Dracula
Dracula
be/q9D74m628gQ
A. Please watch the video once without activating closed captions and
answer as many of the following questions.
6. WHAT SKILL DOES DRACULA HAVE IN THE TURKISH, BBC, LANGELLA AND
COPPOLA VERSIONS?
11. WHAT REPELLENT APPEARS IN THE BBC 1977, NOSFERATU REMAKE AND
COPPOLA VERSIONS AND NOT IN THE OTHERS? COMMUNION WAFER/HOST
13. WHAT WAS THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURE OF THE BOOK THAT ONLY ONE
FILM ADAPTATION KEPT?
19. WHAT VARIATIONS ARE THERE FOR THE CARFAX ABBEY TRANSACTION?
20. WHAT TWO DRACULA QUOTES COVER THE WOLVES HOWLING AT NIGHT?
22. WHAT DOES DRACULA GIVE THESE VAMPIRE WOMEN AS FOOD IN THREE
FILMS?
26. WHAT VARIATIONS ARE THERE WHEN MINA WAITS FOR HER HUSBAND?
34. WHAT IS VAMPIRE LUCY'S VICTIM OF CHOICE ACROSS THE FILMS AND
WHICH FILM CROSSES A LINE?
35. HOW DOES VAN HELSING CONFRONTS LUCY THE VAMPIRE IN THE FILMS?
42. WHAT VARIATIONS ARE THERE FOR MINA DRINKING DRACULA'S BLOOD?
46. WHO DO VAN HELSING AND MINA MEET NEAR DRACULA'S CASTLE?
51. WHICH FILMS SHOW QUINCEY'S DEATH AND TRANSYLVANIA YEARS AFTER
HIS DEATH?
53. WHAT ARE THE MAIN DIGRESSIONS FROM THE BOOK THAT THE
COPPOLA'S VERSION TAKE?
Introduction:
presents the subject that is to be compared or contrasted ends with a
thesis statement that focuses the comparison or contrast
Body Paragraph 1:
includes a clear topic sentence about similarities supporting details
(give details to develop and support the main idea of the paragraph)
Body Paragraph 2:
includes a clear topic sentence about differences supporting details
(give details to develop and support the main idea of the paragraph)
Conclusion:
summarizes the differences and similarities and allows writers to state
their feeling about the topic.
1. Look at the outline for the essay ' My two homes' and reorganise
the essay content (A-O) based on the outline
2. Read your final version of the essay carefully and correct any
errors
3. IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING THAT LOOKING AT ANY KEYS/ANSWERS THAT YOU
MIGHT FIND ONLINE WOULD COMPLETELY DEFEAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK!
OUTLINE:
Introduction:
In essay, New York City and Quetzaltenango, Guatemala are compared and
contrasted. Thesis statement: When you compare them, they seem like
dramatically different places, but they have some things in common, and I
love them both.
Body Paragraph 1:
Topic sentence which focuses on similarities: There are many reasons why
New York seems like my home away from home. similarities between two
cities: Both cities are
- striking and distinctive
- have a nickname and central park
Body Paragraph 2:
Topic sentence which focuses on differences: Despite their similarities,
these cities are different.differences between two cities:
- color
- pace of life
Conclusion:
summary of the similarities and differences
My Two Homes
C. There are two places that have had profound impact in my life. One
of them is New York City, and the other is Quetzaltenango,
Guatemala.
D. For example, each has its own nickname. everyone knows New York is
"the Big Apple." Quetzaltenango is known as "Xela" (pronounced
shey-la), which is a lot easier to say!
F. There are many reasons why New York seems like my home away from
home. Both cities are striking and distinctive.
G. At lunch they order food from work and eat their desks. In Xela
people eat their breakfast at home and most come home from work a
much more relaxed and longer lunch.
H. At lunch they order food from work and eat their desks. In Xela
people eat their breakfast at home and most come home from work a
much more relaxed and longer lunch.
K. On the other hand, New Yorkers are often in such a hurry, they don`
even stop to eat. For breakfast they buy food on the street, and
eat it while they are walking or on the subway.
L. These places represent the best of both worlds. New York is more
hurried and rushed when I need energy, and Xela gives me a shower
pace when I need to relax. Together they keep me balanced.
M. The second thing I notice is the pace of life. They say New York
never sleeps, and it must be true, because I always see people
walking and cars on the streets, even late at night.
N. In conclusion, these are the two cities I love. For me, both are
home, are unique, and are filled with interesting people.
<iframe
src="https://wheeldecide.com/e.php?c1=1&c2=2&c3=3&c4=4&c5=5&c6=6&c7=7&c8=
8&c9=9&c10=10&c11=11&c12=12&c13=13&c14=14&c15=15&c16=16&c17=17&c18=18&c19
=19&c20=20&c21=21&c22=22&c23=23&c24=24&c25=25&c26=26&c27=27&c28=28&c29=29
&c30=30&c31=31&c32=32&c33=33&c34=34&c35=35&c36=36&c37=37&c38=38&c39=39&c4
0=40&c41=41&c42=42&c43=43&c44=44&c45=45&c46=46&c47=47&c48=48&c49=49&c50=5
0&c51=51&c52=52&c53=53&cols=A10E33,ffffff,C47CB7,ffffff,FFC4C4,ffffff&t=W
hat+to+Do+on+a+Date%3F&time=5&tcol=ffffff,A10E33,ffffff,A10E33,A10E33,A10
E33&remove=1" width="500" height="500" scrolling="no"
frameborder="0"></iframe>
KEY
CHARACTERS
Renfield is usually included he's only missing from the Turkish hammer
Palance and BBC oh six version the Turkish version has a hunchback
servant with a very phony mustache he's never in an asylum or fits the
character in Nosferatu he was originally named NOK in the - classic
Universal versions Renfield does over time taking over the role of
Jonathan only for the Transylvania scenes
Mina is in all them in Nosferatu she's called Ellen but in the English
translation she's Nina in the Spanish version she's Eva in the Turkish
version she's Guzan in the Langella version an Oscar Otto remakes she's
named Lucy even though the role is clearly Mina in the nos Farhat to
remake there's a separate character named Mina who is extremely minor
appearing in one brief talking scene and later as a dead body Lucy
appears in all of them except for both nos ratu's the original Nosferatu
has a character named Ruth who was switched to Lucy for the English
version but she's too minor and not connected to the character in the
Turkish version she's named Sudan and the Langella version has already
stated she switched to Mina
Arthur Holmwood first appeared in the Turkish version named Tehran after
that he was pretty regular appearing in Hammer Franco Palin's Coppola BBC
oh six in the Franko version they call him Quincy even though he's
engaged to Lucy and seems to mostly fit the Arthur role also the original
BBC version as already mentioned combines him with Quincey Morris even
merging their names Quincey Homewood is he more Quincey or more Arthur
it's pretty equal and I can't give two points for one hybrid character so
half a point Quincey Morris the least favorite character apparently BBC
gets the other half point here but Coppola is the only version to have
the real character way to go Coppola
dr. Seward is in most of them he's missing from Palance and Nosferatu
remake and in Hammer he's way too minor it's just a quick walk-on role
and with no Renfield for him to interact with you'd never know it's him
except for the name in Nosferatu he's professor severs in Turkish he's
dr. a thief and in BBC oh six they just call him by his first name John
but you also have Jonathan Harker so why on earth would you call him John
dr. van Helsing is in all of them except the original Nosferatu there's a
minor character named professor Buller for the English version they
changed him to Van Helsing but he does absolutely nothing important
CASTLE
Now let's get into the other elements from the book first the castle is
depicted in every film so that's a wash I guess some of them use actual
locations which makes me beg the question why not a single one of them
not even for a quick exterior shot used a famous romanian location like
ponary or bran castle
DE-AGING DRACULA
in the book dracula d ages as he obtains fresh blood he gets younger a
simple make-up effect and nobody wanted to do it except for Franco
Coppola and BBC oh six
DRACULA/BAT
Dracula turns into a bat this happens in all except Nosferatu hammer and
Palance hammer even says explicitly that Dracula changing into a bat is a
common fantasy but everything else that happens is perfectly believable
the Turkish version has the most hilarious bat and Coppola has the most
exaggerated
DRACULA/DOG/WOLF
turns into a wolf or a large dog this happens in Lugosi though it's off
screen with Franco I'm not sure if the dog in the picture is Dracula it's
a random shot that comes out of nowhere and the dog has a collar but they
mentioned Dracula can change into a wolf so it counts in Palance a dog
gets shot down and dies so it can't be Dracula BBC Langella and Coppola
all get a point however Coppola is again is pretty far out there Dracula
can turn into mist Spanish BBC Langella Coppola all get a point simple
DRACULA/WALL CLIMBING
Dracula can climb walls like a lizard first happens in Turkish then BBC
Langella and Coppola done
DRACULA/SOIL
every film explains that Dracula can only sleep in his native soil which
I've always wondered wouldn't he be all dirty
CRUCIFIX
Dracula's repelled by a cross or crucifix pretty classic it's in all of
them except Nosferatu and Turkish
GARLIC
Garlic another classic repellent it's used in Turkish hammer pounds BBC
Langella and Coppola Lugosi switches it for Wolfsbane and Spanish has an
unspecified wreath of flowers the word garlic not being used
COMMUNION WAFER/HOST
The sacred wafer used many times in the book but only shows up in three
of the films BBC 77, Nosferatu remake and Coppola
SUNLIGHT
Here's a shocker in the book Dracula's cited outside in the daytime
that's right sunlight does not kill him it only weakens his powers and
Nosferatu there is a shot where he's out in the day which you may think
is a flub or a contradiction to the film's ending where he's killed by
sunlight but it was actually a day for night shot filmed that day but
takes place at night it's not obvious unless you see it with the original
blue color tinting the only films were Dracula is really on the de are
both BBC versions and Coppola in the first BBC Dracula's the coachman but
you don't see him until the end of the scene which ends at night so
assuming he was driving the horses the whole time that would have meant
he was out in the day it's tricky but I think it counts in Langella
Dracula says he can move about in the day but that's only if he stays in
a dark spot the sunlight still kills him
DIFFERENT NARRATORS
a big thing about the book was that it was written with multiple
narrators through journal entries it's kind of like the equivalent of a
modern-day found-footage horror film it gave it a realistic vibe in the
movies it will be simple to have voiceovers with all the characters
hammer begins with Jonathan Harker narrating but he's the only one later
van Helsing is seen speaking into a phonograph but it's not voiceover
even in the BBC O six version Jonathan is the only one who ever narrates
so a big award goes to Coppola for being the only film to honor this very
distinguishable trait of the book
CHRONOLOGY/TIMELINE/TRANSYLVANIA
now let's get into the main plot in rough chronological order first I
have to say it's hard to establish a consistent criteria I'll have to
make a judgment call on a case-by-case basis I say characters and
locations can be changed as long as the event is the same it can also
happen off screen as long as it's explained so first we have Jonathan
Harker travelling the Transylvania each movie acknowledges it in some way
with some liberties the universal versions have Renfield instead the
hammer' version has Harker arriving to destroy Dracula but the one that I
think crosses the line is the Langella version because none of the
traveling takes place Harker never goes to Transylvania he only meets
Dracula at Carfax Abbey after he's already sold it to him so that first
act never happens
COACHMAN/DRACULA
the coachman who brings Jonathan to the castle is Dracula happens in
Nosferatu the universals Turkish Franco BBC and Coppola with palin's it's
hard to tell but I doubt that's Jack Palance as knows
CARFAX TRANSACTION
Joplin sells him the property in England it happens in every version
except hammer in most cases the property is Carfax Abbey like in the book
but in the Turkish version Jonathan is a lawyer selling him kiosks in
Istanbul property nevertheless
DEMETER SHIP
Dracula travels to England aboard a ship called the Demeter and kills
everybody on board most films depict the captain tied to the wheel but
the only ones that ignore the event altogether are Turkish hammer and
Franco
BLOOD TRANSFUSION
Lucy's condition is examined and she's given a blood transfusion
Nosferatu ignores it in the universals she's already dead the rest all
have it but a few minor things to note in Franco its dr. Seward who takes
charge when in the book it's van Helsing Langella I had the debate
because of the name switch and the event happens in a different time in
the story but still I think it counts in BBC oh six it's Seward who does
the transfusion because as I already said Arthur points a gun to him dr.
RENFIELD’S DEATH
Dracula kills Renfield pretty simple five of them have it in the two
universals he strangles them and throws him down a staircase in Beebe see
it happens off screen in Langella he twists his head around and in
Coppola he turns to green mist and slams Renfield repeatedly into the
prison bars
RETURNING TO TRANSYLVANIA
They all follow Dracula to Transylvania half of the films preserve this
final act even though it differs some you'll see it in all the colour
films except Langella Nosferatu remake and BBC oh six
DRACULA'S DEATH
now the big one Dracula's death the heroes kill him in every film but are
any of them close enough to the book in the book he's killed by ordinary
knives Jonathan slashes his throat while Quincey stabs his heart well in
nos rot - its sunlight nope in the universals van Helsing drives a wooden
stake through his heart nope and Turkish it's a stake and decapitation
not quite in hammer its sunlight nope in Franco it's fire nope in Palance
van Helsing impales him with a spear with some sunlight for good measure
nope in BBC it's van Helsing with the steak again nope in Langella he's
hung on a ship hook and struck by sunlight nope in the NOS fought to
remake its sunlight again Plus van Helsing stakes an off-screen nope in
Coppola it's knives Jonathan goes for his throat Quincey goes for the
heart Wow somebody finally got it right in BBC oh six it's a stake
through the back nope and in the final shot he's alive again well that
one's sure off the mark with Coppola there are differences in the book
Dracula never gets out of the coffin but in the movie he gets up and
tries to fight back in the book right after the knives he crumbles to
dust immediately but in the movie he and Mina go into the castle to have
one last melodramatic dying scene with all that aside Dracula is killed
by the correct characters with the correct weapons targeting the correct
places on the body it's the only film that comes close enough
QUINCEY'S DEATH
next quincy dies from wounds inflicted from the battle with the gypsies
only in BBC and coppola end at last in the final chapter the rest of the
characters returned to Transylvania years later to pay their respects to
quincy only the BBC version includes this final scene and here's the
final score as you can see the 1977 BBC version comes out on top but the
Coppola version trails very close behind one could argue that there are
other plot points to consider so there is
My Two Homes
There are two places that have had profound impact in my life. One of
them is New York City, and the other is Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. When
you compare them, they seem like dramatically different places, but they
have some things in common, and I love them both.
There are many reasons why New York seems like my home away from home.
Both cities are striking and distinctive. For example, each has its own
nickname. everyone knows New York is "the Big Apple." Quetzaltenango is
known as "Xela" (pronounced shey-la), which is a lot easier to say!
Second, both cities have a "Central Park" where people like to go and
walk. Although Central Park in Xela is smaller, its tropical flowers and
colonial architecture mean it is just as beautiful as New York`s.
Furthermore, when you walk around Xela, you find many tourists and people
from other countries, just like in New York. For me, this means
conversations in Xela are just as interesting as conversations in New
York.
In conclusion, these are the two cities I love. For me, both are home,
are unique, and are filled with interesting people. These places
represent the best of both worlds. New York is more hurried and rushed
when I need energy, and Xela gives me a shower pace when I need to relax.
Together they keep me balanced.
http://sana.aalto.fi/awe/cohesion/signposts/contrast/index.html