0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views

Hypothesis Test: Independent Groups (T-Test, Pooled Variance)

The document describes the results of a regression analysis examining the relationship between nitrogen levels in soil (en suelo) and nitrogen levels in plants (N en planta). The regression analysis found a strong positive correlation (r=0.975) between the two variables. Based on the regression equation, the model predicts that nitrogen levels in plants would be 0.13111 ppm when soil nitrogen is 0.35 ppm, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.1133 to 0.1489 ppm.

Uploaded by

Jaque Pecua
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views

Hypothesis Test: Independent Groups (T-Test, Pooled Variance)

The document describes the results of a regression analysis examining the relationship between nitrogen levels in soil (en suelo) and nitrogen levels in plants (N en planta). The regression analysis found a strong positive correlation (r=0.975) between the two variables. Based on the regression equation, the model predicts that nitrogen levels in plants would be 0.13111 ppm when soil nitrogen is 0.35 ppm, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.1133 to 0.1489 ppm.

Uploaded by

Jaque Pecua
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Hypothesis Test: Independent Groups (t-test, pooled variance)

Regression Analysis

r² 0.951 n 12
r 0.975 k 1
Std. Error 0.007 Dep. Var. N en planta (ppm)

ANOVA table
Source SS df MS F p-value
Regression 0.0090 1 0.0090 194.32 7.06E-08
Residual 0.0005 10 0.00005
Total 0.0095 11

Regression output confidence interval


variables coefficients std. error t (df=10) p-value 95% lower 95% upper
Intercept 0.0756 0.0081 9.349 2.93E-06 0.0576 0.0937
en suelo (ppm) 0.1585 0.0114 13.940 7.06E-08 0.1332 0.1838

Predicted values for: N en planta (ppm)


95% Confidence Interval 95% Prediction Interval
en suelo (ppm) Predicted lower upper lower upper Leverage
0.35 0.13111 0.12144 0.14077 0.11310 0.14911 0.405
Regression Analysis

r² 0.951 n 12
r 0.975 k 1
Std. Error 0.007 Dep. Var. N en planta (ppm)

ANOVA table
Source SS df MS F p-value
Regression 0.0090 1 0.0090 194.32 7.06E-08
Residual 0.0005 10 0.000046
Total 0.0095 11

Regression output confidence interval


variables coefficients std. error t (df=10) p-value 95% lower 95% upper
Intercept 0.0756 0.0081 9.349 2.93E-06 0.0576 0.0937
en suelo (ppm) 0.1585 0.0114 13.940 7.06E-08 0.1332 0.1838

Predicted values for: N en planta (ppm)


95% Confidence Interval 95% Prediction Interval
en suelo (ppm) Predicted lower upper lower upper Leverage
0.35 0.13111 0.12144 0.14077 0.11310 0.14911 0.405

Regression Analysis

r² 0.951 n 12
r 0.975 k 1
Std. Error 0.007 Dep. Var. N en planta (ppm)

ANOVA table
Source SS df MS F p-value
Regression 0.0090 1 0.0090 194.32 7.06E-08
Residual 0.0005 10 0.0000
Total 0.0095 11

Regression output confidence interval


variables coefficients std. error t (df=10) p-value 95% lower 95% upper
Intercept 0.0756 0.0081 9.349 2.93E-06 0.0576 0.0937
en suelo (ppm) 0.1585 0.0114 13.940 7.06E-08 0.1332 0.1838

Predicted values for: N en planta (ppm)


95% Confidence Interval 95% Prediction Interval
en suelo (ppm) Predicted lower upper lower upper Leverage
0.35 0.13111 0.12144 0.14077 0.11310 0.14911 0.405
N en N en

yˆ p  ( t / 2 , n  2 ) s
suelo planta
(ppm) (ppm)
0.42 0.13
1 0.0546

0.45 0.15
2 0.0675

0.5 0.16
3 0.08

2 1
0.55 0.17
4 0.0935

0.68 0.18
5 0.1224

s ind  s 1 
0.69 0.18
6 0.1242

0.7 0.19

n
7 0.133


0.73 0.2
8 0.146

0.8 0.2
9 0.16

0.9 0.21
10 0.189

0.92 0.22

2
s  CME
11 0.2024

0.94 0.23
12 0.2162

sumas 8.28 2.22 10.5

sc 6.0728 0.4202

suma xy 0.0546

media 0.69 0.185

scxx 0.3596

CME 4.6E-05

variables coefficients

Intercept 0.0756

suelo (ppm) 0.1585

r² 0.951 n 12

r 0.975 k 1
Std. Error 0.007 Dep. Var. N en planta (ppm)

ANOVA table

Source SS df MS F

Regression 0.0090 1 0.009035 194.32

Residual 0.0005 10 0.000046

Total 0.0095 11

95% Prediction Interval

suelo (ppm) Predicted lower upper

0.35 0.13111 0.11310 0.14911


 / 2 , n  2 ) s ind
f) ¿qué contenido de nitrógeno esperarías en la planta d

PIMERO ESTIMA Y A PARTIR DE 0.35 PPM, SUSTITUYE EN

2 1 ( x p  x ) 2 Y= 0.0756+0.1585x
Y= 0.0756+0.15858(0

s 1    0.13111

 n SC ( X )  0 .13111  ( 2 .228 ) S

ME sind  0 .000046 

2
s  CME
sind  Error estand
E  error de estim
Error están
E=

limite inferiro 0.1311


limite superior 0.1311

Se espera un contido
rógeno esperarías en la planta de trigo cuando en el suelo se tienen 0.35 y 0.85 ppm de N? Utiliza una confianza de 95%.

RTIR DE 0.35 PPM, SUSTITUYE EN LA ECUACCIÓN DE REGRESIÓN

0756+0.1585x
0756+0.15858(0.35)
ESTE VALOR ES Y GORRITO P

11  ( 2 .228 ) S ind
 1 ( 0 .35  0 .69 ) 2 
 0 .000046 1   
 12 0 . 3596 
CME
 Error estandar
error de estimación  ( valor crítico ) S ind
0.008
0.018

e inferiro 0.1311- 0.10178 0.1133


e superior 0.1311+0.10178 0.1489

pera un contido entre 0.1133 y 0.1489 ppm en la planta de trigo cua


onfianza de 95%.
anta de trigo cuando en el suelo se tienen 0.35 con una confianza de
confianza de 95%.

You might also like