this section to define
such terms ever since this law came into force and up till now, the section is silent on
many things which are necessary to be defined specifically. So, we can only wait for
the lawmakers to amend the following section and break the ambiguity on many
things which have caused a lot of problems for the judiciary to decide many cases in
the past. Thus, it seems a matter of urgent importance to bring the necessary
amendments in the act.

REFERENCES:
Bare Act
Dr. R.K. BANGIA
AVATAR SINGH
Wikipedia
www.scribd.in
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/447653/
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1295756/
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/786123/
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/930662/
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/399853/
8

ABSTRACT

In this project, I have discussed briefly the definition of wagering agreements its
essential features and its exception. I have also mentioned the history and evolution
wagering agreement concept. The main motto of writing this project is to make you
all aware about vagueness that section 30 of Indian contract act has and hoe it can
be removed and to back up my logic I have referred to various case laws for
substantiating my points. so the main crux of my project is that section 30 Indian
contract act is not clear in itself and therefore it must be amended in order to remove
its vagueness.

You might also like