Summative Evaluation

For

5th Grade Math: Multiplying and Dividing Decimals

Jana Jordan

https://sites.google.com/s/1a-

H1DKyawkiM1RSmyNV97_vvfIbs4j3x/p/1GU5VNAAND__utrJpkCQTBJ31dV2Yt68

N/edit
I. Instructional Objectives

A. Students will be able to correctly multiply 3-digit by 2-digit decimal

numbers to find the product.

B. Students will be able to correctly divide 3-digit by 2-digit decimal

numbers to find the dividend.

C. Students will be able to create real world mathematical problems.

II. Descriptions of Assessments

A. Discussion Posts: Using the standard objectives in 5.NBT.7 and content

curation resources, these posts or “exit tickets” were created. A total of

four discussion posts were created via social media sites, Twitter and

Edublogs. Students were to show what they had learned through a visual

or written discussion response. All posts were graded on a 100% grading

scale. On Twitter, there were two questions on multiplication and division

with decimals. One of the Tweets asked students to find the missing factor

of 8 X _____=108. The twist was that students couldn’t solve by dividing.

They were told to use the guess and check problem solving strategy.

Students were asked to tweet their guesses and the hashtag #nailed it with

the correct missing factor. The next discussion tweet asked students to

create a real world example of a division with decimals word problem that

their classmates must solve. Upon posting, students were required to show

their work. Students were asked to retweet the classmate’s tweet they

solved and the hashtag #nailedit with the correct answer. There was a
 slight variation in the Edublog discussion site. Students were expected to

first review the multiplication and division resources located on the left

panel of the EduBlogs site. Then, students were to respond to both

discussions. The first discussion required students to explain using a visual

as to why an answer to a multiplication with decimals problem was not

solved correctly. On the second discussion posts students were to watch

the video tutorial from Khan Academy and then respond to the question

“What would you do if the problem you are solving has a remainder?”

Students were to solve 8 divided by 5.005 and show their work. Then,

create a division with decimals problem for their classmates to solve.

B. Quizzes: The quizzes created were based on the standard objectives,once

students had completed the content module. There were a total of two

quizzes available and each were graded based on a 100% grading scale.

Google Forms was the first quiz students needed to take on the module.

They first watched an instructional video and then completed the 5

question multiple choice quiz. The website GoConqr was used to create

the second quiz for students. It was a 10 question multiple choice

assessment.

C. Unit Project: The unit project was designed based on the 5th Grade

Number and Operations in Base Ten objectives, content curation

resources, and discussion posts. The unit project was entitled, “Let’s

Eat”. Students were to pretend that they just opened a fabulous, new

restaurant. Their job was to create and design a menu for a new restaurant.
 The menus must have at least 3 items underneath each of the following

categories: Appetizers Main Courses Desserts Beverages They needed to

include prices with decimals for each item on the menu.Then, students

needed to create least 8 word problems using the student-created menu.

Two word problems should be addition or subtraction. Two word

problems should be multiplication. Two word problems should be

division. Two word problems should be at least 2-step problems. Students

will ensure that all word problems are written in final draft form. Students

should also provided the answer key to each problem. Students were

graded on a rubric out of 12 possible points which is equivalent to 100%.

III. Student Data

Unit Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4

Discussion
s
Discussion 100 90 100 80
1:
EduBlogs 1
Discussion 100 80 90 90
2: EduBlog
2
Discussion 100 100 100 100
3: Twitter 1
Discussion 100 100 100 100
4: Twitter 2
Class 100 93 98 93
Average
Unit Project: Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4
Restaurant 100 94 100 88
Menu Project

Unit Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4

Assessments
Quiz 1: 100 100 80 100
Google Forms
Quiz 2: 100 90 100 80
GoConqr
Class Average 100 95 90 90
IV. Unit Assessment Analysis

A. Student 1 Analysis: Student 1 completed all four discussion posts. Student 1

received an average grade of a 100 because on all discussions she received full

credit being able to visually explain how she solved each problem step by step.

The average grade for her quizzes was a perfect 100. She performed

phenomenally on the Restaurant Menu Project receiving another perfect score of

100. Overall, Student 1 performed exceptionally well on the entire content

module.

B. Student 2 Analysis: Student 2 completed all four discussion posts and the

two quizzes. The average grade for her quizzes was a 95 because she answered

one of the GoConqr questions incorrectly. She received an average grade of a 93

on her discussion posts or exit tickets. On the second EduBlogs post she

answered the question, however, did not create a division with decimals problem

with remainder for her classmates to solve. So she did not receive full credit for

that post. Student 2 scored a 94 on the unit project. Based on the rubric, she did

not score the maximum number of points for her answer key. She had one error

in her answers. Overall, Student 2 performed well on the entire content module.

C. Student 3 Analysis: Student 3 also completed the entire module. Student 3

received an average grade of a 98 on his discussion posts. On the second

EduBlogs post he provided a division with decimals problem for his classmates

to solve, however, it didn’t have a remainder. He did not receive full credit for

that post. Quiz 1 he missed one of the five word problem scoring an 80. He

scored 100% on Quiz 2. This gave him an assessment average of 90. Student 3
 scored a perfect score of 100 on the Unit Project: Let’s Eat! Overall, Student 3

could have scored higher on Quiz 1, however, his lack of attention during certain

components caused him to score slightly lower than projected. The schoolwide

positive behavior incentive was to be held later that day, so possibly that caused

a slight glitch in the scores.

D. Student 4 Analysis: Student 4 completed both discussion posts and quizzes.

Student 4 received an average grade of 93 on unit discussions. The Edublogs

post scores of 80 and 90 caused a decrease in average. Student did not use the

prompt provided in the first discussion and didn’t provide a question for his

classmates to solve in discussion 2. His average grade on quizzes is a 90%. He

scored an 88 on his unit project. He lost a few points for grammatical errors and

one of his answers provided was incorrect. Overall, Student 4 performed well on

content module, however, there is room for growth through an intervention

lesson.

V. Field Notes

A. Student 1: Student 1 followed all directions during the entire module.

During the first couple of days of the module, I noticed she was sort of confused

and asked for assistance as to the flow of the module. This was her first time

going through a content module. Once I was able to review the expectations and

outline with her she performed very well.

B. Student 2: Student 2 was very intrigued by the module because it was first

time completing an online course or unit. Due to the fact that she was excited,
 she did spark up more conversation with the others than allowed and had to be

redirected. Once redirected a few times, student continued to perform well.

C. Student 3: As previously mentioned, on the day students were assessed the.

schoolwide PBIS celebration was to occur later in that afternoon. This caused a

slight distraction in Student 3’s performance on one of his quizzes.

D. Student 4: Student 4 was the most focused of all the students. However, I do

feel there is room for growth in his performance. I believe he will do great with

an intervention booster just to be sure he mastered the skill objectives.

VI. Peer Review Evaluation for Jana Jordan

Content Module Review for Jana Jordan

Peer Reviewer: Taitiana Pitkonen Review Date: 4/4/19
Unacceptable (1 Point) Acceptable (2 Points) Target (3 Points) Points
Content curation tool is 1. Content curation tool Must have all of these criteria: 3
Module linked to the online course is embedded (not linked)
1. Content curation is embedded (not Several sites that
4 OR in the online course linked) in the online course. align with
Curated ● Content curation tool AND 2. Content curation tool selected standards.
selected from the 2. Content curation tool from the article “17 of the Best
Resour
article “17 of the Best selected from the article Content Curation Tools” and
ces “17 of the Best Content 3. Used with links to a minimum
Content Curation
Tools” and used with Curation Tools” and of 8 unique web resources (do
links to a minimum of 4 used with links to a not select more than one from a
unique web resources. minimum of 6 unique single domain name.)
OR web resources 4. Resources match the
● Many duplicate web BUT Also… instructional objectives, are
sites included. OR ● One duplicate web high-quality and age
● Tool selected was not site included OR appropriate.
from the content Resources do not exactly 5. ALL links are active.
curation list. match the 6. Annotations are descriptive
instructional and qualitative.
● Resources do not
objectives OR 7. Annotations are age-
match the instructional
● Some resources are appropriate to guide learners to
objectives. OR
not age-appropriate use of the resources.
● Most resources are not
age-appropriate OR OR
● More than one link is ● One of the links is
not active. OR not active OR
 ● Annotations are ● Annotations are
missing/incomplete. complete but some
simply provide a
content summary.

Online Module does not 1.Online Module Must have all of these criteria: 3
Module
include any social media, contains at least two 1.Online Module contains 2 or I like the use of
OR different social media more different social media apps images on your
5
● Social media is not apps AND 2.All links to social media are twitter. I like how
Commu effectively integrated, 2. All links to social active and created for your you linked Khan
nication OR media are active and online module Academy videos
– Social ● Social media links are have been created for 3.Social media is effectively on your
Media not active, OR your online module AND integrated into the course discussion
and ● Course does not 3. Social media is content in a meaningful way questions on
contain sufficient integrated into the 5. Course contains multiple your blog. That
Discuss
discussions, OR course content in a discussions would be helpful
ions meaningful way AND 6. Clear match between the if students
● Discussions do not
4. Course contains at discussion question and the needed more
match course
least two discussions instructional objective support.
objectives
AND 7. Discussion focuses on higher
5. Discussions match level thinking
content AND 8. At least two discussions are
6. At least one posted using a social media
discussion post is format (ie. Facebook, Pinterest,
created using a social Twitter, etc).
media format.

1. Course rubric ● 1.Course Must have all of these criteria: 3

Modu does not contain rubrics contain ● 1.Course rubric I like how you
le 6 sufficient levels levels that are contains levels that are included videos
Asse OR well defined well defined and fit the for students.
ssme ● Course rubric does not AND learning target
nt –
contain criteria that ● 2.Course rubric ● 2. Course rubric
align with content OR contains at contains 3 or more
Rubri
● Quiz does not least two levels levels to distinguish
cs measure the stated of student between student
and objectives OR performance performance
Quizz ● Quiz contains AND ● 3. Rubric criteria
es grammatical and/or ● 3.Rubric directly align with the
spelling errors OR criterion align activity content it is
● Quiz is not created with overall intended to assess
using an online tool (ie. content AND ● 4. Quiz questions
Quizlet or Google ● 4.Quiz match instructional
Forms) questions objectives
match ● 5. All multiple choice
instructional questions have at least
objectives AND 3-4 response options;
● 5.Quizzes are No True/False
grammatically questions.
correct and do ● 6. Quizzes are
not contain any grammatically correct
misspellings and do not contain any
AND misspellings
6.Quiz is created using 7.Quizzes are created using an
an online tool such as online tool such as Quizlet or
Quizlet or Google Forms Google Forms
1.Online Module does not 1.Online Module utilizes Must have all of these criteria: 3
Mod
show evidence or has 3+ elements of Universal I like how you
ule 8 limited evidence of meeting Design for Learning 1. Online Module clearly included the
Dive the needs of diverse AND utilizes Universal Design for translate
rsity learners. Learning (6+ checkpoints) instructions on
and
Acc
essi
bility
 2. Online Module offers 2. Online Module utilizes your homepage.
some evidence of Differentiated Instruction as The visuals you
Differentiated Instruction evidenced by differentiated chose are very
AND assignments bright, colorful,
3. Online Module includes and high res.
3. Online Module shows specific accessibility and/or
evidence of some assistive technology
accessibility resources.
adaptations. AND 4. Multiple (4+) assistive
technology resources are
4. Links to (2+) assistive linked to.
technology resources
provided
Content and 1. Much of the 1. Most of the Must have all of these criteria: 3
Organization instructional content I instructional content Your website
needed to complete I needed to 1. All of the instructional was very easy to
the content module complete the content I needed to navigate, had
was missing. OR content module was complete the content student friendly
2. I couldn’t access the present. AND module was present. language, and
site on the first try. OR 2. I could access the 2. I could access the site and easy to follow
3. I had to request site on the first try. I all embedded content and along with.
access on 3 or more had to request links on the first try. Everything
embedded content access on no more 3. It was easy to work through worked as it
and/or links. OR than 2 embedded the course. I knew what to should.
4. Navigating through the content and/or links. do next.
course was confusing AND 4. There is no extraneous or
OR it was hard to find 3. It was easy for work placeholder content on the
things OR there is a lot through the course site
of extraneous content most of the time. 5. The site is well designed
on the site. OR AND and visually appealing. All
5. The text on the site is 4. There is some text is legible.
hard to read. OR extraneous content 6. There were no grammatical,
6. There are multiple on the site, but it punctuation or spelling
grammatical, wasn’t distracting or errors.
punctuation or spelling confusing. AND
errors. 5. The site is well
designed and
visually appealing.
All text is legible.
AND
6. There are one or
two grammatical,
punctuation or
spelling errors.
Total Score 15
Peer Reviewer Comments:
Comments are provided in the appropriate categories. However, overall the site is wonderful and very pleasing to the
eye as well as easy to navigate. Great work!
VII. Additional Data

A. There was no additional data collected in the completion of this content module.

VIII. Peer Review Evaluation for Cody Ryal

Content Module Review for Cody Ryal

Peer Reviewer: Jana Jordan Review Date: 4/6/19
Unacceptable (1 Point) Acceptable (2 Target (3 Points) Points
Points)
Content curation tool is 1. Content curation Must have all of these criteria: 2
Module linked to the online tool is embedded 1. Content curation is embedded (not You linked a total of
4 course OR (not linked) in the linked) in the online course. 8 great resources to
Curated ● Content curation online course AND 2. Content curation tool assist your learners
tool selected from 2. Content curation selected from the article “17 of with rounding two
Resour
the article “17 of tool selected from the Best Content Curation and three digit
ces the article “17 of the Tools” and numbers to the
the Best Content
Curation Tools” and Best Content 3. Used with links to a nearest ten.
used with links to a Curation Tools” and minimum of 8 unique web However, they were
minimum of 4 used with links to a resources (do not select more all pinned to your
unique web minimum of 6 than one from a single domain Pintrest board, so
resources. OR unique web name.) most of the activities
● Many duplicate resources 4. Resources match the were not web
web sites included. BUT Also… instructional objectives, are resources. You
OR ● One duplicate high-quality and age actually had to
● Tool selected was website appropriate. create the games
not from the included OR 5. ALL links are active. versus completing
content curation Resources do not 6. Annotations are descriptive via the web.
list. exactly match and qualitative.
● Resources do not the instructional 7. Annotations are age-
objectives OR appropriate to guide learners
match the
● Some to use of the resources.
instructional
objectives. OR resources are
● Most resources are not age-
not age-appropriate appropriate OR
OR ● One of the links
● More than one link is not active OR
is not active. OR ● Annotations are
● Annotations are complete but
missing/incomplete. some simply
provide a
content
summary.

Online Module does not 1.Online Module Must have all of these criteria: 3
Module
include any social contains at least two 1.Online Module contains 2 or I like the use of
media, OR different social more different social media Twitter and Glogster
5
● Social media is not media apps AND apps for your discussions.
Commu effectively 2. All links to social 2.All links to social media are Both sites were
nication integrated, OR media are active active and created for your accessible for me to
– Social ● Social media links and have been online module use. All discussion
Media are not active, OR created for your 3.Social media is effectively questions match the
and online module AND integrated into the course learning objective.
Discuss
ions
 ● Course does not 3. Social media is content in a meaningful way
contain sufficient integrated into the 5. Course contains multiple
discussions, OR course content in a discussions
● Discussions do not meaningful way 6. Clear match between the
match course AND discussion question and the
objectives 4. Course contains instructional objective
at least two 7. Discussion focuses on
discussions AND higher level thinking
5. Discussions 8. At least two discussions are
match content AND posted using a social media
6. At least one format (ie. Facebook,
discussion post is Pinterest, Twitter, etc).
created using a
social media format.

1. Course rubric ● 1.Course 3

Modu does not rubrics You embedded two
le 6 contain contain great sites for
Asse sufficient levels levels that learners to use to
OR are well complete your
ssme
● Course rubric does defined Must have all of these criteria: assessment.I have
nt – ● 1.Course rubric used both and my
not contain criteria AND
Rubri ● 2.Course contains levels that students love them.
that align with
cs content OR rubric are well defined and However, the
and ● Quiz does not contains at fit the learning target ClassMarker site
Quizz measure the stated least two ● 2. Course rubric was unaccessible
objectives OR levels of contains 3 or more with an error notice,
es
student levels to distinguish “This account is
● Quiz contains
performanc between student presently out of
grammatical and/or
e AND performance credits so tests
spelling errors OR
● 3.Rubric ● 3. Rubric criteria cannot be taken.”
● Quiz is not created
using an online tool criterion directly align with the
(ie. Quizlet or align with activity content it is
Google Forms) overall intended to assess
content ● 4. Quiz questions
AND match instructional
● 4.Quiz objectives
questions ● 5. All multiple choice
match questions have at
instructiona least 3-4 response
l objectives options; No
AND True/False questions.
● 5.Quizzes ● 6. Quizzes are
are grammatically correct
grammatic and do not contain
ally correct any misspellings
and do not 7.Quizzes are created using
contain any an online tool such as Quizlet
misspelling or Google Forms
s AND
6.Quiz is created
using an online tool
such as Quizlet or
Google Forms
1.Online Module does 1.Online Module Must have all of these criteria: 3
Mod
not show evidence or utilizes 3+ elements You provided links
ule 8 has limited evidence of of Universal Design 1. Online Module clearly and descriptions to 3
Dive meeting the needs of for Learning AND utilizes Universal Design Assistive
rsity diverse learners. for Learning (6+ Technology
and 2. Online Module checkpoints) resources.
Acc offers some 2. Online Module utilizes
essi
bility
 evidence of Differentiated Instruction
Differentiated as evidenced by
Instruction AND differentiated
assignments
3. Online Module 3. Online Module includes
shows evidence of specific accessibility
some accessibility and/or assistive
adaptations. AND technology resources.
4. Multiple (4+) assistive
4. Links to (2+) assistive technology resources are
technology linked to.
resources provided
Content 1. Much of the 1. Most of the Must have all of these criteria: 2
and instructional instructional Although, I was able
Organizati content I needed to content I 1. All of the instructional to see each different
on complete the needed to content I needed to component of your
content module complete the complete the content content module, i do
was missing. OR content module module was present. feel there could have
2. I couldn’t access was present. 2. I could access the site been a little more
the site on the first AND and all embedded content organization. I liked
try. OR 2. I could access and links on the first try. how the Content
3. I had to request the site on the 3. It was easy to work Curation had its own
access on 3 or first try. I had to through the course. I separate link.All
more embedded request access knew what to do next. other content was
content and/or on no more 4. There is no extraneous or added to that same
links. OR than 2 placeholder content on page versus having
4. Navigating through embedded the site a clear, defined.
the course was content and/or 5. The site is well designed separate
confusing OR it links. AND and visually appealing. All Discussions,
was hard to find 3. It was easy for text is legible. Quizzes, and Project
things OR there is work through 6. There were no Rubric page.
a lot of extraneous the course most grammatical, punctuation
content on the site. of the time. or spelling errors.
OR AND
5. The text on the site 4. There is some
is hard to read. OR extraneous
6. There are multiple content on the
grammatical, site, but it
punctuation or wasn’t
spelling errors. distracting or
confusing. AND
5. The site is well
designed and
visually
appealing. All
text is legible.
AND
6. There are one
or two
grammatical,
punctuation or
spelling errors.
Total Score 13
Peer Reviewer Comments:
Comments are provided in the appropriate categories. Overall, the site is great! There are a few things I may
would “tweak.” But, I do feel students will come to this module and learn. Good job!